Very nice work. I loved watching this, and obviously both actresses spent a lot of time dedicated to this, and it shows. Lovely job. I'm directing this play at my school, so know some of the challenges of the roles.
Question. Did you guys change the script to different wording, or did it come like this? I loved the pacing of this.
Do anyone understand this at all because I sure don't. my teacher have us reading and researching this play and I truly do not understand it. Is this about two friends that were close at one point and the silent one is still missing with the husband behind closed doors and the one that keep running her mouth is knowing that he really is inlove with her and feels real stupid? I do not get it at all
the woman Mrs. X is just now realizing or actually truly beginning to feel the real relationship between Mrs. Y and her husband (which is an affair). She tries to be the bigger person....in stating the truth....but in reality its ironic because she is going back to her husband whom cheated on her in the first place. Mrs. X's husband morphed Mrs. X into Mrs. Y without Mrs. X not realizing it until now...it is confusing.
My name is Christina Dow and I play the silent part in this video. I agree, it's open to interpretation as to who is "The Stronger." With this play, August Strindberg captures wonderfully the duality of the role women play in society. In Mrs. X (Bret Crain, speaking role) we have the woman as caring mother and devoted wife, a person who has lost all individuality and been completely reshaped by the demands of her husband (ugh...), a woman who glories in the stability and warmth of the family
life she has achieved. On the other hand, we have Y (silent part) who is the independant woman, who lives her life her own way and she is able, because of her independence to shape others to her personality, but who ultimately ends up alone, here, on Christmas Eve. Obviously these are stereotypes, but Strindberg's point is to set these two stereotypes off against each other, so that what is essentially a quarrel between two women, becomes a larger debate about the role of women in society.
You and Ms. Crain did a great job on this piece. I've just recently started reading Strindberg's lesser-known works (i.e. everything that's not 'Miss Julie') and was particularly impressed by this little work. I'll have to read it a few more times, because I've no clue who comes across as the 'stronger.' The acting alone could make this go either way. Thanks for posting this performance.
How intimate was your theatre? As Strindberg believed in naturalism, I understand that these smaller facial expressions would have been read, but I think I may be dealing with a slightly larger thrust, which could help AND hurt at the same time. Thoughts?
I am also intrigued with your thoughts on the role. I studied Miss Julie as well, and was hesitant to do this piece because I actually feel it is anti-feminist. Strindberg believed in Freudian Theory. To me this is a display of the "Hysteric Woman." I will have to re-read the play with your thoughts in mind, and see if I am any less conflicted. You wouldn't mind elaborating?
Very nice work. I loved watching this, and obviously both actresses spent a lot of time dedicated to this, and it shows. Lovely job. I'm directing this play at my school, so know some of the challenges of the roles.
Question. Did you guys change the script to different wording, or did it come like this? I loved the pacing of this.
tacolilygirl 2 months ago
would have been perfect with a better camera work - anyway great to watch, thank you!
Amus3d 8 months ago
nice music! I'm directing this at my school and very much enjoyed watching this! I plan to tape mine too!!!! some really nice choices
redlipstickchick 1 year ago
Bravo! Many thanks for uploading it.
CofradeArrepentido 1 year ago
This play must have been an influence for Bergman's Persona.
scienquist 1 year ago
Do anyone understand this at all because I sure don't. my teacher have us reading and researching this play and I truly do not understand it. Is this about two friends that were close at one point and the silent one is still missing with the husband behind closed doors and the one that keep running her mouth is knowing that he really is inlove with her and feels real stupid? I do not get it at all
Keisha9778hayes 2 years ago
the woman Mrs. X is just now realizing or actually truly beginning to feel the real relationship between Mrs. Y and her husband (which is an affair). She tries to be the bigger person....in stating the truth....but in reality its ironic because she is going back to her husband whom cheated on her in the first place. Mrs. X's husband morphed Mrs. X into Mrs. Y without Mrs. X not realizing it until now...it is confusing.
MKaytie 2 years ago
But the play is entirely ironic to what Mrs. X is trying to state being the stronger person is not always best. Its open to interpretation.
MKaytie 2 years ago
My name is Christina Dow and I play the silent part in this video. I agree, it's open to interpretation as to who is "The Stronger." With this play, August Strindberg captures wonderfully the duality of the role women play in society. In Mrs. X (Bret Crain, speaking role) we have the woman as caring mother and devoted wife, a person who has lost all individuality and been completely reshaped by the demands of her husband (ugh...), a woman who glories in the stability and warmth of the family
chrismdow 2 years ago 10
life she has achieved. On the other hand, we have Y (silent part) who is the independant woman, who lives her life her own way and she is able, because of her independence to shape others to her personality, but who ultimately ends up alone, here, on Christmas Eve. Obviously these are stereotypes, but Strindberg's point is to set these two stereotypes off against each other, so that what is essentially a quarrel between two women, becomes a larger debate about the role of women in society.
chrismdow 2 years ago 9
You and Ms. Crain did a great job on this piece. I've just recently started reading Strindberg's lesser-known works (i.e. everything that's not 'Miss Julie') and was particularly impressed by this little work. I'll have to read it a few more times, because I've no clue who comes across as the 'stronger.' The acting alone could make this go either way. Thanks for posting this performance.
cleomagoolando 1 year ago
I am looking into directing this play in the fall. I must say, I very much enjoyed this version, especially the choices with Y.
I have a few questions that I hope you can answer:
ethbjell 1 year ago
How intimate was your theatre? As Strindberg believed in naturalism, I understand that these smaller facial expressions would have been read, but I think I may be dealing with a slightly larger thrust, which could help AND hurt at the same time. Thoughts?
ethbjell 1 year ago
I am also intrigued with your thoughts on the role. I studied Miss Julie as well, and was hesitant to do this piece because I actually feel it is anti-feminist. Strindberg believed in Freudian Theory. To me this is a display of the "Hysteric Woman." I will have to re-read the play with your thoughts in mind, and see if I am any less conflicted. You wouldn't mind elaborating?
ethbjell 1 year ago
@ethbjell This play was published in 1890; Freud's Studies in Hysteria in 1895. Strindberg was, however, familiar with Charcot's work.
HConstantine 7 months ago
well done. could they have been friends or at least deeply empathetic? Or is that impossible?
tonymalibu 3 years ago