@IvanderHaisley Just does not work, silicon to silicon bonds are TOO stable so very little further chemistry can occur silicon to arsenic bonds are very weak.
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
@lightandbeautiful "about homosexuality." Regardless of your position on it what has that got to do with the origins of life. Your way off topic. Try another page!
"Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations"-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuits completely altered the education system to suit their evolution agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible.
What makes Dawkin think that the universe is only 14 billion years old. Has it occured to him that the universe has always been there in some form or another. Therefore life has always been there just as matter that makes up the universe as always been there. If he thinks he can explain where life came from then he also has to explain how atoms came into existance as well as life. It has always existed! There's no beginning and there's no end. Its called infinity. No one can really understand it
@MacleanTony Why do people always combine the origin of the universe and the beginning of life on Earth as if they are related. Science has estimated the age of the Universe at 14.5 BY by extrapolating back from the currently expanding observed universe to what they call the Big Bang.
Our Solar system formed 4.5 BY ago and simple life started about 3 BY ago with no significant change until 500 MY. The two are different subjects.
@mtbee9 What is life made from? Stuff. Where did the stuff come from? The big bang. Can you make life without stuff? No. So the two subjects are related.
@1simonmatthews "So the two subjects are related." Agreed in essence. My point was that the 2 are not directly related in that one caused the other. The two are often combined by creationists as if they are cause and effect. There was a10 Billion year gap between the big bang and our solar system being formed! let alone life originating on Earth.
@mtbee9 Maybe that's just how long it takes, or it may have started long before that elsewhere. I personally would bet they are related since everything that's needed to create life started off in the same tiny singularity. It must be a very special explosion with very special ingredients that ends with life. I mean, it couldn't have been just any old crap inside that singularity, could there? It had to be something extremely precise, surely.
@1simonmatthews "Maybe that's just how long it takes" Maybe that is true. Maybe life has started millions of times on different planets around the universe. AstroPhysicists say that the heavy elements can only be produced by large dying stars so life could not have started until after these stars were born and then died.
There is a lot we don't know about the universe yet but we're finding out! I don't see any reason to postulate some creator as that solves nothing, just adds more questions.
@mtbee9 Heavy elements can only be produced by large dying stars, and large dying stars can only be produced by whatever came out of the big bang, so it's still a related subject then.
There is indeed a lot we don't know about the universe yet. "I don't see any reason to postulate some creator as that solves nothing, just adds more questions." Depends on the real objective nature of the universe and how you define creator. Perhaps consciousness creates matter and drives evolution.
@mtbee9 Have you thought that maybe your own ideas are wrong? There are many theories that back up my ideas, written by very intelligent people. Max Planck for one. Was he wrong too? Look up Peter Russell. There's many more. Quantum physics tells us that the reality that we thought we understood is nothing like that. This is fact. What is reality outside of your mind? What does an atom look like? Ironically, it's you who lives in the fantasy world and I'm looking into the REAL reality!
@1simonmatthews "maybe your own ideas are wrong" Of course they may be wrong. Being skeptical and keeping an open mind are very important. However to jump from what we understand and what we have evidence for into fantasy needs some justification otherwise it remains fantasy. While people can dream up ideas and think imaginatively about how things could be, they all remain fiction until we have evidence for them. Same with gods and imagined creators!
@mtbee9 You seem to be ignoring certain aspects of my comments to fit in with your beliefs. What about the questions I posed to you and the evidence I have directed you to? The double slit experiment shows that reality is quite different to that depicted in classical physics. It's a fact that the reality we perceive has an intrinsic relationship with our consciousness and the two cannot be separated. As I said, there's much evidence for this, even if you happen to have ignored it.
@1simonmatthews " The double slit experiment " I don't recall you asking me about this. No matter, Physics is not my subject. I did some quick research on this and it appears to be a physics problem above my knowledge level - but does appear to be pure physics. I don't know if you intend this to be related to your other comments about consciousness or not but I don't see any connection. There are areas of science that are not understood but no reason to cling to fantasy to explain them.
@mtbee9 I never mentioned the double slit experiment, but I did mention quantum physics, and the double slit experiment is a fundamental part of that subject, which most people with an interested in that subject would know about. If you do some research into this subject you will find that it is indeed related to my comments. In fact I recommend that you look into it further because it's a facinating subject and a must for anyone with an interest in the nature of the universe.
@mtbee9 "All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter." - Max Planck, founder of quantum physics. Look up The Measurement Problem. Many known physicists talk about it, including Professor Jim Al Khalili for BBC Horizon. This is far from fantasy.
@1simonmatthews "We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. "
This to me sounds like someone either pandering to the religious crowd or who is trying to fit god into the evidence rather than the other way round. I do not disagree that Planck was a great physicist or that other physics problem exist but it is still a leap of faith or fantasy to imagine a creator of it all. I will however read more but as I said physics is not my main area of interest.
@mtbee9 If you're interested in videos like this then a knowledge of quantum physics is essential, otherwise it's a bit like being interested in the internal combustion engine but having no knowledge of petrol. The way you think of a creator is a little dated, which is why it would be a good idea to do some research into the subject, to bring yourself up-to-date with the latest theories on consciousness and the universe. The evidence is all around, we just need the capacity to understand it.
@1simonmatthews " a knowledge of quantum physics is essential" Not so sure of that. the origin of life is about biology and molecular chemistry not as much about physics as fas as I know.
"The way you think of a creator is a little dated" That may be true but it is how most religious people talk about it, none of whom can explain what their creator is.
"consciousness and the universe" What would you recommend as far a scientific book or paper is concerned that discusses this?
@mtbee9 I see consciousness as one thing that permeates the universe, a fundamental and essential force of the universe that's always been there. Through the evolution of matter it is able to experience the universe in different ways, whether it be a plant, some insect, or human being. The human brain is the latest piece of hardware it utilizes on Earth. It allows consciousness to experience the physical world in a particular way. Without consciousness there would be only unreceived information.
@mtbee9 Actually, thinking about it, without consciousness there may not even be information. It could be that consciousness is producing the information. I can't see how particles would come from nothing, especially since we know that energy cannot be created or destroyed. I believe it's more logical to think that there was nothing physical in the beginning. Then, through boredom lol, it started making up information, which is waves of energy. Space/Time only exists in our/its mind.
@JungleJargon but the RNA doesnt require any outside protein or enzymes, it's older than dna. rna can be it's own ribosome (the r-rna) meaning it can produce it's own proteins. it can replicate by pure chemical means.
if you want to think there's a maker, then you should provide solid valid evidence, not just "gut-feeling" like "The function of most of the most common elements requires a Maker." or you'll just be intellectual dishonest
@itsandbits1 The impossible happening is invalidated by the same mechanism of chance in the preexisting genome that is supposed to order things. It can be disordered much easier than it can be ordered. You need more than billions of years and there hasn't even been a million years living on earth.
With those kinds of odds, you might as well say there is a Maker of all of the functions that hydrogen and most of the most common elements essential to life have being ordered by a preexisting word.
@flywithme2006 well, if the bible said that then there's pretty much to nothing to worry about...since nothing in the bible is ever true and nothing in there can be taken seriously
It is far better to say that you don't know something in answer to questions such as what happened before the big bang, or how exactly life started (Abiogenesis), than to jump to conclusions and simply assert that a invisible magic force or being must have done it.
@eastariel " trying to disprove the existence of stars with a microscope" At least you can rearrange the lenses in the microscope to make a telescope and show that stars are real. There is nothing you can do to prove god is real.
@eastariel "but neither can we prove that He (god) isn't. (real)" neither can you prove the FSM,Russels teapot, fairies, ghosts etc are real, or anything else you can imagine. So where does that leave god - just a figment of everyones imagination, and for those who take their imagination as real - thats called delusion.
I would much rather go with what we can determine is real than simply make things up.
We have freedom of religion in America for a very important reason -- so there won't be any thought police to bully us into not thinking for ourselves.
We all have different experiences, different perceptions. It's hard to see eye-to-eye sometimes because we all see things differently.
@eastariel "We have freedom of religion in America" I totally agree - no thought police and no indoctrination of children with religion would also be good. Most certainly we should keep religion out of schools. All children should be allowed to grow up and then look at the facts with an open mind so they can then make up their own mind.
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
Its funny because as soon as someone says it impossible for something to develop legs or such, i just dismiss them as uneducated and their opinion is invalid no matter what. Its mainly all the Americans which aren't being taught about evolution, glad Australia isn't like that. =D
Topics: The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
or
figure4etc3.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
@CNetherny "It's time to erase the borders, reject all labels, work together, so we can survive, and not get taken out by a rock from space."
Well the borders are gradually disappearing, but the labels, especially religious ones will be around for a long time I fear! The mere fact that religion persuades so many to believe in it's fantasy is the biggest hurdle to the future.
@mtbee9 "Plus the money they do spend on their 'science' seems to go into trying to prove real science wrong!"
Real scientists try to prove real scientists wrong. IDists simply try to make their religious rubbish sound sufficiently scientific to sell to taxpayer-funded schools.
Ask a scientist where the material for the "big bang" came from... they will say we don't know that. Where did the energy come from to create this bang? We don't know. And then when you tell someone you believe in God and they say where did God come from? and you answer i don't know. They act like youre some fool but they do the exact same thing
Are thoughts of a God keeping you awake nights,am I really held accountable ,is Hell real,don't lay awake nights any longer,now available Richard Dawkins can rid you of those pesky ideas about God so you can get back to the things you really enjoy,reviling and partying till all hours of the night,no more thoughts or worry's "The God Delusion" now available at fine bookstores or online at Amazon by Richard Dawkins will bring you relief,warning may cause burning for eternity,$24.95
Listen guys and gals, we non-believers have to accept we are arrogant and don't understand religion. See God loves Christians, he loves them so much that he created them. They are so special that one day they will be with God for eternity. He loves them so much that he will take time away from watching children drown in a tsunami to help them so they can hit homeruns, buy new cars and find parking spaces.We need to start admitting our arrogance as non-believers.
Dawkins/Hichens spent their entire lives dropping arguments that were presented to; and addressed by the Catholic Church 12H years ago. My church needs to do a much, MUCH better job in letting these hacks know that their ingenious concepts have already been noted and debunked. Historically, Dawkins/Hichens pts. aren’t even the challenging ones! It is, however, always entertaining to hear someone argue their own insignificance, while using the significance of their intellect to persuade.
All science manages to do is to demonstrate God creates life to adapt and change, so that life can survive. There is no evidence that life "evolves", as if it magically appears all by itself due to a magical "boogieman" non-designed process. Rather, ALL known evidence demonstrates that life is deliberately designed to adapt and change. Terms "natural", "natural selection", "nature" or, "natural world" demonstrate extreme bias, "creation" and "created world" match the same known evidence.
Some scientists believe life bagan in the ocean from a singular source; this is what Dawkins pretends is "science", even though other scientists have different theories, such as life began in fresh water, in caves, under the earth, in plain dirt, arrived on space rocks and, can begin "wherevere there is a little wetness". The scientific truth is, nobody knows how, where or when life first came to be on earth; the first 800 million years leave no geologic or fossil record. DAWKINS DOESN'T KNOW.
Lol it is kinda funny. As an atheist he believes that the universe was created by accident or a big bang. And when he talks about protein he says that was not an accident at 5:30. If he believes that we are here by accident, how come the protein is not I am confused!
The problem with Creationism is that 1) It is not science 2) they offer no alternative viable theories on the subject 3) All they do is point to controversy in the field of evolutionary biology 4) it will never, ever, be considered a real field of study in a university worth of its name 5) its supporters are usually one of the following: ignorant, too scared to let go of their religious beliefs, brain-washed, or simply plain crazy.
@bersa888 The problem with atheism is 1) It's not based on evidence and fundamentally, non-scientific. 2) It offers no alternative and pretends it doesn't have to; 3) It pretends motion can arise from non-motion, intelligence from non-intelligence, conscious awareness from non-conscious stuff, etc. Atheists are among the most superstitious of all humans, contradicting ALL known evidence. First there is evidence, then there is science. Claiming to "disbelieve" in God is worthless superstition.
@bersa888 The universe is evidence for God, where is your evidence for motion arising from non-motion, intelligence from non-intelligence, conscious awareness from non-conscious stuff. What do you have to offer that is a BETTER explanation that Jesus already gave us; "Before Abraham was I AM". The explanation of Jesus satisfies origins, whereas Dawkins doesn't seem to know his ass from a black hole in the ground, remaining a living example of why a biker would never send their kids to Oxford.
@bersa888 The universe is evidence of God. What there is "solid" evidence of, is that atheism is represents a greater superstition than all other superstitions combined. To pretend there is no God is to pretend that the human brain and my computer, my house and everything else human beings create, magically appeared all by themselves. Atheist = believer in magic.
@richardaberdeen "The universe is evidence" That part is right. Only you have to show how it is evidence of a god you can't just claim it and say it's true!
"atheism is .. a greater superstition" LOL How is it a superstition to NOT believe in unprovable claims from others! Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence! Atheism is the default position. You have to show your god is real!
As for magic, LOL, you're the one claiming magic - an invisible being doing things with no evidence!
@bersa888 Sorry, I don't believe in magically appearing universes, magically appearing intelligence from non-intelligence, magically appearing laws of physics, magically appearing processes, magically appearing santa clauses, tooth faires, spaghetti monsters and magically appearing little green men from Mars like Hitchens. Sorry, atheism requires way too much blind faith for me to believe. Atheism = Total Bullshit.
@richardaberdeen On a serious note: You claim the universe was poofed into existence by god. Science says it was the big bang. You cannot prove where god came from and science doesn't know what happened before the big bang. It appears that these 2 sides are complementary, right? No they're not. Science is all about finding out what we can, which is why we now know about trillions of galaxies, DNA, and much more.
Religion is all about blindly believing in old mythological stories! No contest.
@HambleThornberry God, by definition, is the Creator of the universe; God has been defined in this manner by intelligent people from Socrates and the Greeks forward, as well as by many far sooner than that. Thus, your statement only demonstrates what great liars atheists are, pretending that the universe magically appeared all by itself, wthout any brains behind it.
@HambleThornberry Regardless of what you call the Creator, it is correct to say that the Creator created the universe. That is what creator's do. And, regardless of how much you pretend the Creator doesn't exist, he goes right on existing anyway, just as regardless of whether you say the earth is in the shape of a sphere, cube or triangle, the shape of the earth remains the same. Grow up and stop embracing worthless superstition.
Why would the universe need a creator? You're making assertions based on bronze age mythology. The universe does not need a creator. There is no 'proof' of a creator, nor is there one that is needed to create the cosmos.
@HambleThornberry Yeah right, my computer just magically appeared all by itself, nothing needs a creator, you are absolutely right, after all, you have managed to crawl outside the universe, look around, up and down and then, crawl back in, so you can assure us there is no God. Yeah, sure, as if you would know.
I never said that nothing needs a creator. You get pre-existing materials and make a 'new' formation of particles and molecules. You still have not provided evidence for a creator. All you're doing is asserting time and time again. Primitive minds, how they enthrall me is stupendous(good and bad).
Who says magic has anything to do about it? The laws of the universe is magic? Atheist don't beleive in magic. Atheism doesn't even have a stand on the issue of how the universe began. Atheism is a claim that no Gods exist. Thus, i can claim that YOU(not your kind) are misleading and not accurate in any of your statements.
@HambleThornberry Laws and processes don't magically exist unto themselves, any more than test questions for students at Oxford University, magically exist without some self-contradicting professor inventing them, however absurd and baseless such questions may be. Try going back to elementary school and starting over.
Here we go. We know that the laws of the universe exist, and they do not need a god to exist(insufficient evidence in a Gods' favor). Read the definition of magic, think back two years ago when you were in 1st grade. Really try to use your frontal cortex for once. Because cosmology/science reaserches have yet to give the answer to 'why' laws are the way they are, you assume that there must be a creator of some sort? Bronze age mythology at its finest i must say.
@HambleThornberry There is no way of knowing if there is any such thing as a universal law and, some scientists question whether or not there is. However, there is overwhelming evidence that processes cannot exist unto themselves. First there is a universe, then there is life and then there is what science calls evolution. There is no evidence whatsoever, that evolution exists unto itself or, that gravity, light, motion or anything else we can observe, exists unto itself.
There is no way of knowing? Including that we can replicate experiments in different locations with different variables and constants? Where is this evidence that proves processes cannot exist unto themselves?
Saying to yourself that laws cannot exist unto themselves does not mean that a universe needs a creator. Some laws are constant, with or without a universe. Quantum fluctuations are a must. We don't know WHY there are fluctuations at plank scales, but we know they do occur. You're just cramming your belief in a deity into that why part. Just like in history when god did everything until research was made and God was taken out. Once we answer why, no more God(s) will be needed
@HambleThornberry If there is no universe, there are no observable laws, there is no such thing as "flutuations at plank scales", no such thing as Einstein's brain or any science theory and thus, there are no such thing as laws of any kind. You can't prove there is any such thing as a "universal" law. It is irrational to pretend that evolution can exist unto itself. First universe, then life, then evolution. There is no evidence any law, process or rule can exist unto itself. Grow up !!!
@HambleThornberry No one knows if universal laws exist. Several scientists question their existence, including a leading Princeton physicist. It is impossible to know if universal laws exist, unless you were to travel to every point in the universe and test them. Atheists often claim belief in God is "untestable", yet they assume all manner of bullshit that can't possibly be tested in a trillion years. Several physicists seriously question if the speed of light is constant, for example.
I must admit, the board of education has failed you. Seems like their 'new' style of training teachers how to teach has not gotten through your thick skull. You're so deluded by your pertinacious beliefs you must inexorably come to the conclusion that the cosmos needs a creator.
@HambleThornberry No, you are so deluded, that you pretend magic = science. Your responses demonstrate a severe lack of quality education. Educated people are well aware that the existence of "universal" laws is neither proven or provable. There are theories coming out of Princeton, as we speak, that seriously challenge the existence of universal laws, demonstrating that such assumed laws change as bodies move through space. This is probably over your head, but that wouldn't surprise me.
Now i know you're a troll. Well, i'll play along. You are amusing me eitherway. People pretending to have a higher education than the 'rest' is always amusing.
Actually, there are universal laws, according to our known universe and beyond. But, they break down at certain temperatures. Some even coalesce(Electromagnetism, the strong, and weak forces) at high enough temperatures. Do you have a source of these so called 'theories' coming out of Princeton?
@HambleThornberry Oh, I see. Since I have demonstraed over and over and over again, that your positions have no foundation in evidence, now you are questioning my educational background? Yeah, that's really convincing.
Please, i alway encourage youth to read. Start reading up on quantum mechanics. It may be a big word for your likings but it will be worth the reseach.
@HambleThornberry First there is universe, then there are people, then there is a term "quantum mechanics" and, various theories. Your position is plainly wrong, as are the positions of every atheist. It is irrational to pretend that any law, theory, idea or process can exist unto itself, without any brains behind it. The ONLY known rational explanation for the observable reality is "Before Abraham was, I AM". When you have a BETTER explanation, you be sure and let God know.
@bersa All science manages to do is to demonstrate God creates life to adapt and change, so that life can survive. There is no evidence that life "evolves", as if it magically appears all by itself due to a magical "boogieman" non-designed process. Rather, ALL known evidence demonstrates that life is deliberately designed to adapt and change. Terms "natural", "natural selection", "nature" or, "natural world" demonstrate extreme bias, "creation" and "created world" match the same known evidence.
CHRISTIANITY AND THE TRUTH OF THE BIBLE IS NOT GONE AND WILL NEVER BE AS THIS IS WORD OF GOD THE CREATOR OF EVERYTHING AND NOBODY CREATED AS PERFECT BOOK AS THE BIBLE EVER!!! A FACT THAT YOU ARE LOOKING FOR THE TRUTH AND UNIVERSAL ANSWERS MAKES YOU MORE THAN ONLY SOME ANIMAL OR EFFECT OF COINCIDENT AND EVOLUTION. ONLY CHRISTIANITY PROTECT THE LIFE!
FAITH IS A GIFT SO ASK GOD- HOLY SPIRIT FOR IT IF YOU WANT AND GET READY FOR BIG EVENT-GREAT WARNING SOON
CHRISTIANITY AND THE TRUTH OF THE BIBLE IS NOT GONE AND WILL NEVER BE AS THIS IS WORD OF GOD THE CREATOR OF EVERYTHING AND NOBODY CREATED AS PERFECT BOOK AS THE BIBLE EVER A FACT THAT YOU ARE LOOKING FOR THE TRUTH AND UNIVERSAL ANSWERS MAKES YOU MORE THAN ONLY SOME ANIMAL OR EFFECT OF COINCIDENT AND EVOLUTION. ONLY CHRISTIANITY PROTECT THE LIFE
@bersa888 The problem with atheism is 1) It is not science; 2) They offer no alternative theory; 3) All they point to is controversy, have no evidence for magically appearing brainless universes; 5) Will NEVER be rational whatsoever, let alone a "real "field" of study, other than way out in right field; 5) It's supporters are plainly ignorant liars, afraid of their own Momma's shadows, plainly brainwashed and simply crazy beyond all measure. Gee, wonder why Jesus hated hypocrisy !!!
@richardaberdeen : Strange... I agree with you :-) Atheism is NOT a science; we cannot and don't offer any alternative theory (science does that); we have no conclusive or good evidence for a brainless evidence (science does, read and learn). BUT we are rational - it goes with being a skeptic. Finally, I got 22 thumbs up and you didn't :-). On the other hand, you never had or never will have a shred of evidence for anything. The case for the existence elves is much stronger - and cuter ;-)
"To understand the purpose of you having free will, you have to understand catholic faith". You ask: "Why?". Do you really ask? Of course, not. You deceive yourself, or rather devil is deceiving you and so many others like you. He gave you false sense of sureness i obviousness. With that you looks like same schoolboy or parrot.Rather being idiot, please admit your lack of true knowledge and maturity about objective reality.God gave you free will, you could love God with all your heart, mind...
"To understand the purpose of you having good will, you have to understand catholic faith". You ask: "Why?". Do you really ask? Of course, not. You deceive yourself, or rather devil is deceiving you and so many others like you. He gave you false sense of sureness i obviousness. With that you looks like same schoolboy or parrot.Rather being idiot, please admit your lack of true knowledge and maturity about objective reality.God gave you free will, you could love God with all your heart, mind...
@akwinata1 "admit your lack of true knowledge and maturity about objective reality."
Nope certainly will not. I have a very good understanding of objective reality.
Now when it comes to believing in invisible, unknown, supposedly all powerful beings for which there is absolutely no evidence then it is certainly YOU that does not have a grasp on reality!
I'm not deceived by the devil because that is another one of your made up creatures for which there is no evidence. You are truly brainwashed.
"To understand the purpose of you having good will, you have to understand catholic faith". You ask: "Why?". Do you really ask? Of course, not. You deceive yourself, or rather devil is deceiving you and so many others like you. He gave you false sense of sureness i obviousness. With that you looks like same schoolboy or parrot.Rather being idiot, please admit your lack of true knowledge and maturity about objective reality.God gave you free will, you could love God with all your heart, mind...
Sarah Palin is good woman and catholic. Everybody who doesn`t like her is sick.
Catholic faith is true.
Free will is given to you to use it, but mind is given to you and God`s revelation that you use your free will for purpose for which free will was given for you.
To understand the purpose of you having good will, you have to understand catholic faith. But first thing to understand it is to know thai catholic faith is true. Second is to understand all truths of faith revealed by God as such.
@akwinata1 "To understand the purpose of you having good will, you have to understand catholic faith"
Why? I am perfectly capable of having good will without believing in your catholic fairy stories. If you need to believe the delusion to have good will - fine - go ahead. I don't need it.
Archapmangcmg is idiot, I don`t have to proof it, because it is obvious from his writing. Faith is human answer, with help of God, on God`s revelation so in what we catholics believe has authority of God. Faith is proofed by The Word of God, Jesus Christ. Nobody needs any more proofs, because This Proof is infinitely stronger than any human natural proof.The truth is: you have no idea about catholic faith, not because you are too thick, but too wicked to be obedient to God, your Creator, Saviour
God exists and He proved it in two ways. One is God`s creation, which tells about its Creator, by its very existence and by its content and wonderful order. Second is God`s revelation by Jesus Christ. But I have good and bad news for you, it depends on your approach. What God proved for you, you have to understand. What capacity of your mind do you have available? Very limited indeed.To understand second way of God`s proof you will need faith, I mean catholic faith,it is God`s grace to have it.
@akwinata1 Faith is not proof, and your claim that it allows understanding is both wrong on the face of it, and disproved by the Catholics that become atheists. As for using the universe as proof of God, laughably wrong. All the universe looks natural, just as it would without any gods. The obvious answer is that without evidence in favour of a god, we shouldn't believe in any gods.
Your burden is still as weighty, you've not done anything to meet it.
i just had a vision a original thought: a miracle, the outer is the source not the inner just trust me factor that in for everything it all makes sense. think about it.
All atheists are like Dawkins idiots. Reason can prove God is. Full stop. Atheists have weak heads, they can`t think properly. They don`t use reason rather than use it. That is the reason why they are so narrow minded, they are blind, they can`t see reality. Also as a punishment they are too stupid to believe God. They are His creation, yet they think they have reason greater than God and He has nothing to say to them. How stupid and wicked? Dawkins is not only idiot, but wicked. And for what?
@carlosewm No, you seem to believe the univese can exist without any brains behind it. It is up to you to prove that. It is rational and logical to conclude a human brain needs a designer, just like it would be entirely rational and logical to conclude my computer needs a designer, even if someonewas came from another planet and had never previously seen a computer. The positions of atheists are total bullshit. Atheism should be called what it clearly is, belief in gross superstition.
@richardaberdeen I never said that, the current knowledge doesn't find any evidence for such creator, in fact, what it finds reinforces the idea that life has evolved over hundreds of millions of years, not some magic.
So I must prove the idea that YOU assert that I have (so that you can rebuke it and make yours look better) in order for your idea to be absurd?
You're got it wrong, it's up to you to prove creation, not me to disprove it.
@carlosew The time of universal creation only demonstrates what the Bible says, that God is an eternal Creator who has created in the past, is creating in the present and, will create long into the future. That is what ALL of the known evidence very clearly demonstrates. There is no evidence whatsoever, that "evolution" can magically exist unto itself. First there is a universe, then there is life, then there is evolution. There is no evidence that first there is evolution and, then life.
@richardaberdeen Quit wasting my time, you're not convincing me of your beliefs, you can barely even convince yourself of them (and you know it).
I don't see why you mention evolution, it has nothing to do with biogenesis, neither creation.
Create unto itself?
The bible is a collection of fairy tales influenced by older mythologies, what's written there is mostly figurative language, and even if it wasn't, it's 2000+ years old, I'll stick with science books.
@carlosewm I'm not trying to convince you of my beliefs. I am responding for others who read this forum, so they can easily see what great liars atheists are.
@richardaberdeen So you do believe stereotyping makes sense to any person of good critical thinking?
Unless you can prove all atheists are liars, then you're just inventing excuses for the cost of your image to the sight of any reasonable person.
I'm really not interested in what you believe, but in what you know, and knowledge is what you seem to be lacking in the areas you tried (and failed) to make valid points about, but don't blame yourself, most people do.
@carlosewm You are the one who brought up evolution, when you pretended that because evolution has existed for a long time, this somehow proves there is no God. This is basic atheist bullshit 1-A. The time of creation clearly demonstrates there is a God. An Eternal Creator has all of the time in the world and far more, to create. Your position is total nonsense--there is no evidence for magically appearing universes filled with finite beings of intelligence.
@richardaberdeen I don't see what you understand as "all of the known evidence" as the bible is not exactly evidence for anything other than that human culture can invent a vast amount of fairy tales as a form of moral teachings.
Your idea asserts that there is need for creation, as explained before, there's no evidence that there is this need.
You can't really prove your belief to be right (and you know it), i'm not trying to force my beliefs on other people, what about you?
@carlosewm I didn't say the Bible is the evidence. The universe speaks for God; that is what ALL of the evidence demonstrates, the universal evidence. Stop twisting my words and worse, twisting the obvious truth.
@richardaberdeen Atheism is superstition? Where? Do you even know what superstition is?
Is the absence of belief (which doesn't imply the negation of the existence) on one or more gods (atheism) superstitious in any way at all? It's as foolish as saying theism is superstitious, but you didn't see it (or didn't want to?..).
Superstition is the belief that you can manipulate cause and effect through supernatural means.
I'll give you an example of superstition: Prayer.
@carlosewm To pretend that a universe filled with finite beings of intelligence can magically appear without any Supreme Intelligence, represents a far greater superstition, than all of the rest of human superstitions combined. Who the hell are you trying to kid ? ? ?
@richardaberdeen "To pretend that a universe filled (Huh?) with finite beings of intelligence can magically appear (HUh?) without any Supreme Intelligence"
First how do you know the world is 'filled' with beings? We have not discovered any other life than on Earth so far.
What is with 'magically appeared'? That is what religious people claim. There is no magic involved with abiogenesis or Evolution.
As for superstition - None required - just evidence and logic and a desire to find the truth!
@GodisTruthseekTruth Evolution didn't 'bring forth' all life. That's Abiogenesis.
Run along, ignorant child, unless you're willing to learn. If you can't even get your objection targeted at the right theory, how can you ever hope to be right!
And the new animal was pleased to be with Adam and Eve and he wagged his tail.
And Adam said, 'Lord, I have already named all the animals in the Kingdom and I cannot think of a name for this new animal.'
And God said, 'I have created this new animal to be a reflection of my love for you, his name will be a reflection of my own name, and you will call him DOG.'
God even let us tinker with our toy He gave us ,dog breeding
@Birdinthehand1000 Conscious energy would take on the biological form, we are what we eat, if we are a part of the universe beyond our imaginations then its not something we can explain very easily, but this would be related to the facts of nature, what would the universe be if we were not the eyes of God itself ? Would the universe exist if it was not seen by consciousness ? The fact that we exist is simply a miracle in itself,
"The greatest of 'Black Holes' are NOT found in the outer reaches of a vast and glorious universe. No,no,no! They are found, most interestingly enough and rather pleasantly I might add, in the bus station's men's rooms of our wonderful inner cities."
@kitchenaut Yet within biodiversity, we see entropy. We don't see species evolving but rather wearing away and disappearing. So, entropy DOES apply to "emerging" species. Look at humans: are we evolving or wearing away? Getting stronger or genetically weaker? The simple fact that this planet is losing species defies evolution. A dominant species (like man) will always eliminate weaker species. Survival of the stronger implies disappearance of the weaker.
A BRILLIANT MAN!
I got depressed today by hearing Hitchens died. I'll be equally as deprssed when Dawkins eventually exits.
Domzdream 1 month ago 3
@Domzdream oh man u exaggerate so much
esraretin 4 weeks ago
@esraretin
I do? how's that?
Domzdream 3 weeks ago
@Domzdream wow i didnt expect this
esraretin 3 weeks ago
@williambrazzers If I had to pick five people to take a s**t on (Dead or living) Richard Dawkins would be 1 of them.
philackey 1 month ago
@philackey Go pray.......
RockAustinDXtakerRk0 1 month ago in playlist More videos from PiroNiro
Just posting a comment so there's one that isn't a response
weefeatures 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@weefeatures "Just posting a comment so there's one that isn't a response"
But your comment is a response to the video. If you don't want to make a response - don't comment at al!
mtbee9 2 months ago
@weefeatures this is to cancel you out
manonthemount 2 months ago
@manonthemount it doesn't cancel my original comment out, it's still not a response :) yours is :D
weefeatures 2 months ago
in the DNA chain .,.. replace carbon with silicon and replace phosphorus with arsenic and poof ... ALIEN !!!
IvanderHaisley 2 months ago
@IvanderHaisley Just does not work, silicon to silicon bonds are TOO stable so very little further chemistry can occur silicon to arsenic bonds are very weak.
pcpsyche 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 3 months ago
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 4 months ago
@lightandbeautiful "about homosexuality." Regardless of your position on it what has that got to do with the origins of life. Your way off topic. Try another page!
mtbee9 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations"-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuits completely altered the education system to suit their evolution agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible.
SpencerBenedict2nd 4 months ago
What makes Dawkin think that the universe is only 14 billion years old. Has it occured to him that the universe has always been there in some form or another. Therefore life has always been there just as matter that makes up the universe as always been there. If he thinks he can explain where life came from then he also has to explain how atoms came into existance as well as life. It has always existed! There's no beginning and there's no end. Its called infinity. No one can really understand it
MacleanTony 4 months ago
@MacleanTony Why do people always combine the origin of the universe and the beginning of life on Earth as if they are related. Science has estimated the age of the Universe at 14.5 BY by extrapolating back from the currently expanding observed universe to what they call the Big Bang.
Our Solar system formed 4.5 BY ago and simple life started about 3 BY ago with no significant change until 500 MY. The two are different subjects.
mtbee9 4 months ago
@mtbee9 What is life made from? Stuff. Where did the stuff come from? The big bang. Can you make life without stuff? No. So the two subjects are related.
1simonmatthews 3 months ago
@1simonmatthews "So the two subjects are related." Agreed in essence. My point was that the 2 are not directly related in that one caused the other. The two are often combined by creationists as if they are cause and effect. There was a10 Billion year gap between the big bang and our solar system being formed! let alone life originating on Earth.
mtbee9 3 months ago
@mtbee9 Maybe that's just how long it takes, or it may have started long before that elsewhere. I personally would bet they are related since everything that's needed to create life started off in the same tiny singularity. It must be a very special explosion with very special ingredients that ends with life. I mean, it couldn't have been just any old crap inside that singularity, could there? It had to be something extremely precise, surely.
1simonmatthews 3 months ago
@1simonmatthews "Maybe that's just how long it takes" Maybe that is true. Maybe life has started millions of times on different planets around the universe. AstroPhysicists say that the heavy elements can only be produced by large dying stars so life could not have started until after these stars were born and then died.
There is a lot we don't know about the universe yet but we're finding out! I don't see any reason to postulate some creator as that solves nothing, just adds more questions.
mtbee9 3 months ago
@mtbee9 Heavy elements can only be produced by large dying stars, and large dying stars can only be produced by whatever came out of the big bang, so it's still a related subject then.
There is indeed a lot we don't know about the universe yet. "I don't see any reason to postulate some creator as that solves nothing, just adds more questions." Depends on the real objective nature of the universe and how you define creator. Perhaps consciousness creates matter and drives evolution.
1simonmatthews 3 months ago
@1simonmatthews "Perhaps consciousness creates matter and drives evolution."
"Through the evolution of matter"
"It could be that consciousness is producing the information.
There is fantasy and there is reality. You have obviously chosen fantasy. Good luck with that!
mtbee9 3 months ago
@mtbee9 Have you thought that maybe your own ideas are wrong? There are many theories that back up my ideas, written by very intelligent people. Max Planck for one. Was he wrong too? Look up Peter Russell. There's many more. Quantum physics tells us that the reality that we thought we understood is nothing like that. This is fact. What is reality outside of your mind? What does an atom look like? Ironically, it's you who lives in the fantasy world and I'm looking into the REAL reality!
1simonmatthews 3 months ago
@1simonmatthews "maybe your own ideas are wrong" Of course they may be wrong. Being skeptical and keeping an open mind are very important. However to jump from what we understand and what we have evidence for into fantasy needs some justification otherwise it remains fantasy. While people can dream up ideas and think imaginatively about how things could be, they all remain fiction until we have evidence for them. Same with gods and imagined creators!
mtbee9 3 months ago
@mtbee9 You seem to be ignoring certain aspects of my comments to fit in with your beliefs. What about the questions I posed to you and the evidence I have directed you to? The double slit experiment shows that reality is quite different to that depicted in classical physics. It's a fact that the reality we perceive has an intrinsic relationship with our consciousness and the two cannot be separated. As I said, there's much evidence for this, even if you happen to have ignored it.
1simonmatthews 3 months ago
@1simonmatthews " The double slit experiment " I don't recall you asking me about this. No matter, Physics is not my subject. I did some quick research on this and it appears to be a physics problem above my knowledge level - but does appear to be pure physics. I don't know if you intend this to be related to your other comments about consciousness or not but I don't see any connection. There are areas of science that are not understood but no reason to cling to fantasy to explain them.
mtbee9 3 months ago
@mtbee9 I never mentioned the double slit experiment, but I did mention quantum physics, and the double slit experiment is a fundamental part of that subject, which most people with an interested in that subject would know about. If you do some research into this subject you will find that it is indeed related to my comments. In fact I recommend that you look into it further because it's a facinating subject and a must for anyone with an interest in the nature of the universe.
1simonmatthews 3 months ago
@mtbee9 "All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter." - Max Planck, founder of quantum physics. Look up The Measurement Problem. Many known physicists talk about it, including Professor Jim Al Khalili for BBC Horizon. This is far from fantasy.
1simonmatthews 3 months ago
@1simonmatthews "We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. "
This to me sounds like someone either pandering to the religious crowd or who is trying to fit god into the evidence rather than the other way round. I do not disagree that Planck was a great physicist or that other physics problem exist but it is still a leap of faith or fantasy to imagine a creator of it all. I will however read more but as I said physics is not my main area of interest.
mtbee9 3 months ago
@mtbee9 If you're interested in videos like this then a knowledge of quantum physics is essential, otherwise it's a bit like being interested in the internal combustion engine but having no knowledge of petrol. The way you think of a creator is a little dated, which is why it would be a good idea to do some research into the subject, to bring yourself up-to-date with the latest theories on consciousness and the universe. The evidence is all around, we just need the capacity to understand it.
1simonmatthews 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1simonmatthews " a knowledge of quantum physics is essential" Not so sure of that. the origin of life is about biology and molecular chemistry not as much about physics as fas as I know.
"The way you think of a creator is a little dated" That may be true but it is how most religious people talk about it, none of whom can explain what their creator is.
"consciousness and the universe" What would you recommend as far a scientific book or paper is concerned that discusses this?
mtbee9 3 months ago
@mtbee9 I see consciousness as one thing that permeates the universe, a fundamental and essential force of the universe that's always been there. Through the evolution of matter it is able to experience the universe in different ways, whether it be a plant, some insect, or human being. The human brain is the latest piece of hardware it utilizes on Earth. It allows consciousness to experience the physical world in a particular way. Without consciousness there would be only unreceived information.
1simonmatthews 3 months ago
@mtbee9 Actually, thinking about it, without consciousness there may not even be information. It could be that consciousness is producing the information. I can't see how particles would come from nothing, especially since we know that energy cannot be created or destroyed. I believe it's more logical to think that there was nothing physical in the beginning. Then, through boredom lol, it started making up information, which is waves of energy. Space/Time only exists in our/its mind.
1simonmatthews 3 months ago
You would think aliens are interesting.
Proteins consist of enzymes and result in 3D structure when they are folded properly.
DNA needs proteins to exist and proteins need DNA to exist.
Order does not preceed design. Improbable (impossible) things don't just happen.
The function of most of the most common elements requires a Maker.
watch?v=qZev7hb40uk
JungleJargon 4 months ago
@JungleJargon but the RNA doesnt require any outside protein or enzymes, it's older than dna. rna can be it's own ribosome (the r-rna) meaning it can produce it's own proteins. it can replicate by pure chemical means.
if you want to think there's a maker, then you should provide solid valid evidence, not just "gut-feeling" like "The function of most of the most common elements requires a Maker." or you'll just be intellectual dishonest
72dew 4 months ago
@JungleJargon
given enough time even the impossible happens
itsandbits1 3 months ago
@itsandbits1 The impossible happening is invalidated by the same mechanism of chance in the preexisting genome that is supposed to order things. It can be disordered much easier than it can be ordered. You need more than billions of years and there hasn't even been a million years living on earth.
With those kinds of odds, you might as well say there is a Maker of all of the functions that hydrogen and most of the most common elements essential to life have being ordered by a preexisting word.
JungleJargon 3 months ago
@JungleJargon
the name says it all
itsandbits1 3 months ago
like a married bachelor?
guch0902 3 months ago
Mutations do not account for the origins of anything because they do not order anything.
There is observable evidence that we have a Maker.
...you little green men believer.
watch?v=qZev7hb40uk
JungleJargon 4 months ago
Mutations do not order anything so they do not account for the origins of anything.
Mutations also cannot order any of the chemicals. That is just absurd.
watch?v=qZev7hb40uk
JungleJargon 4 months ago
the end is comming closer because as the bible says there will be ones that try to prove God wrong....
flywithme2006 4 months ago
@flywithme2006 well, if the bible said that then there's pretty much to nothing to worry about...since nothing in the bible is ever true and nothing in there can be taken seriously
72dew 4 months ago
It is far better to say that you don't know something in answer to questions such as what happened before the big bang, or how exactly life started (Abiogenesis), than to jump to conclusions and simply assert that a invisible magic force or being must have done it.
mtbee9 4 months ago
Richard Dawkins is trying to disprove God through deductive logic.
That's like trying to disprove the existence of stars with a microscope.
eastariel 4 months ago
@eastariel " trying to disprove the existence of stars with a microscope" At least you can rearrange the lenses in the microscope to make a telescope and show that stars are real. There is nothing you can do to prove god is real.
mtbee9 4 months ago
@mtbee9
Good point. Obviously, the metaphor has limits.
So maybe we can't prove that God is real, but neither can we prove that He isn't.
eastariel 4 months ago
@eastariel "but neither can we prove that He (god) isn't. (real)" neither can you prove the FSM,Russels teapot, fairies, ghosts etc are real, or anything else you can imagine. So where does that leave god - just a figment of everyones imagination, and for those who take their imagination as real - thats called delusion.
I would much rather go with what we can determine is real than simply make things up.
mtbee9 4 months ago
@mtbee9
We have freedom of religion in America for a very important reason -- so there won't be any thought police to bully us into not thinking for ourselves.
We all have different experiences, different perceptions. It's hard to see eye-to-eye sometimes because we all see things differently.
eastariel 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@eastariel "We have freedom of religion in America" I totally agree - no thought police and no indoctrination of children with religion would also be good. Most certainly we should keep religion out of schools. All children should be allowed to grow up and then look at the facts with an open mind so they can then make up their own mind.
mtbee9 4 months ago
the problem with creationism is that **it doesn't explain ugly ties, among other things
lotorobly 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lotorobly "the problem with creationism is that **it doesn't explain ugly ties, among other things"
Oh but it does - it's all the work of the devil!!
mtbee9 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 5 months ago
Its funny because as soon as someone says it impossible for something to develop legs or such, i just dismiss them as uneducated and their opinion is invalid no matter what. Its mainly all the Americans which aren't being taught about evolution, glad Australia isn't like that. =D
EliteZodiac92 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
or
figure4etc3.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
TheServiceWeb 5 months ago
@CNetherny "It's time to erase the borders, reject all labels, work together, so we can survive, and not get taken out by a rock from space."
Well the borders are gradually disappearing, but the labels, especially religious ones will be around for a long time I fear! The mere fact that religion persuades so many to believe in it's fantasy is the biggest hurdle to the future.
mtbee9 6 months ago
@CNetherny "They won't put billions into research, because they know it is not true."
Well said! Plus the money they do spend on their 'science' seems to go into trying to prove real science wrong!
mtbee9 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mtbee9 "Plus the money they do spend on their 'science' seems to go into trying to prove real science wrong!"
Real scientists try to prove real scientists wrong. IDists simply try to make their religious rubbish sound sufficiently scientific to sell to taxpayer-funded schools.
HitfulVids 5 months ago
Ask a scientist where the material for the "big bang" came from... they will say we don't know that. Where did the energy come from to create this bang? We don't know. And then when you tell someone you believe in God and they say where did God come from? and you answer i don't know. They act like youre some fool but they do the exact same thing
kylemix93 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are thoughts of a God keeping you awake nights,am I really held accountable ,is Hell real,don't lay awake nights any longer,now available Richard Dawkins can rid you of those pesky ideas about God so you can get back to the things you really enjoy,reviling and partying till all hours of the night,no more thoughts or worry's "The God Delusion" now available at fine bookstores or online at Amazon by Richard Dawkins will bring you relief,warning may cause burning for eternity,$24.95
majorl311 6 months ago
This guy is amazing, I wish my biology teacher in school was like this guy.
SeanACampbell 7 months ago
Aliens in science fiction are humanoid not because the imagination is limited, but because television and movie budgets are limited.
Xerock 7 months ago
Listen guys and gals, we non-believers have to accept we are arrogant and don't understand religion. See God loves Christians, he loves them so much that he created them. They are so special that one day they will be with God for eternity. He loves them so much that he will take time away from watching children drown in a tsunami to help them so they can hit homeruns, buy new cars and find parking spaces.We need to start admitting our arrogance as non-believers.
torontoBluejays87 7 months ago
@torontoBluejays87 "They are so special that one day they will be with God for eternity "
I was hoping that they would all have disappeared with the rapture - that would have solved the population, food and energy crisis in one go!
mtbee9 7 months ago
I wonder if the key to these first two questions have something to do with viruses.
killer3596 7 months ago
Dawkins/Hichens spent their entire lives dropping arguments that were presented to; and addressed by the Catholic Church 12H years ago. My church needs to do a much, MUCH better job in letting these hacks know that their ingenious concepts have already been noted and debunked. Historically, Dawkins/Hichens pts. aren’t even the challenging ones! It is, however, always entertaining to hear someone argue their own insignificance, while using the significance of their intellect to persuade.
mdstalla 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mdstalla "arguments that were presented to; and addressed by the Catholic Church 12H years ago."
Really then you won't mind sharing them with us will you - or just give us a link to these answers that you know about that nobody else does!
mtbee9 7 months ago
All science manages to do is to demonstrate God creates life to adapt and change, so that life can survive. There is no evidence that life "evolves", as if it magically appears all by itself due to a magical "boogieman" non-designed process. Rather, ALL known evidence demonstrates that life is deliberately designed to adapt and change. Terms "natural", "natural selection", "nature" or, "natural world" demonstrate extreme bias, "creation" and "created world" match the same known evidence.
richardaberdeen 7 months ago
Some scientists believe life bagan in the ocean from a singular source; this is what Dawkins pretends is "science", even though other scientists have different theories, such as life began in fresh water, in caves, under the earth, in plain dirt, arrived on space rocks and, can begin "wherevere there is a little wetness". The scientific truth is, nobody knows how, where or when life first came to be on earth; the first 800 million years leave no geologic or fossil record. DAWKINS DOESN'T KNOW.
richardaberdeen 7 months ago
Ooh Ooh, we make things, who make us, ooh ooh? Man make things here, big man in sky make us, ooh ooh.
jaykulls 7 months ago
@jaykulls "who make us, ooh ooh?"
Why evolution of course. Everybody knows that. Whoo Hoo!
mtbee9 7 months ago
@mtbee9 It's meant to be like a dumb cave man.
jaykulls 7 months ago
@jaykulls OK Wasn't sure what you meant! Got it!
mtbee9 7 months ago
Lol it is kinda funny. As an atheist he believes that the universe was created by accident or a big bang. And when he talks about protein he says that was not an accident at 5:30. If he believes that we are here by accident, how come the protein is not I am confused!
KSAMonopoly 7 months ago
The problem with Creationism is that 1) It is not science 2) they offer no alternative viable theories on the subject 3) All they do is point to controversy in the field of evolutionary biology 4) it will never, ever, be considered a real field of study in a university worth of its name 5) its supporters are usually one of the following: ignorant, too scared to let go of their religious beliefs, brain-washed, or simply plain crazy.
bersa888 7 months ago 25
@bersa888 The problem with atheism is 1) It's not based on evidence and fundamentally, non-scientific. 2) It offers no alternative and pretends it doesn't have to; 3) It pretends motion can arise from non-motion, intelligence from non-intelligence, conscious awareness from non-conscious stuff, etc. Atheists are among the most superstitious of all humans, contradicting ALL known evidence. First there is evidence, then there is science. Claiming to "disbelieve" in God is worthless superstition.
richardaberdeen 7 months ago
@bersa888 The universe is evidence for God, where is your evidence for motion arising from non-motion, intelligence from non-intelligence, conscious awareness from non-conscious stuff. What do you have to offer that is a BETTER explanation that Jesus already gave us; "Before Abraham was I AM". The explanation of Jesus satisfies origins, whereas Dawkins doesn't seem to know his ass from a black hole in the ground, remaining a living example of why a biker would never send their kids to Oxford.
richardaberdeen 7 months ago
Comment removed
bersa888 7 months ago
@bersa888 The universe is evidence of God. What there is "solid" evidence of, is that atheism is represents a greater superstition than all other superstitions combined. To pretend there is no God is to pretend that the human brain and my computer, my house and everything else human beings create, magically appeared all by themselves. Atheist = believer in magic.
richardaberdeen 7 months ago
@richardaberdeen "The universe is evidence" That part is right. Only you have to show how it is evidence of a god you can't just claim it and say it's true!
"atheism is .. a greater superstition" LOL How is it a superstition to NOT believe in unprovable claims from others! Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence! Atheism is the default position. You have to show your god is real!
As for magic, LOL, you're the one claiming magic - an invisible being doing things with no evidence!
mtbee9 7 months ago
Comment removed
bersa888 7 months ago
@bersa888 Sorry, I don't believe in magically appearing universes, magically appearing intelligence from non-intelligence, magically appearing laws of physics, magically appearing processes, magically appearing santa clauses, tooth faires, spaghetti monsters and magically appearing little green men from Mars like Hitchens. Sorry, atheism requires way too much blind faith for me to believe. Atheism = Total Bullshit.
richardaberdeen 7 months ago
Comment removed
bersa888 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@richardaberdeen "I don't believe in magically appearing universes, magically appearing intelligence from non-intelligence, magically appearing laws of physics, magically appearing processes"
ROFLMAO - That is exactly what your religion is: god = Magic! You cannot explain anything!
Oh that's the best laugh I've had all day! Thanks Dick.
mtbee9 7 months ago
@richardaberdeen On a serious note: You claim the universe was poofed into existence by god. Science says it was the big bang. You cannot prove where god came from and science doesn't know what happened before the big bang. It appears that these 2 sides are complementary, right? No they're not. Science is all about finding out what we can, which is why we now know about trillions of galaxies, DNA, and much more.
Religion is all about blindly believing in old mythological stories! No contest.
mtbee9 7 months ago
@richardaberdeen
To pretend that Zeus did not create everything is to believe that i am not real or the universe, or my house, or computer.
HambleThornberry 5 months ago
@HambleThornberry God, by definition, is the Creator of the universe; God has been defined in this manner by intelligent people from Socrates and the Greeks forward, as well as by many far sooner than that. Thus, your statement only demonstrates what great liars atheists are, pretending that the universe magically appeared all by itself, wthout any brains behind it.
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen
You can't disprove me. Zeus created the universe.
HambleThornberry 5 months ago
@HambleThornberry Regardless of what you call the Creator, it is correct to say that the Creator created the universe. That is what creator's do. And, regardless of how much you pretend the Creator doesn't exist, he goes right on existing anyway, just as regardless of whether you say the earth is in the shape of a sphere, cube or triangle, the shape of the earth remains the same. Grow up and stop embracing worthless superstition.
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen
Why would the universe need a creator? You're making assertions based on bronze age mythology. The universe does not need a creator. There is no 'proof' of a creator, nor is there one that is needed to create the cosmos.
HambleThornberry 5 months ago
@HambleThornberry Yeah right, my computer just magically appeared all by itself, nothing needs a creator, you are absolutely right, after all, you have managed to crawl outside the universe, look around, up and down and then, crawl back in, so you can assure us there is no God. Yeah, sure, as if you would know.
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen
I never said that nothing needs a creator. You get pre-existing materials and make a 'new' formation of particles and molecules. You still have not provided evidence for a creator. All you're doing is asserting time and time again. Primitive minds, how they enthrall me is stupendous(good and bad).
HambleThornberry 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen
Who says magic has anything to do about it? The laws of the universe is magic? Atheist don't beleive in magic. Atheism doesn't even have a stand on the issue of how the universe began. Atheism is a claim that no Gods exist. Thus, i can claim that YOU(not your kind) are misleading and not accurate in any of your statements.
HambleThornberry 5 months ago
@HambleThornberry Laws and processes don't magically exist unto themselves, any more than test questions for students at Oxford University, magically exist without some self-contradicting professor inventing them, however absurd and baseless such questions may be. Try going back to elementary school and starting over.
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen
Here we go. We know that the laws of the universe exist, and they do not need a god to exist(insufficient evidence in a Gods' favor). Read the definition of magic, think back two years ago when you were in 1st grade. Really try to use your frontal cortex for once. Because cosmology/science reaserches have yet to give the answer to 'why' laws are the way they are, you assume that there must be a creator of some sort? Bronze age mythology at its finest i must say.
HambleThornberry 5 months ago
@HambleThornberry There is no way of knowing if there is any such thing as a universal law and, some scientists question whether or not there is. However, there is overwhelming evidence that processes cannot exist unto themselves. First there is a universe, then there is life and then there is what science calls evolution. There is no evidence whatsoever, that evolution exists unto itself or, that gravity, light, motion or anything else we can observe, exists unto itself.
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen
There is no way of knowing? Including that we can replicate experiments in different locations with different variables and constants? Where is this evidence that proves processes cannot exist unto themselves?
HambleThornberry 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen
Saying to yourself that laws cannot exist unto themselves does not mean that a universe needs a creator. Some laws are constant, with or without a universe. Quantum fluctuations are a must. We don't know WHY there are fluctuations at plank scales, but we know they do occur. You're just cramming your belief in a deity into that why part. Just like in history when god did everything until research was made and God was taken out. Once we answer why, no more God(s) will be needed
HambleThornberry 5 months ago
@HambleThornberry If there is no universe, there are no observable laws, there is no such thing as "flutuations at plank scales", no such thing as Einstein's brain or any science theory and thus, there are no such thing as laws of any kind. You can't prove there is any such thing as a "universal" law. It is irrational to pretend that evolution can exist unto itself. First universe, then life, then evolution. There is no evidence any law, process or rule can exist unto itself. Grow up !!!
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@HambleThornberry No one knows if universal laws exist. Several scientists question their existence, including a leading Princeton physicist. It is impossible to know if universal laws exist, unless you were to travel to every point in the universe and test them. Atheists often claim belief in God is "untestable", yet they assume all manner of bullshit that can't possibly be tested in a trillion years. Several physicists seriously question if the speed of light is constant, for example.
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen
I must admit, the board of education has failed you. Seems like their 'new' style of training teachers how to teach has not gotten through your thick skull. You're so deluded by your pertinacious beliefs you must inexorably come to the conclusion that the cosmos needs a creator.
HambleThornberry 5 months ago
@HambleThornberry No, you are so deluded, that you pretend magic = science. Your responses demonstrate a severe lack of quality education. Educated people are well aware that the existence of "universal" laws is neither proven or provable. There are theories coming out of Princeton, as we speak, that seriously challenge the existence of universal laws, demonstrating that such assumed laws change as bodies move through space. This is probably over your head, but that wouldn't surprise me.
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen
Science = Magic???
Now i know you're a troll. Well, i'll play along. You are amusing me eitherway. People pretending to have a higher education than the 'rest' is always amusing.
Actually, there are universal laws, according to our known universe and beyond. But, they break down at certain temperatures. Some even coalesce(Electromagnetism, the strong, and weak forces) at high enough temperatures. Do you have a source of these so called 'theories' coming out of Princeton?
HambleThornberry 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen
Do you even have a high school education, sir?
HambleThornberry 5 months ago
@HambleThornberry Oh, I see. Since I have demonstraed over and over and over again, that your positions have no foundation in evidence, now you are questioning my educational background? Yeah, that's really convincing.
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen
Please, i alway encourage youth to read. Start reading up on quantum mechanics. It may be a big word for your likings but it will be worth the reseach.
HambleThornberry 5 months ago
@HambleThornberry
Always*
HambleThornberry 5 months ago
@HambleThornberry First there is universe, then there are people, then there is a term "quantum mechanics" and, various theories. Your position is plainly wrong, as are the positions of every atheist. It is irrational to pretend that any law, theory, idea or process can exist unto itself, without any brains behind it. The ONLY known rational explanation for the observable reality is "Before Abraham was, I AM". When you have a BETTER explanation, you be sure and let God know.
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@bersa All science manages to do is to demonstrate God creates life to adapt and change, so that life can survive. There is no evidence that life "evolves", as if it magically appears all by itself due to a magical "boogieman" non-designed process. Rather, ALL known evidence demonstrates that life is deliberately designed to adapt and change. Terms "natural", "natural selection", "nature" or, "natural world" demonstrate extreme bias, "creation" and "created world" match the same known evidence.
richardaberdeen 7 months ago
Comment removed
bersa888 7 months ago
@bersa888 or any combination of the 4 lol
biggums323232 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bersa888
CHRISTIANITY AND THE TRUTH OF THE BIBLE IS NOT GONE AND WILL NEVER BE AS THIS IS WORD OF GOD THE CREATOR OF EVERYTHING AND NOBODY CREATED AS PERFECT BOOK AS THE BIBLE EVER!!! A FACT THAT YOU ARE LOOKING FOR THE TRUTH AND UNIVERSAL ANSWERS MAKES YOU MORE THAN ONLY SOME ANIMAL OR EFFECT OF COINCIDENT AND EVOLUTION. ONLY CHRISTIANITY PROTECT THE LIFE!
FAITH IS A GIFT SO ASK GOD- HOLY SPIRIT FOR IT IF YOU WANT AND GET READY FOR BIG EVENT-GREAT WARNING SOON
thewarningsecondcoming . com
JezusSlave 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bersa888
CHRISTIANITY AND THE TRUTH OF THE BIBLE IS NOT GONE AND WILL NEVER BE AS THIS IS WORD OF GOD THE CREATOR OF EVERYTHING AND NOBODY CREATED AS PERFECT BOOK AS THE BIBLE EVER A FACT THAT YOU ARE LOOKING FOR THE TRUTH AND UNIVERSAL ANSWERS MAKES YOU MORE THAN ONLY SOME ANIMAL OR EFFECT OF COINCIDENT AND EVOLUTION. ONLY CHRISTIANITY PROTECT THE LIFE
GET READY FOR BIG EVENT-GREAT WARNING SOON
thewarningsecondcoming . com
JezusSlave 5 months ago
@bersa888 The problem with atheism is 1) It is not science; 2) They offer no alternative theory; 3) All they point to is controversy, have no evidence for magically appearing brainless universes; 5) Will NEVER be rational whatsoever, let alone a "real "field" of study, other than way out in right field; 5) It's supporters are plainly ignorant liars, afraid of their own Momma's shadows, plainly brainwashed and simply crazy beyond all measure. Gee, wonder why Jesus hated hypocrisy !!!
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen : Strange... I agree with you :-) Atheism is NOT a science; we cannot and don't offer any alternative theory (science does that); we have no conclusive or good evidence for a brainless evidence (science does, read and learn). BUT we are rational - it goes with being a skeptic. Finally, I got 22 thumbs up and you didn't :-). On the other hand, you never had or never will have a shred of evidence for anything. The case for the existence elves is much stronger - and cuter ;-)
bersa888 5 months ago 14
"To understand the purpose of you having free will, you have to understand catholic faith". You ask: "Why?". Do you really ask? Of course, not. You deceive yourself, or rather devil is deceiving you and so many others like you. He gave you false sense of sureness i obviousness. With that you looks like same schoolboy or parrot.Rather being idiot, please admit your lack of true knowledge and maturity about objective reality.God gave you free will, you could love God with all your heart, mind...
akwinata1 7 months ago
"To understand the purpose of you having good will, you have to understand catholic faith". You ask: "Why?". Do you really ask? Of course, not. You deceive yourself, or rather devil is deceiving you and so many others like you. He gave you false sense of sureness i obviousness. With that you looks like same schoolboy or parrot.Rather being idiot, please admit your lack of true knowledge and maturity about objective reality.God gave you free will, you could love God with all your heart, mind...
akwinata1 7 months ago
@akwinata1 what a nut job you are..
oaaserud 7 months ago
@akwinata1 "admit your lack of true knowledge and maturity about objective reality."
Nope certainly will not. I have a very good understanding of objective reality.
Now when it comes to believing in invisible, unknown, supposedly all powerful beings for which there is absolutely no evidence then it is certainly YOU that does not have a grasp on reality!
I'm not deceived by the devil because that is another one of your made up creatures for which there is no evidence. You are truly brainwashed.
mtbee9 7 months ago
"To understand the purpose of you having good will, you have to understand catholic faith". You ask: "Why?". Do you really ask? Of course, not. You deceive yourself, or rather devil is deceiving you and so many others like you. He gave you false sense of sureness i obviousness. With that you looks like same schoolboy or parrot.Rather being idiot, please admit your lack of true knowledge and maturity about objective reality.God gave you free will, you could love God with all your heart, mind...
akwinata1 7 months ago
Sarah Palin is good woman and catholic. Everybody who doesn`t like her is sick.
Catholic faith is true.
Free will is given to you to use it, but mind is given to you and God`s revelation that you use your free will for purpose for which free will was given for you.
To understand the purpose of you having good will, you have to understand catholic faith. But first thing to understand it is to know thai catholic faith is true. Second is to understand all truths of faith revealed by God as such.
akwinata1 7 months ago
@akwinata1 "To understand the purpose of you having good will, you have to understand catholic faith"
Why? I am perfectly capable of having good will without believing in your catholic fairy stories. If you need to believe the delusion to have good will - fine - go ahead. I don't need it.
mtbee9 7 months ago
Archapmangcmg is idiot, I don`t have to proof it, because it is obvious from his writing. Faith is human answer, with help of God, on God`s revelation so in what we catholics believe has authority of God. Faith is proofed by The Word of God, Jesus Christ. Nobody needs any more proofs, because This Proof is infinitely stronger than any human natural proof.The truth is: you have no idea about catholic faith, not because you are too thick, but too wicked to be obedient to God, your Creator, Saviour
akwinata1 7 months ago
God exists and He proved it in two ways. One is God`s creation, which tells about its Creator, by its very existence and by its content and wonderful order. Second is God`s revelation by Jesus Christ. But I have good and bad news for you, it depends on your approach. What God proved for you, you have to understand. What capacity of your mind do you have available? Very limited indeed.To understand second way of God`s proof you will need faith, I mean catholic faith,it is God`s grace to have it.
akwinata1 7 months ago
@akwinata1 Faith is not proof, and your claim that it allows understanding is both wrong on the face of it, and disproved by the Catholics that become atheists. As for using the universe as proof of God, laughably wrong. All the universe looks natural, just as it would without any gods. The obvious answer is that without evidence in favour of a god, we shouldn't believe in any gods.
Your burden is still as weighty, you've not done anything to meet it.
archapmangcmg 7 months ago
@akwinata1 " He proved it in two ways. One is God`s creation... Second is God`s revelation by Jesus Christ."
As neither 1 nor 2 is prove of a god your claim is meaningless.
Why is it creationists clams have no evidence to support them? Do you understand what evidence is?
I hope you never have to serve on a jury!
mtbee9 7 months ago
Going from 360p to 240p fixes the audio issue.
fedos 7 months ago
i just had a vision a original thought: a miracle, the outer is the source not the inner just trust me factor that in for everything it all makes sense. think about it.
jchino723 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All atheists are like Dawkins idiots. Reason can prove God is. Full stop. Atheists have weak heads, they can`t think properly. They don`t use reason rather than use it. That is the reason why they are so narrow minded, they are blind, they can`t see reality. Also as a punishment they are too stupid to believe God. They are His creation, yet they think they have reason greater than God and He has nothing to say to them. How stupid and wicked? Dawkins is not only idiot, but wicked. And for what?
akwinata1 7 months ago
@akwinata1 Sorry but profanity won't make the burden of claim that was put on you any less weighting.
You seem to believe God exists, it's up to you to prove it.
Wicked? Wickedness doesn't exist, psychology says that.
You clearly don't know shit about what you are saying, nothing I wouldn't expect from someone as aggressive and uneducated as you are behaving.
carlosewm 7 months ago 12
@carlosewm Psychology doesnt say "wickedness" does not exist. You need to read some books on psychology.
ah93704 7 months ago
@ah93704 Well since you know that you can explain why and how exactly it doesn't.
carlosewm 7 months ago
@carlosewm No, you seem to believe the univese can exist without any brains behind it. It is up to you to prove that. It is rational and logical to conclude a human brain needs a designer, just like it would be entirely rational and logical to conclude my computer needs a designer, even if someonewas came from another planet and had never previously seen a computer. The positions of atheists are total bullshit. Atheism should be called what it clearly is, belief in gross superstition.
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen I never said that, the current knowledge doesn't find any evidence for such creator, in fact, what it finds reinforces the idea that life has evolved over hundreds of millions of years, not some magic.
So I must prove the idea that YOU assert that I have (so that you can rebuke it and make yours look better) in order for your idea to be absurd?
You're got it wrong, it's up to you to prove creation, not me to disprove it.
carlosewm 5 months ago 2
@carlosew The time of universal creation only demonstrates what the Bible says, that God is an eternal Creator who has created in the past, is creating in the present and, will create long into the future. That is what ALL of the known evidence very clearly demonstrates. There is no evidence whatsoever, that "evolution" can magically exist unto itself. First there is a universe, then there is life, then there is evolution. There is no evidence that first there is evolution and, then life.
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen Quit wasting my time, you're not convincing me of your beliefs, you can barely even convince yourself of them (and you know it).
I don't see why you mention evolution, it has nothing to do with biogenesis, neither creation.
Create unto itself?
The bible is a collection of fairy tales influenced by older mythologies, what's written there is mostly figurative language, and even if it wasn't, it's 2000+ years old, I'll stick with science books.
carlosewm 5 months ago 2
@carlosewm I'm not trying to convince you of my beliefs. I am responding for others who read this forum, so they can easily see what great liars atheists are.
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen So you do believe stereotyping makes sense to any person of good critical thinking?
Unless you can prove all atheists are liars, then you're just inventing excuses for the cost of your image to the sight of any reasonable person.
I'm really not interested in what you believe, but in what you know, and knowledge is what you seem to be lacking in the areas you tried (and failed) to make valid points about, but don't blame yourself, most people do.
carlosewm 5 months ago 2
@carlosewm You are the one who brought up evolution, when you pretended that because evolution has existed for a long time, this somehow proves there is no God. This is basic atheist bullshit 1-A. The time of creation clearly demonstrates there is a God. An Eternal Creator has all of the time in the world and far more, to create. Your position is total nonsense--there is no evidence for magically appearing universes filled with finite beings of intelligence.
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen " The time of creation clearly demonstrates there is a God"
It does? How?
mtbee9 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen I don't see what you understand as "all of the known evidence" as the bible is not exactly evidence for anything other than that human culture can invent a vast amount of fairy tales as a form of moral teachings.
Your idea asserts that there is need for creation, as explained before, there's no evidence that there is this need.
You can't really prove your belief to be right (and you know it), i'm not trying to force my beliefs on other people, what about you?
carlosewm 5 months ago 2
@carlosewm I didn't say the Bible is the evidence. The universe speaks for God; that is what ALL of the evidence demonstrates, the universal evidence. Stop twisting my words and worse, twisting the obvious truth.
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen Atheism is superstition? Where? Do you even know what superstition is?
Is the absence of belief (which doesn't imply the negation of the existence) on one or more gods (atheism) superstitious in any way at all? It's as foolish as saying theism is superstitious, but you didn't see it (or didn't want to?..).
Superstition is the belief that you can manipulate cause and effect through supernatural means.
I'll give you an example of superstition: Prayer.
carlosewm 5 months ago
@carlosewm To pretend that a universe filled with finite beings of intelligence can magically appear without any Supreme Intelligence, represents a far greater superstition, than all of the rest of human superstitions combined. Who the hell are you trying to kid ? ? ?
richardaberdeen 5 months ago
@richardaberdeen "To pretend that a universe filled (Huh?) with finite beings of intelligence can magically appear (HUh?) without any Supreme Intelligence"
First how do you know the world is 'filled' with beings? We have not discovered any other life than on Earth so far.
What is with 'magically appeared'? That is what religious people claim. There is no magic involved with abiogenesis or Evolution.
As for superstition - None required - just evidence and logic and a desire to find the truth!
mtbee9 5 months ago
@mtbee9 Yeah, we have.. on asteorids... just not on planets...
al1511 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
R Dawkins - what an idiot! Not he along. Many others idiots, all of them are shouting: There is no God. What? Where are you from?
akwinata1 7 months ago
@akwinata1 "What? Where are you from?" Your comment makes no sense.
Of course theres no god it's all a fabrication of the human mind or do you have some proof or something?
mtbee9 7 months ago
Comment removed
carlosewm 7 months ago
if there was a God, he must have liked stupid people, he made so many so he had followers. people dont like thinking, they love fairytailes
footyclub1 7 months ago
4:05 Paula really liked that moon aliens talking french joke. She obviously has a crush on Dawkins
matthigh91 8 months ago 3
Evolution is supposed to be this big powerful thing...bringing forth all life--
but it coudn't even create a poodle. Breeders had to do it.
Still seeking God? He's worth it.
You are invited to visit my channel for a 3:47 feature video on an awesome God.
Peace.
GodisTruthseekTruth 8 months ago
@GodisTruthseekTruth God bless you sir!!
theaccousticaddict 8 months ago
@GodisTruthseekTruth Evolution didn't 'bring forth' all life. That's Abiogenesis.
Run along, ignorant child, unless you're willing to learn. If you can't even get your objection targeted at the right theory, how can you ever hope to be right!
archapmangcmg 7 months ago
Torpedoes of truth against a wall of lies
And the new animal was pleased to be with Adam and Eve and he wagged his tail.
And Adam said, 'Lord, I have already named all the animals in the Kingdom and I cannot think of a name for this new animal.'
And God said, 'I have created this new animal to be a reflection of my love for you, his name will be a reflection of my own name, and you will call him DOG.'
God even let us tinker with our toy He gave us ,dog breeding
and then there was horse
majorl311 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BELIEVE IN JESUS OR BURN IN HELL FOR ETERNITY !!!
THE END IS COMING VERY SOON !!! REPENT NOW BEFORE TOO LATE !!!
fuckmania07 8 months ago
I could listen to this guy talk all day long.
Subzero288 9 months ago 6
Its not dna its conscious energy people, but can anyone really see what they know ?
Birdinthehand1000 9 months ago
Comment removed
Birdinthehand1000 9 months ago
@Birdinthehand1000 Conscious energy would take on the biological form, we are what we eat, if we are a part of the universe beyond our imaginations then its not something we can explain very easily, but this would be related to the facts of nature, what would the universe be if we were not the eyes of God itself ? Would the universe exist if it was not seen by consciousness ? The fact that we exist is simply a miracle in itself,
Birdinthehand1000 9 months ago
"The greatest of 'Black Holes' are NOT found in the outer reaches of a vast and glorious universe. No,no,no! They are found, most interestingly enough and rather pleasantly I might add, in the bus station's men's rooms of our wonderful inner cities."
-richard dawkins 1976
malithe00 9 months ago
@kitchenaut Yet within biodiversity, we see entropy. We don't see species evolving but rather wearing away and disappearing. So, entropy DOES apply to "emerging" species. Look at humans: are we evolving or wearing away? Getting stronger or genetically weaker? The simple fact that this planet is losing species defies evolution. A dominant species (like man) will always eliminate weaker species. Survival of the stronger implies disappearance of the weaker.
civilization57 10 months ago
When did William Dembski ever say the intelligent designer could be an alien? Does anyone know?
Drunkenprophet23 10 months ago
@Zipperhedd
You cant tell the age of anything by just looking at it, that is stupid.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago