Added: 3 years ago
From: didyoulisiten
Views: 386
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • hbapunjab, Hope you have a very,very good lawyer. Have already started proceedings to identify you and file charges against you. It will take awhile, but the outcome is already known. You will be blocked from further communication.

  • and, for the record, i agree with reverand wright in more ways than i disagree

  • huntedrasta,Now you just lost me again. Wright is a bigoted,racists, son of a bitch is no more a g-ddamn pastor,preacher,Rev than I am. I should have been, then maybe I'd have a couple million dollar home and a very,very fat bank account. You know, Al Capone set up soup kitchens, and provided flop houses. Today they call it "being a community organizer".

  • here we go again, switching subjects to avoid the real questions. just like fox news.

    ok, lets talk about wright. im an atheist. i'll be the first against organized religion and pastors and priests and imams and rabbis. however, when it comes to what it actually is that wright it preaching, it is quite a true social critique. my only disagreement with him is that he is too violent, but it is simply because of how heartfelt he is, too. at least that is my belief.

    care to answer my questions now?

  • huntedrasta,You're out of luck there. Other than, I'm not an atheist, I completely agree with you on organized religion, no kidding either. Now Wright is another thing. He was talking (not preaching), blame everyone else and look at poor me and what you did to my ancestors. You owe me,me,me. Same damn shit as Jessie Jackson(the now politician version of him). Martin Luther King sure as hell didn't Preach that crap.

  • this is such a bullshit video

  • i wish yall would stop with that damn preacher

    if U!!! listened at all he disowned his sorry ass

  • We the People cannot elect our way out of tyranny. Any assertion that by electing either McCain or Obama we can cure the ills that now plague America is simply naive or based on a lack of information regarding the corrupting forces that truly influence and control our government and political process.

  • but surely you agree that the media and those who remain powerful despite "official" changes in leadership see to it that information concerning our governing systems and the people we are voting for is distorted?

  • huntedrasta,That is why, in this election cycle, I finally got fed up with what the media focused on or failed to report. You said my video was bullshit. Well, I got news for YOU, I didn't say Free Elections Were A Mistake, and then three days later say I supported free elections in Cuba. This, coming from a man that stayed in a church, with his mentor, for over 20yrs, who preached hatred and racism.PLEASE! Obama is what,s BULLSHIT here.

  • huntedrasta oh yes very distorted fox news is No 1 for that they never give you the truth about anything

  • austinediting,If you will open your EYES (your ears sure aren't open) you will NOTICE, that was taken from CNN, not FOXNEWS. Obama said it, NOT FOXNEWS. Are you that big of an idiot or "JUST ANOTHER DEMOCRAT TALKING MONKEY"?

  • I had got an e-mail from the person above you who said the media and those who remain powerful despite "official" changes in leadership see to it that information concerning our governing systems and the people we are voting for is distorted? and I was replying to what he meant when he said the media he did not specifically say CNN Fox or any other media I pointed out Fox because of the last election and also Bush having ownership maybe you miss understood

  • austinediting,First point:This is why I made this video. This was so under reported,especially since,in Florida Obama said he supported Free Election in Cuba(guess who he was talking to). Fox is also guilty of under reporting an issue(both sides),but not as much as the rest. Last Point:"Bush having ownership"? What is that supposed to mean?

  • austinediting: im very confused about "didyoulisten", because on one part he seems to condone mass manipulation, but not only is he against obama (who says himself to be on the side of truth and so far has told more truths than his adversaries) and uses the same type of propaganda against obama. like this video. what do you think?

  • huntedrasta,What is so confusing? I said under reported or failed to report. I asked a simple question,"If he thought it was a mistake that Palestine had free/open elections,what did he think about our type of elections?"."Truth?" He hasn't told the whole truth this whole time. Only if it suites him. "100yrs.war",that was truth? Want more examples? Obama is a Socialists with an agenda. He will say or do anything it takes to get elected. Check out his Chicago tactics that got him first elected.

  • i agree that it is odd that he should not promote democracy in any situation. however it is my personal views that for democracy to function the people need to be free to think open-mindedly, and not have other major concerns. which is the case in palestine, because its a struggle to survive. and they try to make it so in the USA by making everyone scared of terror. thats how extremists get voted in, like bush mccain hamas hitler

  • huntedrasta,All right, you were OK until you hit that "by making everyone scared of terror. thats how extremists get voted in, like bush mccain hamas hitler " thing. Now you want to converse with me, those Democrat, Talking, Sound Bite Shit dont't go.

  • didyoulisten, do you not admit that the war on terror, as well as the threat itself was glorified by the media? and that it suits the republicans (in this case bush and mccain) to have a war to wage, an excuse for such huge spending, an excuse to take the mind of the people off what is happening in their own country? fuck democrats and republicas, all i want is the truth. and you should to. "listen to what politicians say"??? listen to both sides and you'll see we're in trouble all over

  • huntedrasta,Glorified,no. There is no glory in war. There is no glory in terror. War is for one thing,KILLING,that is all. Just about ALL HERO'S are dead. Very few survive their heroism. The ordinary cop,fireman,soldier or anyone else in a dangerous profession are not a Hero automatically just because of their job. THEY CHOSE TO DO IT. Congress is made up of almost nothing but Lawyers. Lawyers should be DEEP6ed. Navy term(water grave).That should give you an idea of what politicians mean to me.

  • you are avoiding the matter at hand by debating the term i used. glorified, given too much importance, whatever.

    also, if you hate all politicians then who are you going to vote for? are you going to vote at all?

  • 4. The direct, un-apportioned taxes on labor in violation of the tax clauses.

    5. The federal gun control laws in violation of the Second Amendment.

    6. The failure to enforce immigration laws in violation of the "faithfully execute clause."

    7. The construction, by stealth, of a "North American Union" without constitutional authority

  • 1. The Iraq invasion in violation of the war powers clauses.

    2. The Federal Reserve System's violation of the money clauses.

    3. The USA Patriot Act's violation of the privacy clauses.

  • Demanding an official response within forty (40) days, the Notice includes seven (7) Petitions for Redress of Grievances regarding substantial violations of the Constitution:

  • On June 30, 2008, approximately 1200 American citizens will begin the process of exercising the Right by formally serving a Legal Notice and Demand for Redress upon the President, the Attorney General and every member of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate at their local district offices.

  • "If money is wanted by Rulers

    who have in any manner oppressed the People,

    they may retain it until their grievances are redressed,

    and thus peaceably procure relief, without trusting to despised

    petitions or disturbing the public tranquility."

    Journals of the Continental Congress, 1:105-113

  • To be sure, the widespread exercise of this Right holds significant implications for our nation and are most worthy of your interest. Here's what the Founders sitting as the first Congress had to say:

  • Most do not know that this profound natural Right, first articulated 800 years ago in Magna Carta, is embodied and protected by the Petition clause of the First Amendment -- the same Amendment which protects your voice in the defense of Freedom. Very importantly, academic research since 1986 makes clear the Right to Petition for Redress is NOT a redundant statement of the Right of Speech. It is in fact, the individual exercise of Popular Sovereignty.

  • To secure this end, the People have begun to claim and exercise a little-known, but unalienable, "Right of Redress," rather than depending upon the will of the majority as defined by precinct voters, those who cast votes on Capitol Hill, and those that vote from the inner sanctums of our Courthouses.

  • June 30, 2008 may be remembered in history as the day Americans began, in earnest, the moral and solemn process of holding their (servant) Government accountable to the Constitution -- under threat of withdrawal of allegiance, support and tax money.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more