Really great speaker, great lecture! Really enjoyed that! . I suppose you could say this video provided positive environmental stimulus for the cells in my brain.
I think he's on to something and that his basic thrust is an improvement on the current understanding of biology, but I don't think he understands the mechanisms fully and I think there is a good deal of equivocation in how he uses terms.
The agenda behind all the "nouniness" of this guy: intelligent design under a new so-called scientific approach. He can keep his stupidity (genes speak), I keep my clear head.
Thanks for your support Auslander. This thread is not come to my inbox. Someone asked a question about a comment on the twins study in part one, so started reviewing the series and came across this. I LOL at the notion of being a paid troll.
Your defense of my reason for this post was spot on. Thank you.
Perhaps the autistic child only perceives a world lacking affection? It's not a matter of whether the parents are succeeding at loving their child, it's a matter of whether the child is perceiving it as love. For example, the tones of a whistle could be a soothing melody to one person, while aggravating to another.
I myself found this lecture uplifting and positive. I imagine the conclusion must explain the importance of having a belief system that can promote positive growth and protection.
Yea someone has screwed with the vids, after part 6 i think it was, the videos start repeating. would love to see the rest of this dispite the troll below trying to discredit it.
how dare this asshole basically accuse all parents of autistic children of not loving them. I'm about ready to strangle him.
Well, For myself I'll pass. Since his premise is wrong on every account i presume the rest of his conclusions are equally invalid. I don't think I can stomach any more of this bullshit.
He did not 'basically accuse all parents of autistic children of not loving them'. He gave an example of how environmental signalling cause physical changes.
Your response appears to be an emotional reflex. It caused you to miss the point.
watched the whole series. I was with him up until the point he started connecting physical science with BELIEF, and now, LOVE and FEAR.
Assumption, imagination and opinion has somewhere replaced a rigorous scientific basis for this arguement.
bertazoid 3 months ago
Really great speaker, great lecture! Really enjoyed that! . I suppose you could say this video provided positive environmental stimulus for the cells in my brain.
John.
john37309 8 months ago
then negative atmospheres and circumstance lead to mutated birth codes during pregnancy?
TheOlderangel 9 months ago
I love this. Very well explained. And it really all goes back to the old saying. It's really all in your head. lol
I love it.
Sanctyfied 1 year ago
I think he's on to something and that his basic thrust is an improvement on the current understanding of biology, but I don't think he understands the mechanisms fully and I think there is a good deal of equivocation in how he uses terms.
SilverRedIndigo 2 years ago
Sorry but this is not based on good science.
It is just a guys opinion backed with very little fact.
and the facts that are put forward are bent to his own emotional agenda.
bighands69 2 years ago
vitrohype would it be possible to send me or add the link to the full lecture?
91177info 2 years ago
The agenda behind all the "nouniness" of this guy: intelligent design under a new so-called scientific approach. He can keep his stupidity (genes speak), I keep my clear head.
ngocnudang 2 years ago
Thanks for your support Auslander. This thread is not come to my inbox. Someone asked a question about a comment on the twins study in part one, so started reviewing the series and came across this. I LOL at the notion of being a paid troll.
Your defense of my reason for this post was spot on. Thank you.
ExtantFrodo 2 years ago
Perhaps the autistic child only perceives a world lacking affection? It's not a matter of whether the parents are succeeding at loving their child, it's a matter of whether the child is perceiving it as love. For example, the tones of a whistle could be a soothing melody to one person, while aggravating to another.
I myself found this lecture uplifting and positive. I imagine the conclusion must explain the importance of having a belief system that can promote positive growth and protection.
MaineList 2 years ago 4
Yea someone has screwed with the vids, after part 6 i think it was, the videos start repeating. would love to see the rest of this dispite the troll below trying to discredit it.
NewBlueSon 2 years ago
how dare this asshole basically accuse all parents of autistic children of not loving them. I'm about ready to strangle him.
Well, For myself I'll pass. Since his premise is wrong on every account i presume the rest of his conclusions are equally invalid. I don't think I can stomach any more of this bullshit.
ExtantFrodo 2 years ago
ExtantFrodo,
He did not 'basically accuse all parents of autistic children of not loving them'. He gave an example of how environmental signalling cause physical changes.
Your response appears to be an emotional reflex. It caused you to miss the point.
apostatematt 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch it again.
ExtantFrodo 2 years ago
apostatematt, extantfrodo gets paid to troll videos, its pretty obvious if you go to his page. Hes just trying to discredit the lecture.
NewBlueSon 2 years ago
yes, I really want the rest of this lecture, please try to fix for us :D
raonyguimaraes 2 years ago
I think maybe you got some duplicates going on.
dtmbcorp 2 years ago 6
@dtmbcorp Thats because this stuff needs to be repeated to a lot of people....but congratulations to all for getting to Part 9 :)
RandomPsychic 5 months ago