Nothing that Venomfangx does would surprise me- this is the same little scumbag who said that amputees "don't deserve" their limbs. (Yes, he actually said that.) The idea that Venomfangx would make up allegations of pedophilia to smear someone is not in the least bit surprising.
im confused so you asked like a 21 year old to take her top off on blog tv and then venomfangx recorded the video. He exposed your name spread the video with people thinking your a pedafile? You now have venom's information? Why would you ask a girl to take her top off on blog tv in the first place that is just creepy if u like dont know the person. Is that what happened or am i wrong? Please help
I've heard that this kid is mentally ill from a lot of different sources now. Does anyone know with mental illness he was diagnosed with, and/or where that information was obtained?
Why don't any of you guys in a position to sue the fuck out of this fag do it? WTF? First Thunderfoot and now you? Just fucking burn him and be done with it.
he seemed like such a nice level headed man as well.
lol
I understood vfx's plight on youtube, albeit the wrong one; he was adamant he was doing something righteous and noble, which although I personally don't believe any of his videos, was in admiration of him for.
however, he started asking for money to preach, trying to illegally remove peoples videos, accusing people of paedophilia, I know he doesn't reflect all creationists, but it seems they all get desperate when confronted with facts.
This may be a strange comment-- but what is the name of the song in the background? Very impressive how you put the "climax" of the song at 2:03, the take-away message.
Can anyone tell me what the deal is with VenomfangX? I've seen his name spewed around everywhere, but I'm not involved enough with the Youtube community to know something about it.
He's an utter nutcase who spewed a bunch of religious hatred, got caught, kicked off Youtube, came back and repeated this cycle again and again. even went so far as to accuse Dr Jones here of being a pedophile.
@wikuk He posted misinformed videos such as 'Proof that god is real' and 'Proof that islam is evil'. Basically a spoiled, smug, moron creationist. He deleted all negative comments and disabled ratings after giving himself 5 stars. After years of intelligent people shooting him down and awful rebuttal attempts he finally left youtube.
VenomFangX began what I call "the First YouTube War". I can see this kind of thing happening between political and religious opposites in the future, those who have slunk below intellectual debate and started name-calling and making stuff up.
Actually, thunderf00t showed this to be part of using a loophole in which you send DMCAs, accuse someone falsely, and close your account. That BASTARD!
Anyone know why it keeps stopping at 1:16 even when the entire video is loaded up? Maybe I'm just lagging but I was wondering if this was also happening to anyone else.
The last I checked, the law states that the accuser must provide evidence of a crime, and if such accusations are false, they are a crime in themselves. Regardless he has every right to defend himself as he sees necessary.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The agreement between dprjones, thunderf00t and VenomFangX was that all VenomFangX material would be removed from their channel once he left YouTube. He has left YouTube. Hence, they must remove these videos or face legal action. Quid pro quo.
And you know this how? Perhaps you should watch the latest video before you go spouting nonsense. DPR will make a video soon that will disclose the terms.
I'm not sure where you get your infromation. Did you see Shawn's farewell video? No, not the one that ended with him calling DPRjones a pedophile.
The one after he, his family, DPR, Thunderf00t, and others had a discussion.
Shawn asked that videos that featured his old work to be removed. ASKED, and he even admitted he has no right to demand, so he ASKED. Further, he asked for them to be removed, because he didn't want to look at what he used to preach.
Does the site in question Update peoples profiles?. IE when you put your DOB does their system Also change your age you put when you first make said account?
I know a few site that do not!. In fact I know some that say for example one friend who is 23 now, but was 17 or 18 when he first got onto the site.
Maybe someone should check into that. just to make sure Profiles are updated by the person or the site itself?
All I want to say is that your restraint is admirable, DPR. VFX is revealing himself to be a despicable character, and appropriate responses ought to be taken.. but I trust you are already doing what you feel is appropriate. Vigilante style justice from me or others is not helpful.
I'm not taking sides because I don't know the story. I'm just curious if anyone knows why the girl's blogtv account says she's 17 if she's really not?
Because, as DPR clearly states in this post, Shawn misidentified her...the girl whose channel you looked at was not the girl who volunteered, without any prompting from DPR, to flash for charity.
watch the 4 pt series "A boy named Shawn" from xxxthepeachxxx
Oh and on morals for the bible thumpers. How come it is okay to do whatever you can to prove your god. Lie or make up facts, mine qoute people to fit you. Insult/cuss/belittle anyone with diffrent views. That seems to be fine by your god standards. Throw away your own commandments long as it helps your case!
Morals. I have seen Atheists with better morals.
Besides you are judging people by your bible, there are more faiths out there. and diffrent views on life. So stop pushing faith on us!
Maybe it deemed more appropriate in the UK E.g. the big brother is more exposed there than here and also we hated BB so much, the whole show had now cancelled because partly is the nudity!
No we don't have nudity in page 3 of our newspaper. It will get censorsed and complaints!
Maybe its a cultural thing, i guess maybe culturally UK is acceptable for her actions!!
Venomfangx is more sick that any man who gets a 17 year old , A 17 YEAR OLD to flash over the net. A person who gets a 17 y/o to strip is no better than a person who does the same to an 18 year old.
I'm surprised this VFX guy is not on the news for his little charity scam.
exactly! using boobs for charity work. how low can u sink huh? .... ? I mean is there anything more dispicable then boobs? let alone showing them to raise money for charity? ...?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You mean lots of old 40 year old men like to persuade 20 year girls young enough to be their daughters to strip ... for a charity event. Wow.. atheists and morals
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Who said I was ok with vfx falsely accusing him? are you dumb, can you read? What vfx did was in poor judgement, but he may have initially thought she was underaged. But I don't agree with what he did, because he didn't make sure first.. But a 40 year old creepy bald man persuading a 20 year old girl, young enough to be his daughter to strip in a charity event is ok with you?
i just found it funny that that was the only part you focused on. getting a woman to show her breasts for charity is a helluva lot better than getting barely legal girls drunk to make a cheesy video line. in the scheme of things, i think falsely accusing someone of being a pedophile is a lot worse than an adult man asking an adult woman to show her breasts. all vfx had to do was look at the woman's profile to see her age, so i think it was more of a case of malicious intent than poor judgment.
Sorry I won't agree with you on rationalizing what the creepy 40 year old bald man manipulating naive young 20 year old females for money gain. I don't know what VFX had in mind. He may have been worried that she was 17 from her looks, and acted in poor judgement by not being sure. But if he did act maliciously intentionally, then he is just as slimy as an old pervert manipulating young females on the internet for monetary gain.
um, she's an adult and can make her own decisions. he didn't trick her into doing it so i don't understand where you get he "manipulated her." there is a 24 year age difference between my in-laws. they married when my husband's mother was in her 20s. is my father in law a slimy pervert who "manipulated" her into an over 25 year marriage? your not going to convince me that falsely accusing someone of a crime like pedophilia is anywhere close to a man asking an adult woman to show her breasts.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
you're not going to convince me that having a creepy old bald dprjones guy manipulating young females to strip gain monetary gain is alright. So goodbye.
it was for charity = no monetary gain I doubt very seriously that you have a solid understanding of what "manipulating" means. Is it you find the female breast repulsive somehow? Do you find charity offensive? At what point would you allow women to make decisions?
Somehow I find these verses fitting.
Mathew 7:1-2 Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again
Maybe DprJones did poor judgement as well? I am sure you have passed Carwashes with girls wearing almost nothing! It was for a good cause. No one got hurt!
You can't have it both ways. You can't say what Vfx did is okay.
He clearly lied again He knew that girl was 20ish. Just like he lied and said people was after his family.
The boy lies (yes I mean BOY). Then hides behind his bible like it is okay!
So what he made a girl flash, He didnt break the law again like VFX!
Comments like this amaze me. The Bible is FULL of VERY old men with VERY young wives. God seems very ok with old bald 40 year olds doing alot more than seeing a 20 year olds tits. However he does seem to have a HUGE problem with bearing false witness and lying, I am pretty sure he wrote that down a few times on some rocks.
Today, the Sick Children's Hospital unveiled a new clinic for kids, complete with new toys, video games and flat-screened tvs in order to make their cancer treatment more barable.
This was possible thanks to charities, like the one Shawn was supposed to give to, but, instead chose to pocket the money for himself.
Well, he's slandering dprjones because dpr forced him to close his account.
But the DMCAs against dpr were probably because dpr made the "why do people hate you Venom". That video was hit by every other tactic (votebot, falseflag, etc) and they didn't work, so I guess Venom decided to eventually go all DMCA on him.
I agree, this sudden attack of DMCA on DPRJONES, the user that helped Thunderf00t win all those months ago, is beyond retarded, but I guess the DMCA was to get dprjones' PI.
Lemme explain; for ANYONE to record themselves exposing themselves or otherwise involving themselves in a sexual way the law states; very clearly, that the person has to be 18+.
The point is you are trying to distract everyone from the main point. this is discrimination at it's best. You cant say racism or racial profiling cause they omg both white but if they was not you seen people screaming!
Christains get away with whatever they want and I for one am sick and tired of it. they can claim whatever they want and nothing happans.
Its time do what happen to the samething to the westboro baptist church.. and show these people we are all not blind followers of a god
Flag it all you want You do know how to flag correct.
I like to see you prove hate?
someone defending themself is not hate, What it is was one yout cult followers of VFX who said
He dont believe in my god you must remove all videos waaah waaah!
Please! learn rules of Youtube or go ahead and flag him report him to the FBI. see how far it gets you. OH by the way the FBI and others dont take to kindly to following up on wild goose chases!
*yawn* I got a thumbs down because I politely offered my opinion that VFX should have been dealt with by the authorities rather than people on YouTube. Thanks for proving my point. ;)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I will reiterate that I do feel what VFX has done is deplorable and should be dealt with by the authorities accordingly. As it should have been in the first place. I just don't agree with the scores of people who have turned this whole debacle into a witch hunt. An act by the hands of those who, rather obnoxiously and arrogantly, purport themselves as being 'intellectually superior' to the so-called 'intellectually vacuous' theists.
I am afraid you are erronious in your comments Alex. This post from Jordanowen42 clearly explains that most, if not all, of the "athiest" community have shown Shawn nothing but compassion:
With all due respect, I don't find your statement to be true - at all. I have watched countless videos, over the course of the last two weeks, not to mention read comments using abusive (and in some cases, sick) epithets regarding VFX. There has been some compassion for VFX over the last couple of days, but certainly not by 'most' or 'all' of the theists as you claim. VFX has done wrong, there's no denying that, but he should have been dealt with by the authorities and left at that.
what i dont understand is that if i remember correctly dprjones said "i wanna see her bewbs", i would have thought that is different from directly asking her to publicly show her boobs. not to mention "bewbs" makes it sound more like a joke than a request =/
chances are she was probably thinking 'as soon as someone asks im gonna show ma boobz for grand lolz and attentiunz' like 15 mins of internet fame... maybe? cause that is pretty viral now.
Why did he sudenly start having it in for dprjones?
There was an ongoing saga with tf00t and TJ for a long tine, and granted I dont pay attention to this stuff anywhere near as much as I used to. But it seems kind of out of the blue.
who is this and why should anyone care its just an example of what you stick your nose into becomes a problem if you didnt see it you wouldnt care,think about that fuck!!
One massive flaw in this is the fact that Dprjones is in the UK, where the legal age is 16. Even if this girl was 17, she wouldn't be underage. Granted, it would still be creepy.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I agree with you. It's not illegal, but it's seriously unsavory and disrespectful. VFX should never have thrown the 'Paedo' word out so casually without checking for the girl's age first, but I honestly believe he genuinely thought she was underage. UK legal age is lower than the US'. As for the rest of the shit VFX has pulled, that should have been left with the *authorities* to deal with in the *first place*. Rather than this absurd witch hunt. They want blood, I guess?
Shawn deliberately blurred the name in the so-called uncensored link he posted, knowing full well that the lady in question was not whom he claimed it to be. The truly uncensored recording clearly shows her name in the co-host window. Part 3 of "A Boy Named Shawn" from xxxthepeachxxx reveals more detail, and Shawn knows EXACTLY who it really was.
Oh fuck off, she was in her 20's and he said ""i wanna see her bewbs" clearly as a joke during a blogothon (or some such) for charity iirc.
What's seriously unsavoury is trying to label somebody as a kiddie fiddler, there is almost literally nothing worse on this earth you can say about someone.
Witch hunt? What are you going on about? He's got off pretty much scott free after wasting a hell of alot of peoples time.
PCS is obviously too thick to realise that the age of consent in the UK is actually 16, so even if it was true that Mr Jones was making advances on a 17 year old, it wouldn't make him a pedophile or a lawbreaker.
Indeed, these various laws & ARBITRARY boundaries cause trouble for all involved. All countries should have the same age of consent to prevent confusion & exploitation.
(BTW, the adult star Lindsey Dawn Mackenzie started her career at 16, so did Fuko from Japan)
But Libel is Libel.
But I must ask, what was our esteemed colleague doing asking a grown woman such a question?! I would never saw such a thing, not even to my wife! I respect women too much!
Well, I don't know the answer to your question, but I will say: I too respect women, but that doesn't mean I wouldn't be interested in such a thing. Nor does it mean I wouldn't jest about it.
I say it's about time PCS faces consequences for his actions. He knows how DMCAs work by now and the pedophilia thng was a deliberate action to harm dprjones in any way he could, legal or illegal. He knew what he was doing. He should do some time behind bars, no excuses...
VFX doesn't understand that he's digging himself a much deeper hole than he already had. I cannot comprehend how he can be so oblvious to it. It almost seems like he's asking for major legal troubles. He doesn't understand that wrongful/false DMCA filing can not only get him the boot from Youtube, but also is classified as perjury in just about every country that Youtube is accessible from.
I think it should also be noted that even IF the girl had been underage it would change much as the legal consent age in dprjones' home country is 16 years old.
godistheway1299 might be the new account Shawn is using, and I have to say that after a couple of hours of browsing through videos related to the issue and reading the comments in all of them, the ones that
godistheway1299 has posted make the claim very reasonable.
There is no denying. both of you clowns that got emotionally upset with me saying this is like a soap opera and no one cares are ALSO the ones who uploaded vids on venomgay.
Coincidence? dont think so. im calling your nut sack hugging behaviour and it bothers the shit out of you because thats who you are bashing.
anyway, ive spent more than enough time on this retarded video and conversing with you obsessed clowns.
get a life you jokers. (dont think ill get your replies. notice is off)
DPR sue the hell out of that liar. He deserves it. He is begging for it. Srsly how many times do we have to be slapped in the face with our own olive branches before we learn? No matter how many atheists tried to help him, tried to support his rights to free speech and tried to support him against the supposedly unfair DMCAs he got, he still does things like this.
You're pretty narcissistic. First of all, nobody gives a shit what you do. Are you seeking attention by *trying* to piss people off? Because you're only making yourself look like a sad, pathetic no-life with nothing to do but troll the comments.
It's funny how he accused you of endangering him and his family and he's ACTUALLY endangering you now...hypocrite.
But dprjones, without providing further information, how are we to know if you are being truthful? I wouldn't suggest disclosing PCS's personal info, but how about a very publicized suit for libel?
You are a first class human being for telling people to not use venom's actions as an excuse to publish personal info about him.
KingOystar 3 weeks ago
Wow this is so cool to follow!! Sad i came in 2012
madridisinSpain 1 month ago
Even if she was 17 the age of consent in the uk is 16 so it still wouldn't be pedophilia.
MetalBru01 3 months ago
If I was a policeman, I'd be far more concerned with 'VenomFangX' than 'dprjones'.
Who in his right mind would go by the moniker 'VenomFangX' on YouTube?
He's either joking, or he's crazy.
dingodavid 4 months ago
Paedophilia? Is he kidding?
That's a low blow. He must have been desperate.
dingodavid 4 months ago
I think you should have sued Venomfangx!
KingOystar 5 months ago
Nothing that Venomfangx does would surprise me- this is the same little scumbag who said that amputees "don't deserve" their limbs. (Yes, he actually said that.) The idea that Venomfangx would make up allegations of pedophilia to smear someone is not in the least bit surprising.
mikefromwa 6 months ago
Even if DPR did ask a 17 year old girl to reveal her breasts the age of consent in the uk is 17 anyway so it's hardly pedophillia!
MetalBru01 7 months ago
I guess since Venomfangx returned, Dprjones decided to bring all these videos back. :/
They seemed to be on good terms when they all had that skype conversation; I guess there's been a breakdown since then.
YodatheJedi12 8 months ago
wow, venom's a tool....
No, he's a toolshed!
baluvxaluv 1 year ago
im confused so you asked like a 21 year old to take her top off on blog tv and then venomfangx recorded the video. He exposed your name spread the video with people thinking your a pedafile? You now have venom's information? Why would you ask a girl to take her top off on blog tv in the first place that is just creepy if u like dont know the person. Is that what happened or am i wrong? Please help
gounc93 1 year ago
Pwned.
CrixMakin 1 year ago
Pwned.
CrixMakin 1 year ago
lol from school
esfelectra 1 year ago
I've heard that this kid is mentally ill from a lot of different sources now. Does anyone know with mental illness he was diagnosed with, and/or where that information was obtained?
BrassBull13 1 year ago
@BrassBull13 Yes, it is called Sky-Daddy Delusion Disorder.
holio84 1 year ago 3
@holio84 Haha! Ok I'm totally using that.
ikutsu2001 1 year ago
Why don't any of you guys in a position to sue the fuck out of this fag do it? WTF? First Thunderfoot and now you? Just fucking burn him and be done with it.
MaicoMoon 1 year ago
he seemed like such a nice level headed man as well.
lol
I understood vfx's plight on youtube, albeit the wrong one; he was adamant he was doing something righteous and noble, which although I personally don't believe any of his videos, was in admiration of him for.
however, he started asking for money to preach, trying to illegally remove peoples videos, accusing people of paedophilia, I know he doesn't reflect all creationists, but it seems they all get desperate when confronted with facts.
gavsmith1980 1 year ago 3
the song, is it Concierto De Aranjuez from Rodrigo?
Blamefulrednas 1 year ago
This guy should be in prison. I mean seriously. He's just a total FUCKTARD. I want to fucking strangle him.
UnitedArabia55 2 years ago 17
That guy is a wanker.
Person1036 2 years ago
This may be a strange comment-- but what is the name of the song in the background? Very impressive how you put the "climax" of the song at 2:03, the take-away message.
PaninaroAurora 2 years ago
Can anyone tell me what the deal is with VenomfangX? I've seen his name spewed around everywhere, but I'm not involved enough with the Youtube community to know something about it.
wikuk 2 years ago
@wikuk
Just google it! I think he's on wikianswers!
bananabread119 2 years ago
He's an utter nutcase who spewed a bunch of religious hatred, got caught, kicked off Youtube, came back and repeated this cycle again and again. even went so far as to accuse Dr Jones here of being a pedophile.
TheSignalComes 2 years ago
dumbasses - they polute 50 percent of america maybe more
rez6457 2 years ago
You do know that Venomfangx is Canadian right?
humkina 2 years ago
He meant religious nutballs, not just Venomfangx.
TheSignalComes 1 year ago
read my profile for the sordid story
themsfightinwoids 2 years ago
@wikuk He posted misinformed videos such as 'Proof that god is real' and 'Proof that islam is evil'. Basically a spoiled, smug, moron creationist. He deleted all negative comments and disabled ratings after giving himself 5 stars. After years of intelligent people shooting him down and awful rebuttal attempts he finally left youtube.
JimboWizbo 1 year ago
I presume that PCS goes to Tyndale "University" College and Seminary, since it's in Toronto. Would that be right?
Gnickk 2 years ago
Youtube World War 1
There were too many casualties too count
XHxCNinjaX1 2 years ago
Venom really is a scum bag. His arguments are full of lies, and now he does this. What a dick!
0121ryanh117 2 years ago
Damn this guy rocked the floor with him subbed...
CaptainAmerica35 2 years ago
What is the background music?
darkhyena 2 years ago
The fundamentalist hate monger now known as BroJustin has posted a defense of venomfangx called the Atheist Savage. Do watch.
psyentologysux 2 years ago
BroJustin is a total twit and censors all. Not worth watching.
themsfightinwoids 2 years ago
VenomFangX began what I call "the First YouTube War". I can see this kind of thing happening between political and religious opposites in the future, those who have slunk below intellectual debate and started name-calling and making stuff up.
Jarut195 2 years ago
Lol, he still looked at bewbs, which is pretty non-christian.
Also, dpr sounds British, so 17 is fair game.
1337brit 2 years ago
VFX - What a ball-sucking sack of shit.
MethodicalMadness 2 years ago
even IF she was 17. its legal? so go fuck urselfs? bitchy ass trollers i troll u backz
NR1animefan 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
liar your a pediphial u sick pig.
isaacM1979 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you disgusting man dpr jones cradle robber
sindinicon13 2 years ago
He closed his account and has gone. No more issues now.
SatanFangX 2 years ago 14
Actually, thunderf00t showed this to be part of using a loophole in which you send DMCAs, accuse someone falsely, and close your account. That BASTARD!
justforflag2 2 years ago
@SatanFangX He came back.
KingMKLA 1 year ago
Anyone know why it keeps stopping at 1:16 even when the entire video is loaded up? Maybe I'm just lagging but I was wondering if this was also happening to anyone else.
TheChristianCanadian 2 years ago
dprjones, keep this video on for as long as YouTube is in business to show the world what liars and hypocrites will stoop to
rastarigate 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dprjones must remove this video immediately.
1concernedchristian 2 years ago
Why should he?
The last I checked, the law states that the accuser must provide evidence of a crime, and if such accusations are false, they are a crime in themselves. Regardless he has every right to defend himself as he sees necessary.
Grospoliner 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The agreement between dprjones, thunderf00t and VenomFangX was that all VenomFangX material would be removed from their channel once he left YouTube. He has left YouTube. Hence, they must remove these videos or face legal action. Quid pro quo.
1concernedchristian 2 years ago
@1concernedchristian
And you know this how? Perhaps you should watch the latest video before you go spouting nonsense. DPR will make a video soon that will disclose the terms.
Or perhaps you are Nostradamus reincarnated?
Perhaps....
Oddwick 2 years ago
@1concerendchristian
I'm not sure where you get your infromation. Did you see Shawn's farewell video? No, not the one that ended with him calling DPRjones a pedophile.
The one after he, his family, DPR, Thunderf00t, and others had a discussion.
Shawn asked that videos that featured his old work to be removed. ASKED, and he even admitted he has no right to demand, so he ASKED. Further, he asked for them to be removed, because he didn't want to look at what he used to preach.
XeliosX 2 years ago
The question should be as this?
Does the site in question Update peoples profiles?. IE when you put your DOB does their system Also change your age you put when you first make said account?
I know a few site that do not!. In fact I know some that say for example one friend who is 23 now, but was 17 or 18 when he first got onto the site.
Maybe someone should check into that. just to make sure Profiles are updated by the person or the site itself?
caterus 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Typical Christian persecution at its finest. Dprjones, you should be ashamed of yourself.
SaviorChrist2009 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Typical Christian persecution at its finest. Dprjones, you should be ashamed of yourself.
SaviorChrist2009 2 years ago
@SaviorChrist2009
"Christian persecution at its finest"
LOL you forget it was the nut case shawn that defame dprjones.
I wonder what shawns school would think of him doing that from their computers?
Should I find out?
gorilla199uncensored 2 years ago 3
Christian persecution (at least in western countries) ended when rome turned into christian. That was the start of persecution by christians.
69soulstone 2 years ago 3
All I want to say is that your restraint is admirable, DPR. VFX is revealing himself to be a despicable character, and appropriate responses ought to be taken.. but I trust you are already doing what you feel is appropriate. Vigilante style justice from me or others is not helpful.
NomadSoul76 2 years ago 2
I'm not taking sides because I don't know the story. I'm just curious if anyone knows why the girl's blogtv account says she's 17 if she's really not?
LtCmdrVi 2 years ago
Because, as DPR clearly states in this post, Shawn misidentified her...the girl whose channel you looked at was not the girl who volunteered, without any prompting from DPR, to flash for charity.
watch the 4 pt series "A boy named Shawn" from xxxthepeachxxx
cansurfer1 2 years ago
@cansurfer1 Okay. Sorry, I guess I just didn't understand the video, and I didn't watch the others. Thank you.
LtCmdrVi 2 years ago
anytime fellow youtuber...glad I could help you out....check out this mornings post from DPR...and thanks for the thanks...:)
cansurfer1 2 years ago
@LtCmdrVi
"account says she's 17 if she's really not? "
Really is that what it says?
Jones knew she was older than 17, so he is still in the clear.
gorilla199uncensored 2 years ago
Wow...this bit sounds familiar....
"Ultimatums is a form of blackmail and (dprjones|thunderf00t) wouldn't stand a chance in court."
Hey, are you painted up like the Joker again, Shawn?
"Bottom line is venomfangx was bullied off Youtube and we will never forget it."
Nobody remembers you being 'bullied'...but they do remember you mocking amputees and stealing from the kids hospital.
LordCustos3 2 years ago 2
Oh and on morals for the bible thumpers. How come it is okay to do whatever you can to prove your god. Lie or make up facts, mine qoute people to fit you. Insult/cuss/belittle anyone with diffrent views. That seems to be fine by your god standards. Throw away your own commandments long as it helps your case!
Morals. I have seen Atheists with better morals.
Besides you are judging people by your bible, there are more faiths out there. and diffrent views on life. So stop pushing faith on us!
caterus 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Did the girl actually reveal her breasts?
I'm sorry i don't find asking girls to reveal their breast on a webcam deemed to be appropriate!
gerjaison 2 years ago
did you not watch the video above or are you deaf?
it was for charity btw
robthesamplist 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He never firmly admitted it, so i take your word as a YES and the girl did reveal her breast.
I personally don't really care but I wouldn't think its appropriate asking anybody to reveal themselve for ANYTHING (inc charity)!!
gerjaison 2 years ago
she agreed to show if theyy reached a certain amount of donations which i feel is fine .
your opinion is fine but it sounds like you have issues, goto a nudist beach or something and reflect or open a newspaper and look at page 3.
robthesamplist 2 years ago
Maybe it deemed more appropriate in the UK E.g. the big brother is more exposed there than here and also we hated BB so much, the whole show had now cancelled because partly is the nudity!
No we don't have nudity in page 3 of our newspaper. It will get censorsed and complaints!
Maybe its a cultural thing, i guess maybe culturally UK is acceptable for her actions!!
gerjaison 2 years ago
Venomfangx is more sick that any man who gets a 17 year old , A 17 YEAR OLD to flash over the net. A person who gets a 17 y/o to strip is no better than a person who does the same to an 18 year old.
I'm surprised this VFX guy is not on the news for his little charity scam.
mrsexappeal69 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Oh then that just makes you dprjones a freaking dirty pervert not a Pedophile!! Your still a pig.
dann551 2 years ago
@dann551
From what I've seen, VenomFangX is worse than any pervert.
Diablocazador 2 years ago 5
exactly! using boobs for charity work. how low can u sink huh? .... ? I mean is there anything more dispicable then boobs? let alone showing them to raise money for charity? ...?
MWcrazyhorse 2 years ago
Music sounds like the town music from diablo, though obviously not so.
Oh, and VFX is a tosser.
dutchvigilante 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yes a bald 40 year old telling a 20 year old to show her tits is not slightly creepy or weird
audisport 2 years ago
What's weird about it? Loads of adult men find adult women attractive.
quasarsphere 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You mean lots of old 40 year old men like to persuade 20 year girls young enough to be their daughters to strip ... for a charity event. Wow.. atheists and morals
audisport 2 years ago
An adult woman can show her breasts to anyone she chooses. She was not in any way forced.
When you have stopped condoning the bearing of false witness, then you can start talking about morals.
Adult man + adult woman = no crime.
quasarsphere 2 years ago 5
Yeah, he should have done what other paragons of Christianity have done instead.
Have sex with a male prostitute while on a crystal meth binge.
Stopwatch49 2 years ago 4
so then i guess you're ok with vfx falsely accusing an innocent man of pedophilia. wow...christians and morals
dolphin8402 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Who said I was ok with vfx falsely accusing him? are you dumb, can you read? What vfx did was in poor judgement, but he may have initially thought she was underaged. But I don't agree with what he did, because he didn't make sure first.. But a 40 year old creepy bald man persuading a 20 year old girl, young enough to be his daughter to strip in a charity event is ok with you?
audisport 2 years ago
i just found it funny that that was the only part you focused on. getting a woman to show her breasts for charity is a helluva lot better than getting barely legal girls drunk to make a cheesy video line. in the scheme of things, i think falsely accusing someone of being a pedophile is a lot worse than an adult man asking an adult woman to show her breasts. all vfx had to do was look at the woman's profile to see her age, so i think it was more of a case of malicious intent than poor judgment.
dolphin8402 2 years ago 2
Sorry I won't agree with you on rationalizing what the creepy 40 year old bald man manipulating naive young 20 year old females for money gain. I don't know what VFX had in mind. He may have been worried that she was 17 from her looks, and acted in poor judgement by not being sure. But if he did act maliciously intentionally, then he is just as slimy as an old pervert manipulating young females on the internet for monetary gain.
audisport 2 years ago
um, she's an adult and can make her own decisions. he didn't trick her into doing it so i don't understand where you get he "manipulated her." there is a 24 year age difference between my in-laws. they married when my husband's mother was in her 20s. is my father in law a slimy pervert who "manipulated" her into an over 25 year marriage? your not going to convince me that falsely accusing someone of a crime like pedophilia is anywhere close to a man asking an adult woman to show her breasts.
dolphin8402 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you're not going to convince me that having a creepy old bald dprjones guy manipulating young females to strip gain monetary gain is alright. So goodbye.
audisport 2 years ago
it was for charity = no monetary gain I doubt very seriously that you have a solid understanding of what "manipulating" means. Is it you find the female breast repulsive somehow? Do you find charity offensive? At what point would you allow women to make decisions?
Somehow I find these verses fitting.
Mathew 7:1-2 Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again
You are the creep here.
thejonax 2 years ago 2
WUAHAHAHAHA
CreationDebunked 2 years ago
@Audisport >.>
Maybe DprJones did poor judgement as well? I am sure you have passed Carwashes with girls wearing almost nothing! It was for a good cause. No one got hurt!
You can't have it both ways. You can't say what Vfx did is okay.
He clearly lied again He knew that girl was 20ish. Just like he lied and said people was after his family.
The boy lies (yes I mean BOY). Then hides behind his bible like it is okay!
So what he made a girl flash, He didnt break the law again like VFX!
caterus 2 years ago
Comments like this amaze me. The Bible is FULL of VERY old men with VERY young wives. God seems very ok with old bald 40 year olds doing alot more than seeing a 20 year olds tits. However he does seem to have a HUGE problem with bearing false witness and lying, I am pretty sure he wrote that down a few times on some rocks.
wormbaby79 2 years ago 2
You read the satanic bible. And you love making excuses for "the bald 40 year olds" dprjones seeing 20 year old tits.
audisport 2 years ago
Today, the Sick Children's Hospital unveiled a new clinic for kids, complete with new toys, video games and flat-screened tvs in order to make their cancer treatment more barable.
This was possible thanks to charities, like the one Shawn was supposed to give to, but, instead chose to pocket the money for himself.
Azzaelea 2 years ago
Put this motherfucker in jail... Venomfangx that is.
He's in waaaaaaaay over the top now.
This wont end nice. Someone has to be taught a lesson about crime and punishment.
smartarse001 2 years ago
Yeah, you, lelelel.
Abbiestp 2 years ago
Well, he's slandering dprjones because dpr forced him to close his account.
But the DMCAs against dpr were probably because dpr made the "why do people hate you Venom". That video was hit by every other tactic (votebot, falseflag, etc) and they didn't work, so I guess Venom decided to eventually go all DMCA on him.
I agree, this sudden attack of DMCA on DPRJONES, the user that helped Thunderf00t win all those months ago, is beyond retarded, but I guess the DMCA was to get dprjones' PI.
ManlySlut 2 years ago 2
Maybe I'm a little naive, but isn't 16 the age of consent?
missfying 2 years ago
For sex, you muppet.
Abbiestp 2 years ago
And this was...?
missfying 2 years ago
Lemme explain; for ANYONE to record themselves exposing themselves or otherwise involving themselves in a sexual way the law states; very clearly, that the person has to be 18+.
Now stop wasting my time.
smartarse001 2 years ago
The point is you are trying to distract everyone from the main point. this is discrimination at it's best. You cant say racism or racial profiling cause they omg both white but if they was not you seen people screaming!
Christains get away with whatever they want and I for one am sick and tired of it. they can claim whatever they want and nothing happans.
Its time do what happen to the samething to the westboro baptist church.. and show these people we are all not blind followers of a god
caterus 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FLAGGED
This video incites hate and dprjones is a sick, depraved, melelvolent monster for uploading this. Shawn has left, leave him be.
godistheway1299 2 years ago
Flag it all you want You do know how to flag correct.
I like to see you prove hate?
someone defending themself is not hate, What it is was one yout cult followers of VFX who said
He dont believe in my god you must remove all videos waaah waaah!
Please! learn rules of Youtube or go ahead and flag him report him to the FBI. see how far it gets you. OH by the way the FBI and others dont take to kindly to following up on wild goose chases!
Course then again who am I to say.
Good Luck
caterus 2 years ago 2
What a silly spoilt child he is.
Goodbye VFX, you wont be missed.
MarcusCardiff 2 years ago
*yawn* I got a thumbs down because I politely offered my opinion that VFX should have been dealt with by the authorities rather than people on YouTube. Thanks for proving my point. ;)
AlexDeLarge1973 2 years ago
I can't watch the movie for some reason. It gets to 1:16, then stops.
Seera8472 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I will reiterate that I do feel what VFX has done is deplorable and should be dealt with by the authorities accordingly. As it should have been in the first place. I just don't agree with the scores of people who have turned this whole debacle into a witch hunt. An act by the hands of those who, rather obnoxiously and arrogantly, purport themselves as being 'intellectually superior' to the so-called 'intellectually vacuous' theists.
AlexDeLarge1973 2 years ago
I am afraid you are erronious in your comments Alex. This post from Jordanowen42 clearly explains that most, if not all, of the "athiest" community have shown Shawn nothing but compassion:
/watch?v=S_nd_fko2Sw
cansurfer1 2 years ago
With all due respect, I don't find your statement to be true - at all. I have watched countless videos, over the course of the last two weeks, not to mention read comments using abusive (and in some cases, sick) epithets regarding VFX. There has been some compassion for VFX over the last couple of days, but certainly not by 'most' or 'all' of the theists as you claim. VFX has done wrong, there's no denying that, but he should have been dealt with by the authorities and left at that.
AlexDeLarge1973 2 years ago
FUCK YOU! He started this shit and now he must accept the consequences.
There's nothing "intellectually superior" about that.
FUCK YOU! Once again.
smartarse001 2 years ago
Venomfangx rears his advice under the small print.
RandomCommentCreator 2 years ago
what i dont understand is that if i remember correctly dprjones said "i wanna see her bewbs", i would have thought that is different from directly asking her to publicly show her boobs. not to mention "bewbs" makes it sound more like a joke than a request =/
chances are she was probably thinking 'as soon as someone asks im gonna show ma boobz for grand lolz and attentiunz' like 15 mins of internet fame... maybe? cause that is pretty viral now.
UnlabelledX 2 years ago
I have a question.
Why did he sudenly start having it in for dprjones?
There was an ongoing saga with tf00t and TJ for a long tine, and granted I dont pay attention to this stuff anywhere near as much as I used to. But it seems kind of out of the blue.
Or is it to do with his father?
scotsocool 2 years ago
I can only see to about 1:00, where you say the girl is in her 20s. Then it freezes
Lallapalalable 2 years ago
godistheway1299:
You have NO proof those messages came from Shawn. They could have come from someone else at my school.
I reposted this comment because he removed it, thought it should get re-uploaded for the lulz.
ManlySlut 2 years ago 6
who is this and why should anyone care its just an example of what you stick your nose into becomes a problem if you didnt see it you wouldnt care,think about that fuck!!
sidewaysjsideways 2 years ago
Wow, PCS truly has sunk to a new level, what an asshole, SRSLY.
opethfan92 2 years ago
One massive flaw in this is the fact that Dprjones is in the UK, where the legal age is 16. Even if this girl was 17, she wouldn't be underage. Granted, it would still be creepy.
Kilgorin10 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I agree with you. It's not illegal, but it's seriously unsavory and disrespectful. VFX should never have thrown the 'Paedo' word out so casually without checking for the girl's age first, but I honestly believe he genuinely thought she was underage. UK legal age is lower than the US'. As for the rest of the shit VFX has pulled, that should have been left with the *authorities* to deal with in the *first place*. Rather than this absurd witch hunt. They want blood, I guess?
AlexDeLarge1973 2 years ago
then you have fallen for a load Alex.
Shawn deliberately blurred the name in the so-called uncensored link he posted, knowing full well that the lady in question was not whom he claimed it to be. The truly uncensored recording clearly shows her name in the co-host window. Part 3 of "A Boy Named Shawn" from xxxthepeachxxx reveals more detail, and Shawn knows EXACTLY who it really was.
cansurfer1 2 years ago
Oh fuck off, she was in her 20's and he said ""i wanna see her bewbs" clearly as a joke during a blogothon (or some such) for charity iirc.
What's seriously unsavoury is trying to label somebody as a kiddie fiddler, there is almost literally nothing worse on this earth you can say about someone.
Witch hunt? What are you going on about? He's got off pretty much scott free after wasting a hell of alot of peoples time.
BooMeRLiNSKi 2 years ago 4
Kilgorin10: What's so creepy about it?
HispanicIsNotARace1 2 years ago
To be honest, nothing really. It's obviously VenomFangX scraping the bottom of the tin for something to use against him.
Kilgorin10 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
5 stars, favorited, supported
bbatnorsborg 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
1 star,flagged,reported
xxxMomoVanityxxx 2 years ago
-1. :)
Kilgorin10 2 years ago
Why?
Zoiros85 2 years ago
@xxxMomoVanityxxx um if you like to care about this so much try doing positive instead of feeding negative
sidewaysjsideways 2 years ago
PCS is obviously too thick to realise that the age of consent in the UK is actually 16, so even if it was true that Mr Jones was making advances on a 17 year old, it wouldn't make him a pedophile or a lawbreaker.
Guncriminal 2 years ago
Indeed, these various laws & ARBITRARY boundaries cause trouble for all involved. All countries should have the same age of consent to prevent confusion & exploitation.
(BTW, the adult star Lindsey Dawn Mackenzie started her career at 16, so did Fuko from Japan)
But Libel is Libel.
But I must ask, what was our esteemed colleague doing asking a grown woman such a question?! I would never saw such a thing, not even to my wife! I respect women too much!
capnjonas 2 years ago
I can't believe YouTube keeps letting the same guy, "VenomFangX" to set up channels!
Would they let terrorists from 'u no where' use the same name & spread the same hate message? Or NeoNazis?
Of course not! But if it's 'Christians' or 'Scientologists', YouTube keeps giving them chances & letting them break the law.
*shakes head*
Damn YouTube, why are we still suffering so?!
capnjonas 2 years ago
Well, I don't know the answer to your question, but I will say: I too respect women, but that doesn't mean I wouldn't be interested in such a thing. Nor does it mean I wouldn't jest about it.
HitodamaKyrie 2 years ago
haaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
why is this so funny?
LauderdaleBaptist 2 years ago
Huh....
This video freezes on my at 1:18
somecomputergeek 2 years ago
Mine does too
loofahbox 2 years ago
@loofahbox
I reloaded the page and moved the little circle thingy to 1:20 and all was well.
somecomputergeek 2 years ago
Yarr. Failtube.
loofahbox 2 years ago
I say it's about time PCS faces consequences for his actions. He knows how DMCAs work by now and the pedophilia thng was a deliberate action to harm dprjones in any way he could, legal or illegal. He knew what he was doing. He should do some time behind bars, no excuses...
tommytalks77 2 years ago
Sue his ass ASAP. He is a hypocrite for giving out your personal information thereby threatening your own safety and life.
jetblack297 2 years ago
@jetblack297
He has attempted to soil your reputation by labeling you as a pedophile without any liable proof. Charge him with defamation of character.
jetblack297 2 years ago
VFX doesn't understand that he's digging himself a much deeper hole than he already had. I cannot comprehend how he can be so oblvious to it. It almost seems like he's asking for major legal troubles. He doesn't understand that wrongful/false DMCA filing can not only get him the boot from Youtube, but also is classified as perjury in just about every country that Youtube is accessible from.
godomotfronksezi 2 years ago
i cant get the video to play past 1:16
mephiskapheles6 2 years ago
@mephiskapheles6 put "&fmt=18" at the end of the URL, then it should work.
godomotfronksezi 2 years ago
wow.... 40k+ views...
Paxmax 2 years ago
It's over 9000!!!!!!111oneone
NichtDieseTone 2 years ago
Are you sure we should let Shawn get away with this?
We can't allow him to take advantage of our forgiveness. he'll just try to vilify Dprjones or someone like him again!
Shawn should have been institutionalized or imprisoned.
RyunSharp 2 years ago
Where can I see the boobs video?
ajuk1 2 years ago 2
I think it should also be noted that even IF the girl had been underage it would change much as the legal consent age in dprjones' home country is 16 years old.
swordhunter12 2 years ago
I'ts 13 in japan... Good luck trying to prosecute a japanese!
NichtDieseTone 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For the truth about venomfangx:
/watch?v=S_nd_fko2Sw
Even his parents disagree with his actions and his worldview. Kid needs help.
BuBBaGump014 2 years ago 3
Some people are claiming that user name
godistheway1299 might be the new account Shawn is using, and I have to say that after a couple of hours of browsing through videos related to the issue and reading the comments in all of them, the ones that
godistheway1299 has posted make the claim very reasonable.
dioseolo 2 years ago 3
What a vile little turd!
Jacksonstreet71 2 years ago
Dude... dude...
Im sorry this happened to you...
dude
that was low... come on venom... don't be a buddy fucker
Press charge for slander
Kingucktoad 2 years ago 3
lol when ppl come back to anything LMFAO "IM BACK"!!!
murrymurrymurrymurry 2 years ago
VenomfangX is back his new name is godistheway1299..............
senorcardgage678 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is no denying. both of you clowns that got emotionally upset with me saying this is like a soap opera and no one cares are ALSO the ones who uploaded vids on venomgay.
Coincidence? dont think so. im calling your nut sack hugging behaviour and it bothers the shit out of you because thats who you are bashing.
anyway, ive spent more than enough time on this retarded video and conversing with you obsessed clowns.
get a life you jokers. (dont think ill get your replies. notice is off)
angryaznman 2 years ago
Yeah, I'll try to "get a life". Thanks for fucking off. Byebye, sad troll.
ASTCify 2 years ago
Venomfangx should be sued and ass-raped in prison. He'd love that though cause he's a closet faggot.
harmfulifconsumed 2 years ago 3
VFX should go to Hell.He really does deserve it,since he's proven himself irredeemable with this stunt
gallileotheguineapig 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i feel like im talking to children who believe in santa.
yes, im telling the truth just out of spite. because its so clear how badly you guys care about this nonsense.
bursting your bubbles is just fun.
face it, none of this is important. not this non name, not venom, not creationists, not atheists.
you all just convinced yourselves it means something with the spamming of this retarded vids.
there are vids about guys falling on their asses that get more views and subs.
truth hurts.
angryaznman 2 years ago
DPR sue the hell out of that liar. He deserves it. He is begging for it. Srsly how many times do we have to be slapped in the face with our own olive branches before we learn? No matter how many atheists tried to help him, tried to support his rights to free speech and tried to support him against the supposedly unfair DMCAs he got, he still does things like this.
take him down.
whatsafugazi 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
hahaha the losers who actually think this drama queen matters is mad cause im pointing out the truth.
sorry, only you clowns who cant get off venomfangx's nut sack care about this shit.
truth hurts.
angryaznman 2 years ago
@angryaznman
I'm not mad. So you're wrong on that.
You haven't put forth any "truth". What exactly are trying to convey?
Well, we care, and you don't. I still don't see why you're here. Are you just very lonely? =< aww, how sad. poor troll....
ASTCify 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ASTCify
whos "we"? the other clowns who follow this clown?
or the clowns like you specifically you ALSO make retarded vids on venom. who the hell would waste their time making vids to bash another youtuber.
you can try and spin this however you want, but ID NEVER MAKE A VID ON YOU OR ANYONE HERE hahaha.
just not that important to me.
angryaznman 2 years ago
You're pretty narcissistic. First of all, nobody gives a shit what you do. Are you seeking attention by *trying* to piss people off? Because you're only making yourself look like a sad, pathetic no-life with nothing to do but troll the comments.
ASTCify 2 years ago
It's funny how he accused you of endangering him and his family and he's ACTUALLY endangering you now...hypocrite.
But dprjones, without providing further information, how are we to know if you are being truthful? I wouldn't suggest disclosing PCS's personal info, but how about a very publicized suit for libel?
bp061271 2 years ago