So why didn't you multiply 462 by 100 to come to your answer like you did with the first 2? Why did the method change?
I understand it would equal to 46200, and it would be wrong. But If it cant be used for the hundreds, why use it this method? Is this a part of the formula? Or is this just a technique/method of laying down the answer/info? If it is just a method, then wheres the real formula?
I have a way to tell what a number is,you move three spaces back from the end of the number and put a comma and then do it again if it allows you until you get to the end.so 384567990 <<< that just looks like a bunch of numbers but if you write like this 384,567,990 it becomes 384 million,567 thousand,9 hundred and 90.
So why didn't you multiply 462 by 100 to come to your answer like you did with the first 2? Why did the method change?
I understand it would equal to 46200, and it would be wrong. But If it cant be used for the hundreds, why use it this method? Is this a part of the formula? Or is this just a technique/method of laying down the answer/info? If it is just a method, then wheres the real formula?
fleshtheworld 4 months ago
I have a way to tell what a number is,you move three spaces back from the end of the number and put a comma and then do it again if it allows you until you get to the end.so 384567990 <<< that just looks like a bunch of numbers but if you write like this 384,567,990 it becomes 384 million,567 thousand,9 hundred and 90.
MrMGD92 1 month ago
I'm surprised you didn't multiply 462 by 1 as well... lol
little8r07h3r 5 months ago in playlist Developmental Math
I wish I had $645 million dollars. It always helped me in math to think of it as money.
vickiormindyb 1 year ago
i love that you explain your thought-process! This is gold!
SpoiledLogic 1 year ago
thats a big number :)
wrong vid, I was looking for the "Potential energy stored in a spring" video
but nice number though....
damienjeffgomez 1 year ago