Bubbles are in the brain of Richard Dawkins brain because he is delusional for that reason he escape from simple answer and his answer didn't answer the question because question remain about the Maker of the bubble if in case the assumption is true.
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system to suit their Evo-Hoax agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
Only a fool denys something greater and above human and science. There is no doubt that religions are missrouted but to talk in the other direction is wrong to.
It's nice that all of the gods of the major religions, regardless of any physical proof, are all impossible on logical grounds. And it's even nicer that even on an evidence basis, they're no more likely than Odin. I love you, Euclid.
What was god doing before he created the universe?and why did he create billions of stars/planets etc and only life on very few or even just this one. And why did he create stupid people and pain and suffering. I think our univere could be a tiny grain of sand contained in something incomprehensibly larger. God is just an easy answer for the unknown
I remember doubting my religion, deciding to do research, eventually finding Richard Dawkins on here and feeling immense happiness at having found someone who I agreed with wholeheartedly, who made a profound amount of sense, something that I never once found in church thank science for that. If there is a hell I want to go there to hang out with Dawkins : D and all the other cool lucid people.
Hmm, I guess it depends on whether or not God is actually complex... Because calling God complex by our logic, as mentioned, implies that he is bound by our very universal laws and intricacies.
it annoys me that theists have the gall to say 'the universe came from nothing'. if you turn round to a theist and ask, 'well, who created god', they will then argue that god has always existed. this is (one of many) double standards on behalf of religious people.
The Universe is made up of energy and energy cannot exist forever. But the basic idea of God is a supernatural idea and exists outside of the laws of science, so there are no rules stopping him from existing forever. I do want to make it clear that I am an agnostic that believes that god does not exist, but I don't want to pretend what you said is right and support something that is clearly wrong.
Lol, how cute...I get my own video! One of my friends told me about this a few days ago, and I had to see it for myself to believe it.
And yeah, isn't it great how everyone laughs? Isn't the audience just a shining example of how we should regard those with different viewpoints? I just LOVE the open-mindedness, the total lack of conditioned bias they all demonstrated. It really shows their willingness to engage in civil discussion, and to consider what others have to say. How wonderful!
because liberty university has been proven to be a very backwards institution. thier biology department has on display, dinosaur fosils that are marked as 'of the order of thousands of years old'. that is so incorrect it is FUNNY. hence the laughter :)
I doubt Dawkins will be such a stout atheist on his death bed when he faces his imminent oblivion, if you love anyone on this earth you wouldnt want to believe in atheism..love is god, love is faith and without faith there is not love, just a selfish material husk
the problem is though, it's not about 'wanting' to believe. I don't want to believe there's no all loving god, but unfortunately there's no satisfactory evidence to say she exists.
"without faith there is not love, just a selfish material husk"
History, science, and common experience show that powerful emotional attachments to other beings are a natural, inborn impulse in many animals, including humans. Your assertion that belief in a personified deity is necessary to feel them is entirely counterfactual and self-serving.
Only the occasional sociopath doesn't feel these emotions, and they seem to be religious at least as often as not. There's no connection.
lack that and in my personal perception..you are nothing for no one lives forever..and as Dawkins knows his market audience he also knows his bread basket, death and the grand question of "why are we here" fascinates the young
Actually, zerotran, the U.S. is becoming less Christian relatively rapidly. The number of believers in ANY organized religion is dropping fast, generation by generation, according to every survey I've ever seen.
Of course, the corollary is that belief in vague, goofball spirituality and unorganized belief is rising, but that's at least slightly preferable in my book.
My question is whom or what created the creator?
imtweetydiva29 1 month ago
Bubbles are in the brain of Richard Dawkins brain because he is delusional for that reason he escape from simple answer and his answer didn't answer the question because question remain about the Maker of the bubble if in case the assumption is true.
orgolioitalia1 2 months ago in playlist Richard Dawkins
If you love and trust your parents UNTIL they give you reason not to, that is blind faith..... Is that bad, Professor Dawkins?
fishintheflow 4 months ago
@fishintheflow
No, because there are facts supporting a reason to love and trust your parents. For example they gave birth to you and provide you love and care.
kman13131 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system to suit their Evo-Hoax agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
Dawkins the back tracker.
All that applause was wasted.
watch?v=qZev7hb40uk
(Observable evidence that we have a Maker.)
JungleJargon 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 7 months ago
The Dawkins Delusion
blueeagleTFL 10 months ago
Didn't Bertrand Russell destroy that last argument about a century ago?
GiantSandles 10 months ago
Only a fool denys something greater and above human and science. There is no doubt that religions are missrouted but to talk in the other direction is wrong to.
Germanycalling88 10 months ago
If you can't apply the laws of our universe to god, then how can you know anything about him?
GarretsShadow 11 months ago
THATS FRIKIN EVIDENCE. YOU CAN PROVIDE LOTS OF EVIDENCE FOR GRAVITY.
gulbirk 1 year ago
lol the last question was hysterical
1AceKE 1 year ago
In fairness, there is a clear difference between blind faith and reasonable faith. Reasonable faith doesn't usually end in things getting blown up.
Sirstingray 1 year ago
It's nice that all of the gods of the major religions, regardless of any physical proof, are all impossible on logical grounds. And it's even nicer that even on an evidence basis, they're no more likely than Odin. I love you, Euclid.
pascalyuiop 1 year ago
@pascalyuiop Acualy Odin is more possible
yuo252 1 year ago
@yuo252 How so? To be honest, I'd much prefer the Roman gods.
pascalyuiop 1 year ago
What was god doing before he created the universe?and why did he create billions of stars/planets etc and only life on very few or even just this one. And why did he create stupid people and pain and suffering. I think our univere could be a tiny grain of sand contained in something incomprehensibly larger. God is just an easy answer for the unknown
kopl212 1 year ago 2
Richard Dawkins should become a rap artist.
OTSTRETFORD 1 year ago 2
I remember doubting my religion, deciding to do research, eventually finding Richard Dawkins on here and feeling immense happiness at having found someone who I agreed with wholeheartedly, who made a profound amount of sense, something that I never once found in church thank science for that. If there is a hell I want to go there to hang out with Dawkins : D and all the other cool lucid people.
anetchi 2 years ago
String theory, the theory that connects everything.
slicingwater 2 years ago
God of the gaps; that what you don't know, explain it with God. If scientific knowledge later fills that gap then move God to some other gap.
z3my4l 2 years ago 9
What kind of long-ass disjointed scientific reponse is that? I thought Dawkins was a scientist, not a crack baby sucking up for crack money.
TheRegulator81 2 years ago
Ha ha dawkins got owned!
staum607 2 years ago
when did this happen?
TheGunslingr 2 years ago
not sure exactly, looks like it was at least a couple of years ago though
staum607 2 years ago
Hmm, I guess it depends on whether or not God is actually complex... Because calling God complex by our logic, as mentioned, implies that he is bound by our very universal laws and intricacies.
therexCo 2 years ago
it annoys me that theists have the gall to say 'the universe came from nothing'. if you turn round to a theist and ask, 'well, who created god', they will then argue that god has always existed. this is (one of many) double standards on behalf of religious people.
OliverWinton 2 years ago 14
@OliverWinton Well god created time? Plus every created thing has a creator. The creator is not created or god is not god. Just saying.
CrunchsterXX2 2 years ago
but your argument is still circular. you cannot say 'everything has a creator' and then 'god was not created'. it just dosen't follow.
OliverWinton 2 years ago 2
@OliverWinton
The Universe is made up of energy and energy cannot exist forever. But the basic idea of God is a supernatural idea and exists outside of the laws of science, so there are no rules stopping him from existing forever. I do want to make it clear that I am an agnostic that believes that god does not exist, but I don't want to pretend what you said is right and support something that is clearly wrong.
kman13131 2 months ago
pwnt.
nothingisfree 2 years ago
nice pwnage of dawkin's part
simsi1616 2 years ago
It is funny that everyone laughs when he says "I am a biology major at Liberty University"
Mnangagwa 2 years ago 3
Lol, how cute...I get my own video! One of my friends told me about this a few days ago, and I had to see it for myself to believe it.
And yeah, isn't it great how everyone laughs? Isn't the audience just a shining example of how we should regard those with different viewpoints? I just LOVE the open-mindedness, the total lack of conditioned bias they all demonstrated. It really shows their willingness to engage in civil discussion, and to consider what others have to say. How wonderful!
Snarky15 2 years ago
because liberty university has been proven to be a very backwards institution. thier biology department has on display, dinosaur fosils that are marked as 'of the order of thousands of years old'. that is so incorrect it is FUNNY. hence the laughter :)
OliverWinton 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I doubt Dawkins will be such a stout atheist on his death bed when he faces his imminent oblivion, if you love anyone on this earth you wouldnt want to believe in atheism..love is god, love is faith and without faith there is not love, just a selfish material husk
gabrielsdescention 2 years ago
the problem is though, it's not about 'wanting' to believe. I don't want to believe there's no all loving god, but unfortunately there's no satisfactory evidence to say she exists.
theguinnessofdarwin 2 years ago
"she" haha
gabrielsdescention 2 years ago
"without faith there is not love, just a selfish material husk"
History, science, and common experience show that powerful emotional attachments to other beings are a natural, inborn impulse in many animals, including humans. Your assertion that belief in a personified deity is necessary to feel them is entirely counterfactual and self-serving.
Only the occasional sociopath doesn't feel these emotions, and they seem to be religious at least as often as not. There's no connection.
yohei72 2 years ago 2
lack that and in my personal perception..you are nothing for no one lives forever..and as Dawkins knows his market audience he also knows his bread basket, death and the grand question of "why are we here" fascinates the young
gabrielsdescention 2 years ago
Lack what, exactly? And why is a person nothing unless they live forever? What an odd idea. I'm not sure what point you think you're making here.
yohei72 2 years ago
sorry, there was another half.Damn word limit.Lack love
gabrielsdescention 2 years ago
Oh, well, sure. I'm all for love. I don't know that it's everything, though. Chocolate is also important, and kung fu movies.
yohei72 2 years ago
haha yeah ;) even if god dont exist =D
swedishmetalupyours 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
peace and blessings brothers and sisters.
please watch my video on this topic
sofianbelhedi 3 years ago
Very well thought out answers to a very hard question (the first guy). The second guy is just an idiot.
buddybestor 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hello. I just came to tell you to please accept Jesus if you have not already. God Bless this Christian nation!
jrnh2010 3 years ago
What Christian nation?
Amilitantatheist 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
The United States of America.
jrnh2010 3 years ago
Since when?
Amilitantatheist 3 years ago
I'm sorry buddy, but the Christianity epidemic is spreading all over the US and we are unfortunately becoming "Christian."
zerotran0 3 years ago
Actually, zerotran, the U.S. is becoming less Christian relatively rapidly. The number of believers in ANY organized religion is dropping fast, generation by generation, according to every survey I've ever seen.
Of course, the corollary is that belief in vague, goofball spirituality and unorganized belief is rising, but that's at least slightly preferable in my book.
yohei72 2 years ago 3
No it is you who must accept the flying spaghetti monster into your heart.
2kwolfgang 3 years ago
Well done Dawkins, haha, always has the best answers. Genius.
magicbibledotcom 3 years ago