Frank O'Donnell on Fox News' political agenda

[Sonofmanbearpig1]

This asshole is a faggot.

Obviously they fired him .

FOX RULES! Noone even bothers watching maddow, olberfool or ed schlitz.

[AlbertEinsteinsGhost]

all news station are a joke, but fox is just the funniest joke of them all

[mattjnor98]

Unfair and Biased.

Faux Noise: They Distort, We Reply.

[1gainsayer]

How can Fox News even call themselves "news"?  They're just campy entertainment IMO.

[82Pumpkinfarms]

"Zero news value" is just one of the many negative ways Faux News operates.

[BEEFisRaw]

tHIS GUYS A DICK MOOB.

[cantgt1]

Thanks Fox News for exposing the racist, socialist, terrorist, anti-american, and elitist Obama. If Fox lies, just have all the socialist media, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, NYT, etc. prove them wrong.

[adam211269]

Naw, you'll never change my mind on that, but thanks, Bill O was and will always be a moron, point of facts, he never debates the issue, as in the Rosie O Case when Bill O, was trying to debunk her statments made on the Show called "The View" all he could say was she is fat, and ungly and stupid, but never once did he ever saying anything in regaurds to her actual statments, his statments talk nothing of the real issues, he he could actually debate it without his name calling

[neokevin3]

CNN News stacks the deck against Republicans

CNN employs 85% democrats to do their reporting. Hmmm, fair and balanced?

[BB8house]

sorry neokevin3, but that's not true, most of the commentators on CNN are republican, get a clue, stop buying into the propaganda sold to the sheep on the faux snooze channel.

[archibot]

Here's some proof:

Search for this vid: "Olbermann on Faux News Memos"

[benfriendly]

At least you don't deny FOX is for liars and their lovers....even if the rest of your spew is pure drivel.

[adam211269]

Fox News, Simply put sucks as news, it's nothing more than Jerry Springer on a Meth rush... Propaganda at its finest as one person said, it's bought and paid for. all main stream media has the same but varying degrees of political agenda but none as much as FOX, Bill O,Boy is a moron who should be held in contempt for government cover-ups and should go down with the Bush Administration for treason of the worst kind.

[ginerlynn]

"Fair and balanced"? U have got to be kidding. Fox is so bought and paid for that no one with an iq in 3 digits,regardless of their left or right leanings,could ever think of Fox as either one.If you like you so-called "news" spun daily by the likes O'Reilly,great,watch it,but for the love of God,don't claim they are remotely fair or credible.

[NoGuff]

I completely agree. Their attitude is best expressed by mags like "New Yorker" where these few elitist people, who've never done a hard days work, or served in the military, sit in their fancy NYC office and tell us what we should think and do, as if someone appointed them to the post. Its disgusting.

[shreddog2049]

A bunch of talk but no facts. And with ALL the talk of Fox being more conservative, does it ever cross your mind that all the other networks are very pro democratic? Why are you sooo scared on ONE channel having a different view than all the others?

[NoGuff]

I agree. Where are the facts? Its just a bunch of opinions in the form of pseudo facts. None of them can answer the question why, when all the other news outlets are biased Left, is FNC seen as "wrong" or "evil" if its biased Right? No answers ever!

[adam211269]

News in any source should be based on facts not personal agendas left wing right wing, every news media has the same ability to tell the truth but they refuse not to.

[kbandomer]

Fox News should not be allowed to call themselves a news channel. So many examples of adulterated facts to complete a right wing bias. It sickens me.

[NoGuff]

I've examined all the major news outlets, and all of them have a political agenda and bend the news to fit that agenda. The only thing that makes FNC different is that it isn't Left Wing. Why then are all the Left Wing biased news outlets ok and FNC somehow wrong and sickening? It doesn't make sense, unless you're a Left Winger yourself.

[kbandomer]

It's just that Fox portrays itself to be the only "Fair and Balanced" news outlet when in fact independent analysts who investigate these things say that the Fox guest list is something like 70-80 percent conservative, the think tanks they refer in reporting are over 90 percent conservative while most other outlets (ABC NBC CBS CNN NPR)fall around 50-50 in both counts. It's ok to have a bias but not when you claim to be fair and balanced.

[NoGuff]

Sorry, but I question your "ind. analysts." I watch all the news outlets and their guest lists are just the opposite, like 90% Liberal. I've never seen a 50-50 split on those channels. I'd love to see the documentation on this.

[kbandomer]

News 90 percent liberal? , 99 percent from It5lee? Check Survey from "Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting July/August 04, Google "Still Failing the Fair and Balanced Test, or Thursday March 30th "Unfair and imbalanced from Media Matters, or look up Cybercollege Internet Campus "Does TV have a Liberal Bias or look up The O'Reilly Factor on Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia. Now show me documentation for 90% liberal with scientific methodology.

[NoGuff]

Holy crap! Did you read the recent or archive section of the FAIR website? "Editing Chavez to Manufacture a Slur," and another singling out Glenn Beck of CNN-HN as a Fascist, and on US elections "Noam Chomsky on 'Failed States'." First, Chomsky is a well-known Communist. Second, these headlines speak volums about the BIAS of this website. Sorry!

[kbandomer]

Question methodology of a survey, not that other headlines from the publishing source are different than yours. We all have preferences, thats what makes USA great. But a study is either scientifically valid or not. Data from a broad spectrum of sources indicates that Fox is biased toward the right while they claim to be fair and balanced. There are many other studies all sharing this same conclusion. If scholarly evidence exists supporting Fox's neutrality, post it so everyone can see.

[NoGuff]

kbandomer, so you're saying don't judge where the study comes from, judge only the study on its scientific method? Sorry, that doesn't even work in a court of law. If NAMBLA's website had the results of a scientifically conducted study that concluded young boys should have sex with men because it's healthy for them, would you accept it based on their study methods?

[kbandomer]

A study can only be valid if its methodology stands up to the requirements of scientific method. The scientific community would refute your MANBLA study just as it does those scientisits hired by the oil companies to deny global warming. The studies I mentined put their methodology out there for all to review because it holds up to the requirements of s. method. If it didn't Fox would sure file for D of character charges for calling them liars.

[NoGuff]

Now you're agreeing with me, that the messenger is just as important as the message. And as far as "fair and balanced" goes, isn't that subjective? I consider them fair and balanced, but not everyone will. Does that make it a crime? Plus, how many products listed as "new and improved" are really improved enough to warrant that label? Will you make a federal case out of those as well?

[Duckenheimer]

The other major news outlets don't even compare in terms of corruption.

[benfriendly]

To call FOX news a "news source" is a stretch. It is mindless drivel, brainwashing, propaganda....not news. It represents the darkest side of America most characteristic in the republican party and the lowest common denominator of the population.

[Duckenheimer]

Most conservatives would agree.

People who justify Fox News are being blind.