I lost all respect for Jon Stewart when he mocked people for doubting the government's recent Bin Laden fable. These despicable writers obviously have no interest in the truth.
rory albanese douche extraordinaire and scum galore. what a pathetic excuse for a human being. look at him. he'd rather fight than to listen a few questions. what a fucking douche.
If John Stuart or his staff were even remotely badass they would have actually beat these dumbass hippie conspiracy theorists' asses. If you're going to be arrested for battery you might as well get your money's worth.
@helm8969 Question: are all of the members of Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, and Military Officers for 9/11 Truth considered "hippies" in your mind? Or maybe the story that some barefoot peasants from a cave in the desert carried out the largest attack on the most powerful nation in history is just too logically infallible to deny.
Comedy Central will never tolerate a Bill Hicks type populist who would call out the left/right puppets for who they are. John Stewart says some bold things here and there, but he is ever the party loyalist. If he wants to keep his job and his weekend home and his wine cellar and his swank vacations, he'll continue to color within the lines, and surround himself with belligerent jack asses like this current stable of writers.
The government wasn't involved. How do we know? Because govt isn't competent enough to create a large scale conspiracy with no leaks.
Look at Watergate. That was a small scale break-in... how the hell are they going to cover up a large scale building destroying conspiracy if they can't cover up a small scale break-in? Can't be done.
This is the answer to all conspiracy theories. The govt is incompetent. That's the REAL TRUTH.
@Maytag99 I'm soooo sick of this pathetic uninformed cliche about "the government didn't do this, they're incompetent". It shows a complete ignorance of the facts of 911. The truth of the matter is that government incompetence is the very reason that a small group of insiders can infiltrate key positions to pull off such a crime. Have you not parsed the absurdity of the official story? Must you declare your ignorance with such bravado?
@nealkassanoff You're the ignorant one. The "official story" has been proven, over and over. Any inconsistancies you think you see are caused by misinformation and ignorance.
"A small group of insiders can infiltrate key positions"? And I'm sure they can blow up a building without anyone noticing. That's laughable. You've watched too many movies; in reality, people can't cover things like that up.
Again... WATERGATE!! They couldn't cover up a simple breakin! Use your head!!
@Maytag99 Really? You believe the that the official story is true? You're sooo enlightened!!! More enlightened than six of the ten 911 commissioners who said that their own investigation was a white wash and a cover up. Close your eyes or wish upon a star, and jet fuel still will not cause the load baring points of three steel framed buildings to collapse (much less collapse symmetrically, straight downwardly, rapidly and sequentially). It is not possible.
Steel loses it's strength when it reaches a certain temperature, which was easily reached because of the burning jet fuel. Once the structure of the building is weakened, it can no longer hold it's own weight, so it collapsed.
Conspiracy theories are seductive because they are exciting. But they don't hold up to scrutiny. You're the one closing your eyes and wishing on a star. Please wake up.
@Maytag99 Actually, I'm not wrong. And if you believe that jet fuel would create such collapses, you have more regard for your childish denial than you do for considering fundamentals of science that you should have learned in the eighth grade. Secondly, there is absolutely nothing "seductive" about coming to terms with the fact that the very people who have stripped you of your rights and started wars in the name protecting you are the ones who murdered your fellow citizens in the first place.
@nealkassanoff Again, it's not JET FUEL making the building collapse. The jet fuel burns at high temperatures. Those temperatures weaken the steel. The weakened steel can't hold the weight of the building; thus it collapses. What part about that do you not understand?
@Maytag99 Gosh, I hate this ridiculous argument. And yet, I must challenge your absolute idiocy. Steel melts at temperatures of 2750 F and above. Steel will never become hotter than the temperature of the heat applied to it. The red orange flames of 911 indicate a temperature of about 1200, and those flames were short lived. A household heater made of steel can run on jet grade kerosene with temperatures of up to 1800 and nothing is damaged. Wait there's more....
@nealkassanoff Re: wait there's more: Numerous other towers have caught fire for longer and burned hotter. None of them collapsed. NIST classified accounts of explosions in the building. Willie Rodriguez gave sworn testimony of explosions in the buildings and it was classified. Molten metal not "weakened steel" was evident by video accounts and witnesses. The anatomy of the building was complex. Three separate structures that were inherently free standing, all collapsed in tandem. Odd.
@nealkassanoff By saying "three separate structures" I am not referring to each of the towers. I am referring to the core, the floors and the outer steel "netting" that made up the load baring elements of towers one and two. Each figure had its on free standing anatomy. And yet, such an even collapse, such a rapid and orderly sequence. Very unusual phenomenon for a coincidence theorist like yourself.
@nealkassanoff Now, given that you yourself admit that the fires in the towers were well above 1000 degrees, and that this is easily enough to weaken the steel by 50% or more, please explain to me again why the towers wouldn't collapse.
@Maytag99 Well a lot of responses come to mind regarding what you have to say. The big one that really leaps out at me is that we have many, many examples of metal framed buildings that burned hotter for longer. And yet, not one of them collapsed, much less with so many similarities to the collapse of a controlled demolition. So, either you have your facts wrong or every other example of a burning skyscraper is also a defiance of thermal laws.
@nealkassanoff Thanks, that's a lot more reasonable reply than your last.
I assure you my facts are correct. Steel weakens dramatically at higher temperatures. If you don't believe me, do a little research yourself. Type into google "steel weakens at hotter temperatures."
The reason why some buildings might collapse and some might not under similar circumstances is because there are many different factors which enter into the equation.
@Maytag99 Apparently, the "other factors" only applied to three skyscrapers in the history of burning skyscrapers. Hotter flames, longer burns... no collapse. Not ever.
@Maytag99 Apparently the "other factors" caused short lived fires to distribute 650 degrees of heat (minimum) to every load baring point of the entire frame of wtc 1, 2 and 7. Seems that heat like that would have cooked every person in the building. Its especially unusual since steel dissipates heat as the energy is conducted over a greater mass. It also seems weird that the core, the floors and the mesh exterior would all weaken with such evenness. All from short lived fires burning out.
@nealkassanoff I can answer all those points but it would be futile... I don't want to get sidetracked. Your initial point was "jet fuel can't cause a building to collapse."
Let me ask you, again, point blank: high temperatures causes steel to be weakened dramatically. Do you agree? Yes or no.
@Maytag99 As I pointed out, a household heater with jet grade kerosene burns at 1800 degrees and does no damage to metal components. I also made an argument based on your premise that this rule seems to apply only to three buildings on that single day (that whole "other factors" thing). So, if you have something convincing to offer then offer it. Taking into account both what I don't know and what I do know, I've still yet to find your argument compelling.
@nealkassanoff A household heater burns at 1800 degrees? What type of heater? Would you mind offering me some direction as to where I may read about this information? Because that seems hard to believe.
@Maytag99 .Fair enough, upon closer look at the source for this item, it says that jet grade kerosene fuel used in such heaters can burn at a maximum of 1800 degrees. It does not say that it does burn in heaters at that temperature. I still return to the same request for a more compelling explanation regarding how a quickly dissipating fire did what no other skyscraper fire has ever done (while also baring so much resemblance to a controlled demolition).
@nealkassanoff Alright. The reason fires don't usually cause buildings to collapse is because steel beams are normally insulated to fireproof them, precisely because steel loses it's strength in extreme heat. In the case of the WTC, the impact of the plane probably knocked off some of the insulating material. Thus, the steel beams expanded and warped, and the trusses could no longer hold the weight and it collapsed.
@Maytag99 Yeah, I've heard that clap trap before. And, if that's the best you have to offer its not close to a compelling argument. Even if you can prove that a plane would shake off all of the insulation of the steel framing of wtc 1, 2 AND 7 (which doesn't sound at all sensible) an uncontrolled and dying burn of a fire in a limited area will not transfer sufficient heat to a sufficient number of load baring points to create the collapses we saw on 911.
@nealkassanoff Why would it need to shake off *all* of the insulation? It only needs to do so at one key point. Again, it's the WEIGHT of the building which causes the collapse, not the fire.
You're the one who need the compelling argument as to why weakening the steel beams of a skyscraper wouldn't cause it to collapse. Think it over; try again.
@Maytag99 Again, another premise that holds no validity. The collapse was not a domino-style collapse, there was no evidence of that. First, the speed of the collapse renders this explanation invalid. Also, despite the use of the phrase "pancake collapse" there was not a stack of the building's floors remaining on the ground. The load baring steel, plain and simple, would put up far more resistance to a collapse at a weak point, and the outer casing would have resisted at a differential.
@nealkassanoff Notice how you are trying to shift to other claims now. "The speed is wrong, there was no stack of the building's floors." Those claims have different answers... stay focused. Right now we are talking about whether a fire can cause a building to collapse.
Let's start at the beginning. The plane crashes into the building. It does some damage, and starts some fires. We agree that is logical, right?
@Maytag99 To your point, the fires were clearly diminishing as per the smoke evidence. The flames in question simply would not transfer that level of heat. A twelve hundred degree max flame does not automatically transfer heat into nearby metal up to a "weakening" temp. The flame must be sustained and directed in a specific way. The supposed heat of such an occurrence is contradicted by living people waving from the location of the damage.
@nealkassanoff So you're saying that the fires in WTC were "diminishing." Let's talk, in detail, about how you're wrong.
The WTC had two kinds of "fireproofing." A sprinkler system, and SFRM (spray-on fire resistant material.) These systems are generally designed to contain a normal office fire until the fire department gets there.
On 9/11, thousands of gallons of jet fuel was introduced and immedietely ignited across several floors.
@Maytag99 I appreciate your commitment to your position, but frankly I see no value in continuing this discussion. I have offered concrete points of evidence for my position, and its certainly your prerogative to dismiss them. I will not, however, make it my prerogative to offer more evidence that you will also summarily dismiss.
@nealkassanoff The only thing I'm commited to is the truth.
Sorry, but if you offered any evidence as to why a massive building fire would "diminish," I must have missed it. You have tried to shift the argument to other areas like falling speed and you have made spurious claims like the 1800 degree heater.
Your arguments defy common sense. Massive fires don't just "diminish" on their own.
@Maytag99 Frankly, its your prerogative to believe such nonsense about the removal of insulation and nature of the fire in question. I don't agree with you on this point and I have stated my case. I have also stated my case on the events that followed. Believe what you want. It is time for me to leave you to your denial.
@nealkassanoff Impact from the plane destroyed the sprinkler system, and dislodged a certain amount of SFRM from the structure. Now, you are correct that the jet fuel would not burn forever... but it was so critically severe that multiple large fires had been caused. The sprinklers were useless. This is a situation that no fire protection system prior to 9/11 could ever cope with.
Back to step 2. The fires were not fought, therefore more damage accumulates. NOW do you agree?
@nealkassanoff As you say yourself, the temperature of the fires were somewhere around 1200 degrees. Steel will weaken by 50% in temperatures of 650 degrees. This is enough to explain why the towers would collapse from the fire. There are additional factors which contributed to the collapse and might explain how a similar fire in another building might not cause a collapse, if you like I can go into detail about them.
how he gets bored the second someone mentioned jersey girls. then he'd like to fight (again). why? well, iirc the jersey girls were on the cover of time magazine or person of the year or sth like that. watch his angry face as he calls for them to fight each other again. what a loser.
(rolls eyes) It's clear these idiots just want publicity and fame, there's no real answer or cause they're supporting. They're harassing no name writers of a comedy news show about a ten year old conspiracy. Hardly topical or relevant...
Plus that last "explanation" reeked of hyperbole and pandering for sympathy...very convenient there was "no videotape" to support his story...
The only accurate part of this was the warning: "The video and audio quality of this clip are very poor..."
@Nerrt45 How can you declare that 911 is no longer important. It is the premise, the mythology, the emotional button, the propaganda hinge that justifies and propels endless and senseless wars, the stripping of our rights via the Patriot Act and the establishment of "Homeland Security" which is an American version of the KGB. How long are you going to tolerate this kind of treatment? How long are you going to stare a lie in the face and call it the truth?
Very sad...I've given up on people long ago. It's good to fight the good fight but look at the jeers the man got just when asking that...and then all of those people fucking laughed at him...what the fuck is funny about 9/11? same with glenn beck he is a total garbage bag making fun of the families who havent had any questions answered he told them to move on and stop crying? I mean really? no one does anything about this either...he still has a job
I had no idea jon stewart had a show or that he wrote books. I thought the daily show was a skit thing between programming.
Why do people listen to clowns like glenn back and jon stewart anyways. They just polarize themselves and divide people into a left tribe and a right tribe.
Stop being primitive and falling into this tribal shit and look at the facts objectively.
You can see that the staff who are confrontational are Jewish. Jon Stewart is also Jewish. The hostility coming from the Zionists is because of Israel's involvement in 911. The gig is up and Israel's demise is imminent.
What is brave to piss other people off? And do you get the irony here? The writer got arrested. If that conspiracy bullshit were true, shouldn't it be the other way?
@TengoInfo As I said, they are brave men. I do not have to explain myself, least of all to you. If you really care about my opinion, make some effort to understand why I and others are so passionate about this issue instead of going along with your base assumption.
The Jon Stewart show sucks dick anyways. Press charges on that stupid man!!! He prolly writes all the dumb shit on the show anyways and should be arrested for making people dumber while they watch the show
I hate people in Television. Their arrogance is going to be the downfall of America. They think they know everything with out doing a lick of research. I'm so glad they're willfully idiots, and it's not like they are being forced... Then I'd almost feel bad for them. No bad feelings, only the desire to shove a book dow...n their throat. ;) F*%k THE PAID LIARS OF AMERICA!@#$%^
Yeah they are all paid shills. David Letterman is another Obama cock smoker who stages interviews to make the guy look like a saint. Why do we care what the TV tells the drone like idiots anyway?
Whats with all these people calling we are change bullies? None of stewarts people needed to say two words to them. Albanese chose to argue with them and then went crazy and attacked someone. There's no spinning it. If the assault actually took place as described then there's no arguing on Albanese's behalf.
John Stewart (Not his real name.. and like most Hollyweird Jews, they always change it) Is a globalist tool, a progressive change agent.
John could NEVER start his own show, and be successful.
No matter how much promotion and money spent on JS, his debut MTV show BLEWas he does!
JS needed to ride the coat tails of Craig Kilborn who had made the Daily Show a success. John, go back to sucking your uncle Lemmy off. With out him, you would have NO job.
the jon stewart cult is hard to penetrate, bunch of smarmy liberal yppies, nice try, exposed them for their hypocrisy, i hope this goes viral, but the effin libtards will surely twist this onto their side somehow with their trendy narcissitic humour. Jon Stewart and his mossad team licks balls.
that write for the daily show is a little faggot "turn the cameras off and lets fight" look bitch, turn the cameras off and see the 9/11 truth movement swarm ur ass with intellect. even though they could beat his small little ass to a pulp without trying, we'll use finesse. fuck the daily show. and FUCK that puunk ass writer that gets NO pussy which is why he so angry...
@1800CRYMORE We are change had the right to fight that guy who said he wanted to put the cameras and fight. All of that anger and rage that is directed towards the good people of We are Chanage are going to come back to those persecutors of Freedom many times over. I pray that they repent and get out from the grip of there Pimp, Lucifer.
And the main stream media doesn't report this. Yep go ahead trample over our inalienable human rights. Where's Jesse Jackson, Rev. Sharpton, any 1st amendment protector?
Mr. Lebowitz A.K.A Stwart crew are hypocrites, Mr. Albanese is a thug. Hey Mr Albanese don't drop the soap at the jail! How can you restore sanity BY BEATING PEACEFUL ASSEMBLERS ON THE STREETS! BOYCOTT John LEBOWITZ A.K.A Stwart's show.
Nice sheep mentality from the crowd. Yes, let's all laugh becuase we're cowards living in denial unable to face the reality of how bad the lies/corruption//foreign policy/military industrial police state situation is. Detriment to the race they are.
Jon Stewart is nothing but an establishment shill. He will never focus on important issues like evidence of the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.
you know,yeah jon stewart is a funny funny, propaganda artist. That doesn't mean this so called truth movement needs to get in someones face. he is just a writer and maybe he didnt want a camera in his face. Quit acting like bullies or the truth movement will die. No one listens to A@#h0les.
Fuck Jon Stewart! He could get as much yucks as he likes but other then the Starbucks drinkings yuppies, America really isn't listening to him or Colbert for that matter.
Jon stewarts brother is Larry Leibowitz, chief operating officer of the New York Stock Exchange. Do you really think he's going to get on board with 911 truth? He's a zionist shill.
these guys made a video of a confrontation, and they are painting the subject of the video as the bad guy.
To simplify things like this and jump to the conclusion that anyone who either doesn't agree or doesn't appreciate the methods employed is part of the conspiracy is irresponsible and makes the whole truth movement look bad.
Most people involved in the machine don't even know they are involved.
Leftover Designs, I appreciate your comment. Let's get the people that actually did this.
Confronting comedy writers? These guys are looking for their next comedy bit. It's a comedy show.
Congressmen? Yes. CEO's and Bankers? Yes. Entertainers like Stewart? Why? His cadre is plenty smart enough to realize that WAC is trying to use his platform as a springboard into greater publicity for their views. You expect no retribution? Comedy writers, dude. Comedy writers...
Guys, I really think many of the theories regarding 9/11 being an inside job have merit. It is one of the great crimes against the American people that there was a sham of an investigation that produced nothing close to the truth, a new fangled Warren Commission, indeed.
That said, you guys (We Are Change) are going about this the wrong way, confronting the wrong people. You will not further your agenda with your tactics. You deserve what you got. Get a brain, and do it right.
YOu are not using the correct words for the writers, or security, they are not JEWS ZIONISTS ARE NAZI'S yeah how long did it take for the White Racists in the US Power Structure to take over, about 144 yrs. The ZIONISTS took over Israel a long time ago. This is far bigger than you people can even remotely imagine. Cheers
@Mastirshake -- i like jon less now but he and steve are no question good comedians - but we hv to assume they are ignorant bec of the media's blackout of info - these ppl are busy in their work and they dont spend there time online when they have time - -we need to assume the best, not be disrespectful and look rational -- remember Richard Gage didnt realize it was demolition until *yrs* after the events and he's an expert!
I use to like jon stewart, but as of late his true colours have come through. I know hes not as dumb to believe the lie of 911, therefore he must be working directly for the same people that attcked us that day. And TBO if jons in bed with them, i have to assume that steven is as well, witch in turn would make stevens christian talk worthless in the sight of God
i've met you guys (wac-nyc) and i wish i could be in on the action these days -- there really needs to be an assumption of ignorance until proven otherwise -- the neg comments here re jews will totally turn ppl off and it is dead wrong bec many jews hv been speaking truth even though in my gut with all that i've read/seen re 911 the mossad/ tight knit neo-cons are the prime suspects -- focus on the facts and opening an independent investigation - thats how to break thru to ppl
That what they are doing and if any familys care about their children not being brainwashed by scumbags in the media, who protect government terrorists, everyone should be boycotting The Daily Show and show these goofy moron's, that people are not fooled by lies and criminals protecting government terrorism.
guys i have rage re the 911 cover up too-having mid-east origins-but we wont win by aggressive confrontation and its better to giv stewart and his ppl hard evidence like the ae911truth newsppr- we can't expect them to listen and go research on their own and we have to assume they are as ignorant of the facts like many others-we MUST not do anything that will take away from looking rational - i'm mailing the AE ppr out to ppl and organiz'n heads--the questions asked to jon were not effectiv imho
Why did they stand there and take that shit from the guys at the daily show guys like 5 inches taller and they are totally punking him out don't say you touch me im gonna press charges he touches you knock him the fuck out.
You can still sue in civil court even if the criminal charges don't hold up. This guy is executive producer, sweet. If you've got witnesses it's open and shut. That punch is as good as gold. I'm amazed he got so angry , foolish, you win. It must have been that Jon Stewart lite comment.
Ugh, I'm not surprised at all to learn that the apes at the "The Daily Show" resort to silly grade school tactics of debate and discussion when pressed on these issues. We Are Change is correct to assert that these people are complete gatekeepers and seek to not inform their viewers, but skew their thoughts and opinions because they know that the viewers unconsciously or even consciously desire to be led around by a talking head
Matt, thank you. Your article on this incident is great.
Everyone needs to remember how to convey the facts surrounding the events of September 11 and what those facts are, especially in situations like this. You could have completely discredited these people and then possibly convinced them by using facts and logic.
What the hell... Be more informative and less annoying. If you talk to people in a civilized way maybe they might just listen. They will instanly think your nuts if you get really emotional about it.
That's the way the cultures are designed to handle messed up facts. They like to hear it in a calm way.
Be more professional.. now its going to be impossible to wake these important people up!! Thanks a lot. They are going to hear the topic and instantly regard it as pure lunacy.
@SunnyLovetts They know the truth in their hearts. The time to try and convince these tools is quickly coming to an end. Time to choose sides kids. The ghost of bill Hicks shall haunt them forever for selling their comedic souls.
@SunnyLovetts To the contrary, some folks look upon anyone on tv as a God or as having some position of authority because they have a show on tv. These guys are used to people talking normal and fawning over them everywhere they go. I say you need to speak to them in a tone that is not violent, but yet speak as if you have authority, or a an expert in your subject to snap them outta the trance and atleast listen a little. Otherwise you just sound like some namby pamby whiner.
Wow.. you guys were really aggressive that guy too. Why go after this guy and the daily show when there are bigger people to go after. If he doesn't believe 9/11 then why try to convince him? He wasn't in the plot so why keep going after him? The dude sits at a desk answering emails all day about production and staff. Seriously man, go after someone else. You do not look professional and come off as slightly crazy.
The writer that hit you is so fired from the Daily Show! Sue him for 3 million dollars, should be an easy win. All those writers usually act like their gods but their nobody's when they do their contracts for a show.
Jon Stewart is just another puppet on a string, mouthing the same old tired government terrorist line, and if Jon Stewart had any morals what so ever he would be ashamed of his staff and offering his apology to we are change and pay for any damage that was done.
I lost all respect for Jon Stewart when he mocked people for doubting the government's recent Bin Laden fable. These despicable writers obviously have no interest in the truth.
scovell7 5 months ago
Stewart’s older brother, Larry Leibowitz, is the chief operating officer at the New York Stock Exchange
moontooth 5 months ago 2
rory albanese douche extraordinaire and scum galore. what a pathetic excuse for a human being. look at him. he'd rather fight than to listen a few questions. what a fucking douche.
911reset 6 months ago
Fuck 9/11 truth
Bruno2k5 1 year ago
@Bruno2k5
chill, shill, and stop sucking dicks.
911reset 6 months ago
Comment removed
Bruno2k5 1 year ago
Comment removed
LiquidMetalBand 1 year ago
If John Stuart or his staff were even remotely badass they would have actually beat these dumbass hippie conspiracy theorists' asses. If you're going to be arrested for battery you might as well get your money's worth.
helm8969 1 year ago
@helm8969 Question: are all of the members of Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, and Military Officers for 9/11 Truth considered "hippies" in your mind? Or maybe the story that some barefoot peasants from a cave in the desert carried out the largest attack on the most powerful nation in history is just too logically infallible to deny.
AmericanPatriot612 1 year ago
Perhaps someone could let us know the names of these writers?
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
Comedy Central will never tolerate a Bill Hicks type populist who would call out the left/right puppets for who they are. John Stewart says some bold things here and there, but he is ever the party loyalist. If he wants to keep his job and his weekend home and his wine cellar and his swank vacations, he'll continue to color within the lines, and surround himself with belligerent jack asses like this current stable of writers.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago 6
9/11 Truth is that it was done by Al Qaeda.
The government wasn't involved. How do we know? Because govt isn't competent enough to create a large scale conspiracy with no leaks.
Look at Watergate. That was a small scale break-in... how the hell are they going to cover up a large scale building destroying conspiracy if they can't cover up a small scale break-in? Can't be done.
This is the answer to all conspiracy theories. The govt is incompetent. That's the REAL TRUTH.
Maytag99 1 year ago
@Maytag99 I'm soooo sick of this pathetic uninformed cliche about "the government didn't do this, they're incompetent". It shows a complete ignorance of the facts of 911. The truth of the matter is that government incompetence is the very reason that a small group of insiders can infiltrate key positions to pull off such a crime. Have you not parsed the absurdity of the official story? Must you declare your ignorance with such bravado?
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff You're the ignorant one. The "official story" has been proven, over and over. Any inconsistancies you think you see are caused by misinformation and ignorance.
"A small group of insiders can infiltrate key positions"? And I'm sure they can blow up a building without anyone noticing. That's laughable. You've watched too many movies; in reality, people can't cover things like that up.
Again... WATERGATE!! They couldn't cover up a simple breakin! Use your head!!
Maytag99 1 year ago
@Maytag99 LOL
sRod21 1 year ago
@Maytag99 Really? You believe the that the official story is true? You're sooo enlightened!!! More enlightened than six of the ten 911 commissioners who said that their own investigation was a white wash and a cover up. Close your eyes or wish upon a star, and jet fuel still will not cause the load baring points of three steel framed buildings to collapse (much less collapse symmetrically, straight downwardly, rapidly and sequentially). It is not possible.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff You are wrong.
Steel loses it's strength when it reaches a certain temperature, which was easily reached because of the burning jet fuel. Once the structure of the building is weakened, it can no longer hold it's own weight, so it collapsed.
Conspiracy theories are seductive because they are exciting. But they don't hold up to scrutiny. You're the one closing your eyes and wishing on a star. Please wake up.
Maytag99 1 year ago
@Maytag99 Actually, I'm not wrong. And if you believe that jet fuel would create such collapses, you have more regard for your childish denial than you do for considering fundamentals of science that you should have learned in the eighth grade. Secondly, there is absolutely nothing "seductive" about coming to terms with the fact that the very people who have stripped you of your rights and started wars in the name protecting you are the ones who murdered your fellow citizens in the first place.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff Again, it's not JET FUEL making the building collapse. The jet fuel burns at high temperatures. Those temperatures weaken the steel. The weakened steel can't hold the weight of the building; thus it collapses. What part about that do you not understand?
Maytag99 1 year ago
@Maytag99 Gosh, I hate this ridiculous argument. And yet, I must challenge your absolute idiocy. Steel melts at temperatures of 2750 F and above. Steel will never become hotter than the temperature of the heat applied to it. The red orange flames of 911 indicate a temperature of about 1200, and those flames were short lived. A household heater made of steel can run on jet grade kerosene with temperatures of up to 1800 and nothing is damaged. Wait there's more....
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff Re: wait there's more: Numerous other towers have caught fire for longer and burned hotter. None of them collapsed. NIST classified accounts of explosions in the building. Willie Rodriguez gave sworn testimony of explosions in the buildings and it was classified. Molten metal not "weakened steel" was evident by video accounts and witnesses. The anatomy of the building was complex. Three separate structures that were inherently free standing, all collapsed in tandem. Odd.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff By saying "three separate structures" I am not referring to each of the towers. I am referring to the core, the floors and the outer steel "netting" that made up the load baring elements of towers one and two. Each figure had its on free standing anatomy. And yet, such an even collapse, such a rapid and orderly sequence. Very unusual phenomenon for a coincidence theorist like yourself.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff Now, given that you yourself admit that the fires in the towers were well above 1000 degrees, and that this is easily enough to weaken the steel by 50% or more, please explain to me again why the towers wouldn't collapse.
And this time please make sense.
Maytag99 1 year ago
@Maytag99 Well a lot of responses come to mind regarding what you have to say. The big one that really leaps out at me is that we have many, many examples of metal framed buildings that burned hotter for longer. And yet, not one of them collapsed, much less with so many similarities to the collapse of a controlled demolition. So, either you have your facts wrong or every other example of a burning skyscraper is also a defiance of thermal laws.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff Thanks, that's a lot more reasonable reply than your last.
I assure you my facts are correct. Steel weakens dramatically at higher temperatures. If you don't believe me, do a little research yourself. Type into google "steel weakens at hotter temperatures."
The reason why some buildings might collapse and some might not under similar circumstances is because there are many different factors which enter into the equation.
Maytag99 1 year ago
@Maytag99 Apparently, the "other factors" only applied to three skyscrapers in the history of burning skyscrapers. Hotter flames, longer burns... no collapse. Not ever.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@Maytag99 Apparently the "other factors" caused short lived fires to distribute 650 degrees of heat (minimum) to every load baring point of the entire frame of wtc 1, 2 and 7. Seems that heat like that would have cooked every person in the building. Its especially unusual since steel dissipates heat as the energy is conducted over a greater mass. It also seems weird that the core, the floors and the mesh exterior would all weaken with such evenness. All from short lived fires burning out.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff I can answer all those points but it would be futile... I don't want to get sidetracked. Your initial point was "jet fuel can't cause a building to collapse."
Let me ask you, again, point blank: high temperatures causes steel to be weakened dramatically. Do you agree? Yes or no.
Maytag99 1 year ago
@Maytag99 As I pointed out, a household heater with jet grade kerosene burns at 1800 degrees and does no damage to metal components. I also made an argument based on your premise that this rule seems to apply only to three buildings on that single day (that whole "other factors" thing). So, if you have something convincing to offer then offer it. Taking into account both what I don't know and what I do know, I've still yet to find your argument compelling.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff A household heater burns at 1800 degrees? What type of heater? Would you mind offering me some direction as to where I may read about this information? Because that seems hard to believe.
Maytag99 1 year ago
@Maytag99 .Fair enough, upon closer look at the source for this item, it says that jet grade kerosene fuel used in such heaters can burn at a maximum of 1800 degrees. It does not say that it does burn in heaters at that temperature. I still return to the same request for a more compelling explanation regarding how a quickly dissipating fire did what no other skyscraper fire has ever done (while also baring so much resemblance to a controlled demolition).
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff Alright. The reason fires don't usually cause buildings to collapse is because steel beams are normally insulated to fireproof them, precisely because steel loses it's strength in extreme heat. In the case of the WTC, the impact of the plane probably knocked off some of the insulating material. Thus, the steel beams expanded and warped, and the trusses could no longer hold the weight and it collapsed.
Maytag99 1 year ago
@Maytag99 Yeah, I've heard that clap trap before. And, if that's the best you have to offer its not close to a compelling argument. Even if you can prove that a plane would shake off all of the insulation of the steel framing of wtc 1, 2 AND 7 (which doesn't sound at all sensible) an uncontrolled and dying burn of a fire in a limited area will not transfer sufficient heat to a sufficient number of load baring points to create the collapses we saw on 911.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff Why would it need to shake off *all* of the insulation? It only needs to do so at one key point. Again, it's the WEIGHT of the building which causes the collapse, not the fire.
You're the one who need the compelling argument as to why weakening the steel beams of a skyscraper wouldn't cause it to collapse. Think it over; try again.
Maytag99 1 year ago
@Maytag99 Again, another premise that holds no validity. The collapse was not a domino-style collapse, there was no evidence of that. First, the speed of the collapse renders this explanation invalid. Also, despite the use of the phrase "pancake collapse" there was not a stack of the building's floors remaining on the ground. The load baring steel, plain and simple, would put up far more resistance to a collapse at a weak point, and the outer casing would have resisted at a differential.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff Notice how you are trying to shift to other claims now. "The speed is wrong, there was no stack of the building's floors." Those claims have different answers... stay focused. Right now we are talking about whether a fire can cause a building to collapse.
Let's start at the beginning. The plane crashes into the building. It does some damage, and starts some fires. We agree that is logical, right?
Maytag99 1 year ago
@Maytag99 To your point, the fires were clearly diminishing as per the smoke evidence. The flames in question simply would not transfer that level of heat. A twelve hundred degree max flame does not automatically transfer heat into nearby metal up to a "weakening" temp. The flame must be sustained and directed in a specific way. The supposed heat of such an occurrence is contradicted by living people waving from the location of the damage.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff So you're saying that the fires in WTC were "diminishing." Let's talk, in detail, about how you're wrong.
The WTC had two kinds of "fireproofing." A sprinkler system, and SFRM (spray-on fire resistant material.) These systems are generally designed to contain a normal office fire until the fire department gets there.
On 9/11, thousands of gallons of jet fuel was introduced and immedietely ignited across several floors.
Maytag99 1 year ago
@Maytag99 I appreciate your commitment to your position, but frankly I see no value in continuing this discussion. I have offered concrete points of evidence for my position, and its certainly your prerogative to dismiss them. I will not, however, make it my prerogative to offer more evidence that you will also summarily dismiss.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff The only thing I'm commited to is the truth.
Sorry, but if you offered any evidence as to why a massive building fire would "diminish," I must have missed it. You have tried to shift the argument to other areas like falling speed and you have made spurious claims like the 1800 degree heater.
Your arguments defy common sense. Massive fires don't just "diminish" on their own.
Maytag99 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Maytag99 Thanks and have a good day.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@Maytag99 Thanks, really. Its been fun. Have a great day.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@Maytag99 Also, thanks for correcting the spurious claim. That point was well taken.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff That's polite of you, thanks. Sorry I had to disagree with you.
Maytag99 1 year ago
@Maytag99 Frankly, its your prerogative to believe such nonsense about the removal of insulation and nature of the fire in question. I don't agree with you on this point and I have stated my case. I have also stated my case on the events that followed. Believe what you want. It is time for me to leave you to your denial.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff Impact from the plane destroyed the sprinkler system, and dislodged a certain amount of SFRM from the structure. Now, you are correct that the jet fuel would not burn forever... but it was so critically severe that multiple large fires had been caused. The sprinklers were useless. This is a situation that no fire protection system prior to 9/11 could ever cope with.
Back to step 2. The fires were not fought, therefore more damage accumulates. NOW do you agree?
Maytag99 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff Step 2. The fires were not fought. Therefore, more damage acculumates. Does this make sense to you?
Maytag99 1 year ago
@nealkassanoff As you say yourself, the temperature of the fires were somewhere around 1200 degrees. Steel will weaken by 50% in temperatures of 650 degrees. This is enough to explain why the towers would collapse from the fire. There are additional factors which contributed to the collapse and might explain how a similar fire in another building might not cause a collapse, if you like I can go into detail about them.
Maytag99 1 year ago
how he gets bored the second someone mentioned jersey girls. then he'd like to fight (again). why? well, iirc the jersey girls were on the cover of time magazine or person of the year or sth like that. watch his angry face as he calls for them to fight each other again. what a loser.
911reset 1 year ago
How did that guy not end up with the camera up his ass? That's the big mystery here.
vonhinter 1 year ago
cognitive dissonance ignites into violence in this video, amazing to watch, and very revealing
smotviddy 1 year ago
(rolls eyes) It's clear these idiots just want publicity and fame, there's no real answer or cause they're supporting. They're harassing no name writers of a comedy news show about a ten year old conspiracy. Hardly topical or relevant...
Plus that last "explanation" reeked of hyperbole and pandering for sympathy...very convenient there was "no videotape" to support his story...
The only accurate part of this was the warning: "The video and audio quality of this clip are very poor..."
Nerrt45 1 year ago
@Nerrt45 How can you declare that 911 is no longer important. It is the premise, the mythology, the emotional button, the propaganda hinge that justifies and propels endless and senseless wars, the stripping of our rights via the Patriot Act and the establishment of "Homeland Security" which is an American version of the KGB. How long are you going to tolerate this kind of treatment? How long are you going to stare a lie in the face and call it the truth?
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
Comment removed
Nerrt45 1 year ago
Jon Stewart is afraid of being made a fool after all the tear filled support he gave to the government line of events
dobberdoss 1 year ago
Listen to the boos, form the very people who NEVER question a thing they are told!
Just goes to show you can't educate people to think for themselves, they are either born sheep or not
dobberdoss 1 year ago
you're all fags attacking jon. the truth movement is bullshit anyways.
Clockninja 1 year ago
Hey John Stewart, 9 years of Bush jokes arent funny or original, your show sucks dick.
doubleas2380 1 year ago
@doubleas2380
First, do you really think that Stewart is gonna read this youtube comment?
Secondly, you should learn how to write his name, its Jon not John.
Thirdly, you are a moron if you believe that conspiracy bullshit.
TengoInfo 1 year ago
Jon Stewart is telling the truth with his sign at the beginning. It was an outside job by people who look just like him. The irony is hilarious.
TheArJist 1 year ago
It often feels that, given the opportunity, some people will take to showing just how abhorent they can be.
TheDive99 1 year ago
Daily show is the most honest news outlet on television.
DonFormica 1 year ago
@DonFormica LOL well that says a lot for the mainstream news. get the truth from Alex Jones instead
zephiloyd 1 year ago
Very sad...I've given up on people long ago. It's good to fight the good fight but look at the jeers the man got just when asking that...and then all of those people fucking laughed at him...what the fuck is funny about 9/11? same with glenn beck he is a total garbage bag making fun of the families who havent had any questions answered he told them to move on and stop crying? I mean really? no one does anything about this either...he still has a job
shenmueryu 1 year ago
I consider myself pretty gutsy but these guys are just...fearless.
AlanAyazyam 1 year ago
I had no idea jon stewart had a show or that he wrote books. I thought the daily show was a skit thing between programming.
Why do people listen to clowns like glenn back and jon stewart anyways. They just polarize themselves and divide people into a left tribe and a right tribe.
Stop being primitive and falling into this tribal shit and look at the facts objectively.
but you won't you are all tards
citan84 1 year ago
Oh how convinien that the camera was broken yeah right. What about the 4 other cams then? *dislikes*
PsykoOps 1 year ago
You can see that the staff who are confrontational are Jewish. Jon Stewart is also Jewish. The hostility coming from the Zionists is because of Israel's involvement in 911. The gig is up and Israel's demise is imminent.
billk123 1 year ago 4
@billk123 haha it's so true.
TheArJist 1 year ago
So glad that you followed through with arresting that ignorant trash bag
DoctorMetropolis 1 year ago 4
some people just wont wake up until its too late.
killerbam1234 1 year ago
LOL @ more than likely I'd lose...
6:54
"I'm glad I kept my composure and didn't bury my fist in his face, because uh, more than likely i'd lose"
getfitdoc 1 year ago
You guys are brave men. I applaud you for your investigative research and exposure.
sRod21 1 year ago 2
@sRod21
What is brave to piss other people off? And do you get the irony here? The writer got arrested. If that conspiracy bullshit were true, shouldn't it be the other way?
TengoInfo 1 year ago
@TengoInfo As I said, they are brave men. I do not have to explain myself, least of all to you. If you really care about my opinion, make some effort to understand why I and others are so passionate about this issue instead of going along with your base assumption.
sRod21 1 year ago
The Jon Stewart show sucks dick anyways. Press charges on that stupid man!!! He prolly writes all the dumb shit on the show anyways and should be arrested for making people dumber while they watch the show
Boocho420 1 year ago 37
I hate people in Television. Their arrogance is going to be the downfall of America. They think they know everything with out doing a lick of research. I'm so glad they're willfully idiots, and it's not like they are being forced... Then I'd almost feel bad for them. No bad feelings, only the desire to shove a book dow...n their throat. ;) F*%k THE PAID LIARS OF AMERICA!@#$%^
riotgurlTFP 1 year ago
Matt... incredible resolve. Your reaction to the screaming lunatic was priceless. Keep it up man
911Infowarrior 1 year ago
ahahah that was good self control when you didnt move and said "touch me"
sakkurae 1 year ago
he looks like italian/gypsy, not american
sakkurae 1 year ago
Yeah they are all paid shills. David Letterman is another Obama cock smoker who stages interviews to make the guy look like a saint. Why do we care what the TV tells the drone like idiots anyway?
Soupdragoon 1 year ago
Dude you better press charges!
AwarenessCosmic 1 year ago
The Daily Show Staff
will have to deal with the creative blowback
ryanshaunkelly 1 year ago 3
hope you enjoy jail bitch! John Stewart you suck!
ghostlip1 1 year ago
Now both sides look like animals, this is just sad.
vidaliasweet 1 year ago
Whats with all these people calling we are change bullies? None of stewarts people needed to say two words to them. Albanese chose to argue with them and then went crazy and attacked someone. There's no spinning it. If the assault actually took place as described then there's no arguing on Albanese's behalf.
jd603 1 year ago 2
John Stewart (Not his real name.. and like most Hollyweird Jews, they always change it) Is a globalist tool, a progressive change agent.
John could NEVER start his own show, and be successful.
No matter how much promotion and money spent on JS, his debut MTV show BLEWas he does!
JS needed to ride the coat tails of Craig Kilborn who had made the Daily Show a success. John, go back to sucking your uncle Lemmy off. With out him, you would have NO job.
pf
pokerfacecom 1 year ago 5
D-bag John Stewart and his all Khazar staff have always sucked the big nut.
I hope WAC sues the shit out of these cocksuckers.
These Talmudic stormtroopers will be put on trial
ala Nuremberg 2 soon enough when America wakes the F up
JSIAK
JohnStewartisaKike 1 year ago 4
the jon stewart cult is hard to penetrate, bunch of smarmy liberal yppies, nice try, exposed them for their hypocrisy, i hope this goes viral, but the effin libtards will surely twist this onto their side somehow with their trendy narcissitic humour. Jon Stewart and his mossad team licks balls.
matsutakneatche 1 year ago 2
That bald headed bastard that was cussing at We are Change deserved to get knocked the fuck out.
Infowarslove 1 year ago 2
I will never again watch the Daily Show and I hope you won't either.
PostToastie 1 year ago 3
WHAT FAMILIES? THE VIC-SIMS YOU MEAN?
What about all the videographers being TV artists RORY you stinky jew fuck....human trash.
Cranevideo 1 year ago 3
that write for the daily show is a little faggot "turn the cameras off and lets fight" look bitch, turn the cameras off and see the 9/11 truth movement swarm ur ass with intellect. even though they could beat his small little ass to a pulp without trying, we'll use finesse. fuck the daily show. and FUCK that puunk ass writer that gets NO pussy which is why he so angry...
1800CRYMORE 1 year ago 3
@1800CRYMORE We are change had the right to fight that guy who said he wanted to put the cameras and fight. All of that anger and rage that is directed towards the good people of We are Chanage are going to come back to those persecutors of Freedom many times over. I pray that they repent and get out from the grip of there Pimp, Lucifer.
Infowarslove 1 year ago 2
And the main stream media doesn't report this. Yep go ahead trample over our inalienable human rights. Where's Jesse Jackson, Rev. Sharpton, any 1st amendment protector?
Mr. Lebowitz A.K.A Stwart crew are hypocrites, Mr. Albanese is a thug. Hey Mr Albanese don't drop the soap at the jail! How can you restore sanity BY BEATING PEACEFUL ASSEMBLERS ON THE STREETS! BOYCOTT John LEBOWITZ A.K.A Stwart's show.
SPREAD THE TRUTH. G-D IS WITH US.
LIBERTY EQUALITY FRATERNITY
88fighter 1 year ago 2
Nice sheep mentality from the crowd. Yes, let's all laugh becuase we're cowards living in denial unable to face the reality of how bad the lies/corruption//foreign policy/military industrial police state situation is. Detriment to the race they are.
Morgul1975 1 year ago 2
news from js??
mrgalaxyman57 1 year ago
The left gets its "news" from Comedy Central... what more is there to say?
N37BU6 1 year ago 14
Comment removed
slopartdotcom 1 year ago
Stewart is an establishment stooge. Why is anybody surprised that his goons would react this way?
robbierevenant 1 year ago 2
Jon Stewart is nothing but an establishment shill. He will never focus on important issues like evidence of the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.
riderpridester 1 year ago 2
Be more like the YES MEN. They know how to expose corruption without bullying.
spokaneman1983 1 year ago
you know,yeah jon stewart is a funny funny, propaganda artist. That doesn't mean this so called truth movement needs to get in someones face. he is just a writer and maybe he didnt want a camera in his face. Quit acting like bullies or the truth movement will die. No one listens to A@#h0les.
spokaneman1983 1 year ago
FYI - He should have sent that writer through the street.
vjacq88 1 year ago
Fuck Jon Stewart! He could get as much yucks as he likes but other then the Starbucks drinkings yuppies, America really isn't listening to him or Colbert for that matter.
Stewart isn't helping. Fuck! Celebs.
vjacq88 1 year ago 2
Jon stewarts brother is Larry Leibowitz, chief operating officer of the New York Stock Exchange. Do you really think he's going to get on board with 911 truth? He's a zionist shill.
shagbot69 1 year ago 8
i'm confused, there were multiple cameras questioning the comedy writer, but when he hit the Change guy there was no footage?
diegonj79 1 year ago
these guys made a video of a confrontation, and they are painting the subject of the video as the bad guy.
To simplify things like this and jump to the conclusion that anyone who either doesn't agree or doesn't appreciate the methods employed is part of the conspiracy is irresponsible and makes the whole truth movement look bad.
Most people involved in the machine don't even know they are involved.
Leftover Designs, I appreciate your comment. Let's get the people that actually did this.
tonyrutabega 1 year ago
Tonyrutabega,
Instead of criticizing others confrontations start your own group and confront who you feel is more important. It's everyones job to find the truth.
LeftoverDesigns 1 year ago 2
Attacking people who vocally disagree with you is dumb. Makes you a fascist, just like the bad people you are fighting against.
Build consensus. Lead people to the truth. I'm not exactly sure how to do it, but I am sure that this is not the way.
tonyrutabega 1 year ago
Confronting comedy writers? These guys are looking for their next comedy bit. It's a comedy show.
Congressmen? Yes. CEO's and Bankers? Yes. Entertainers like Stewart? Why? His cadre is plenty smart enough to realize that WAC is trying to use his platform as a springboard into greater publicity for their views. You expect no retribution? Comedy writers, dude. Comedy writers...
tonyrutabega 1 year ago
Guys, I really think many of the theories regarding 9/11 being an inside job have merit. It is one of the great crimes against the American people that there was a sham of an investigation that produced nothing close to the truth, a new fangled Warren Commission, indeed.
That said, you guys (We Are Change) are going about this the wrong way, confronting the wrong people. You will not further your agenda with your tactics. You deserve what you got. Get a brain, and do it right.
tonyrutabega 1 year ago
@tonyrutabega what are you proposing? holding protests that get zero media attention??
jez0990 1 year ago 3
YOu are not using the correct words for the writers, or security, they are not JEWS ZIONISTS ARE NAZI'S yeah how long did it take for the White Racists in the US Power Structure to take over, about 144 yrs. The ZIONISTS took over Israel a long time ago. This is far bigger than you people can even remotely imagine. Cheers
clarisd 1 year ago
Good grief, so much for Jon Stewart!
KimberleeMelissa 1 year ago 2
@Mastirshake -- i like jon less now but he and steve are no question good comedians - but we hv to assume they are ignorant bec of the media's blackout of info - these ppl are busy in their work and they dont spend there time online when they have time - -we need to assume the best, not be disrespectful and look rational -- remember Richard Gage didnt realize it was demolition until *yrs* after the events and he's an expert!
yt4kmh 1 year ago
I use to like jon stewart, but as of late his true colours have come through. I know hes not as dumb to believe the lie of 911, therefore he must be working directly for the same people that attcked us that day. And TBO if jons in bed with them, i have to assume that steven is as well, witch in turn would make stevens christian talk worthless in the sight of God
Mastirshake 1 year ago 2
John Stewart is just programed. When the truth comes out he'll be the mug.
Udgerjay 1 year ago
i've met you guys (wac-nyc) and i wish i could be in on the action these days -- there really needs to be an assumption of ignorance until proven otherwise -- the neg comments here re jews will totally turn ppl off and it is dead wrong bec many jews hv been speaking truth even though in my gut with all that i've read/seen re 911 the mossad/ tight knit neo-cons are the prime suspects -- focus on the facts and opening an independent investigation - thats how to break thru to ppl
yt4kmh 1 year ago 2
I like Jon Stewart and his organization signifigantly less since before I watched this. I hope you guys sink these assholes!
sxfxhxcx 1 year ago 2
protecting the Mass Murder criminals
ryanshaunkelly 1 year ago 20
That what they are doing and if any familys care about their children not being brainwashed by scumbags in the media, who protect government terrorists, everyone should be boycotting The Daily Show and show these goofy moron's, that people are not fooled by lies and criminals protecting government terrorism.
markhansel1 1 year ago
@ryanshaunkelly Bald dude would have been laying in a pool of his own blood...I can't go to these things...
shenmueryu 1 year ago
guys i have rage re the 911 cover up too-having mid-east origins-but we wont win by aggressive confrontation and its better to giv stewart and his ppl hard evidence like the ae911truth newsppr- we can't expect them to listen and go research on their own and we have to assume they are as ignorant of the facts like many others-we MUST not do anything that will take away from looking rational - i'm mailing the AE ppr out to ppl and organiz'n heads--the questions asked to jon were not effectiv imho
yt4kmh 1 year ago
I don't know what's going on but that one tool had an iphone and then the other tool next to him also had an iphone.
welchsrapejuice 1 year ago
Can someone explain to me what's going on?
23prophet 1 year ago
Why did they stand there and take that shit from the guys at the daily show guys like 5 inches taller and they are totally punking him out don't say you touch me im gonna press charges he touches you knock him the fuck out.
mexicantlivehere 1 year ago
Jon Stewart is a douche paid off by Rothschild.
4Th3Truthful 1 year ago 5
Jews tend to hit and run. Its in there blood.
Why are you wearechange arguing with these Jews in the first place. F them all.
idrobinhood 1 year ago
You can still sue in civil court even if the criminal charges don't hold up. This guy is executive producer, sweet. If you've got witnesses it's open and shut. That punch is as good as gold. I'm amazed he got so angry , foolish, you win. It must have been that Jon Stewart lite comment.
jd603 1 year ago 3
Ugh, I'm not surprised at all to learn that the apes at the "The Daily Show" resort to silly grade school tactics of debate and discussion when pressed on these issues. We Are Change is correct to assert that these people are complete gatekeepers and seek to not inform their viewers, but skew their thoughts and opinions because they know that the viewers unconsciously or even consciously desire to be led around by a talking head
TheHungryHun 1 year ago 2
You know this country is fucked when you start getting Comedy central comedians involved with politics.
TheSerfAttack 1 year ago 2
Glad to read that Albanese was arrested. What an idiot!!
lowgens02 1 year ago 3
Great Job guys
people go to the video Bush explosives you will see my comment on top read it do what it says then thumbs it up.
MilitaryMind4409 1 year ago
Matt, thank you. Your article on this incident is great.
Everyone needs to remember how to convey the facts surrounding the events of September 11 and what those facts are, especially in situations like this. You could have completely discredited these people and then possibly convinced them by using facts and logic.
RandleEl11 1 year ago 2
What the hell... Be more informative and less annoying. If you talk to people in a civilized way maybe they might just listen. They will instanly think your nuts if you get really emotional about it.
That's the way the cultures are designed to handle messed up facts. They like to hear it in a calm way.
Be more professional.. now its going to be impossible to wake these important people up!! Thanks a lot. They are going to hear the topic and instantly regard it as pure lunacy.
JUST GREAT
SunnyLovetts 1 year ago
@SunnyLovetts They know the truth in their hearts. The time to try and convince these tools is quickly coming to an end. Time to choose sides kids. The ghost of bill Hicks shall haunt them forever for selling their comedic souls.
SLYGARR 1 year ago 4
@SunnyLovetts To the contrary, some folks look upon anyone on tv as a God or as having some position of authority because they have a show on tv. These guys are used to people talking normal and fawning over them everywhere they go. I say you need to speak to them in a tone that is not violent, but yet speak as if you have authority, or a an expert in your subject to snap them outta the trance and atleast listen a little. Otherwise you just sound like some namby pamby whiner.
cloudsifter11 1 year ago 2
you are a pussy kid hahaha... uhh i probably would lose. hahaha, you shame the movement,
joshfatzick291 1 year ago
Wow.. you guys were really aggressive that guy too. Why go after this guy and the daily show when there are bigger people to go after. If he doesn't believe 9/11 then why try to convince him? He wasn't in the plot so why keep going after him? The dude sits at a desk answering emails all day about production and staff. Seriously man, go after someone else. You do not look professional and come off as slightly crazy.
panictryouts 1 year ago
The writer that hit you is so fired from the Daily Show! Sue him for 3 million dollars, should be an easy win. All those writers usually act like their gods but their nobody's when they do their contracts for a show.
Z3P3G3 1 year ago 3
@Z3P3G3 I think they were just over annoyed. The truth can be annoying sometimes.
SunnyLovetts 1 year ago
We are change is the best!!!! Keep it up guys.....great work.
daisyroots 1 year ago 4
Rory Albanese burn in hell
nottinmatterz2day 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
nottinmatterz2day 1 year ago
Jon Stewart is to the Left what Glenn Beck is to the Right.
reboottees 1 year ago 19
Jon Stewart is just another puppet on a string, mouthing the same old tired government terrorist line, and if Jon Stewart had any morals what so ever he would be ashamed of his staff and offering his apology to we are change and pay for any damage that was done.
markhansel1 1 year ago
You should have asked Jon if he'd looked at the evidence.
vidmanx0 1 year ago 3