Wow. Why is there so much negative feedback for this? It's not supposed to be the original, it's taken the idea and changed it into something unique.
yea i think the original one is better. i didn't what the guy was doing i thought the little squres were changes colors and the guy was moving the thinks idk its confusing
This was designed for lazy post 80's children that don't want to catch a cramp in their tiny little delicate hands! The original is by far still the best design!
If you had grown up, you would have the common sense to know that "catching a cramp in their delicate little hands" is a stupid idea. And how is a touch screen lazy? Two supid fucking ideas.
This new one was made because touch screens are the new '"in" thing. You haven't played with this one, so you can't have an opinion.
damn you again! what are you a rubikscubeologist or something. Okay i'll solve the whole thing...you're right-i'm wrong-i'm weak-you're strong! okay enough iz enough. I'm done with this post
I believe this argument has been logically concluded, but doubtless you will respond to us anyway out of his compulsive desire to have the last word... Ever heard of Occupatio?
This puzzle is crap, the original is way better, but your argument is flawed. What do kids do today? Play video games. How many buttons did your 80's Atari had? One, maybe two, plus a stick in the middle. Have you counted the buttons on a PS3 controller?
i don't think I like this. I didn't really like the rubik's revolutin either, but it's ok for what it's worth. I agree w/ others , this could never be solved in record time like the original. Mr. Erno Rubik is rolling over in his grave, and he isn't even dead yet! ;0)
I highly doubt you could solve this cube in under a minute, even with a very expert method. It's overpriced. I could get a collection of: 2x2, 3x3, 4x4, 5x5, 6x6, 7x7 for this price. The noise is annoying. It's probably extremely fragile.
They should make one like this but without the black seperations and make it a little bit bigger so it can be a 2x2 and all the other ones including the 8x8x8 all in one. But, I bet it's going to be expensive.
Is this cube seriously $150? o_O I could get a real, official cube for $12 at most places and it'll last longer, doesn't require batteries and can turn faster.
Granted it looks cool, but is there any other reason to get this that makes it different then a standard Rubik's cube?
You have a point there, lol! My best cube broke so I tried getting 2 of the same kind hoping for the best(rubik's retooled 2008). They're SO much stiffer out of the box then my old cube... :( Heck, they even feel different from each other! Rubik's riveting is FAR too inconsistent for my liking. It's like playing the slots and hoping for 777, lol! I just can't go back to using stiff cubes, so I got myself 2 white DIYs! :D (Being shipped)
moving the middle row is the equivalent of moving the top + bottom in the opposite direction and turning the cube. it technically could* allow for a decrease in the number of moves it takes, depending on how u count, and can be done with a normal rubix cube.
Utterly pointless. One of the nice things about the original is the way it feels when you turn it around.
feckingbillgates 1 month ago
The original one should now come with a label ''no batteries needed''.
HermanAnimation 1 month ago
Whats it do?
colgatepony234 4 months ago
the best thing about this cube is that you don't have to replace stickers:-D
jann6373 7 months ago
and point of this useless thing IS??? I'll stick with normal classic one
zilbe333 9 months ago
haha, I was dreaming about a touch screen rubiks cube like 5 years ago... made by apple!
ykliu1995 1 year ago
dumb! most of the fun of solving a rubix cube is physically moving the sides!
ethansmall01 1 year ago 6
its a junk for me, competition you cant use this
rpblcan 1 year ago 2
This is just a glowing box of colors
GodsS0N1 1 year ago 4
seamz pretty jackd up
ohyeah667 1 year ago
Wow. Why is there so much negative feedback for this? It's not supposed to be the original, it's taken the idea and changed it into something unique.
pianomancuber91 1 year ago
look's dumb.
ubathegreat 1 year ago
i got mine for $20 its so difficult to use I've only solved it mabye 10 times.
camondrums 1 year ago
I bet apple computers has something to do w/ this!
13rAdJa13 1 year ago 5
oh and 5th. it might break
udedanial 1 year ago
1st. its confusing. 2nd. uses electricity or battery, waste of electricity. 3rd. its a ripoff. 4th. why r u still reading this?
udedanial 1 year ago
I prefer the mechanic one...
vojtys15 1 year ago
Original= BEST
TouchCube=cheap/ ripoff/ messed-up/ confusing
StealthAssassin52 1 year ago
@StealthAssassin52 well rip off and all that but cheap hardly lol
ProjectMATHEW 1 year ago
The Rubik's Cube of the decade! Do they have the 2x2x2 TouchCube?
Mridrislozada 1 year ago
its sucks
mariosmarios13 1 year ago
c000000000000000l
Emilonyoutub 1 year ago
shit
Husssssi 1 year ago 2
gay!!!!!!!!!!!
smoken3rd52 1 year ago
the original is much better, this is a crap shit
keco07 1 year ago 3
yea i think the original one is better. i didn't what the guy was doing i thought the little squres were changes colors and the guy was moving the thinks idk its confusing
unfaithful121 2 years ago 4
lol , boooooring the original is way bather
B4LN 2 years ago
Mostly this is a collectors thing.
I just got one of these yesterday, it may not be for speed cubing, it's still awesome.
HanicIzKanio 2 years ago 4
i still perfer a "normal" cube
Carolyn673 2 years ago 5
So do I but in my case a 2x2x2!
Mridrislozada 1 year ago
cool
siy777 2 years ago
the original one is much better. In this one you must change batteries or stay charging it.
TepochaTe 2 years ago 31
amazing :)
benomi 2 years ago
i want one 0.o where can i get it, i also want an Ecube XD which is simmiler but it has buttons instead
darkflameSG 2 years ago
Illuminating!
jillh10 2 years ago
Everyone is a critic... Cool puzzle.
PaperpapaSmurf 2 years ago
this is a crime against puzzles
YouCubeable 2 years ago 3
All I can say is 149.00 is a stupid and way to high for something like
wolf11 2 years ago
its hard to beleive this is real, but theres video proof, so, yeah.
TheBlueUmbreon 2 years ago
This was designed for lazy post 80's children that don't want to catch a cramp in their tiny little delicate hands! The original is by far still the best design!
melloprod 2 years ago 2
Grow up.
Shadow766 2 years ago
I did grow up, that's why I prefer the original design.
melloprod 2 years ago
If you had grown up, you would have the common sense to know that "catching a cramp in their delicate little hands" is a stupid idea. And how is a touch screen lazy? Two supid fucking ideas.
This new one was made because touch screens are the new '"in" thing. You haven't played with this one, so you can't have an opinion.
Shadow766 2 years ago 3
damn you again! what are you a rubikscubeologist or something. Okay i'll solve the whole thing...you're right-i'm wrong-i'm weak-you're strong! okay enough iz enough. I'm done with this post
melloprod 2 years ago
You are damn right I'm right. At least you aren't a complete dumbass.
Shadow766 2 years ago
lol! I feel so compelled to keep responding but I won't! this is absolutely the last post! take care
melloprod 2 years ago
I believe this argument has been logically concluded, but doubtless you will respond to us anyway out of his compulsive desire to have the last word... Ever heard of Occupatio?
captainpiccard 2 years ago
Hang on, I always found it hard to cranck those cubes a round so this one is a breeze, the concept is the same but easier?
jillh10 2 years ago
This puzzle is crap, the original is way better, but your argument is flawed. What do kids do today? Play video games. How many buttons did your 80's Atari had? One, maybe two, plus a stick in the middle. Have you counted the buttons on a PS3 controller?
captainpiccard 2 years ago 2
funny guy looking at a diamond?
spacecat12345 2 years ago
i don't think I like this. I didn't really like the rubik's revolutin either, but it's ok for what it's worth. I agree w/ others , this could never be solved in record time like the original. Mr. Erno Rubik is rolling over in his grave, and he isn't even dead yet! ;0)
xFallenAnjelx 2 years ago
I highly doubt you could solve this cube in under a minute, even with a very expert method. It's overpriced. I could get a collection of: 2x2, 3x3, 4x4, 5x5, 6x6, 7x7 for this price. The noise is annoying. It's probably extremely fragile.
VIDE0GAMEADDICT 2 years ago 4
I WAS interested in possibly buying. I hate the noise that it makes!!! It's as disappointing as the Rubiks Revolution (that was pretty sad)
VIDE0GAMEADDICT 2 years ago 2
The Rubik's Revolution was probably the single most disappointing product EVER made from this company. It was a complete fail.
Solemnwishing 2 years ago 2
I had heard rumors about it, and figured it was an electronic puzzle cube that physically turned, not a toy designed to entertain a toddler. hehe
VIDE0GAMEADDICT 2 years ago
In my opinion, it ruined the Rubik's name, your right, it is designed to entertain a toddler.
Solemnwishing 2 years ago 2
Will be confusing. I'll stick with a normal cube, which I have yet to solve.
KzrrainzYes 2 years ago 38
i agree. id rather it physically moving
loookfrancisison 2 years ago
disgrace to all cubes everywhere!!!
drunkenmunky908 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wanna see something way more awesome than that please check out my videos.
RaymondHamby2424 2 years ago
8x8x8 and up cubes could finally be made using this technology
BSimmons27 2 years ago
They should make one like this but without the black seperations and make it a little bit bigger so it can be a 2x2 and all the other ones including the 8x8x8 all in one. But, I bet it's going to be expensive.
belle31998 2 years ago
Hmmm. Interesting concept. I never though of it that way.
RoC1909 2 years ago
yeah but that takes away from the twisty part of it
it would be way better to have the actually twisty puzzle
livetobox226 2 years ago
Where buy that cube?
TheAir084 2 years ago
that looks just stupid.... a waste of technonogly
imataco95 2 years ago
wow thats gonna be more harder than a ordinary rubix cube.
zimachi 2 years ago 2
Today I just imagine that could invent a TouchCube and.... voila! That just already exist.............=(
mangostain 2 years ago
You can still invent crazy cool cubes like a rubiks cube controlled by the brain completely like the new upcoming game console.
Anantko 2 years ago
Is this cube seriously $150? o_O I could get a real, official cube for $12 at most places and it'll last longer, doesn't require batteries and can turn faster.
Granted it looks cool, but is there any other reason to get this that makes it different then a standard Rubik's cube?
PkGam 2 years ago
and you cant afford to touch the sides or else it will turn
you have to hold the black edges
bigfootmax 2 years ago
Good point! But that kinda sounds like a disadvantage to me, lol! But that does make it have it's own challenge: Handling.
PkGam 2 years ago
the sides won't work, only the side that faces up will register touches.
it says so on the description.
DuckDESNCON 2 years ago
Ohhh that's what they meant by that. I didn't quite understand that part.
That would make it easier.
PkGam 2 years ago
@PkGam Official rubiks cubes = CRAP! DIY CUBES FTW!!!
LeonardoSasuke 2 years ago
You have a point there, lol! My best cube broke so I tried getting 2 of the same kind hoping for the best(rubik's retooled 2008). They're SO much stiffer out of the box then my old cube... :( Heck, they even feel different from each other! Rubik's riveting is FAR too inconsistent for my liking. It's like playing the slots and hoping for 777, lol! I just can't go back to using stiff cubes, so I got myself 2 white DIYs! :D (Being shipped)
PkGam 2 years ago
this comes out in august. cant wait!!!!
mikeo34 2 years ago
awesome, where did u get it from?
cubefreak217 2 years ago
They've already invented these a while ago...
TheCheeseNugget 2 years ago
it gets sorta confusing so u can
belle31998 2 years ago
ugly
xKrl0Zx 2 years ago
thtz ill lol
luck4fuck 2 years ago
it doesnt look fun. i love the original rubiks
bleach123rocks 2 years ago 2
it doesn't pop =D
Hellopiermy 2 years ago
whats the point???u wont get the same feeling's u have with the original, movable cube...
mixdude21 2 years ago
how much does this cost it is awesome. 8D
superkellerman8D 2 years ago
like $150.00.
how lame.
XxilikesoupxX 2 years ago
$150
TestrisMan 2 years ago
wow. O.O
superkellerman8D 2 years ago
WHY?
mogge75 2 years ago 5
I played with much older electronic versions... They had buttons, not touch screens, though, but I am pretty sure they are older than this one.
jnoort 2 years ago
aww, i can't throw it to the ground anymore!
Ugg... 35 years.. can't solve this touch cube!!
fastzeek 2 years ago
pointless!
ingimusic 2 years ago
Sweet idea but i can think of a lot of problems with the touch sensitive sides
edisnierif 2 years ago
They should call it Fail Cube
UbeefHooked 2 years ago
I can only second that!
snooptube23 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We love your video. Thats why we featured it today on POPTUB. Stop by our channel and check it out!
POPTUB 2 years ago 2
szar
szoponc 2 years ago 2
tényleg az
kpingvin 2 years ago 2
that looks harder thana normal rubiks
tru3m3talh3ad 2 years ago
dang
richardconter 2 years ago
Eh... this is a fail, I'd rather get a regular one.
kmlpops 2 years ago 7
sucks cause the middle box is moving too
Rocky374 2 years ago
moving the middle row is the equivalent of moving the top + bottom in the opposite direction and turning the cube. it technically could* allow for a decrease in the number of moves it takes, depending on how u count, and can be done with a normal rubix cube.
hippymobster 2 years ago
wtf? stupid shit
taufiq1991 2 years ago 2
This is shit (garbage)
riven579 2 years ago 2
looks stupid and confusing TBH "_"
Coyotefreak1 2 years ago
why the hell would you buy this?
addr135 2 years ago
so u dont hafta scramble it?
O_o
idk
hippymobster 2 years ago
awesame! i hope i can buy one.
where can you find them?
burgerfreak327 3 years ago
ehh hate anything made by apple
MachineGuNate 3 years ago
16:9 in 4:3 frame fail.
mnemo70 3 years ago
cool
NET1340 3 years ago
wtf is the point of this... cost alot cheaper to just make a regular one and it wont break. Also a regular one does not require batterys...
bobotea1234 3 years ago 4
OH NO IT BROKE WHEN I DROPPED IT!
sippycupofdoom 3 years ago
You can create this game for iPhone.
akash8m 3 years ago