Added: 4 years ago
From: MyEarbot
Views: 219,009
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (339)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Bad days ahead for all those virgins in heaven.

  • after watching hundreds of these,this guy is worst shot in iraq,no offense,love you guys and ladies,keep up the good work

  • holey crap, hit the mo'fo already...  if you cant do that, then land the thing on him...

  • wow those guns aren't very accurate huh.

  • i like when you can see the glowing bullets flying in a curve. almost like bees flying to the target with a big sting lol.

  • what do you do when you have scum growing in your fish tank? You clean out the scum.

  • Close is good enough with a 30mm. Every one of those rounds has a 5 meter kill radius. They might as well be grenades fired from 2700 meters away... They should have just called on a DAP in the first place and been done in one run, but that's just my opinion. But they got the job done, and that's what counts.

  • 졸라게 안맞네. 걍 맞으면 맞고 이거구만...

  • bang... all the roaches are dead.

  • That was some Shit shooting, what a waste of ammunition, I understand that they where 2700m away but wtf.

  • @PerivaleBuses okay, let me get this through your thick skull, that is a m230E1 chaingun, it fires 30mm. a 30mm like all projectiles, slows down in travel, and at 3000 Meters ( they are at 2700M ), a 30mm shell takes about 12 seconds to impact, in 12 seconds a Projectile can be GREATLY affected by outside influences, such as humidity. pressure, and wind, you dont know what conditions they were firing in, so shut up.

  • @ToAstYNaChO

    Hey, idiot, I was in the British Army so I know a bit, but I am not aware of that weapon capability, still think it was a waste of ammunition.

    Also you forgot to mention that they were in an A130.

    Most of those crews are trigger happy because Uncle Sam is very resourceful.

    It was the wrong equipment for the job, Apaches could have done it far better even with the gun or rockets.

  • @PerivaleBuses you are a GRADE A fucking idiot, its an M230, Listen to the fire rate!.Also they are in ONE SPOT the entire video, if they were in an AC130 they would be circling the target. god i HATE ignorant people like you. the US army does not send out AC-130's to eliminate some Bomb planting rag heads.

  • @PerivaleBuses i've read over yours and toasty's comments, and quite politely, you seem to be unaware of a concept. That was definitely was an Apache, at that range, it's true, you have to fire alot of shots. Plus, an Apache isn't going to waste a 20,000 dollar+ plus Hellfire on 2 guys, or risk doing a hydra strafe. So technically, using their 30mm M230 was the right way to go, and anything else would of been wasteful. Kindly go argue about things you know about.

  • @PerivaleBuses i think they were using a submarine.

  • Patriofags in here.

  • Thumbs up if you've been watching random videos with thermal gun cams.

  • 20,000 rounds of ammo,guidence computers, millions worth of chopper.... and they shoot the paddock 100 meters away... good old yanks... guns blazin

  • They looked like they were doing a spot of gardening

  • I suppose you've got to hit something eventually like that.........

  • how far can these cameras see? I'm assuming our troops are quite far away from that road. Thats some dope shit.

  • @DocSicnarf They are 1.7 miles away you hear the pilot say 2700 meters. That's why you see the rounds impacting in a loose formation.

  • Ooh. Interesting to see just how much gravity affects the live rounds (2:34 and on) over that distance...

  • THNX US FORCES FOR WHAT YOU DO OVER THERE FOR US!!! GOD BLESS!!!!

  • You guys need to get your 39Bs to re-calibrate your gun sites. I don't know if the Army changed their MOS number like they changed mine. I was a 35Y which is now 94Y after 2007. I ETSed in 2007

  • You guys need to get your 39Bs to re-calibrate your gun sites. I don't know if the Army changed their MOS number like they changed mine. I was a 35Y which is now 94Y after 2007.

  • Woo - What a waste of ammunition to knock out two scum's - firing indiscriminately far and wide and missing the target. I would not like to be a coalition soldier near by - in case of friendly fire. New weaponry should be introduced such as a gattling that could hit and rip apart a target with deadly accuracy .

  • From 2700 meters away? That is nearly 1.7 miles away! Scary shit! Can't see or hear us surveying nor the shot fired!

    I seriously doubt that we are seeing the image as it truly is. It is zoomed out and blurred. With the hi-tech optics in those machines, we'd be blown away by the detail possible. I want to see what that gunner really can see from almost 2 miles away. (The hairs on their chinny, chin, chins?)

    Nice technology, until they employ it here at home to provide surveillance.

  • So blurry ... we used to get better footage from the Moon ... and WW2 gun camera ... what's up with that? I know farther away and all but damn, the Hubble can zoom out for millions of miles!

  • there are tons of vids like this blowing them up from helos. its over in a second for them and they dont even know what hit them. kind of different from holding them captive and executing them on video like they do to innocents.

  • LOL 

  • You guys need reading glasses and target practice too before you get into the field. Giving these vermins a chance to escape because of ones inabilities to hit the target endangers our soldiers another day.

  • @Tumboltahum dude, they're over a mile and a half away on a moving platform. guns don't shoot strait over that distance, watch other vids

  • @Tumboltahum

    They had really good effect on target for their range and velocity, actually.

  • man he is a bad shot......but he did get them

  • blind???

    

  • How big is the kill box man I see shot going all over the place!

  • @oAINGIRYo with that kind of spread the apache must be shooting from a couple km atleast

  • @oAINGIRYo For the stupid they blowing up ied's too

  • PINCHE PUNTERIA DEL CULO !!

  • the quality of the sound is a shit

  • clearly an ac 130, are you all to dumb to realize the lag between when he fires and when the shots impact.he says at 2700 feat, way to high for an apache. plus the movement of the camera is due to the 30mm cannon fire.

  • @caza00caza 2700 feet is easily doable for an Apache. And the Apache has a 30mm cannon. The max altitude of the Apache is 21,000 feet. So, this was an Apache, buddy.

  • @caza00caza ...he says 2700 METERS dipshit. It is the distance to the target, not how high up they were.

  • @mapache11 what is the difference?

  • @MyOscarMeyerIsOnFire ...since they are not directly over the target, then your question shows a lack of comprehension of some basic geometry.

  • @mapache11

    your comment makes no sense. you lack comprehension in general.

  • @pznerd ..hey fuckwad, if you are 1000 feet DIRECTLY above someone, you are 1000 feet away. If you are flying at 1000 feet, but are NOT directly above them, then you are MORE than 1000 feet away from them.

    Learn some simple fucking geometry shitstain.

  • After the first volley, why not wait to see where impact?

    Then adjust.

  • THis So GOOD GEEZUS THEY are PAWNED!

  • WHO CARE AS LONG AS THE TALIBAN ,,BIN,LARDEN SCUM ARE ,,,DEAD,,,,GOOD JOB US FORCES

  • Where are the "great videos" at earbot?

  • Frustrating having your projectilespread so much.

    I shoot with a scope and a used to it being right on.

    But my targets are much closer.

    Best just to see where the projectiles are heading and adjust.

  • 0:00 what the hell is great about destroying life?

  • @thesonofsons that you save others

  • @thesonofsons if we dont kill them first then they will kill us, do you want to die? HOOAH!!! GO US ARMY!!

  • THIS IS SOOOOO BEAUTIFUL!!!

  • Horrific shooting guy should get removed and sent to a desk lol

  • Terrible shooting.

  • @MetaVita - Notice that it takes more than 3 seconds from the second the gun fires until the rounds hit... If something as fast as a bullet takes over three seconds to get somewhere, you know that's a FAR distance and distance affects accuracy.

  • Damn i wanted to see the last one!!!! They were about to fuck shit up!!!

  • HEY! In War movies the bullets always travel in a straight line on the ground! WTF!?

  • Who the hell thought this was an AC-130? AC-130 circle their targets, and the beginning of this video clearly shows a hover. So obviously it's a helicopter.

  • @ewthmatth I dunno i disagree, why would the helicopters bullets curve at such a short distance?

    And if you look closely the camera is constantly moving

  • The gunner states in this video that they are "2700 meters out." That's over 1 1/2 miles. That's not a short distance. As for the camera moving, I'm not sure why you brought that up since other videos of apaches show the same movement. Finally, the weapons sysetem sounds and acts exactly like the 30mm cannon an apache has equipped. Like I've said to ChaseSpeer, I can't be 100% positive since I wasn't there, but I'd be willing to bet a lot of money this is an apache.

  • @TankManHeavy the camera is constantly moving because of the adjustment of yaw and pitch. watch some ac130 videos, they have a smooth ride.

  • This is an AH-64 Apache helicopter. You can tell by the rattle of the frame when the shooting starts.The 30mm machine gun on an Apache is located under the targeting camera, the shots create vibrations, visible as the rattle of the frame. The cyclic rate of fire is significantly slower than that of the 20mm gatling type, auto cannon that used to be used on AC130, and the distinctive TAT,TAT,TAT sound of the gun, is something you'll hear and recognize in every Apache attack video you'll ever see.

  • the gunner should have went to spec savers

  • did they survive 

  • @AzonClodei and why was this comment label as spam?

  • call of duty modern wafare 2 ;-D

  • Awesome

  • i don't get that weapon , if its shooting in a straight line why is the explostions around them and not straight can any1 explain is it somethink to do with the ammo they using ?

  • @mcwhizzkid123 The aircraft is moving, and there is a distance the bullets need to travel.

  • @ironmb86 OBVS ITS MOVING BUT REALLY WHY AINT THEY HOVERING BETTER FOR GUNNER THEN

  • @mcwhizzkid123 caps really? if they were in a heli they woud be very easy to spot and loud. Flying a few miles up without jets make them very hard to spot. They can spy on the enemy before blowing them to peaces so that way no innocents are killed as well

  • @ChaseSpeer Actually, jets are very loud...even at high altitudes. Most helos can engage on a gun run from almost 2 miles away thus reducing the visibility of the helicopter. Besides, I'm about 99.9% sure this is an AH-64. If these are fighter pilots, they sure don't talk on the radio like fighter pilots and thier gun sounds alot like a 30mm.....Anyway, here's an example of a loud ass F-18 doing it's air support thing:

    watch?v=91XVh7w2QXs

  • @fo694013 its probably an ac130. If they were a heli it would be a completely different video. Ac130 have propellers so they are actually very quite. My comment would probably made more sense if you read what I was replying to

  • @ChaseSpeer Out of curiosity, how would it be different? It looks and sounds almost exactly like every other Apache attack video I've seen. Btw, I did see the comment you were replying to. The one in all caps, right? Your reply still didnn't make "more sense" as you put it.

  • @fo694013 If I have to explain the difference of a giant plane and a heli im not going to reply any more. I never said I was right just stating what I thought was. It maybe a heli but to me it seemed like it was more of a ac130. If im wrong so be but I was going by gut feeling such as bullet drop and such. Btw whats the point in putting it the way I "put it"?

  • @ChaseSpeer You stated that if I had seen the original comment by mcwhizzkid123 that your intial reply was directed at, your comment would make more sense...it didn't. I was trying to find out what you meant by that. Furthermore, you need to work on your "tone" when writing. You did not come off as simply stating "what you thought it was" in your posts. You came off as more of, "I'm right and you're stupid." Even in this most recent post, you still manage to come off as a dick.

  • @fo694013 hey right back at ya champ. The original post of mine yes cause the guy was a d bag

  • Yeahhh USA sucks...

  • Don't fuck with America!

  • All is fair!

  • DAM YOUTUBE JUST UPGRADED ..AWW SHITTTT.....---

    IMA RANDOM RAIN STORM...SHAKKYY SHAKKYYYY

  • MW2 guys, dont ruin a good video.

  • seems an inaccurate cannon to me the spread of impact per burst must have been 30 meters

  • @smokinthepot well, they were also pretty far away, look how long the ammunition takes to impact.

  • @Obsidian1985 Shooting from 2700 meters.. That's pretty fucking far dude

  • That 30mm cannon is just about useless, isn't it? WTF?  What if those had been professional soldiers....and they shot back?

  • @JetMechMA You are being sarcastic are you not? 2700 Meters away..... in the sky....

  • @rainbowsandmoccasins About 1.5 or 1.6 or so miles away. Yeah, so what? Like I said, that 30 mm is just about uselss. Couldn't hit the broad side of a barn. I mean, how much lead you going to expend shooting a couple of goofballs? I am not impressed. In cases such as this it seems it would be better to have a helo with a door mounted mini-gun. Let the Apache stand by with guided munitions in case the enemy throws up any AAA.....but I doubt that the enemy is going to sneak up on these guys.

  • 9 ou to ten roadsides kills the locals or the planters? They are so stupid to even do it. Too bad the terroists do not even know that they have about a 15% chance of being smoked while planting? they are middle ages in their tactics... not much above stones and arrows

  • scary

  • Light those motherfuckers up!!!

  • I believe the gun coils after evry shot so the second bulet is off then the third is off even more and so on.

  • lol I'd love to know how many shots are fired for one kill.... must be a couple hundrets in avarage

  • They are shooting from really far, at the end of the clip pilot says 2700m. Seems kind a waste of ammo shooting so far away...

  • @qettyz they do it from so far for safety & so that the insurgents dont hear the chopper blades & run or try to attack them! they can hover unheard & still be in range to attack

  • Who the hell made that person a gunner?

  • thats a lot of ammo just to kill these bastards.

  • That guy realy can't shoot. But in the end he blew up the entire field so that pig thankfully is wasted. Next time please don't use that much amo, think about the costs please.

  • Once that thing starts firing at you there's no chance of surviving... it's just going to keep shooting till you're dead

  • @desus123OGT No way? I though they killed one of them and let the rest go.....

  • I am a veteran of Just Cause and Desert Storm. I and many others went from one extreme to another, but basically stayed in the freaking hottest damned weather imaginabale. I'll tell you, from experience, war isn't funny. Killing isn't funny. We, the US military, strive to keep civiliancasualties down to a minimum if none alltogether. Before saying anything, best check on insurgent activity and see how many innocents THEY have murdered compared to the US. Claim for the truth, see all of it.

  • povero coglione.....sono 10 e più anni che siete in irak.....e non avete combinato un cazzo...Bin Laden non lo avete mai preso...vai a cagare

  • shit aim!!!

  • hahahahahhahaha arab scum! get some you pedophiles!

  • Ah man! You waisted the last of the city maintenance crew. I'm sure they where only putting in a little overtime fixing all those potholes so they can have a smoother ride for there donkey carts before rush hour came around!

    Poor Bastards!

    Lets Watch That Again!!!

  • those 30mm cannons are so f'in inaccurate.

  • @ryanrenesis Never fired a gun in your life I see. They are -moving- at over 1KM distance on an unstable platform (read helo), and you are calling this fire inaccurate? LOL!

  • death from above baby!

  • what is up with that aim?

  • dear i say ... just like vietnam

  • Yep, you're doing a real good job with the Taliban in Afghanistan!

  • Looks like u can only choose the general area where the munitions going to hit

  • "Operation Violence Free"

  • every one on hear is a KEY BOARD warrior, including me, but im not goin to be a bad ass on here, if i not the at the war

  • Damn get closer! Shot and Drive to the target.

  • i agree get closer. i could see if they were firing at a tank or the guys had rpgs but dam

  • On the com you hear one say 2700 meters, thats 8,858 feet.

  • fuk bud all that ammo for 4 guys?? THIS is ur taxes well spent

  • thats the AC 130 plane

  • This pilot should have his eyes tested and then fired. How was he allowed to fly one of the most deadliest close support aircraft and would have been dangerous to allied soldiers in times of war - killing many by friendly fire.

  • Accuracy by volume hahaha

  • Well I sure wouldn't want to be elminiated either.

  • This thing has horrible aim. They should really recalibrate it.......or it could be the fact that they're really high up and the bullets are subject to wind and atmospheric variables

  • combination of all those factors, the gun shakes, the helicopter isnt perfectly still...i think its mostly just distance....they are really fucking far i mean look how long it takes the bullets to impact

  • The apache can engage at ranges up to about five miles if l'm not mistaken..

    However, they're still effective at strafing runs and whatnot, because they can use their unguided salvos.

  • the turret is not perfecty still when it fires, hence a minute angle difference makes a big difference 5 miles downrange...is what i was trying to say

  • Yeah, definitely. That's why l think the Apache is more suited for close-range engagements, simply because it's impossible to shoot one down with small-arms before it kills you.

    Despite its disadvantages, l still love the 30mm bushmaster though.

  • If you fuck with us we will rain death from the skies on your sorry ass. Period. USA all the way.

  • ye dont want 2 b in the middle of that

  • @TheBigfishcatcher01 i dont want t b in the crossfire of that! Better to be killed by a small 9mm bullet instead of that bombs!

  • this probably cost 10 million

  • And fucked some shit up

  • Thats a few UK born muslims killed good job

  • death from above!!!!

  • Planting season is over.

  • Comment removed

  • well its not the most accuracy killing, but it works ;)

  • The U.S. isn't so much losing power as other countries are gaining. But as of now no one can compete militarily. Russia, China, and the EU navies combined would still get their ass kicked by the US navy, they reign supreme. And the ground forces depend on where the fight is at. A war on American soil and not even the greatest military genius could beat the U.S. Army + Marines+ National Guard+ local militias armed with civilian weapons. It would be a slaughter.

  • Of course. We can scare enemy countries in submission by simply putting an aircraft carrier in their waters.

  • @Archerfenris well i dont think so i agree about the eu part, but China is a good secret keeper along with North Korea and russian have a couple of good shots up they're sleeve and surely a country cant outgun the whole world =)

  • Tell that to Alexander the Great.

  • @Archerfenris Nope we would just starve you. :) guns don't count if a soldier can't use it properly due to malnourishment.

  • @chnsw123 Too bad the U.S. produces more food than it needs. Too bad I fail to see how you could starve a population without beating the Navy. Too bad I fail to see how you could starve such a large country capable of producing enough food for themselves. So basically, too bad your argument is nil.

  • @Archerfenris haha really i do not care war is futile it gives us nothing, the second world war is the only slight exception i can think of.

  • @chnsw123 no sir, arguing over policies in the middle east with those that know nothing about said middle east, is futile. War has a purpose and has had a purpose since the beginning of man. Men have always known that the bigger and stronger can take what they want. If you can't defend yourself...well then, you're fucked.

  • @chnsw123 Starve the USA are you for real, are you suffering malnourishment, or is it just all that fucken inbreding, you my be the dumbest sob on u tube

  • @Kline4661 Malnourished inbred or not, at least i can spell, admitedly it is hard to type with claws where my hands should be but hey my mother is my sister. Dude by all means go fuck yourself.

  • @chnsw123 Duuude so easy to see between your lines, lives at home, no job, no life, wishing he had some money for the dentist, wondering why he get that funny feeling down below, while looking at his sister, and waiting for mum to leave so he can make the biggest choice of the day Porn our u tube comments.Any Question!!!!!

  • @Archerfenris Very true but the element of surprise is the U.S.'s weak point.

  • Excuse me, maybe I am mistaken, but isn't it the US military (combined with their allies) that get their asses kicked by uneducated farmers with obsolete equipment?

  • @NKA23 Yep those uneducated farmers are kicking are ass just like you kicked are ass in WWll. You and chnsw123 should throw down to see who truly is dumbest sob on u tube.Talk about uneducated...

  • @Kline4661 ...Hate to break it to you, but Americans are very uneducated, Due to your cash stricken and poorly funded education system, Americas education system ranks lowest of all the allies, Canada ranks 4th ( in the world)... i wont dare say the rank of USA but lets just say your down there with Ireland and bangladesh...Canada as a VERY well funded education system free for all, a higher graduation rate, and more Canadians attend and finish university than americans poor uneducated you tuber

  • @MrCanada967 And lastly! You're a dumbass. Yes. Let me remind you that Canada has a FRACTION of the population of the U.S., a FRACTION of the economy, a FRACTION of the political weight, and of course LESS THAN A FRACTION of the military power. You guys are basically the pimple on the head of the U.S. congrats. And for all this "education" you succeed in knowing fuck all about the middle east...see me again when you're worthy.

  • @MrCanada967 Was I talking to you, NO... I was commenting on some loser saying that uneducated farmers were kicking our ass, lol never said a thing about America being #1 anyone with .5 of a brain knows this, I live 1.5 hours from Canada and visit often, but as many of my friends up north state, there is a reason most of Canada's major cites are within 150 miles of America,any idea why!!!! Now go dry behind your ears..fucken 21 year old punks.. Any Questions

  • @NKA23 Oh I'm sorry. Where you one of those "U.S. will lose in Iraq" bandwagon people? I have news for you, Iraqs all but done. I see similar signs in Afghanistan. Foreigners and weak-willed Americans cry "waaaaa, go home, waaaaaa" while the U.S. continues to take ground. The ANA grows and more Afghans stop supporting the Taliban. Oh and just a few days ago the Taliban announced they're ready for talks. But nah, you're right, we're "getting our ass kicked" lol. Learn before you speak.

  • @Archerfenris ...lol i dont know if your up to speed with the rest of the world, but America is no longer in control in Iraq, they left months ago so i would hate to sum it up for you but America Accomplished nothing and wasted $50 billion a year in the process, and racked up national debt BIG TIME, hate to break it to you that war were fighting CAN NEVER BE WON... face facts.. and ameriac has pulled most of its forces from iraq, and theres been non stop bombings ever since, IRAQ= EPIC FAIL

  • @Archerfenris ... learn before YOU speak , America left Iraq MONTHS AGO.. why ? because they accomplished nothing and wasted $50 billion a year , Money AMERICA DOES'NT HAVE and got there ass kicked by a hunk of explosive on the side of a road.. Also the mission in Iraq was to occupy and train Iraqi forces and police, and guess what?? since USA left Iraq, theres been non stop bombings, and the forces they trained are getting killed BIG TIME, IRAQ=FAIL , im sure you know that without healthcare...

  • @MrCanada967 Oh boy...where to begin? First off the U.S. is still in Iraq, we don't leave completely 'til next year. Accomplished nothing? Saddam is dead and there's a working democracy in Iraq...hardly nothing, not great, but not bad. Our ass kicked? Wait so we won...but got our ass kicked? You're confusing me. So you admit we won but then say we lost...where's this great Canadian education you speak of? You're contradicting yourself.

  • @MrCanada967 Furthermore. Non stop bombings? Gosh I really can't say much to that because it's kinda like saying Santa Claus exists. Check your facts, just because you watch CNN doens't mean you know something about the Middle East. violence is lower than ever in Iraq. Hate to break it to YOU but uneducated Americans are a stereotype (kinda like you guys and igloos). Why is it my roommate is Canadian and came to this American university instead of a Canadian one?

  • @MrCanada967 Err, huh? Pretty sure the US military is still in Iraq, en masse and with bases everywhere. All of your nonsense aside, it's pretty obvious what you think of the Iraqi people, and the contempt you have for any progress made there. I thought Canadians were nice, and generally didn't like laughing at dead civilians. I guess I was wrong.

  • @F33bs If you think all the people of any country think exactly alike you're delusional.

  • @SruthTeeker It was a joke, in case you didn't realize it. Of course I don't think every Canadian is nice, and they sure aren't all smart, as you so clearly show.

  • @Archerfenris lol thats funny the EU would get its ass kicked by the us navy ... do u know who has the largest navy on earth?? the Royal navy.. also Great Britain (the common Wealth) is combined of 53 battle ready countries, also the European union is massive in power, even without Britain, Do you even understand the full power of the French Airforce? let alone all the other countries in the union, Also America's military is funded by the french and the Chinese, Your an idiot..EU is unstopable

  • @Archerfenris lol the British common wealth would destroy the US military,53 battle ready countries...Ouch, also Britain's navy is fuckin massive, imagine the rest of the common wealth combined, thats over a million war vessels, Oh yeah Britain still uses Battle ships and they KNOW how to use them, Also the Royal Airforce is MASSIVE, and very powerful, with supuriority fighters like the Eurofighter Typhoon, Also Britain is part of the EU u know how many eurofighters are in Europe? millions

  • @Archerfenris IF that fictional war took place. In the real world the US wastes a large protion of its GDP on the army when other coutries spend it on heathcare, education and better civil infrastructure.

  • @Ashitaka255 Not saying the U.S. will be the world's only superpower forever. That's impossible. All I'm saying is...we're not going anywhere anytime soon. And I'm also saying the U.S. will be the dominant and world's best military for...I don't even know, longer than my children or their children's children will live.

  • @Archerfenris Assuming you're right... so what? Its unlikely that America will ever need such an army in todays world, the only reason it exists is to please rednecks and the HUGE military contractors.

    Lets not argue over it, its the internet and we'll achieve nothing with a little youtube debate.

  • @Ashitaka255 too true it's pointless but I don't look for a good intellectual debate on youtube comments, it's just something that I can waste my time while I procrastinate on studying for finals. And please. The military has a purpose, ask those that lived in Poland during WWII, or ask my GF who was just a baby when Iraq invaded Kuwait (because she's kuwaiti...) Many times the military is misused. And then again the one time you need them YOU REALLY NEED THEM.

  • @Archerfenris America didn't give a fuck about Poland. Poland was invaded in 1939. When did America join the war? Stop inventing history to suit your opinions.

  • @kaizy1 and wow, about Poland you clearly didn't understand my comment. Although the U.S. did save France and England I never claimed we saved Poland. I was making a comment about the importance of having a strong military, something both Poland and Kuwait didn't have prior to the unprovoked aggression of their neighbors. With countries like Iran and North Korea you honestly think the days of aggression are over? lol.