It's Miller Time!!! And It's Hockey Night In Canada! To everyone that will die in a planetary Collapse this year..., When you get across the Universe..., There You Are! You lucky devils!
A) Ice melting dose not increase water levels B) look up "MCA" or Medieval Warming Period, and further more the "LIA" or little ice age that followed the MCA. the earth has gone 90% of its existence without icecaps at all. The earth was not flooded then nor will it be if the completely melt. the earth has done this before in the last 900 years of recorded history. CO2 has hey to be "PROVEN" a cause of this warm period.
The disturbing part of this report is using video of a calving glacier and talking about the North Pole melting leading people to think it's the northpole. Nature slapped them in the face and the North Pole ice is still there. B.S. and hysteria.
The worst part is that as ice melts, sun rays reflection diminishes, as oceans absorb heat better than the ice itself due their color. Thus global warming feeds itself.
Parvati, a Canadian singer is thus going to sing in the North Pole to bring more awareness to this issue. We need everyone to do their part, artist, scientists, you!
At the South Pole - in Antarctica - there has been a massive ice increase over the last several years - but we never hear news of that, because it doesn't fit the agenda of the New World Order, who wish to fund it with the carbon tax.
What a lot of crap, I think a few people need to come up here and stand in -40 with a wind chill of -60 to see the ice caps are not melting away. YES there is a summer and winter (long winter).
Oh and Al gore saying the south pole will be gone in 5 years is crap.
Fact that 40% of the ice shelf was gone is a lie, it was 25% and in the last 2 years over 80% of that ice is back, with record ice caps and icebergs on the east side of the south pole.
I have also been shocked to witness an orchestrated campaign by the media to ignore the story or at least minimise its impact, leaving me in no doubt that the media are colluding through falsehoods and propoganda to support a hidden agenda. BBC, Guardian, NY TImes, CNN, etc, etc, have all been complicit, making me conscious that the very highest levels the media is run by oligarchs that share the same covert and insidious agenda.
The urgency demonstrated at Copenhagen to reach agreement looks very suspect. Make no mistake - Copenhagen is not about concern for the planet. It is an important progression to a unified power structure that sits above soverign nations.
I ask anybody that has an interest in contemplating the levels of power hidden behind the curtain, much like the Wizard of Oz, to do their own research. Looking into the Bilderberg Group and the Trilalteral Commission would be a good place to start.
. NEW truth - just out! Global Warming - SEE Professor Bob Carter A MUST see . . . SEE Professor Bob Carter SEE Professor Bob Carter This has become a lot worse than we ever thought it could, and Professor Bob Carter shows us why. NEW truth - just out! Global Warming - SEE Professor Bob Carter A MUST see . . . . .
There were NO weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - just as Dr. Hans Blix said; But, the Republican media machine didn't want us to hear that.
And, there is NO dangerous climate change caused by human carbon dioxide - just as the "independent scientists" are now trying to tell us! But, the Democrat media machine doesn't want us to hear that.
We are made to run from one boogieman to next, as each political party achieves its own agendas for them & their money mates.
There is a 95% probability that global temperatures will rise MORE than 3.5C (6.3F) by 2100.
95%PROBABILITY GLOBAL TEMPS RISE MORE THAN 3.5C BY 2100
MIT News, May 19, 2009:
Research, conducted by MIT and published in the American Meteorological Society's JOURNAL OF CLIMATE predicts a median probability that worldwide surface temperatures will RISE 5.2 degrees Celsius (9 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT) by the year 2100,
Well it's now next year and let's see... Yep there be ice up there.. In fact it's growing.. Oh well we will be seeing a CBS News ALERT on Global Cooling soon.
@lind048 Well it's now 2 years later and let's see... Yep there still be ice up there... In fact it's STILL growing.. Oh well we will be seeing a CBS News ALERT on Global Freezing soon..?
Hate to tell you that humans and technology DOES NOT make climate change,,,,,,,the sun does, it is affecting ALL the planets in the solar system and there is NOTHING we can do about it.
That man fony blair is one lying cunt i think if you believe that we human beings are resbonsible for the planet earth getting warmer then i think you are a cunt for believing a cunt that is fony blair.
I live in Norway- at the museum in my city there is a model showing how the ice melted over Norway 12000-15000 years ago,. The ice was then a part of the north pole) so,,, it has been melting for 12000 years- and Tony Blair and Al Gores scientists belive that the ice just started melting caused by human pollution- and that the north pole is going to be gone by september?? NO iCE ON THE NORTH POLE THIS SUMMER IS A LIE!! Start reading history folks- stop listening to scientists-
No one doubts the existence of ice age in the past. In the present, things are happening much faster than normal. That is the problem. And, these changes are accelerating.
About listening to scientists, that is exacly what the Bush administration reccommended for 8 years. They are the ones commissioned to tell us what is happening.
An ice free polar cap could affect the Gulf Stream.. Don't worry, be happy.
Attn all readers- Please read the 2007 IPCC 'physical science basis' report before making any more denial claims about climate change(its free pdf online). If you get to the end of that and can still disagree and back up your position with published science then come and tell us about it. Anything else is just half-baked rubbish.
um so wat happnd? there was still ice on the north pole... Climate change is natural, it wont destroy the human race, read teh facts. its all bullshit. I assume now 2009 will herald the first ice free north pole?
It's a shame that its already to late to prevent California from completely drying out. Mexico will be too hot to even sweat, there is a 30 year thermal lag in the atmosphere, so all this is from 1978. the worse is yet to come. People who know have already started moving to Canada. Let's just hope the ignorant like yourself die today so that we may die tomorrow.
In the year 1512, an expeditionist mapped Antarctica. There was no ice there then. Today, the ice is 1 km thick. That was only a few hundred years ago...not thousands or so.
How was the absence of ice back then explained when nobody burned fossil fuels?
The only map I found of arctic from 1512 was by Gerard Mercator, a belgian who never travelled more than 400km from the place of his birth. Hardly an expeditionist! So, you take his word for it that the arctic was ice-free at the time? Hilariously, he didn't know about Australia so didn't put it on his globes- or do you think maybe thats because Australia didn't exist in the 16th century?
The Ries map of 1512 was one hell of a guess...it was almost exactly how it looks today. Amazing considering they had no technology to look under the ice...therefore there is one conclusion - there was no ice.
Ha ha! The Reis map only shows the southern hemisphere! Thats why you can't see arctic ice on it! Don't tell me- you are confusing the arctic and antarctic? Jeez, well sorry brother but if your basic geographic knowledge is that poor then you'll forgive me if I ignore your homespun ideas on climate change...
ps.the reis map doesn't show an ice-free antarctic coast as some crackpots claim- its the coast of chile and argentina drawn in the wrong place.
North Pole, South Pole....what's the difference? They are poles afterall. I think you take too much issue with irrelevent issues like what their names are. If there was no ice in the antarctic at one time it just goes to reason that there was no ice in the north. So, if we accept that there was no ice in the south several hundred years ago then we should not be neccessarily concerned about the condition of the arctic today. Unless you want to take issue with my small "A" is used for the Arctic.
Rata4you- You are happy to ignore the vast bulk of 21st century scientific evidence and instead base your opinions about how society react to climate change on a 16th century misdrawn map?
"North Pole, South Pole....what's the difference?". Now THATS what I call comedy! Now I know you are joking...
Misdrawn. Actually it wasn't misdrawn...nobody can fluke out that much. By your argument I could draw your face without having seen it and accurately draw your ears and mouth and hair and you'll say I was fluking. Well, okay then. You have a nice day now.
That map shows the coast of chile and argentina mate. Take a good look at it and think about that you are saying- The clue is that it doesn't show a break in the coast between brazil and what you are calling 'antarctica'- if its such a good map of 16th century southern hemisphere then where has the Amundsen Sea gone?! Or do you think it dried out or something? (Its 1000m deep!)
You have succeed in convincing me that climate change deniers really will believe anything...
What did Tony Blair do about climate change as Prime minister? Abosolutley nothing. He barley did anything to try and stop it. Now out of office, he's got on his high horse about it, smug no it all.
Ignorance masquerading as scientific certainty to push a political point, as is being done by one poster here is inexcusable.
The mistaken idea that melting floating ice wont increase sea level doesn't take into consideration the difference in density between fresh water and salt water. Because it's not as dense as saltwater, freshwater has greater volume than an equivalent weight of saltwater. When melted into the ocean, it adds a greater volume of melt water than it originally displaced.
It may be though that the greater danger of the melting ice will occur with the disruption of climate-affecting ocean currents. Changes in ocean temperatures can, demonstrably, alter these, and cause significant and possibly catastrophic climate changes.
We can model these changes, we can track them in the past with a variety of methods, but sure, we can't know for sure that it WILL happen until it actually DOES happen.
I frankly don't want to undergo the ordeal massive climate change could cause simply because some people don't want to stop crapping in the pool we all swim in.
please look at,/man walk across america/UTUBE IM WALKING ACROSS AMERICA PROMOTING HUMAN KINDNESS AND STOPING GLOBLE WARMING WITH BAMBOO????????I AM ONE MAN TRING TO CHANGE R WORLD thank u armand young bamboothewalk/utube
this is for catoni i think you should recheck your idea coz the ice on glass is submerge rigth? and north pole is not like that the is is not under the water it is on top and under a huge formation of ice
You should perhaps do a little study of the Earth. There is no land at the North Pole. It is the Arctic Ocean, and the Arctic ice floats on the ocean, like the ice cubes in your glass of water. The Archimedes Principle shows that floating ice dislaces it's weight of water. When the ice melts, the water level is the same. It is first year physics. Very simple really. Just like what happens when the cubes melt in your glass of water, the water level remains the same.
The Arctic Ocean sea ice is not what you should be concerned about. And even the Greenland Ice cap sits in a bowl shape of land that has been depressed below sea level because of the weight of the ice. The land of Greenland is like a ring of mountains around the bolw full of ice. And even if the Earth's temperature was eight to fifteen degrees higher would still take a few thousand years to all melt. It didn't all melt even during the Eemian Interglacial.
Well, the problem is, most people can't think in terms of thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, and millions of years. Their little minds believe that the climate they grew up with is the Earth's normal climate.
There is no normal climate for the Earth folks. It changes all the time. Sometimes slowly. Sometimes very fast. And for various reasons. The "It's All Our Fault" blame game is a Political $cam.
im sry r u fucking retard the world was not made 10000 years ago do u know how long it was ago when the dinosurs were here? u cnat say they wernt bc we have proof dinosurs were here millions of years of go.
Oh, and by the way. The whole Arctic Ice Cap can melt and it won't effect the Sea Level. Put some ice cubes in a glass of water and mark a line at the water level. When the floating ice melts the water is at the same level. Greenland?? At even the worst forecasts, it would take the Greenland cap a few thousand years to melt. Same with Antarctica. Technically we are still in an Ice Age because we still have Ice Caps and glaciers. Not out of it yet.
Well, It is not unusual for the Earth to be totally ice free. Our caveman ancestors survived a totally ice-free Eemian Interglacial. Forests north of the Arctic Circle. They also survived the last Ice Age. So did the animals. Roman Warm Period. Medieval Warm Period. Little Ice Age. Etc. Etc. Get a grip buddy. Study some Paleoclimatology and other subjects of past climate. You're aware of what happens around us?? Are you aware of Earth's past climate?? And how quickly it can change sometimes??
It's Miller Time!!! And It's Hockey Night In Canada! To everyone that will die in a planetary Collapse this year..., When you get across the Universe..., There You Are! You lucky devils!
Jai666666666 1 week ago
yes the ice is moving south in winter, it is now called Global Coolng caused by our Sun entering a Grand Solar Minimum.
david222444 3 months ago
Americur.!!??? I don't like that. hahah
Tony Blur.
Snowman374th 4 months ago
A) Ice melting dose not increase water levels B) look up "MCA" or Medieval Warming Period, and further more the "LIA" or little ice age that followed the MCA. the earth has gone 90% of its existence without icecaps at all. The earth was not flooded then nor will it be if the completely melt. the earth has done this before in the last 900 years of recorded history. CO2 has hey to be "PROVEN" a cause of this warm period.
tmaduri 7 months ago
fake and gay
grimm61111 7 months ago
Really? How do you like your cold and snowy winters in England?
Blair is a liar.
judomagyar 7 months ago
stupid fucking humans
boogiebuddy01 11 months ago
Haha we are so fucked....its party time..
redultraman 1 year ago
The disturbing part of this report is using video of a calving glacier and talking about the North Pole melting leading people to think it's the northpole. Nature slapped them in the face and the North Pole ice is still there. B.S. and hysteria.
LetzBeaFranque 1 year ago
Oh Chicken Little, the Earth is thawing…uh, freezing…uh…oh hell, peas porridge hot, peas porridge cold and it's all Chiner and Americer's fault!
ROBERTHUDNALL 1 year ago
I like the way British people say "AMERICER" AND "CHINER"
frankyurban 1 year ago
Scientist are now warning us of another Mini Ice age.
These guys sound like the voices in my head. They can never agree either.
lind048 1 year ago
The worst part is that as ice melts, sun rays reflection diminishes, as oceans absorb heat better than the ice itself due their color. Thus global warming feeds itself.
Parvati, a Canadian singer is thus going to sing in the North Pole to bring more awareness to this issue. We need everyone to do their part, artist, scientists, you!
alegomaris 1 year ago
good bye santa
MRAK47ification 1 year ago
haha..busted
littlerocken 1 year ago
lol
bigb47 1 year ago
does any one know y the north pole is a no fly zone?
linesofblood20 1 year ago
@linesofblood20 Yup.!!
Because you would see Ice.! And it's all Melting back, I mean away I mean.. Well you would catch them in a lie. lol
Snowman374th 1 year ago
blair deserves a room without windows for eternity.
communist pig.
plus a satanist.
get rid of him UK.
henningkemner 2 years ago
There's still ice on the freakin' North Pole...
Tony is lying to all of us...
OzzyGonzalez 2 years ago
nooooooooooooooo=(
Xxashley15l 2 years ago
At the South Pole - in Antarctica - there has been a massive ice increase over the last several years - but we never hear news of that, because it doesn't fit the agenda of the New World Order, who wish to fund it with the carbon tax.
sinularia 2 years ago
What a lot of crap, I think a few people need to come up here and stand in -40 with a wind chill of -60 to see the ice caps are not melting away. YES there is a summer and winter (long winter).
Oh and Al gore saying the south pole will be gone in 5 years is crap.
Fact that 40% of the ice shelf was gone is a lie, it was 25% and in the last 2 years over 80% of that ice is back, with record ice caps and icebergs on the east side of the south pole.
Climategate check it out and get informed.
mazdarx7gx 2 years ago
I have also been shocked to witness an orchestrated campaign by the media to ignore the story or at least minimise its impact, leaving me in no doubt that the media are colluding through falsehoods and propoganda to support a hidden agenda. BBC, Guardian, NY TImes, CNN, etc, etc, have all been complicit, making me conscious that the very highest levels the media is run by oligarchs that share the same covert and insidious agenda.
ClimateFraud 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The urgency demonstrated at Copenhagen to reach agreement looks very suspect. Make no mistake - Copenhagen is not about concern for the planet. It is an important progression to a unified power structure that sits above soverign nations.
I ask anybody that has an interest in contemplating the levels of power hidden behind the curtain, much like the Wizard of Oz, to do their own research. Looking into the Bilderberg Group and the Trilalteral Commission would be a good place to start.
ClimateFraud 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
weallknowitstrue 2 years ago
There were NO weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - just as Dr. Hans Blix said; But, the Republican media machine didn't want us to hear that.
And, there is NO dangerous climate change caused by human carbon dioxide - just as the "independent scientists" are now trying to tell us! But, the Democrat media machine doesn't want us to hear that.
We are made to run from one boogieman to next, as each political party achieves its own agendas for them & their money mates.
SEE Professor Bob Carter
weallknowitstrue 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is a 95% probability that global temperatures will rise MORE than 3.5C (6.3F) by 2100.
95%PROBABILITY GLOBAL TEMPS RISE MORE THAN 3.5C BY 2100
MIT News, May 19, 2009:
Research, conducted by MIT and published in the American Meteorological Society's JOURNAL OF CLIMATE predicts a median probability that worldwide surface temperatures will RISE 5.2 degrees Celsius (9 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT) by the year 2100,
goog2k 2 years ago
What the fuck did you guys do. santa's gonna die.
sickofpeoplesshit 2 years ago 12
maybe if ships would stop breaking the ice up constantly it probably wouldnt melt so much?
detroitsports77 2 years ago
Well it's now next year and let's see... Yep there be ice up there.. In fact it's growing.. Oh well we will be seeing a CBS News ALERT on Global Cooling soon.
lind048 2 years ago 8
@lind048 Well it's now 2 years later and let's see... Yep there still be ice up there... In fact it's STILL growing.. Oh well we will be seeing a CBS News ALERT on Global Freezing soon..?
zoomerlawns 1 year ago
@lind048 I hope you are shoveling as much as I am. All this crap coming down on our heads this winter was supposed to be frozen in the north poles.
RofIStomper 1 year ago
Here comes the pole shift niggarrrrrs
MCDouga11 2 years ago
What she says in the start can't be true, the earliest predicament was 2013...
RemiHas 2 years ago
perhaps thats why using Google Earth i cant see ice in the North pole, but i can do it in the South pole.
avatarprimus 2 years ago
Hate to tell you that humans and technology DOES NOT make climate change,,,,,,,the sun does, it is affecting ALL the planets in the solar system and there is NOTHING we can do about it.
Daphdong1 2 years ago
its true...
MCDouga11 2 years ago
I hope it does n,t happen our children deserve a better (WORLD) . what ever way it goes I hope its the rite way.
Lets stop fighting with each other & get on with cleaning it up.
xitart 2 years ago
Planet x is on it's way, this is not us doing this.
wildnutria 2 years ago
Rasta is the Future - Robert Nesta Marley
MarcelPfeifer 2 years ago
and monkeys may fly out of Tony Blairs butt
mrjeronimo 2 years ago
OK. So the north pole will no longer be a polar bear slushy. Why are we worried?
Xxero0 2 years ago
That man fony blair is one lying cunt i think if you believe that we human beings are resbonsible for the planet earth getting warmer then i think you are a cunt for believing a cunt that is fony blair.
raeburn30 2 years ago
I live in Norway- at the museum in my city there is a model showing how the ice melted over Norway 12000-15000 years ago,. The ice was then a part of the north pole) so,,, it has been melting for 12000 years- and Tony Blair and Al Gores scientists belive that the ice just started melting caused by human pollution- and that the north pole is going to be gone by september?? NO iCE ON THE NORTH POLE THIS SUMMER IS A LIE!! Start reading history folks- stop listening to scientists-
diablovtitsme 2 years ago 2
No one doubts the existence of ice age in the past. In the present, things are happening much faster than normal. That is the problem. And, these changes are accelerating.
About listening to scientists, that is exacly what the Bush administration reccommended for 8 years. They are the ones commissioned to tell us what is happening.
An ice free polar cap could affect the Gulf Stream.. Don't worry, be happy.
TRUMPHENT 2 years ago
Attn all readers- Please read the 2007 IPCC 'physical science basis' report before making any more denial claims about climate change(its free pdf online). If you get to the end of that and can still disagree and back up your position with published science then come and tell us about it. Anything else is just half-baked rubbish.
ech1dna 2 years ago
chiner lol
chicagorilla93 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Don't be serious. It take long time. Just do what you want. NO CARES!
background001 2 years ago
Don't be serious. It take long time. Just do what you want. NO CARES!
background001 2 years ago
oh, people care... just maybe not you.
ConradTheCoinhunter 2 years ago
um so wat happnd? there was still ice on the north pole... Climate change is natural, it wont destroy the human race, read teh facts. its all bullshit. I assume now 2009 will herald the first ice free north pole?
hawzy 2 years ago
It's a shame that its already to late to prevent California from completely drying out. Mexico will be too hot to even sweat, there is a 30 year thermal lag in the atmosphere, so all this is from 1978. the worse is yet to come. People who know have already started moving to Canada. Let's just hope the ignorant like yourself die today so that we may die tomorrow.
dakusahab 2 years ago
are u fucking retarded? Santa is from greenland lol
BadBoyAmusements 3 years ago
In the year 1512, an expeditionist mapped Antarctica. There was no ice there then. Today, the ice is 1 km thick. That was only a few hundred years ago...not thousands or so.
How was the absence of ice back then explained when nobody burned fossil fuels?
Just a thought.
Rata4You 3 years ago
The only map I found of arctic from 1512 was by Gerard Mercator, a belgian who never travelled more than 400km from the place of his birth. Hardly an expeditionist! So, you take his word for it that the arctic was ice-free at the time? Hilariously, he didn't know about Australia so didn't put it on his globes- or do you think maybe thats because Australia didn't exist in the 16th century?
ech1dna 2 years ago
The first human to reach the north pole was in 1908. Everyone before that was just guessing what it was like up there.
ech1dna 2 years ago
The Ries map of 1512 was one hell of a guess...it was almost exactly how it looks today. Amazing considering they had no technology to look under the ice...therefore there is one conclusion - there was no ice.
Rata4You 2 years ago
Ha ha! The Reis map only shows the southern hemisphere! Thats why you can't see arctic ice on it! Don't tell me- you are confusing the arctic and antarctic? Jeez, well sorry brother but if your basic geographic knowledge is that poor then you'll forgive me if I ignore your homespun ideas on climate change...
ps.the reis map doesn't show an ice-free antarctic coast as some crackpots claim- its the coast of chile and argentina drawn in the wrong place.
ech1dna 2 years ago
North Pole, South Pole....what's the difference? They are poles afterall. I think you take too much issue with irrelevent issues like what their names are. If there was no ice in the antarctic at one time it just goes to reason that there was no ice in the north. So, if we accept that there was no ice in the south several hundred years ago then we should not be neccessarily concerned about the condition of the arctic today. Unless you want to take issue with my small "A" is used for the Arctic.
Rata4You 2 years ago
Rata4you- You are happy to ignore the vast bulk of 21st century scientific evidence and instead base your opinions about how society react to climate change on a 16th century misdrawn map?
"North Pole, South Pole....what's the difference?". Now THATS what I call comedy! Now I know you are joking...
ech1dna 2 years ago
Misdrawn. Actually it wasn't misdrawn...nobody can fluke out that much. By your argument I could draw your face without having seen it and accurately draw your ears and mouth and hair and you'll say I was fluking. Well, okay then. You have a nice day now.
Rata4You 2 years ago
That map shows the coast of chile and argentina mate. Take a good look at it and think about that you are saying- The clue is that it doesn't show a break in the coast between brazil and what you are calling 'antarctica'- if its such a good map of 16th century southern hemisphere then where has the Amundsen Sea gone?! Or do you think it dried out or something? (Its 1000m deep!)
You have succeed in convincing me that climate change deniers really will believe anything...
ech1dna 2 years ago
Wut bye bye santa Santa is from FINLAND
KH132 3 years ago 2
bye bye santa
cheatmaster407 3 years ago
SANTA IS FROM FINLAND DUDE !
KH132 3 years ago
Santa Was Born In Bethlehem!
snobbignhoj 2 years ago
santa is from zimbabwe...and lives there to this day
...the reason why he has a red face is cause he always gets sun burned
...and those rain deers ar'nt rain deers they're antelopes
all that i have said is indeed fact...case closed!
XD
kessest 2 years ago
What did Tony Blair do about climate change as Prime minister? Abosolutley nothing. He barley did anything to try and stop it. Now out of office, he's got on his high horse about it, smug no it all.
hi262779 3 years ago
Ignorance masquerading as scientific certainty to push a political point, as is being done by one poster here is inexcusable.
The mistaken idea that melting floating ice wont increase sea level doesn't take into consideration the difference in density between fresh water and salt water. Because it's not as dense as saltwater, freshwater has greater volume than an equivalent weight of saltwater. When melted into the ocean, it adds a greater volume of melt water than it originally displaced.
skelotan 3 years ago
It may be though that the greater danger of the melting ice will occur with the disruption of climate-affecting ocean currents. Changes in ocean temperatures can, demonstrably, alter these, and cause significant and possibly catastrophic climate changes.
skelotan 3 years ago
We can model these changes, we can track them in the past with a variety of methods, but sure, we can't know for sure that it WILL happen until it actually DOES happen.
I frankly don't want to undergo the ordeal massive climate change could cause simply because some people don't want to stop crapping in the pool we all swim in.
skelotan 3 years ago
please look at,/man walk across america/UTUBE IM WALKING ACROSS AMERICA PROMOTING HUMAN KINDNESS AND STOPING GLOBLE WARMING WITH BAMBOO????????I AM ONE MAN TRING TO CHANGE R WORLD thank u armand young bamboothewalk/utube
BAMBOOTHEWALK 3 years ago
this is for catoni i think you should recheck your idea coz the ice on glass is submerge rigth? and north pole is not like that the is is not under the water it is on top and under a huge formation of ice
Fernan1048 3 years ago
You should perhaps do a little study of the Earth. There is no land at the North Pole. It is the Arctic Ocean, and the Arctic ice floats on the ocean, like the ice cubes in your glass of water. The Archimedes Principle shows that floating ice dislaces it's weight of water. When the ice melts, the water level is the same. It is first year physics. Very simple really. Just like what happens when the cubes melt in your glass of water, the water level remains the same.
Catoni52 3 years ago
The Arctic Ocean sea ice is not what you should be concerned about. And even the Greenland Ice cap sits in a bowl shape of land that has been depressed below sea level because of the weight of the ice. The land of Greenland is like a ring of mountains around the bolw full of ice. And even if the Earth's temperature was eight to fifteen degrees higher would still take a few thousand years to all melt. It didn't all melt even during the Eemian Interglacial.
Catoni52 3 years ago
oh shit, why can't we c***s stop it.
Clacatoo 3 years ago
Well, the problem is, most people can't think in terms of thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, and millions of years. Their little minds believe that the climate they grew up with is the Earth's normal climate.
There is no normal climate for the Earth folks. It changes all the time. Sometimes slowly. Sometimes very fast. And for various reasons. The "It's All Our Fault" blame game is a Political $cam.
Catoni52 3 years ago
you are fooling yourself sorry but the world is only ten thousand years old give or take a grand look it up free your mind
expurb 3 years ago
yeah jesus made the earth only 6000 years ago. its in the bible people!
FarangBalls 3 years ago
im sry r u fucking retard the world was not made 10000 years ago do u know how long it was ago when the dinosurs were here? u cnat say they wernt bc we have proof dinosurs were here millions of years of go.
cheatmaster407 3 years ago
haha I was joking dude.
FarangBalls 3 years ago
Agree,it is a scam too lure buck$ out of us.
All planets are warming,so it is just us getting tricked into paying for something we can not do anything about or is not our fault.
FromDimmuLand 3 years ago
Oh, and by the way. The whole Arctic Ice Cap can melt and it won't effect the Sea Level. Put some ice cubes in a glass of water and mark a line at the water level. When the floating ice melts the water is at the same level. Greenland?? At even the worst forecasts, it would take the Greenland cap a few thousand years to melt. Same with Antarctica. Technically we are still in an Ice Age because we still have Ice Caps and glaciers. Not out of it yet.
Catoni52 3 years ago
Well, It is not unusual for the Earth to be totally ice free. Our caveman ancestors survived a totally ice-free Eemian Interglacial. Forests north of the Arctic Circle. They also survived the last Ice Age. So did the animals. Roman Warm Period. Medieval Warm Period. Little Ice Age. Etc. Etc. Get a grip buddy. Study some Paleoclimatology and other subjects of past climate. You're aware of what happens around us?? Are you aware of Earth's past climate?? And how quickly it can change sometimes??
Catoni52 3 years ago