Yo, I noticed this last night when I was watching a documentary which is what brought me to search "WTC flashes". Holy god, this is serious crucial evidence, I'm wondering why you don't see these flashes in other clips shown up close. Maybe the way the buildings surrounding blocked sun light from hitting the windows. The only time you see these flashes is from angles that are elevated, from distant rooftops or choppers.
For all the fuckwits that think the flashes are windows or `glass`, tell me this - how is then that concrete and steel can be blown to dust in an instant but not windows? also tell why the flashes are visible n the shadows, through thick dust AND on the remnants of the CORE as it goes down. ONE more thing, why are you idiots so retarded to call us truthers when all we do is look at the facts, listen to the experts and use our own common sense without listening to government fed bullsit!
Zionist False Flag Operations: 1946 Bombing of King David Hotel, Israelis dressed as Arabs 1954 Levone Affair, Israelis blew up American Instillations in Cairo to blame Egypt 1967 USS Liberty attacked by Israelis, 34 Americans killed 170 wounded, to blame Egypt 1968 US Embassy attacked by Israeli commandos in Amman, to blame Jordan 1986 Berlin Disco bombing by Israel, to blame Lybia 2001 Israel attacks on 9/11. 1st blamed on Palestinians by Mossad Agents Caught on scene. 911 ✡ ✈ ▌▌.
@Hotters70603XL, you are defending the government more than I am, friend. I just proved how idiotic (and not to mention contradictory) how most of you conspiracy theorists are so quick to let the general public know that the government is lying but you use documents from that very same government to prove your point. That's very funny to me. Oh and the racist namecalling is a real touch of class. Now focus and hit me back with how the big bad Bus 'sploded the towers. (P.S.: I'm a cracka)
@Hotters70603XL, think, McFly...you are accusing the government of killing it's citizens yet you cite a document that comes from that very same government who at the time of the attacks was part of the Bush administration. Good call man...I sure am convinced now.
@Hotters70603XL The FEMA report? Seriously, you are accusing the government of killing it's own citizens and yet you cite a FEMA report. FEMA, a government agency that brought us ther Katrina response? No fres water, no food, bodies floating in the water. Remember all that?
@azar783402 Sadly most American's have never heard of "Operation Northwoods" and many still have never even heard of "Building 7", Yet they arrogantly think they are fully informed becauce they listen to the controlled Corporate Media... And of course their Government "would never lie to them"
You'd have to be a moron to believe 19 Arab misfits with box-cutters taking orders from a boogeyman in a cave in Afghanistan pulled this off
At least 7 of the 9/11 hijackers are STILL ALIVE for fuck's sake
Care to rebut that one...you and the rest of your theorist buddies are basing your "demolition theories" on your distrust of the government yet are quick to fire off references to documents like this FEMA appendix. I find that interesting. Either way, you look like a bunch of idiots. Moreover, you piss on the memories of everyone who died on 9/11.
@Hotters70603XL FEMA? The same people who brought us the seamless and professional respose to Hurricane Katrina? Yeah, I sdhould read a document written by those bozos! Nice try.
What kills me is none of you dumbass conspiracy theorists have no clue whatsoever what it takes to perform a controlled demolition. That's what makes this laughable.
@azar783402 What facts? Show me the reports that confirm thermite was used in the collapse of the towers. Do you even know how much thermite you need to get such buildings down? you literally need truckloads full of it. douzens of trucks that dropped off thermite unnoticed? So what people were involved then? You seem to know exactly how it happened, well, tell me how the thermite got into the towers. How many people are involved then, according to you?
@azar783402 Dude, you underestimate how hot fires could get and how that has effect to steel. Fire burned for 8 hours with temperatures rising up to 1100 degrees F. Yes not enough to melt it, but it is enough to loose strength and stiffness. Not to mention the damage caused by the collapse of WTC 1. No evidence of explosions is seen at the moment of collapse of WTC 7.
Ok the plane hit at an angle making a huge hole in one corner (meaning two walls) of the tower finally giving away the top of the tower falls now the top remains intact for atleats 7 seconds of the 10 seconds of colapsion now the top is falling at a angle causing the top to push walls out not fall in but out making debri fly away
I mean away from the tower the little clouds of dirt flying out of windows is the affect of air being pushed out of the tower thats how it happened
@azar783402 Do you know how WTC 7 was build? It had only three main trusses holding the building up, once one of them failed, it pulled the rest of the building with it.
It's easy to say that every skyscraper that has had unprotected infernos burning for an hour with weakened steel infrastructures has collapsed.
"7 contained barely any damage and had small fires"
WHAT A HORRENDOUS LIE! Look at the south side of the tower, please! Nothing but smoke and fire. And you can clearly see the 50 tonne chunk of steel from the North Tower that hit 10 of its floors.
@azar783402 , Yes it did! The collapse of WTC 1 caused lots of damage to the southwest side of WTC 7. Then came the fires. The building burned uncontrollable for 8 hours. At some points steel was heated up to 1100 degrees F. Enough to loose strength and stiffness.
Funny thing is, the "squibs" many people see in the corner, AREN'T squibs! They're broken windows and jagged holes from WTC1 debris. It's clearly seen in HD pictures of that corner (as well as the infernos, and smoke, which twoofers tend to ignore.)
Squibs leave very distinct, dark, powerful debris and smoke trails. Twoofers ignore this. There was a gentle, weak amount of smoke due to air pressure blowing debris out of those holes.
@MazJax Exactly, none of the so called "truthers" seem to be aware of the phenomenon "air pressure" and immediatly say it was a controlled demolition.
@MaxwellEindhoven Barium nitrate & sulfur are part of the military patent on what is known as thermate (thermite with sulfur & barium nitrate added), Barium is a very toxic metal, so one would not expect it to be present in the large concentrations in WTC dust.
Thermite reactions produce molten iron which was seen pouring out of the Towers. Pools of molten iron were still being found under the Twin Towers & Building 7 rubble up to 6 weeks after 9/11.
@castle001 Dude, the "iron" pouring down the South Tower was aluminum from the airplane, aluminum has a much lower melting point. The structural steel of the towers never melted. The hot glowing metals found in the rubble of Ground Zero were found even weeks after 9/11. Don't you think metal would cool down once it's melted? It would solidify within seconds. It was glowing hot metal because there were fires inside the rubble for weeks!
When someone posts a video and then starts swearing and having a hissy fit when challenged, just shows that this video and that person is not worth wasting energy and time on. I'm open to all arguments but this video shows nothing and the person posting it adds nothing, move on people.
@azar783402 You just keep repeating yourself dickhead. This one video isn't enough proof. You just see little flashes, but there's no evidence the flashes are charges going off. It's most likely just the glass shattering and reflecting sunlight. Have you got any other (real) evidence besides this video?
look im all for this conspiracy thing but look at the video man....the "flashes" are still flashing in spots above where the building is falling....the top portion of the building has already dropped and flashes are still going off above it within the smoke....looks more like a reflection of paper than actual charges going off....get a better quality video
@azar783402 Well, it's not a surprise the site was sealed off, it was a massive crime scene. And yes, somebody has to clean up the mess. But where's the evidence of charges going off?
@azar783402 Well, once again, where is the evidence of your claim? There was no molten steel, it was some sort of metal, but it is never investigated. It's unlikely the structural steel melted, since the temperature weren't high enough. The fuselage of the plane was made from aluminum, which has a much lower meltingpoint.. That did melt, we saw it dripping down the facade of the South Tower. Now answer my questions then, if you are so sure of charges going off.
@azar783402 One video isn't enough you idiot! Whay type of material has been used? How has it been used? Who used it? How much has been used? If you have evidence you can answer these questions...
@azar783402 You choose to use this one video as your evidence? Because you think you see something in a vague video you assume you are right? You are ignoring the the truth to confirm your fantasies. Apparently you know nothing about controlled demolition, have you ever been to a real demolition of a skyscraper? You need tons of explosives, and really tons of it. Truckloads full of dynamite, you think it was stored in the buildings unnoticed? Have you got ANY evidence of a CD? No you don't.
@MaxwellEindhoven perhaps active thermitic material found in the dust is a clue - and the fact that the building blew up all over manhattan and was reduced to dust - and the fact that for upper floors to crush lower floors the upper floors would need to be indestructible - and yet they are made of the same material - newton's third law requires an equal and opposite reaction to an action - so top floors would be destroyed and could never destroy all the way to the bottom - physics-
@azar783402 No there is no evidence. Where is it? I haven't seen it. Nobody has! Only some shit people made up to feel like an anarchist, to fight agains the authorities. And people are dumb enough to believe that instead of the confirmed official report.
Your kidding right? Your country was one of the FIRST to sign up to Bush's "coalition of the willing" , Your country has a political party that makes it quite clear they hate muslims or any dark skin people, Many of countrymen have left the Netherlands for that very reason and now reside in New Zealand because they thought no dark skin people lived here UNTIL they discover Maori and Pacific Island people do live here an then all they want to do is moan about it
..........I'm waiting for one of these Pro-American Dick Head Texans to come and try to explain those flashes all along the floor awaiting to collapse...
Watch a video of a controlled demolition, watch several, then you'll see what a real controlled demolition looks like
Very loud explosions seen across a wide span of windows as seen in a controlled demolition vs. a silent poof of light in a single window as seen on 9/11
@username7046 No he doesn't, he has only a theory of what happened in his opinion. It was no controlled demolition so this richard gage is talking bollocks!
I have been reseaching the BILDERBERGS. for the past couple of year's .. they caused it .. just like rothchild caused and profit'ed from ever war since the 1700's.(the rothchilds and rockafellers( BILDERBERGS) are the key mover's in modern day Imperialist..... dont fight war's. they get other's to create them .. and they just profit. now throught the USA war's and the creation of derivates on the stock market and the ression they will soon own america .. lock .. stock and barel
@IAmReallyAwesome0 really I bet you had to look hard to be able to pull that one out ur arse! take your head out from where the sun dont shine, sonnie.
Look at both of these buildings in the beginning.BLACK SMOKE-which is a sign of an oxygen starved fire which means that there
are barely any FLAMES which inturn means that is here r no flames then no way in hell is steel heating up & no way for these buildings to collapse due to fire.All rubbish.The flashes show how these buildings were exploded.
May u burn in hell Bush.Thanks for taking a 1 1/2 month vacation after PUTIN warned u of exactly what was going to happen,who was going to do it,etc.
It amazes me that the american people cant even recognize an explosion when they see it. The black smoke is from the fire and the white is from the explosion of the entire building. Look up krakatoa on how things work .. amazing
Thats just a cover for the real security of the WTC. Kroll was brought in to revamp security after the 93 attack.
Thy are owned by Marsh and McLennan now, the impact zone of American Airlines 11. Might I add that they were both at the center of 9/11 insider trading being processed in the buildings before the collapse....
surely if these flashes were indeed a series of demolition explosions... wouldnt there be a big explosion, sound.. things like that... not just a little flash in a window? (not that i dont think this was an inside job... i have reserched into this for bout 2 years)
explosions were heard for wtc tower 7 and reported by firemen, also for tower 2.
remember there was aot of noise, everywhere forn the towers, look at news info form back then before the towers fall, in the hours preceding it, you can hear a huge noise spreading. coverign everything, even reporter at 100 meters from it had to shout to can make comments, and all witnesses told they could hear this noise far away form the WTC.
power cut the weekend before this hapend (it was a monday morning) where "workers" in workers clothes were seen entering and leavign the buildign carrying big roll of cables. the cables to be sue when using nano termite.
the power was cut fiort he entire weeked also the security cameras, orddered to the power central, official, and all security people were tld to stay home for this entitree weekend, and on monday all security dogs were ordered to stay home. security meet up wihtout their dogs.
it is also dick cheney that organised the "fictional" atack on Kowait, the day it actualy happeend..for real...
it was told as being an exervise.
they diuplicated the same sheme here, so that no one in the army wil react to it, thining it was part of the army exervise goign on in that area, that day. energency security system for air in USA say that any plane that deviate its course for over 5 min above a civil area (here a city) will be shot down without warming. it was not done.
i see white lashes all over the footage, which is not of best quality. i have senn a lot of footage so far. and of course of better quality. there are no flashes.
But controlled demolition or not...i guess thats not the main question. If a new investigation proofed, it was not controlled demolition. Would that clear the whole case? Would tha finally answer the question, who is to blame?
Retards I hate goverment as much as any1 buuuttttt, Thats the floors above that point collapsing on the inside first shooting debris out while the main frame falls morons.. jez for real wtf is wrong with yall
funnily enough NIST animations of this collapse show pancaking floors would LEAVE THE MAINFRAME STANDING. There has never been ANY explanation why the core columns were brought down.
FFS ... talk about Moronic.
This video shows anomalies.. of which on 9-11 there were many. Including the bullshit official version. WTF is wrong with you?
So if your right what do we suppose we do? You have all the info, you're so confident you're right, you guys insult everyone who questions you, so if you have all the answers then why isn't this over with already?
I've heard arguments before about sun reflecting on breaking glass due to pressure, paper etc. This vid (and even more convincing others) show quite clearly that there's explosions happening simultaniously in different areas of the building/s WELL below the event, and on some occasions, so prematurely and IN UNISON ON MANY FLOORS, 30/40+ BELOW, BEFORE the collapse event. I've fought on forums, with IRL friends, on radio shows etc for YEARS now about this. I'm losing my strength. OPEN YOUR EYES.
Those white flecks don't look at all like detonation blasts. They're random and they have sharp edges compared to the slightly out-of-focus footage of the towers.
Not only are the little white flecks in the video random (unlike the patterns in a controlled demolition), they are sharp-edged while the rest of the video is blurry, and some occur off to the side of the buildings. Detonation charges in mid-air? LOL
I have a link to a petition on my profile to open up a new investigation into 911, you have the option of remaining anonymous. I have seen many signatures from around the world.
"If you are a real scientist, why would you RULE OUT" - You do not. However to give that theory any credence, you must have some evidence to support it. Unfortunately for the twoofahs, all the available evidence supports the "popular account."
WTC1&2 were hit by hijacked airliners & failed due to structural damage & fire. WTC7 was struck by debris & failed due to structrual damage and fire.
Given the absence of evidence for the "demolition" theory, it is not credible.
Look like some broken glass is reflecting light, indeed.
Don't make any shitty bit of difference though, WTC2 & 1 were blown to kingdom come. This behavior u can witness, that is huge dustclouds in midair, black and white smoke, massive shredding of steel, very little resistance, straight down instead of sideways (as u would expect, since the top started to lean over) strongly indicates some kind of high tech controlled demo.
i agree with the controlled demo part but i think there may have been explosive flashes too.. are you sure glass or steel can reflect light that far and through smoke..
I agree. I am currently debating the whole 9/11 thing with this other guy who thinks it was structural failer and said the same thing, that it looked like reflection from debris. But how would something reflect in the middle of a bunch of dust and smoke? Because you can see those same flashes in the middle of the smoke and dust.
I was just thinking the same thing... I believe that a demolition was required to help those guys come down after the planes hit them... at least something at the underinfrastructure to ensure direct downward movement... but this is obviously edited in and please dont do this fucking crap again, you hurt the truth you cocksucker.
at 0:40, played frame by frame, it is obvious that the flashes are coming from falling debris catching light. watch to the left of the building as the debris flips around and at certain angles these flashes appear. One larger piece of debris flashes twice and is still intact, proving that if these were "charges", they were harmless. But Then why did the building fall so suddenly?
"If you are a real scientist, why would you RULE OUT" - You do not. However to give that theory any credence, you must have some evidence to support it. Unfortunately for the twoofahs, all the available evidence supports the "popular account."
WTC1&2 were hit by hijacked airliners & failed due to structural damage & fire. WTC7 was struck by debris & failed due to structrual damage and fire.
Given the absence of evidence for the "demolition" theory, it is not credible.
CD's don't have flashes going off after the collapse. The flashes you see are just falling debris. Look at :40 to the left of the building you'll see the same flashes in mid air. And from 1:00 on you'll see flashes in the dust cloud well above the collapsing building. Thus proving this is only falling debris catching light
OK everybody take a very close look in the final seconds of the close up, this is where the video completely debunks itself. First ask yourself why are there flashes still going off in the dust cloud well above the already collapsed building. As you look closely you'll notice that these aren't flashes but actually pieces of debris falling end over end catching light from the sun, especially if you slow it down click by click you can see where the flashes happen that the building is still intact
Really did the gov. plant bombs in midair b/c i see flashes to the left of the building at time :40, Demo charges go off before a building starts to fall like in this building watch?v=8U4erFzhC-U
And from your so called explosions come no smoke and the windows are still intact. Just look at the time that i've marked. It's just debris my friend. So stop going to the truther eye doctor, and take off the glasses he gave you. From 1:00 on why can you see it in the dust cloud above the collapse
The whole top of the building tilted off before the collapse and completely fell off 2 secs into the collapse which means there was no weight or pressure being put on the top floor which means a pancake collapse is completely impossible.
Those are clear demolition chargers going off. Charges placed in the right places of the wtc will bring down the towers. All 3 buildings that day had flashes going off including wtc7. Too much of a coincidence.
Sorry peeps but I do not see how this could possibly be a controlled demolition. What happened was a tradegy, you and the other "truthers" out there need to move on already.
Because you 'can't see how' does not mean that it wasn't. There is evidence that it was and because of that, it should not be forgotten and 'moved on' from because the truth remains covered up.
The more you tell yourself these lies, the more you'll believe it. Need proof? Why did you repeat the same sequence over and over again in this video? You are seeing things that just aren't there my friend. Absence of proof is not proof of absence. This is classic argumentum ad ignorantiam (look it up, then come back to reality. We miss you!)
a perfect CD are you an idiot. A perfect CD starts in the basement and only covers its footprint. The twin towers peeled away and covered 8x it's expected footprint. Why don't you ask companies that have actually imploded buildings before and see what they have to say about the towers, like implosionworld or demolitioninc. Most of the clean up crew were demolition experts and they say the reason it took so long is b/c it wasn't a CD and their were large pieces left. Idiot
Give it up, 2muchmark. Get this through your [presumably thick] skull: There was a controlled demolition. Start doing something about it instead of going on youtube and posting stupid comments that add nothing to the discussion.
Laugh away, "2muchmark". Interesting that you still have nothing to add to the discussion. Anyone who can't see that you're a troll is probably about as intelligent as someone who thinks that the 911 Commission did 'a good job'. Leave now. You're embarrassing yourself.
yes they do your the idiot trying to make it sound like it was a inside job. Do you know how much money it took to do a clean up. The people without health care being taken care of go to the hospital. billions of dollars the government doesnt through away billions of dollars
Before you present the idea that I'm an 'idiot' as fact, try to capitalize the first letter of your sentence, you dolt. I'm not 'making it sound' that way. There is plenty of information suggesting that explosives were used in bringing down the World Trade Center. Molten metal, Concrete pulverization, Explosions, Squibs, Flashes, steel beams ejected hundreds of feet outwards, and blasts on the lower floors.
Give up. You've lost the argument already. Continuing would be humorous
Whats even funnier is you try to bring down my knowledge by saying I dont know how to spell. Whats even better is when you modern day hippies realize that it was terrorist groups not government inside job. Stock market dropping billions of dollars spent in clean up. Do you actually think that the governments going to spend billions of dollars on clean up to try to gain in your conspriacy to just gain millions of dollars causing the us to be in debt. Your the idiot thinking its a inside job
Another observation. Since there were a lot of computers and monitors, you think some of the charges in the air could have been from monitors being ejected out into the air, bursting from the heat. Since the monitors were probably on, the gas inside of the monitors went through a short ignition process? Like if a lightbulb gets broken while on? You get a quick flash of light?
I am not arguing if the buildings were brought down by a controlled implosion. What I will comment on, is the flashes of light, which they are indeed there.
At first, they looked like they were small 'squibs' flashing, but I noticed there were a lot of flashes happening away from the building, like in the middle of the air, juxaposed against the blue sky.
So would there be another explination for the flashes of light? Could it be paper or glass reflecting the light?
ummm proof??? lets see, on each floor you have about and acre of space. the impact zone was around 78. so that leaves around 30 more acres to fall directly on the floor beneath them. now ur saying all that pressure wouldn't shoot the air out on the lower floors. also when half the main columns were severed in the crash from a plane traveling around 450 mph there is no need for more explosives. And the striping beams on the outside were also built to support the weight. plane took care of those.
now on this video this was broung down by outside bombs look real close you could see rymitic flashes on the outside of the bulidings look real close and wiend it back a couple of times youll see it it was in fact a coverup we are the insider networt as far as video proof like this
Get a grip, demolition? I've used demo and it doesn't look anything like this. I'm sure you believe area 52 has little green men to. Grow up and realize there are just some crazy people who will crash plane into building and say so on tape by the way. I forgot, the goverment made them do it. Get a kife will you!
Maybe in 30 years or so you might grow a brain to realise 9-11 was a well planned operation designed by NEOCON chickenhawks.
Planes do not defeat buildings.
When planes crash they suffer de-acceleration and DO NOT (repeat) DO NOT brings two over-constructed skyscrapers down. (No matter how much denial you are happy living in).
And you are right, this was like no demolition ever done before. Still doesn't mean it wasn't demolition.
These idiots actually beieve that if a passenger airliner crashes into a building at 400 mph, it would be impossible for it to fall. RETARDS. They actually say to themselves, I know a huge plane slammed into the building but that wasn't the cause of the collapse, lol. It had to be something else. DIPSHITS. Some of them don't even believe planes hit the buildings. Maybe it was Santa Claus.
This is not a Final Fantasy Video. This is real LIFE. Go comment on a gamers page and leave reality for those who live it.
Someone who likes Wrestling Videos and Final Fantasy game sequences is hardly someone with a good grasp on "reality"!! I would suggest you should try commenting more on gamers videos and less on things you know very little about. You sad pathetic little boy.
lol. Did i touch a raw nerve? Seems when you have no intelligent "comeback:" you resort to crude cursing insults.
When you can think of better comebacks than "Shit " and "asshole"... Then you can attempt to take me on. Until then keep your head up your ass, and keep dreaming about Final Fantasy Videos and trolling "wacky conspiracy vids" .
Obviously this channel is a bit deep and intellectual for you SON.
Y go through all of the trouble of flying 2 planes into them and doing it world wide and having over 2,000 ppl die just to be fake?
Ipodtouch95100 4 days ago
Always shitty music on these 9/11 vids
Coolz444 1 week ago
Yo, I noticed this last night when I was watching a documentary which is what brought me to search "WTC flashes". Holy god, this is serious crucial evidence, I'm wondering why you don't see these flashes in other clips shown up close. Maybe the way the buildings surrounding blocked sun light from hitting the windows. The only time you see these flashes is from angles that are elevated, from distant rooftops or choppers.
bravenewduo 2 weeks ago
For all the fuckwits that think the flashes are windows or `glass`, tell me this - how is then that concrete and steel can be blown to dust in an instant but not windows? also tell why the flashes are visible n the shadows, through thick dust AND on the remnants of the CORE as it goes down. ONE more thing, why are you idiots so retarded to call us truthers when all we do is look at the facts, listen to the experts and use our own common sense without listening to government fed bullsit!
bjm351 2 weeks ago
@bjm351 Well said, bro. TRU for life
djundadawg 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Zionist False Flag Operations: 1946 Bombing of King David Hotel, Israelis dressed as Arabs 1954 Levone Affair, Israelis blew up American Instillations in Cairo to blame Egypt 1967 USS Liberty attacked by Israelis, 34 Americans killed 170 wounded, to blame Egypt 1968 US Embassy attacked by Israeli commandos in Amman, to blame Jordan 1986 Berlin Disco bombing by Israel, to blame Lybia 2001 Israel attacks on 9/11. 1st blamed on Palestinians by Mossad Agents Caught on scene. 911 ✡ ✈ ▌▌.
MrMhashim123 3 weeks ago
well theres a flash on the shadowed side of the building so how could it be a reflection
uyoudecide 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Waay too bright to be reflecting glass.
Could it be breaker busses in electrical panels or even big transformers?
You mean the ones behind the metal doors in enclosed closets?
Ha! NOT likely.
GnosticNinja 5 months ago
WAAAY too bright to be reflecting glass.
Could it be breaker busses in electrical panels or even big transformers?
You mean the ones behind the metal doors in enclosed closets?
Ha! NOT likely.
GnosticNinja 5 months ago
@Hotters70603XL, you are defending the government more than I am, friend. I just proved how idiotic (and not to mention contradictory) how most of you conspiracy theorists are so quick to let the general public know that the government is lying but you use documents from that very same government to prove your point. That's very funny to me. Oh and the racist namecalling is a real touch of class. Now focus and hit me back with how the big bad Bus 'sploded the towers. (P.S.: I'm a cracka)
ltrich50 5 months ago
@Hotters70603XL, think, McFly...you are accusing the government of killing it's citizens yet you cite a document that comes from that very same government who at the time of the attacks was part of the Bush administration. Good call man...I sure am convinced now.
ltrich50 5 months ago
@Hotters70603XL The FEMA report? Seriously, you are accusing the government of killing it's own citizens and yet you cite a FEMA report. FEMA, a government agency that brought us ther Katrina response? No fres water, no food, bodies floating in the water. Remember all that?
ltrich50 5 months ago
@azar783402 Sadly most American's have never heard of "Operation Northwoods" and many still have never even heard of "Building 7", Yet they arrogantly think they are fully informed becauce they listen to the controlled Corporate Media... And of course their Government "would never lie to them"
You'd have to be a moron to believe 19 Arab misfits with box-cutters taking orders from a boogeyman in a cave in Afghanistan pulled this off
At least 7 of the 9/11 hijackers are STILL ALIVE for fuck's sake
castle001 5 months ago
Care to rebut that one...you and the rest of your theorist buddies are basing your "demolition theories" on your distrust of the government yet are quick to fire off references to documents like this FEMA appendix. I find that interesting. Either way, you look like a bunch of idiots. Moreover, you piss on the memories of everyone who died on 9/11.
ltrich50 5 months ago
@Hotters70603XL FEMA? The same people who brought us the seamless and professional respose to Hurricane Katrina? Yeah, I sdhould read a document written by those bozos! Nice try.
ltrich50 5 months ago
What kills me is none of you dumbass conspiracy theorists have no clue whatsoever what it takes to perform a controlled demolition. That's what makes this laughable.
ltrich50 5 months ago
@azar783402 What facts? Show me the reports that confirm thermite was used in the collapse of the towers. Do you even know how much thermite you need to get such buildings down? you literally need truckloads full of it. douzens of trucks that dropped off thermite unnoticed? So what people were involved then? You seem to know exactly how it happened, well, tell me how the thermite got into the towers. How many people are involved then, according to you?
MaxwellEindhoven 5 months ago
@azar783402 Dude, you underestimate how hot fires could get and how that has effect to steel. Fire burned for 8 hours with temperatures rising up to 1100 degrees F. Yes not enough to melt it, but it is enough to loose strength and stiffness. Not to mention the damage caused by the collapse of WTC 1. No evidence of explosions is seen at the moment of collapse of WTC 7.
MaxwellEindhoven 5 months ago
@azar783402 So how do you know explosives were placed inside? Have you got evidence? Or do you just assume that?
MaxwellEindhoven 5 months ago
Ok the plane hit at an angle making a huge hole in one corner (meaning two walls) of the tower finally giving away the top of the tower falls now the top remains intact for atleats 7 seconds of the 10 seconds of colapsion now the top is falling at a angle causing the top to push walls out not fall in but out making debri fly away
I mean away from the tower the little clouds of dirt flying out of windows is the affect of air being pushed out of the tower thats how it happened
19rollercoasterfreak 5 months ago
@19rollercoasterfreak good answer.
ltrich50 5 months ago
People are so gullible and stupid. Clearly not a civil engineer in the bunch of idiots. Truthers are a bunch of nutcases. That includes Alec Baldwin
wayofthesea 5 months ago
@azar783402 Do you know how WTC 7 was build? It had only three main trusses holding the building up, once one of them failed, it pulled the rest of the building with it.
MaxwellEindhoven 5 months ago
@azar783402 "Steel flowing like lava"
Can you name one firefighter that has ever reported molten steel, flowing like lava in the WTC rubble? I want their full quote, please.
MazJax 5 months ago
@MazJax watch?v=afZaK8zVbUw&feature=related
castle001 5 months ago
@azar783402
It's easy to say that every skyscraper that has had unprotected infernos burning for an hour with weakened steel infrastructures has collapsed.
"7 contained barely any damage and had small fires"
WHAT A HORRENDOUS LIE! Look at the south side of the tower, please! Nothing but smoke and fire. And you can clearly see the 50 tonne chunk of steel from the North Tower that hit 10 of its floors.
"Precisely vertical collapse"
It fell slightly to the south-east.
MazJax 5 months ago
@azar783402 , Yes it did! The collapse of WTC 1 caused lots of damage to the southwest side of WTC 7. Then came the fires. The building burned uncontrollable for 8 hours. At some points steel was heated up to 1100 degrees F. Enough to loose strength and stiffness.
MaxwellEindhoven 5 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven Good points, you clearly know the subject.
Funny thing is, the "squibs" many people see in the corner, AREN'T squibs! They're broken windows and jagged holes from WTC1 debris. It's clearly seen in HD pictures of that corner (as well as the infernos, and smoke, which twoofers tend to ignore.)
Squibs leave very distinct, dark, powerful debris and smoke trails. Twoofers ignore this. There was a gentle, weak amount of smoke due to air pressure blowing debris out of those holes.
MazJax 5 months ago
@MazJax Exactly, none of the so called "truthers" seem to be aware of the phenomenon "air pressure" and immediatly say it was a controlled demolition.
MaxwellEindhoven 5 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven Barium nitrate & sulfur are part of the military patent on what is known as thermate (thermite with sulfur & barium nitrate added), Barium is a very toxic metal, so one would not expect it to be present in the large concentrations in WTC dust.
Thermite reactions produce molten iron which was seen pouring out of the Towers. Pools of molten iron were still being found under the Twin Towers & Building 7 rubble up to 6 weeks after 9/11.
castle001 5 months ago
@castle001 Dude, the "iron" pouring down the South Tower was aluminum from the airplane, aluminum has a much lower melting point. The structural steel of the towers never melted. The hot glowing metals found in the rubble of Ground Zero were found even weeks after 9/11. Don't you think metal would cool down once it's melted? It would solidify within seconds. It was glowing hot metal because there were fires inside the rubble for weeks!
MaxwellEindhoven 5 months ago
When someone posts a video and then starts swearing and having a hissy fit when challenged, just shows that this video and that person is not worth wasting energy and time on. I'm open to all arguments but this video shows nothing and the person posting it adds nothing, move on people.
gloryofistanbul 5 months ago
@azar783402 You just keep repeating yourself dickhead. This one video isn't enough proof. You just see little flashes, but there's no evidence the flashes are charges going off. It's most likely just the glass shattering and reflecting sunlight. Have you got any other (real) evidence besides this video?
MaxwellEindhoven 5 months ago
starting from about 0:37-0:42 you can even see these flashes off the sides of the building in mid air
jackdawak 5 months ago
look im all for this conspiracy thing but look at the video man....the "flashes" are still flashing in spots above where the building is falling....the top portion of the building has already dropped and flashes are still going off above it within the smoke....looks more like a reflection of paper than actual charges going off....get a better quality video
jackdawak 5 months ago
@azar783402 Well, it's not a surprise the site was sealed off, it was a massive crime scene. And yes, somebody has to clean up the mess. But where's the evidence of charges going off?
MaxwellEindhoven 5 months ago
@azar783402 Well, once again, where is the evidence of your claim? There was no molten steel, it was some sort of metal, but it is never investigated. It's unlikely the structural steel melted, since the temperature weren't high enough. The fuselage of the plane was made from aluminum, which has a much lower meltingpoint.. That did melt, we saw it dripping down the facade of the South Tower. Now answer my questions then, if you are so sure of charges going off.
MaxwellEindhoven 5 months ago
@azar783402 One video isn't enough you idiot! Whay type of material has been used? How has it been used? Who used it? How much has been used? If you have evidence you can answer these questions...
MaxwellEindhoven 5 months ago
@azar783402 So where's the evidence of your claims, all you're saying is I'm ignorant...
MaxwellEindhoven 5 months ago
@azar783402 I only use logic and common sence, it seems you don't. If you're so sure of your claim, proof it.
MaxwellEindhoven 6 months ago
@azar783402 You choose to use this one video as your evidence? Because you think you see something in a vague video you assume you are right? You are ignoring the the truth to confirm your fantasies. Apparently you know nothing about controlled demolition, have you ever been to a real demolition of a skyscraper? You need tons of explosives, and really tons of it. Truckloads full of dynamite, you think it was stored in the buildings unnoticed? Have you got ANY evidence of a CD? No you don't.
MaxwellEindhoven 6 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven keep smokin that weed mon - bin laden crushed the towers yeh
mooners40 6 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven perhaps active thermitic material found in the dust is a clue - and the fact that the building blew up all over manhattan and was reduced to dust - and the fact that for upper floors to crush lower floors the upper floors would need to be indestructible - and yet they are made of the same material - newton's third law requires an equal and opposite reaction to an action - so top floors would be destroyed and could never destroy all the way to the bottom - physics-
mooners40 6 months ago
@azar783402 No there is no evidence. Where is it? I haven't seen it. Nobody has! Only some shit people made up to feel like an anarchist, to fight agains the authorities. And people are dumb enough to believe that instead of the confirmed official report.
MaxwellEindhoven 6 months ago
@azar783402 Dude, it wasn't. If it was, proof your claim, and not just by a crappy video like this one above. I know you can't, nobody can.
MaxwellEindhoven 6 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven you're so fucking stupid. you're so close minded and clueless about your country, fucking dumbass. it was a inside job. nuff said
stuffguy2 6 months ago
@stuffguy2 Close minded about MY country? I'm from the Netherlands dumbass, if one country in the world isn't close minded it's the Netherlands.
MaxwellEindhoven 6 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven ,
Your kidding right? Your country was one of the FIRST to sign up to Bush's "coalition of the willing" , Your country has a political party that makes it quite clear they hate muslims or any dark skin people, Many of countrymen have left the Netherlands for that very reason and now reside in New Zealand because they thought no dark skin people lived here UNTIL they discover Maori and Pacific Island people do live here an then all they want to do is moan about it
dobberdoss 6 months ago
@dobberdoss dude, you know nothing about our political system. Please search "gedoogsteun" on google.
MaxwellEindhoven 6 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven ,
Only what our dutch friends here have explained to us? Some not so much our friends after hearing these views
dobberdoss 5 months ago
@azar783402 No it wasn't dumbass, there's not even proof of the CD, so shut the fuck up.
MaxwellEindhoven 6 months ago
The buildings had tons of glass on the facade. They're bound to break and reflect sunlight when the buildings collapsed.
MaxwellEindhoven 6 months ago
to all the idiots saying these were charges, no, its window panes google how far away you can see reflections on glass and youll undesrtand... ffs
KHK14 6 months ago
that flash was a paine of glass falling.
dann756 7 months ago
@Faelinroma Uses film? Uh dude news cameras stopped using film in about 1978
roquefortfiles 11 months ago
0:51
WHAT THE FUCK
..........I'm waiting for one of these Pro-American Dick Head Texans to come and try to explain those flashes all along the floor awaiting to collapse...
Jordans03 11 months ago
One flicker in a few windows as the towers fall...that's your proof?
You fail to realize that there would be multiple flashes in succession leading to the collapse, and they wouldn't be falling from the top first
You have no idea how a controlled demolition works
CrazyRay7979 11 months ago
@CrazyRay7979
please explain
Jordans03 11 months ago
Comment removed
CrazyRay7979 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Jordans03
Watch a video of a controlled demolition, watch several, then you'll see what a real controlled demolition looks like
Very loud explosions seen across a wide span of windows as seen in a controlled demolition vs. a silent poof of light in a single window as seen on 9/11
CrazyRay7979 10 months ago
@CrazyRay7979
and it seems, neither do you, Theirs more ways to skin a cat
catwoman1951 10 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 this was a top down demolition - not the usual style - to fool fools - you were fooled
mooners40 9 months ago
@mooners40 Proof it dumbass. You are only fooling yourself by calling it a controlled demolition.
MaxwellEindhoven 6 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven look up Richard Gage on you tube and click on the very first video you see
username7046 6 months ago
@username7046 Why?
MaxwellEindhoven 6 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven b/c he proves why it was demolition thats why
username7046 6 months ago
@username7046 No he doesn't, he has only a theory of what happened in his opinion. It was no controlled demolition so this richard gage is talking bollocks!
MaxwellEindhoven 6 months ago
Comment removed
AABaterys 1 year ago
@AABaterys suck jewish ashkeNAZI DICK you bastard
bosasosolja 1 year ago
by the way this is a shit example of the explosions going off have seen one's slowed down to a ms in hd where u seen the blasts
xgavfitzpatx 1 year ago
I have been reseaching the BILDERBERGS. for the past couple of year's .. they caused it .. just like rothchild caused and profit'ed from ever war since the 1700's.(the rothchilds and rockafellers( BILDERBERGS) are the key mover's in modern day Imperialist..... dont fight war's. they get other's to create them .. and they just profit. now throught the USA war's and the creation of derivates on the stock market and the ression they will soon own america .. lock .. stock and barel
xgavfitzpatx 1 year ago
@IAmReallyAwesome0 really I bet you had to look hard to be able to pull that one out ur arse! take your head out from where the sun dont shine, sonnie.
sksnkton 1 year ago
Comment removed
sksnkton 1 year ago
everyone can do the math. super reinforged steel structures cant freefall down through them self witout the aid of explosives... think ppl think...
hostesaft83 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The flashes of charge are glass shattering and cracking off due to weight and distortion in its frame from the falling weight above
Explosion inside buildings will not just crack the odd glass here and there.
copycat0070 1 year ago
The flashes of charge are glass shattering and cracking off due to weight and distortion in its frame from the falling weight above above.
Explosion inside buildings will not just crack the odd glass here and there.
copycat0070 1 year ago
Its the windows breaking, the glass is just catching the sunlight is all, not a controlled demolition
mosleywade 1 year ago
Unbelievable!
kjk3000 1 year ago
watch?v=LQYFABSlCQ4
This is the best demo sequence so far.
ed11561 1 year ago
Look at both of these buildings in the beginning.BLACK SMOKE-which is a sign of an oxygen starved fire which means that there
are barely any FLAMES which inturn means that is here r no flames then no way in hell is steel heating up & no way for these buildings to collapse due to fire.All rubbish.The flashes show how these buildings were exploded.
May u burn in hell Bush.Thanks for taking a 1 1/2 month vacation after PUTIN warned u of exactly what was going to happen,who was going to do it,etc.
ed11561 1 year ago
It amazes me that the american people cant even recognize an explosion when they see it. The black smoke is from the fire and the white is from the explosion of the entire building. Look up krakatoa on how things work .. amazing
katlovesall 1 year ago
how does this video only have 9,417 views and other videos showing the flashes have a low number of views?
neobumner 2 years ago
Most people don't even know who was in charge of WORLD TRADE CENTER SECURITY for 2 years and their contract expired September 11, 2001.
Go ahead and look. The answer is : MARVIN BUSH.
Total coincidence, I'm sure ;)
marcpinke 2 years ago
Thats just a cover for the real security of the WTC. Kroll was brought in to revamp security after the 93 attack.
Thy are owned by Marsh and McLennan now, the impact zone of American Airlines 11. Might I add that they were both at the center of 9/11 insider trading being processed in the buildings before the collapse....
cancanbiker 1 year ago
surely if these flashes were indeed a series of demolition explosions... wouldnt there be a big explosion, sound.. things like that... not just a little flash in a window? (not that i dont think this was an inside job... i have reserched into this for bout 2 years)
XlilminxX 2 years ago
explosions were heard for wtc tower 7 and reported by firemen, also for tower 2.
remember there was aot of noise, everywhere forn the towers, look at news info form back then before the towers fall, in the hours preceding it, you can hear a huge noise spreading. coverign everything, even reporter at 100 meters from it had to shout to can make comments, and all witnesses told they could hear this noise far away form the WTC.
it was planed there is no doubt about it.
SophieOcean 2 years ago
power cut the weekend before this hapend (it was a monday morning) where "workers" in workers clothes were seen entering and leavign the buildign carrying big roll of cables. the cables to be sue when using nano termite.
the power was cut fiort he entire weeked also the security cameras, orddered to the power central, official, and all security people were tld to stay home for this entitree weekend, and on monday all security dogs were ordered to stay home. security meet up wihtout their dogs.
SophieOcean 2 years ago
those dogs could smell explosive charges and will have smell that entruder had entered forbidden areas. therefor.
it was all planed.
all the directign staff of wtc, directors and actinaries and leadign personals, didnt meet up at all that day. they remained home.
why is that?
they were warned.
there was a military operation foign on planed by dick chney jsut beside it
this operation was ment to imitate a fictional attack onm WTC! therefor no army plane shooted the plane that crashed wtc
SophieOcean 2 years ago
it is also dick cheney that organised the "fictional" atack on Kowait, the day it actualy happeend..for real...
it was told as being an exervise.
they diuplicated the same sheme here, so that no one in the army wil react to it, thining it was part of the army exervise goign on in that area, that day. energency security system for air in USA say that any plane that deviate its course for over 5 min above a civil area (here a city) will be shot down without warming. it was not done.
SophieOcean 2 years ago
all planes above america whos piuporpose was ot crash into somehting reached their goasl.
except those that couldnt leave gorund as bloked by the control and those where th terrorist had cold feet.
but therer was no other explosion that WTC, no other attacts.
they prenteded one plane crash had happened on the pentagon, but there is no pictures of a palne crashing on the pentagon nor of rest of a planes.
but there is several viodeo footage of missile shooted on the pentagon.
SophieOcean 2 years ago
An american army missile, recognised and confirmed by several army generals.
SophieOcean 2 years ago
@XlilminxX There was sounds of demolition when the towers came down but there is no sound in this video.
ed11561 1 year ago
i see white lashes all over the footage, which is not of best quality. i have senn a lot of footage so far. and of course of better quality. there are no flashes.
But controlled demolition or not...i guess thats not the main question. If a new investigation proofed, it was not controlled demolition. Would that clear the whole case? Would tha finally answer the question, who is to blame?
muskabo 2 years ago
Retards I hate goverment as much as any1 buuuttttt, Thats the floors above that point collapsing on the inside first shooting debris out while the main frame falls morons.. jez for real wtf is wrong with yall
cmike41880 2 years ago
Do you understand what you just wrote?
"....while the main frame falls ....."
funnily enough NIST animations of this collapse show pancaking floors would LEAVE THE MAINFRAME STANDING. There has never been ANY explanation why the core columns were brought down.
FFS ... talk about Moronic.
This video shows anomalies.. of which on 9-11 there were many. Including the bullshit official version. WTF is wrong with you?
AussiAmerican 2 years ago
So if your right what do we suppose we do? You have all the info, you're so confident you're right, you guys insult everyone who questions you, so if you have all the answers then why isn't this over with already?
MrYahoost 2 years ago
I've heard arguments before about sun reflecting on breaking glass due to pressure, paper etc. This vid (and even more convincing others) show quite clearly that there's explosions happening simultaniously in different areas of the building/s WELL below the event, and on some occasions, so prematurely and IN UNISON ON MANY FLOORS, 30/40+ BELOW, BEFORE the collapse event. I've fought on forums, with IRL friends, on radio shows etc for YEARS now about this. I'm losing my strength. OPEN YOUR EYES.
Soulstorm9000 2 years ago
Those white flecks don't look at all like detonation blasts. They're random and they have sharp edges compared to the slightly out-of-focus footage of the towers.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
look at another video of controlled demoliton and you will see nearly exactly the same flashes, wake up america.....
SaveEurope82 2 years ago 2
Explain...."random". Demolition blasts happen at key joints, not like a lights show display.
Watch a demolition of a building and you'll see that there is no particular "Marry Chirstmas" pattern to it.
OMG. They were clearly cutting the floor and column joints.
Wake up, kid.
dawson01912 2 years ago
Not only are the little white flecks in the video random (unlike the patterns in a controlled demolition), they are sharp-edged while the rest of the video is blurry, and some occur off to the side of the buildings. Detonation charges in mid-air? LOL
PoetryHound 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have a link to a petition on my profile to open up a new investigation into 911, you have the option of remaining anonymous. I have seen many signatures from around the world.
Please sign and help spread the word.
Many thanks.
1,575 signatures so far !!
cosmicmind1 2 years ago
Well I didnt see anythin on this clip better watch Zeitgeist the movie it explains it all
Aaidas2 2 years ago
incredible!
merrimac291 2 years ago
dtx_GcFCs6c
fake or controlled demolition?
freidenki 2 years ago
conotoxin writes:
"However to give that theory any credence, you must have some evidence to support it."
Yes indeed, how'bout all the available video evidence, for starters?
"Unfortunately for the twoofahs, all the available evidence supports the "popular account.""
U must mean, "was made to fit" to support the official account. ;-) The rest that didn't was quickly destroyed.
U obviously don't know shit about available evidence, credible evidence, and NIST's fraudulent report.
Sandberg1972 3 years ago
"If you are a real scientist, why would you RULE OUT" - You do not. However to give that theory any credence, you must have some evidence to support it. Unfortunately for the twoofahs, all the available evidence supports the "popular account."
WTC1&2 were hit by hijacked airliners & failed due to structural damage & fire. WTC7 was struck by debris & failed due to structrual damage and fire.
Given the absence of evidence for the "demolition" theory, it is not credible.
conotoxin 3 years ago
Look like some broken glass is reflecting light, indeed.
Don't make any shitty bit of difference though, WTC2 & 1 were blown to kingdom come. This behavior u can witness, that is huge dustclouds in midair, black and white smoke, massive shredding of steel, very little resistance, straight down instead of sideways (as u would expect, since the top started to lean over) strongly indicates some kind of high tech controlled demo.
Doesn't like like a "natural" collapse at all.
Sandberg1972 3 years ago
i agree with the controlled demo part but i think there may have been explosive flashes too.. are you sure glass or steel can reflect light that far and through smoke..
johnmady7 3 years ago
I agree. I am currently debating the whole 9/11 thing with this other guy who thinks it was structural failer and said the same thing, that it looked like reflection from debris. But how would something reflect in the middle of a bunch of dust and smoke? Because you can see those same flashes in the middle of the smoke and dust.
kevo1120 3 years ago 2
I was just thinking the same thing... I believe that a demolition was required to help those guys come down after the planes hit them... at least something at the underinfrastructure to ensure direct downward movement... but this is obviously edited in and please dont do this fucking crap again, you hurt the truth you cocksucker.
medivh421 3 years ago
I could use adobe after effects and make this much more believable because this looks like a joke.
coug9770 3 years ago
frickinjim:at 0:40, played frame by frame, it is obvious that the flashes are coming from falling debris catching light<<<
I can clearly see explosions coming out of the smoke and dust. there is only few sunlight to be reflected.
freidenki 3 years ago
at 0:40, played frame by frame, it is obvious that the flashes are coming from falling debris catching light. watch to the left of the building as the debris flips around and at certain angles these flashes appear. One larger piece of debris flashes twice and is still intact, proving that if these were "charges", they were harmless. But Then why did the building fall so suddenly?
frickinjim 3 years ago
"If you are a real scientist, why would you RULE OUT" - You do not. However to give that theory any credence, you must have some evidence to support it. Unfortunately for the twoofahs, all the available evidence supports the "popular account."
WTC1&2 were hit by hijacked airliners & failed due to structural damage & fire. WTC7 was struck by debris & failed due to structrual damage and fire.
Given the absence of evidence for the "demolition" theory, it is not credible.
conotoxin 3 years ago
Once again, absence of evidence does not equal evidence of absence.
And if you're going to talk method of discovery and science. then you should actually follow the scientific method.
The SM has 4 parts:
-Characterizations - observe, define, and measure.
-Hypotheses - hypothetical explanations of observations and measurements
- Predictions - Logical deduction
- Experiments - To prove or disprove Predictions
The problem you have is you've only covered the 2nd step.
What about #1,3, & 4?
socratescafe 3 years ago
here's another home video that caught a few demo charges. watch?v=R42toIg9tto
Piscivorus 3 years ago
please heafer
stop embarassing yourself...
how the hell can that be debris....reflecting light ?
please heafer...
stop being pathetic as well
saxoniano 3 years ago
During control demoltions flashes still go off after building has collapsed. Exact same thing on 9/11.
kevin604bc 3 years ago
CD's don't have flashes going off after the collapse. The flashes you see are just falling debris. Look at :40 to the left of the building you'll see the same flashes in mid air. And from 1:00 on you'll see flashes in the dust cloud well above the collapsing building. Thus proving this is only falling debris catching light
heafers84 3 years ago
OK everybody take a very close look in the final seconds of the close up, this is where the video completely debunks itself. First ask yourself why are there flashes still going off in the dust cloud well above the already collapsed building. As you look closely you'll notice that these aren't flashes but actually pieces of debris falling end over end catching light from the sun, especially if you slow it down click by click you can see where the flashes happen that the building is still intact
heafers84 3 years ago
Bullshit.
motonegros 3 years ago
heafers
you are embarassing yourself...
debris ? get an eye doctor !!
saxoniano 3 years ago
Really did the gov. plant bombs in midair b/c i see flashes to the left of the building at time :40, Demo charges go off before a building starts to fall like in this building watch?v=8U4erFzhC-U
And from your so called explosions come no smoke and the windows are still intact. Just look at the time that i've marked. It's just debris my friend. So stop going to the truther eye doctor, and take off the glasses he gave you. From 1:00 on why can you see it in the dust cloud above the collapse
heafers84 3 years ago
The whole top of the building tilted off before the collapse and completely fell off 2 secs into the collapse which means there was no weight or pressure being put on the top floor which means a pancake collapse is completely impossible.
kevin604bc 3 years ago
Those are clear demolition chargers going off. Charges placed in the right places of the wtc will bring down the towers. All 3 buildings that day had flashes going off including wtc7. Too much of a coincidence.
kevin604bc 3 years ago
Sorry peeps but I do not see how this could possibly be a controlled demolition. What happened was a tradegy, you and the other "truthers" out there need to move on already.
2muchmark 3 years ago
2muchmark:
Because you 'can't see how' does not mean that it wasn't. There is evidence that it was and because of that, it should not be forgotten and 'moved on' from because the truth remains covered up.
GreatHakuProductions 3 years ago
That building had more steel reinforcement than a battleship, it was built to take MULTIPLE HITS BY AIRLINERS!
Not only was it controlled demolition, but it was PROFESSIONAL AND PERFECT CD.
motonegros 3 years ago
The more you tell yourself these lies, the more you'll believe it. Need proof? Why did you repeat the same sequence over and over again in this video? You are seeing things that just aren't there my friend. Absence of proof is not proof of absence. This is classic argumentum ad ignorantiam (look it up, then come back to reality. We miss you!)
2muchmark 3 years ago
a perfect CD are you an idiot. A perfect CD starts in the basement and only covers its footprint. The twin towers peeled away and covered 8x it's expected footprint. Why don't you ask companies that have actually imploded buildings before and see what they have to say about the towers, like implosionworld or demolitioninc. Most of the clean up crew were demolition experts and they say the reason it took so long is b/c it wasn't a CD and their were large pieces left. Idiot
heafers84 3 years ago
Give it up douchbags. Get this through your skulls: There was no controlled demolition. Get over it, get used to it, get on with your life.
2muchmark 3 years ago
2muchmark:
Give it up, 2muchmark. Get this through your [presumably thick] skull: There was a controlled demolition. Start doing something about it instead of going on youtube and posting stupid comments that add nothing to the discussion.
GreatHakuProductions 3 years ago
Hahahahahahahahahahaha...
2muchmark 3 years ago
"Hahahahahahahahahahaha"
Laugh away, "2muchmark". Interesting that you still have nothing to add to the discussion. Anyone who can't see that you're a troll is probably about as intelligent as someone who thinks that the 911 Commission did 'a good job'. Leave now. You're embarrassing yourself.
GreatHakuProductions 3 years ago
HMMM.... here is a thought...Window Glasses popping out, as the building frame bents and squeezes downward?
tkinbk 3 years ago
Sorry, tkinbk. Glass windows don't make spontaneous flashes when they're broken.
GreatHakuProductions 3 years ago
yes they do your the idiot trying to make it sound like it was a inside job. Do you know how much money it took to do a clean up. The people without health care being taken care of go to the hospital. billions of dollars the government doesnt through away billions of dollars
sharpshot411 3 years ago
sharpshot411:
Before you present the idea that I'm an 'idiot' as fact, try to capitalize the first letter of your sentence, you dolt. I'm not 'making it sound' that way. There is plenty of information suggesting that explosives were used in bringing down the World Trade Center. Molten metal, Concrete pulverization, Explosions, Squibs, Flashes, steel beams ejected hundreds of feet outwards, and blasts on the lower floors.
Give up. You've lost the argument already. Continuing would be humorous
GreatHakuProductions 3 years ago
Whats even funnier is you try to bring down my knowledge by saying I dont know how to spell. Whats even better is when you modern day hippies realize that it was terrorist groups not government inside job. Stock market dropping billions of dollars spent in clean up. Do you actually think that the governments going to spend billions of dollars on clean up to try to gain in your conspriacy to just gain millions of dollars causing the us to be in debt. Your the idiot thinking its a inside job
sharpshot411 3 years ago
Just goes to show you. The government is not there to protect us. In fact quite the opposite.
AnglesReject 3 years ago
Another observation. Since there were a lot of computers and monitors, you think some of the charges in the air could have been from monitors being ejected out into the air, bursting from the heat. Since the monitors were probably on, the gas inside of the monitors went through a short ignition process? Like if a lightbulb gets broken while on? You get a quick flash of light?
CAPACAP444 3 years ago
I am not arguing if the buildings were brought down by a controlled implosion. What I will comment on, is the flashes of light, which they are indeed there.
At first, they looked like they were small 'squibs' flashing, but I noticed there were a lot of flashes happening away from the building, like in the middle of the air, juxaposed against the blue sky.
So would there be another explination for the flashes of light? Could it be paper or glass reflecting the light?
CAPACAP444 3 years ago
A few arrows would've been of more help than the irrelevant music. Those flashes are hard to distinguish from sunlight reflecting off office paper.
VCat2006 3 years ago 3
It's a great thing to be skeptical...
But being skeptical in the light of the first decent evidence presented and calling it "conspiracy theories" is too little too late.
Be skeptical of your government and their interests. They have profited from this. They got you to approve of the war you didn't want to approve.
Challenge them! They will call you anti-patriotic for it but your conscience will know where your allegiance is.
May we bring truth and peace to the world!
kungfumarie69 3 years ago 11
ummm proof??? lets see, on each floor you have about and acre of space. the impact zone was around 78. so that leaves around 30 more acres to fall directly on the floor beneath them. now ur saying all that pressure wouldn't shoot the air out on the lower floors. also when half the main columns were severed in the crash from a plane traveling around 450 mph there is no need for more explosives. And the striping beams on the outside were also built to support the weight. plane took care of those.
dasupercraziness 3 years ago
to be honest i dont think anyone gives a crap bout wat ur sayin. mph this and acres that, if you dont belive it then just say i dont believe it jeez
123CorpseBride321 3 years ago
now on this video this was broung down by outside bombs look real close you could see rymitic flashes on the outside of the bulidings look real close and wiend it back a couple of times youll see it it was in fact a coverup we are the insider networt as far as video proof like this
stingray300m 3 years ago
The implications are quite frightening...
motonegros 3 years ago
plese don't B a dick
39uje39u3u9 3 years ago
39uje39u3u9 Please stick to WWF wrestling and Gaming videos and leave the serious stuff for grownups. Thats a good kid. Now run along now.
Nephilim70 3 years ago 14
Get a grip, demolition? I've used demo and it doesn't look anything like this. I'm sure you believe area 52 has little green men to. Grow up and realize there are just some crazy people who will crash plane into building and say so on tape by the way. I forgot, the goverment made them do it. Get a kife will you!
masonwoodward 3 years ago
Stick to guitar riffs Mason....
Maybe in 30 years or so you might grow a brain to realise 9-11 was a well planned operation designed by NEOCON chickenhawks.
Planes do not defeat buildings.
When planes crash they suffer de-acceleration and DO NOT (repeat) DO NOT brings two over-constructed skyscrapers down. (No matter how much denial you are happy living in).
And you are right, this was like no demolition ever done before. Still doesn't mean it wasn't demolition.
GeneticFilms08 3 years ago
Doesn't mean it was either, DIPSHIT.
Smacked980 3 years ago
FBI living next to 9-11 Hijackers for months before hand.
Multiple Mossad and Israeli arrests on Sept 11 in New York and surrounds. (Most with live truck bombs ready to detonate.)
And poor widdle Mason here still beleives in fairytales, tooth fairies and box cutting hijackers.
Grow up Mason. That was disproven years ago. Thats why they needed Khalid Sheik Mohammed. No-one is dumb enough to still trust the official story.
AussiAmerican 3 years ago
Get a grip Mason.
The only "crazy people" that cant fly a cessna but can execute expert turns in commercial aircraft.
The only "crazy people" who believe that story are still stuck on the stupid official story which to this day has no evidence to support it.
OzBoyFiles 3 years ago
These idiots actually beieve that if a passenger airliner crashes into a building at 400 mph, it would be impossible for it to fall. RETARDS. They actually say to themselves, I know a huge plane slammed into the building but that wasn't the cause of the collapse, lol. It had to be something else. DIPSHITS. Some of them don't even believe planes hit the buildings. Maybe it was Santa Claus.
Smacked980 3 years ago
I can't wait to come back in a few weeks and see all of the thumbs down I get, lol. JACKASSES.
Smacked980 3 years ago
This is a good vid I see a flash on the left face below the collapse front.and many later in the debri cloud.
I dont see that this evidence meshes with the officiall line in any way.
ezranpee 3 years ago
no question the slo mo really is good to see each floor's explosion also a figure in the dust at 101
cajohn54 3 years ago
Look kids another crazy bleeding heart whacko!
2204Alpha 3 years ago
"lights of the building" eh? Wow.. we really attract some Einsteins with a video like this.
Nephilim70 4 years ago
They are the lights of the building, dumbass.
copyright12222111155 4 years ago
This is not a Final Fantasy Video. This is real LIFE. Go comment on a gamers page and leave reality for those who live it.
Someone who likes Wrestling Videos and Final Fantasy game sequences is hardly someone with a good grasp on "reality"!! I would suggest you should try commenting more on gamers videos and less on things you know very little about. You sad pathetic little boy.
Nephilim70 4 years ago
Don't question my intelligence on ''reality'', asshole. Your arguement is shit. Comeback when you have REAL evidence to support your theory.
I suppose you are also one of those idiots who believe that we didn't land on the moon, are you not?
copyright12222111155 4 years ago
lol. Did i touch a raw nerve? Seems when you have no intelligent "comeback:" you resort to crude cursing insults.
When you can think of better comebacks than "Shit " and "asshole"... Then you can attempt to take me on. Until then keep your head up your ass, and keep dreaming about Final Fantasy Videos and trolling "wacky conspiracy vids" .
Obviously this channel is a bit deep and intellectual for you SON.
Go switch off your Nintendo and read a book.
Nephilim70 4 years ago