@DevilMayhem666 yes her argument was basically that cars, airplanes, dog breeds, races, roads, trees, shoes, pants, youtube, internet doesnt exist because humans have labelled them. A very scholarly argument if i might say so
I heard "race is a social construct" 3 years ago,I'm 26 now. I'm not american,and that was told by a liberal/leftist whatever white american. I never was taught that race is not real...they teach it there because America is the "melting pot".I even had a book for children about anthropology when I was a kid,no one said to me it was "racist".American education gone downhill.
@culturalhonesty@culturalhonesty Sickle Cell Disorders can be find in people of Italian, Greek, and Arabs decent. The Irish are also prone to certain genetic diseases that other Euros can't get. Are they a different race? Also watch this: watch?v=A8RefZ1Hcvo
@DevilMayhem666 I'm certain that there are dormant genes in everyone, some people may have dormant genes for sickle cell. Does that all of a sudden mean that Trees are a social construct? Or Dog breeds? Humans? I would really have to take quite the leap out of the scientific realm to believe that with a hundred thousand years of distinctly different geographic evolution, the ONLY difference these groups could have, is SKIN PIGMENTATION... give me a break!!!!!
Regarding malpractice, he is referring to the psychologists, sociologists, and the anthropologists (social engineers). They are all guilty of malpractice so that they can make money of their socialistic Utopia of equality and such, and pro-homosexuality, anti-traditionalist agenda to create a deluded version of heavan(sp?) on earth; making people believe that is is good, and if they think otherwise-they are shamed and wronged, and it sometimes works on the "sensitive" ones...
It is absolutely INSANE that people have to explain these things to the race deniers. The reality is, there has been a successful campaign to subvert the educational system and feed the west with absolutely insane ideas that cannot be backed up with any logic/reason/facts. The zombie apocalypse is rea
look up Philip Emeagwali he was born in Akure, Nigeria and has an IQ of 190 he won Gordon Bell Prize, and is studying for a PHD guess what? he's black and 100 times smarter than you
No amount of evidence will ever change your mind , because your life is so pathetic that with out your "race" which you take to mean "ethnicity" you think you would be stupid. If you honesty believe this crap when the only people pushing it are out side the field and have been rejceted and debunked by actual anthropologists then your stupid no matter how pasty your skin. The human genome project has proven behond doubt that you are wrong.
In 1972 Richard Lewontin performed a FST statistical analysis using 17 markers including blood group proteins. His results were that the majority of genetic differences between humans, 85.4%, were found within a population, 8.3% of genetic differences were found between populations within a race, and only 6.3% was found to differentiate races which in the study were Caucasian, African, Mongoloid, South Asian Aborigines, Amerinds, Oceanians, and Australian Aborigines
@lxAgnosticxl The "race doesn't exist" myth is closely tied to the "Out of Africa" myth. Both will soon fall under the weight of scientific evidence, the races have different gene lines going back to around 2 million BC with Homo erectus. Europeans have Neanderthal genes.
@lxAgnosticxl At least five subspecies exist: European or white, sub-Saharan African or Negro, Mainland East Asian, Australo-Melanesian and American Indian:
All five groupings have historically differentiated in unique geographic locations.
All five groupings have unique natural histories.
The vast majority of individuals within any of these groupings can be easily distinguished from the vast majority of individuals in other groups by visual examination of physical appearance.
In 1972 Richard Lewontin performed a FST statistical analysis using 17 markers including blood group proteins. His results were that the majority of genetic differences between humans, 85.4%, were found within a population, 8.3% of genetic differences were found between populations within a race, and only 6.3% was found to differentiate races which in the study were Caucasian, African, Mongoloid, South Asian Aborigines, Amerinds, Oceanians, and Australian Aborigines
-lakewood425 All of these guys you list don't have degrees in biology or anthroplogy.
Craig venter (an actual biologist) "Race is a social concept. It's not a scientific one. There are no bright lines (that would stand out), if we could compare all the sequenced genomes of everyone on the planet. When we try to apply science to try to surt out these social differences, it all falls apart."
It is funny how many Western Scientists avoid the term race (far from all) whilst Eastern-European and Chinese scientists do not not. (Kazynski 2003) It is interesting how the Western Scientists are using the word Population or Ethnicity instead of race when talking about the 6-10+ human groupings that PERFECTLY match the old anthropological categories of race.
Can this have anything to do with political correctness that is rampant in the West but not the East? Ya think! ^^
What is a biological race or subspecies and how is it determined?
A biological race or subspecies of a species is a population that is distinguished from other biological races/subspecies of this species by the following criteria: * Each race has developed in a unique geographic location. Uniqueness does not imply non-shared environmental variables with the geographic location of other races. * Each race has a unique natural history.
* Members of a race share a set of phylogenetically concordant phenotypic characters. Phylogeny refers to evolutionary relationships; the more recent the last common ancestral population, the closer two populations are phylogenetically. The phenotype refers to physical appearance, behaviors and other manifestations of gene expression. *
There is recognizable phylogenetic partitioning between the races.
At least five subspecies exist among humans: European or white, sub-Saharan African or Negro, Mainland East Asian, Australo-Melanesian and Native American. Evidence supporting this notion:
* All five groupings have historically differentiated in unique geographic locations. * All five groupings have unique natural histories. * The vast majority of individuals within any of these groupings can be easily distinguished from the vast majority of individuals in other groupings by a) a visual examination of overall physical appearance; b) multiple, say 21-24, craniofacial inter-landmark distances;3)
c) 20 discrete cranial traits,4) etc. This is because members of a race share a set of phenotypic characters consistent with their evolutionary history. * There is recognizable phylogenetic partitioning between the five groupings in the form of overall physical appearance and also neutral genetic markers.5) * Concordant evidence for the classification of these five groupings as separate subspecies/races comes from genetic studies involving:
To anyone who takes this gut seriously you might like to know a few things
1st) he said you can tell race by looking at a skull or dna yet his own source refutes his claim (Risch, Niel J. et al. "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies.") couldn't find them using the word race once but they say in regards to the differences among people of different continents "Based on physical appearance this may be counterintuitive."
@lxAgnosticxl You can tell the race by looking at their skull. You can even tell the race by looking at their pelvis with 85-90% accuracy. Source: 1) Diane L France 2) M. Yasar Iscan 3) Brace CL You can tell race using DNA. You can tell by 100% accuracy. Look up Tony Frudakis. "Couldn't find them using race once" Here -> "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified RACE/Ethnicity" The racial language categories matched an underlying biology.
@lxAgnosticxl Most modern western scientists tend to replace the word "race" with "population" due to the political situation in western nations. So using the continent of origin is a good substitute. If you take two people one from Japan and one from Poland and put them next to each other in Australia you will be able to tell which is from where simply by their appearance.
No one denies physical characteristics ,you are talking of "race" in the strict sense of ethnicity, people evolved to live in different parts of the planet ethnicity is a usefull concept when trying to identify someone. This is not "race". Race is small changes in recent anscetry via natural selection to help them survive better in there enviorment ,And thats all race is. (see the comments I left below)
@lxAgnosticxl Ok then if you don't want to use the word race, then don't use it. Geneticists use the term "population" instead. It just so happens that these "populations" match up with the common perception of "race."
Anyhow you're right and I nor anyone else claims that races are clearly and totally diffident from one another and there is no overlap. In fact you will find that most hereditarians will point out that lines between races are quite blurry. cont...
This is just aload of crap, Only 1/10 0f 1% of our Dna comprises everything that makes us the individuals that we are.
In biology, races are distinct genetically divergent populations within the same species with relatively small morphological and genetic differences in recent ancestry.
Henry Harpending, member of national acadamy of science in the book 'The 10 000 Year Old Explosion', talks about how continental groups are diverging from eachother.
"Genes are evolving fast in Eur, Asia & Afr, but almost all of these are unique to their continent of origin. We are getting less alike, not merging into a single mixed humanity. Human races are evolving away from eachother"
The term "race", as they use it, implies more than geographic origins. It assumes similarities in temperament, skills, intelligence etc. There is NO scientific basis for this. Because it is a social construct. Since the mapping of the human Genome It's been very clear the genetic variations between people that belong to different races don't back up a geneticaly defined notion of "race". That is why they stoped using the word.
In the words of Craig venter (a well respectedd biologist) "Race is a social concept. It's not a scientific one. There are no bright lines (that would stand out), if we could compare all the sequenced genomes of everyone on the planet. When we try to apply science to try to surt out these social differences, it all falls apart."
@lxAgnosticxl ...We instead claim that while there are many similarities between people all over the world the populations are still distinct and distinguishable via simple observation and genetics and that these populations do differ. They differ in the obvious traits such as skin, hair, and eye color, averages in muscle structure, bone density, fat distribution, susceptibility and immunity to diseases, rates of twin births, gestation time, rates of development, and IQ. You can't ignore facts.
I'm not going to sit here and repeat my self. No one denies physical characteristics ,you are talking of "race" in the strict sense of ethnicity, people evolved to live in different parts of the planet.
Scientists don't use the word "race" because (Craig venter) "Race is a social concept. It's not a scientific one."
@lxAgnosticxl Ok then but that doesn't mean that it is not useful. It doesn't change the differences between the "races" or "populations" or whatever term you wish to use. Claiming the that "race is not a scientific concept" is simply playing semantics.
@lxAgnosticxl What seperates a European from African is not simply dark skin and Frizzy-nappy hair, behaviour and Intelligence come into play. There are some 2,000 yr old Aqudects in Europe which still provide European cities with water yet Africans need white people to fly out and build them wells. Africans will never be able to invent, achieve what white people have, and it's not because of their environment.
"What seperates a European from African is not simply dark skin and Frizzy-nappy hair, behaviour and Intelligence come into play."
I often hear this claim from Racists ..... I mean racial realists but never here a single source backing it up. I find it so sad that you think 'black' means 'African'. What world do you live in where you have achived something by an accident of birth where you have pasty skin?
@lxAgnosticxl Racist - Someone who understands and admits of racial differences.
Racism to me has no meaning if you try to exclude the genetic isolation aspects, genes and in addition to DNA programming the social constructionists don't want to adhere to any hint of DNA, such that our genetic predilections program behavior and create culture as per genetic memetics and such. They want to think they are so free of biological determinism, enough to try to silence the forces of DNA.
@lxAgnosticxl Who we're born, what race we're born are not accidents.
Multiculturalism is a anti-European hate-ideology designed to gradually annihilate our traditionally established values and unique ethnic identity. It's based on the fundamentally wrong assumption that races are equal, which is grotesquely ridiculous and runs counter to the historically established fact that it's White people who have accomplished the most important and sophisticated technological achievements.
@lxAgnosticxl And p.s., IQ differences have been proven a hundred times, by the likes of Dr. William Shockley, Philipe Rushton, Richard Lynn, Charles Murray, Non-Whites and Liberals just refuse to accept it.
1)J. Philippe Rushton a psychology professor has already been debunked by LORING BRACE he wrote a paper debunking his crap 'Review of Race, Evolution and Behavior by C. Loring Brace' Real anthropolgists don't like there work being shat upon by racists like Rushton (Con.)
This is the problem with people like you when you have an agenda that conflicts with the scientific consensus you'll either cry political correctness or consiprecy, just like a creationist it's pathetic it's not an argument it's a buzz word. Even with all this Theres still not link. You must have come to this videp thinking it would back up your racism yet you obviously didn't check the sources thay contradict what's in the video.
@lxAgnosticxl In studies of IQ in mixed races adolescents (White European Americans X African Americans) indicates that the mixed racial individuals had a mean IQ between the means of the two parental populations, it is lowered for the white group. This is as expected as talented ethnic groups such as the Icelanders, Japanese and the Jews (until recently) have abstained from interracial matings.
@lxAgnosticxl Read "Race, Evolution and Behaviour" or just look at the richard lynn global IQ charts. (blacks) have smaller brains than whites/asians,millions less neurons and less complex.Those who are qualified to comment on this issue generally range from 20-80% of IQ being genetic with an average a bit over half effect.
Two Races move in a different direction as they evolve, every race has adapted to the eviroment it's own way, Homogenity is always the end result.
@lxAgnosticxl "The genetic advancement of man arose as a result of on-going competition between genetically different, non-interbreeding hominid populations, and was sustained not merely by geographical isolation but also by developing bonds of co-operation and love within the kindred, and of suspicion, fear, antagonism, & even warfare against such alien groups as might become competitors for the territorial and material resources necessary to sustain life". - Johnothan McGregor
@lxAgnosticxl Ruston's work has never been debunked, I could say that the out of Africa theory has been debunked, the Neanderthals weren't from Africa and Europeans have Neanderthal DNA. Rushton's work is hated but Not wrong, and the "Bell Curve " by Charles Murray is very accurate and widely accepted.
Is it that hard to accept that Africans aren't as intelligent as others? really? Mudhuts until the 19th century, live on the most fertile land on the planet yet can't farm.
I listed 5 source that debunked Rushton , non of the people you site even work in this feild You are cherry picking the data, you still believe this crap? yet survays have shown no anthropolpgist accepts race as a valued taxa. You've been debunked by the human genome project!
Rushton is hated because he tkes the work of 19th centuary bigots who knew nothing about evolution to support his BS, you've obviously never read what he says or read what acctual biologist/ anthropologists think.
And it's so said you think race = skin colour and black=africain PATHETIC!!!
@lxAgnosticxl Of course Ruston is hated by people like you, Liberals, Egalitarians who are trying to create a twisted utopia of false racial equality and miscegenation. A world where race no longer exists and people are replaced by hybrid-mixed abominations. How far off am I?
You want facts ok, it's a fact that convolutions (wrinkles in brain) are linked to intelligence, and Africans have fewer convolutions. Black children are 15 x more likely to be born with an IQ of 50.
@lxAgnosticxl An anthropologist can identify the race of remains by studying the bones, or hair left behind. If there were no racial differences there would be no Anthropology. To think that lying about or ignoring racial differences is evolution is absurd, to think that miscegenation is evolution is insane, and to think Whites and Blacks have the same DNA, Bones is idiotic, nature does not do equal. We do not live in a we're one world we live in a survival of the fittest world.
Once agian you've displayed your dishonesty, The human genome project has shown behond any doubt we are all members of the same sub species, no matter what you look like or where you come from we all can interbreed we live connected proving we have very similar Dna, biologists say only 1/2 of 1% vary among individuals. That's whats in text books on biology.
And yet again you think being black means being African WTF is wrong with you?
@lxAgnosticxl Greig Vebture, the man who sequenced the Human Genome, wrote of more differences than similarities, as a matter of fact Greg venter was called a "nazi" by people like you for acknowledging racial differences. Craig Ventner and Luca Cavalli-Sforza lied and said that the Human Genome Project was race-free. They said they took DNA from all races and mixed it up. Later, Ventner admitted that the whole project was based on the DNA of just one man, Craig Ventner.
If we were not the same species we wouldn't be able to inter breed, we can we are the same species & the human genome project has already proven we are all the same sub species.
Wow it takes a real peace of shit to lie like you, the HGP was to sequence the genome not test the blood of each race you're a liar!!!
@lxAgnosticxl A polar bear and brown bear can itnerbreed, they're different species yet they are more similar than Europeans and Blacks.
It's not possible for Blacks to be in the same Sub-species as Europeans, a 5 yr old can tell the difference between a white man and a black man, if we were the same race this wouldn't be possible. A Mulatto is Not the same as a white person, the skin, hair, bones are different. The white race needs to stay White, not turn brown with Nappy hair.
Again there offspring is a hybrid, thats not what happens in humans, Whites & blacks don't interbreed with difficulty meaning there not seperating in an evolutionary context.
WOW again Black is NOT a race it's an ethicity, You clearly don't know what you're talking about. I'm not black but if your ethnicity is all that matters to you, you're a pathetic worthless cunt! Richard Lewontin has already debunked your claim.
He explained that earlier in the video. A dalmation can breed with a yorkie, a lion can breed with a jaguar. However, a lion is not a jaguar nor is a yorkie a dalmation. Just because a black man and a white woman can have a baby, doesn't mean there are no differences between the races. In fact, usually, the baby resembles the black parent. I have yet to see a mixed race person i thought was fully white, yet I've seen alot of mixed race people who look like soul brother (sister) #1
I'm not going to sit here and repeat myself again. Blacks and white breed together fine. All these animal examples are hybrids which is what happens when species split apart and that doesn't happen in humans so blacks and whites are NOT spilliting apart. The HGP has debunked this whole race crap a 1000 times!
If you understood the 1st thing about evolution you would know things go from the same species -> breeding with difficulty -> new species. Your example was a hybrid
(breeding with difficulty) we don't have that with race we breed just fine between races meaning we are the same.
Besides there is more variation within a race than between them.
So how would you explain physical and mental differences between the races? You can't get around it. There's no way to say racial differences are social constructs, anymore then you can say physical differences between the sexes are social constructs.That;s what it seems like you're trying to put forth, that everything is a social construct.
Back up your claim. What differences PROVE there are such differences. you can't ignore the facts or the science it has already buried your claim.
“Race is a social concept. NOT a scientific one. There are no bright lines (that would stand out), if we could compare all the sequenced genomes of everyone on the planet. When we try to apply science to try to surt out these social differences, it all falls apart."~ Craig venter
These claims are NOT accepted by those who work in th field.
@lxAgnosticxl Professor Luca Cavalli-Sforza of Stanford University was called a Nazi when he began his research on genetic race differences. So, he started saying that race is a myth. He wrote a huge book on the genetic differences between races and ethnic groups, HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY OF HUMAN GENES, & claimed that race doesn't exist. Anyone who reads the book can see that the entire book proves just the opposite.
@lxAgnosticxl We may be the same species, though I doubt it, but we are certainly not the same sub-species, a Negro is Nothing like a European.
A polar bear and Brown bear are considered seperate species yet they can interbreed, and interbreed is Not an improvement, it has been scientifically proven that a Mulatto is not as intelligent or healthy as a single race white.
Humans and Monkyes are more related than Europeans and Africans, there are more than 15% difference.
In the book 'The Ancestor's Tale' By Richard Dawking He makes it clear that race is obviously not a sub species he also says "Whatever we may think as observers of superficial appearences, the human species today is, to a geneticist, especiall uniform taking such genetic variation, as the human population does possess we can measure the fraction that is associated with the regional groupings that we call race. and it turns ot to be a small % of the total between 6-15 % much smaller...
...than in other species where races have been distinguished. Geneticists conclude, therefore that race IS NOT A VEY IMPORTANT ASPECT OF A PERSON. There are other ways to say this. If all humans were wiped out except for one local race, The great majority of the genetic variation in the human species would be preserved. This is not intuitively obvious and may be quite surprising to some people. If racial statements were as informative as most Victorians, e.g., used to think.........
you would surely need to preserve a good spread of all the different races in order to preserve most of the variation in the human species. Yet this is not the case."
Race is nothing more than your small changes in recent ancestry , To place any kind of emphasis on these superficial phenotypes or promoting a silly nationalistic ideology are not innocent or harmless.
Are blood has proven that no matter what you look like or where you come from we all decended from the same ancestors who were the blackity blackest Africans.
I just had to look up this "Professor Lewontin". To my, not so big surprise, I found what I was looking for. His religion. I've done this procedure a lot lately, and it almost never fails.
In 8 out of 10 cases their religion is the common key.
@paesanot Conspiracy theories. Are they? Are they really? I do it out of curiosity. These days I always look up the most opinionated people and their religion just to confirm if there might be anything to these, "old irrational paranoid" rumours.
If people bothered to look up facts themselves, instead of letting the media tell them what is fact and what is not, perhaps the world today would be a much much better place.
This isn't a bad video, but the presentation is a bit dated, certainly for a YouTube video. Now that you've updated the website, you ought to look into modernizing the presentation of these videos, too.
To begin to understand why this absurd obsession with diversity and race mixing has infected media and academia so perversely today, I suggest searching for videos by Dr. Kevin MacDonald. He's written several books, most notably "The Culture of Critique" which outlines the strategies, and execution of those strategies have been used to erode all Western society's from within.
You can also look up his book on Amazon to read the summary comments for a great educational primer.
Even semite makes no sense but I have to talk this way because of racetards like u who created these concepts in the first place. Sem-ite means the descendants of Sem (a biblical figure). Thats it, the 'race' who supposedly descended from one person in the bible lol. That's also where they got Hamites for africans because the bible said the descendants of Ham would be the servants of servants forever. This is how they justified slavery LOL fucking religion
I only used it because to u the idea that the ancient Persians thought Africans were the most handsome race on earth is offensive. Shows how insecure & hateful u are. I mean it's just an opinion. Get over it weirdo.
@DanKWynn Right,and that explains why people of all races succeed and fail in life.There are black billionaires,white homeless drug addicts and Asians that aren't small and smart, as well as vice versa.It has nothing to do with biology.
@fixdeluxe1 Black people are only billionairs in White countries. on Average Black people are infected with AIDs. Have an IQ of 70. Black people 300 yrs ago were living in Mudhuts, couldn't farm, were dying from Famine. Africa saw no progress until the Europeans came and built roads, homes, cars, and vaccines.
Biology has to do with everything. IQ, Skin, Heigth, Productivity.
My race is simplely Not the same as yours, in every way. We should stop fighting it and embrase it.
"Black people are only billionairs in White countries"
Whoops. Gold mining West African civilisations traded with Europeans who considered them their equal as early as the Renaissance. This led to the slave trade though. A population decline led to societal weakness. European colonisers saw this & took immediate advantage.
Egypt's 25th dynasty was black African.
Ethiopia was rich & powerful enough to successfully defend itself against colonialism against Italy.
@TheNarcMan There is no recorded history of Blacks operation and running any profitable organization other tan enslaving their fellow African counterparts and selling them as slaves to Arabs and Europeans.
Black people are not equal to Europeans, Physically, Genetically, Biologically, Historically. Nature does not do equal.
We're not the same, we must accept it and push forth for Homogenous civilizations.
@TheNarcMan Black Africans did not grow or make Coffee.
Europeans brought the horses to Africa when they colonized parts of it, Europeans brought the horses to America as well.
Those brown/copper skin people were most likely mulattoes, descendants of Egyptians and Nubians, and they did a horrible job running Egypt much like everyother civilization they try to control.
We're simplely not the same, go to Africa if you believe you can run a nation, we want our nations Homogenous.
Yeah they did. They also used coffee beans as counters in complex maths multiplications when calculating their trade. They used a cool short cut method of multiplication similar to how a computer multiplies.
"Europeans brought the horses to Africa"
Nope, Arab traders.
"Europeans brought the horses to America"
There was once native horses but yeah, modern horses were brought by whites.
"Those brown/copper skin people" ran Egypt from day 1
@TheNarcMan Since when were there coffee beans in Sub-saharan Africa. When you say Afircans do you mean black? because North Africa was populated mostly by whites/caucasians.
The black Africans weren't the ones who founded mathematics, the caucasian Africans are responsible for that.
The egyptians said there was nothing but savage cannibals in the sub-sahara.
And who do you think sold the horses to the Arabs? horses are from Europe buddy, not the middle east.
"Those brown/copper skin people were most likely mulattoes"
Half black/white are not copperish coloured they look like obama. Egyptians were middle eastern people. Not white. Not black. Semitic-ish.
"Nubians... did a horrible job running Egypt"
Black Pharaoh's ruled for more than 100 years bringing religious reform until Persians invaded. It wasn't a race/hate war though just business as a famous Persian quote said "they (black Kushites) are the most handsome race of men on earth".
@TheNarcMan The Egptians were certainly not semites. The semites (Jews) were who the Egyptians enslaved, semites were slaves in Egypt at some point. Also the DNA found in King Tutankhuman is not found amongst Middle eastern people but west European people.
Blacks handsome, lol, and I'm the one embarrassing myself.
I said semite-ish, meaning middle eastern people. Or did people take, uh let's say, 3 weeks to get from western Europe to Egypt & start an Empire? If they developed in the middle east for thousands of years then they're middle eastern lol. Im sick of stupid black & white cunts arguing over who Egyptians were. Afrocentric, Euroecentric cocksuckers.
"Blacks handsome"
A Persian proverb not mine. Take it up with the ancient Persians u bigot.
Lol ,u don't know shit about geo politics. Technically there are 'ethnicities' in every single war ever fought (even if between two groups from one ethnicity). So this would mean 100% of wars are ethnically caused if u put it that way. But then wars taditionally always been started & fought by men. So maybe it's 100% a gender issue. I know a lot of women would agree with that LOL. Read a fucking book bitch.
@TheNarcMan The Egptians were certainly not semites. The semites (Jews) were who the Egyptians enslaved, semites were slaves in Egypt at some point. Also the DNA found in King Tutankhuman is not found amongst Middle eastern people but west European people.
Blacks handsome, lol, and I'm the one embarrassing myself.
If you think I'm African then we may not be as different as you'd like to hope. I might visit Africa one day but my recent ancestors aren't from there so it'll probably just remain a visit.
"if you believe you can run a nation"
Yeah coz the economics & government policies of Europeans & white westerners are really working out right now huh. Don't forget all those big wars & depressions we like too, LOL.
@lakewood425 That is why I have met a super chess champion from Ghana,and why there are many scholars of african descent in university.Accept that the situation and political/social history is to blame rather than biology.
@TheNarcMan The Original and longest lasting Egyptian Empires were Caucasian. Egypt didn't turn Black until later into their last years, and it was after the Egyptians made the horrible mistake of enslaving Nubians, letting them into their civilizations, Breeding with them, and letting them takeover. Once the blacks took over Egypt, it fell.
Hopefully Americans and Europeans wont make the same mistake.
" it was after the Egyptians made the horrible mistake of enslaving Nubians, letting them into their civilizations, Breeding with them, and letting them takeover"
Wrong. The Kushites (already a black Empire in their own right) pushed north & successfully invaded.
"Ethiopia had a White population 3,000 yrs ago"
Lol.
"Research some non-PC history"
But I don't have laptop. Jokes. You're a mouth breather.
@lakewood425 "on Average Black people are infected with AIDs" Lol. "Have an IQ of 70" Also lol. "Black people 300 yrs ago were living in Mudhuts" All of them? Shit. Someone give this guy a phd so he can rewrite the history books. "couldn't farm" Wrong. "were dying from Famine" Wrong. "Africa saw no progress until the Europeans came and..." Fought for a couple hundred years against these "primitive monkeys" even though whites are genetically stronger & smarter. Hmm.
@lakewood425 No,there are Black Billionaires in Africa.Many African states had stable and advanced political systems(i.e the Zulus) and are also heavily influenced by Arab and Semitic culture.European colonialism,combined with their destructive imports of alcohol,tobacco,firearms and culture turned Africa into what it is today,not Biology.Politics my friend,not science.
And you are assuming I am black,when I am a mix of mongloid and caucasian and have no negroid blood whatsoever?
@fixdeluxe1 NO. Colonialism has NOTHING to do with the situation of Africa. Check out the video "Milton Friedman on Slavery and Colonization" here on youtube. Friedman explains that "it's not true that the wealth of the west derives from exploiting the colonies (...) THE WHEEL had not been invented in parts of Africa until the end of the 19th century (...) The average condition of life in Africa have grown enormously as a result of their contanct with the west".
@fixdeluxe1 So stop blaming european people for problems they are not responsible for, and ask yourself: "why black africans were not even able to invent the wheel?"
@fixdeluxe1 The black Billionaires in Africa made their $ off of slavery, and conflict diamonds, hardly a intelligent and moral career choice. Julius Malema is rich, and I can assure you he is no hard worker or swell guy, he's as crooked as the rest of the black elite.
The Zulus completely wiped out other African tribes (Hotintots), and have a long history in theft and slavery.
You're not being honest about colonization, many African states (Zimbabwe, SA) benefited from it.
"black Billionaires in Africa made their $ off of slavery, and conflict diamonds, hardly a intelligent and moral career choice"
Like I said, western big business is so pure huh? Sweat shops all over the earth. Oil spills all over the earth. The Amazon being raped & polluted underneath the natives' feet. Somalia's fish stocks depleted & water polluted. Climate change from cO2 emissions. Australias coral reefs bleached, forests destroyed, topsoil compacted by western farm animals.
@lakewood425 South Africa turned into a repressive,racist third world oligarchy that is now rampant with crime and discord,and Zimbabwe is a shitty tin-pot dictatorship thanks to colonialism.
You are saying that you have intimate knowledge of African billionaires?
@fixdeluxe1 Before Europeans arrived in Africa the Africans were living in mudhuts, on the verge of extinction from disease, famine, and warfare. They had no civilization and you're giving them more credit than they've earned.
A Mongrel is not white, and not to be accepted into white soceity. We don't want multicultralism, and Heterogenous civilizations wether the non-Whites are super intelligent or thugs, we want racial acknowledgemnt and seperation.
@lakewood425 You are starting to sound like a real narcissistic fool.I'm mostly white and have encountered black university professors,as well as white and Asian.My point is that intelligence,it's an individual trait,rather than a racial trait.Whites are not superior biologically,but simply had access to resources,information and had significant geo-political advantages which super-sped their development.But there are other great cultures not centered in Europe.
I don't know where these racists get off calling these kinds of facts 'liberal propaganda'. If it was I might have been taught it in school! In Australia in the 90's we were fed colonial pro-monarchy propaganda & told that the convicts sent to Australia were 'actually heroes that didn't really do anything wrong'.
@fixdeluxe1 There's no such thing as mostly white, you're either White or not, Asian or not. Unless you are white you are not white, people need to stick with a person of their own ethnicity no matter how much they think they are a member of a certain other race.
An education can help someone reach his mental IQ ability, but not surpass it. Also, bare in mind that blacks are educated by whites in European style schools, while whites educate themselves and have always done so.
@lakewood425 That is one of the most stupid things I have ever heard.You are just going to have to grow up and learn to live with mutli-racial people who DO EXIST IN THIS WORLD.I am a prime example,one of my parents is white and the other is of half pacific islander,half european decent.That makes me multi-racial.That is impossible to dispute.You are an idiot.
@fixdeluxe1 Multi-racial is Not white. We do not want to make more multi-racial people, we want to continue the "White" race. To think that a half white person is white, or can reprenst the white race, or is just as good as a full blooded white person is insane, and absurd. The white race needs to continue not become mongrelized and replaces by other racial groups in their own nations. If this is too hard for you to contemplate than I simplely will not take the time to explain.
@lakewood425 A half-White half-Japanese (for example) might actually be BETTER in some regards than a full White, because he has an IQ of 102.5 to revert to, rather than one of merely 100.
@nykos222 Better can mean anything anybody wants it to mean, as a White man who wants his race to continue a half-White person isn't better, race-mixing could be the cure for cancer and away to keep the sun from burning out it still doesn't produce single race offspring, it doesn't continue my race.
a 2 point higher IQ isn't really a good enough reason to forever kill off one's race now is it? miscegenation is irreversible, once done it can never be undone, so we must think carefully.
@fixdeluxe1 IQ has already been proven to be racially linked, Whites have a average IQ of 100, blacks have an average IQ of 70. This means that most of the worlds whites consistently have an IQ of 100. An induvivual can try to improve his Genetical IQ, but he can Not surpass it. A black man born with an IQ of 70 no matter how much he studies will never reach a 100 IQ. It's not genetically possible.
Whites not being superior to other races is your opinion, not a fact of life.
@fixdeluxe1 Whites in Europe for hundreds of Thousands of yrs were traped under Hundreds of feet of snow, killer winds, scarce food & shelter. While Africans were warm, & lived in the most fertile land on the planet.
Blacks didn't have to develope a high intelligence to survive in Africa. Whites did in order to survive in Europe. Whites evolved in an environment were thinking & strategy was key for survival.
@fixdeluxe1 Racism and xenophobia are natural. What is unnatural is living amongst groups that are not the same as oneself. Homogeneous communities are healtheir, nicer, safer.
a few Black people with a 100 IQ doesn't change the genetical IQ of 70.
the "out of Africa" theory has never been proven, and just becuase we all may come from the same place doesn't mean we're the same and should live amongst one another or breed with one another.
@fixdeluxe1 I don't have to learn to live with anything, the world though multiracial does not mean our nations have to be, people should live around and breed with their own racial group. If you want to live in a multiracial nation, with miscegenation move to Brazil, stop trying to force those racial harming ideologies into our homogenous socieities, they're unwanted.
@fixdeluxe1 Non-Africans have 3% Neanderthal admixture which Africans don't have. We DON'T all come from the same species, but have additional (if small) genetic contributions from other archaic human species.
@BrokenTengu99 We'll see. I already see Multicultralism failing. Racial seperation is the future. Embrase it.
Black people have an IQ of 70, a Physical apperace similar to a Gorilla, Genetics that are ultimately usless in the modern world, and lived in Mudhuts until the 18th century. What could possibly be gained from such a retarded Gene pool?
White women will be impregnated with inferiour ape like children, and abandoned by the dad.
@lakewood425 " We'll see. " And STILL you keep saying this . " I already see Multicultralism failing. ' You see what you WANT to see . Not " what is " . " Black people have an IQ of 70 " Funny , I'm black and have an IQ of 130 . Try again . " a Physical apperace similar to a Gorilla " Q : And what color is a chimp that's shaved ? A: White . Try again . " Genetics that are ultimately usless in the modern world " Apparently , my Genetics surpas yours .
@AngelofJustize Mike Tyson was fighting for plenty of years while Wladimir was fighting. So your point is irrelevant. Not only that, but looking at the record between the two of them shows that Wladimir has a better record.
EVERYONE WHO HAS A FACEBOOK PLEASE LOGIN TO RT AMERICA (RT TV) WHERE THE RACE DENIERS ARE CLAIMING THAT RACIALLY AWARE WHITES ARE INNATELY MENTALLY DEFICIENT, CITING "SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE" FROM A HUFFINGTON POST ARTICLE PERTAINING TO CHILDHOOD "IQ STATISTICS" WHICH PREDICT QUOTE-UNQUOTE "RACISM" IN LATER LIFE AND REFUTE THEM!
Quote: "Next time you call group of right-wing racists a bunch of idiots, you can back yourself up with one simple word: Science!"
@AngelofJustize Joe Forman cheated. Mike Tyson can barely speak correct english. And Muhammed Ali Opposed Race-mixing.
"We're the best runners too." - I know, I see it all the time on Cops.
"skin that looks like uncooked hotdog?"- As opposed to Nappy ape like hair, and dark skin that contracts every Tropical disease?
"So why is it that you guys lie on the beach to get a tan and try to look like us" - Why do black people speak European languages, and live in white nations?
@culturalhonesty You clearly didn't watch the vid or couldn't comprehend what she was saying.
DevilMayhem666 6 days ago
@lakewood425 And why is that? Sounds like someone wants to get raped again.
DevilMayhem666 1 week ago
@culturalhonesty Dog breeds are a social construct and did you watch the vid? Also watch this watch?v=w7eW27m9bio.
DevilMayhem666 1 week ago
@DevilMayhem666 yes her argument was basically that cars, airplanes, dog breeds, races, roads, trees, shoes, pants, youtube, internet doesnt exist because humans have labelled them. A very scholarly argument if i might say so
culturalhonesty 6 days ago
I heard "race is a social construct" 3 years ago,I'm 26 now. I'm not american,and that was told by a liberal/leftist whatever white american. I never was taught that race is not real...they teach it there because America is the "melting pot".I even had a book for children about anthropology when I was a kid,no one said to me it was "racist".American education gone downhill.
WildBerserker1 1 week ago
People need to stick with their own race.
lakewood425 1 week ago
@culturalhonesty @culturalhonesty Sickle Cell Disorders can be find in people of Italian, Greek, and Arabs decent. The Irish are also prone to certain genetic diseases that other Euros can't get. Are they a different race? Also watch this: watch?v=A8RefZ1Hcvo
DevilMayhem666 2 weeks ago
@DevilMayhem666 I'm certain that there are dormant genes in everyone, some people may have dormant genes for sickle cell. Does that all of a sudden mean that Trees are a social construct? Or Dog breeds? Humans? I would really have to take quite the leap out of the scientific realm to believe that with a hundred thousand years of distinctly different geographic evolution, the ONLY difference these groups could have, is SKIN PIGMENTATION... give me a break!!!!!
culturalhonesty 1 week ago
Italians, Greeks, and Arabs can get Sickle Cell.
DevilMayhem666 2 weeks ago
Shouldnt they be committed for that malpractice? Brainwash, brainwash, brainwash.
j19527 2 weeks ago
Regarding malpractice, he is referring to the psychologists, sociologists, and the anthropologists (social engineers). They are all guilty of malpractice so that they can make money of their socialistic Utopia of equality and such, and pro-homosexuality, anti-traditionalist agenda to create a deluded version of heavan(sp?) on earth; making people believe that is is good, and if they think otherwise-they are shamed and wronged, and it sometimes works on the "sensitive" ones...
j19527 2 weeks ago
This guy loves zionist jews.
LearningAsIGo80 2 weeks ago
It is absolutely INSANE that people have to explain these things to the race deniers. The reality is, there has been a successful campaign to subvert the educational system and feed the west with absolutely insane ideas that cannot be backed up with any logic/reason/facts. The zombie apocalypse is rea
culturalhonesty 2 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
Keep up the Good work Mr. Taylor, don't let any of these Antis get you down, their world is colapsing and they can't stand it.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago 4
look up Philip Emeagwali he was born in Akure, Nigeria and has an IQ of 190 he won Gordon Bell Prize, and is studying for a PHD guess what? he's black and 100 times smarter than you
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
lakewood425-
No amount of evidence will ever change your mind , because your life is so pathetic that with out your "race" which you take to mean "ethnicity" you think you would be stupid. If you honesty believe this crap when the only people pushing it are out side the field and have been rejceted and debunked by actual anthropologists then your stupid no matter how pasty your skin. The human genome project has proven behond doubt that you are wrong.
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
In 1972 Richard Lewontin performed a FST statistical analysis using 17 markers including blood group proteins. His results were that the majority of genetic differences between humans, 85.4%, were found within a population, 8.3% of genetic differences were found between populations within a race, and only 6.3% was found to differentiate races which in the study were Caucasian, African, Mongoloid, South Asian Aborigines, Amerinds, Oceanians, and Australian Aborigines
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl The "race doesn't exist" myth is closely tied to the "Out of Africa" myth. Both will soon fall under the weight of scientific evidence, the races have different gene lines going back to around 2 million BC with Homo erectus. Europeans have Neanderthal genes.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl At least five subspecies exist: European or white, sub-Saharan African or Negro, Mainland East Asian, Australo-Melanesian and American Indian:
All five groupings have historically differentiated in unique geographic locations.
All five groupings have unique natural histories.
The vast majority of individuals within any of these groupings can be easily distinguished from the vast majority of individuals in other groups by visual examination of physical appearance.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FAIL!!
In 1972 Richard Lewontin performed a FST statistical analysis using 17 markers including blood group proteins. His results were that the majority of genetic differences between humans, 85.4%, were found within a population, 8.3% of genetic differences were found between populations within a race, and only 6.3% was found to differentiate races which in the study were Caucasian, African, Mongoloid, South Asian Aborigines, Amerinds, Oceanians, and Australian Aborigines
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
lakewood425-
"anthropologist can identify the race of remains by studying the bones, or hair left behind."
How gullible are you? even the sources in the video dispute your claim
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
-lakewood425 All of these guys you list don't have degrees in biology or anthroplogy.
Craig venter (an actual biologist) "Race is a social concept. It's not a scientific one. There are no bright lines (that would stand out), if we could compare all the sequenced genomes of everyone on the planet. When we try to apply science to try to surt out these social differences, it all falls apart."
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is funny how many Western Scientists avoid the term race (far from all) whilst Eastern-European and Chinese scientists do not not. (Kazynski 2003) It is interesting how the Western Scientists are using the word Population or Ethnicity instead of race when talking about the 6-10+ human groupings that PERFECTLY match the old anthropological categories of race.
Can this have anything to do with political correctness that is rampant in the West but not the East? Ya think! ^^
MrHerrIQi3 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
MrHerrIQi3 3 weeks ago
What is a biological race or subspecies and how is it determined?
A biological race or subspecies of a species is a population that is distinguished from other biological races/subspecies of this species by the following criteria: * Each race has developed in a unique geographic location. Uniqueness does not imply non-shared environmental variables with the geographic location of other races. * Each race has a unique natural history.
MrHerrIQi3 3 weeks ago
* Members of a race share a set of phylogenetically concordant phenotypic characters. Phylogeny refers to evolutionary relationships; the more recent the last common ancestral population, the closer two populations are phylogenetically. The phenotype refers to physical appearance, behaviors and other manifestations of gene expression. *
There is recognizable phylogenetic partitioning between the races.
MrHerrIQi3 3 weeks ago
* Evidence for phylogenetic distinction must normally come from the concordant distributions of multiple, independent genetically-based traits.
The above criteria are the standard phylogeographic criteria for race or subspecies assignment.
MrHerrIQi3 3 weeks ago
How many races or subspecies exist among humans?
At least five subspecies exist among humans: European or white, sub-Saharan African or Negro, Mainland East Asian, Australo-Melanesian and Native American. Evidence supporting this notion:
MrHerrIQi3 3 weeks ago
* All five groupings have historically differentiated in unique geographic locations. * All five groupings have unique natural histories. * The vast majority of individuals within any of these groupings can be easily distinguished from the vast majority of individuals in other groupings by a) a visual examination of overall physical appearance; b) multiple, say 21-24, craniofacial inter-landmark distances;3)
MrHerrIQi3 3 weeks ago
c) 20 discrete cranial traits,4) etc. This is because members of a race share a set of phenotypic characters consistent with their evolutionary history. * There is recognizable phylogenetic partitioning between the five groupings in the form of overall physical appearance and also neutral genetic markers.5) * Concordant evidence for the classification of these five groupings as separate subspecies/races comes from genetic studies involving:
MrHerrIQi3 3 weeks ago
To anyone who takes this gut seriously you might like to know a few things
1st) he said you can tell race by looking at a skull or dna yet his own source refutes his claim (Risch, Niel J. et al. "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies.") couldn't find them using the word race once but they say in regards to the differences among people of different continents "Based on physical appearance this may be counterintuitive."
lxAgnosticxl 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
MrHerrIQi3 3 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl Most modern western scientists tend to replace the word "race" with "population" due to the political situation in western nations. So using the continent of origin is a good substitute. If you take two people one from Japan and one from Poland and put them next to each other in Australia you will be able to tell which is from where simply by their appearance.
kubaniski 3 weeks ago 6
No one denies physical characteristics ,you are talking of "race" in the strict sense of ethnicity, people evolved to live in different parts of the planet ethnicity is a usefull concept when trying to identify someone. This is not "race". Race is small changes in recent anscetry via natural selection to help them survive better in there enviorment ,And thats all race is. (see the comments I left below)
lxAgnosticxl 3 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl Ok then if you don't want to use the word race, then don't use it. Geneticists use the term "population" instead. It just so happens that these "populations" match up with the common perception of "race."
Anyhow you're right and I nor anyone else claims that races are clearly and totally diffident from one another and there is no overlap. In fact you will find that most hereditarians will point out that lines between races are quite blurry. cont...
kubaniski 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
-C. Loring Brace, Dept of Anthropology, University of Michigan
- American anthropological Association
-George Armelagos, Professor, Dept of Anthropology, University of Colorado
-The Human Genome Project
-American Association of Physical Anthropologists
have all stated that the concept of race has little to no bases in the realm of taxonomy, genetics and human classification.
You can't determin someones race from dna what aload of crap.
lxAgnosticxl 3 weeks ago
This is just aload of crap, Only 1/10 0f 1% of our Dna comprises everything that makes us the individuals that we are.
In biology, races are distinct genetically divergent populations within the same species with relatively small morphological and genetic differences in recent ancestry.
lxAgnosticxl 3 weeks ago
@lxAgnostic
No, races are not distinct.
Species are distinct.
In Zoology, race, are fuzzy sets.
Henry Harpending, member of national acadamy of science in the book 'The 10 000 Year Old Explosion', talks about how continental groups are diverging from eachother.
"Genes are evolving fast in Eur, Asia & Afr, but almost all of these are unique to their continent of origin. We are getting less alike, not merging into a single mixed humanity. Human races are evolving away from eachother"
MrHerrIQi3 3 weeks ago
The term "race", as they use it, implies more than geographic origins. It assumes similarities in temperament, skills, intelligence etc. There is NO scientific basis for this. Because it is a social construct. Since the mapping of the human Genome It's been very clear the genetic variations between people that belong to different races don't back up a geneticaly defined notion of "race". That is why they stoped using the word.
lxAgnosticxl 3 weeks ago
In the words of Craig venter (a well respectedd biologist) "Race is a social concept. It's not a scientific one. There are no bright lines (that would stand out), if we could compare all the sequenced genomes of everyone on the planet. When we try to apply science to try to surt out these social differences, it all falls apart."
lxAgnosticxl 3 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl ...We instead claim that while there are many similarities between people all over the world the populations are still distinct and distinguishable via simple observation and genetics and that these populations do differ. They differ in the obvious traits such as skin, hair, and eye color, averages in muscle structure, bone density, fat distribution, susceptibility and immunity to diseases, rates of twin births, gestation time, rates of development, and IQ. You can't ignore facts.
kubaniski 3 weeks ago
I'm not going to sit here and repeat my self. No one denies physical characteristics ,you are talking of "race" in the strict sense of ethnicity, people evolved to live in different parts of the planet.
Scientists don't use the word "race" because (Craig venter) "Race is a social concept. It's not a scientific one."
lxAgnosticxl 3 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl Ok then but that doesn't mean that it is not useful. It doesn't change the differences between the "races" or "populations" or whatever term you wish to use. Claiming the that "race is not a scientific concept" is simply playing semantics.
kubaniski 3 weeks ago
You can push this said & pathetic racism all you like but you've already been debunked decades ago by anthropologists and biologists.
lxAgnosticxl 3 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl What seperates a European from African is not simply dark skin and Frizzy-nappy hair, behaviour and Intelligence come into play. There are some 2,000 yr old Aqudects in Europe which still provide European cities with water yet Africans need white people to fly out and build them wells. Africans will never be able to invent, achieve what white people have, and it's not because of their environment.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
@lakewood425
"What seperates a European from African is not simply dark skin and Frizzy-nappy hair, behaviour and Intelligence come into play."
I often hear this claim from Racists ..... I mean racial realists but never here a single source backing it up. I find it so sad that you think 'black' means 'African'. What world do you live in where you have achived something by an accident of birth where you have pasty skin?
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lxAgnosticxl Racist - Someone who understands and admits of racial differences.
Racism to me has no meaning if you try to exclude the genetic isolation aspects, genes and in addition to DNA programming the social constructionists don't want to adhere to any hint of DNA, such that our genetic predilections program behavior and create culture as per genetic memetics and such. They want to think they are so free of biological determinism, enough to try to silence the forces of DNA.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lxAgnosticxl Who we're born, what race we're born are not accidents.
Multiculturalism is a anti-European hate-ideology designed to gradually annihilate our traditionally established values and unique ethnic identity. It's based on the fundamentally wrong assumption that races are equal, which is grotesquely ridiculous and runs counter to the historically established fact that it's White people who have accomplished the most important and sophisticated technological achievements.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl And p.s., IQ differences have been proven a hundred times, by the likes of Dr. William Shockley, Philipe Rushton, Richard Lynn, Charles Murray, Non-Whites and Liberals just refuse to accept it.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
@lakewood425
*Points & laughs*
This is gonna take me some time.
1)J. Philippe Rushton a psychology professor has already been debunked by LORING BRACE he wrote a paper debunking his crap 'Review of Race, Evolution and Behavior by C. Loring Brace' Real anthropolgists don't like there work being shat upon by racists like Rushton (Con.)
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
This is the problem with people like you when you have an agenda that conflicts with the scientific consensus you'll either cry political correctness or consiprecy, just like a creationist it's pathetic it's not an argument it's a buzz word. Even with all this Theres still not link. You must have come to this videp thinking it would back up your racism yet you obviously didn't check the sources thay contradict what's in the video.
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl In studies of IQ in mixed races adolescents (White European Americans X African Americans) indicates that the mixed racial individuals had a mean IQ between the means of the two parental populations, it is lowered for the white group. This is as expected as talented ethnic groups such as the Icelanders, Japanese and the Jews (until recently) have abstained from interracial matings.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
@lakewood425
Is there any link supporting this?
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lxAgnosticxl Read "Race, Evolution and Behaviour" or just look at the richard lynn global IQ charts. (blacks) have smaller brains than whites/asians,millions less neurons and less complex.Those who are qualified to comment on this issue generally range from 20-80% of IQ being genetic with an average a bit over half effect.
Two Races move in a different direction as they evolve, every race has adapted to the eviroment it's own way, Homogenity is always the end result.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl "The genetic advancement of man arose as a result of on-going competition between genetically different, non-interbreeding hominid populations, and was sustained not merely by geographical isolation but also by developing bonds of co-operation and love within the kindred, and of suspicion, fear, antagonism, & even warfare against such alien groups as might become competitors for the territorial and material resources necessary to sustain life". - Johnothan McGregor
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl Ruston's work has never been debunked, I could say that the out of Africa theory has been debunked, the Neanderthals weren't from Africa and Europeans have Neanderthal DNA. Rushton's work is hated but Not wrong, and the "Bell Curve " by Charles Murray is very accurate and widely accepted.
Is it that hard to accept that Africans aren't as intelligent as others? really? Mudhuts until the 19th century, live on the most fertile land on the planet yet can't farm.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
@lakewood425
I listed 5 source that debunked Rushton , non of the people you site even work in this feild You are cherry picking the data, you still believe this crap? yet survays have shown no anthropolpgist accepts race as a valued taxa. You've been debunked by the human genome project!
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
@lakewood425
Rushton is hated because he tkes the work of 19th centuary bigots who knew nothing about evolution to support his BS, you've obviously never read what he says or read what acctual biologist/ anthropologists think.
And it's so said you think race = skin colour and black=africain PATHETIC!!!
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl Of course Ruston is hated by people like you, Liberals, Egalitarians who are trying to create a twisted utopia of false racial equality and miscegenation. A world where race no longer exists and people are replaced by hybrid-mixed abominations. How far off am I?
You want facts ok, it's a fact that convolutions (wrinkles in brain) are linked to intelligence, and Africans have fewer convolutions. Black children are 15 x more likely to be born with an IQ of 50.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
@lakewood425
1)Rushton has no degree in this area.
2)those that do have rejected and debunked him (see; 'Review of Race, Evolution and Behavior by C. Loring Brace')
3)he uses the work of 19th centuary scientists people who had no idea what Dna or evolution was.
The fact you would site him as a source displays your dishonesty and desperation
Again where are you getting this from? compared to what you've already told me I'm sure has hell not taking your word for it.
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl An anthropologist can identify the race of remains by studying the bones, or hair left behind. If there were no racial differences there would be no Anthropology. To think that lying about or ignoring racial differences is evolution is absurd, to think that miscegenation is evolution is insane, and to think Whites and Blacks have the same DNA, Bones is idiotic, nature does not do equal. We do not live in a we're one world we live in a survival of the fittest world.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
@lakewood425
Once agian you've displayed your dishonesty, The human genome project has shown behond any doubt we are all members of the same sub species, no matter what you look like or where you come from we all can interbreed we live connected proving we have very similar Dna, biologists say only 1/2 of 1% vary among individuals. That's whats in text books on biology.
And yet again you think being black means being African WTF is wrong with you?
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl Greig Vebture, the man who sequenced the Human Genome, wrote of more differences than similarities, as a matter of fact Greg venter was called a "nazi" by people like you for acknowledging racial differences. Craig Ventner and Luca Cavalli-Sforza lied and said that the Human Genome Project was race-free. They said they took DNA from all races and mixed it up. Later, Ventner admitted that the whole project was based on the DNA of just one man, Craig Ventner.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
@lakewood425
If we were not the same species we wouldn't be able to inter breed, we can we are the same species & the human genome project has already proven we are all the same sub species.
Wow it takes a real peace of shit to lie like you, the HGP was to sequence the genome not test the blood of each race you're a liar!!!
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl A polar bear and brown bear can itnerbreed, they're different species yet they are more similar than Europeans and Blacks.
It's not possible for Blacks to be in the same Sub-species as Europeans, a 5 yr old can tell the difference between a white man and a black man, if we were the same race this wouldn't be possible. A Mulatto is Not the same as a white person, the skin, hair, bones are different. The white race needs to stay White, not turn brown with Nappy hair.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
@lakewood425
Again there offspring is a hybrid, thats not what happens in humans, Whites & blacks don't interbreed with difficulty meaning there not seperating in an evolutionary context.
WOW again Black is NOT a race it's an ethicity, You clearly don't know what you're talking about. I'm not black but if your ethnicity is all that matters to you, you're a pathetic worthless cunt! Richard Lewontin has already debunked your claim.
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl Right on!
AHundredEyes 1 week ago
@lxAgnosticxl
He explained that earlier in the video. A dalmation can breed with a yorkie, a lion can breed with a jaguar. However, a lion is not a jaguar nor is a yorkie a dalmation. Just because a black man and a white woman can have a baby, doesn't mean there are no differences between the races. In fact, usually, the baby resembles the black parent. I have yet to see a mixed race person i thought was fully white, yet I've seen alot of mixed race people who look like soul brother (sister) #1
clip11 2 days ago
@clip11
I'm not going to sit here and repeat myself again. Blacks and white breed together fine. All these animal examples are hybrids which is what happens when species split apart and that doesn't happen in humans so blacks and whites are NOT spilliting apart. The HGP has debunked this whole race crap a 1000 times!
lxAgnosticxl 1 day ago
@lxAgnosticxl
What are you saying then? That because two races can interbreed, there's no such thing as race? You don't make sense.
clip11 1 day ago
@clip11
If you understood the 1st thing about evolution you would know things go from the same species -> breeding with difficulty -> new species. Your example was a hybrid
(breeding with difficulty) we don't have that with race we breed just fine between races meaning we are the same.
Besides there is more variation within a race than between them.
lxAgnosticxl 1 day ago
@lxAgnosticxl
So how would you explain physical and mental differences between the races? You can't get around it. There's no way to say racial differences are social constructs, anymore then you can say physical differences between the sexes are social constructs.That;s what it seems like you're trying to put forth, that everything is a social construct.
clip11 1 day ago
Back up your claim. What differences PROVE there are such differences. you can't ignore the facts or the science it has already buried your claim.
“Race is a social concept. NOT a scientific one. There are no bright lines (that would stand out), if we could compare all the sequenced genomes of everyone on the planet. When we try to apply science to try to surt out these social differences, it all falls apart."~ Craig venter
These claims are NOT accepted by those who work in th field.
lxAgnosticxl 16 hours ago
@lxAgnosticxl Professor Luca Cavalli-Sforza of Stanford University was called a Nazi when he began his research on genetic race differences. So, he started saying that race is a myth. He wrote a huge book on the genetic differences between races and ethnic groups, HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY OF HUMAN GENES, & claimed that race doesn't exist. Anyone who reads the book can see that the entire book proves just the opposite.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
@lxAgnosticxl We may be the same species, though I doubt it, but we are certainly not the same sub-species, a Negro is Nothing like a European.
A polar bear and Brown bear are considered seperate species yet they can interbreed, and interbreed is Not an improvement, it has been scientifically proven that a Mulatto is not as intelligent or healthy as a single race white.
Humans and Monkyes are more related than Europeans and Africans, there are more than 15% difference.
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lakewood425
Brown bears and polar bears offspring are hybrid, yet as Dawkins in his book in one single race most if not all dna is preserved
"Humans and Monkyes are more related than Europeans and Africans, there are more than 15% difference."
BULL SHIT!!!!!!
We can breed with black people you fucking moron!!!
Philip Emeagwali he was born in Akure, Nigeria and has an IQ of 190 Beat that!! in an IQ test
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Infact these lot have all written papers refuting his crap
-C. Loring Brace, Dept of Anthropology, University of Michigan
- American anthropological Association
-George Armelagos, Professor, Dept of Anthropology, University of Colorado
-The Human Genome Project
-American Association of Physical Anthropologists
lxAgnosticxl 2 weeks ago
In the book 'The Ancestor's Tale' By Richard Dawking He makes it clear that race is obviously not a sub species he also says "Whatever we may think as observers of superficial appearences, the human species today is, to a geneticist, especiall uniform taking such genetic variation, as the human population does possess we can measure the fraction that is associated with the regional groupings that we call race. and it turns ot to be a small % of the total between 6-15 % much smaller...
lxAgnosticxl 3 weeks ago
...than in other species where races have been distinguished. Geneticists conclude, therefore that race IS NOT A VEY IMPORTANT ASPECT OF A PERSON. There are other ways to say this. If all humans were wiped out except for one local race, The great majority of the genetic variation in the human species would be preserved. This is not intuitively obvious and may be quite surprising to some people. If racial statements were as informative as most Victorians, e.g., used to think.........
lxAgnosticxl 3 weeks ago
you would surely need to preserve a good spread of all the different races in order to preserve most of the variation in the human species. Yet this is not the case."
lxAgnosticxl 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrHerrIQi3
Race is nothing more than your small changes in recent ancestry , To place any kind of emphasis on these superficial phenotypes or promoting a silly nationalistic ideology are not innocent or harmless.
Are blood has proven that no matter what you look like or where you come from we all decended from the same ancestors who were the blackity blackest Africans.
lxAgnosticxl 3 weeks ago
I just had to look up this "Professor Lewontin". To my, not so big surprise, I found what I was looking for. His religion. I've done this procedure a lot lately, and it almost never fails.
In 8 out of 10 cases their religion is the common key.
AtrumMixer 4 weeks ago
@Quex01 That's not true. Michael H. Hart is a jew, for example. All this conspiracy theories about jews are irrational and paranoiac.
paesanot 4 weeks ago
@paesanot Conspiracy theories. Are they? Are they really? I do it out of curiosity. These days I always look up the most opinionated people and their religion just to confirm if there might be anything to these, "old irrational paranoid" rumours.
If people bothered to look up facts themselves, instead of letting the media tell them what is fact and what is not, perhaps the world today would be a much much better place.
AtrumMixer 4 weeks ago
I am a white brazilian, and I loved your video. This is the first one I saw, I hope your other videos are as good as this one!!
Thank you for posting this sir.
CarlosAlbertosig 4 weeks ago
@Quex01 Well put. Their little scheme is coming to light.
NiveusVir 4 weeks ago
This isn't a bad video, but the presentation is a bit dated, certainly for a YouTube video. Now that you've updated the website, you ought to look into modernizing the presentation of these videos, too.
arikault 4 weeks ago
To begin to understand why this absurd obsession with diversity and race mixing has infected media and academia so perversely today, I suggest searching for videos by Dr. Kevin MacDonald. He's written several books, most notably "The Culture of Critique" which outlines the strategies, and execution of those strategies have been used to erode all Western society's from within.
You can also look up his book on Amazon to read the summary comments for a great educational primer.
soakthisup 1 month ago in playlist More videos from AmRenVideos
@lakewood425
"Semite-is makes no sense"
Even semite makes no sense but I have to talk this way because of racetards like u who created these concepts in the first place. Sem-ite means the descendants of Sem (a biblical figure). Thats it, the 'race' who supposedly descended from one person in the bible lol. That's also where they got Hamites for africans because the bible said the descendants of Ham would be the servants of servants forever. This is how they justified slavery LOL fucking religion
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
@TheNarcMan
"Bigot, that word has such a powerful meaning"
I only used it because to u the idea that the ancient Persians thought Africans were the most handsome race on earth is offensive. Shows how insecure & hateful u are. I mean it's just an opinion. Get over it weirdo.
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
@lakewood425
You can stop embarrassing yourself any time you're ready little darlin'
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
I look forward to the end of Egalitarianism, Multicultralism, Miscegenation, and Race denying.
Marlon17901 1 month ago 16
@lakewood425 I'm sure Isaac newton is insulted that you appropriate his accomplishments via the notion of race.
TheCarydal 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
This is one of the most flawed and baseless argument from a racist I have ever heard........sorry bud your a fool.
fixdeluxe1 1 month ago
@fixdeluxe1 boy that's a great argument. really deconstructed the video point by point. well fucking done.
DanKWynn 1 month ago
@DanKWynn Why would I bother when he is spreading a message of racial inequality....
fixdeluxe1 1 month ago
@fixdeluxe1 he's spreading the message of racial inequality because the races are fundamentally unequal
DanKWynn 1 month ago
@DanKWynn Right,and that explains why people of all races succeed and fail in life.There are black billionaires,white homeless drug addicts and Asians that aren't small and smart, as well as vice versa.It has nothing to do with biology.
fixdeluxe1 1 month ago
@fixdeluxe1 Black people are only billionairs in White countries. on Average Black people are infected with AIDs. Have an IQ of 70. Black people 300 yrs ago were living in Mudhuts, couldn't farm, were dying from Famine. Africa saw no progress until the Europeans came and built roads, homes, cars, and vaccines.
Biology has to do with everything. IQ, Skin, Heigth, Productivity.
My race is simplely Not the same as yours, in every way. We should stop fighting it and embrase it.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@lakewood425 That BrokenTengu99 is an idiot. I've seen his retarded postings on other channels.
Marlon17901 1 month ago 8
@lakewood425
"Black people are only billionairs in White countries"
Whoops. Gold mining West African civilisations traded with Europeans who considered them their equal as early as the Renaissance. This led to the slave trade though. A population decline led to societal weakness. European colonisers saw this & took immediate advantage.
Egypt's 25th dynasty was black African.
Ethiopia was rich & powerful enough to successfully defend itself against colonialism against Italy.
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
@TheNarcMan There is no recorded history of Blacks operation and running any profitable organization other tan enslaving their fellow African counterparts and selling them as slaves to Arabs and Europeans.
Black people are not equal to Europeans, Physically, Genetically, Biologically, Historically. Nature does not do equal.
We're not the same, we must accept it and push forth for Homogenous civilizations.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@lakewood425
"There is no recorded history of Blacks operation and running any profitable organization"
Where do you think Arabs got coffee beans from shit for brains? How do you suppose Africans ended up with horses? Friendly Arabs gave them away?
"Nature does not do equal"
You're living proof. You'd be upset if you could conceptualise.
"The Original and longest lasting Egyptian Empires were Caucasian"
Im pretty sure they were Egyptian. Just a wild hunch. Y'know those brown/copper skin people?
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
@TheNarcMan Black Africans did not grow or make Coffee.
Europeans brought the horses to Africa when they colonized parts of it, Europeans brought the horses to America as well.
Those brown/copper skin people were most likely mulattoes, descendants of Egyptians and Nubians, and they did a horrible job running Egypt much like everyother civilization they try to control.
We're simplely not the same, go to Africa if you believe you can run a nation, we want our nations Homogenous.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@lakewood425
"Black Africans did not grow or make Coffee"
Yeah they did. They also used coffee beans as counters in complex maths multiplications when calculating their trade. They used a cool short cut method of multiplication similar to how a computer multiplies.
"Europeans brought the horses to Africa"
Nope, Arab traders.
"Europeans brought the horses to America"
There was once native horses but yeah, modern horses were brought by whites.
"Those brown/copper skin people" ran Egypt from day 1
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
@TheNarcMan Since when were there coffee beans in Sub-saharan Africa. When you say Afircans do you mean black? because North Africa was populated mostly by whites/caucasians.
The black Africans weren't the ones who founded mathematics, the caucasian Africans are responsible for that.
The egyptians said there was nothing but savage cannibals in the sub-sahara.
And who do you think sold the horses to the Arabs? horses are from Europe buddy, not the middle east.
lakewood425 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lakewood425
"Since when were there coffee beans in Sub-saharan Africa"
I dunno but definitely E.Africa for thousands of years. Where do u think coffee comes from? LOL
"The black Africans weren't the ones who founded mathematics"
I think the proto calculator, a carved instrument based on counting in 12's, found in west africa might be the world's oldest example of maths?
"who do you think sold the horses to the Arabs?"
I just said Arabs sold em to blacks for gold. Not where they're from.
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
@lakewood425
"Those brown/copper skin people were most likely mulattoes"
Half black/white are not copperish coloured they look like obama. Egyptians were middle eastern people. Not white. Not black. Semitic-ish.
"Nubians... did a horrible job running Egypt"
Black Pharaoh's ruled for more than 100 years bringing religious reform until Persians invaded. It wasn't a race/hate war though just business as a famous Persian quote said "they (black Kushites) are the most handsome race of men on earth".
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
@TheNarcMan The Egptians were certainly not semites. The semites (Jews) were who the Egyptians enslaved, semites were slaves in Egypt at some point. Also the DNA found in King Tutankhuman is not found amongst Middle eastern people but west European people.
Blacks handsome, lol, and I'm the one embarrassing myself.
90% of all wars are ethnically linked.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@lakewood425
"The Egptians were certainly not semites"
I said semite-ish, meaning middle eastern people. Or did people take, uh let's say, 3 weeks to get from western Europe to Egypt & start an Empire? If they developed in the middle east for thousands of years then they're middle eastern lol. Im sick of stupid black & white cunts arguing over who Egyptians were. Afrocentric, Euroecentric cocksuckers.
"Blacks handsome"
A Persian proverb not mine. Take it up with the ancient Persians u bigot.
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
@TheNarcMan Semite-is makes no sense. look up King Tut's DNA.
Bigot, that word has such a powerful meaning.
But still. Let's just keep the races of the world seperated, and keep our nations Homogenous.
Thank you.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@lakewood425
"90% of all wars are ethnically linked."
Lol ,u don't know shit about geo politics. Technically there are 'ethnicities' in every single war ever fought (even if between two groups from one ethnicity). So this would mean 100% of wars are ethnically caused if u put it that way. But then wars taditionally always been started & fought by men. So maybe it's 100% a gender issue. I know a lot of women would agree with that LOL. Read a fucking book bitch.
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheNarcMan The Egptians were certainly not semites. The semites (Jews) were who the Egyptians enslaved, semites were slaves in Egypt at some point. Also the DNA found in King Tutankhuman is not found amongst Middle eastern people but west European people.
Blacks handsome, lol, and I'm the one embarrassing myself.
90% of all wars are ethnically linked.
lakewood425 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lakewood425
"We're simplely not the same, go to Africa"
If you think I'm African then we may not be as different as you'd like to hope. I might visit Africa one day but my recent ancestors aren't from there so it'll probably just remain a visit.
"if you believe you can run a nation"
Yeah coz the economics & government policies of Europeans & white westerners are really working out right now huh. Don't forget all those big wars & depressions we like too, LOL.
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
@lakewood425 That is why I have met a super chess champion from Ghana,and why there are many scholars of african descent in university.Accept that the situation and political/social history is to blame rather than biology.
fixdeluxe1 1 month ago
@TheNarcMan The Original and longest lasting Egyptian Empires were Caucasian. Egypt didn't turn Black until later into their last years, and it was after the Egyptians made the horrible mistake of enslaving Nubians, letting them into their civilizations, Breeding with them, and letting them takeover. Once the blacks took over Egypt, it fell.
Hopefully Americans and Europeans wont make the same mistake.
Ethiopia had a White population 3,000 yrs ago.
Research some non-PC history.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@lakewood425
" it was after the Egyptians made the horrible mistake of enslaving Nubians, letting them into their civilizations, Breeding with them, and letting them takeover"
Wrong. The Kushites (already a black Empire in their own right) pushed north & successfully invaded.
"Ethiopia had a White population 3,000 yrs ago"
Lol.
"Research some non-PC history"
But I don't have laptop. Jokes. You're a mouth breather.
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
@lakewood425
The funny thing is I could just replace Africa with Western Europe & Europeans with Romans & say the same ignorant shit. But then I'd be like you. :(
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
@lakewood425 No,there are Black Billionaires in Africa.Many African states had stable and advanced political systems(i.e the Zulus) and are also heavily influenced by Arab and Semitic culture.European colonialism,combined with their destructive imports of alcohol,tobacco,firearms and culture turned Africa into what it is today,not Biology.Politics my friend,not science.
And you are assuming I am black,when I am a mix of mongloid and caucasian and have no negroid blood whatsoever?
fixdeluxe1 1 month ago
Comment removed
paesanot 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fixdeluxe1 NO. Colonialism has NOTHING to do with the situation of Africa. Check out the video "Milton Friedman on Slavery and Colonization" here on youtube. Friedman explains that "it's not true that the wealth of the west derives from exploiting the colonies (...) THE WHEEL had not been invented in parts of Africa until the end of the 19th century (...) The average condition of life in Africa have grown enormously as a result of their contanct with the west".
paesanot 1 month ago
@fixdeluxe1 So stop blaming european people for problems they are not responsible for, and ask yourself: "why black africans were not even able to invent the wheel?"
paesanot 1 month ago
@fixdeluxe1 The black Billionaires in Africa made their $ off of slavery, and conflict diamonds, hardly a intelligent and moral career choice. Julius Malema is rich, and I can assure you he is no hard worker or swell guy, he's as crooked as the rest of the black elite.
The Zulus completely wiped out other African tribes (Hotintots), and have a long history in theft and slavery.
You're not being honest about colonization, many African states (Zimbabwe, SA) benefited from it.
lakewood425 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lakewood425
"black Billionaires in Africa made their $ off of slavery, and conflict diamonds, hardly a intelligent and moral career choice"
Like I said, western big business is so pure huh? Sweat shops all over the earth. Oil spills all over the earth. The Amazon being raped & polluted underneath the natives' feet. Somalia's fish stocks depleted & water polluted. Climate change from cO2 emissions. Australias coral reefs bleached, forests destroyed, topsoil compacted by western farm animals.
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
@lakewood425 South Africa turned into a repressive,racist third world oligarchy that is now rampant with crime and discord,and Zimbabwe is a shitty tin-pot dictatorship thanks to colonialism.
You are saying that you have intimate knowledge of African billionaires?
fixdeluxe1 1 month ago
@fixdeluxe1 Before Europeans arrived in Africa the Africans were living in mudhuts, on the verge of extinction from disease, famine, and warfare. They had no civilization and you're giving them more credit than they've earned.
A Mongrel is not white, and not to be accepted into white soceity. We don't want multicultralism, and Heterogenous civilizations wether the non-Whites are super intelligent or thugs, we want racial acknowledgemnt and seperation.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@lakewood425 You are starting to sound like a real narcissistic fool.I'm mostly white and have encountered black university professors,as well as white and Asian.My point is that intelligence,it's an individual trait,rather than a racial trait.Whites are not superior biologically,but simply had access to resources,information and had significant geo-political advantages which super-sped their development.But there are other great cultures not centered in Europe.
fixdeluxe1 1 month ago
@fixdeluxe1
Stop it! Stop it! You're making his ears bleed!
I don't know where these racists get off calling these kinds of facts 'liberal propaganda'. If it was I might have been taught it in school! In Australia in the 90's we were fed colonial pro-monarchy propaganda & told that the convicts sent to Australia were 'actually heroes that didn't really do anything wrong'.
TheNarcMan 1 month ago
@fixdeluxe1 There's no such thing as mostly white, you're either White or not, Asian or not. Unless you are white you are not white, people need to stick with a person of their own ethnicity no matter how much they think they are a member of a certain other race.
An education can help someone reach his mental IQ ability, but not surpass it. Also, bare in mind that blacks are educated by whites in European style schools, while whites educate themselves and have always done so.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@lakewood425 That is one of the most stupid things I have ever heard.You are just going to have to grow up and learn to live with mutli-racial people who DO EXIST IN THIS WORLD.I am a prime example,one of my parents is white and the other is of half pacific islander,half european decent.That makes me multi-racial.That is impossible to dispute.You are an idiot.
fixdeluxe1 1 month ago
@fixdeluxe1 Multi-racial is Not white. We do not want to make more multi-racial people, we want to continue the "White" race. To think that a half white person is white, or can reprenst the white race, or is just as good as a full blooded white person is insane, and absurd. The white race needs to continue not become mongrelized and replaces by other racial groups in their own nations. If this is too hard for you to contemplate than I simplely will not take the time to explain.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@lakewood425 A half-White half-Japanese (for example) might actually be BETTER in some regards than a full White, because he has an IQ of 102.5 to revert to, rather than one of merely 100.
nykos222 1 month ago
@nykos222 Better can mean anything anybody wants it to mean, as a White man who wants his race to continue a half-White person isn't better, race-mixing could be the cure for cancer and away to keep the sun from burning out it still doesn't produce single race offspring, it doesn't continue my race.
a 2 point higher IQ isn't really a good enough reason to forever kill off one's race now is it? miscegenation is irreversible, once done it can never be undone, so we must think carefully.
lakewood425 4 weeks ago
@fixdeluxe1 IQ has already been proven to be racially linked, Whites have a average IQ of 100, blacks have an average IQ of 70. This means that most of the worlds whites consistently have an IQ of 100. An induvivual can try to improve his Genetical IQ, but he can Not surpass it. A black man born with an IQ of 70 no matter how much he studies will never reach a 100 IQ. It's not genetically possible.
Whites not being superior to other races is your opinion, not a fact of life.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@lakewood425 So how do you explain the MILLIONS of black people who have an IQ of over 100.....like my political science lecturer....
fixdeluxe1 1 month ago
@fixdeluxe1 The bell curve distribution of IQ.
nykos222 1 month ago
@fixdeluxe1 Whites in Europe for hundreds of Thousands of yrs were traped under Hundreds of feet of snow, killer winds, scarce food & shelter. While Africans were warm, & lived in the most fertile land on the planet.
Blacks didn't have to develope a high intelligence to survive in Africa. Whites did in order to survive in Europe. Whites evolved in an environment were thinking & strategy was key for survival.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@lakewood425 Bullshit.Africa is where humans "supposedly" originated so we all come from the same species regardless.That is situational,not racial.
fixdeluxe1 1 month ago
@fixdeluxe1 Racism and xenophobia are natural. What is unnatural is living amongst groups that are not the same as oneself. Homogeneous communities are healtheir, nicer, safer.
a few Black people with a 100 IQ doesn't change the genetical IQ of 70.
the "out of Africa" theory has never been proven, and just becuase we all may come from the same place doesn't mean we're the same and should live amongst one another or breed with one another.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@fixdeluxe1 I don't have to learn to live with anything, the world though multiracial does not mean our nations have to be, people should live around and breed with their own racial group. If you want to live in a multiracial nation, with miscegenation move to Brazil, stop trying to force those racial harming ideologies into our homogenous socieities, they're unwanted.
Thank you.
lakewood425 1 month ago
@fixdeluxe1 Non-Africans have 3% Neanderthal admixture which Africans don't have. We DON'T all come from the same species, but have additional (if small) genetic contributions from other archaic human species.
nykos222 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AngelofJustize
" As soon as your wife sees me it'll be hard for you to keep her. "
LMAO !
BrokenTengu99 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lakewood425
Hello again , dumb-ass !
" We have no buissness breeding with one another or living amongst one another "
Gonna happen , whether you want it to, or not .
" Your race breeds with mine to improve yours, to make yours less primative, "
LOL ! Holy Shit , this is hilarious ! Would you like me to flood this forum with " fine exampes " of your " less primative " people ?!
" we both know all of this is true "
Got a source for this comment ???
BrokenTengu99 1 month ago
@BrokenTengu99 We'll see. I already see Multicultralism failing. Racial seperation is the future. Embrase it.
Black people have an IQ of 70, a Physical apperace similar to a Gorilla, Genetics that are ultimately usless in the modern world, and lived in Mudhuts until the 18th century. What could possibly be gained from such a retarded Gene pool?
White women will be impregnated with inferiour ape like children, and abandoned by the dad.
lakewood425 1 month ago 2
BrokenTengu99 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lakewood425
" White women will be impregnated with inferiour ape like children, and abandoned by the dad. "
And what do you have to say about the high rate of child exploitation and murder in the white community ?
BrokenTengu99 1 month ago
@lakewood425
LOL because clearly in the united states our BIGGEST problem is racial warfare.
Another hillbilly infuriated becuse of black cock in white women, nothing more nothing less.
Cheesedeg 1 month ago
Comment removed
Cheesedeg 1 month ago
@AngelofJustize Do I look like his manager? Maybe you should contact him tough guy.
crackahcrackah 1 month ago
@AngelofJustize Mike Tyson was fighting for plenty of years while Wladimir was fighting. So your point is irrelevant. Not only that, but looking at the record between the two of them shows that Wladimir has a better record.
crackahcrackah 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EVERYONE WHO HAS A FACEBOOK PLEASE LOGIN TO RT AMERICA (RT TV) WHERE THE RACE DENIERS ARE CLAIMING THAT RACIALLY AWARE WHITES ARE INNATELY MENTALLY DEFICIENT, CITING "SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE" FROM A HUFFINGTON POST ARTICLE PERTAINING TO CHILDHOOD "IQ STATISTICS" WHICH PREDICT QUOTE-UNQUOTE "RACISM" IN LATER LIFE AND REFUTE THEM!
Quote: "Next time you call group of right-wing racists a bunch of idiots, you can back yourself up with one simple word: Science!"
facebook. com /RTAmerica
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@AngelofJustize Ever heard of Wladimir Klitschko? I'd put my money on him over any of the people you cited any day.
crackahcrackah 1 month ago
@crackahcrackah Alaistair Overeem would own Klitscho any day.
fixdeluxe1 1 month ago
@fixdeluxe1 His record doesn't look at good as Klitscko's.
crackahcrackah 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AngelofJustize Joe Forman cheated. Mike Tyson can barely speak correct english. And Muhammed Ali Opposed Race-mixing.
"We're the best runners too." - I know, I see it all the time on Cops.
"skin that looks like uncooked hotdog?"- As opposed to Nappy ape like hair, and dark skin that contracts every Tropical disease?
"So why is it that you guys lie on the beach to get a tan and try to look like us" - Why do black people speak European languages, and live in white nations?
lakewood425 1 month ago
@lakewood425 You are an asshole
fixdeluxe1 1 month ago