THIS MAN IS AMAZING! This needs to be mass produced and distributed immediately! Oh stupid news anchor.. water prices go up... seriously only a corporate fuck head would do such a thing.
Fox news was irresponsible in reporting this as something revolutionary. The report gives credit to a guy who is claiming perpetual motion. His machine is plugged in and hydrogen burns nowhere near the temp of our suns surface. This is irresponsible journalism by Fox.
pls don't let this happen... my family and friends are trillionares because of the oil industry... if this happens we will be mere billionares.... i don't wanta have to hang out w/ paris hilton...
are there instructions anywhere on how to do this for real??? I drive for a living and am sick of loosing thousands of $. every year worse than the one before... its pretty sad when you worked 10yrs+ for a company and the most money you ever made was the 1st day you started!!!! I would destroy several cars for a chance at this to actually work......
Sadly yes, but doesn't stop him from lifting the patent and all engineers start reproducing his products and educating everyone and having schematics everywhere online, then they can't stop it. But if he has his technology buried and patent gets bought out or they just take it from him then yes. (Nikola Telsa)
Lamotti - You're reference to Telsa and idea of free distribution as the only solution is bang on the money.
When you release control by sharing with everyone - you prevent "control" by the few who suppress/oppress.
This man is in the unique position of becoming one of most significant men to have walked the face of this planet - lets hope he has the "wit" to realize his prediciment.
You can do what this guy did by dropping a 9V battery into a glass of water. The process (electrolysis) is not new. "HHO Gas" is simply 2 parts H and one part O... what you get when you break up water (H20). Burning the gas releases heat energy and recombines the elements into water. You get less back than you put in however, due to inefficiencies in the electrolysis process. And of course, you can't get back more than you put in (conservation of energy).
You get less "useful" energy back due to losses. There are always losses when using energy and this includes transforming it from one type to another (electrical power -> stored H and O -> back to heat (combustion) -> to pressure in car cylinder -> mechanical motion of engine / car
If it were true, that would be much better... however, it isn't. Do some reading on conservation of energy and see where it leads you. Read up on electrolysis as well.
My friend you do not know what you are talking about. The principle of conservation of energy states that energy can neither be created or destroyed, it can only change form. This technology actually supports that principle. It takes very little electrical energy to release the HHO gas. Much less than you get out. HHO provides the atomic power of Hydrogen, while maintaining the chemical stability of water. It's not creating energy from nothing; it's releasing the energy that's stored.
just so everyone's aware.. water is NOT in an unlimited supply. Studies have actually shown that fresh water is decreasing in volume over the whole entire planet. but i would like to say that im happy that canada would profit from this cuz then all the other countries will pay us big bucks for all of our fresh water. canada will eventually be the most powerful nation in the world.
ok look, where does fresh water come from? From the ocean. The whole earth contants 97% of salt water and 3% of fresh water. Fresh water are come from the ocean, too. Through the mountain, lake, then become fresh water. Now scientist has been successfully purefied salt water into fresh water, but very expensive.
are you trying to refute what i said? cuz you basically just reitterated my point: fresh water is not in an abundant supply. and even if you were going to try and make fresh water from the oceans you said that it's expensive. like i said, canada will be the richest country in the world if this technology were to ever be put out there (unlikely since bush and his administration own it now). so for that im glad that i live in the best country in the world - suck my dick americans!
biggest mistake was choosing to deal with the american government. they'll just buy him out and bury the idea so they can make more and more money by dealing with the middle east. i guess their money's not helping the american citizens now with their poor poor currency and less than impressive economy. way to go bush!
Wow .. thats the exact opposite of what the U.S. government would do, it would be an Oil producing nation like the middle east who's economies thrive purely because of rising oil prices, the U.S. government and all the citizens would love to become energy independant so other countries cant control the economy as much with oil possesion. Your just a whiner that thinks everything the government does is a conspiracy, but you don't know anything.
Just tell me how saying the U.S. gov is owned by people who own the media who also own the fed is common sense. Exactly who are these people???? Sounds like some conspiracy idea or at least a load of uninformed BS to me.
In time, you'll find out for yourself. Start with Woodrow Wilson, the prez who made it all possible by allowing the privately owned federal reserve to take over america's monetary system.
"I have unwillingly ruined my country. A great industrial national is controlled by it's system of Credit. Our system of credit is concentrated int eh hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated govt's in the world.
No longer a gov't of free opinion, conviction, and vote of the majority, but a gov't by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men."
I know the fed has two much power. But i fail to see the proof you have that "they are controlled by the media", and how they would be interested in ending an effort for our country to become energy independent, one of the most pressing issues of our time. After all most of our oil lies under people who hate us, and that isnt a situation a country wants to be in.
Right. "Our" Country. Not theirs, they could care less. They own the banking systems they could give a shit about the people, the military or anything to do with this country period. And don't worry "they" (fed) the same people print out money for other countries as well
Our oil? Under their feet? You're a shmuck. U.S. could have been energy independent near the turn of the last century via Tesla's technology. But as others have already wisely stated, it is not in "their" interest for U.S. to develop free energy tech. This knowledge is kept from the plebs because it would give them too much power.
Of course it wasn't in the U.S.'s interest for all that time, it was a simple easy fuel to use, came at a relatively cheap price until recently. The problem is after about 100 years of developing your motors, generators and just about every other piece of machinery around one fuel, its not exactly easy to just "switch". You have to have the consent of American business, thats who might not have it in their "best interest", it would cost them to change.
Tesla? Why is everyone so convinced that this guy has some suppressed technology that we can't get at? I'm using his good ideas right now - AC current and radio. His bad ideas such as turning the earth into a giant conductor, just didn't pan out. Neither did his earthquake device, turbine, etc. He was brilliant - not superhuman.
To all you conspiracy theorists out there who say the oil companies bought this technology so they could keep selling their oil, that's about as ludicrous an argument as the typewriter industry paying big bucks for computer technology in order to keep them in business.
Petroleum reserves on this planet are limited; water is not. If this technology was possible, the oil companies would stand to make a greater profit on it than they would on petroleum. Think, people; think.
we would still burn fossil fuels to make the electricity needed to create HHO. Also petroleum products will eventually have more value in the form of plastics.
please stop being so close minded! be open minded! this was also done by a filipino man named "Daniel Dingle" apparently everyone seems to think this whole water powered is a HOAX!
Because it IS a hoax. Use your brain, if you have to put a set amount of energy into the system in order to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen, you're only going to be able to recuperate that SAME amount of energy in consuming the hydrogen (and that's WITHOUT resistive losses in energy).
Here is your correction: When water evaporates, and rises to the sky, it will condense in a cloud form, when the air temperature in the surrounding area is at its dew point. When enough vapor has condensed, the cloud is overwhelmed and this makes it possible for rain to fall.
thanks very much Razr - so what I think you're saying is that water vapour will not linger around like CO2 because it'll form clouds then come down as rain? say if I've got it muddled again!! :)
Please correct me if I am misunderstanding, for I am not so sure. From what I have read, the Earth emits long wave radiation and when trapped by CO2 gases and water vapour this causes Earth to warm. Wouldn't having water cars like this create lots of water vapour thus continue contributing to global warming??
the alternator of a car is more than enough to make hho provided u use an ac convertor more than 700 watts then u can produce a water splitter with some mods just research a bit more stan meyers injectors where so efficient he said they could easiely be used for jets, tanks,and his dune buggy was so efficent it would only need 22 gals of water from new york to la california thats reality folks
unfortunately nobody has been able to prove Stan Meyer's process is as efficient as he claimed. What we didn't see when the camera wasn't rolling was his batteries being recharged from the electric utility.
I am just wondering why does the flame not burn human skin but burns metal. I don't think that the flame is that smart to tell the difference between skin and titanium.
Although I have come up with my own therory how the electoysis(sp) thing is done. We put water in, we have a simple car battery and then that is for the starter. Then as the axle moves then it turns the turbine in whatever and then creates electricity so it goes in a full circle. No need for gas etc. to power the electroysis process.
We will probably never see it on the market for at least 15 years. If a car manufactuer took this idea and was going to use this water powered engine then oil companies would jump right in and pay big bucks. I mean like billions. What would you rather take 7 billion or a slight chance that every country can afford your $40,000+ car? They took the 7 billion. Oil companies are making over 7 billion dollars so what is it to spend 7 billion to keep the public using there product.
I am really getting tired of hearing about these water powered cars. I can say my car runs on water too. I put water in my radiator. What else is the car using? It's not the water that is making it run without something else. What other liquids are they using or batteries or what other type of energies are being used that need to be replenished. Let's here the whole story instead of just a car that runs on water. Jeez!!
Dear Mr. Klein, be careful that you don't loose your life like Stan Myers, A "fellow" HHO inventor. The oil companies have deep pockets, and who knows how far they'll go, once they begin to loose revenue in bigger magnitude. You know what I mean?
The oil companies don't need to do anything. Free energy is impossible. Water is not a fuel. Some free enrgy claimants like Joe Newman are hucksters. Most, I think, are just plain delusional.
your not runnin your car on the hydrogen, your runnin your car on the energy it took to produce the hydrogen. for most of us that means power generated by burning coal. the gas itself is just an energy carrier.
Ppl here have ideeas of perpetual motion cars.Ppl who belive in perpetual motion didn't paid attention in school.That's why they don't get the ideea of water cars.Water cars are very good because they don't pollute but fuel cells cars are better and are developed by big companies and i think that fuell cell cars are future not water cars.
All "water cars" are cars that consume water but get energy from another source.A normal car is an "air car" because they consume air.That's the ideea of water car.Unless they have some fusion reactor, wich nobody will put on a car, they are not water cars in the strict sense.
hes going to run into all kinds of road blocks here, , regulations , tax laws, i bet he takes his idea to get marketed & built faster in china , at least no gov road blocks there ,
Fuel Cell (which also operates cars on water) sounds much more efficient. This guy is using an internal combustion engine (i.c.e.) which is tons less efficient than an electric motor (fuel cell technology). Still, a regular gas driven car (i.c.e.) can easily be retrofitted with this, whereas fuel cell requires a whole new car - so it would make a good transistion technology.
Totally fake or mis-represented. What power supply did he use to convert the water to HHO? How much energy did the transformation require? The fact that this isn't mentioned should give you pause. If it required the energy of 3 gallons of gasoline to run the process to convert the water to fuel then the saving are quite modest indeed. The same 3 gallons he could have driven the car 100 miles, right?
He said he used an electrolysis process to convert the H2O gas into HHO. This being said, he more then likely used something like a battery to create an electric current. That, (if developed properly) could easily be created using a system of magnets to produce an ample amount of charge.
Ok so if you _could_ make hydrogen more efficiently than traditional elctrolysis - why on earth would you use that fuel in traditional engine with 70% of the energy going to waiste?
Even if you are not technically inclined take this - water + energy = magic gas = more energy + water
does not make any sense. Search for the topic and you will find number of "inventors" - none of whom explain even tiniest bit even the principle of where the extar energy would come from.
It's true. The first inventor of water powered car was poisoned. This guy is lucky to still be alive. Bush family doesn't take kindly to competition with Oil.
there was another guy that new about this and wanted to encoparate it with engines for transportation alot cheaper but mysteriously somone killed him.??
What a sham. How does he split water into Hydrogen and Oxygen? He says that he does it by electrolysis, which is running an electrical current through the water. It takes a ton of electricity to split H2O into its elements, and that electricity has to first be generated in some other way, like burning oil or coal! When he says he runs a car 100 miles on 4 ounces of water, what he really means is he runs a car on 4 ounces of water and tons and tons of electricity.
Omg that'd be soo cool if the Bush administration would fund this, but then again they take it up the ass for the oil companies so probably wont happen
sweet it does melt brick. wonder if the ceramics ever spontaniously explode like on "is it a good idea to microwave this?" :D
(i read that, bricks melting point (average, clay based) is around 2500c)
KKinsane2009 1 year ago
if you really want to run your car on water go to: thegas4free.blogspot,com
jedwhelchel 3 years ago
Perfect "story" for Fox to tell
bbtapb 3 years ago
THIS MAN IS AMAZING! This needs to be mass produced and distributed immediately! Oh stupid news anchor.. water prices go up... seriously only a corporate fuck head would do such a thing.
lamotti 4 years ago
lol i think I could luv you. :-)
anyusmoon1 4 years ago
Fox news was irresponsible in reporting this as something revolutionary. The report gives credit to a guy who is claiming perpetual motion. His machine is plugged in and hydrogen burns nowhere near the temp of our suns surface. This is irresponsible journalism by Fox.
phoglite 4 years ago
Just making sure you know that isn't the national fox news station, it is just the station in Houston, Texas.
cllonghorn 4 years ago
I'm aware - but does it matter? These are entertainment news stations and the national variety is just as ridiculous.
phoglite 4 years ago
pls don't let this happen... my family and friends are trillionares because of the oil industry... if this happens we will be mere billionares.... i don't wanta have to hang out w/ paris hilton...
survival12345 4 years ago
are there instructions anywhere on how to do this for real??? I drive for a living and am sick of loosing thousands of $. every year worse than the one before... its pretty sad when you worked 10yrs+ for a company and the most money you ever made was the 1st day you started!!!! I would destroy several cars for a chance at this to actually work......
survival12345 4 years ago
Not in a million years would this tech be allowed to surface.
That is a given. You're well aware why that is.
luckyvet 4 years ago
Sadly yes, but doesn't stop him from lifting the patent and all engineers start reproducing his products and educating everyone and having schematics everywhere online, then they can't stop it. But if he has his technology buried and patent gets bought out or they just take it from him then yes. (Nikola Telsa)
lamotti 4 years ago
Lamotti - You're reference to Telsa and idea of free distribution as the only solution is bang on the money.
When you release control by sharing with everyone - you prevent "control" by the few who suppress/oppress.
This man is in the unique position of becoming one of most significant men to have walked the face of this planet - lets hope he has the "wit" to realize his prediciment.
luckyvet 4 years ago
You can do what this guy did by dropping a 9V battery into a glass of water. The process (electrolysis) is not new. "HHO Gas" is simply 2 parts H and one part O... what you get when you break up water (H20). Burning the gas releases heat energy and recombines the elements into water. You get less back than you put in however, due to inefficiencies in the electrolysis process. And of course, you can't get back more than you put in (conservation of energy).
phoglite 4 years ago
im not downing your answer, but i was told what you put in your get and equal abmount out
morfman1990 4 years ago
You get less "useful" energy back due to losses. There are always losses when using energy and this includes transforming it from one type to another (electrical power -> stored H and O -> back to heat (combustion) -> to pressure in car cylinder -> mechanical motion of engine / car
phoglite 4 years ago
4 ounces of water = 200 miles of driving. Much better then gas.
davidschl67 4 years ago
If it were true, that would be much better... however, it isn't. Do some reading on conservation of energy and see where it leads you. Read up on electrolysis as well.
phoglite 4 years ago
Trying reading up on stanley meyers...
pimpmyhonda 4 years ago
My friend you do not know what you are talking about. The principle of conservation of energy states that energy can neither be created or destroyed, it can only change form. This technology actually supports that principle. It takes very little electrical energy to release the HHO gas. Much less than you get out. HHO provides the atomic power of Hydrogen, while maintaining the chemical stability of water. It's not creating energy from nothing; it's releasing the energy that's stored.
saustin26 4 years ago
This is truely amazing and doable. Check out my videos. I got my Merc Milan from 28 MPG highway to 44MPG Water is really the way.
Have a great weekend!
-Pete
mixcatcom 4 years ago
just so everyone's aware.. water is NOT in an unlimited supply. Studies have actually shown that fresh water is decreasing in volume over the whole entire planet. but i would like to say that im happy that canada would profit from this cuz then all the other countries will pay us big bucks for all of our fresh water. canada will eventually be the most powerful nation in the world.
alexisonfireforlife 4 years ago
ok look, where does fresh water come from? From the ocean. The whole earth contants 97% of salt water and 3% of fresh water. Fresh water are come from the ocean, too. Through the mountain, lake, then become fresh water. Now scientist has been successfully purefied salt water into fresh water, but very expensive.
graven101 4 years ago
are you trying to refute what i said? cuz you basically just reitterated my point: fresh water is not in an abundant supply. and even if you were going to try and make fresh water from the oceans you said that it's expensive. like i said, canada will be the richest country in the world if this technology were to ever be put out there (unlikely since bush and his administration own it now). so for that im glad that i live in the best country in the world - suck my dick americans!
alexisonfireforlife 4 years ago
LOL canada, a superpower. LOL
SmutFi 4 years ago
this process returns 100% of the water used to make the HHO.
lneufeld 4 years ago
do you have stoke to buy
dragonj100 4 years ago
They would shift their focus from petroleum to water, luckyvet. It's not like we don't need petroleum for other products as well.
Anyway, the point is moot because water is not a fuel.
GreatNt249 4 years ago
biggest mistake was choosing to deal with the american government. they'll just buy him out and bury the idea so they can make more and more money by dealing with the middle east. i guess their money's not helping the american citizens now with their poor poor currency and less than impressive economy. way to go bush!
alexisonfireforlife 4 years ago
Wow .. thats the exact opposite of what the U.S. government would do, it would be an Oil producing nation like the middle east who's economies thrive purely because of rising oil prices, the U.S. government and all the citizens would love to become energy independant so other countries cant control the economy as much with oil possesion. Your just a whiner that thinks everything the government does is a conspiracy, but you don't know anything.
cllonghorn 4 years ago
The US gov't is owned by the people who own 95% of our media, which coincidentally own the federal reserve.
It is not in their interest to allow this tech to emerge. Watch, deaths will follow.
luckyvet 4 years ago
LOL, CONSPIRACY!!!! .....just stop... haha, thats soooo ridiculous, how do you conspiracy theorists come up with these things?
cllonghorn 4 years ago
Conspiracy? Nope.
Protecting business interests? Yup.
How you "sheeple" can't connect the dots evades all common sense.
luckyvet 4 years ago
Just tell me how saying the U.S. gov is owned by people who own the media who also own the fed is common sense. Exactly who are these people???? Sounds like some conspiracy idea or at least a load of uninformed BS to me.
cllonghorn 4 years ago
Again, no conspiracy. Just research.
In time, you'll find out for yourself. Start with Woodrow Wilson, the prez who made it all possible by allowing the privately owned federal reserve to take over america's monetary system.
He later wrote in regret:
luckyvet 4 years ago
"I have unwillingly ruined my country. A great industrial national is controlled by it's system of Credit. Our system of credit is concentrated int eh hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated govt's in the world.
No longer a gov't of free opinion, conviction, and vote of the majority, but a gov't by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men."
luckyvet 4 years ago
I know the fed has two much power. But i fail to see the proof you have that "they are controlled by the media", and how they would be interested in ending an effort for our country to become energy independent, one of the most pressing issues of our time. After all most of our oil lies under people who hate us, and that isnt a situation a country wants to be in.
cllonghorn 4 years ago
Don't worry about it bro.
At the end of the day we want the same thing.
luckyvet 4 years ago
Right. "Our" Country. Not theirs, they could care less. They own the banking systems they could give a shit about the people, the military or anything to do with this country period. And don't worry "they" (fed) the same people print out money for other countries as well
lamotti 4 years ago
Our oil? Under their feet? You're a shmuck. U.S. could have been energy independent near the turn of the last century via Tesla's technology. But as others have already wisely stated, it is not in "their" interest for U.S. to develop free energy tech. This knowledge is kept from the plebs because it would give them too much power.
fluoridatedbrainsoup 4 years ago
Of course it wasn't in the U.S.'s interest for all that time, it was a simple easy fuel to use, came at a relatively cheap price until recently. The problem is after about 100 years of developing your motors, generators and just about every other piece of machinery around one fuel, its not exactly easy to just "switch". You have to have the consent of American business, thats who might not have it in their "best interest", it would cost them to change.
cllonghorn 4 years ago
Tesla? Why is everyone so convinced that this guy has some suppressed technology that we can't get at? I'm using his good ideas right now - AC current and radio. His bad ideas such as turning the earth into a giant conductor, just didn't pan out. Neither did his earthquake device, turbine, etc. He was brilliant - not superhuman.
phoglite 4 years ago
ty, sometimes ppl on here have some ridiculous arguements
cllonghorn 4 years ago
Okay take Bush's stance. We can store Nuclear waste on your property.
davidschl67 4 years ago
WATER FUEL CELL DOWNLOADS:
w ww,hotlinkfiles,com/browse/waterfuel/42765
w ww,hotlinkfiles,com/browse/srawofni/33693
srawofni 4 years ago
Please come to :
overunity dot com/index.php/board,8.0.html
to discuss overunity HHO gas production.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.
overunitydotcom 4 years ago
LOL WATER PRICES!
justin2021 4 years ago
To all you conspiracy theorists out there who say the oil companies bought this technology so they could keep selling their oil, that's about as ludicrous an argument as the typewriter industry paying big bucks for computer technology in order to keep them in business.
Petroleum reserves on this planet are limited; water is not. If this technology was possible, the oil companies would stand to make a greater profit on it than they would on petroleum. Think, people; think.
GreatNt249 4 years ago
greatnt249, perhaps you can tell me how oil companies can profit from water engines?
luckyvet 4 years ago
we would still burn fossil fuels to make the electricity needed to create HHO. Also petroleum products will eventually have more value in the form of plastics.
lneufeld 4 years ago
AHH.. this is true everyone! believe it or not!
please stop being so close minded! be open minded! this was also done by a filipino man named "Daniel Dingle" apparently everyone seems to think this whole water powered is a HOAX!
anno234 4 years ago
Because it IS a hoax. Use your brain, if you have to put a set amount of energy into the system in order to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen, you're only going to be able to recuperate that SAME amount of energy in consuming the hydrogen (and that's WITHOUT resistive losses in energy).
GreatNt249 4 years ago
Here is your correction: When water evaporates, and rises to the sky, it will condense in a cloud form, when the air temperature in the surrounding area is at its dew point. When enough vapor has condensed, the cloud is overwhelmed and this makes it possible for rain to fall.
Razr89A 4 years ago
thanks very much Razr - so what I think you're saying is that water vapour will not linger around like CO2 because it'll form clouds then come down as rain? say if I've got it muddled again!! :)
DeerEatingWildOnions 4 years ago
Please correct me if I am misunderstanding, for I am not so sure. From what I have read, the Earth emits long wave radiation and when trapped by CO2 gases and water vapour this causes Earth to warm. Wouldn't having water cars like this create lots of water vapour thus continue contributing to global warming??
DeerEatingWildOnions 4 years ago
the alternator of a car is more than enough to make hho provided u use an ac convertor more than 700 watts then u can produce a water splitter with some mods just research a bit more stan meyers injectors where so efficient he said they could easiely be used for jets, tanks,and his dune buggy was so efficent it would only need 22 gals of water from new york to la california thats reality folks
commando7144 4 years ago
unfortunately nobody has been able to prove Stan Meyer's process is as efficient as he claimed. What we didn't see when the camera wasn't rolling was his batteries being recharged from the electric utility.
lneufeld 4 years ago
Could anyone show me the lewis dot structure for this "HHO"
TheNewOriginal 4 years ago
i wouldnt be surprised if they killed everyone working on this project just to stop it from happening
z0rak 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
One night stands and no strings sex at > FLINGDATINGSITE dot COM <
bibbiesoccerchickft 4 years ago
oh shit fox 26 lol thats where i live...
houston tx
TRAUMA2 4 years ago
i want to see all those fucking hypocrites drinking condensate aka water from their magic car's exhaust pipe
ActiveStorage 4 years ago
I'd drink the water from a HHO only exhaust (not a gasoline hybrid)
lneufeld 4 years ago
I am just wondering why does the flame not burn human skin but burns metal. I don't think that the flame is that smart to tell the difference between skin and titanium.
MasterMurph 4 years ago
Ever heard of "Chemical Reaction"?
ToxicAngerSyndrome 4 years ago
yeah! the flame is not that smart at all!
ActiveStorage 4 years ago
Although I have come up with my own therory how the electoysis(sp) thing is done. We put water in, we have a simple car battery and then that is for the starter. Then as the axle moves then it turns the turbine in whatever and then creates electricity so it goes in a full circle. No need for gas etc. to power the electroysis process.
MasterMurph 4 years ago
We will probably never see it on the market for at least 15 years. If a car manufactuer took this idea and was going to use this water powered engine then oil companies would jump right in and pay big bucks. I mean like billions. What would you rather take 7 billion or a slight chance that every country can afford your $40,000+ car? They took the 7 billion. Oil companies are making over 7 billion dollars so what is it to spend 7 billion to keep the public using there product.
MasterMurph 4 years ago
I am really getting tired of hearing about these water powered cars. I can say my car runs on water too. I put water in my radiator. What else is the car using? It's not the water that is making it run without something else. What other liquids are they using or batteries or what other type of energies are being used that need to be replenished. Let's here the whole story instead of just a car that runs on water. Jeez!!
tshogan63 4 years ago
Dear Mr. Klein, be careful that you don't loose your life like Stan Myers, A "fellow" HHO inventor. The oil companies have deep pockets, and who knows how far they'll go, once they begin to loose revenue in bigger magnitude. You know what I mean?
1siouxbrave 4 years ago
The oil companies don't need to do anything. Free energy is impossible. Water is not a fuel. Some free enrgy claimants like Joe Newman are hucksters. Most, I think, are just plain delusional.
ArrowHead83 4 years ago
your not runnin your car on the hydrogen, your runnin your car on the energy it took to produce the hydrogen. for most of us that means power generated by burning coal. the gas itself is just an energy carrier.
PorterhouseV 4 years ago
Ppl here have ideeas of perpetual motion cars.Ppl who belive in perpetual motion didn't paid attention in school.That's why they don't get the ideea of water cars.Water cars are very good because they don't pollute but fuel cells cars are better and are developed by big companies and i think that fuell cell cars are future not water cars.
belengher 4 years ago
All "water cars" are cars that consume water but get energy from another source.A normal car is an "air car" because they consume air.That's the ideea of water car.Unless they have some fusion reactor, wich nobody will put on a car, they are not water cars in the strict sense.
belengher 4 years ago
Fricken THIEF! This is George Wiseman's invention!
Search "eagle-research" to find his site.
He has been developing this technology well before 1998.
This guy just ripped him off.
coldfill 4 years ago
it needs to much energy to porduce the HHO gas and it's fucking complicated to store.
not the way to go. good research though
bacuu 4 years ago
this was over a year ago why arent we all driving water powered cars by now?, the government and oil companys are complete B&(*&(*&*S.
stuartmoffatDOTcom 4 years ago
hes going to run into all kinds of road blocks here, , regulations , tax laws, i bet he takes his idea to get marketed & built faster in china , at least no gov road blocks there ,
knightspy 4 years ago
Fuel Cell (which also operates cars on water) sounds much more efficient. This guy is using an internal combustion engine (i.c.e.) which is tons less efficient than an electric motor (fuel cell technology). Still, a regular gas driven car (i.c.e.) can easily be retrofitted with this, whereas fuel cell requires a whole new car - so it would make a good transistion technology.
davea0511 4 years ago
The source of this video is KRIV Fox 26 Houston... just in case anyone was curious and wanted to follow up.
sirradiodude 4 years ago
Totally fake or mis-represented. What power supply did he use to convert the water to HHO? How much energy did the transformation require? The fact that this isn't mentioned should give you pause. If it required the energy of 3 gallons of gasoline to run the process to convert the water to fuel then the saving are quite modest indeed. The same 3 gallons he could have driven the car 100 miles, right?
Sorry folks, this is too good to be true.
ahz123 4 years ago
He said he used an electrolysis process to convert the H2O gas into HHO. This being said, he more then likely used something like a battery to create an electric current. That, (if developed properly) could easily be created using a system of magnets to produce an ample amount of charge.
xanwolf 4 years ago
couse we people suck on oil .
zozikas 4 years ago
where is this guy!!! why all this incredible inventions are not followed through? why the world is cage of thieves?
rentoz 4 years ago
dang, thats intresting
overmind2 5 years ago
Ok so if you _could_ make hydrogen more efficiently than traditional elctrolysis - why on earth would you use that fuel in traditional engine with 70% of the energy going to waiste?
Even if you are not technically inclined take this - water + energy = magic gas = more energy + water
does not make any sense. Search for the topic and you will find number of "inventors" - none of whom explain even tiniest bit even the principle of where the extar energy would come from.
kerosene 5 years ago
It's true. The first inventor of water powered car was poisoned. This guy is lucky to still be alive. Bush family doesn't take kindly to competition with Oil.
theredpill99 5 years ago
there was another guy that new about this and wanted to encoparate it with engines for transportation alot cheaper but mysteriously somone killed him.??
p4pro 5 years ago
Nice
hellzbound 5 years ago
yeah i guess it isnt possible at all slimstudios... the process is just not able to do anything... dumbass... its right there in front of you working
dakk005 5 years ago
What a sham. How does he split water into Hydrogen and Oxygen? He says that he does it by electrolysis, which is running an electrical current through the water. It takes a ton of electricity to split H2O into its elements, and that electricity has to first be generated in some other way, like burning oil or coal! When he says he runs a car 100 miles on 4 ounces of water, what he really means is he runs a car on 4 ounces of water and tons and tons of electricity.
SlimStudios 5 years ago
this guy is not the first to discover this, this guy is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVhXrvCCILw&search=water%20car
reyknow 5 years ago
Omg that'd be soo cool if the Bush administration would fund this, but then again they take it up the ass for the oil companies so probably wont happen
csrocker101 5 years ago
The Bush administration ARE the oil companies.
p0llenp0ny 5 years ago
looks very interesting
groovychk 5 years ago
i want to go around and melt things =D
cwoz94 5 years ago
that is cool!!! where do i sign up
???
menohaole 5 years ago
is this for real?
kdehead 5 years ago