I liked it as a re. it was thought out and smart on your end! I don't agree with it, but either way you made your point! i love that you believe in fighting an idea with an idea!
yes, it's hypocritical for the videomaker shouldn't censor comments. but why is the argument weak? is it 'quote mining' to quote the president's reply? president bush was paternalistic and sexist, saying that they shouldn't have had 'their feelings hurt,' as if they were babies. the video's argument could have been better, yet they were banned from 100s of radio stations. the quotes were from mainstream news sources, just unbelievable in this day and age, right? why are there quotes to mine?
I think that the reaction was based on the principle that seems to be pervasive there which says that you mustn't criticise the President. To argue that this is sexist is obviously ridiculous.
Having said this, however, do you not cringe slightly when O'Reilly says that these women "deserve to be slapped about"? Do his words not remind you of the abuser justifying his violence? Or the rapist who says "she was wearing a miniskirt, she was asking for it"?
Well, it's played multiple times in the ideo you discuss in this video - his is the US-accented voice saying something along the lines of "these foolish women deserve to be slapped about." At least we agree on O'Reilly, though!
Argus, there are so many feminists that cannot handle debate or opposing opinions just like the person you are countering here. They delete the different views, block the user or screen the comments. I have yet to see a supporter of men's rights do this.
I just watched the other video and it never shows anything relative to what the director claims as them being unjustly attacked for being women. The chics failed to realise that their audience, country, would not be okay with statements that were unpatriotic. They still have careers. Believe me a male country artist doing the same could consider his career gone. I could go on about her one sided arguement.
Awesome job! So many of the feminists just have no sense of balance at all, feminism is almost like a religion to them, and boy do they like to shut up dissenting views. I do think more men are waking up though.
When they say that they faced worse because they are women, shouldn't they have showed the response to similar acts of "treason" that men had carried out. The video was cause and consequence, with no relation to gender bias. When you say something is worse, you are compelled to provide a yardstick for measure, because the question, worse than what comes directly to mind. No wonder the comments were disabled.
hey arguseyes, i was the person who sent you the link of the dixie chicks.. hmmm.. guess what man.. that video cannot be commented upon at ALL,,,.. your comment totally murdered the author.. good job man.. keep it up.. small things like this can make a huge diff soon.. chao dude.. God Bless...
I remember. The woman who made the video came onto one of my threads calling me names straight off the bat. I got the impression that she was just an incredibly nasty person as many of these types are.
She gave up and walked away. Also, what about the people who commented and agreed with her. What about their views?
You can leave a video open but not look at the comments on it.
Another video that blocks comments and PM's certainly from me is Domestic Violence 20/20 news. The caring "Christian" person behind it seems to think that criticism of a mentally ill man being sentenced to 36 years in jail for DV in which the victim was neither hospitalised, nor sought help for her husband is uncalled for!
Yes this is irritating. You can be arguing a point and when you come to deliver the tour de force they simply remove it rather than answer. The video "Feminism" is an example. The mark of an intellectual coward and proof positive that feminist ideas collapse under close examination.
Thats the one! Where she complains about males and then demands the protection of males (patriarchy) Lol! There are others as we know. It might be worth collecting a list of these vids!
Superbear. Feminism from mzpreetykitty. I placed a reply giving an example of a female paedo. I saw it posted, refreshed, viewed it. Next day it was gone! To be fair they havn't censored me apart from that comment and I finally got it to stay on the third attempt!
Feminists are frightened of debate, because they know their arguments are based either on lies or on exaggerrations. You will find it difficult to find a feminist who will allow debate on their own territory, hence why your comments and response video are clearly absent from view.
I agree. However, I don't think that their reticence to debate is due to a conscious process of fear due to their lack of facts.
But rather due to a process called cognitive dissonance which occurs on a subconscious level. This will result in a disagreeable and pugnacious attitude based on insecurity.
Basically. I don't think they know their ideas are full of crap.
Argus, feminists generally DO know their arguments are severly flawed. We could argue the pychology until the cows come home, but the fact remains that feminists, when directly challenged on their territory, silence disagreeable messages. You can test this yourself; drop by a feminist forum or blog, and try to debate a feminist on her own territory.
Argus, good vid. I watched the link vid you provided, and can tell you now this was nothing but feminist propaganda.
There were no actual arguments there, only odd snippets of some comments (bimbo) used to describe the critics of the Iraq war/Bush. Men and women have been criticised for dissent, it is nothing new, but the maker of the vid had an agenda:to promote femprop.
The fact that the maker of vid closed comments is further evidence of feminist suppression of the advancement of debate.
Oh, not you! It was just rhetorical, I guess. If people cannot think of a logical way to respond, they result to ad hominim attacks out of defensive ignorance. It seemed like that's what people were doing with the Dixie Chicks.
Right, I though you were having a go, which would be a shame as we seem to be having a great meeting of minds so far.
As I stated in the video. The situation around the Dixie chicks seemed retarded to me at the time. Perhaps I could have put it more.. academically. I would be annoyed if I paid tickets for a venue and got the artists political mumblings. But the reaction was silly.
The author of this video failed to create a convincing argument that this was a sexist situation.
When you, as a person, set out from the outset looking for slights, then you are going to find slights. To ask the question "did they pay a higher price because they were women" and then back it up with quote mining and red herrings after the fact makes you a person with biased intentions who will end up at your predefined viewpoint by any means possible.
PLEASE POST YOUR RESPONSES TO THE ORIGINAL VIDEO HERE. THIS VIDEO HAS BEEN RENAMED TO BRING IT UP IN THE RELATED VIDEOS PANE. DISCOURSE WILL BE EXISTENT FOR HER VIEW WHETHER SHE LIKES IT OR NOT.
Our posts, and this video response will not show up. The author of the original video has started commenting on my "bad feminist part 2" video??? I don't know why she's there but it's getting quite heated (I just called her retarded) so come on over!
ok, you kind of scare me away from wanting a relationship. i think i want to stay celibate, and remain that way.
opal1920able 2 years ago
try camdump,blogspot,com guys
seeherdance1 2 years ago
Meet all horny girls LIVE at LATESTGIRL,COM
stockslvlstocks805 2 years ago
i cant read that
cutegurl315 2 years ago
I liked it as a re. it was thought out and smart on your end! I don't agree with it, but either way you made your point! i love that you believe in fighting an idea with an idea!
roxann7699roxy 3 years ago
yes, it's hypocritical for the videomaker shouldn't censor comments. but why is the argument weak? is it 'quote mining' to quote the president's reply? president bush was paternalistic and sexist, saying that they shouldn't have had 'their feelings hurt,' as if they were babies. the video's argument could have been better, yet they were banned from 100s of radio stations. the quotes were from mainstream news sources, just unbelievable in this day and age, right? why are there quotes to mine?
adriantabatha 3 years ago
You make some excellent points in this video.
MGTOW 3 years ago
ArgusEyes you are Awesome Ive Watched most of your videos You should seriously Making a TV show well i would watch it anyway but yeah good job
zombielick 3 years ago
I think that the reaction was based on the principle that seems to be pervasive there which says that you mustn't criticise the President. To argue that this is sexist is obviously ridiculous.
Having said this, however, do you not cringe slightly when O'Reilly says that these women "deserve to be slapped about"? Do his words not remind you of the abuser justifying his violence? Or the rapist who says "she was wearing a miniskirt, she was asking for it"?
w0033944 3 years ago
I don't like O'Reilly so I didn't hear him say that. It sounds like a stupid fucking thing to say though and I don't agree with it.
ArgusEyes 3 years ago
Well, it's played multiple times in the ideo you discuss in this video - his is the US-accented voice saying something along the lines of "these foolish women deserve to be slapped about." At least we agree on O'Reilly, though!
w0033944 3 years ago
Ah, OK. I don't have the best memory in the world so I'm not good at remembering the content of videos I've dealt with a long time ago.
ArgusEyes 3 years ago
No problem - just thought I'd remind you.
w0033944 3 years ago
Argus, there are so many feminists that cannot handle debate or opposing opinions just like the person you are countering here. They delete the different views, block the user or screen the comments. I have yet to see a supporter of men's rights do this.
Mountcastle73 4 years ago
I just watched the other video and it never shows anything relative to what the director claims as them being unjustly attacked for being women. The chics failed to realise that their audience, country, would not be okay with statements that were unpatriotic. They still have careers. Believe me a male country artist doing the same could consider his career gone. I could go on about her one sided arguement.
Mountcastle73 4 years ago 2
Really detailed and I agree how they try to silence opposing views or just avoid questions.
Mountcastle73 4 years ago
Awesome job! So many of the feminists just have no sense of balance at all, feminism is almost like a religion to them, and boy do they like to shut up dissenting views. I do think more men are waking up though.
free6796 4 years ago
Dixie Chicks promote sexism and misandry. They are prejudiced against men.
proudguy 4 years ago 3
When they say that they faced worse because they are women, shouldn't they have showed the response to similar acts of "treason" that men had carried out. The video was cause and consequence, with no relation to gender bias. When you say something is worse, you are compelled to provide a yardstick for measure, because the question, worse than what comes directly to mind. No wonder the comments were disabled.
shatvansammy 4 years ago
hey arguseyes, i was the person who sent you the link of the dixie chicks.. hmmm.. guess what man.. that video cannot be commented upon at ALL,,,.. your comment totally murdered the author.. good job man.. keep it up.. small things like this can make a huge diff soon.. chao dude.. God Bless...
antimisandry 4 years ago
I remember. The woman who made the video came onto one of my threads calling me names straight off the bat. I got the impression that she was just an incredibly nasty person as many of these types are.
She gave up and walked away. Also, what about the people who commented and agreed with her. What about their views?
You can leave a video open but not look at the comments on it.
ArgusEyes 4 years ago
Another video that blocks comments and PM's certainly from me is Domestic Violence 20/20 news. The caring "Christian" person behind it seems to think that criticism of a mentally ill man being sentenced to 36 years in jail for DV in which the victim was neither hospitalised, nor sought help for her husband is uncalled for!
jbgood3 4 years ago
Yes this is irritating. You can be arguing a point and when you come to deliver the tour de force they simply remove it rather than answer. The video "Feminism" is an example. The mark of an intellectual coward and proof positive that feminist ideas collapse under close examination.
jbgood3 4 years ago
Is that the video with the chick emoting into the camera for men to basically stop being the raping beating bullies that they are?
ArgusEyes 4 years ago
Thats the one! Where she complains about males and then demands the protection of males (patriarchy) Lol! There are others as we know. It might be worth collecting a list of these vids!
jbgood3 4 years ago
I can't watch it. I physically can't, I have to turn the damn thing off.
ArgusEyes 4 years ago
I am not surprised. Her voice is a bit like running your nails down a blackboard!
jbgood3 4 years ago
Which video is that?
superbear720i 4 years ago
Superbear. Feminism from mzpreetykitty. I placed a reply giving an example of a female paedo. I saw it posted, refreshed, viewed it. Next day it was gone! To be fair they havn't censored me apart from that comment and I finally got it to stay on the third attempt!
jbgood3 4 years ago
Yeah, I watched that one a while ago, and just rewatched it now. Awful video.
superbear720i 4 years ago
Feminists are frightened of debate, because they know their arguments are based either on lies or on exaggerrations. You will find it difficult to find a feminist who will allow debate on their own territory, hence why your comments and response video are clearly absent from view.
iDislikeNationalists 4 years ago
Well said.
EndTheism 4 years ago
I agree. However, I don't think that their reticence to debate is due to a conscious process of fear due to their lack of facts.
But rather due to a process called cognitive dissonance which occurs on a subconscious level. This will result in a disagreeable and pugnacious attitude based on insecurity.
Basically. I don't think they know their ideas are full of crap.
ArgusEyes 4 years ago
Argus, feminists generally DO know their arguments are severly flawed. We could argue the pychology until the cows come home, but the fact remains that feminists, when directly challenged on their territory, silence disagreeable messages. You can test this yourself; drop by a feminist forum or blog, and try to debate a feminist on her own territory.
Report back once you find out how right I am.
iDislikeNationalists 4 years ago
A lot of em' come here. I only seem to get the loons though. Not many rational feminists show up these pages.
ArgusEyes 4 years ago
From what I have experienced 'rational' and 'feminists' mix like oil and water.
EndTheism 4 years ago
Could be.
ArgusEyes 4 years ago
Argus, good vid. I watched the link vid you provided, and can tell you now this was nothing but feminist propaganda.
There were no actual arguments there, only odd snippets of some comments (bimbo) used to describe the critics of the Iraq war/Bush. Men and women have been criticised for dissent, it is nothing new, but the maker of the vid had an agenda:to promote femprop.
The fact that the maker of vid closed comments is further evidence of feminist suppression of the advancement of debate.
iDislikeNationalists 4 years ago
Then how come 'Green Day didn't receive the same backlash for releasing "American Idiot" (basically an entire Iraq war and Bush bashing album)?
Katlebz 4 years ago
Yes, because there is only one variable in that comparison. /sarcasm.
georg1984 4 years ago
Good stuff.
EndTheism 4 years ago
Looks like she renamed her video and disabled all comments.
itachi705 4 years ago
Oh, I'm sorry. Haven't you heard? When someone doesn't agree with you it's considered good manners to defame them derogatorily.
PandyFackleresque 4 years ago
Are you referring to my comments or hers?
ArgusEyes 4 years ago
Both :P
PandyFackleresque 4 years ago
Could you point out where I did this?
ArgusEyes 4 years ago
Oh, not you! It was just rhetorical, I guess. If people cannot think of a logical way to respond, they result to ad hominim attacks out of defensive ignorance. It seemed like that's what people were doing with the Dixie Chicks.
PandyFackleresque 4 years ago
Right, I though you were having a go, which would be a shame as we seem to be having a great meeting of minds so far.
As I stated in the video. The situation around the Dixie chicks seemed retarded to me at the time. Perhaps I could have put it more.. academically. I would be annoyed if I paid tickets for a venue and got the artists political mumblings. But the reaction was silly.
ArgusEyes 4 years ago
No, I think retarded sums it up rather well. No need to beat around the bush.
EndTheism 4 years ago
*pun intended*
ArgusEyes 4 years ago
My comment:
The author of this video failed to create a convincing argument that this was a sexist situation.
When you, as a person, set out from the outset looking for slights, then you are going to find slights. To ask the question "did they pay a higher price because they were women" and then back it up with quote mining and red herrings after the fact makes you a person with biased intentions who will end up at your predefined viewpoint by any means possible.
ArgusEyes 4 years ago
Here Argus, you might enjoy this. It's that same 'MotherGod' chick from before. Apparently she is just spamming everything that disagrees with FEM™
EndTheism 4 years ago
PLEASE POST YOUR RESPONSES TO THE ORIGINAL VIDEO HERE. THIS VIDEO HAS BEEN RENAMED TO BRING IT UP IN THE RELATED VIDEOS PANE. DISCOURSE WILL BE EXISTENT FOR HER VIEW WHETHER SHE LIKES IT OR NOT.
(sorry for the caps).
ArgusEyes 4 years ago
Our posts, and this video response will not show up. The author of the original video has started commenting on my "bad feminist part 2" video??? I don't know why she's there but it's getting quite heated (I just called her retarded) so come on over!
ArgusEyes 4 years ago
watch?v=txrKgymDTUQ
ArgusEyes 4 years ago
My post is not there.
JamesBond77 4 years ago
This happens a lot. Ultimately, they are often posting feminist agitprop that would not survive close inspection. lol!
jbgood3 4 years ago
"Your video response will be posted after it has been approved by the video owner."
Same for the comment.
ArgusEyes 4 years ago
Nope, I just checked, your comment isn't up!
itachi705 4 years ago
Dude, I will try to post a negative comment.
JamesBond77 4 years ago