So why didn't you multiply 462 by 100 to come to your answer like you did with the first 2? Why did the method change?
I understand it would equal to 46200, and it would be wrong. But If it cant be used for the hundreds, why use it this method? Is this a part of the formula? Or is this just a technique/method of laying down the answer/info? If it is just a method, then wheres the real formula?
So why didn't you multiply 462 by 100 to come to your answer like you did with the first 2? Why did the method change?
I understand it would equal to 46200, and it would be wrong. But If it cant be used for the hundreds, why use it this method? Is this a part of the formula? Or is this just a technique/method of laying down the answer/info? If it is just a method, then wheres the real formula?
fleshtheworld 4 months ago
I'm surprised you didn't multiply 462 by 1 as well... lol
little8r07h3r 5 months ago in playlist Developmental Math
I wish I had $645 million dollars. It always helped me in math to think of it as money.
vickiormindyb 1 year ago
i love that you explain your thought-process! This is gold!
SpoiledLogic 1 year ago
thats a big number :)
wrong vid, I was looking for the "Potential energy stored in a spring" video
but nice number though....
damienjeffgomez 1 year ago