Stanford Expert Considers Robots and the Law

[felpaluche]

I still prefer humans than robots.

[jub0r]

Since when does a company need a blanket waiver from liability before it can invest and innovate? We can't throw out our ability to bring legitimate suits in order to protect companies from frivolous ones.

[WLTU1932]

wow this is some really good stuff, does Stanford participant in any Robo-fests?

[Melokaliju]

You fuckin idiots! People don't need robots, people need LOVE people need the touch of another person , the presence of an spirit.... do you realyy want a world with robits? fucking punks... this will move us one step closer to hell....

[exfalsoquodlibet]

lol

[xXSparky117Xx]

You can't deny the propagation of future technology as it is inevitable.

However I agree with you about people needing more love, robots certainly can't do that, but don't put down the people that keep our world moving forward.

[lordennis01]

I agree... but in 1 minute and 34 seconds, it's hard to say much of anything at all.

[xavierartorivs]

Liability falls with the production site when it involves manufacturing robotics.

A real life issue about combat robotics is the Vulcan Phalanx. In combat, once a pilot is shot out of his or her aircraft, they are no longer a threat according the the Geneva Convention laws. A CIWS system will continue to shoot a target until it is completely destroyed and this can very well include a pilot decending in a white parachute. To shoot such a pilot is a violation of the rules of war.

[veryfuck]

StanfordUniversity is pure evil.

scientists are freaks.

[ZamatoElite]

Think you're having problems now. Wait till the robots reach singularity!