Added: 4 years ago
From: nokanmov
Views: 142,925
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (133)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • co to ktos wytumaczy??

  • nice after-effects. fail

  • The flashes are static discharges.

  • The point of my comment was missed and it makes me sad. even if you fix the angle of the plane it still does not account for a full 3/4... maybe half is covered. my other points were ignored entirely. explain the pentagon plane and lack of wreckage. explain the research being done in that part of the pentagon. explain the other building that fell on it's own. i don't believe bush did it, he isn't that smart. but don't act like he's the only one in charge. he was a figurehead just like the rest.

  • wall shot

  • Sim não vimos destroços de aviao no pentagono, apesar do tamanho de um avião sempre deixa trem de pouso ou uma turbina enorme, Bush é um grande mentiroso.

  • Every video of the 9/11 event always leads me to the same questions. The planes that hit the towers were boeing 767s. This plane has a 156ft wingspan. The face of the tower is 200ft wide. tell me why the footage shows a small craft that only has about a 50ft wingspan? why doesn't this plane take up 75% of the tower's face? why doesn't the tower topple like a game of jenga? then i begin to wonder why there was no plane wreckage at the pentagon or wtf happened with wtc 7? think about it...

  • @RockyFckinZombie because the second plane struck the building in a sharp angle

  • @RockyFckinZombie @FinWolf100 that and it was very far to the side of the building, not hitting it dead centre as the first one did to the north tower, the fact that debris was not found properly, is probably due to the mass of the buildings that came down ontop of the aircraft, don't forget that an aircraft if made up of a light weight aluminium airframe, now saying that it doesn't have the ability to punch into the building is wrong, but to say that there will be alot left would be lieing

  • At 0:09 you can clearly see a hitmarker xD

  • the 9/11 was made from bush regime bcs the WTC will alive a crash with big airplanes ... only a bomb can destroy the structure of the building

  • fake!!

  • LOL wow...it's lost one of the rutters on the right wing because it turned the nose downward at a sharp fast paced angle LMAO look at a plane and read about the mechanics thereof before posting stupid shit. The wind, the speed of the plane and the force in which the wing rutter had to navigate blew it off. GET REAL AND GET OVER YOURSELF FUCKTARD

  • This is obviously paper from the other tower floating in the air that got ingested in to the engine .

  • Maybe the lights on the plane? U know they all have lights so that other planes can see them at night

  • Never mind that 'pod' under the fuselage which in other footage is clear to see with a shiny metallic square cover on it and explodes just prior to making contact with building.

  • @dobberdoss Exactly what is that "pod" under the fuselage? Is it so the New World Order and Bush's chronies could steer the plane into the building safely from some monitor in a basement somewhere? LOL! Get real..

  • @NowKillYourself ,

    Is that your theory? If you knew anything you would know BUSH was too much of a fucking moron to even keep a secret let alone be in on a plan to destroy THREE of the WTC buildings so mugs like you would quite happily have your rights taken from you and others could make billions of dollars out of illegal wars. Maybe you should get real. I have no probable "motive "unlike your government

  • @dobberdoss Again, what exactly is that "pod" under the fuselage? Don't dodge the question again. 

  • @NowKillYourself

    There is no "pod.

    In this picture you see a U.A. 767 that is painted as the one that hit the southtower:

    yyy.luftfahrt(dot)net/galerie/­photos/2006/20/1151238013_N651­UA_Boeing-767-322(ER)_United-A­irlin.jpg

    U clearly see the white stripe at the bottom of the plain, that is visible in the video.

    U can see also, that there is a dark blue area between the wings. This is what u think is a "pod". It looks even darker because its painted with a less reflecting paint than the rest.

  • @LuckiZero I never claimed there was a "pod". I thought you or maybe someone else was claiming there was, so I was asking exactly what it was.. Anyway, remote control aircraft are rigged from the inside, not by some "pod" attached to the carbon fiber belly panels under the fuselage.

  • @NowKillYourself these planes are not made out of carbon fiber.

  • @Caellest89 No shit. The fuselage is pieced together by 99% clad aluminum panels, around skeletal system of spars (material is classified by Boeing).

  • @Caellest89 [continued] By the way, I was talking about the belly panels. The fuselage is aluminum clad, but there are a series of panels that enclose the landing gear below the plane. These ARE a lightweight carbon fiber material. I know this because I use to work for Boeing on the 777 Moving Line in Everett WA. Belly and side panels (beneath the plane, between the aft and fwd joins) are all the same for the 777, 767 and 757.. Two 767's and two 757's were hijacked on Sep 11th..

  • @NowKillYourself Oh I see. I thought you meant all fuselage panels.

  • The flash you circle was from inside the building behind the plane. MANY witnesses from inside WTC stated that just before the planes hit in BOTH buildings explosions tore apart the basement, lobbies and other areas of the buildings.

  • The first flash you circled was likely a piece of the engine chipping off.

  • fuck bush from italy

  • thats called the light flashing on its wing dumb ass

  • @HaloHoggers ya the lights when theres a plane in the night sky so wont crash or midair coliision right

  • finally a valid video that actually found something to debate.

  • in this video the flash looks more like a flame what do you think?

    xxx.youtube.com/watch?v=-x8fs2­sZmas&feature=related

  • It has been said that American Airlines flight 77 had two armed and loaded F-16's looking for it as it was flying low in New York, one mile away one got a lock on it and fired as the plane went in on a tilt the missle couldn't hit it so a split second before the missle hit first... And the huge blow maybe was that huge plane ramming into the tower at 55 plus mph

  • @2112rushnerd Yes, and that person is an uncontrollable window licker. A 'retard' if you will...

  • You guys are supprised that the engines are stalling out at that speed and turn? perhaps you should learn somthing about flying...

  • che immagini impressionanti!!!

  • devil bless america

  • Hey everybody,,,I was flying that plane and i bailed out 7 seconds before we,,,,i mean they hit WTC 2....I'm l,iving high on the hog because of my 2 week employment offered by the CIA...

  • Comment removed

  • the left wing of the plane disappears behind the building on the left, wich is far beyond wtc...it's either a cgi or hologram.

  • @zachzodia it is not far beyond the wtc, it is far in front. The guy with the camera films at a low angle and the smaller buildings in the front are blocking the view of the left wing for a millisec. Not a trick, no cgi. The same event is shot from multiple angles by all kinds of people.

  • you see no doubt pops of small demo..and shout becuse aluplan can not cut true steeal and bigger cores is imo´possibel..

    This plan will normal explove ousite and fall ind many peaces to ground like pancake..why peopel dont think over this is total impossibel for plan go in this bulding like that..they still in chock and fokus on other things.

    Like they thing is possibel for building after 1 hour smas to dust and pieces of fire from fuel there was burn out very fast.

    is a joke..

  • Did you guys see the dust/smoke cloud come off the first tower it hit??

  • over 9 years later, people are still arguing over it. Everyone's shouting at each other over it, but not a single comment has spoken about the victims, only the facts and rumours behind it all. Lets remember the victims and their poor families and try to get on with our lives. After all, calling someone names on youtube makes you just as pathetic and almost as stupid. How would a flash affect what happened? Its done now, no going back, and all the arguing in the world isn't going to solve it.

  • what are these flashes? are you fucking kidding me? have you ever seen a plane before? they have lights on the wings and the tips. I know everyone wants to believe that the government had something to do with this, but im sorry we just got attacked. Plain and simple. These assholes somehow got on our planes and hijacked and drove these planes into the WTC. Stop trying to brainwash yourself into thinking it was a conspiracy. RIP to all who lost their lives on this day, Never ever FORGOTTEN.

  • @TheBruinsFan17 The flash that is circled in red, @ 0:03-4 is in a location, where there are no lights on the plane, it's a flash, in thin air.

    The only places that have white beacons are the wing tips.

    The fuselage underbelly has 1 red light between the wings that flash when the engines are running, & 1 red light on top of the fuselage for the same purpose, & of course, the directional lights on each wing tip.

    watch?v=e3KINKVnANQ

    As for the post impact flashes, most likely glass.

  • @TheBruinsFan17 it was you fool carnt you see that , There was bombs planted in there there were misiles on the planes the planes were described as not being as a normal one should look like

  • @NinjaJelleyBeaN Most of the people I have seen claim that the planes were not normal are not, themselves, normal. They all need to go in to a competent mental health care provider and check the torque on their head bolts.

  • @leftysergeant They also don't know shit about airplanes

  • @TheBruinsFan17 "we just got attacked" ..... "Somehow got on our planes" ..... Im sorry this is not enpugh proof to me that "Someone" Hijacked a plane and can drive the plane into the Towers.

    If the official side of the stroy is enough for you. then im sorry, youve been lied to.

    Do you SERIOUSLY beleive, After ALL the Coverups the Government did, That these Hijackers, (That Couldnt fly a Plane) Drove the Planes into the towers, In such a secure airspace like new york?

    Seriously?

  • @Peaceinlifenowar What do you mean they could not fly a plane. They went to flight school. Maybe they weren't all that good but even the barfoot Bandit could fly a small single engine without so much as enrolling in flight school. You silly little "truthers" and your cute little theories.

  • @trekfanful Flying a piper or cessna is differs from flying a 767. Even the instruments are completely different. To find your destination, you need the tower and special codes you have to enter for the autopilot. Just try it with a flight simulator for pilots (a real simulator, no computer game) and try to hit the towers or the pentagon. Film it and post your attempts. Then we talk again in flying is an easy job.... You need a special training for such big planes.

  • @TheThore the instruments are different, but the principle is the same. You got an artifical horizon, altitude, your vertical speed indicator and your navigation display. Then there are some other instruments, but these are the basic ones. To find your destination you do not need the tower at all. Air Traffic control is only to seperate flights.

  • @MultiRandom6 you are a such an idiot!!tell me something,the attack at the WTC was at 2001...today we have 2010 and your country still sends american soldier in Iraq and Afganistan etc...Do you realise that the victims of Bush's goverment are not only the people who died at WTC but also all these soldiers that die everyday??And all this because your country wants MONEY!

  • @oskarthecocker first of all we started this damn war bevause it was a fucking terrorist attack. and in 2010-2011, believe it or not bush isnt president you dumb fuck. now its obama sending fucking troops to not only iraq and afghanistan, but to libya! and do you really think we are the only ones in a long war? oh and one more thing jackass, this war has absolutely nothing to do with money. so do your fucking research and maybe blame someone other than bush for the ongoing war!

  • @MultiRandom6

    "Nothing to do with money." LOL

  • @splendid1000 it has to do with terrorism ok. please put your mind in the present and realize what is going on. there is a war because of terrorism, and thats all there is to it. maybe if you remember when they attacked and killed 3000 ppl on 9/11, youd realize why we are in this war.

  • @MultiRandom6

    You're funny

  • @splendid1000 your kind of being retarded just saying

  • @MultiRandom6

    You kind of ARE retarded just saying

    LOL

  • @splendid1000 excuse me for not caring about my grammar when talking to a retard, just saying and this is getting a bit ridiculous

  • @MultiRandom6

    Only more proof that you are intellectually challenged. I wasn't addressing your grammar you moron, even though it's laughable as well. I was emphasizing the fact that you aren't 'kind of' being retarded, but that you ARE retarded. Anyway, money HAS been made off the war and you are a fucken fool if you think otherwise. Billions were made off put options from American and United investors alone LOL. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

  • @splendid1000 im laughing at the fact that you care so much about how i emphasize you being retard that you felt the need to start an argument over that. and so what if we have made money off of it. that does not put aside the idea that this war was started because of terrorism. again, remember 9/11. would you rather sit back and put oursleves at greater risk of another attack or potentially gain protection. in the long run, the war will have an awful effect, but for now, it will have to do.

  • @MultiRandom6

    you are blind

  • @MultiRandom6

    I emphasized YOU being a retard brainiac lol. I guess you dont know what put options and tip offs are. Keep believing in the "war on terror" if it makes you feel better.

  • @splendid1000 ok this is the answer im gonna end with: i have my opinion and you have yours. neither of us know officially who is right. you can believe whatever the hell you want because quite honestly, it doesnt bother me. i dont even know you, so why should i care what you think? maybe now youll shut your mouth about this?

  • I believe that so many people died because tha U.S goverment and Bush wanted to find a very good excuse,in order to beggin a war..The people of America should understand this,instead of blaming the bad terrorists..this is just the easy way...i know it's hard to face that the man you voted for president(the fucker named Bush)did all this because of money..

  • @oskarthecocker

    i believe you're a retard...

  • @MultiRandom6 do your research you retarted ignorant son of a bitch

  • @BBJ737800

    what the hell does that mean? it was a terrorist attack and bush had nothing to do with it! do YOUR research man, hardly any evidence if any is strong enough to call bush and the government liars about that!

  • @MultiRandom6 Well I know you commented 6 months ago on this but I just wanted to say that I have never scene a united air lines jet that has what looks like missles straped to it's belly either.

  • PAY ATTENTION!: WTC South Tower: A missile is seen to be fired from a retro fitted missile pod on the planes' underbelly as the planes' nose strikes the building. Not only can one see (in all versions filmed by press and the public) a corneal flare at the back of the missile pod glowing white hot, but also, more importantly, a vapor flare as the incendiary missile breaks the sound barrier!! - watch it again and again!! As for the PENTAGON? Well no one was permitted NEAR it that day, remember????

  • @brandnewview

    Actually, that's static discharge from the fuselage of the plane.

    No missles needed.

    What, are you under the impression that a 757 wouldn't explode exactly like that if flown into the WTC?

    Why does it have to be a fucking missle to you clowns?

    Learn something about the static build up on the fuselage, then go talk to a flight technician at any airport you choose and ask them what they think.

    You know why there's a grounding strip on every commercial jet right?

  • @socratescafe THATS BECAUSE THE WHEELS ARE TOUCHING THE GROUND YOU FUCKING RETARD

  • Lovely! A camera makes a little glitch that comes out in the end product of the video and bingo! You've got yourself a conspiricy theory right there. Its aliens!!! Its fucking sipderman!!!! Lar-dee-dar!

  • Wow guys. How is it strange that the nose (loaded with electronics) might flare up? Or how is it strange that a giant "bullet" going 600mph into a steel structure might create sparks and combustion? There are battery packs, transformers, all sorts of electronics that can go off, not to mention compressed oxygen which is highly combustible.

  • this is the first of the hundreds of times that i have watched this image go into the building that points out the explosive 'flashes' before and after it strikes the building.

    i have seen other videos with the explosive 'flahes' but never on this image....

    good job for pointing them out!!

  • it goes in like butter...nothing falls down...an airplane is basically a flying aluminum can. If it was strong enough to be safe it wouldnt get off the ground. Here is cuts throw steel and concrete like they are butter!

  • watch?v=5j_c1tPMiG0

    who wants to know the truth should watch this ;)

  • one it would have hit before the plane so there would have been a boom before second the flash before is friction a plane going 500mph hitting steel is going to spark so people don't jump the boat the government had no reason to do this to thousands of people you people think its cool and it is but yet again fraud with videos oh ya and the INTERNET it can lets see LIE.

  • you twat if u new anything! a Real Plane can never fly that low goin 500mph thats the fucking facts!! Look it up

  • @Tommilee09 Really now? So how fast do you think a plane would have to go in order to fly that low?

  • @Tommilee09 Really now? So how fast do you think a plane would have to go in order to fly that low?

  • @Tommilee09

    by "low" how low do you mean? And why couldn't it? I await your detailed analyses of this.

    Or is this just some shit someone told you, so you believed them?

    By the way, 90 floors up isn't considered that low. Ground effect barely happens at that altitude.

  • i dont uderstand how the plane crashs into the building like it pauses for a second then explod wont it go right true or expold on impact nit pause

  • All wings on all planes hold the Fuel! it was have never made it into the WTC towers thats a fact

  • Video compression artifact. They appear only on single frames (one 30th of a second). Probably do not appear on original camera footage. Who knows how many times this footage has been transferred and copied... meaning compressed and recompressed and recompressed again. "Replicative Fading." Ever make a photocopy of a photocopy and then a photocopy of that photocopy? Try it. Resolution and artifacts occur after only a few generations of doing this.

  • It might be some error and quality pooring because compression. But this kind of flashes is seeing all videos about WTC during plane crash and during building burning period. Peoples all over the world didnt know enough the USA foreing policy, because USA foreing military operations and imperialism thats why 9/11 happend. If it happen how goverment want us to belive it happend. They will and truth still can be different things.

  • USA is world best to doing brainwashing and propaganda war is still live with media, because media controlls peoples opinions .

    But im hopefully waiting that new president borning lot of good things about USA peoples, not only good for imperialism and armament industries.

  • Thanx 4 reply. Any ideas what these flashes could be if not compression artifacts? Unusual that they appear and disappear so quickly. If missile then would persist for more than single frames. Very curious. Is it possible this original was shot on film, 8mm, 16mm? Analog tape might create this artifact. Anyone know what format original film was? What could these be? Noticed also wisp of smoke from right wing right after flash. Cant miss it. Would love to hear some more ideas. Very curious.

  • There is only few peoples who can speaking this kind of things. You are one of them. 9/11 is so problematical issue, that rational conversation is difficult most of peoples. Very strange things happend at that day.

    Conspiracy and truth mixed movie and filisofic movie at 9/11 would be so indresting. Because all things what there happend never be released the public. Path 9/11 is very good mini TV serial. That tells lot about terrorism and age of terror discovery document is good too.

  • I agree there are a lot of strange circumstances. Conspirators get away with it by creating much confusion and leading people in all kinds of directions. I just think our time is better served concentrating on details of the incident that have potential to reveal facts that can be used to expose the truth. Though unusual, I just don't see this anomaly turning into anything substantial that can help the cause. Plenty of real smoking guns in the 911 conspiracy to focus on. Interesting though. :-)

  • To clarify. I think it is important to consider that some of these anomalies may be intentionally put there to confuse and distract us. While we spend time on things, though strange, that we cannot prove, are we perhaps doing the conspirators a favor by looking in the wrong places for smoking guns? Just something to think about. I find the video interesting none the less so keep posting videos please. :-)

  • @AlienPet13 oh, well I'm SURE IT'S THE GOVERNMENT MISSES THAT YOU'RE SEEING BEING FIRED OFF, OR PERHAPS THE CHARGES OF THERMITE THAT MELTED THE STEEL!!!

    You fucking douche bag. you're as stupid and suspicious as all these other assholes.

  • @AlienPet13

    This wasn't film. It's definitely video. This, by the looks of it has been:

    1) Digitally zoomed(hence the aliasing)

    2) CODEC'd to death.

    If you want to know what those artifacts are start by comparing to similar footage. I've seen most and not seen these artifacts. Which of course leads me to believe that they are artifacts of the CODEC's it's been squeezed through.

    Or, open it in a video editor and watch it frame by frame.

  • The sparkley dots at moment of explosion could be a DU emission.

  • Yea i have read and hear some things about DU bombs. Horrible destruction force and nyclear dust fly all over the New York. Now i remember, William Blum book tells about DU.

  • It's so distorted it's difficult to make out exactly what it is, however my guess would have to have been the result of the engine chewing up a small bird just before impact, or even a detonation device on the plane exploding pre-maturely.

    If it was a missile, judging by the frame rate it would have been visible.

    Of course that is merely a guess. :)

  • if it was a missile....seriously u wud be able to tell alot better than that

  • Peoples believe exactly what media tells.

    Noam Chomskys Book - Madia Controll tells very well what "Western" media tell and drop off to news.

    I ASK QUESTION.

    What USA (world order police) have done, that they have "terrorists" endless wrath?

  • Thousands of innocent people died on 9/11 for state sponsored terrorism.

    Look at the truth at

    ---- listep. wordpress. com ----

    You will never doubt that the events of 9/11 were state sponsored after reading this. You will never doubt again what happened on that fateful day after reading this.

    Real patriots question.

    --"The say tyranny and oppression come to this land it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy" -- James Madison

    Spread the truth!

  • r u retarded it did not start before and the plane went through the tower

  • Funny video, lol. Maybe next time the sand niggers will nuke New York.

  • Wait, so now the plane doesn't have lights on it? Ugh! You people are so inconsistent...

  • bin laden and bush are best friends

    this was planned by them too

    if you defend bush fuck you

  • I don't think so... I do think that its possible that something strange happened that day though, and that it is even more evident in the incident of the plane hitting the pentagon, as 1) the explosion occured before impact, and 2)there was very little damage, not a large hole, like a plane would make.

  • wow how could god create such stupid and retarded individuals like you.

  • Im not 100% sure what JewFor911Truth say. But raligion and democracy idolatry, and socalled patriotism is weakness of USA.

    More that people read that more he/she knows, and less he/she goes way that BIGSHOE/politician mens want to working class to go.

  • OMG , that was so clear

  • 9/11 wasn't an inside job. People can throw all their evidence at me as much as they want, but historically speaking it's not surprising ANOTHER terrorist attack happened on our country, it's just that 9/11 was bigger than the first WTC bombing and all the other previous attacks we've had over the years. The flashing could be anything from reflections to camera pixel error, and besides, the explosion was already mid-combustion when you see the flashes. Bush didn't want all of the after effects.

  • Interesting! The first flash is at the rear point of the engine. There are a couple more flashes in the explosion at the end too.

  • there is even a crazier theory going on the net, that the planes were just a mirage or sum like that, it can be seen in this vid too... if you look at the planes left wing before it crashes into the WTC, you see the tip of the left wing dissapearing into a building wich is impossible.. so this started a nother conspiracy theory.

    if interested do sum researcg bout it

  • There are mixed views on 9/11. And until that fucking U.S government admits that is was an inside job, there will always be arguments like this.

  • nothing like 911 has ever been recorded on camera before except in C.G.I. so who the fuck knows if it don`t look right

  • Why the Fuck would there be a need to fire a missile when these TERRORIST are already flying a plane into a building. Y???? answer that question??? it's total bullshit! there is no missile

  • Why offical story following peoples do not understand whant conspiracy crew trying to say. 3 steel reforced buildings in history are collapsed because of fire, WTC 1, 2 and WTC 7. And in WTC 7 never hit by any airplane.

  • i think little flickers like that are total bull. whos to say its not a glare or some shit

  • It's not a glare.. If you point a mirror and reflect sunlight.. it will only reflect where you're pointing.. The same flash that can be seen here is in every video filmed in different positions...

  • god bless , from scotland

  • Also,I can understand that an explosion is a powerful force.But was that,meaning all 3 explosions of the Towers and the Pentagon strong enough to totally obliterate every single piece of the planes so that there are no plan parts left,not a glass shard or a wing tip,nothing at all.I think not,something is wrong with that.

  • Did anyone think that maybe someone else besides Bush orchestrated the events that took place on 9/11/01? Maybe someone else went over Bush's head with the decision to do it. Because I seriously doubt Bush was smart enough to do that. Just an idea. Send feedback, Thanks

  • Seriously I really love the angle you took on this,I didn't think it was him either in my opinion.But it's not because an intellectual issue,Notice that a president only last his or her 2 terms than it's time for a new.This is obvious though,my point is a president is only as good his uses when he's in term,maybe we already have someone over Bushes head but we just don't know.Anything is possible,especially in the government,it's just my opinion.

  • It's a military plane!!! has no one noticed the colour? (battle camoulage grey/green) and the external incediary pod attached to the fuselage between the wings!!!

  • this just proves how fucked up bush is

  • the explosion occurs when the plane is already inside the building. notice how the expansion wave only shows up at the 10th second.

  • there is a fukin explosion b4 the plane actually hits the building. WTF!!! pause it like on 5 - 6 secounds nd ull see a tiny flash. Fuk terroists

  • wow, thats crazy. It just like disapears. Insane.

  • that plane is fake. No airliners crashed at the WTC. Watch "September Clues" on livevideo, google video, or youtube.

  • It just SLICES through the building!! BASTARDS!!!

  • it was a job of the goverment because when the buildings colapsed the do it like the way of the demolitios jobs with explosives

  • wow, why didnt you come forward with your vast knowledge earlier?!

  • to tell you the truth .. it looks like the lights or its the persons camera

  • very strange.

  • Erm... you know that planes have lights on them, right?

  • They do, but they don't flash like that, and the flash was far away from where the lights are on the plane.

  • THe flashes are secondary explosions. Firefighters, peoples and videos tells/shows secondary explosions.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more