No, the initially surving core parts doesn't prove the absent of explosives. Especially the explosives induced collapse initiation.
Interesting how some people argue. Structural damage due plane impact and subsequent fires can cause catastrophic collapses but explosives can't? Placed on a floor above or beneath the impact zones, like the 98th floor at WTC1 and 78th floor at WTC2, where large overpressurization and dust ejections were observed, just before any movement of the top?
@MrKoenig1985 if they used bombs to blow up every floor there would not be anything still standing every floor would have been blown up so the core would have been destroyed on every floor and it was not just structural damage it was HEAVY structural damage the plane went right through the tower and on the south tower it got hit on 1 side of the tower thats why it collapes the way of the side that was destroyedand how could the bad guys know where the plane was going to hit before it hit
@movieman175 it appears explosive wee used on the core columns first then n intervals on various floors. it would clearly explain how 30+ floors above the impact zone fell outwards and then shattered before hitting the ground.
There's just something creepy and eery about seeing the huge top portion of the south tower collapsing. Maybe it's because of the sheer size that it was.
There's just something creepy and eery about seeing the huge top portion of the south tower collapsing. Maybe it's because of the sheer size that it was.
The most haunting thing about this video is that, when they see and hear something weird happening right as the tower beings to collapse, they don't fully realize that the whole building is coming down until the top part of the building finally comes back into view through the smoke, and at a very unnatural and severe angle (and headed to the street of course). This is probably obvious at a second look, but if you watch it while not focused on anything in particular, it really takes your breath.
I really think discourse on 9/11 conspiracies would be a lot more civil is people on BOTH sides didn't start out their rants by calling one another names. If you just stuck to discussing the facts and dropped the hate, you might learn something.
That's my two cents anyway. I'll be glad to share what I know on the subject, but the point I start getting insulted is the point that I leave the argument.
its funny to me how ppl keep yelling "OH My GOD" well he won't help you!! it's because off our man made Gods this shit happened in the first place.......
@yob771 It's an expression you fucking moron. People say it when they are in shock. I'm not religious and I say it when something extremely unexpected occurs.
@yob771 While I agree with you that it won't exactly help the situation, I think in nearly all cases "Oh my god" is used by everyone (even atheists) as a general expression oh shock and/or surprise rather than a plea to a perceived deity.
Btw, It's just an expression. I'm an atheist, and I have been for quite some time now, and I still use expressions like that, for lack of something better.
@yob771 It's not the belief in man made gods that cause this to happen, it's your ignorance of God. More importantly that you, and others, should make and live out man made differences of God when they are all the same; all encompassing, all loving, all caring - all you and me.
@hasufel1337 I don't think anyone want to hear your religious blather. Show me some scientific proof of God or even a valid philosophical argument in favor of him or GTFO
The controlled demolition theories are a freaking joke. HUGE structural damage - extremely HOT fires - thousands of tons of weight above the impacted floors. You don't have to melt steel for it to significantly lose strength. Do a little research somewhere other than "truther" sponsored junk science depots.
go to a good university and get a civil engineering degree, then say that. no one I know who is actually well educated thinks like people like you do.
@TheGiverOfNoFucks You sound well educated yourself. If you're talking about the jokers at ae911troof, their "professional" opinions are outnumbered by engineers in their field who disagree by at least an order of magnitude. Meanwhile junk science peddlers and conspiracy prophets like Richard Gage and Alex Jones are making money hand-over-fist with donations, book sales, advertisements, seminars and videos. Their motives are pretty damn clear. Patriots my ass!
Come on man, have you actually researched it? Did you know there was a third building who fell? 47 stories, not hit by debris, fire or any explosions. It fucking collapsed. Make up your own mind based on actual facts, not just wanting to bash on the people who aren't afraid to go there. Over 1300 engineers and architects have even signed a form saying they thought it was a rigged explosion.
Who told you WTC7 wasn't hit by debris and didn't burn? There's hours of footage of both. It was the only steel structure in history to be allowed to burn uncontrolled for that long.
Read the comment that I responded to so you can reply with something relevant, or in context. We weren't talking about the towers....Building 7 wasn't filled with "a lakes worth of jet fuel" It wasn't hit by a plane. Nice try.
It did have a tank full of fuel connected to a backup generator by a pressurized line. This is what fueled the fires for so many hours. The fuel was ignited by the burning buildings that collapsed on top of it. There are photographs of WTC7 after the collapse of the towers that show the majority of the towers-facing side of the structure having been gouged out by falling debris. WTC7 burned because two burning skyscrapers fell on it and it was full of diesel fuel.
@apopheniacMCMLXXXIX I'm not here to argue, but it just doesn't add up. All of the load bearing columns would've had to "melt" out at the EXACT same time to fall straight down like it did. If it were the case that the towers "threw" a bunch of extra diesel onto WTC7 (which is ridiculous IMO) why was WTC the only building? How was there all this extra fuel after hours of burn? Why didnt the commission report what you said? If the towers "fell" on it it would've destroyed it not passed on fire.
The collapse of the load bearing structure happened before the outer facade. You can see the penthouse structures on the roof caving into the building several seconds before the collapse of the shell. The facade fell as a single unit like a curtain because it wasn't a load bearing structure; all those had collapsed seconds earlier.
I never said the towers "threw extra fuel" on WTC7. All the burning material from the towers gouged out the face of 7 and ignited the diesel inside.
For the record, I'm not here to "argue" either, that word implies being rude and calling names, which I'm not interested in. I'm here for an intelligent debate. Unfortunately, my experience has shown that that's too much to ask for especially on Youtube. ESPECIALLY with subjects like this.
But if you're keen on having a calm discussion without name-calling, then I'll stick around. Don't let me down, I want to believe people still have the common decency to not be a dick anymore.
@apopheniacMCMLXXXIX I'm no "conspiracy" theorist, I can form my own opinion and there's two many holes in the story, too much covering up, too many firefighters and PD who have come forward disputing the official story. It at least deserves are real investigation instead of grandstanding, patting on the back, and whitewashing.
@Nebzz Also, The 9/11 commission reported that building 7 collapsed due to fires caused by "office furnishings" Yeah, office furnishings on a couple floors can collapse a 50 story building at free fall speed in only a couple of hours. But a 35 story building can burn straight through for almost 24 HOURS and NOT collapse. Yeah, but I'm just a whack job for thinking on my own.
The madrid building that burned for hours was reinforced concrete, not steel framing. The comparison between WTC7 and that fire isn't accurate because reinforced concrete responds completely differently to fire than steel does.
@apopheniacMCMLXXXIX It was reinforced WITH concrete, but it was still steel, and every bit of that structure burned for a very long time. To suggest that because it's reinforced WITH concrete mean it can burn over a day and that WTC7 can burn MINIMALLY BY OFFICE FURNISHINGS for only 2 hours and collapse completely is asinine, IMO. How many NYPD and NYFD people have to come forward and talk about countdowns and explosions. It DESERVES another investigation not more political grandstanding
The definition of reinforced concrete is concrete reinforced with steel. The goal is to create a composite material that has the strength of both steel (tension) and concrete (compression). The steel elements were wrapped in concrete, which is actually an incredibly good insulator, so they were never directly exposed to the heat of the fires. As you probably know, steel loses most of its strength at only half of its melting point, so being exposed to fire is a bad thing
@iestrangedi "The Windsor Tower in Madrid burned on most of it's floors for almost an entire day and didn't collapse. It was also steel."
That's only half the story. The outer shell of the building was steel framed, and it collapsed after a couple of hours of burning. The inner core of the building was reinforced concrete which, unlike pure steel framing, doesn't lose most of its structural integrity when it burns. This core is the part that burned for hours and hours on end.
@HaliFins a theory i just made up.....could 'wtc7' have been the concussive force of the explosions or the towers falling that did it? read in a geographic journal that buildings in nyc are only rated for 7.0 earthquakes.....think it got that high after the buildings
That's a very good theory, and I'll be sure to remember it. But remember that it was the only building out of thousands of others that fell except for the other towers, and it too, went into what appeared to be a free-fall, which mimics the behaviour of a building collapsing after the bottom support has been completely removed by use of explosives.
Still looks like a controlled demolition no matter which angle you view it from. If you want answers, direct your questions to those responsible: Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld, etc...
@NikTheJew Sorry but I kinda have to say it does fucking matter if this was a controlled demolition, I'm not gonna argue on the internet, but your saying it WOULDN'T matter if the government did this shit?
@mashedperderders I'm saying 3,000 people died regardless, you have no empirical or even anecdotal evidence to support your claim, and squabbling about your conspiracy theories over the internet is frivolous. So yes, I am saying that.
@nunyabidnez2011 Wow. Doesn't get much dumber than you. It's okay, though, because I'm an atheist - I don't commit both politically and religiously motivated mass murder.
@nunyabidnez2011 you're such a fucking idiot... of course it's not a controlled demolition, don't you understand how physics works? Just watch the damn thing, it's pretty fucking obvious the structure just gives way from the huge massive gaping hole and the fires
@Slacktoo Yes, I do understand "how physics works". You clearly do not. I will not waste time arguing with an idiot on youtube, though, so enjoy your ignorance; it's bliss, I hear.
Fucking idiot. (1) Some nutbags flew planes into a building and got lucky, causing them to collapse the point of stress, as clearly seen in this video. (2) An international conspiracy orchestrated by The Evil Overlords secretly planted explosives in a building without anybody noticing, then hired crack pilots to hijack planes and fly them into those *exact* floors, all so they could later start a war under a totally different pretext.
Well did you get away from the window or did you die?
TheLearning1234 1 month ago
@DukeGoat147 Yeah I know, right?
6709ify 2 months ago
if the wtc went down do to bombs there would not be partsof the core still standing
movieman175 4 months ago
@movieman175
No, the initially surving core parts doesn't prove the absent of explosives. Especially the explosives induced collapse initiation.
Interesting how some people argue. Structural damage due plane impact and subsequent fires can cause catastrophic collapses but explosives can't? Placed on a floor above or beneath the impact zones, like the 98th floor at WTC1 and 78th floor at WTC2, where large overpressurization and dust ejections were observed, just before any movement of the top?
MrKoenig1985 4 months ago
@MrKoenig1985 if they used bombs to blow up every floor there would not be anything still standing every floor would have been blown up so the core would have been destroyed on every floor and it was not just structural damage it was HEAVY structural damage the plane went right through the tower and on the south tower it got hit on 1 side of the tower thats why it collapes the way of the side that was destroyedand how could the bad guys know where the plane was going to hit before it hit
movieman175 4 months ago
@movieman175 it appears explosive wee used on the core columns first then n intervals on various floors. it would clearly explain how 30+ floors above the impact zone fell outwards and then shattered before hitting the ground.
manly427 1 month ago
this video...there are no words...R.I.P
movieman175 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There's just something creepy and eery about seeing the huge top portion of the south tower collapsing. Maybe it's because of the sheer size that it was.
DukeGoat147 5 months ago
There's just something creepy and eery about seeing the huge top portion of the south tower collapsing. Maybe it's because of the sheer size that it was.
DukeGoat147 5 months ago
very impressive footage...this is the picture I also saw when I was in a train going from Newark to NYC
mauquim 5 months ago
The most haunting thing about this video is that, when they see and hear something weird happening right as the tower beings to collapse, they don't fully realize that the whole building is coming down until the top part of the building finally comes back into view through the smoke, and at a very unnatural and severe angle (and headed to the street of course). This is probably obvious at a second look, but if you watch it while not focused on anything in particular, it really takes your breath.
TimeLapseSteve 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I hope one day we can know the full truth.
phlezk 5 months ago
"oh shiit"
alfonzo2205 5 months ago
It's always the women screaming in things like this that really disturbs me down to my core.
Slacktoo 5 months ago
photoshop lol
timbersalesman 5 months ago
the attacks on the world trade center had nothing to do with religion assholes
nomnomdk 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nomnomdk Haha how wrong you are.
mikejsweet 5 months ago
inside job
lazomaniac 5 months ago
@HardcoreGayButtsecks maybe its because a fucking building next to it collapsed into the group about 50feet from it dipshit?
Jbry760 5 months ago
Comment removed
TekinTahsin93 5 months ago
God won't save you! :D
Diedjies1984 5 months ago
the black dude was the wisest "get off the window "
goommm 5 months ago
/watch?v=3Thb-VoooGc
aflsbrng 5 months ago
I really think discourse on 9/11 conspiracies would be a lot more civil is people on BOTH sides didn't start out their rants by calling one another names. If you just stuck to discussing the facts and dropped the hate, you might learn something.
That's my two cents anyway. I'll be glad to share what I know on the subject, but the point I start getting insulted is the point that I leave the argument.
apopheniacMCMLXXXIX 5 months ago
Notice how it falls forward slightly. If it was a controlled demolition it would have gone straight down.
dvdragon 5 months ago
BUT WUT ABUT TEH LOOSE CHANG?!
BrianM8685 5 months ago 6
I wonder if "Oh my god! Oh my god!" sounds to Arabs the same way "Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbarr!" sounds to us.
ivanisavich 5 months ago
Where is your god now?
youtubedude 5 months ago
I wish there was better camera work. They could have caught a good shot the 'spire' collapsing.
quakerorts 5 months ago
Well we won't be using Boeings to deliver pizza anymore.
Elven2k9 5 months ago 2
OH MAH GAWD DURKA DURKA DURRRR
TehDubba 5 months ago 3
Not bad picture quality for a home video camera from 2001 don't think ?
frenchpet 5 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
its funny to me how ppl keep yelling "OH My GOD" well he won't help you!! it's because off our man made Gods this shit happened in the first place.......
yob771 5 months ago 68
@yob771 I'm an atheist, but I still have a tendency to say phrases like that and friends that say "Bless you".
Should probably get out of the habit though ^^
STiXz92 5 months ago 5
@yob771 Why didn't you help?
Povidius 5 months ago
@yob771 They weren't asking God to help them. They were shocked, learn the difference fuckwit.
XGodsXPlanX 5 months ago
@yob771 It's an expression you fucking moron. People say it when they are in shock. I'm not religious and I say it when something extremely unexpected occurs.
su0rtin 5 months ago
@yob771 wut? man made gods?
Styx9001 5 months ago
@Styx9001
Yeah, what? Did gods make themselves?
tgseason12 5 months ago
@yob771 how can that even be funny to you? it was such a tragedy and all you can think to say is "its funny"? something is terribly wrong with you.
miriwalshe 5 months ago
@miriwalshe read the comment, i diden't say 9/11 was funny, i said ppl yelling "OH My GOD", is funny to me, as in strange,
yob771 5 months ago
@yob771 I can understand that, sorry for being harsh with what I said. A terrible thing for me to do.
miriwalshe 5 months ago
@yob771 While I agree with you that it won't exactly help the situation, I think in nearly all cases "Oh my god" is used by everyone (even atheists) as a general expression oh shock and/or surprise rather than a plea to a perceived deity.
lordylor 5 months ago
@yob771 Thanks for clearing that up bro...
Btw, It's just an expression. I'm an atheist, and I have been for quite some time now, and I still use expressions like that, for lack of something better.
MyBadGamertag 5 months ago
@yob771 That's fucking idiotic.
WildWe5 5 months ago
@yob771 Trrrroooollleedd
zackpetersps3 5 months ago
@yob771 It's just a common phrase, you ignorant slut.
JrdnGrn 5 months ago
Comment removed
movezig1 5 months ago
Comment removed
csmakio 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@yob771 how are people upvoting you
csmakio 5 months ago
@yob771
If you're trolling, then damn.
If you're serious, get off your atheist high horse asshole.
sarge777 5 months ago
@yob771 fuck off man.
enzofall 5 months ago
@yob771 It's not the belief in man made gods that cause this to happen, it's your ignorance of God. More importantly that you, and others, should make and live out man made differences of God when they are all the same; all encompassing, all loving, all caring - all you and me.
hasufel1337 5 months ago
@hasufel1337 I don't think anyone want to hear your religious blather. Show me some scientific proof of God or even a valid philosophical argument in favor of him or GTFO
yob771 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All of you 'Truthers' should watch my videos if you want some REAL TRUTH.
Just Sayin'......
PypeBombPictures 5 months ago
stupid bitches with their screaming voices...
thegreatestg 5 months ago
The sheets of paper in the air... just before they were in the offices.
Mugrs 5 months ago
just all round sad
mdavidson4341 5 months ago
OMG Well where was he, truth is either dead or non existant. Still a cool clip.
shammon1 5 months ago
wow
IAmTheMusicMan200 5 months ago
Someone yelled "SICK!" lmao
ofnumbers 5 months ago
@ofnumbers I believe it was "SHIT!"
leigh1986 5 months ago
That is just horrifying... O.O
NorthboundFox 5 months ago
ذق إنك أنت العزيز الكريم
JoKeRyaT 5 months ago
The controlled demolition theories are a freaking joke. HUGE structural damage - extremely HOT fires - thousands of tons of weight above the impacted floors. You don't have to melt steel for it to significantly lose strength. Do a little research somewhere other than "truther" sponsored junk science depots.
0x07AF 5 months ago 4
@0x07AF
lol ignorant people like you.
go to a good university and get a civil engineering degree, then say that. no one I know who is actually well educated thinks like people like you do.
TheGiverOfNoFucks 5 months ago
@TheGiverOfNoFucks You sound well educated yourself. If you're talking about the jokers at ae911troof, their "professional" opinions are outnumbered by engineers in their field who disagree by at least an order of magnitude. Meanwhile junk science peddlers and conspiracy prophets like Richard Gage and Alex Jones are making money hand-over-fist with donations, book sales, advertisements, seminars and videos. Their motives are pretty damn clear. Patriots my ass!
0x07AF 5 months ago 6
@0x07AF
Come on man, have you actually researched it? Did you know there was a third building who fell? 47 stories, not hit by debris, fire or any explosions. It fucking collapsed. Make up your own mind based on actual facts, not just wanting to bash on the people who aren't afraid to go there. Over 1300 engineers and architects have even signed a form saying they thought it was a rigged explosion.
HaliFins 5 months ago
@HaliFins
Who told you WTC7 wasn't hit by debris and didn't burn? There's hours of footage of both. It was the only steel structure in history to be allowed to burn uncontrolled for that long.
watch?v=uFJa9WUy5QI
apopheniacMCMLXXXIX 5 months ago
@apopheniacMCMLXXXIX
The Windsor Tower in Madrid burned on most of it's floors for almost an entire day and didn't collapse. It was also steel.
iestrangedi 5 months ago
@iestrangedi Windsor Tower wasn't fueled by a lakes worth of jet fuel either.
Nebzz 5 months ago
@Nebzz A lakes worth? You really just said that?
Read the comment that I responded to so you can reply with something relevant, or in context. We weren't talking about the towers....Building 7 wasn't filled with "a lakes worth of jet fuel" It wasn't hit by a plane. Nice try.
iestrangedi 5 months ago
@iestrangedi
It did have a tank full of fuel connected to a backup generator by a pressurized line. This is what fueled the fires for so many hours. The fuel was ignited by the burning buildings that collapsed on top of it. There are photographs of WTC7 after the collapse of the towers that show the majority of the towers-facing side of the structure having been gouged out by falling debris. WTC7 burned because two burning skyscrapers fell on it and it was full of diesel fuel.
apopheniacMCMLXXXIX 5 months ago
@apopheniacMCMLXXXIX I'm not here to argue, but it just doesn't add up. All of the load bearing columns would've had to "melt" out at the EXACT same time to fall straight down like it did. If it were the case that the towers "threw" a bunch of extra diesel onto WTC7 (which is ridiculous IMO) why was WTC the only building? How was there all this extra fuel after hours of burn? Why didnt the commission report what you said? If the towers "fell" on it it would've destroyed it not passed on fire.
iestrangedi 5 months ago
@iestrangedi
The collapse of the load bearing structure happened before the outer facade. You can see the penthouse structures on the roof caving into the building several seconds before the collapse of the shell. The facade fell as a single unit like a curtain because it wasn't a load bearing structure; all those had collapsed seconds earlier.
I never said the towers "threw extra fuel" on WTC7. All the burning material from the towers gouged out the face of 7 and ignited the diesel inside.
apopheniacMCMLXXXIX 5 months ago 2
@iestrangedi
For the record, I'm not here to "argue" either, that word implies being rude and calling names, which I'm not interested in. I'm here for an intelligent debate. Unfortunately, my experience has shown that that's too much to ask for especially on Youtube. ESPECIALLY with subjects like this.
But if you're keen on having a calm discussion without name-calling, then I'll stick around. Don't let me down, I want to believe people still have the common decency to not be a dick anymore.
apopheniacMCMLXXXIX 5 months ago 2
@apopheniacMCMLXXXIX I'm no "conspiracy" theorist, I can form my own opinion and there's two many holes in the story, too much covering up, too many firefighters and PD who have come forward disputing the official story. It at least deserves are real investigation instead of grandstanding, patting on the back, and whitewashing.
iestrangedi 5 months ago
@Nebzz Also, The 9/11 commission reported that building 7 collapsed due to fires caused by "office furnishings" Yeah, office furnishings on a couple floors can collapse a 50 story building at free fall speed in only a couple of hours. But a 35 story building can burn straight through for almost 24 HOURS and NOT collapse. Yeah, but I'm just a whack job for thinking on my own.
iestrangedi 5 months ago
@iestrangedi
The madrid building that burned for hours was reinforced concrete, not steel framing. The comparison between WTC7 and that fire isn't accurate because reinforced concrete responds completely differently to fire than steel does.
apopheniacMCMLXXXIX 5 months ago
@apopheniacMCMLXXXIX It was reinforced WITH concrete, but it was still steel, and every bit of that structure burned for a very long time. To suggest that because it's reinforced WITH concrete mean it can burn over a day and that WTC7 can burn MINIMALLY BY OFFICE FURNISHINGS for only 2 hours and collapse completely is asinine, IMO. How many NYPD and NYFD people have to come forward and talk about countdowns and explosions. It DESERVES another investigation not more political grandstanding
iestrangedi 5 months ago
@iestrangedi
The definition of reinforced concrete is concrete reinforced with steel. The goal is to create a composite material that has the strength of both steel (tension) and concrete (compression). The steel elements were wrapped in concrete, which is actually an incredibly good insulator, so they were never directly exposed to the heat of the fires. As you probably know, steel loses most of its strength at only half of its melting point, so being exposed to fire is a bad thing
apopheniacMCMLXXXIX 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@iestrangedi "The Windsor Tower in Madrid burned on most of it's floors for almost an entire day and didn't collapse. It was also steel."
That's only half the story. The outer shell of the building was steel framed, and it collapsed after a couple of hours of burning. The inner core of the building was reinforced concrete which, unlike pure steel framing, doesn't lose most of its structural integrity when it burns. This core is the part that burned for hours and hours on end.
apopheniacMCMLXXXIX 5 months ago
@HaliFins a theory i just made up.....could 'wtc7' have been the concussive force of the explosions or the towers falling that did it? read in a geographic journal that buildings in nyc are only rated for 7.0 earthquakes.....think it got that high after the buildings
hnbsniper 5 months ago
@hnbsniper
That's a very good theory, and I'll be sure to remember it. But remember that it was the only building out of thousands of others that fell except for the other towers, and it too, went into what appeared to be a free-fall, which mimics the behaviour of a building collapsing after the bottom support has been completely removed by use of explosives.
HaliFins 5 months ago
@HaliFins yeah to bad you can see the bottom support in the video after the rest of the building fell around it.
MegaYeshua33 6 days ago
you can see someone jump at 0:30 in the lower left hand corner. :/
ThisAcountsThatOne 5 months ago 3
It's a good thing more than one Israeli-controlled company left or were warned before this happened. They could have been hurt!
livinglegend1187 5 months ago
raped idiots
snafusaurus 5 months ago
Oh my newborn 6 LB 7 oz sweet baby Jesus!!!
jhn1203 5 months ago
Oh my budda!!!
jhn1203 5 months ago
Oh my Allah!!!
jhn1203 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Is that the only thing americans can say when anything happens.. "oh my gawd!"
They all said it 14 times like fucking idiots.
aegisgfx 5 months ago
Comment removed
Slacktoo 5 months ago
@aegisgfx Yes, fucking idiots for freaking out when a skyscraper collapsed. Go fuck yourself with a 2x4.
Meanroachman360 5 months ago
@aegisgfx 9/10, almost made me rage
Vivical 5 months ago
@Vivical don't you mean 9/11?
Slacktoo 5 months ago
lol
nnnjc1 5 months ago
OH MY GAWD
tjkasapoglu 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Still looks like a controlled demolition no matter which angle you view it from. If you want answers, direct your questions to those responsible: Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld, etc...
nunyabidnez2011 5 months ago
@nunyabidnez2011 Way to trivialize a tragedy, buddy. Does it fucking matter?
NikTheJew 5 months ago
@NikTheJew Sorry but I kinda have to say it does fucking matter if this was a controlled demolition, I'm not gonna argue on the internet, but your saying it WOULDN'T matter if the government did this shit?
mashedperderders 5 months ago
@mashedperderders I'm saying 3,000 people died regardless, you have no empirical or even anecdotal evidence to support your claim, and squabbling about your conspiracy theories over the internet is frivolous. So yes, I am saying that.
NikTheJew 5 months ago
@NikTheJew u didn't even understand what he just said...
LaGK1LL 5 months ago
@NikTheJew Yes, it does.
nunyabidnez2011 5 months ago
@nunyabidnez2011 No, it doesn't. See how easy that is without verifying yourself?
NikTheJew 5 months ago
@NikTheJew You have an appropriate name. Were you involved in the planning?
nunyabidnez2011 5 months ago
@nunyabidnez2011 Wow. Doesn't get much dumber than you. It's okay, though, because I'm an atheist - I don't commit both politically and religiously motivated mass murder.
NikTheJew 5 months ago
@nunyabidnez2011 you're such a fucking idiot... of course it's not a controlled demolition, don't you understand how physics works? Just watch the damn thing, it's pretty fucking obvious the structure just gives way from the huge massive gaping hole and the fires
Slacktoo 5 months ago
@Slacktoo Yes, I do understand "how physics works". You clearly do not. I will not waste time arguing with an idiot on youtube, though, so enjoy your ignorance; it's bliss, I hear.
nunyabidnez2011 5 months ago
@nunyabidnez2011 "Still looks like a controlled demolition"
Fucking idiot. (1) Some nutbags flew planes into a building and got lucky, causing them to collapse the point of stress, as clearly seen in this video. (2) An international conspiracy orchestrated by The Evil Overlords secretly planted explosives in a building without anybody noticing, then hired crack pilots to hijack planes and fly them into those *exact* floors, all so they could later start a war under a totally different pretext.
ReductioAdAbsurdum 5 months ago
@ReductioAdAbsurdum It was Thermite not explosives bro.
TheEthug 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nunyabidnez2011 check out the video v=uFJa9WUy5QI
Arachnivore 5 months ago
This is great, historical, unedited footage.
Kudos to you, TheMKMonarch!
DiverseLA 6 months ago