The Bloc were not actual signatories to the coalition, but through a side deal agreed not to vote down the coalition on confidence motions. So the Bloc was given veto power over the coalition's survival. Yes, Harper was evidently ready to do the same thing, or something very similar, but that does not make it right.
What a shameless, laughable piece of propaganda. It has been stated a million times that the Bloc will NOT have a part in the coalition; they will only support it. Also, Harper REALLY shouldn't run an ad that demonizes the Bloc-it royally pisses off the Quebecers, separatist and federalist alike, and especially when he was already having a hard time in Quebec. No mention of the NDP of course-I notice Jack Layton was cut out of the clip showing the signing of the coalition papers. xD
Yeah, I'd love to vote for Prime Minister, but you see I know how our parliamentary democracy works, and we never, ever get to vote for Prime Minister.
Look at the facts of how harpers budget would've eroded womans rights, civil workers ability to strike until 2011 and the funding of 1.95$ per vote to the political parties (which the conservatives dont need being the richest party [CORPORATE HANDOUTS FTW.])
Everyone who is commenting in favour of the coalition is either a conservative volunteer a bot or a really really ignorant individual.
We voted and 62% of us dont want harper. Support the 62% majority @ 62percentmajoritydotcom
So, the latest Conservative LIE is that Harper is like Obama so we should all support him. Get the fuck out of my face with that bullshit. Harper is a Bush Style Neo-Con in the pockets of the corporations. Everything that Harper has done is in lockstep with Bush's fascist activities.
This ad is only going to infuriate Quebec voters (who, contrary to popular belief, do not all vote for the Bloc because they want to separate), and anyone who realises that the NDP exists. The Canadian people overwhelmingly said no to Harper, they were just more divided on the issue of who else should be in charge. The coalition represents 62% of Canada. Oh, and westerners: Harper is actually from Toronto--he just couldn't sell his politics there.
Harper isn't Bush - Harper is Obama - only the people can take him to power and he has been PM with the longest minority government in HISTORY. Harper UNITES the Canadian people. The opposition egos can not stand that he is a man of principle who has stood up to them for the people of Canada.
STEPHEN HARPER AND THE CONSERVATIVES ARE FASCISTS! Know where our manufacturing base is? It's in Mexico, China and India because CONSERVATIVES like Harper and Mulroney sold out Canadaian workers so the corporations could make a bit more money by paying people in slave labor countries 5 cents an hour, 15 hours a day, 6 days a week. HARPER DOESN'T CARE ABOUT CANADA, HE ONLY CARES ABOUT HOLDING ONTO POWER AND IS ANOTHER GEORGE W. BUSH STYLE FASCIST!!!
Actually Obama and Harper are close in ideology. Bush is more in line with Jack Layton and the socialists. Massive spending and greater government control.
Which is why Harper looked up to Bush and is Jack Layton's mortal enemy? Jack Layton and Bush are as different as they come. While the NDP and Liberals would impose greater control over the economy (which is what has kept Canadian banks afloat despite the Conservative opposition to it--though they now take credit for our relative stability), the NDP vehemently opposes the social control that the right stands for (ie, Bush and Harper). Laissez fair economics vs libertarianism; apples and oranges.
I see that your mind is a victim of the Bush=Harper syndrome. Harper is closer to Obama, someone who you probably love to death. Canadian banks have keep Canadian banks "afloat" not the coalition, lol. On paper Bush and Layton are different, but both want huge bailouts from tax payers. Bush has nationalized some banks, Layton wants to nationalize parts of the economy. Similar to Chavez, kim jong il and Castro. That is why they can't seem to break through to become a party to be taken seriously.
Actually, the Liberals' past actions that the banks and Conservatives opposed are why the structure of our banking system is currently solid.
Bush nationalized banks out of desperation, not ideology, and was criticised by some of his supporters for it. Anyhow--care to explain what is actually bad about nationalization? The only explanation I hear from people is how it's bad because it's what "Evil liberal leftist communists" do, while showing no understanding of its effects.
lol, the banks in Canada have a more conservative strategy than their American and European counter parts, not because the government told them how to run their business, lol. Nationalization means that the state is in control and not the people. It goes against basic fundamental democracy. If you can't understand why the state should not run everything then I suggest you take a look at Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea to get an understanding. Maybe you could read into the Soviet Union too.
Ask your self that questions. If Canadians wanted Dion to be PM why didnt people vote for him in the election 2 months ago. Why? fuck this Conservative Ad..but ask WHY? if people really wanted Dion...why did he loose so badly?
If Dion win as PM through an election, good for him..but NOT the way he plans to become PM now when Canadians rejected him.
If Canadians truly wanted Dion as PM he would of won just 2 months ago and be the PM not Harper..but look..Harper is in charge..
"If Canadians wanted Dion to be PM why didnt people vote for him in the election 2 months ago"
Bogus argument, the progressive vote is split, the majority of canadians dont want the Bush lackey neocon Harper but have different views on who should take the lead. Because conservatives have unified the rightwing fruitcake base they can squeeze through the split to get seats they would not have a flying chance to get if there was one unified progressive party.
We don't know that. I hear on the news many Liberal MP's asking Dion to resign now but Dion won't comment on it. I hope in their meeting next week, ALL Liberal MP's Get Dion to step down.
Even Liberal MP's r saying Dion leading the coaltion and might be PM is not good considering Canadians already rejected him in the election 2 month ago.
Even the Liberal MP's know's that which is good. They understand what a lot of Canadians are thinking. Dion can not be PM. THANK YOU!! to all Liberal MP's
Liberals and their supporters are only just realizing the huge blunder they made. They are now between a rock and a hard place. If they try to form a coalition the GG will call an election and they will lose another 25 or so seats. The liberals created a circus. They can't even run their own party. The liberal theme song should be "Yakety Sacks".
The main fact is Dion SHOULD NOT BE Prime Minister!! We just had an federal election 2 months ago. If majority of people wanted Dion as a PM WHY?? didnt they vote for him?
Dion CAN NOT be PM the way he is doing it now, if Dion wants to be PM GO THROUGH AN ELECTION!! But WAIT!! we just had one and Dion was REJECTED!! badly!! by most Canadians
Liberal Party used to be #1 was the ONLY party tat could get a Majority and now look at them, cant even get a miniority government
PERFECT HARPER!! YOU GENIUS!! OK this is what you is what you do next.Implement the War Measures Act. Next you make a list of all the people who oppose you. you call up CISIS and tell them to blackbag them and send them to some Artic deathcamp. Next. you call up the military and declare martial law. Then you can crown yourself Emperor of Canada. ENJOY!
ahhh, the Bloc only support the coalition - they are NOT part of it. This is pure propaganda. Its a Liberal/NDP coalition until June.30.2011, with the voting support of the Bloc. period. Don't panic
i think think the opposition has no other choice but to turf this guy. stephen harper is hell bent on weakening the opposition at all costs, even if it means dividing the country. canada needs a leader who will unite the country, west central and quebec. this guy is a poor example and should be sent packing back to alberta. very poor political diplomatic skills.
Didn't we have an election recently? Didn't the Conservatives win? It's part of being a democracy. Why vote if thee clowns can "gang up" and discount how the election turned out. So you have not issue with your vote being tossed ...
Here in Quebec most people think that Duccepe is hurting himself with that coalition stuff
What's really going to hurt national unity is a PM who attacks what he calls ''seperatist'', which is about half the Quebec population. Not to mention that quebecers, even those that are federalist, don't tend to appreciate when a canadian politician attacks any quebecers, seperatist or not.
The Bloc were not actual signatories to the coalition, but through a side deal agreed not to vote down the coalition on confidence motions. So the Bloc was given veto power over the coalition's survival. Yes, Harper was evidently ready to do the same thing, or something very similar, but that does not make it right.
SnorkelNose 1 year ago
I dont like Dion though
Chslosers 2 years ago
What a shameless, laughable piece of propaganda. It has been stated a million times that the Bloc will NOT have a part in the coalition; they will only support it. Also, Harper REALLY shouldn't run an ad that demonizes the Bloc-it royally pisses off the Quebecers, separatist and federalist alike, and especially when he was already having a hard time in Quebec. No mention of the NDP of course-I notice Jack Layton was cut out of the clip showing the signing of the coalition papers. xD
TheLastMizzy 3 years ago
Yeah, I'd love to vote for Prime Minister, but you see I know how our parliamentary democracy works, and we never, ever get to vote for Prime Minister.
HardDazedKnight 3 years ago
um...howcome the ad didn't say anything about the NDP?
reiddw4 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Look at the facts of how harpers budget would've eroded womans rights, civil workers ability to strike until 2011 and the funding of 1.95$ per vote to the political parties (which the conservatives dont need being the richest party [CORPORATE HANDOUTS FTW.])
Everyone who is commenting in favour of the coalition is either a conservative volunteer a bot or a really really ignorant individual.
We voted and 62% of us dont want harper. Support the 62% majority @ 62percentmajoritydotcom
keklolgloat 3 years ago
So, the latest Conservative LIE is that Harper is like Obama so we should all support him. Get the fuck out of my face with that bullshit. Harper is a Bush Style Neo-Con in the pockets of the corporations. Everything that Harper has done is in lockstep with Bush's fascist activities.
CTM1978 3 years ago
Yes a vicious attack ad asking canadians if they shouldnt get to decide who is PM.
Mathesonguy 3 years ago
This ad is only going to infuriate Quebec voters (who, contrary to popular belief, do not all vote for the Bloc because they want to separate), and anyone who realises that the NDP exists. The Canadian people overwhelmingly said no to Harper, they were just more divided on the issue of who else should be in charge. The coalition represents 62% of Canada. Oh, and westerners: Harper is actually from Toronto--he just couldn't sell his politics there.
shokrone 3 years ago
Harper isn't Bush - Harper is Obama - only the people can take him to power and he has been PM with the longest minority government in HISTORY. Harper UNITES the Canadian people. The opposition egos can not stand that he is a man of principle who has stood up to them for the people of Canada.
mismit2 3 years ago
The government elected by the popular vote should get to stay in power. Harper has proven himself as a strong prime minister.
fuoifg86 3 years ago
STEPHEN HARPER AND THE CONSERVATIVES ARE FASCISTS! Know where our manufacturing base is? It's in Mexico, China and India because CONSERVATIVES like Harper and Mulroney sold out Canadaian workers so the corporations could make a bit more money by paying people in slave labor countries 5 cents an hour, 15 hours a day, 6 days a week. HARPER DOESN'T CARE ABOUT CANADA, HE ONLY CARES ABOUT HOLDING ONTO POWER AND IS ANOTHER GEORGE W. BUSH STYLE FASCIST!!!
CTM1978 3 years ago
Actually Obama and Harper are close in ideology. Bush is more in line with Jack Layton and the socialists. Massive spending and greater government control.
nakawick 3 years ago
Which is why Harper looked up to Bush and is Jack Layton's mortal enemy? Jack Layton and Bush are as different as they come. While the NDP and Liberals would impose greater control over the economy (which is what has kept Canadian banks afloat despite the Conservative opposition to it--though they now take credit for our relative stability), the NDP vehemently opposes the social control that the right stands for (ie, Bush and Harper). Laissez fair economics vs libertarianism; apples and oranges.
shokrone 3 years ago
I see that your mind is a victim of the Bush=Harper syndrome. Harper is closer to Obama, someone who you probably love to death. Canadian banks have keep Canadian banks "afloat" not the coalition, lol. On paper Bush and Layton are different, but both want huge bailouts from tax payers. Bush has nationalized some banks, Layton wants to nationalize parts of the economy. Similar to Chavez, kim jong il and Castro. That is why they can't seem to break through to become a party to be taken seriously.
nakawick 3 years ago 2
Actually, the Liberals' past actions that the banks and Conservatives opposed are why the structure of our banking system is currently solid.
Bush nationalized banks out of desperation, not ideology, and was criticised by some of his supporters for it. Anyhow--care to explain what is actually bad about nationalization? The only explanation I hear from people is how it's bad because it's what "Evil liberal leftist communists" do, while showing no understanding of its effects.
shokrone 3 years ago
lol, the banks in Canada have a more conservative strategy than their American and European counter parts, not because the government told them how to run their business, lol. Nationalization means that the state is in control and not the people. It goes against basic fundamental democracy. If you can't understand why the state should not run everything then I suggest you take a look at Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea to get an understanding. Maybe you could read into the Soviet Union too.
nakawick 3 years ago
Ask your self that questions. If Canadians wanted Dion to be PM why didnt people vote for him in the election 2 months ago. Why? fuck this Conservative Ad..but ask WHY? if people really wanted Dion...why did he loose so badly?
If Dion win as PM through an election, good for him..but NOT the way he plans to become PM now when Canadians rejected him.
If Canadians truly wanted Dion as PM he would of won just 2 months ago and be the PM not Harper..but look..Harper is in charge..
Rjinzo 3 years ago
"If Canadians wanted Dion to be PM why didnt people vote for him in the election 2 months ago"
Bogus argument, the progressive vote is split, the majority of canadians dont want the Bush lackey neocon Harper but have different views on who should take the lead. Because conservatives have unified the rightwing fruitcake base they can squeeze through the split to get seats they would not have a flying chance to get if there was one unified progressive party.
Plus Dion is on his way out
Rickdeckard2020 3 years ago
We don't know that. I hear on the news many Liberal MP's asking Dion to resign now but Dion won't comment on it. I hope in their meeting next week, ALL Liberal MP's Get Dion to step down.
Even Liberal MP's r saying Dion leading the coaltion and might be PM is not good considering Canadians already rejected him in the election 2 month ago.
Even the Liberal MP's know's that which is good. They understand what a lot of Canadians are thinking. Dion can not be PM. THANK YOU!! to all Liberal MP's
Rjinzo 3 years ago
Liberals and their supporters are only just realizing the huge blunder they made. They are now between a rock and a hard place. If they try to form a coalition the GG will call an election and they will lose another 25 or so seats. The liberals created a circus. They can't even run their own party. The liberal theme song should be "Yakety Sacks".
nakawick 3 years ago
The main fact is Dion SHOULD NOT BE Prime Minister!! We just had an federal election 2 months ago. If majority of people wanted Dion as a PM WHY?? didnt they vote for him?
Dion CAN NOT be PM the way he is doing it now, if Dion wants to be PM GO THROUGH AN ELECTION!! But WAIT!! we just had one and Dion was REJECTED!! badly!! by most Canadians
Liberal Party used to be #1 was the ONLY party tat could get a Majority and now look at them, cant even get a miniority government
Rjinzo 3 years ago
PERFECT HARPER!! YOU GENIUS!! OK this is what you is what you do next.Implement the War Measures Act. Next you make a list of all the people who oppose you. you call up CISIS and tell them to blackbag them and send them to some Artic deathcamp. Next. you call up the military and declare martial law. Then you can crown yourself Emperor of Canada. ENJOY!
Thunderthor1988 3 years ago
Free The West...keep western money in the west
cmxxtreme 3 years ago
ahhh, the Bloc only support the coalition - they are NOT part of it. This is pure propaganda. Its a Liberal/NDP coalition until June.30.2011, with the voting support of the Bloc. period. Don't panic
Derrick1909 3 years ago
pathetic propagandist video.
godfree2canada 3 years ago
Hey The voters are going to punish you liberals and NDP ers by voting with the Tories!
But we need a Majority Government anyways so maybe Dion making a fool out of himself on public TV is best for all of us!
Lets be a strong Canada united so the world can see us eh! And Harper is cool!
EF2000CanFly 3 years ago
i think think the opposition has no other choice but to turf this guy. stephen harper is hell bent on weakening the opposition at all costs, even if it means dividing the country. canada needs a leader who will unite the country, west central and quebec. this guy is a poor example and should be sent packing back to alberta. very poor political diplomatic skills.
chichibud31 3 years ago
"Shouldn't you get to decide?" Um, yeah. We did. 62% of us "Overwhelmingly" said no to the Conservative Party.
shokrone 3 years ago 2
Didn't we have an election recently? Didn't the Conservatives win? It's part of being a democracy. Why vote if thee clowns can "gang up" and discount how the election turned out. So you have not issue with your vote being tossed ...
msrret 3 years ago
I created a response to this on my page.
UnionStayshyn 3 years ago
that's bullshit
Here in Quebec most people think that Duccepe is hurting himself with that coalition stuff
What's really going to hurt national unity is a PM who attacks what he calls ''seperatist'', which is about half the Quebec population. Not to mention that quebecers, even those that are federalist, don't tend to appreciate when a canadian politician attacks any quebecers, seperatist or not.
tiersen1234 3 years ago 4
Lol separatists, there not going anywhere. Harper just owned himself.
Harper = Epic Fail
carbs101 3 years ago 4
nice way to regain the support of any opposition leader in the chamber.....
amyopacman 3 years ago 3
lol.
No mention of the NDP. And they also didn't mention that the majority of Canada (62%) "Overwhelming said No" to Harper.
hengeworks 3 years ago 5
Looks like the formula from the election ads hasn't changed. I'm guessing the 'sweater' may not make the cut this time around.
HHBudW 3 years ago 6
No mention of the NDP of course...only the Bloc. This is typcial Conservative advertising...trying to bullshit the Canadian public into obedience.
sonicboy19 3 years ago 5
Dump harper.
shameoncanada 3 years ago 5