Romans made celibrities? More specifically it is the work of certain wealthy, powerful political families
. The decline of Roman political process, it's empire, were eventually deduced to the rise of sensational, non-stop colusium spectacles, etc..Roman writer/satirist Juvenal attributed the general Roman decline to the public being deviously,and intentionallly destracted.from attention to politics with his famous tract _Bread And Circuses_. Modern popular culture/sports has same effect..
@MartinLuciferKing Don't be so self-righteous. Racism is yet another expression of the mob mentality. You are simply seeking to legitimize an idea (racism and white nationalism) that will form a group which will (in theory) make you more likely to attain power over other individuals and groups. If your mob ideal becomes legitimized, those who disagree with it will become the new mavericks, as they once were.
Well, we are hard wired into seeking the best "good looks" in people as well as well as other physical and mental prowess. I don't see anything wrong with that. However, I do criticize the system which promotes masses to be attracted to ideals which are a diversion to the real deal-the real values and action in people that brings about a betterment to the greater good of one's kind. Not some ideals that bring about similar self gratification but evades a real cause and meaningful result.
well yeah me and my people have an evolutionary model to follow, who is our leader, the king of kings, the Father of fathers, the husband of husbands, who is the perfect one, whom we idolize, worship and serve.
Great video, but why include Kate Winslet? She's never done anything obnoxious in public,or anything typical of the type of Celebrity "culture" the video attacks.Two divorces,yes, but she never drags anything out in public for everyone to see ,or makes a spectacle out of it.Pretty classy,I'd say. Angelina Jolie,on the other hand........
Absolutely right, except that it isnt as new as you think (ecclesiastes9:11) but modern media have increased it enormously, thats true, and people of quality arent valued at all anymore nowadays LOL at the pic of Bono and Geldorff, always wondered what a Geldorff was for. Compliments in general.
they arent just trying to kill the blacks homie. they want us all dead. their plan is to keep a small group as slaves while keeping their bloodline as supreme.
The Vatican-Pope-Jesuits-illuminati-NAZIS-CFR run the world. they have all the judges, attorneys, doctors, major corporations, etc. all in their back pocket. bought & paid for, etc. our country is no longer free -we live in tyranny! truth an obscure thing, Oppression & lie is the norm. Were all slaves- our masters, the elite, r at least 50 years ahead of us in knowledge, technology, info., secrets & r using all of it against us!
You're exactly right. The elites are trying to kill the black people, they're white supremacists Nazis. All evidence and common sense corroborates with this. That's why they're planning to import 50,000,000 African "workers" into Europe, it's a ruse to hide their real plan of killing Africans with flouride. Jesuit ninjas will dress up as Zulu warriors and poison's sub-Sahara Africa's two water wells, thereby destroying the black race. Don't believe me? Go to truthknowledge and learn for yourself
@Anakyklosis Like EYEthatwatchestheEYE says : it's not just the blacks. Whites are actually these people's greatest enemy, followed by Muslems and then Blacks. We all suffer for the imperialist desires of a small group of malicious people who hate genuine culture and who are predominantly Jewish.
To NXSchell & all who have made this video (and others like it) possible - Thank you. You have done what others dare not do... that is, reach out to the sheeple, smack them upside the head with the Truth, and captivate them with it in a way that's both tangible and believable!!
Keep up the glorious work you're doing - PLEASE do not stop at any cost!!! We need you!!
@n0b0dy508 Zeitgeist is merely a word that describes the times people live in, this could be any time, the word in itself is neutral .... How is that "crap" ?
I speak perfect German, so know what the word means; on a sidenote ;)
@elysium76 I'm glad I'm not the only one feeling that way. Zeitgeist promotes egalitarian and marxist ideology. I value freedom too much to be able to agree with how zeitgeist wants to shape the world.
@brettl84 What is there you want to do but ARE free to? The Western world has never known so little freedom but most of us somehow seem to believe we're free because we're allowed to color a dot every so many years and the media tells us we're free. It's Orwell's 1984 but worse, really.
Well I like to travel. Ive been all over the states, Europe, the virgin islands and soon to be Egypt as of this summer . I enjoy spending time with my family friends. My job is fun and I have 2 dachshunds. I like to go running, play the guitar, have political debates, and play on the computer.
I mean I'm free to pursue my passions and work toward my own personal goals...Now that I answered your question... Maybe you can tell me what you want to do but aren't free to?
@brettl84 : First of all, there is little you're allowed to do with your own property without first asking permission to the government. A lot of speech is limited either directly (by law) or indirectly (by means of social pressure). Political participation is only allowed for those who defend the socio-political status quo, especially at national levels. Starting your own company is hindered by superflious laws and wealthy corporations you can't compete with. etc. Is that freedom?!?
@OutOfTheBoxThinker Thats just not true. You might have to get your house inspected for a safety permit or something (which is a good idea if you think about) but you can do what you want on your property if its not infringing on someone elses rights. I have never known a single person who the governments said.."you can't do that without permission."
And when has your free speech been censored by the government?
and people start there own companies all the time. and politicians are elected by us
How can you even say free speech is censored. We have more people protesting the government than ever before? You can hear opinions from all sides on the internet, radio, and television. You have no idea what freedom of speech even is.
@brettl84 Well, here in Western-Europe there are multiple laws that disallow freedom of speech on various topics EVEN if you're backed up by science. In the US free speech is protected by the first ammendment, but pressure from various "watchdog" groups guarantee that dissident speech is silenced nevertheless. Freedom of speech is an illusion.
You do hear opinions from various sides on the mainstream media, but only sides condoned by the system. All opinions that truely matter are censored.
@OutOfTheBoxThinker Well as far as property is concerned I have it pretty good. I wouldn't want to be a property owner thousands of years ago, when I'd have to fight to defend my lands from neighboring tribes...I wouldn't want to be a property owner hundreds of years ago, where kings and pharos owned all the land.
What are you trying to do on your property that you are not allowed too?
@brettl84 : Well, I don't own any property myself yet (I'm renting), but many people who do complain all the time about not being able to renovate their house, build a garden shack or do just about ANY change to their property without a costly permit (with the risk of not getting it - in some housing zones almost no changes are allowed at all).
Certainly the feudal system wasn't a good system either, but so say we are free today is a lie.
@brettl84 : You cannot do what you want on your property (at least not in Belgium) if it doesn't infringe on other people's rights. Further, a friend of mine was actually put in jail for expressing his opinion, organising meetings and selling controversial literature. They even accused him of "terrorism" even though he's a father of four children who never harmed anyone.
Politicians are first selected before they are elected. We can only choose between two sides of the same coin.
@OutOfTheBoxThinker I don't know the specifics of your friends terrorism case...because I'd only be getting your side of the story...and thats just the side you got from your friend.... lets just stick to our own personal experiences. You are obviously saying whats on your mind now without fear? What more do you want?Do you expect the mainstream media to give you air time?
@OutOfTheBoxThinker I notice you pick and choose which questions you want to answer.
Major corporations are owned by shareholders...even myself and probably you if you have any stocks or a retirement plan...a truely free market economy is only a theory(because regulation does exist)
having a representative government is the best we have been able to come up with. Without government, it would be anarchy and pure survival of the fittest. With government comes regulation.
@brettl84 : The problem is not government. The problem is government that does not represent the interests of its people. You may own a few stocks of some random companies, but you'll never have any real say in them unless you're someone like Warren Buffet or Jacob Rothschild and these people do not have the interests of the people in mind.
@brettl84 : many of my opinions are illegal in my country. The only reason I can say what I say is because I don't reach enough people (they only mind when you reach a certain amount of eople) and because my activities are mostly limited to Internet activities that are fairly difficult to trace (without cooperation from those operating the servers). Nevertheless, I risk my freedom just by speaking out on what i believe to be true.
@OutOfTheBoxThinker Can you name a specific legal document that regulates your freedom of speech??? If it truely is illegal I'm sure you'd be able to provide some place where it could be looked up??
@brettl84 : In my country we have an "anti-racist" legislation that makes any criticism of multiculturalism liable for prosecution, as well as a "Holocaust denial" law that makes any critical examination of particular aspects of WW2 impossible. Besides that, criticism of "representative democracy" (although not illegal) is nearly impossible due to social pressure as well as many of the more common liberal values that dominate Western-European society.
You didn't answer the question. You won't be able to find a legal document that says...."Criticism of multiculturalism is illegal. " It doesn't exist.
and your argument that "social pressures" keep you from speaking your mind...is nonsense. What you are copmplaining about is that a majority of people disagree with you?
So you can't go around LYEING about the holocaust?? It must be so hard for you??? You make it sound like you'd be shot for speaking out against government
@brettl84 : Look up the Belgian antiracism law. I could find a legal text but only in French or Dutch.
And I'm not speaking of lies about the Holocaust. I'm referring to verifiable facts that are just a bit controversial.
Social pressure is real. You can lose your job, your reputation and your social status for just standing up for what you believe in. That's enough to silence most people...
@OutOfTheBoxThinker I'm just saying "social pressure" is a fact of life. Its human nature. But if you believe in something strong enough, you just have to get over it or ignore it. Pressure from society is not infringing on your freedom of speech.
Anti-racism laws for Belgium? I thought you lived in Luxemborg???
@brettl84 : Social pressure is not just a fact of life. Often, very powerful organisations with corporate and political ties are behind these so-called watchdog groups. Pressure can be just as effective as censorship laws when it comes to silencing people.
I put Luxembourg in my profile because it's pretty nearby and I'm not aware of any such laws in Luxembourg. It's a safety measure.
I asked you what you weren't allowed to say; but wanted to. You said...
1. "Speak out against multi-culturalism"...(the antiracism laws in Belgium allow that. You can talk all you want about the problems with multiculturalism)
2. You said "criticize the representative democracy"...(you are free to do that in Belgium)
3. "Examine aspects of WWII"...You can do that...You just can't publicy justify or approve of Hitlers genocide.
All the things you wanted to say... you can. wheres the problem
@brettl84 1. The most popular party in the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium has been sentenced legally because of so-called "racism" for criticising multiculturalism... and that's just the most famous example.
2. I am free to criticize representative democracy legally, but it could cost me my livelihood and my social status.
3. No one justifies or approves Hitler's so-called genocide. There are just many scientifically valid arguments to disprove that what happened actually was a genocide.
1. Speaking out against the majority isn't easy...Some people have the courage, and many don't...But everyones free to do it. People who own businesses are free to hire whoever they wish based on if they like them or not. Would you want it any other way?
2.Scientific arguments are legal. The laws are there to prevent another NAZI party, which an overwhelming majority of people agree with.
3.Send me the name of the article...I guarentee I will find out what your not telling me about the case
@brettl84 1. Actually, people who own businesses are have been accused of racism for merely choosing the best man for the job. To claimthat everyone is free to speak against the majority is ignorant.
2. The laws exist to protect a corrupt, inefficient exploitative system... which the majority would disagree with if they were aware of it.
3. Check out V H O . o r g. It has a lot of interesting articles on the Holocaust as well as downloadable Ebooks. All of them are scientifically backed.
1)Your country obviously allows you to goto the site VHO website
2) Business owners have the final say in who they hire. You judge the employer as much as he judges you...and you are both FREE to decide if you want to enter the relationship based on what you say.
3)Send me the name of the case and I'll tell you what its missing.
4) You are in conflict because you want to speak out but aren't willing to take rejection. Thats your own issue, has nothing to do with government
@brettl84 1. The guy behind the VHO website has gotten a jail sentence because of his site and his books. I can watch it (as no sites are blocked for political reasons in Belgium) but in Germany they can't, though.
2. No you aren't. Companies have quotas to fullfil regarding gender and race.
3. What case?
4. I have no problem with rejection. I just don't want to go to jail or lose my job because of my views.
1. We are talking about your right to free speech. I'm not going to review all the laws in every country. You have claimed YOU don't have free speech, not some guy in germany...(that is the case I'm talking about as well as the racist party case you mentioned earlier)
2.If an employer can give a valid reason for not hiring someone...They are not required to do so. how have we moved from free speech to quotas?
3.You won't goto jail...you could lose your job...but again not governments fault.
@brettl84 1. Again, I don't have free speech. I'm just lucky the legislators are too lazy to bother about everyone making a statement online. As long as I don't publish any books or run a political website, they'll probably ignore me because I don't reach enough people.
2. If a black person is not as capable as a white person, you're sometimes still expected to hired the black person.
3. I CAN go to jail for my views if I print them and publish them. That's what happened to my friend.
1. Where in your legal code does it say you can't post internet comments, publish a book or political website??? You even said..." sites in Belgium aren't blocked for political reasons." If you know your rights so well I should easily be able to look it up. Your government publishes all there laws! PROVE your case!!!
2. If the employer finds something you say offensive, they don't have to higher you. Your trying to goto the topic of quotas without finishing the topic of free speech
@brettl84 : 1. I know of several cases where people have been sentenced for publishing books, organising meetings and running a website to excercise their free speech. If it is considered not in line with "anti-racism" or "Holocaust denial" laws it will be and has been prosecuted.
Such sites are not blocked, but they are taken from the Internet when legally possible.
2. You said that business owners have the final say in who they hire. I'm just giving an obvious example where they don't.
1. All I'm saying is tell me where in your laws it says that...easy enough???
2.I already said there is no point in telling me about your friends; Because I'd only be getting your side of the story, and you'd only getting your friends version of the story. If its not in the penal code, no jury would ever convict.
3. Business owners can reject applicants based on what they say. They might have to fill a quota but they still have final say on who gets the job.
@brettl84 1. I already referred to the "anti-racism" or "Holocaust denial" laws. They are vague enough for prosecutors and judges to silence any dissenting views involving multiculturalism and the Holocaust and have been used as such.
2. In Belgium, cases are judged by a judge alone except in case of capital crimes. Only then juries are involved.
3. Because of their quotas business owners are forced to hire people less capable than others and thereby discriminate straight White men.
1. You said it was illegal to print the books, publish websites, etc. Where does it say that.
2.You totally ignore my valid points about the Holocaust & Antiracism laws.
3.I think quotas are wrong. But if you disagree with a persons philosophy, you have the right not to hire them. We are talking about free speech and you are determined to change the subject for lack of a good counter-point.
@brettl84 : 1. Again, I refer to the "anti-racism" or "Holocaust denial" laws. They ban all statements deemed racist or not in line with official Holocaust dogmas and judges are allowed to interpret what material is considered as such.
2. What valid points?
3. So you admit that corporations can't hire anyone? You are indeed allowed not to hire a person or to fire a person because of his views, but does that sound just in a country that calls itself a democracy and a nation promoting free speech?
I feel like I'm talking to a brick wall. I think even if you agree'd with me just a little bit... Your ego won't let you admit it.
You are in denial that people must decide what is important to them. In life the things you say and do have consquences. Keeping your social status is more important to you than standing up for your beliefs. Thats not a violation of your rights. Why can't you see that?
@brettl84 : In a truely free society, you should not get a jail sentence or get ostracized for merely expressing your views. You should be able to express your viewpoints without fear of legal or social repercussion. If you disagree with that, I wonder how you would define freedom of speech.
In a truly free society.... people have the right to disagree with other peoples opinions and they can choose not to associate with those people that they don't like.
It wouldn't be a free society if people were forced to work and socialize with the people that they have disdain for. Being ostrocized happens naturally in any truely free society because people are hard-wired to think and judge for themselves.
@brettl84 : Disagreeing with other people is of course everyone's right, but discriminating people because of their religous, political or other views is a serious enfringement of other people's rights... at least in a society that CLAIMS to uphold freedom of speech as one of its primary values. There is no freedom of speech when dissident views are ostracised. That's just censorship in disguise.
Besides that, I notice you continue to ignore the legal aspects of Western-European censorship.
So you think freedom... is forcing people to socialize and work with others that they don't like? Why do you have a right to another persons time and services? Does it not make more sense to let the individual decide who they want to be friends with? Isn't that common sense
@brettl84 : I'm not saying anything about forcing people to socialize and work with others that they don't like. I'm talking about the freedom to express what you believe to be true without fear of repercussion. Both are entirely unrelated. Only narrowminded prejudiced people link not liking people with having different viewpoints. If you judge people on their beliefs rather than their character, then you are part of the problem.
you're illogical. its that simple. you are FOR discrimination when its not toward you...and wine about it when it is. You have made too many contradictory statements, and you go from one position to another...waste of time. byee
Its so obvious by your own comments and videos that you don't like Jews, minorities, or hippies. You have no problem discreminating against them...But you expect acceptance by people...While I respect your right to think what you want...I would definately not hire you for a job.
@brettl84 : It is your assertion that I have no problem discriminating against Jews, minorities or hippies. I disagree what Jews, Marxists, Feminists, Multiculturalists and Hippies stand for but I'm not suggesting any policies of discimination at all and I do not judge either of these for their beliefs. That's just an assumption from your side based on an incorrect interpretation of what I stand for. I'm not prejudiced.... But you are !
@OutOfTheBoxThinker You're right I am prejudiced... against people who don't like other people because of their race. I have never met someone who has broken that stereotype I have of that group...and you just reinforce that. At least I can recognize my own stereotypes. You can't see anything outside of your p.o.v.
@brettl84 : Actually, one of my favorite colleagues at a previous job was a black guy, one of my best online friends used to be a Jewish girl and my best real life friends today are a lesbian couple. I judge people for their character and their intelligence, not for their lifestyle, their beliefs or their race. Maybe you don't know how to think beyond stereotypes but I do. Don't apply your own narrowminded standards on other people please...
1. Antiracism laws enfringe people's rights to criticise the concept of multiculturalism and to question whether it's a good thing to have an open border policy. If it was just a ban of actual racism, I wouldn't mind since I see racism as a sickness caused by the disease that is multiculturalism.
2. "Holocaust denial" laws restrict scientific research on one of the most politically and culturally relevant aspects of 20th century history. I don't see how anyone can support that.
I think you lie about certain things to prove a point, and you justify this by saying to yourself... that you're spreading an important message. Because I think you lie and are illogical I am done talking with you. This will be my LAST post.
I know you are going to try to bait me into further conversation, thats how well I know you. even though I'm saying it... you will HAVE to have the last word! your so predictable. so its yours... have fun
@brettl84 : I'm also determined by logics. I strongly dislike irrationality, hypocricy, etc.
1. You mean a baseball BAT?!?
2. "anti-racism" & "holocaust denial" laws are mentioned in the same breath because they are both intended to silence voices dissident on key issues of liberal ideology (the beliefs that races are equal and Jews are eternal victims).
3. Not jumping to conclusions. You see A and imply B because you've been taught to connect them even though there is no logical reason to.
@brettl84 : You behave the way you're programmed to think. You behave the way the politically correct thought police has indoctrinated its subjects to think. I do not judge you for falling into their trap, which is why I try to discuss this issue in a mature and rational fashion instead of resort to petty namecalling as others would do. I just want to open your eyes to the Orwellian nature of our society, just like the guy who posted this video wants to achieve with his videos.
@brettl84 were you aware that negroes commit more crime statistically than any other race in the United States and are responsible for the majority of rapes? Have you heard the story about 12 year old Emily Haddock being brutally murdered by 5 savage and cowardly negroes? Probably not. The Jews teach you to hate your own race in their public edJEWcation system and keep the reality of the negro largely out of the public eye in their media. Result= uninformed anti racist believing nonsense.
@JenkemWOGbeforeUrun Even if I agreed with you (which I don't!) your idea of separating each race and having them govern themselves will never work. If you think its even possible, then you lack the ability to judge cause and effect (which I suspect you do). The fact is that every group has a statistic. You can attribute serial killers to being a mostly white male crime along with pedophillia. There are more blacks who do NOT commit crimes than do.
@brettl84 hating people for the color of their skin is indeed a stupid thing but thats not what true racist whites hate negroes for. We hate them for their evil behavior. Same for jews and mestizos. It is the destructive behavior of these groups causes whites to become racist and to want to live seperately from these groups. The media disparages us as white supremacists but that is only to hold the system together. Seperatists cannot be supremacists. We think each race should rule themselves.
Brett you are an absolute idiot. If you want to group races together then white people cause as much rape, killings etc as any other group!!! I am white but do actually judge a person on their character rather than race, religion or sexuality, which is clearly not what you do!
@brettl84 Basically your broad statement about having NO freedom of speach...Is simply not true. The truth is that the ONLY thing you can't do is lie about the holocaust.... Is that an accurate statement?
@brettl84 I'm just saying "social pressure" is a fact of life. Its human nature. But if you believe in something strong enough, you just have to get over it or ignore it.
Anti-racism laws for Belgium? I thought you lived in Luxemborg???
@brettl84 Basically your broad statement about having NO freedom of speach...Is simply not true. The truth is that the ONLY thing you can't do is lie about the holocaust.... Is that an accurate statement?
@MopDMTBARTL The Nazis were the ENEMIES of the people who currently run most of the Western world. Just look at how many of our top bankers, corporate managers, "art'" dealers, liberal radicals, Hollywood producers and other men of influence are Jews and you'll immediately understand why Hitler felt so much hatred for the Jews. It's not the Nazis but the Jews you must watch out for.
The culture is certainly corrupt - it is based upon what the media dicates. The culture is therefore just a reflection of the media portrayal. The media may therefore be seen to be corruption incarnate` - it accurately reflects the culture of the small 'chosenite' zionist minority that truly control it.
The book Religion of Macho shows that there are new false gods. Great channel Id love to see you do a piece on the media, the dastardly, devious, Zionist controlled Us media
Schell, I love your videos, but you always seem to put some unknown music that I like, so I suggest you start writing the name of the music used. I think I'm not the only person who will appreciate it.
Actually it was inaugurated in 80 AD, only it was called the Flavian Amphitheater then. The fight between Verus and Priscus was the highlight of the opening games by Titus. Look it up.
excatly!! This is what I miss in our world! A little discipline and respect! Not just idiotic population with no goals in their life. Great video, as every before :)
I believe comparing our society now with that of Ancient Rome is apt in many a way - both lifestyles are decadent, promiscuous, wasteful and reckless. I just hope that history repeats itself (as it is proven to do so) and our current society collapses similar to ancient Rome - and a new age of conservatism (or something good in the eyes of the righteous) replaces it - as has happened in history.
Also does anyone know where the starting gladiator scene comes from?
It is definitively from some documentary. Made a little research on Verus and Priscus. The fight really happened. It has been recorded by the Latin poet Martial, and is even the ONLY detailed description of a gladiatoral fight , that has survived to this day !
A great video and I was just waiting for that climax to completely bring out the truth about today's "celebrities" which is something I've always agreed with and believed - they are worthless nobodies selected due to some sick reason - and just diversions whom occupy our time with less important things while the ulterior motives of the cunning behind them work away for their own motives
Wow! This is what I tell people about every sigle day. I've been casted aside by old friends for saying things like this. Great video. Just brilliant.
The reason our society has come to this, is because our society is built around the media. They give the "go" no matter what. They manipulate and control everything, so whoever they say is a hero, he Must be!
Tv, Radio and the net are easy ways to do this. Generally speaking, we are bound to the way we progress nowadays and there are no optional paths to choose in order to go ahead. We must start anew in order to change the lead.
Society is way too big so people need to characterize it to couple of heroes. People are just out of the jungles, 10000 years of civilication is nothing compared to 4 billion years of evolution. We are still learning to comprehend and heroes help us to understand vast society and variety of different opinions, cultures ect.
"The Worship of the Worthless." Powerful words that well describes the religion of Celebrity. At least Christianity left some semblance of decency and morality. This modern day cult of personality is the new "circus" for Global consumption. It is a dominant force of distraction to the already indoctrinated media moulded masses. Just as Rome occupied its populace with "bread and circus" from the realities of an Empire in decline, so our modern day Caesars are following an all to familiar pattern.
Romans made celibrities? More specifically it is the work of certain wealthy, powerful political families
. The decline of Roman political process, it's empire, were eventually deduced to the rise of sensational, non-stop colusium spectacles, etc..Roman writer/satirist Juvenal attributed the general Roman decline to the public being deviously,and intentionallly destracted.from attention to politics with his famous tract _Bread And Circuses_. Modern popular culture/sports has same effect..
zuutlmna 2 weeks ago
Astonishingly many jews amongst ther "celebrities"... I wonder why that is...
My guess: Frankfurt school
TheNonConformative 5 months ago
i pay absolutely no attention to celebraties, most are just to degrading to gave a fuck about.
devilrpr 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MartinLuciferKing Racists are the mob. Clueless sheep beating their chests.
Where did you study those moronic lines ?
Clariccy 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MartinLuciferKing What a bunch of bullshit. You sound like a selfimportant twat.
Clariccy 5 months ago
Osama Bin Laden is the anti-celebrity
eDemocracyUK 6 months ago
I like the last quote, "worshipping the worthless"
elysium76 7 months ago 9
@MartinLuciferKing Don't be so self-righteous. Racism is yet another expression of the mob mentality. You are simply seeking to legitimize an idea (racism and white nationalism) that will form a group which will (in theory) make you more likely to attain power over other individuals and groups. If your mob ideal becomes legitimized, those who disagree with it will become the new mavericks, as they once were.
bxjam85 7 months ago
wow what a fantastic video. You put a lot of thought into your words on this. Made everything perfect!! thanks. I subd you
cash4medaily 7 months ago
Well, we are hard wired into seeking the best "good looks" in people as well as well as other physical and mental prowess. I don't see anything wrong with that. However, I do criticize the system which promotes masses to be attracted to ideals which are a diversion to the real deal-the real values and action in people that brings about a betterment to the greater good of one's kind. Not some ideals that bring about similar self gratification but evades a real cause and meaningful result.
moonlightcrawler 1 year ago 2
Who is the japanese guy at 2:22?
VivaTheEnd 1 year ago
we dont need emulate or idolize mortals, that is heresy
man can never be perfect
man struggles in existence, to become more advanced, superior and ascend in evolution
but the Ultimate Hero is always God
xXBlackxRebelXx 1 year ago
Well done for making this video. I am with you in the fight against the celebrity culture and those who promote it.
RichySKing 1 year ago
well yeah me and my people have an evolutionary model to follow, who is our leader, the king of kings, the Father of fathers, the husband of husbands, who is the perfect one, whom we idolize, worship and serve.
He's called Vishnu.
xXBlackxRebelXx 1 year ago
The age of decay will be followed by the age of purification.
toxicwhine 1 year ago
Great video, but why include Kate Winslet? She's never done anything obnoxious in public,or anything typical of the type of Celebrity "culture" the video attacks.Two divorces,yes, but she never drags anything out in public for everyone to see ,or makes a spectacle out of it.Pretty classy,I'd say. Angelina Jolie,on the other hand........
Substantive64 1 year ago
Nicely done! keep on the outstanding good work!!!!
PEACE
yallah5000 1 year ago
The intro is a bit too long but other than that it's yet another fine addition.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
Absolutely right, except that it isnt as new as you think (ecclesiastes9:11) but modern media have increased it enormously, thats true, and people of quality arent valued at all anymore nowadays LOL at the pic of Bono and Geldorff, always wondered what a Geldorff was for. Compliments in general.
LittlPussi 1 year ago
This video is brilliant!
Nefus2 1 year ago
all of the celeberties you showed at the end were women..................is there a reason for that?
drkthms1 1 year ago
Comment removed
d6forze 1 year ago
they arent just trying to kill the blacks homie. they want us all dead. their plan is to keep a small group as slaves while keeping their bloodline as supreme.
EYEthatwatchestheEYE 1 year ago
The Vatican-Pope-Jesuits-illuminati-NAZIS-CFR run the world. they have all the judges, attorneys, doctors, major corporations, etc. all in their back pocket. bought & paid for, etc. our country is no longer free -we live in tyranny! truth an obscure thing, Oppression & lie is the norm. Were all slaves- our masters, the elite, r at least 50 years ahead of us in knowledge, technology, info., secrets & r using all of it against us!
Go here:
truthknowledge. com
Spread it! Time is running out!
MopDMTBARTL 2 years ago
You're exactly right. The elites are trying to kill the black people, they're white supremacists Nazis. All evidence and common sense corroborates with this. That's why they're planning to import 50,000,000 African "workers" into Europe, it's a ruse to hide their real plan of killing Africans with flouride. Jesuit ninjas will dress up as Zulu warriors and poison's sub-Sahara Africa's two water wells, thereby destroying the black race. Don't believe me? Go to truthknowledge and learn for yourself
Anakyklosis 2 years ago
@Anakyklosis Like EYEthatwatchestheEYE says : it's not just the blacks. Whites are actually these people's greatest enemy, followed by Muslems and then Blacks. We all suffer for the imperialist desires of a small group of malicious people who hate genuine culture and who are predominantly Jewish.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
@MopDMTBARTL zeitgeist is crap...
TheSlovenc123 2 years ago 21
@TheSlovenc123 Amen. Zeitgeist IS crap...
To NXSchell & all who have made this video (and others like it) possible - Thank you. You have done what others dare not do... that is, reach out to the sheeple, smack them upside the head with the Truth, and captivate them with it in a way that's both tangible and believable!!
Keep up the glorious work you're doing - PLEASE do not stop at any cost!!! We need you!!
Peace&Love
God bless
Christopher
n0b0dy508 1 year ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
@n0b0dy508 Zeitgeist is merely a word that describes the times people live in, this could be any time, the word in itself is neutral .... How is that "crap" ?
I speak perfect German, so know what the word means; on a sidenote ;)
Clariccy 5 months ago
@TheSlovenc123 That is true, my brother wanted me to watch the first two parts, and I puked in my throught with all the misinformation.
elysium76 5 months ago
@elysium76 I'm glad I'm not the only one feeling that way. Zeitgeist promotes egalitarian and marxist ideology. I value freedom too much to be able to agree with how zeitgeist wants to shape the world.
TheSlovenc123 5 months ago
What is it that you want to do, but aren't free to???
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 What is there you want to do but ARE free to? The Western world has never known so little freedom but most of us somehow seem to believe we're free because we're allowed to color a dot every so many years and the media tells us we're free. It's Orwell's 1984 but worse, really.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
@OutOfTheBoxThinker
Well I like to travel. Ive been all over the states, Europe, the virgin islands and soon to be Egypt as of this summer . I enjoy spending time with my family friends. My job is fun and I have 2 dachshunds. I like to go running, play the guitar, have political debates, and play on the computer.
I mean I'm free to pursue my passions and work toward my own personal goals...Now that I answered your question... Maybe you can tell me what you want to do but aren't free to?
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : First of all, there is little you're allowed to do with your own property without first asking permission to the government. A lot of speech is limited either directly (by law) or indirectly (by means of social pressure). Political participation is only allowed for those who defend the socio-political status quo, especially at national levels. Starting your own company is hindered by superflious laws and wealthy corporations you can't compete with. etc. Is that freedom?!?
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
@OutOfTheBoxThinker Thats just not true. You might have to get your house inspected for a safety permit or something (which is a good idea if you think about) but you can do what you want on your property if its not infringing on someone elses rights. I have never known a single person who the governments said.."you can't do that without permission."
And when has your free speech been censored by the government?
and people start there own companies all the time. and politicians are elected by us
brettl84 1 year ago
How can you even say free speech is censored. We have more people protesting the government than ever before? You can hear opinions from all sides on the internet, radio, and television. You have no idea what freedom of speech even is.
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 Well, here in Western-Europe there are multiple laws that disallow freedom of speech on various topics EVEN if you're backed up by science. In the US free speech is protected by the first ammendment, but pressure from various "watchdog" groups guarantee that dissident speech is silenced nevertheless. Freedom of speech is an illusion.
You do hear opinions from various sides on the mainstream media, but only sides condoned by the system. All opinions that truely matter are censored.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
@OutOfTheBoxThinker Well as far as property is concerned I have it pretty good. I wouldn't want to be a property owner thousands of years ago, when I'd have to fight to defend my lands from neighboring tribes...I wouldn't want to be a property owner hundreds of years ago, where kings and pharos owned all the land.
What are you trying to do on your property that you are not allowed too?
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : Well, I don't own any property myself yet (I'm renting), but many people who do complain all the time about not being able to renovate their house, build a garden shack or do just about ANY change to their property without a costly permit (with the risk of not getting it - in some housing zones almost no changes are allowed at all).
Certainly the feudal system wasn't a good system either, but so say we are free today is a lie.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
@brettl84 : You cannot do what you want on your property (at least not in Belgium) if it doesn't infringe on other people's rights. Further, a friend of mine was actually put in jail for expressing his opinion, organising meetings and selling controversial literature. They even accused him of "terrorism" even though he's a father of four children who never harmed anyone.
Politicians are first selected before they are elected. We can only choose between two sides of the same coin.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
@OutOfTheBoxThinker I don't know the specifics of your friends terrorism case...because I'd only be getting your side of the story...and thats just the side you got from your friend.... lets just stick to our own personal experiences. You are obviously saying whats on your mind now without fear? What more do you want?Do you expect the mainstream media to give you air time?
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 I mean theres no pleasing people. People don't like regulations, but then they get mad if the free market doesn't work in their favor.
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : The so-called "free market" is a system for facilitate enslavement of common man by the major corporations. There is no "free market".
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
@OutOfTheBoxThinker I notice you pick and choose which questions you want to answer.
Major corporations are owned by shareholders...even myself and probably you if you have any stocks or a retirement plan...a truely free market economy is only a theory(because regulation does exist)
having a representative government is the best we have been able to come up with. Without government, it would be anarchy and pure survival of the fittest. With government comes regulation.
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : The problem is not government. The problem is government that does not represent the interests of its people. You may own a few stocks of some random companies, but you'll never have any real say in them unless you're someone like Warren Buffet or Jacob Rothschild and these people do not have the interests of the people in mind.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
@brettl84 : many of my opinions are illegal in my country. The only reason I can say what I say is because I don't reach enough people (they only mind when you reach a certain amount of eople) and because my activities are mostly limited to Internet activities that are fairly difficult to trace (without cooperation from those operating the servers). Nevertheless, I risk my freedom just by speaking out on what i believe to be true.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
@OutOfTheBoxThinker Can you name a specific legal document that regulates your freedom of speech??? If it truely is illegal I'm sure you'd be able to provide some place where it could be looked up??
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : In my country we have an "anti-racist" legislation that makes any criticism of multiculturalism liable for prosecution, as well as a "Holocaust denial" law that makes any critical examination of particular aspects of WW2 impossible. Besides that, criticism of "representative democracy" (although not illegal) is nearly impossible due to social pressure as well as many of the more common liberal values that dominate Western-European society.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
You didn't answer the question. You won't be able to find a legal document that says...."Criticism of multiculturalism is illegal. " It doesn't exist.
and your argument that "social pressures" keep you from speaking your mind...is nonsense. What you are copmplaining about is that a majority of people disagree with you?
So you can't go around LYEING about the holocaust?? It must be so hard for you??? You make it sound like you'd be shot for speaking out against government
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : Look up the Belgian antiracism law. I could find a legal text but only in French or Dutch.
And I'm not speaking of lies about the Holocaust. I'm referring to verifiable facts that are just a bit controversial.
Social pressure is real. You can lose your job, your reputation and your social status for just standing up for what you believe in. That's enough to silence most people...
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
@OutOfTheBoxThinker I'm just saying "social pressure" is a fact of life. Its human nature. But if you believe in something strong enough, you just have to get over it or ignore it. Pressure from society is not infringing on your freedom of speech.
Anti-racism laws for Belgium? I thought you lived in Luxemborg???
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : Social pressure is not just a fact of life. Often, very powerful organisations with corporate and political ties are behind these so-called watchdog groups. Pressure can be just as effective as censorship laws when it comes to silencing people.
I put Luxembourg in my profile because it's pretty nearby and I'm not aware of any such laws in Luxembourg. It's a safety measure.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
I asked you what you weren't allowed to say; but wanted to. You said...
1. "Speak out against multi-culturalism"...(the antiracism laws in Belgium allow that. You can talk all you want about the problems with multiculturalism)
2. You said "criticize the representative democracy"...(you are free to do that in Belgium)
3. "Examine aspects of WWII"...You can do that...You just can't publicy justify or approve of Hitlers genocide.
All the things you wanted to say... you can. wheres the problem
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 1. The most popular party in the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium has been sentenced legally because of so-called "racism" for criticising multiculturalism... and that's just the most famous example.
2. I am free to criticize representative democracy legally, but it could cost me my livelihood and my social status.
3. No one justifies or approves Hitler's so-called genocide. There are just many scientifically valid arguments to disprove that what happened actually was a genocide.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
1. Speaking out against the majority isn't easy...Some people have the courage, and many don't...But everyones free to do it. People who own businesses are free to hire whoever they wish based on if they like them or not. Would you want it any other way?
2.Scientific arguments are legal. The laws are there to prevent another NAZI party, which an overwhelming majority of people agree with.
3.Send me the name of the article...I guarentee I will find out what your not telling me about the case
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 1. Actually, people who own businesses are have been accused of racism for merely choosing the best man for the job. To claimthat everyone is free to speak against the majority is ignorant.
2. The laws exist to protect a corrupt, inefficient exploitative system... which the majority would disagree with if they were aware of it.
3. Check out V H O . o r g. It has a lot of interesting articles on the Holocaust as well as downloadable Ebooks. All of them are scientifically backed.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
1)Your country obviously allows you to goto the site VHO website
2) Business owners have the final say in who they hire. You judge the employer as much as he judges you...and you are both FREE to decide if you want to enter the relationship based on what you say.
3)Send me the name of the case and I'll tell you what its missing.
4) You are in conflict because you want to speak out but aren't willing to take rejection. Thats your own issue, has nothing to do with government
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 1. The guy behind the VHO website has gotten a jail sentence because of his site and his books. I can watch it (as no sites are blocked for political reasons in Belgium) but in Germany they can't, though.
2. No you aren't. Companies have quotas to fullfil regarding gender and race.
3. What case?
4. I have no problem with rejection. I just don't want to go to jail or lose my job because of my views.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
1. We are talking about your right to free speech. I'm not going to review all the laws in every country. You have claimed YOU don't have free speech, not some guy in germany...(that is the case I'm talking about as well as the racist party case you mentioned earlier)
2.If an employer can give a valid reason for not hiring someone...They are not required to do so. how have we moved from free speech to quotas?
3.You won't goto jail...you could lose your job...but again not governments fault.
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 1. Again, I don't have free speech. I'm just lucky the legislators are too lazy to bother about everyone making a statement online. As long as I don't publish any books or run a political website, they'll probably ignore me because I don't reach enough people.
2. If a black person is not as capable as a white person, you're sometimes still expected to hired the black person.
3. I CAN go to jail for my views if I print them and publish them. That's what happened to my friend.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
1. Where in your legal code does it say you can't post internet comments, publish a book or political website??? You even said..." sites in Belgium aren't blocked for political reasons." If you know your rights so well I should easily be able to look it up. Your government publishes all there laws! PROVE your case!!!
2. If the employer finds something you say offensive, they don't have to higher you. Your trying to goto the topic of quotas without finishing the topic of free speech
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : 1. I know of several cases where people have been sentenced for publishing books, organising meetings and running a website to excercise their free speech. If it is considered not in line with "anti-racism" or "Holocaust denial" laws it will be and has been prosecuted.
Such sites are not blocked, but they are taken from the Internet when legally possible.
2. You said that business owners have the final say in who they hire. I'm just giving an obvious example where they don't.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
1. All I'm saying is tell me where in your laws it says that...easy enough???
2.I already said there is no point in telling me about your friends; Because I'd only be getting your side of the story, and you'd only getting your friends version of the story. If its not in the penal code, no jury would ever convict.
3. Business owners can reject applicants based on what they say. They might have to fill a quota but they still have final say on who gets the job.
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 1. I already referred to the "anti-racism" or "Holocaust denial" laws. They are vague enough for prosecutors and judges to silence any dissenting views involving multiculturalism and the Holocaust and have been used as such.
2. In Belgium, cases are judged by a judge alone except in case of capital crimes. Only then juries are involved.
3. Because of their quotas business owners are forced to hire people less capable than others and thereby discriminate straight White men.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
1. You said it was illegal to print the books, publish websites, etc. Where does it say that.
2.You totally ignore my valid points about the Holocaust & Antiracism laws.
3.I think quotas are wrong. But if you disagree with a persons philosophy, you have the right not to hire them. We are talking about free speech and you are determined to change the subject for lack of a good counter-point.
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : 1. Again, I refer to the "anti-racism" or "Holocaust denial" laws. They ban all statements deemed racist or not in line with official Holocaust dogmas and judges are allowed to interpret what material is considered as such.
2. What valid points?
3. So you admit that corporations can't hire anyone? You are indeed allowed not to hire a person or to fire a person because of his views, but does that sound just in a country that calls itself a democracy and a nation promoting free speech?
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
The first thing I asked you was..."What is it that you want to say, but are not free to?"
After reviewing your argument about the antiracial & holocaust denial laws...I found out that you are free to say everything you said you wanted to.
1. You can speak out against multi-culturalism. That violates no laws.
2. You want to criticize the gov't...That violates no laws.
3.You want to scientifically debate wwii..No laws violated
your all over the place in your arguments
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 Again, many of my views are illegal and I could be prosecuted for that only if the legislators cared to prosecute a nobody like me.
1. Speaking against multi-culturalism violates the Belgian anti-racism law. People have been prosecuted and sentenced for this.
2. Criticising "democracy" is not illegal but social suicide.
3. Scientifically debating Holocaust dogmas is illegal in my country. People have been prosecuted and sentenced for this.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
@OutOfTheBoxThinker
I feel like I'm talking to a brick wall. I think even if you agree'd with me just a little bit... Your ego won't let you admit it.
You are in denial that people must decide what is important to them. In life the things you say and do have consquences. Keeping your social status is more important to you than standing up for your beliefs. Thats not a violation of your rights. Why can't you see that?
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : In a truely free society, you should not get a jail sentence or get ostracized for merely expressing your views. You should be able to express your viewpoints without fear of legal or social repercussion. If you disagree with that, I wonder how you would define freedom of speech.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
In a truly free society.... people have the right to disagree with other peoples opinions and they can choose not to associate with those people that they don't like.
It wouldn't be a free society if people were forced to work and socialize with the people that they have disdain for. Being ostrocized happens naturally in any truely free society because people are hard-wired to think and judge for themselves.
How is that not a true statement?
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : Disagreeing with other people is of course everyone's right, but discriminating people because of their religous, political or other views is a serious enfringement of other people's rights... at least in a society that CLAIMS to uphold freedom of speech as one of its primary values. There is no freedom of speech when dissident views are ostracised. That's just censorship in disguise.
Besides that, I notice you continue to ignore the legal aspects of Western-European censorship.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
So you think freedom... is forcing people to socialize and work with others that they don't like? Why do you have a right to another persons time and services? Does it not make more sense to let the individual decide who they want to be friends with? Isn't that common sense
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : I'm not saying anything about forcing people to socialize and work with others that they don't like. I'm talking about the freedom to express what you believe to be true without fear of repercussion. Both are entirely unrelated. Only narrowminded prejudiced people link not liking people with having different viewpoints. If you judge people on their beliefs rather than their character, then you are part of the problem.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago 2
you're illogical. its that simple. you are FOR discrimination when its not toward you...and wine about it when it is. You have made too many contradictory statements, and you go from one position to another...waste of time. byee
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : I am for discrimination when it's not towards me? Where do you draw that conclusion from other than your own prejudice towards me?
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
Its so obvious by your own comments and videos that you don't like Jews, minorities, or hippies. You have no problem discreminating against them...But you expect acceptance by people...While I respect your right to think what you want...I would definately not hire you for a job.
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : It is your assertion that I have no problem discriminating against Jews, minorities or hippies. I disagree what Jews, Marxists, Feminists, Multiculturalists and Hippies stand for but I'm not suggesting any policies of discimination at all and I do not judge either of these for their beliefs. That's just an assumption from your side based on an incorrect interpretation of what I stand for. I'm not prejudiced.... But you are !
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
@OutOfTheBoxThinker You're right I am prejudiced... against people who don't like other people because of their race. I have never met someone who has broken that stereotype I have of that group...and you just reinforce that. At least I can recognize my own stereotypes. You can't see anything outside of your p.o.v.
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : Actually, one of my favorite colleagues at a previous job was a black guy, one of my best online friends used to be a Jewish girl and my best real life friends today are a lesbian couple. I judge people for their character and their intelligence, not for their lifestyle, their beliefs or their race. Maybe you don't know how to think beyond stereotypes but I do. Don't apply your own narrowminded standards on other people please...
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
What do you expect people to think...When the only thing youv'e been complaing about as being an infringment upon your freedom of speech is...
1.anti-racism laws
2.holocaust denial laws
????
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84
1. Antiracism laws enfringe people's rights to criticise the concept of multiculturalism and to question whether it's a good thing to have an open border policy. If it was just a ban of actual racism, I wouldn't mind since I see racism as a sickness caused by the disease that is multiculturalism.
2. "Holocaust denial" laws restrict scientific research on one of the most politically and culturally relevant aspects of 20th century history. I don't see how anyone can support that.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
I look at things logically. My thought process are more so hard-wired in my DNA , then a product of my environment.
1. For example: It is logical to think that a stranger running at me with a baseball held in striking position, will cause me harm.
2. It is logical to think that someone who says that anti-racism & holocaust denial laws has issues with race.
3.Give me one reason why I should deduce your statements another way?
brettl84 1 year ago
I think you lie about certain things to prove a point, and you justify this by saying to yourself... that you're spreading an important message. Because I think you lie and are illogical I am done talking with you. This will be my LAST post.
I know you are going to try to bait me into further conversation, thats how well I know you. even though I'm saying it... you will HAVE to have the last word! your so predictable. so its yours... have fun
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 : Why would I lie? What makes you think I'm lying? Again, your prejudice shows.
I say what I believe to be true. You may disagree with my viewpoints, but calling me a liar is yet another prejudiced statement from your part.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@brettl84 : I'm also determined by logics. I strongly dislike irrationality, hypocricy, etc.
1. You mean a baseball BAT?!?
2. "anti-racism" & "holocaust denial" laws are mentioned in the same breath because they are both intended to silence voices dissident on key issues of liberal ideology (the beliefs that races are equal and Jews are eternal victims).
3. Not jumping to conclusions. You see A and imply B because you've been taught to connect them even though there is no logical reason to.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
@brettl84 : You behave the way you're programmed to think. You behave the way the politically correct thought police has indoctrinated its subjects to think. I do not judge you for falling into their trap, which is why I try to discuss this issue in a mature and rational fashion instead of resort to petty namecalling as others would do. I just want to open your eyes to the Orwellian nature of our society, just like the guy who posted this video wants to achieve with his videos.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
@brettl84 were you aware that negroes commit more crime statistically than any other race in the United States and are responsible for the majority of rapes? Have you heard the story about 12 year old Emily Haddock being brutally murdered by 5 savage and cowardly negroes? Probably not. The Jews teach you to hate your own race in their public edJEWcation system and keep the reality of the negro largely out of the public eye in their media. Result= uninformed anti racist believing nonsense.
JenkemWOGbeforeUrun 1 year ago
@JenkemWOGbeforeUrun Even if I agreed with you (which I don't!) your idea of separating each race and having them govern themselves will never work. If you think its even possible, then you lack the ability to judge cause and effect (which I suspect you do). The fact is that every group has a statistic. You can attribute serial killers to being a mostly white male crime along with pedophillia. There are more blacks who do NOT commit crimes than do.
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 hating people for the color of their skin is indeed a stupid thing but thats not what true racist whites hate negroes for. We hate them for their evil behavior. Same for jews and mestizos. It is the destructive behavior of these groups causes whites to become racist and to want to live seperately from these groups. The media disparages us as white supremacists but that is only to hold the system together. Seperatists cannot be supremacists. We think each race should rule themselves.
JenkemWOGbeforeUrun 1 year ago 2
Brett you are an absolute idiot. If you want to group races together then white people cause as much rape, killings etc as any other group!!! I am white but do actually judge a person on their character rather than race, religion or sexuality, which is clearly not what you do!
Dannimaule 8 months ago
@brettl84 Basically your broad statement about having NO freedom of speach...Is simply not true. The truth is that the ONLY thing you can't do is lie about the holocaust.... Is that an accurate statement?
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 I'm just saying "social pressure" is a fact of life. Its human nature. But if you believe in something strong enough, you just have to get over it or ignore it.
Anti-racism laws for Belgium? I thought you lived in Luxemborg???
brettl84 1 year ago
@brettl84 Basically your broad statement about having NO freedom of speach...Is simply not true. The truth is that the ONLY thing you can't do is lie about the holocaust.... Is that an accurate statement?
brettl84 1 year ago
@MopDMTBARTL The Nazis were the ENEMIES of the people who currently run most of the Western world. Just look at how many of our top bankers, corporate managers, "art'" dealers, liberal radicals, Hollywood producers and other men of influence are Jews and you'll immediately understand why Hitler felt so much hatred for the Jews. It's not the Nazis but the Jews you must watch out for.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
The reason that the Epic Beard Man became a celebrity is because he presented an evolutionary edge - fighting young hoodlums at an advanced age.
lunaris19 2 years ago
The culture is certainly corrupt - it is based upon what the media dicates. The culture is therefore just a reflection of the media portrayal. The media may therefore be seen to be corruption incarnate` - it accurately reflects the culture of the small 'chosenite' zionist minority that truly control it.
barrycw1 2 years ago
The book Religion of Macho shows that there are new false gods. Great channel Id love to see you do a piece on the media, the dastardly, devious, Zionist controlled Us media
barrycw1 2 years ago 2
great video...as always.
PasswordPower 2 years ago
Bingo! Then there is the fact these celebrities, as with those large games in large arenas, all serve as distractions from the reality of the moment.
NoorAlHaqiqa 2 years ago
Worship of the superficial, too.
A society of people with no depth and no substance, but only form. Only an outside, with nothing at all inside of them.
Surface People.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 2 years ago 3
Schell, I love your videos, but you always seem to put some unknown music that I like, so I suggest you start writing the name of the music used. I think I'm not the only person who will appreciate it.
dex33 2 years ago 3
It's Triarii - Regicide II.
fallenleaves1234 2 years ago
you're not.
insanetrickster 2 years ago
Good Job. This is nice.
zanstorm2 2 years ago
wow wow did you write the text for yourself? i love it
sabrinadia 2 years ago
colloseum wasnt built in 80 ad i think
zachsocool16 2 years ago
@ zachsocoool16
Actually it was inaugurated in 80 AD, only it was called the Flavian Amphitheater then. The fight between Verus and Priscus was the highlight of the opening games by Titus. Look it up.
TCPPacket 2 years ago
"Worshipping the Worthless" Indeed!
The cheap, phony tinsel garbage of Trash culture, distracts the publics mind from the truth and from an ever encroaching brutal reality.
Where does it go from here? how can it be further sustained? How much further down is there left?
Did the Noble peace prize not go to an active warlord?
Chief of a marauding, power lusting Nation?
We live in Farcical times.
Another excellent video from one of the finest channels on the internet.
ireland2day 2 years ago 18
Thank you for another valuable addition to the cause.
Mekurion 2 years ago 2
The majority of "celebrities" are worthless, though some famous actors do live up to their name and fame in their acting skills.
soccom8341576 2 years ago 2
excatly!! This is what I miss in our world! A little discipline and respect! Not just idiotic population with no goals in their life. Great video, as every before :)
Slovejnc 2 years ago
I guess you are well set to have success in life?
soccom8341576 2 years ago
@soccom8341576 I think so...
Slovejnc 2 years ago
aтв this is what we got after USSR crash
many thanks to "democracy"
MrDZUman 2 years ago 2
I believe comparing our society now with that of Ancient Rome is apt in many a way - both lifestyles are decadent, promiscuous, wasteful and reckless. I just hope that history repeats itself (as it is proven to do so) and our current society collapses similar to ancient Rome - and a new age of conservatism (or something good in the eyes of the righteous) replaces it - as has happened in history.
Also does anyone know where the starting gladiator scene comes from?
SturmFMJ 2 years ago 3
I believe that the gladiator scene is from some discovery or history channel documentary.
However I can´t remember the name of it.
Mekurion 2 years ago
It is definitively from some documentary. Made a little research on Verus and Priscus. The fight really happened. It has been recorded by the Latin poet Martial, and is even the ONLY detailed description of a gladiatoral fight , that has survived to this day !
TCPPacket 2 years ago
I remember that i watched it maybe a year ago. I think it was pretty much centered around gladiators and/or Colosseum.
Mekurion 2 years ago
A great video and I was just waiting for that climax to completely bring out the truth about today's "celebrities" which is something I've always agreed with and believed - they are worthless nobodies selected due to some sick reason - and just diversions whom occupy our time with less important things while the ulterior motives of the cunning behind them work away for their own motives
SturmFMJ 2 years ago 3
Excellent vid as always.
The critics rave reviews for NXSchell:
"We who are about to die salute you!" -anonymous gladiator
"Word, yo!" -Plies
"That's hot." -Paris Hilton
christopher81818 2 years ago 3
"Celebrities are a reflection of the society that made them"
nice, so true, another amazing well informing video.
xXDominoXx 2 years ago
Schell. you open my eyes every time. I love it dude. keep it up.
SlayerofEmokids 2 years ago
Wow! This is what I tell people about every sigle day. I've been casted aside by old friends for saying things like this. Great video. Just brilliant.
9VirtuesKeeper 2 years ago 2
@9VirtuesKeeper: they were not your friends in the first place! sorry for the thumb down, I pushed the wrong button
hecdaca2007 2 years ago
This is so true.
benigma101 2 years ago
brilliant!
debtruth1 2 years ago
Bread and Circus
InTheEndIWasRight 2 years ago 2
Great video as always!
The reason our society has come to this, is because our society is built around the media. They give the "go" no matter what. They manipulate and control everything, so whoever they say is a hero, he Must be!
Tv, Radio and the net are easy ways to do this. Generally speaking, we are bound to the way we progress nowadays and there are no optional paths to choose in order to go ahead. We must start anew in order to change the lead.
My 2 cents here...
otinane89 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
otinane89 2 years ago
Society is way too big so people need to characterize it to couple of heroes. People are just out of the jungles, 10000 years of civilication is nothing compared to 4 billion years of evolution. We are still learning to comprehend and heroes help us to understand vast society and variety of different opinions, cultures ect.
miiiikku 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The Worship of the Worthless." Powerful words that well describes the religion of Celebrity. At least Christianity left some semblance of decency and morality. This modern day cult of personality is the new "circus" for Global consumption. It is a dominant force of distraction to the already indoctrinated media moulded masses. Just as Rome occupied its populace with "bread and circus" from the realities of an Empire in decline, so our modern day Caesars are following an all to familiar pattern.
TRUEANGLO 2 years ago
Comment removed
TRUEANGLO 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yawn...too long.
meh.
Superbowls on!
xunatz 2 years ago
5*****
Wedumgoodblkfolk 2 years ago 3
But why has it downgraded? That's the question.
Ontologistics 2 years ago
Your videos make me so sad :((
Nangeala 2 years ago
very well put video lets destroy the jewish money and the Modern Celelbertys would be no more
MegaBradybunch 2 years ago
Excellent.
steve0281 2 years ago 2
Excellent indeed!!
BlacksAreBeautiful 2 years ago
Check out his other stuff. You won't be disappointed.
steve0281 2 years ago 2
wonderful
mbleek2001 2 years ago
Outstanding. Five stars, share, and favorite.
bertly71 2 years ago 2
Great video!
I recommend the book
'Life the Movie: How Entertainment Conquered Reality' by Neal Gabler
for those who haven't read it. It expands brilliantly on the theme of this video.
FranG1214 2 years ago
The American Empire is crumbling.
Reformation1517 2 years ago 2
Pervert/subvert/invert the survival instincts.
nameofthepen 2 years ago 3
Garbage in garbage out.
UcanbeGOD 2 years ago 6
George Carlin was right.
xxdiogenescynicxx 2 years ago 3
brilliant video
Pandemic43 2 years ago 2
excellent.
ashtool 2 years ago
As superb as always.
*****
ElysiumFilms 2 years ago 5