Added: 4 years ago
From: Axle0001
Views: 83,252
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (126)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what is the name of the software you used to make this animation?

  • Mechanically, things move for two reasons, momentum or to move to a lower energy state.

    Momentum is due to a previous energy input and can never increase without a source of consumable energy.

    Lower energy states require the system to be different at the end compared to the start eg a brick pushed of a table falls to the ground. Magnetic systems are the same.

    So a rotating system can never work (unless it consumes power) because every turn is at the same energy level as the previous one.

  • it would be a magnet mill not perpetual motion it would have an energy source and produce less energy than it used. but for something like this to work it would have to be able accelerate from any point you stop it (constant acceleration till top speed is reached). if you place it at a certain point that starts the machine even though you didnt give it a push with your hand it still was given a push and WILL eventually stop.

  • @icarus3375 the problem is that when its in between the points on the wheel that repell its not just slowing down it also wants to stop there. and i know what your thinking just add more magnets right (maybe 2 for each one like in the video) but even with more you will run into similar problems. i took physical science about 10 years ago if im wrong for any reason or if im all out talking out of my ass i apologize...... so i dont care to hear the reasons why im wrong

  • @icarus3375 (looking at page comments) hey guys its me again (sorry for all the posts) i also have (will quickly makeup) atleast four very unique machine ideas. if you want to invest $6M (24 for all) send the money to me and i will research them (in the Bahamas) no guarantee of success XD

  • i have a self charging self running pmm idea i posted on my page. check it out . i dont want millions i just want credit for my idea. it pays for its self.and has only 2 parts that would ever need replaced if warn out . and it (FALLOWS ALL THE LAWS )

  • I invented a breakthrough renewable source of energy that violates the law of energy conservation. I have a proof that there are phenomena that violate the law of energy conservation. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.

    H. Tomasz Grzybowski

    tel. +48-512-933-540

  • @henrykay01 LOL-your definetely not the first! Anybody with a brain and an hour can find the neccessary info to do all this too! Hell-I'll take 6 million too!

  • @Jeenyus1983 : then show me a proof that it is possible at all to violate the law of energy conservation, if you are as smart as I am.

  • Normally I would say pics or it didnt happen. In this case I want it the other way around. Concepts are great and all, but an actual device would be better (and conclusive).

  • You people who believe in this stuff make me laugh. You can't get blood from a stone. You can, however, get money from a SUCKER. This has been demonstrated many times.

  • They have been interviewet in seveveral news coorp. They have stated that they wanne make it into puplic project. They have used dedicated ingineers to make investigation that proof it works.

    To me that sound they want serious buisness.

    and dont sound as a fraut to me.

    Dont think that they are so stupid.

  • I agree making energy from nothing is definitely impossible, but if a machine is built that appears to produce zero-point or free energy, that excess energy could easily be coming from an as yet unknown source. Electricity was one of those unknowns until it was understood, and there are plenty more unknowns yet to be discovered.

  • Spongebob walks, talks and lives in a pineapple under the sea in the Cartoons.  Same with this device.

  • this isn`t an perpetua mobile

    this is kinetic engine

    magnet engine to move engine

  • look good in animation, but in real world!!!

  • kuroshe1, real world physics doesn't matter in the perpetua mobile business. Only the pure, clean believe rules.

    ;-))

  • "In June 2009 the jury gave its unanimous verdict that Steorn had not demonstrated the production of energy"

    Oopsie doopsie. My condolences to all the suckers who invested in this scam.

  • This ORBO like technology was created in the 1980s and has been "black-shelved" ever since.

    US Patent #4613779

  • I'll assume that most everyone here has validated their responses? STEORN has invited the academic community to validate their findings on ORBO. Anyone here been to STEORN and done that? Comments concerning validity without proper scientific validation from source are not productive.

  • @whmitchell03

    Steorn commissioned a "jury" of 22 scientists and engineers to validate the concept. The jury's recent unanimous decision is that it doesn't work (of course!). Meanwhile Steorn are planning a commercial launch at the end of 2009 (ROFL)

  • Please share links to these scientific findings. Thank you.

  • Well, of what I read, Steorn didn't want to show any energy output measurements or something. I'm not judging the situation, I just want answers.

  • gay as helllllllllllllll

    4 nerds only

  • None of these things work or can ever work.

  • The ultimate technology will come when the time is right.

  • Comment removed

  • Sorry but if you pause this every now and then and just look at the relationship of the magnets you will clearly see where it will stop.  I don't want to argue. I believe something like this must be possible but this just won't work.remember if the rotor magnets and the stationary magnet are opposing eachother and pushing; they are pushed back when approaching eachother. Unless you turn off the magnets when then approach eachother and then turn them on once they pass eachother.

  • The energy push the wheel is half of the energy stopping it. Unlike gravity, magnets is a force souce and not flow source. Therefore, using large inertia will be more efficient. This does not violate any science. Science just did not realize there are two parts of a force, action and reaction. Therefore, they describe momentum and kinetic energy with half of the energy cut off. I'm sorry if you don't believe this, I just feel that you're worth the typing.

  • Therefore please make this machine. Based on my calculations, it won't work but if you make this machine, please let me know. I will be happy to see it and examine it and see where I was wrong.

  • What if instead of trying to create perpetual motion we work on figuring out a way to harness the friction of the Earth's rotation? At any given moment we are already moving at high speeds through space - we just don't feel it. If we could somehow hoist a sail so to speak that would harness the "winds" of the subatomic particles we are moving through then we would have a very abundant source of energy.

  • finally someone who thinks outside the sphere.

  • WINNER

    of the YouTube

    NOBEL PRIZE!!

  • until of course the days get longer and longer until half of the earth burns up!

  • On wiki they say that Steorn has sold 5000 licences a 419 EUR!!!

    Hahahahaha, cant anybody be MORE STUPID???? If they really had invented a free energy device, which they have not, then investors buy the licence for litte more than 400 EUR????!!! Yeah, right, the dumpest invention s (facebook) are worth many billions of EUR, but a free energy form that effectively would save the entire planet and mankind is worth 419 EUR??? And you are wondering that Irelands banks are sinking??? :-)

  • @QuantumAnomaly and slow down the earth , then i will have to change my clock every day , no way

  • big mistake

  • big bullshit!!!

  • The best thing about this design is that the magnets only need to be monopoles! So theoretically, the cost to build this machine should only be half that of a machine that has dipolar magnets in the design.

  • i like your humor

  • lol!

  • i get the inside joke. no mono poles, remember me datzfast

  • z2d4th is right.

  • Read Xavi959s reply - if the magnets repel the turntable there will be perpetual motion.

  • This thing will not work, the rotating body will stop between two magnets and does not continue to rotate.

  • the body won't stop because the magnets are repealing each other, not attracting. Therefore, there will be perpetual movement. Is similar to Bedini's principle :D

  • You are just a complete idiot. This Steorn guy belongs behind jail bars. He has already outed himself as a scammer. Of course, he knew that he was talking non-sense, but still he made stupid people like you believe that he was inventing and discovering an infinite source of energy. Why does it do so? To raise money and publicity. Thus, he steals money from scientists and inventors who are seriously interested in finding a solution.

  • Correct. I built a system like this myself in the 80's and yes, the forces balance between 2 points and the machine stops. Pretty obvious really but I just had to try it !

  • Magnets are not lazer beams this doesn't work. Think of the force as a globe.. they are going to push away the income magnet like a brake. No 45 degree magnetic motor design will ever work.

  • The material type used also matters including distance, if the center piece contained metal and bearings, the magnetic force would impact the entire center structure negatively, pushing downward or pulling outward that would be like setting something heavy on top and increase drag and pressure on the parts causing failure or slow speed with sticking. it's like screwing a screw in with an old high powered drill, once screw goes into surface it'd stick and begin riping the head up due to pressure.

  • definately wrong. The angle should match exactly the same exact angle of the outer magnets to create a constant diretion and speed otherwise there's a reverse drag/pull effect that can do 1 of the following, either it starts sticking and stops suddenly, or it doesn't go fast enough and the speed shifts to slow fast and pressure wobbles the surface. WHich would eventually ruin bearings if they use any, which eliminating bearings eliminates friction and part wear slows down the rotational force.

  • The problem with the above design is it doesn't look effecient, it doesn't look like it would produce a high RPM and run smoothly enough because the magnetic force probably wouldn't be strong enough to drive it's momentum regularly enough. It looks like a CD/DVD holder and steper motor concept, the biggest problem is the angle ot the magnets and parts sticking out in the center is a reverse drag.

  • Just like if you turn headlights on with car door's open and run stereo with a battery with a low CCA and bulky electronics after lights will dim, that's why people install a capacitor to act as an extra battery to handle electrical consumption like that do with powerlines and houses so the battery and lower Amp alternator isn't so burdened and you've got more energy stored for greater consumption when the battery and alternator's weak to handle all the electrical power draw.

  • For the same reason a lithium ion is better than a nickel cadium as it doesn't feature the memory affect, for the same reason a car battery with a higher CCA cold cranking amp rating makes car starting easier by providing more energy to handle higher energy consumeption from the load applied when alternator's not running and car is first starting. It's the same reason you can get an alternator that handles 72 Amp, or you can have a 180 Amp etc...

  • Charging a battery accelerates this process, in a car battery acidic gas is emitted from electrolysis process during battery recharge as the electrical plate cells experience corrosion. Better materials last longer, just as a better high output alternator will produce more energy. The quality of your electrical motor and not just rotational speed along and your carefully designed electronic circuits determine the energy output.

  • Batteries eventually chemically breakdown over time inside experiencing corrosion, they lose the ability to maintain charge as the corrosion increases and electrolyte effect decreases, and when that happens and too much power consumption or a good change in electrical load the capacitors orverload and explode unleashing last of the stored energy, this also acts like a circuit breaker preventing grid from chain reacting and the power along that line drops to nothing saving the generator.

  • The reason for using a battery is known as power distribution and load balancing, the same concept power companies use to transmit power over long distances using power lines, capacitors are basically the batteries. If too much power was drawn from alternator(electrical generator) it'd overheat the coils (overload) and quickly burn out and set fire to electrical wiring, this is why fuses, batteries, transformers, and different gauge of wire is used.

  • force that's applied to a piston in such a way rotation is created, a belt connected to a magnetic motor electric motor called an "Alternator" converts this physical energy into electrical output, this AC (Alternating Current) is converted into another electrical type signal which is (Direct Current) output, this in turn is stored into your car's battery, the battery takes the load off the alternator, electrical devices connected are what draw power from the battery not the alternator alone.

  • In reality many principles have not been changed for how things are done, people have improved only certain aspects while relying heavily on only what they know and are familiar with, and yet, what actually works and is time proven works. A car's engine uses explosive kinetic reaction from and chemical to create a physical compressed into electricity.

  • F u all, You people make me sick with the laws of physics!!!!!!!! The laws of physiscs, are bullcrap ok? the only way new technology can come out is to brake the god dam laws of physiscs and it will always be like that! ok, People thought it was impossible to telelport pictures across the world, HEY THEY DID IT T.V... OK!!!!!!!!!!!! jesus, Open your minds up alittle and think, The human mind is capable of doing alot more then you people think.

  • Don't be so fucking dumb. The law of energy conservation has been in place for HUNDREDS OF YEARS. Things like TV were -never- thought of as "impossible", they just hadn't happened yet, in the same way that we think we MIGHT have flying cars one day. If you don't have any fucking idea what you're talking about, don't bother speaking.

  • And the universe was earth-centered for nearly 2000 years. One might be smart to expand one's view before giving advice to others about how things should be seen.

    Teacher:

    Flowers are red.

    Green leaves are green.

    There's no need to see things any other way, than the way they always have been seen.

    Kid: There are so many colours in a rainbow, so many colours in the morning sun, so many colours in a flower, and I see every one!

    - Harry Chapin

  • if you could use less energy to keep it running than you produce from running it.... then it would be possible but that would be a huge challenge

  • No it wouldn't be a challenge, it would be impossible. The laws of physics prevent it from happening.

  • Creating a near constant force is not impossible. Look at how the planets continually revolve around the sun. Look at how time constantly goes on. Isn't a magnet constantly emitting a physical force? The process of converting into the energy type we commonly use is converting rotational physical kinetic energy into electrical energy that is controllable and consumable.

  • You make an interesting point here.

    I am no engineer and have never really given magnetism much thought. You call it a physical force; ok. I find it interesting that most of the videos claiming free power include discussion surrounding magnetism or electromagnetism. Electromagnetism suggests input of electricity, so conservation of energy principle might apply, but what about simple magnetism? It exists and exerts force. Couldn't that force operate electrical generation? Just wondering.

  • They key is converting one form of energy into the form of energy you desire. kinetic/physical energy is used to make generators convert physical force into electrical output via rotational movement and magnetic force that creates a radiated electrical field known as electricity. A dam take water flow and physically rotates generators which are nothing more than electrical motors. Wind and turbine due the same. A gasoline engine in a gas generator or car or riding mower does this too.

  • Umm, actually the Earth will eventually stop spinning due to tidal forces, and the very very VERY weak friction the Earth resists whilst traveling through the vacuum of space ([subatomic]particles and such creating said friction). Of course this would take more time than it will take for the sun to expand into a red giant and (nearly?) engulf our planet.

  • The response below was to "KnightChatX"'s comment:

    "Creating a near constant force is not impossible. Look at how the planets continually revolve around the sun. Look at how time constantly goes on. Isn't a magnet constantly emitting a physical force? The process of converting into the energy type we commonly use is converting rotational physical kinetic energy into electrical energy that is controllable and consumable."

  • Convert windmill turbine to vertical turbine to produce a bit more constant power and operate and lower wind conditions. Oh and put some neodynium magnets at the exact angle the pc fan blades the direction they are facing, place some magnets underneath at same exact matching angle, have it vertically and eliminate some weight and should have constant rotation. get rid of friction and walla.

  • The laws of common sense say the same electrical motor that consumes energy to achieve greater rotation can also be used as a generatoer to generate energy from physical rotation converting the kinatic rotational energy back into electricity. The amount of electricity output is dependant on the quality of the inverter and the initial input supply, and if you use a battery for electrical storage to offset electrical load same concept is used.

  • And I know it's the same concept because you can run a battery to power a device without being plugged into the wall for a given measured amount of time that's partially variable in nature, and you can plug the wall based Alternating Current adapter charger in a wall socket to recharge a battery.

  • The battery was only developed to handle electrical load on a generator. As a result it would give by itself some portable amount of power. We've come a longway since the battery, the capacitor came directly afterwards and the usage of quartz crystals in our time clocks after that, generators have improved since then as well as electronics, and yet we still use batteries because we need to store energy to power electronic devices??? And yet the old 1970's ecoupler technology for wireless power

  • females for NASA tested is barely making light of day today. But hey, it's a fact, it really does exist. And yep, it works.

  • They implemented the power sharing experiment into the space shuttle and international space station to offset power and keep both the station and shuttle powered. Which is why there was some added paranoia when the solar panels had some issue's and the shuttle got damaged, because they were carrying that new solar array which would increase the stations output and the shuttle itself featured 50% the other half of that power sharing technology.

  • A huge challenge like going to Walmart and buying a 12 Volt to 120 Volt invertor? or a jumpstarter pack like Black and Decker Electromate 400? Convert an existing high output car alternator into a wind generator and connect to standard car batteries and use inverter. Use same wiring, remove the alternator and install replace with solar panel and that works too, an amp gauge is good with a good inverter. Ventilate the batteries with a fan and airduct that goes outside house and walla.

  • IF you would draw the flux lines arround the magnets. You would see :) that at certain points magnets are pushing off.. at a point :D that in the movie it just goes to the magnet without a trouble.. FAILURE !!! :D:D

  • IF you would draw the flux lines arround the magnets. You would see :) that at certain points magnets are pushing off.. at a point :D that in the movie it just goes to the magnet without a trouble.. FAILURE !!! :D:D

  • In a maglev train electromagnets are used. It appears that in this model, permanent magnets are used. That's how motion is perpetuated, by using energy to push the train along. The problem with permanent magnets is that they degauss. And yes I think everyone understands that an ETERNALLY perpetual machine is impossible, krishields, but if you can make a machine run for even just a full day without attending to it you're on to an idea that will be sufficient for solving many problems.

  • It will stabilise this very simple design won't ever work.

  • its possible mathematically, but only if u take friction out of the equation =] possibly if they had the central disc levitating?

  • So, if you take the magnets off the thing, would the disk spin longer when it is hand spun or less?

  • See... See, you blow on it and it spins...

  • but mathimaticly it's possible to do.

  • Such a convincing failure.

  • This machine not work :'(

  • why not the mgnets push and suck just like a maglev. if hat works why not this

  • Because they claim this device puts out more energy than is put into it, which violates the second law of thermodynamics. It would be great if such a violation were possible, but so far, nadda.

  • This is the same as the Perendev motor. None of these systems is over-efficient

  • This is an Orbo from Second Life. That is the ONLY place in the universe where you will ever find a working Orbo.

  • Why do people think this would work it will pretty quickly find the equilibrium point and stop.

  • because it only works when you believe it will

  • "There are examples of perpetual motion in the universe. They last for billion of years." If you are referring to planetary motion, those bodies:

    1)Move in a frictionless environment.

    2)Do not perform physical work.

    If it was possible to convert an orbiting body's kinetic energy to work, it would eventually deorbit and plummet into the sun.

  • even those aren't frictionless. Tides steal energy from the orbit, so does pushing through space, space isn't a complete vacuum. There are also gravitational waves being emitted. they run for a long time, sure, but not forever.

  • and you would know that they would not run forever how??? I dont think you will be several billion years old to know weather it will stop or not. We only know a nano fraction of the physics of the universe.

  • nobody can know anything with absolute certainty, but that doesn't justify beleif in perpetual motion machines.

  • The one and only perpetual motion machine persay by definition would be our universe. Especially if you follow all of the laws of physics that we have come up with, the universe is and will remain to be a perpetual motion machine. By the very definition of perpetual motion, one cannot create any physical materialistic device that is perpetual. All physical matter will eventually disolve itself back into pure, uncombined energy. Thats besides the other energy exchanges that happen.

  • it is possible to convert an orbiting body's kinetic energy to work, they do it to increase the velocity of spaceprobes.

  • There are examples of perpetual motion in the universe. They last for billion of years. Since we don't know what will happen to the universe? Thus we don't need something to run for a billion years. Planets going around larger objects, spinning. I spun a top that was not made to be a top. It was off a VCR. It ran for ten min or more. It didn't take me ten+ min to spinning it with my hand to make it last that long. Just up to one second with very little energy.

  • You owe me a minute of my life.

  • hmm, i wonder if i make an animation of me travelling faster than light if i'll get the same kind of attention as steorn. should i flag as inappropriate for being a load of crap?

  • yeah, then make one of something with negative mass! :D you'd make a fortune

  • In theory this would work, I am 17 and have not been in this too long, but if the magnetic repelling force is stronger than the friction, and other things (like the gateway, if this has one) it should in theory go on forever...

  • Except that conservation of energy pretty much fucks that all up.

  • In order to find possibility in an idea like this, one has to have a lack of understanding of how magnetic lines of force work.

    The only way to get energy out of magnetic repulsion is to put it in initially. There is no "gateway" that will save the day; you can't sneak up on a magnet and steal force from it, regarless of what angle you approach it from.

    It doesn't work in theory or practice.

  • i did it, but it dont funktion!!!!!! the problem: there is no separate input and output!!! just think about it, and you will get it!

  • why don't some of you boys do these experiments and then comment on them!

  • holy shit i think exatly the same with magnets the princip was same i draw that and i show it to my phisics teacher and she cant explayn why it wont work she just said it wont...by the way im 17

  • Are we supposed to be impressed with your faulty reasoning?

  • Perpetual motion is simply not possible, this demo shows us nothing just like all the other rediculous videos these bozos release.

  • wow.. im 15 and i thought of almost the exact same concept.

    was a tad different in design but was exactly same in principle.

  • Why the hell is this 4 stars? It shows NOTHING NOTHING NOTHING!

  • Do you morons not realise that this is just a permanent magnet motor? It loses power every spin.

  • Dont call me a Moron U fucked up twat... look up twat..its U

  • actually mine gains power every spin

  • Raise the BS flag! Anyone who managed to get overunity would know better and keep there mouth shut if they had a wife and kids. Your a dead man if you find it. Men in suits will make you vanish.

  • Does it work or not?

  • dumalucky, Start by 'reading up' on Magnets.

    Then factor in Sean McCarthy's statement..."There are these energy anomalies at certain speed ranges with certain magnetic configurations and that's pretty much how we managed to convince ourselves that it was worth pursuing."

    Does it work or not? The Jury is still OUT.

  • Well lets hope it does.. but perhaps there is another way! without magnets! and in the most unexpected way. Cheak out 'FUELLESS HEATER NO FUEL NO GAS NO WOOD NO GREEN HOUSE GASES' on you tube. Claims of 70% overunity.. And some are in use and the users claim over unity from verifide tests!! . Apart from that..its so simple and prob the best and safest way to heat water!!

  • what if change 1 magnet on stator to electric magnet and connect it to rotor energy generator and let the electric magnet use a fraction of overall power generation for a small push the faster it goes the more energy it generates the more powerful the next push is ? correct me ..

  • Chances are there will be some unexpected problem..But Great!! thats what we need.. people who say 'what if' and not people who say 'no way' Do it! great and good luck

  • why dont they just film there device in 360 degree and get it posted on youtube they can do that at least

  • Nice video! I'm abit surprised anyone, little alone Steorn, would bother with this design. Messed with this and variations of it, but could never achieve anything. There have been 2 examples of this same concept on youtube for months that were dead ends. Do you know anything about steorn's Q1 design concept or if they have given out any information about it?..... Have a nice day!

  • Nice rendition Axle, now get beyond 60 seconds and you might just solve the energy crisis lol

  • Thanks RB !! But I think 60 seconds is the limit of what I can do with this one.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more