Added: 5 years ago
From: sonic61
Views: 131,664
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (271)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the new series of the fairy tale? Harry Potter and magic plane?

  • Бред, тор разделает эту хуйню под орех.

    Особенно если пускать сразу 2-3 ракеты

  • @pesecification он всегда двумя стреляет...

  • Troppo bella questa pubblicità =)

  • Fuck me. The Americans would be proud of this over hyped, over dramatized, unrealistic piece of propaganda bullshit. I hope this is supposed to be a comedy.

  • The migs are pretty good but I think the eurofighter would win.Su's are just ade in china :P. Btw does the eurofighter has a parachute? I've seen it a couple of times, but maybe It's only the prototype??

  • Codename "Magic" five two? Nato Phonetic Alphabet they must call "Mike" five two.

    Regarts from Germany

  • This is the another trailer from "behind enemy Lines" :D

  • Su - 35 gone so quickly, haha

    how about adding a bit of reality to the vedio.

    I am not russian, but i know russian fighters arent

    trash like shown in these vedios.

    Atleast not the Russian Air Force,

    export models are questionalble though

  • @TheHeavypanzer

    Russia just has two of the Su-35 and one of them is able to fly.

  • TROLOLOLOL Seriously now... Gotta love it! Totally a "Behind ENemy Lines" ripoff.

    I've seen this video during aircraft presentation... Hardly anyone could keep from laughing. Still lovable plane. In reality.

  • cool)

  • literally LOL. so very much wrong with that... "commercial(?)".

  • Is it a movie?

  • Go Europe!!!....

  • at time== 219 seconds if you snap the yoke over like that at refuel velocity you will slap you skull inside your cranium due to canopy not being gameplay

  • overly exaggerated.

  • @shumayelahmed "overly exaggerated" - properly nomenclatured "hyper-stimulus" in infowar

  • At 4:09 British L85 assault rifle with the OSA crewman, fucking fanstatic.

  • Comment removed

  • LOOKS NICE, lovely toy.

  • the iron cross is missing on this baby ;)

  • propaganda...

  • Looks like at su35 press button boom

  • What a spot!!!???

  • Boeing F/A-18E/F/Growler Super Hornet IS THE BEST NOn-Stealth fighter EVER!!!!!!!!!

  • EADS menas european air defence system right?

  • @blablubb12345 thanks man

  • Current price of a Rafale F3: 143 million €

    Current price of a Typhoon A3: 272 milion € (78% of over cost),

    For a European project that is not bright .

    Look at the last british report, a Typhoon is far more expensive than a Rafale, you can buy two Rafale for one Typhoon, and the upgrade to reach real capacities for ground attack missions would be available only in 2018 whereas the Rafale is already able to accomplish this type of missions.

    So Rafale is better, facts prove it.

  • no.even a qaam-missile like the one in the video would stall-out @ the 90degrees aoa.in reality the missile would fall with the nose towards the ground and fall out off the sky like a stone caused by an overheated engine-collapse.

  • no doubting the typhoon is a formidable craft, but why make all adversaries in Bollywood look like idiots? kinda boring

    start again

  • It seems that audience type for this promo is Idioto Ignorante de la Morono Grande Pathetico.

  • It is a comedy for the naive Western taxpayers ?:)))

  • @Granit1973

    It's a european aircraft. The evil west has nothing to do with this cool plane.  The Hollywood movie, yes, but not this commercial. Damn you are stupid.

  • @zvastianx cool plane? Only in the movies for teens. Poor Europe can not build a modern fighter. With the exception of France;)

  • @Granit1973 Yes blatently, which is why the British invented the first jet engine and currently hold the EU's best fighter jet. The british Typhoon is also the most agile, I would rather pick it for dog fighter puposes than say an F-22A or a F-14D. The typhoon also has XLAA, QAAM and tomahawk missles, which by the way are the best missles in the world and the americans buy them. If the Americans brought their own plane and their own missles they would have a really big shock.

  • @ReconSparton Americans are practical and therefore buy good things in many countries. But it does not mean their inability to make a similar weapon.

    P.S. Jet engine invented by Frenchman Maxime Guillaume.

  • @Granit1973

    "The first patent for using a gas turbine to power an aircraft was filed in 1921 by Frenchman Maxime Guillaume.[1] His engine was to be an axial-flow turbojet, but was never constructed, as it would have required considerable advances over the state of the art in compressors."

    Cant really say if he invented it if we dont know if it works?

  • @G777GUN He's just bitter that EF is superior to anything Russia currently has in production. The bulk of Russia's AF consists of Mig 29's & Flankers. The SU35 is essentially a modded Mig 29 but there's only been a few made because of engine issues. Even India doesn't want them and selected EF/Rafale over it. Thales UK are even having to upgrade the electronics in India's Mig 29's lol. Russia's AF is rusting away. The PAK-50 is an underpowered tin can mate.

  • @G777GUN Nevertheless, he invented the first jet engine.

  • @ReconSparton

    I would be careful on the F-22 statements. While I am no fan of the F-22, it does have performance that's very close to the EF2000 and with its much superior RCS reduction techniques, it might have a deciding advantage in a 1 vs 1 engagement. If you are equipping whole air forces, then that might be another issue if you can afford 2 EF2000s versus 1 F-22

  • @Granit I'd be careful of criticizing Europe if I were u. Russia's become the most dangerous place in the world to fly, according to figures from the AS Network. Russia now surpasses even the Democratic Republic of Congo in the number of plane crash fatalities this year lol. One hundred and twenty people have been killed in eight fatal accidents - all of them in Russian-built aircraft.

    h t t p:/ / news . sky . com /home/world-news/article/16099­572

    Just give up & buy Boeing/Airbus m8 :)

  • @TheARMAProductions And what does this have to obsolete in its infancy Eurofighter? LOL

  • @Granit I'm keen to find out what you mean by 'obsolete'? I can only assume you're referring to traditional VLO tech which Russia is trying to catch up on. The tech that fails in adverse weather conditions and can be detected by advanced EW systems such as PIRATE. EF uses EW systems such as active canx to hide it electronically. This tech recieves, distorts then sends the signal back out of phase thus hidig the jet. EF's AESA will be able to jam BVRAAM anyway taking the fight into WVR

  • @Granit1973 It's all about the sensors these days. Russia & China are still way behind in this regard.

  • @TheARMAProductions You know nothing about modern russian sensors. Your opinion about the actual combat effectiveness of the FE while nothing is confirmed. And do not neglect the opportunities of Chinese industry;)

  • @Granit1973 "You know nothing about modern russian sensors."

    None of know allot about any nations sensors. All we have are opinions based on what we can find online. Nobody is going to know what would happen unless these jets fight. As for China's Industry...all they do is copy. This is why they don't have a single high quality brand. Just try to name one :) They make cheap copies of Russian/Western technology.

  • @TheARMAProductions It is enough to copy was not worse than the original:)

  • @Granit1973 "Buying a jet engine in England was a great deal. At that time it was fast and reasonable solution"

    Well the Mig 15 gave the Sabre a run for it's money which was kinda funny lol. I have to disagere with China's copies being better than their Western counter parts mind you. China is well known for making shit. Where people want to be concerened lies with the future. China is learning. They have high average IQ's but have so far shown little creativity and this is the key for them

  • @TheARMAProductions Chinese high-tech sectors of industry are very young. Still ahead.

  • @Granit Give examples. I want to learn. This is just a claim. China doesn't even have AESA at the moment. China isn't even able to develop cars which is why they were caught spying on French car makers Renault. We have a big issue with Chinese made products here because allot of them miss vital components. There's been people killed here due to their electronics blowing up. They don't have a single high quality brand. What makes u think they can develop high tech sensors? What are these sensors?

  • @Granit1973 With respect...this is typical YT for you bro. Plenty of claims but short on proof/explanation. I can claim that the UK has a time travel machine but this doesn't make it so.

  • @TheARMAProductions Hi there mate! Your certainly a hard one to get in touch with, to many mails? Happy new year from Sweden!

  • @Melchersson Yeah man. My inbox is overwhelming lol. I've been away for a week and I've had to ignore half of the PM's. Hayypy new years to you too mate. India are about to chose between the Raffy and Typhoon. A decision is expected within a week. Grippen has managed to export and is looking s tho it will get more deals so the future looks good for Grippen. If the Raffy doesn't sell then Dassault will have to close the production lines so they need it more than EADS

  • @TheARMAProductions Do not you think about this scenario that China simply hides the true level of military technology? Judged by the quality of consumer goods rather superficial.

  • @Granit1973 The huge advantage that the West has is that it's different countries/cultures working on solutions from different angles. China is but one culture/country. Everything you see and touch has it's routes in Western developments. It's one thing to make cheap copies...quite another to develop and create new technologies. China has allot of potential but to imply she is superior to the West at the moment is wishful thinking I think. China is at least 20 years behind (but catching ofc)

  • @TheARMAProductions

    That is rather short sighted; Soviet consumer goods were completely shit, yet in 1989 the quality of Mig-29C fighter when armed with R-77 and R-73 could outperform all jets the west had except skyflash armed tornadoes and F-15s. That came as a shock to most western nations.

  • @52111centrumcz It's counter development. The UK's Tornado has an agility disadvantage over Russian jets so UK developed ASRAAM which makes this void. GR4 will fly very low & in excees of mach 1.2 to evade. If it gets into a WVR scrap it will use the ASRAAM with an offbore capability of about 160 degrees. Ozz brought this missile for their F-18's for the same reason. EF recently destroyed SU35 which is why India weren't intrested in it despite it being cheaper & them already having Russian jets

  • @52111 PS: Russia makes very good airframes & this is what gave them the advantage pre super computers. Pre 1990, Russia had the fighters on lockdown (well, the USAF was the only one to be able to compete). This is not applicable nowadays tho because we can make a brick fly using computers. On jets like EF, if the computers fail the jet falls out of the sky. This is not so for Russian jets but they ake allot more skill to fly. Western pilots just have to focus on the mission rather than the jet

  • The 80's were Russia's time. Western Europe has caught up & overtaken in many area's now. This is not to understimate the Russians tho. You never know what they're developing :)

    I can't predict which jet would win because we don't know all the sensitive info about the avionics of these jets but the EF was quite a bit ahead of the SU35 in the MMRCA technical evaluation (super cruise/agility/high altitude performance/sustained g etc). India chose to turn their back on their traditional supplier

  • @TheARMAProductions

    Its a question of wheter it is due to equipment, or due to politics. India wants to become a global player, and they want to forge good relations with other powers besides their traditional ally Russia. They already bought close to 1000 tanks in the past couple of years alone, so the MMRCA might go to Europe to forge new arms/political relations.

  • @Granit1973 You were the one calling EF 'obsolete' yet when confronted it turns out you don't know anything about Russian sensor tech let alone EF's. All of these jets will soon be obsolete anyway. US/UK (so I assume others too) are developing 6th gen jets. 6th gen being full artificial Intelligence:

    watch?v=eITS4R11kGY

    As for the jet engine....like most technologies it has it's routes in a few countries. It was in fact the UK who sold Russia and USA the jet engine. Mig15 anyone?

  • @TheARMAProductions

    Use of a double-s shaped air intake duct on the Eurofighter. The vertical ofset from the inlet almost achieves 100% line of sight blockage to engine engine compressor face. With RAM lining of the duct duct, the combination greatly reduces the frontal RCS due to backscattering. The duct is reminiscent of that used on the F-16 but the latter is a simple single-s shape and exposes about 60% of the compressor face. A straight duct has the largest RCS by far. (Pete Wst/ AIR Int)

  • @G777GUN This explains what an RAF pilot told me about EF's intake duct being classified. They will never allow you to get too close to it. He wasn't able to go into detail like you just did though.

  • @TheARMAProductions

    I found that on a file when doing the analysis. It even has a diagram on how it works. It even shows the Rafale has great all round stealth ability however due to being able to see rafales compressor fan this makes its frontal RCS less superior to Typhoons.

    So what Typhoon lacks in all round RCS it makes up for in the front area. Deadly in a BVR battle. This could mean that reports on Rafale tracking a typhoon at double range could be true. But very decieving.

  • @G777GUN I take all these claims as a pinch of salt mate. They're full of hear say. Most NATo jets have the same kind of radar/sensors etc do there's not going to be allot in it like some fanboys like to wish lol

  • @TheARMAProductions Buying a jet engine in England was a great deal. At that time it was fast and reasonable solution.

  • Let's assume EF comes across a jet like J-20'PAk-50 (assuming those jets are eventually successes), Depending on the radar used the VLO jet may get the first lock on. Assuming it's radar has not already been detected by EF's, As soon as it fires a BVRAAM it will alert it's presence to the EF. The EF will jam the missile with it's AESA with both jets closing rapidly. EF will then track the VLO jet on the infa red spectrum with it's PIRATE and is going to have a huge advantage within visual range.

  • EuroFIGHTER is the best & I strongly believe that it would win the Indian MMRCA and second thing French RAFALE sucks its way behind EF2000.

  • @king5616 Retard,It's gonna be the F-18,cause Boeing is developing out a growth map for how to extend F-18 life and make it only second to F-35 in terms of electronic warfare and maintance

  • Air combat: Rafale vs Eurofighter = 7:1

  • relax people noones buying a plane by looking at this video. it is true that EF is on top in the Indian MRCA competition though. but SU 35 was not a part of that deal so dont know. its a lot of factors that determine who wins in actual combat so good to take this stuff with lots of salt

  • its fuuny how yeall come to this video talking shit about the EF, you all seem to be aero space engeineers and militery experts. ummmm ya lol.

  • This video is very, very, very tacky. They even copied the terrorist missile launch scene from Behind Enemy Lines. FAIL!!!!

    F-22 Raptor eats Eurofigters and Sukuhois' for breakfast!

  • @m4ace But the Raptor cost 300millione and the Eurofighter just 60millione!!!

  • @m4ace Do you know F(ail)-22 (C)Raptor is no in production any more. Expensive unsuccessful rusty toy.

    /watch?v=KaoYz90giTk

    Future is stealth combat UAVs.

  • @m4ace Thats right. Because the F-22 is a Fighter jet, designed for air to air combat. The EF Typhoon is a multi-role aircraft. They are not comparable!

  • @TheKRUEMELTEE a multirole aircraft ? can you explain me how lol. Typhoon is anable to accomplish ground attack mission alone, this capacity will be available in 2018 on typhoon whereas the Rafale already can do that.

    The Rafale is the only real omnirole fighter, and is less expensive than a Typhoon.

  • @titiboo90 Go to Wikipedia.... 

  • @TheKRUEMELTEE I don't need to go to wikipedia, there are to many mistakes and the first is the price of the Typhoon. I read official reports.

  • And 007?

    Where he was?

  • did he drop a nuclear warhead on them on a nuke?

  • very funny video. terrorists with SU-27? And were are bears drinking vodka?

    Seriosly, EF is ugly duck. Su-35 much more efficient.

  • One more this it just brought down a SU-35 in just a blink?? LOL

    I guess not, SU is also one of the best out there.....

  • Is the Eurofighter a multi-role jet fighter?? So can it match a air dominance fighter like the F-22??

  • 4:57 turning on afterburner when an IR sam is going after you..... real smart.

  • esto es una maquina

  • Stop fighting against each other. Russians are also Europeans and we should stanmd together against other global threats.

  • @B190489 *Cough Islam Cough*

  • @B190489 rival powers don't work together because they compete on money and shares, except when they get pounded by far greater power, just like when they all ganged up against germany in WW2 because germany was the most advanced & strong among them,

  • @B190489

    Lol. Anyone will be annoyed at their jets getting shot down in a fictional vid. Maybe we should add fictional aircraft for it to shoot so it wont annoy anyone.

  • @B190489

    Russians are asians, you fucktard.

  • HEY SLUTS INFOWARSoCOM

    HAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAHA

  • GOD SAVE OUR QUEEN!!!! cheers from the commonwealth, and the Queens common land of Canada

  • @MrCanada967 your a god save the queen slud, saying it even though your not english, your a canadian enough said, slud.:D

  • this is propaganda propaganda propaganda

  • i doubt it-any communist pile of crap (like a mig, sukhoi...) would be raped because there onbaord systems are NOWHERE near as good as the typhoons, and the typhoon would out manouvre and out climb those fuckers ANYDAY! :)

  • su-35??? Ahahahaha... Even su-27 will rape this european piece of crap!!!

  • @gobodrodiont You wish, British Defense Research Agency initiated a simulatet air to air battles with the Su35 the result the Su35 was about as good as the Frenche Rafale, the Eurofighter had a kill death ratio of 4,5 to 1 against the su35 for each fallen Eurofighter 4,5 Su35s where shoot down, and against the american F22 there was a kill death ratio from 10 to 1 against the Su35. the only testet plane witch had worse resluts was the old F15 with 1 to 1,3.

    face it dude russian planes suck

  • @Raffix394 @Raffix394 "British Defense Research Agency" hehehehe... Can you provide something more unbiased?

    And what do you know about Russian planes? What do you know about warplanes at all? You german (or british, or italian) piece of shit whose combat aviation has no real combat experience since the end of WWII?

  • @gobodrodiont first of all gratulations for being stupid and having "@Raffix394 " twice in a message ^^

    With European planes it's like with European Cars, amoung the best of the world.

    Or with tanks russians are known for quantity huge numbers but no qualtity, europeans are known for quality, The German Leopard 2 and it's American brother the Abrams Tank are the best in the world same goes for submarines russians have big heavy nuclear subs that just sink without even beeing hit by anything.

  • @gobodrodiont Well I'm no aviation expert, but I guess neither are you or am I mistaking? but than just look at the specs the EF beats the Su35 in almost everey point, speed, thrust, manoverbilty, the only point where the Su35 scores better is it's range. And check up your self for air to air combat simulations or real fights and show me an example where the Su35 shows superiority over the EF or any other modern EU or US Aircraft.

  • @Raffix394  May I have those specs ? Eurofighter is one of my favs, but I can't see the way of EF beating Su35..

  • Ace Combat 7? 

  • I doubt that anybody would be delighted like the guy was at 44 seconds in the video, to launch a Chemical weapon on a nearby Town... SO what's with the excellent ? :D but nice Plane :D

  • Possibly the most cheesy thing I have ever seen but pretty cool at times.

  • corny piece of crap.

  • Noticed how they used various audio clips from Behind enemy lines?

  • Just like Mr. Burns: "exxxxcellent"

  • Is it me, or is this a little bit... cheesy?

  • @Firespectrum122 its you

  • @Firespectrum122 but this video is old

  • @ThugCologne pfffft, still think it's a corny piece of advertising SHIT. YOu'd thing if they wanted to sell a top of the line plane they would make a REAL video instead of a action/drama that wouldn't fool a 5 year old. 4:19 is a clear copy of Behind Enemy Lines. But, nevertheless, I liked the heartbeat scene.

  • @Firespectrum122 duuh :P...every video that ever came out for new planes etc. is a little bit of drama....still fun though ;)

  • Excellent machine. I hope that soon part of the Slovak Army.

  • all good but su35 is not that easy.

  • @ddrest1 that's right... su35 has possible the best maneuvers... that's not so easy to shoot down him...

  • very fantastic film...i doubt the EFA shot down so easy a sukhoi..

    it is sais that electronic sistem of Su's is not very good..but last generation of sukhoi's...uuff i think they are terrible.

  • Why must every villian like the one at 4:04 smoke a cigar and puff the smoke a certain way. So stereotypical.

  • because it's a commercial and the mass want to see that ; )

  • They didn't really get that actor to say, "Excellent", at 44 seconds in, did they?

    Jesus....why didn't they just give him a fluffy white cat to stroke and tell him to round it off with a "Mwuhahahaha"

    Whoever directed this wants shooting.

  • HAHAHA LMAO noticed dat as well.

  • but hey, their is some evil musik going on ;D xD

  • @Nosteratees LOL Don't forget an eye patch XD

  • Im European, but i have to say that Russian Planes are more cost effective and are cheaper than American and European planes. Russian planes can complete a mission as good as an american / european plane.

  • Yeah i have to admit that European & American technology is reliable. Russian planes have more liability of crashing. Last year there was an Su-27 practicing for an airshow, during the practice, the Su-27's afterburner caught fire and it crashed, sparing the pilot who ejected in the nick of time.

  • Arkanoid1212,

    What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

  • LOL EADS spends so much money on this Promo XD

  • Not bad as a piece of propaganda from the new Soviet Union: At least the URSS had Sukkoi and Mig to compete. EU has this bureaucratic monster, EADS. No wonder that the EF is a combination of old designs without any creativity: The wings of the swedish planes. The intage and cabin of the F16. The squared look of the older soviet jets and so on.

  • ah, for me they way for EF2000 is very very open, F22 will go out of production very soon will be produced in only 145 aircrafts , the US congress voted the forbidden to export this aircraft

  • maybe a F-22 or a F-35 shoots down more russian crap aircrafts but in a dogfight the EF would beat a F-22 or F-35, not easily but it would because of it's agility and it's high-tech aiming systems

  • wenn man keine ahnung hat, einfach mal.... naja kennst den spruch ja

  • ya ni la amuelan estos europeos, a poco creen que solo les van a lanzar un solo misil portatil a la vez, si la filosofia de defensa aerea rusa es lanzar rafagas de misiles

  • eso es sierto ,pero si tu nosaves que el avion esta hay asta que lo ves pasar el typhoo tiene tecnologuia furtiba al igual que el f22 y el f 35 de fabricacion americana el typhoon es el caza que mas se aserca aser el oponente de el f22 y el f35 poque si nolosaves no hay tecnologia que secompare con ellos bueno checale y tedaras cuenta

  • momentan der beste jäger auf der welt............dieses mal sind die usa....nur noch....zuschauer

  • all countries of Europe, good work! =)

  • Yeah Yeahh.... Commie Products are always the best ones as Targets.

  • @sonic61 nah m8, there's also a demo video of a SU35 and the enemy planes are EuroFighters. i think either this is a reply to this movie or that movie is a reply to this one. both funny but interactive !

  • @sektor2001The Gripen won the #Tiger meeting" award!The Czechs completed 664 tasks over a number of sorties during the two week long NATO Tiger Meet and proved their qualities in dozens of simulated air duels, in rescue operations in aid of downed pilots, in seeking and destroying important targets in the opponents’ rear and as protection of helicopters with paratroopers.

  • @Melchersson

    do you have any news reports where I could validate this? Seems very interesting to me (being Czech and all :)

    "Gripen won the #Tiger meeting" award!The Czechs completed 664 tasks over a number of sorties during the two week long NATO Tiger Meet..."

  • @52111centrumcz Theres a report from the red-flag exercise to search for on google.I´m sorry if im in this writing moment cant recall if it was 2 Czech or Hungarians? : ( But I certainly remember that they were without awacs support.

  • @Melchersson found it on the SAAB company website. Interesting.

  • AMAZING

  • hmm not realy possible

  • cool

  • The British Defense Research Agency, had? simulated dogfights against the Su-35 I'll make it short with the resault

    the Frence jet Rafale was equal to the Su 35

    the Su 35 was superior to the F15 with a rate from 1 to 1,3

    but the Eurofighter Typhon had a rate from 1 to 4,5 for every lost Eurofighter 4 and a half Su 35s were shut down

    and the F22 had an even better rate from 1 to 10 althow I'm a EF fan the real world win goes to the 2,4 times more expencive F22 Raptor

  • That's true. But the F-22 would be much too expensive to operate and develop for most countries, even the US. And it can't carry as much maximum loadout as the Eurofigher. The F-35 has the same problems. Both planes are nearly a failure-development in days like these...

  • To be fair the typhoon never outrun the missile, it just out manouvered it as it slowly caught up. (Then launched flairs)