The Egyptians were not black but a multi-ethnic society with most of them having their roots from the middle east. It was NOT a black empire no matter what you might think and Carthaginians were Phoenicians not Africans, so they were not a majority of blacks either. The ancients didn't even have a notion of race but of citizenship, so most citizens in Rome, Greece, and Eygpt were mixed and were not pure anything. Stop bending history because you want to prove that blacks invented civilization.
@Xadryn18 So are we meant to take your word for this you fool! Give me evidence to back up your words? I guarantee you dont have any! Who told you that Phoenicians or Carthaginians weren't black? If I was you I would read what the writers of the day wrote about how these people looked? Egypt being mixed is correct but only to a certain point! Prove black people didn't have a major role in the foundations of civilization? I dont think you have any idea what you are talking about....
Why are all bio-pics about Africa presented with white or smelly Arabs/Persians as the ones, didn't you here of how Alexander the Great destroyed the Sphinx's nose because the nose was a black man's nose.
Those people in the Middle East there history has been giftwrapped and bestowed upon them by angry know good Willie Lynch, before that Socrates got his ideas and philosophy from Africa, and Asia it's all real. It's just like in the bible all stories are of whites, but are in Africa---CRAZY
in the Middle East is the cradle of civilizations , We are proud we are Arabs and Muslims, my grandparents Developed Europe .it is not Alexander the Great destroyed the Sphinx's nose it was Napoleon but you did not Read history :)
@hanybal007 Eurpoean shcolars make out it was an iconoclasm Arab named Muhammad Sa'im al-Dahr. A Sufi Muslim fanatic from the khanqah of Sa'id al-Su'ada! In 1378 CE. They even went as far to say an Egyptian Arab historian named al-Maqrīzī, wrote about it in the 15th century CE! Now here is where it gets good. Between that time to Napoleon many artist have drawn the Sphinx i.e Louis Francois Cassas in 1790 CE.
@hanybal007 I also will correct you sir. It wasn't Arabs who solely Developed Europe! It was the Moors with a hint of Arab influence! They occupation in Al-Andalus only came to an end because Black Moors & Arabs couldn't get along. City by City the whites Spanish took overall control. At this point the white Spanish need the moors, Jews & Arabs to educate them. Once this happened they were all kicked out
@Evenson71 I caught that too - had to roll back the video just to double check. France and Spain? I think not! Gaul and Hispania is what they were called then. That's such a fundamental miss I couldn't believe it.
Hannibal was from a prominent politically involved family in Carthage.such families were strictly from Tyrio-Phoenician origins (actual Lebanon) and were by no means African.at best they could have been pale to brownish skin with curly hair and dark or colored eyes (What you call a Mediterranean type nowadays) for more accurate portrait just take a look at the Lebanese of today (the Syrians, the Palestinians and the Hebrews my also give you a good indicator of how he would have looked like)
@salimzwein Why do you people keep talking like the people who occupy these areas today were the people who occupied those areas then? Ancient Hebrews were BLACK!! If you dont know how white jews came about then you have no business even voice anything here!!!
@amaribling if it makes you sleep at night..but the fact is: the actual Jews priest families can trace their genealogy back to King Saul ..and they are not black..the other proof is the Assyrian bas-relief representing Jehu kneeling at the feet of the the Assyrians king or the Hebrews being deported or the siege of Jerusalem they all represent the Hebrews as being people with Mediterranean features , and the Assyrians were maniacs when it comes to details. add to that the bible references..
@salimzwein Please. Educated people know how white Europeans came to become JEWS!!! Im not even gonna waste my time with that CRAP!!!! I refuse to be spun with lies. Hebrews, Canaanites and Phoenicians were black & Asian people.Canaanites were more black. Jerusalem only became white when Britian & USA fucked the Palestinians and let the Khazarians commit Genocide and concentration camps. Ironic concentration camps being the key word....
@amaribling is that the best you could do? please Google Egyptian and Assyrian bas relief showing Canaanites and Hebrews. you will find, to your great dismay, that they were fair to brown skinned (typically Mediterranean) not black nor negroid. some even are portrayed to have blue eyes although it was a rarity yet even the scriptures talk about that rare eye color occurrence..but none was black..sorry bro you have to live with that
@salimzwein Dickhead. Keyword Google! What a fool you are to come on here and talk to me about google when I speak of written accounts of people from the day events took place. Witness accounts, herodotus, diodorus siculus even phogagous? These men have been discredited by morden scholars to fool people and keep the myth the white man has always been on top. Go away and dont talk to me again, man without knowledge....
@amaribling I love it :) when you lose your argument you start using dirty words..that just killed me (from laughter)..honey if I asked you to Google it is because obviously you are totally unable to read (or find) a true research book worth of that name..as for the accounts you are citing you should hold them with nuance: Romans used to treat all non Romans as barbarians, and any skin color darker than their as dark skin..add to that the bias of years of transcriptions in European courts
@salimzwein How dear you talk of romans! If it wasnt for the black moors and Black & white jews of Al-Andalus you wouldn't know shit FACT! Romans respected civilizations that were ancient to theirs. Barbarians? Why are you talking about barbarians? Look you have read what ive been talking about on here for months I assume? Well if you think that North Africa has always been white please provide sources to back this? Glad you found humor as I try my best.....
@amaribling I believe in freedom of speech so I dare speak of anything, I beg you pardon. as for references, the easiest and most tangible: take a trip to Egypt one day and take a good look at the bas-reliefs there depicting ancient Egyptians (especially the colored bas-reliefs)..but if you cannot travel there, well again just Google them out :)
@salimzwein Well what Dynasty is that from? Look let me simply put it like this! Kemet is BLACK (Certain Dynasties for Asians to a certain point) up until 600-500 BC.
@amaribling there was a period of time roughly stretching for 1000 BC till 650 BC where the Kings of Numidia (nowadays Sudan) conquered southern Egypt and ended up conquering all the land and were indeed black ..they tried as much as they could to cloth and live and build like the Egyptians..but they still were numidians and black and Egyptians used to resent them to the point of racism..sad but true!..but these were not the guys who founded ancient egypt
@salimzwein For every bullshit piece of his-story that has been written about North Africa being non black I can prove it was! Writers of the day tell us what they knew of Black Africa.
@salimzwein there was a period of time roughly stretching for 1000 BC till 650 BC where the Kings of Numidia (nowadays Sudan) conquered southern Egypt and ended up conquering all the land and were indeed black ..they tried as much as they could to cloth and live and build like the Egyptians..but they still were numidians and black and Egyptians used to resent them to the point of racism..sad but true!..but these were not the guys who founded ancient egypt
@salimzwein Wooooow you have sunk to a new low. Yes Kush ruled during those times. Can you really have the balls to say all the acient pharaohs were white? Queen Tyi, Nefertiti, Akhenaton, IMHOTEP(The genius), Zoser, KHUFU(Built the pyramids), NARMER THE FOUNDER OF DYNASTIC KEMET (3200 B.C.) are all BLOODY BLACK. Look at there faces they looking bloody white to you moron???? SENWORSERT I Herodotus said a black king named Sesostris conquered Greece!
@amaribling have you been living on Mars or something?have you taken a good look at the famous bust of Nefertiti in the Neues Museum???or the or at the features of Imhotep Akhenaton?? there is nothing negroid about their feature..but hey you could insist on your blindness..and ah by the way , there not just black and whites in the world , there are brown people who can be subdivided into Mediterraneans, Northern Africans, Semites etc....yes they were dark skinned just as nowadays Egyptians!!
@salimzwein Akhenaton who was his mother? What does she look look you fool? Like I said black people come in different sades! What about the other names I mentioned deny they weren't black
@amaribling have you EVER been to Egypt? have you taken a GOOD look at the population there? you would be struck by the resemblance the bear to the Pharaohs dear ..and yes some of them have deep dark skin ...they are still not black ...same as the srilankans are not black ..by black I mean the African black...but hey I am talking to guy who probably day dreams in his room all day..a good advice go out , see the world..its is an eye opener!
@salimzwein What the hell is brown skin. Mediterraneans are not brown, black people are brown. Mediterraneans are Europeans, North Africa is AFRICA fool.
@amaribling I am from Algeria (North Africa) and I can tell you that north african are more like the rest of the mediterraneans than the rest of the africans.
@Letsppaymoney I am well aware of that and you are 100% right. However, please be informed that wasn't always the case. I gather you have read my previous comments. What you should do is brush up on your history & you will come to know the truth! I have overwhelming evidence to support what I say & written. Mediterraneans came int north Africa via the the Italian occupation in 1911 look it up mate...
@salimzwein Akhenaton! Racist scholars have portrayed him, his wife and son as white. There are loads of artifacts that portray these people as black rather than brown fool look it up
@amaribling the color on the all basreliefs is BROWN (as opposed to the black they used to portray Nubians with)..but hey ..you can see whatever color you like :)
@salimzwein Exacxtly. That's how they separated from the counterparts. I cant believe white people and Arabs claim brown now its too funny! Answer me please what about others I mentioned?
@salimzwein Also if Nefertiti was white, why is her daughter Merytaten a BLACK woman like her grandmother Queen Tiye? I really want to know what you have to say about this? You guys really dont have a bloody clue! Like ive said dont mess with me as I have the knowledge. I refuse to let Arabs & European scholars spared their lies. Every piece of crap you come up with I have an answer! Try harder than 1000BC-650BC. 650BC is when Greeks started to learn from the North African black man!
@salimzwein s Sesostris or Kekrops were the greek names given to SENWORSERT I . Greek mythology also indicated that the legendary founder of Athens was an Egyptian named Kekrops. NOW tell me i am taking shit. You people really think you can contiue to fool the world, well guess what it wont work anymore!
@amaribling Your the guy who doesn't know the difference between Hebrews of the past and Jews of today looooooooool. Now that is bloody funny trust me. You have killed me with laughter thanks mate.....
@glock71 Where is your evidence that this has to be the case. Please prove it! I have more than proved that there is no way on gods green earth he could have been Caucasian! Italians only have a presence in North Africa as they invaded in1850s or so and killed half the indigenous people. During the time of 1850-1939 North Africa had over 50 million migrants from Europe & Middle east settlers. What you see today is not what was there 2000-3000 years ago. Look it up if you dont believe me
@daniel27121993 actually, Hannibal was Carthaginian, descended from the folk of Tyre; they were more Semitic than anything else.Think of them as looking a bit like today's Palestinians.
@ericalbin carthage tunisia..Have you seen the coin housed in the british museum struck during the carthaginian invasion of italy in 217bc? You will clearly see Hannibal was a negro!
@daniel27121993 Carthage (meaning "New City") was a colony founded by the Phoenicians and it outlived its motherland. The Punic population was caucascian (as were the phoenicians) although relatively small in numbers. Hannibal Barca was son of Hamilcar Barca who was supreme commander of Punic armed forces and member of high nobility. Although there were many black people in Punic armies, he himself was descendant of original settlers, same as the rest of Punic nobility.
@glock71 Phoenicians and Canaanites were black. There is more evidence that proves he was black rather than Caucasian. Like I have said a million times, The Phoenicians had a small territory in North Africa. They invaded around 600BC. Hannibal 200BC. So over 400 years one would think the Phoenicians would have mixed with the indigenous people. Nations mixed in order to keep peace with neighbors, So argue what you like the man was black.
Alexander Siddig , the actor who is playing "Hannibal" is actually Sudanese. Born in North Africa. so he wouldve looked like what Hannibal would be, Plus , yes they would be mixed with the darker Africans considering the geography. now if you consider hundreds years later when the Moors invaded Spain..If you would go to Barcelona now, you would see some of their buildings have some moselem influence.
African history is black. Europeans & Arabs only came in 600BC. Before 600BC Africa is black and not Asian, so get that though your thick skull. With the events in Libya Ive had the chance to look into her history. Libya became white little more than 100-150 years ago with the invasion of Italy. They killed half the population which was black!!! Asian & European involvement in Africa is minimal at best. Africa was ancient before 600BC!!
@RealspitHiphop604 Hmm maybe Alexander The great could be match for him, And Scipio Africanus found a way to defeat him. I am not saying they are better, but that in the end he made mistakes, which lead to his defeat.
@MrGegere I respect your view because Alexander was great yes and would be a good match but if Hannibal and Scipio had equal armies it would be just like their first encounters all over again, pure murder. Scipio copied his tactics and Hannibal's troops were vastly untrained when they fought in Africa.
@RealspitHiphop604 Alexander the Great was a great military leader, however after he acquired his name when conquering Kemet his next obstacle was a formidable Army. This army led by "Queen Candace" of Kush was a sight for sore eyes. If he would have fought he could have lost his reputation to a female military tactician general. Alexander reconsidered his decision to go into battle because his opponent’s air of confidence forced him to think about his winning streak....
@Liquidsback No mate you deffo dont know your history. Please check time spans and get back to me. I am very sure you didn't even know his desire to conquer Kush! If he didn't want to challenge both Candace, and Darius at the same time, why did he invade Kemet and other nations before he engaged Darius? Just pitiful really. Is it that hard to believe that the almighty Alexander was scared to face an army led by a black woman?
@amaribling Because there were Greek colonies in Asia minor, which would support him over the Persians. Egypt was rioting at the time and most of Persia's attention was stopping the rebellion. I don't think the Egyptians would have accepted him if he didn't defeat Darius at Issus first.He then came to Egypt for the Nile, a great source of grain and closer to his troops in the middle east than Greece. He couldn't invade Nubia, because Darius still had an army of 250,000 waiting for him.
@Liquidsback And thus he would have opened two fronts, but Alexander was more interested in conquering Persia than Nubia as well. He went to conquer the rest of the Persian Empire, Central Asia, and parts of India. He was planning a campaign to conquer Arabia, then Nubia, Carthage, and The Roman republic but died at 33. Also do think a man who charged head first into the Persian Immortals on his cavalry, head first into Porus' Elephants, and was first over the walls of the Sogdian walls...
@amaribling would be afraid to take on a black woman? This was a man who wanted to be like his ancestor Achilles....he would have compared Candice to Penthesilea. FYI don't tell a man who has a bachelor's in history he doesn't know what he is talking about
Most of you probably don't know Hannibal was black African. In the year this war was fought, Africa was all black. The elephants Hannibal used are African elephants and they are NOT FOUND IN NORTH AFRICA. I THINK IT'S WORTH NOTING THAT AFRICAN HISTORY HAS BEEN RELEGATED INTO THE BACKGROUND AND THE FEW EVIDENCE DISTORTED.
@tamale26Hannibal was from North Africa, an area that was then and still is inhabited by relatively light skinned people, Carthage was originally part of the Phoenician empire and became an empire of it's own. There would no doubt have been people of Semitic, Aegean, North African and black African origin mingling there. Hannibal could have been black African but probably wasn't.
@tamale26 learn some fucking history kid. hannibal was phoenician. pheonicians were a semitic people, like jews and arabs today, and they're not black. africa was all black? the egyptians weren't black, the lybians weren't black. like today north africa was inhabited by light skinned peoples. so please, learn some history before making a total fool of yourself, and for the love of history PLEASE don't preach your bullshit propaganda here, no one wants to hear it!
@kwatemok i honestly dont involve myself with these convos because they are so stressful but if (you) actually learned the history written and spoken not by the modern, post atlantic slave trade group of people and ancient historians one such as herodotus where he refers to the egyptian as being Ethiopian in origin because they were black skinned with wooly hair. if you looked into what some of these so called afro centrics were saying and realise that its not a cry for acceptance and realize
@kwatemok that its more about correcting racism that has been brought about in the many different forms and actually look into what they were saying instead of jumping to the conclusion with your possibly prejudiced mind and assuming that they were saying these things without being informed of anything you would that a lot of what you hear about the egyptian, phoenician, and carthaginians being black in (origin) if anyone with no hate, no prejudice, no concern for races looks, they would see
@kwatemok black power extremist.....lol, no! i do have pride about my existence and just cant stand the negativity i receive from the world just for existing this may be the last i reply but i thought you may have been a person who looks a little deeper into things, instead of just taking in whats on the surface. i saw a reply you gave on the americans going into vietnam. in this situation we just want to get rid of the colonial rulers lies on our continent's history and tell our own story.
@marauda777 first of all, the world isn`t america. we don`t care about skin color in europe. racism? we don't even perceive racism like you do over there, we don't make such a great deal out of it over here. why? cuz we're all humans and skin color is irrelevant. i was just saying that hannibal was a phoenician, a semite, and semites aren't black. they originate from the middle east which wasn't and isn't today inhabited by black people (which live(d) in subsaharian africa).
@kwatemok lol dont care about skin color in europe....what i was asking you to do before was to actually look into what black people are saying once you do that instead of just reading that hannibal was black when you may have been taught otherwise, you may be surprised most of what is said about egyptian and other cultures being black in origin does not come from black peoples imagination, its not (out of the thin air) spken by peoples of the past prior to the atlantic slave is where it is from
@kwatemok Herodotus is one, he spoke of the egyptian and pheonicians as being egyptian in origin because of their black skin and wooly hair, not only that, but also because of the many shared practices of the 2, he explained the pheonicians were the remanence of the army of sesostris who had conquered much of the mesopotamia. i dont neccessarily blame people for being ignorant towards us but it is that ignorance that causing people to assume that we are dreaming
@kwatemok If you read my earlier comments I demonstrate logic that Hannibal would have been a black man! People talk of Phoenicians like there were millions in North Africa at the time which is not true. The Phoenicians had a small territory in North Africa. They invaded around 600BC. Hannibal 200BC. So over 400 years one would think the Phoenicians would have mixed with the indigenous people. Nations mixed in order to keep peace with neighbors, So argue what you like the man was black
@kwatemok You fool Jews are not a people. You might as well say Muslims are a people or race. Peoples of north Africa today are there though the invasion of Islam in 600-700BC and mostly though the Italians killing most of the blacks during 1800-1900AD. Libya for example was most black. The people there now are of Italian origin and other European heritage. Gaddafi knew it and shown the world! People talk so much shit on here and dont have a clue what they even on about too funny..
@amaribling you are obviously retarded. learn to tell the difference from jews and followers of judaism. you are mistaking the people for their religion.
@kwatemok No you the retard one! Jews are not a people. Khazarians have fooled you with all that shit. Do you know who the "khazarians" are? Is that all you have to say? You know not to run your mouth about Hannibal! I have more than demonstrated he could never have been a white or an Arab man. Phoenicians, canaanite's, Israelite's ect all had black people. Their is more than enough evidence to back this up. If Jews are a people, lets keep it real the Falasha Jew goes back to Salomon!
@amaribling obviously you don't know shit about history, where i on the other hand am a historian for a living. i have no time nor the patience for your stupid conspiracy theories which have no real evidence behind them.
@kwatemok Lets go toe to toe. I have blown out so many of you stupid internationalised academics who have learned history from racist pre 20th century text books that was written by racist European, Khazarians and Arabs scholars who have re written history in order to stop the black man who was in bondage from knowing his history! You want to go their about evidence! Lets do this NOW! Lets start with Kemet. The ancient Kemet people were they black? Hannibal & Moors were they black??
@kwatemok What you do for a living is a waste of time as you dont know SHIT!!! North Africans have they always looked the way they did? Were they always Arabs & Europeans? Sub-saharan africa I believe you "Historians" call it, 700AD-1600AD what was going on there? Were they running around naked? What was Europe going though then? You are a professor of bullshit! You picked the wrong person to go here with. I bet you will hit me with Beber shit. Primary sources dont lie & I know them
@amaribling and you imply the jews didn't form a nation nor a people, ancient egyptians and middle eastern peoples were black. you're just a clown, and no one takes you seriously. so please, stop embarrassing yourself. anyone can say anything, but you need evidence to support your wild theories. but i appreciate your effort to prove your point. you made me laugh.
ps - you're not even a licensed historian, no one will listen to you except other frustrated kids like yourself.
@amaribling What was going on in Europe then, The Eastern Roman Empire, The Vikings, The Carolingians, The Normans, The Holy Roman Empire, Inquistion, The reconquista, the hundred years war, The Crusades, the Teutonic Wars, The Mongol Invasions, The Magyar Invasions, not a whole lot. About the same as Africa with the Ghana, Mali, and Songhai Empires, yep not a whole lot.
@Liquidsback I will inform you, the Moors of al-andalus gave to Europeans light during their dark ages. What you need to know is that in those time blacks were Europeans too. They were in high regard and noble stature. What you have meant is nothing of much merit only that those era's brought war. Ghana, Mali, and Songhai Empires brought art and craftsmanship. They were even folding steel. What about the "black plague"! Timbuktu population 100,000 plus-London 20,000 is shit n piss
@Liquidsback Oh yeah I forgot what did the people of Constantinople look like? Well they wasnt more Caucasian looking people than black African looking people. Why dont they show what most of the kings and queens of Constantinople looked liked? The reason is they were mostly African looking people! Look at the pictures of the Madonna, they depicted her as a black woman and Christ as a black infant!
@amaribling You dumb fuck Constantinople was the the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire, the Byzantine stain glasses show Emperor Justinian as a Greco Roman Man. You've lost accept it, because clearly you just don't know what your talking about. You've brought up Candice but she is no more than legend when dealing with Alexander the Great. He historically went no further south in Africa than the Siwa Oasis. You said Constantinople was run by black men when it was clearly Byzantium founded by..
@Liquidsback Greeks and rebuilt by the Roman Emperor CONSTANTINE, I never claimed that The kingdom of Kush, The Kingdom of Axum, The Empire of Ghana, The Empire of Mali, The Empire of Ethiopia, The Nok Civilization, Great Zimbabwe, The Zulu Kingdom, The Songhai Empire, and many other African cultures were founded or run by Arabs and White men. You do not see the oppressed Celtic peoples claiming that other Europeans stole their history, by saying the Roman, Egyptians and etc were Celtic Men.
@Liquidsback And you know something else I'll admit as a European, The kingdom of Jerusalem and the Kingdom of Makuria were Christian allies against the Ayyubid Sultanate of Saladin.
@Liquidsback Ancient Egyptians were black admit that! You dont want to admit that the peoples of Ancient North Africa were black too! The influx of Arabs & Europeans wasn't till 600BC-700AD FACT! The Civilization's you have mention are often referred to as Sub- Sahara. I deem that racist as it filters out to mean nothing of any interest and not Civilized by European scholars!
@amaribling Fact I never said Egyptians were European, also if Egypt was African the fact is Greek writing and gods are closer to that of Mesopotamia.
@Liquidsback Well said that's true. Now you have tripped your self up. The greeks started a school of philosophy which was found by Aristippus a pupil of Socrates. This was were they learned from the peoples. If they didnt learn from the people why set up the school there? They also made pilgrimages to kemet which was made famous by Pythagoras. No am I lieing, The Egyptians knew The Pythagorean Theorem for over a thousand years before Pythagoras did?
@amaribling Yeah, I'll agree with that now were starting to somewhat agree. Except for the Napoleon thing, could the Sphinx have been destroyed by Napoleon.... possible again another legend. But he is not the only one that is credited to destroying the Spinx' nose.
@Liquidsback I never said that all the kings & Queens were black! The Byzantine stain glasses show Emperors that were black too mention that! Its clear you have only become aware of Queen Candice and I assure you its not myth or legend. Her account with Alexander is well documented, only the affair they had is legend! If you want sources holla back at me! Lucius Septimius Bassianus & Marcus Opellius Macrinus just to name a few looool
@amaribling They're plenty of stain glasses depicting Basil the Bulgar Slayer, Emperor Komenios, Emperor Constantine, did they look Nordic? No they looked Greek.
@Liquidsback Now you wanna talk about greeks looool. What do Plato, Socrates, Pythagoras even Aristotle all have in common? They all went to Kemet to get their education or Finnish it! The foundations of what these men came to learn and teach they learn in BLACK KEMET!!! Whats even more funny if it wasn't for BLACK MOORS you wouldn't even know who these men were looool
@amaribling You want to know something funny they never did no evidence shows, Herodotus probably did. But Aristotle died in Greece never left, also The Romans spread these philosophers to western Europe before the Moors even rose to power. Your just trolling because you lost you Sniveling Ass you can't even spell Finish write.
@Liquidsback Pettiness Now! You sound like Mary Lefkowitz "Not Out of Africa: How Afrocentrism Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History" Well like Dr Clake I will blow you out. He didn't go with Alexander however he did go in his youth! Can you say the same for the others I mentioned? Why is it yu dont answer me questions but I answer yours? Please read my questions and answer them if you can?
@amaribling You attack Dr. Lefkowitz who attacked that. The historical basis on books like that aren't really based on evidence. You keep attacking Europeans, and Arabs like it is some conspiracy. When I contradicted you on Europe in the middle ages, you switched to Candice of Kush. When I contradicted you on her meeting Alexander as just a legend, you switched to Constantinople being founded by Blacks, when I contradicted you on that you switched to Greeks stealing from Egypt.
@Liquidsback You have this twisted. You dont like to answer me. When you dont answer I bring up more for you to disagree with which you do! Contradicted you say? Candice of Kush is more than a legend, you just googled it hence the keyword legend. Conspiracy is the key word again as why would history be re written if it wasn't? Nev er said Greeks stole, I said they learned so get your facts straight!
@Liquidsback Pardon me if you interpreted that. I never said they met. However they engaged each others armies. Alexander withdrew for his reason which I am not wholly sure of. It is more than fair to say he underestimated the kushites therefore had hast to avoid a battle. Never did I say they had a romance! We know of their encounter via black historians such as Chancellor Williams & Dr Cheikh Anta Diop.
@amaribling The Alexander romance doesn't just mean love, it's basically legends and myths. Like one is he adventured in a submarine, another one is the Gordian knot. As for them not fighting it's opening two fronts, like Hitler did with Britain and the Soviet Union.
@Liquidsback Look give it up. Im not gonna buy your irrational, personal and misconception in this matter. Like I said my sources are Chancellor Williams & Dr Cheikh Anta Diop. Two of the greatest historians of the modern era. The encounter was not a myth. The romance yes, who knows!!!!
@Liquidsback I have done. If I was to rely on the net I wouldnt get any where. I have looked at the sources Chancellor Williams was able to study. Chancellor Williams makes out in his language and use's the word legend. However in his later work he provides evidence that they never meet but there armies weren't far from each other and ready for combat? You seem like you have great knowledge, however you talk like there isn't a conspiracy to deny blacks in history?
@amaribling There's a conspiracy all right, however blacks weren't everywhere in history, just as there were not whites everywhere in history. You just keep citing stuff that has been refuted, and contradicted. I'm not trying to offend you or deny black people there history.
@Liquidsback Never said blacks were every where! Looks Africans went to the Americas before Columbus as did Al Idrisi! It goes on & on. I am just highlighting what I know of and there is so much more. However I have come off the subject that first caught my attention Hannibal! All the people on here talk about Phoenicians looking like the people in that area of the world today. The people of today weren't the same people that were there back then fact!
@Liquidsback Im cool with that. If you do some research you will find that up until the 1920s it was well known amongst scholars that Africa was the cradle of civilization and black people played a major role in the emergence of Europe. You see that's the time black Americans & west Indians started to question and re gain the knowledge of our 4 fathers. Africans 2day have to remain in the dark about there past as the west & China would loose the influence & control of the resources
@Liquidsback I could never lose as history doesn't lie! I can prove all that I say. North Africa was never White nor Arab in Ancient times so get that though your thick skull and smoke it!! If you really want me to expose all the lies of Europeans & Arabs let me know as its my pleasure. You want me to let you know that Roman culture was heavily influenced by traditional African villages & Empires!!! If I was you I would get my pre 20th cen books of shit ready to challenge me loool
@amaribling Oh I never said the Numidians, Moors, and Berbers weren't European or Arab.I've read ancient literature I've read the christian Beowulf, I know Koine Greek, I could read a 3rd century bible as well as you could read this now, do you understand? You see I don't give a shit whether Hannibal, Ramses, or Jesus were Black, Arab, or White but you can't just accept that if they weren't black if you went back and time saw if Hannibal was a blonde and very pale you would cover it up.
@Liquidsback Julius Ceasar had a mulatto child with an African queen...
"Caesarion (note the different spelling) was a son born of Caesar and Cleopatra. He was killed by Caesar's adopted son Octavian (actually a nephew), when he was 17. "
Rome printed disfigured coins as propaganda/racial slur against her influence over him. And then they murdered the entire interracial family...You don't see many references to ancient racism, but it was intense.
@lusulpher Cleopatra was a descendant of Ptolemy, The Macedonian Greek General who took Egypt after his death. She was also not very pretty look at the coins of her because the Ptolemaic Dynasty like all Pharaohs would inbreed with each other to emulate Osiris, and Isis.
@lusulpher Caesar didn't love Cleopatra, he needed money and grain for his troops and he was pissed after Ptolemy killed Pompey. Augustus also needed Cesarion dead because another heir of Caesar was a threat to his title, and could also start another civil war.
@Liquidsback Alexander The Great is clearly a mulatto with "Greek"[Arab + albino] physical features, but that is only if you pay attention to the stoneware and mosaics made of his actual skin tone...and not the textbooks that portray all great African/Phoenician/Egyptian/offshoot colonies as being French.
@lusulpher Funny because Plutarch described him as pale, brownish blonde hair and one blue eye, and the other brown. Plutarch got his source from Ptolemy his general.
@Liquidsback Find the oldest depiction of Hannibal and tell me that is not an African, and then find one from a few hundred years ago...I call it the Tiger Wood's Effect. The more successful they become, the less African.
Or did you never wonder why Rome refused to capitulate to a fellow European? !Hannibal ante portis! the grieving mothers cried, for SIXTEEN YEARS...
@Liquidsback If that's so surely you know that Hannibal, Ramses, or Jesus were Black. I have taken it that when people say they dont care they really do! If I was you watch Dr Clake in a debate with Mary Lefkowitz and know how racist scholars have changed history.
@Liquidsback Napoleon went around Egypt cannoning the "African noses" off of the statues and monuments. He felt Africans could not have mastered science before Europe had even been colonized, so he took time to censor history as much as he could. Museums today are restoring "European noses" to ancient burial jars...
You will be hard-pressed for "truth" when the scholars are also racist.
@lusulpher The Napoleon thing is a legend, also it is attributed to Muhammad Sa'im al-Dahr because Egyptian peasants were making offers to the sphinx.
@Liquidsback Stop chatting shit. Napoleon did disfigure ancient artifacts as he was pissed that black people could have created such marvels. Thats another lie white & Arab scholars have come up with to spin people. You really are a spinner aren't you.
@Liquidsback The problem here is that Arabs and Europeans keep trying to hijack "Black Ancient History" and interpret as there own! This has only been the case between the last 100-500years since the black man has been freed from bondage & gained knowledge of Africa and its presence worldwide. Since the time of Plato, Socrates, Pythagoras ect it was accepted that Africa was the birthplace of Knowledge & civilization. The European renaissance and reformation changed history!!!!
@kwatemok Glad you removed you pitiful response. You say your are an archaeologist! If this be the case how on gods green earth could you not believe Ancient North Africa was mostly black? I have asked you questions which you can't answer! Conspiracy theories you say, however I had demonstrated what I have said with evidence. Look Indiana Jones, Let me ask you this, Sub-Saharan Africa is this a racist term which suggest non civilized? Was Ancient Kemet 10,000-700BC Black orientated
@kwatemok Your response I deem racist hence why you removed it. You called me "frustrated, you're probably a factory worker or something, breaking your back for minimum wage and feeling unachieved (Spell check needed!)". You wasting your time in the pursuit of academic lies. I have gained knowledge off my own merit! While scholars of the last 100years bullshit, scholars of the day reem the benevolence of the black man in Africa! I bet you believe Ramesses II had purple hair lool
@amaribling i didn't remove it. it's there. ramessess had red hair, not purple, but LIKE I SAID - YOU ARE NOT A LICENSED HISTORIAN! i can pretend to be a doctor and argue with surgeons telling them they aint doin their job right, but i`m not. now ask yourself why.
@kwatemok You are a first class fool. Historian in your prospective is "His-Story" nothing but lies. Why dont you back up your disagreements with what I have said. Not once have you manged to do this. So Ramesses II was he a Greek, Roman, Arab or maybe an Hittite? Was he a black man? Answer me what I have been asking numerous of times, the ancient Kemet people were they black? Hannibal & Moors were they black? The people who built the sphinx were they black? Did Jewish slaves build it?
EVERY FUCKING TIME I SEE A VIDEO ABOUT HANNIBAL SOME FUCKING RACIST NO LIFERS ARGUE IN THE COMMENTS,EVERY TIME!!!!!WOULD YOU PLEASE ALL GO FUCK YOURSELF!!!???
@Rubix0517 Is the English accent a problem? The romans spoke Latin, which was considered as the official spokeslanguage in the known world. Today, English is considered as the official worldlanguage, though there are many different types of English. Yet the original English is British English, and therefor the type that fits this show the best :)
How can can such a primitive language like latin be official in the so called known, was it official in China, was it official in Africa, was it official across Asia or even Europe.
is that voice-over Pompeii Magnus from the HBO series 'Rome'?
TopGunJAB 2 days ago
The Egyptians were not black but a multi-ethnic society with most of them having their roots from the middle east. It was NOT a black empire no matter what you might think and Carthaginians were Phoenicians not Africans, so they were not a majority of blacks either. The ancients didn't even have a notion of race but of citizenship, so most citizens in Rome, Greece, and Eygpt were mixed and were not pure anything. Stop bending history because you want to prove that blacks invented civilization.
Xadryn18 5 days ago
@Xadryn18 So are we meant to take your word for this you fool! Give me evidence to back up your words? I guarantee you dont have any! Who told you that Phoenicians or Carthaginians weren't black? If I was you I would read what the writers of the day wrote about how these people looked? Egypt being mixed is correct but only to a certain point! Prove black people didn't have a major role in the foundations of civilization? I dont think you have any idea what you are talking about....
amaribling 4 days ago
Why are all bio-pics about Africa presented with white or smelly Arabs/Persians as the ones, didn't you here of how Alexander the Great destroyed the Sphinx's nose because the nose was a black man's nose.
Those people in the Middle East there history has been giftwrapped and bestowed upon them by angry know good Willie Lynch, before that Socrates got his ideas and philosophy from Africa, and Asia it's all real. It's just like in the bible all stories are of whites, but are in Africa---CRAZY
maxluvaluva1 1 week ago
@maxluvaluva Where are you from ?
in the Middle East is the cradle of civilizations , We are proud we are Arabs and Muslims, my grandparents Developed Europe .it is not Alexander the Great destroyed the Sphinx's nose it was Napoleon but you did not Read history :)
hanybal007 1 day ago
@hanybal007 Eurpoean shcolars make out it was an iconoclasm Arab named Muhammad Sa'im al-Dahr. A Sufi Muslim fanatic from the khanqah of Sa'id al-Su'ada! In 1378 CE. They even went as far to say an Egyptian Arab historian named al-Maqrīzī, wrote about it in the 15th century CE! Now here is where it gets good. Between that time to Napoleon many artist have drawn the Sphinx i.e Louis Francois Cassas in 1790 CE.
amaribling 14 hours ago
@hanybal007 I also will correct you sir. It wasn't Arabs who solely Developed Europe! It was the Moors with a hint of Arab influence! They occupation in Al-Andalus only came to an end because Black Moors & Arabs couldn't get along. City by City the whites Spanish took overall control. At this point the white Spanish need the moors, Jews & Arabs to educate them. Once this happened they were all kicked out
amaribling 14 hours ago
Isn't hannibal the doc from deep space nine =0!!!!
crackshack2 1 week ago
I think that Carthagians were of dark skin is it true not white as it is shown.
Fguramafia 2 weeks ago
@Fguramafia Hannibal would have been greek looking, but most of his country's own soldiers would have been a greek-african mix.
thefattestape 1 week ago
@thefattestape How do you know this. Whats your evidence? You made a statement please inform your sources?
amaribling 1 week ago
@amaribling keeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeno
lLiiam 1 week ago
I wish they would be correct with the geography of the time...
frostythesn0wman 2 weeks ago
HA! major flaw in this video at 8:56 hannibal when discussing tactics calls France france, instead of gaul which it was known as at the time!!
Evenson71 2 weeks ago
@Evenson71 Or Hannibal was a prophet AAAUUUUHHH
Liquidsback 2 weeks ago
@Evenson71 I caught that too - had to roll back the video just to double check. France and Spain? I think not! Gaul and Hispania is what they were called then. That's such a fundamental miss I couldn't believe it.
andersmful 2 weeks ago
wait wot the fuck, hannibal never had elephants reach any battles against Rome, they died in the alps
necrontyr1800 2 weeks ago
@necrontyr1800 There were some at Trebia.
Liquidsback 2 weeks ago
@Liquidsback yea but died quickly, and had no real role in trebia since the freezing water did the work
necrontyr1800 2 weeks ago
It is when Rome is in true danger that it is most to be feared.
KiNPiN1835 2 weeks ago
Hannibal was from a prominent politically involved family in Carthage.such families were strictly from Tyrio-Phoenician origins (actual Lebanon) and were by no means African.at best they could have been pale to brownish skin with curly hair and dark or colored eyes (What you call a Mediterranean type nowadays) for more accurate portrait just take a look at the Lebanese of today (the Syrians, the Palestinians and the Hebrews my also give you a good indicator of how he would have looked like)
salimzwein 3 weeks ago
@salimzwein Why do you people keep talking like the people who occupy these areas today were the people who occupied those areas then? Ancient Hebrews were BLACK!! If you dont know how white jews came about then you have no business even voice anything here!!!
amaribling 2 weeks ago
@amaribling if it makes you sleep at night..but the fact is: the actual Jews priest families can trace their genealogy back to King Saul ..and they are not black..the other proof is the Assyrian bas-relief representing Jehu kneeling at the feet of the the Assyrians king or the Hebrews being deported or the siege of Jerusalem they all represent the Hebrews as being people with Mediterranean features , and the Assyrians were maniacs when it comes to details. add to that the bible references..
salimzwein 2 weeks ago
@salimzwein Please. Educated people know how white Europeans came to become JEWS!!! Im not even gonna waste my time with that CRAP!!!! I refuse to be spun with lies. Hebrews, Canaanites and Phoenicians were black & Asian people.Canaanites were more black. Jerusalem only became white when Britian & USA fucked the Palestinians and let the Khazarians commit Genocide and concentration camps. Ironic concentration camps being the key word....
amaribling 2 weeks ago
@amaribling is that the best you could do? please Google Egyptian and Assyrian bas relief showing Canaanites and Hebrews. you will find, to your great dismay, that they were fair to brown skinned (typically Mediterranean) not black nor negroid. some even are portrayed to have blue eyes although it was a rarity yet even the scriptures talk about that rare eye color occurrence..but none was black..sorry bro you have to live with that
salimzwein 2 weeks ago
@salimzwein Dickhead. Keyword Google! What a fool you are to come on here and talk to me about google when I speak of written accounts of people from the day events took place. Witness accounts, herodotus, diodorus siculus even phogagous? These men have been discredited by morden scholars to fool people and keep the myth the white man has always been on top. Go away and dont talk to me again, man without knowledge....
amaribling 1 week ago
@amaribling I love it :) when you lose your argument you start using dirty words..that just killed me (from laughter)..honey if I asked you to Google it is because obviously you are totally unable to read (or find) a true research book worth of that name..as for the accounts you are citing you should hold them with nuance: Romans used to treat all non Romans as barbarians, and any skin color darker than their as dark skin..add to that the bias of years of transcriptions in European courts
salimzwein 1 week ago
@salimzwein How dear you talk of romans! If it wasnt for the black moors and Black & white jews of Al-Andalus you wouldn't know shit FACT! Romans respected civilizations that were ancient to theirs. Barbarians? Why are you talking about barbarians? Look you have read what ive been talking about on here for months I assume? Well if you think that North Africa has always been white please provide sources to back this? Glad you found humor as I try my best.....
amaribling 1 week ago
@amaribling I believe in freedom of speech so I dare speak of anything, I beg you pardon. as for references, the easiest and most tangible: take a trip to Egypt one day and take a good look at the bas-reliefs there depicting ancient Egyptians (especially the colored bas-reliefs)..but if you cannot travel there, well again just Google them out :)
salimzwein 1 week ago
@salimzwein Well what Dynasty is that from? Look let me simply put it like this! Kemet is BLACK (Certain Dynasties for Asians to a certain point) up until 600-500 BC.
amaribling 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@amaribling there was a period of time roughly stretching for 1000 BC till 650 BC where the Kings of Numidia (nowadays Sudan) conquered southern Egypt and ended up conquering all the land and were indeed black ..they tried as much as they could to cloth and live and build like the Egyptians..but they still were numidians and black and Egyptians used to resent them to the point of racism..sad but true!..but these were not the guys who founded ancient egypt
salimzwein 1 week ago
@salimzwein For every bullshit piece of his-story that has been written about North Africa being non black I can prove it was! Writers of the day tell us what they knew of Black Africa.
amaribling 1 week ago
@salimzwein there was a period of time roughly stretching for 1000 BC till 650 BC where the Kings of Numidia (nowadays Sudan) conquered southern Egypt and ended up conquering all the land and were indeed black ..they tried as much as they could to cloth and live and build like the Egyptians..but they still were numidians and black and Egyptians used to resent them to the point of racism..sad but true!..but these were not the guys who founded ancient egypt
salimzwein 1 week ago
@salimzwein Wooooow you have sunk to a new low. Yes Kush ruled during those times. Can you really have the balls to say all the acient pharaohs were white? Queen Tyi, Nefertiti, Akhenaton, IMHOTEP(The genius), Zoser, KHUFU(Built the pyramids), NARMER THE FOUNDER OF DYNASTIC KEMET (3200 B.C.) are all BLOODY BLACK. Look at there faces they looking bloody white to you moron???? SENWORSERT I Herodotus said a black king named Sesostris conquered Greece!
amaribling 1 week ago
@amaribling have you been living on Mars or something?have you taken a good look at the famous bust of Nefertiti in the Neues Museum???or the or at the features of Imhotep Akhenaton?? there is nothing negroid about their feature..but hey you could insist on your blindness..and ah by the way , there not just black and whites in the world , there are brown people who can be subdivided into Mediterraneans, Northern Africans, Semites etc....yes they were dark skinned just as nowadays Egyptians!!
salimzwein 1 week ago
@salimzwein Akhenaton who was his mother? What does she look look you fool? Like I said black people come in different sades! What about the other names I mentioned deny they weren't black
amaribling 1 week ago
@amaribling have you EVER been to Egypt? have you taken a GOOD look at the population there? you would be struck by the resemblance the bear to the Pharaohs dear ..and yes some of them have deep dark skin ...they are still not black ...same as the srilankans are not black ..by black I mean the African black...but hey I am talking to guy who probably day dreams in his room all day..a good advice go out , see the world..its is an eye opener!
salimzwein 1 week ago
@salimzwein What the hell is brown skin. Mediterraneans are not brown, black people are brown. Mediterraneans are Europeans, North Africa is AFRICA fool.
amaribling 1 week ago
@amaribling I am from Algeria (North Africa) and I can tell you that north african are more like the rest of the mediterraneans than the rest of the africans.
Letsppaymoney 5 days ago
@Letsppaymoney I am well aware of that and you are 100% right. However, please be informed that wasn't always the case. I gather you have read my previous comments. What you should do is brush up on your history & you will come to know the truth! I have overwhelming evidence to support what I say & written. Mediterraneans came int north Africa via the the Italian occupation in 1911 look it up mate...
amaribling 4 days ago
@salimzwein Akhenaton! Racist scholars have portrayed him, his wife and son as white. There are loads of artifacts that portray these people as black rather than brown fool look it up
amaribling 1 week ago
@amaribling the color on the all basreliefs is BROWN (as opposed to the black they used to portray Nubians with)..but hey ..you can see whatever color you like :)
salimzwein 1 week ago
@salimzwein Exacxtly. That's how they separated from the counterparts. I cant believe white people and Arabs claim brown now its too funny! Answer me please what about others I mentioned?
amaribling 1 week ago
@salimzwein Also if Nefertiti was white, why is her daughter Merytaten a BLACK woman like her grandmother Queen Tiye? I really want to know what you have to say about this? You guys really dont have a bloody clue! Like ive said dont mess with me as I have the knowledge. I refuse to let Arabs & European scholars spared their lies. Every piece of crap you come up with I have an answer! Try harder than 1000BC-650BC. 650BC is when Greeks started to learn from the North African black man!
amaribling 1 week ago
@salimzwein s Sesostris or Kekrops were the greek names given to SENWORSERT I . Greek mythology also indicated that the legendary founder of Athens was an Egyptian named Kekrops. NOW tell me i am taking shit. You people really think you can contiue to fool the world, well guess what it wont work anymore!
amaribling 1 week ago
@amaribling Your the guy who doesn't know the difference between Hebrews of the past and Jews of today looooooooool. Now that is bloody funny trust me. You have killed me with laughter thanks mate.....
amaribling 1 week ago
all those civilisation are arabs pharaons carthage babylon after coming islam to this people
arabmafiaify 3 weeks ago
I have nothing against black people, but he was caucascian (no doubt dark though, like spaniards, arabs and italians)
glock71 1 month ago
@glock71 Where is your evidence that this has to be the case. Please prove it! I have more than proved that there is no way on gods green earth he could have been Caucasian! Italians only have a presence in North Africa as they invaded in1850s or so and killed half the indigenous people. During the time of 1850-1939 North Africa had over 50 million migrants from Europe & Middle east settlers. What you see today is not what was there 2000-3000 years ago. Look it up if you dont believe me
amaribling 3 weeks ago
hannible was black ,wtf is this shit
daniel27121993 1 month ago
@daniel27121993 actually, Hannibal was Carthaginian, descended from the folk of Tyre; they were more Semitic than anything else.Think of them as looking a bit like today's Palestinians.
ericalbin 1 month ago
@ericalbin Where you get that from? He would have looked like a black man actually! You bring your evidence and I will bring mines....
amaribling 1 month ago
@ericalbin carthage tunisia..Have you seen the coin housed in the british museum struck during the carthaginian invasion of italy in 217bc? You will clearly see Hannibal was a negro!
daniel27121993 1 month ago
@daniel27121993 Carthage (meaning "New City") was a colony founded by the Phoenicians and it outlived its motherland. The Punic population was caucascian (as were the phoenicians) although relatively small in numbers. Hannibal Barca was son of Hamilcar Barca who was supreme commander of Punic armed forces and member of high nobility. Although there were many black people in Punic armies, he himself was descendant of original settlers, same as the rest of Punic nobility.
glock71 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@glock71 Phoenicians and Canaanites were black. There is more evidence that proves he was black rather than Caucasian. Like I have said a million times, The Phoenicians had a small territory in North Africa. They invaded around 600BC. Hannibal 200BC. So over 400 years one would think the Phoenicians would have mixed with the indigenous people. Nations mixed in order to keep peace with neighbors, So argue what you like the man was black.
amaribling 3 weeks ago
@daniel27121993 Nope
lyugiang 3 weeks ago
Did that guy name his testicles peace and war?
typicalviewer2 1 month ago
Alexander Siddig , the actor who is playing "Hannibal" is actually Sudanese. Born in North Africa. so he wouldve looked like what Hannibal would be, Plus , yes they would be mixed with the darker Africans considering the geography. now if you consider hundreds years later when the Moors invaded Spain..If you would go to Barcelona now, you would see some of their buildings have some moselem influence.
Bladestar7 1 month ago
Comment removed
kwatemok 1 month ago in playlist al exander and hanibal
This has been flagged as spam show
African history is black. Europeans & Arabs only came in 600BC. Before 600BC Africa is black and not Asian, so get that though your thick skull. With the events in Libya Ive had the chance to look into her history. Libya became white little more than 100-150 years ago with the invasion of Italy. They killed half the population which was black!!! Asian & European involvement in Africa is minimal at best. Africa was ancient before 600BC!!
amaribling 1 month ago
Wasn't Spain called then Iberia? Somehow it has stayed that way in my mind.
MrGegere 1 month ago
hannibal was the best military leader ever
RealspitHiphop604 1 month ago
@RealspitHiphop604 Hmm maybe Alexander The great could be match for him, And Scipio Africanus found a way to defeat him. I am not saying they are better, but that in the end he made mistakes, which lead to his defeat.
MrGegere 1 month ago
@MrGegere I respect your view because Alexander was great yes and would be a good match but if Hannibal and Scipio had equal armies it would be just like their first encounters all over again, pure murder. Scipio copied his tactics and Hannibal's troops were vastly untrained when they fought in Africa.
RealspitHiphop604 1 month ago
@RealspitHiphop604 Alexander the Great was a great military leader, however after he acquired his name when conquering Kemet his next obstacle was a formidable Army. This army led by "Queen Candace" of Kush was a sight for sore eyes. If he would have fought he could have lost his reputation to a female military tactician general. Alexander reconsidered his decision to go into battle because his opponent’s air of confidence forced him to think about his winning streak....
amaribling 1 month ago
@amaribling Or perhaps because he didn't want to challenge both Candace, and Darius at the same time.
Liquidsback 4 weeks ago
@Liquidsback No mate you deffo dont know your history. Please check time spans and get back to me. I am very sure you didn't even know his desire to conquer Kush! If he didn't want to challenge both Candace, and Darius at the same time, why did he invade Kemet and other nations before he engaged Darius? Just pitiful really. Is it that hard to believe that the almighty Alexander was scared to face an army led by a black woman?
amaribling 3 weeks ago
@amaribling Because there were Greek colonies in Asia minor, which would support him over the Persians. Egypt was rioting at the time and most of Persia's attention was stopping the rebellion. I don't think the Egyptians would have accepted him if he didn't defeat Darius at Issus first.He then came to Egypt for the Nile, a great source of grain and closer to his troops in the middle east than Greece. He couldn't invade Nubia, because Darius still had an army of 250,000 waiting for him.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback And thus he would have opened two fronts, but Alexander was more interested in conquering Persia than Nubia as well. He went to conquer the rest of the Persian Empire, Central Asia, and parts of India. He was planning a campaign to conquer Arabia, then Nubia, Carthage, and The Roman republic but died at 33. Also do think a man who charged head first into the Persian Immortals on his cavalry, head first into Porus' Elephants, and was first over the walls of the Sogdian walls...
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@amaribling would be afraid to take on a black woman? This was a man who wanted to be like his ancestor Achilles....he would have compared Candice to Penthesilea. FYI don't tell a man who has a bachelor's in history he doesn't know what he is talking about
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
Wtf, is everybody racist on here, I'm just trying to watch this & all I can see is racist ass comments, stfu please
Juangotti20 1 month ago
Hannibal wasn't Black,stfu already!
ITSAFUCKINGCROCODILE 1 month ago 3
Most of you probably don't know Hannibal was black African. In the year this war was fought, Africa was all black. The elephants Hannibal used are African elephants and they are NOT FOUND IN NORTH AFRICA. I THINK IT'S WORTH NOTING THAT AFRICAN HISTORY HAS BEEN RELEGATED INTO THE BACKGROUND AND THE FEW EVIDENCE DISTORTED.
tamale26 1 month ago
@tamale26Hannibal was from North Africa, an area that was then and still is inhabited by relatively light skinned people, Carthage was originally part of the Phoenician empire and became an empire of it's own. There would no doubt have been people of Semitic, Aegean, North African and black African origin mingling there. Hannibal could have been black African but probably wasn't.
urlocaldumbguys 1 month ago
@tamale26 learn some fucking history kid. hannibal was phoenician. pheonicians were a semitic people, like jews and arabs today, and they're not black. africa was all black? the egyptians weren't black, the lybians weren't black. like today north africa was inhabited by light skinned peoples. so please, learn some history before making a total fool of yourself, and for the love of history PLEASE don't preach your bullshit propaganda here, no one wants to hear it!
kwatemok 1 month ago in playlist al exander and hanibal
@kwatemok i honestly dont involve myself with these convos because they are so stressful but if (you) actually learned the history written and spoken not by the modern, post atlantic slave trade group of people and ancient historians one such as herodotus where he refers to the egyptian as being Ethiopian in origin because they were black skinned with wooly hair. if you looked into what some of these so called afro centrics were saying and realise that its not a cry for acceptance and realize
marauda777 1 month ago
@kwatemok that its more about correcting racism that has been brought about in the many different forms and actually look into what they were saying instead of jumping to the conclusion with your possibly prejudiced mind and assuming that they were saying these things without being informed of anything you would that a lot of what you hear about the egyptian, phoenician, and carthaginians being black in (origin) if anyone with no hate, no prejudice, no concern for races looks, they would see
marauda777 1 month ago
@marauda777 typical black power extremists propaganda
kwatemok 1 month ago
@kwatemok black power extremist.....lol, no! i do have pride about my existence and just cant stand the negativity i receive from the world just for existing this may be the last i reply but i thought you may have been a person who looks a little deeper into things, instead of just taking in whats on the surface. i saw a reply you gave on the americans going into vietnam. in this situation we just want to get rid of the colonial rulers lies on our continent's history and tell our own story.
marauda777 1 month ago
@marauda777 first of all, the world isn`t america. we don`t care about skin color in europe. racism? we don't even perceive racism like you do over there, we don't make such a great deal out of it over here. why? cuz we're all humans and skin color is irrelevant. i was just saying that hannibal was a phoenician, a semite, and semites aren't black. they originate from the middle east which wasn't and isn't today inhabited by black people (which live(d) in subsaharian africa).
kwatemok 1 month ago
@kwatemok lol dont care about skin color in europe....what i was asking you to do before was to actually look into what black people are saying once you do that instead of just reading that hannibal was black when you may have been taught otherwise, you may be surprised most of what is said about egyptian and other cultures being black in origin does not come from black peoples imagination, its not (out of the thin air) spken by peoples of the past prior to the atlantic slave is where it is from
marauda777 1 month ago
@kwatemok Herodotus is one, he spoke of the egyptian and pheonicians as being egyptian in origin because of their black skin and wooly hair, not only that, but also because of the many shared practices of the 2, he explained the pheonicians were the remanence of the army of sesostris who had conquered much of the mesopotamia. i dont neccessarily blame people for being ignorant towards us but it is that ignorance that causing people to assume that we are dreaming
marauda777 1 month ago
@kwatemok If you read my earlier comments I demonstrate logic that Hannibal would have been a black man! People talk of Phoenicians like there were millions in North Africa at the time which is not true. The Phoenicians had a small territory in North Africa. They invaded around 600BC. Hannibal 200BC. So over 400 years one would think the Phoenicians would have mixed with the indigenous people. Nations mixed in order to keep peace with neighbors, So argue what you like the man was black
amaribling 1 month ago
@kwatemok You fool Jews are not a people. You might as well say Muslims are a people or race. Peoples of north Africa today are there though the invasion of Islam in 600-700BC and mostly though the Italians killing most of the blacks during 1800-1900AD. Libya for example was most black. The people there now are of Italian origin and other European heritage. Gaddafi knew it and shown the world! People talk so much shit on here and dont have a clue what they even on about too funny..
amaribling 1 month ago
@amaribling you are obviously retarded. learn to tell the difference from jews and followers of judaism. you are mistaking the people for their religion.
kwatemok 1 month ago
@kwatemok No you the retard one! Jews are not a people. Khazarians have fooled you with all that shit. Do you know who the "khazarians" are? Is that all you have to say? You know not to run your mouth about Hannibal! I have more than demonstrated he could never have been a white or an Arab man. Phoenicians, canaanite's, Israelite's ect all had black people. Their is more than enough evidence to back this up. If Jews are a people, lets keep it real the Falasha Jew goes back to Salomon!
amaribling 1 month ago
@amaribling obviously you don't know shit about history, where i on the other hand am a historian for a living. i have no time nor the patience for your stupid conspiracy theories which have no real evidence behind them.
kwatemok 1 month ago
@kwatemok Lets go toe to toe. I have blown out so many of you stupid internationalised academics who have learned history from racist pre 20th century text books that was written by racist European, Khazarians and Arabs scholars who have re written history in order to stop the black man who was in bondage from knowing his history! You want to go their about evidence! Lets do this NOW! Lets start with Kemet. The ancient Kemet people were they black? Hannibal & Moors were they black??
amaribling 1 month ago
@kwatemok What you do for a living is a waste of time as you dont know SHIT!!! North Africans have they always looked the way they did? Were they always Arabs & Europeans? Sub-saharan africa I believe you "Historians" call it, 700AD-1600AD what was going on there? Were they running around naked? What was Europe going though then? You are a professor of bullshit! You picked the wrong person to go here with. I bet you will hit me with Beber shit. Primary sources dont lie & I know them
amaribling 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@amaribling and you imply the jews didn't form a nation nor a people, ancient egyptians and middle eastern peoples were black. you're just a clown, and no one takes you seriously. so please, stop embarrassing yourself. anyone can say anything, but you need evidence to support your wild theories. but i appreciate your effort to prove your point. you made me laugh.
ps - you're not even a licensed historian, no one will listen to you except other frustrated kids like yourself.
kwatemok 1 month ago in playlist al exander and hanibal
@amaribling What was going on in Europe then, The Eastern Roman Empire, The Vikings, The Carolingians, The Normans, The Holy Roman Empire, Inquistion, The reconquista, the hundred years war, The Crusades, the Teutonic Wars, The Mongol Invasions, The Magyar Invasions, not a whole lot. About the same as Africa with the Ghana, Mali, and Songhai Empires, yep not a whole lot.
Liquidsback 4 weeks ago
@Liquidsback I will inform you, the Moors of al-andalus gave to Europeans light during their dark ages. What you need to know is that in those time blacks were Europeans too. They were in high regard and noble stature. What you have meant is nothing of much merit only that those era's brought war. Ghana, Mali, and Songhai Empires brought art and craftsmanship. They were even folding steel. What about the "black plague"! Timbuktu population 100,000 plus-London 20,000 is shit n piss
amaribling 3 weeks ago
@amaribling Yeah the Moors did do that...oh and Timbuktu still has nothing on Constantinople in terms of population.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Oh yeah I forgot what did the people of Constantinople look like? Well they wasnt more Caucasian looking people than black African looking people. Why dont they show what most of the kings and queens of Constantinople looked liked? The reason is they were mostly African looking people! Look at the pictures of the Madonna, they depicted her as a black woman and Christ as a black infant!
amaribling 3 weeks ago
@amaribling You dumb fuck Constantinople was the the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire, the Byzantine stain glasses show Emperor Justinian as a Greco Roman Man. You've lost accept it, because clearly you just don't know what your talking about. You've brought up Candice but she is no more than legend when dealing with Alexander the Great. He historically went no further south in Africa than the Siwa Oasis. You said Constantinople was run by black men when it was clearly Byzantium founded by..
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Greeks and rebuilt by the Roman Emperor CONSTANTINE, I never claimed that The kingdom of Kush, The Kingdom of Axum, The Empire of Ghana, The Empire of Mali, The Empire of Ethiopia, The Nok Civilization, Great Zimbabwe, The Zulu Kingdom, The Songhai Empire, and many other African cultures were founded or run by Arabs and White men. You do not see the oppressed Celtic peoples claiming that other Europeans stole their history, by saying the Roman, Egyptians and etc were Celtic Men.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback And you know something else I'll admit as a European, The kingdom of Jerusalem and the Kingdom of Makuria were Christian allies against the Ayyubid Sultanate of Saladin.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Ancient Egyptians were black admit that! You dont want to admit that the peoples of Ancient North Africa were black too! The influx of Arabs & Europeans wasn't till 600BC-700AD FACT! The Civilization's you have mention are often referred to as Sub- Sahara. I deem that racist as it filters out to mean nothing of any interest and not Civilized by European scholars!
amaribling 3 weeks ago
@amaribling FACT ROME CONQUERED NORTH AFRICA, Fact Egypt had Black Pharaohs, Semitic Pharaohs, and Greek Pharaoh.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@amaribling Fact I never said Egyptians were European, also if Egypt was African the fact is Greek writing and gods are closer to that of Mesopotamia.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@amaribling Also the Greek colony of Cyrene was started in 630 BC.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Well said that's true. Now you have tripped your self up. The greeks started a school of philosophy which was found by Aristippus a pupil of Socrates. This was were they learned from the peoples. If they didnt learn from the people why set up the school there? They also made pilgrimages to kemet which was made famous by Pythagoras. No am I lieing, The Egyptians knew The Pythagorean Theorem for over a thousand years before Pythagoras did?
amaribling 2 weeks ago
@amaribling Yeah, I'll agree with that now were starting to somewhat agree. Except for the Napoleon thing, could the Sphinx have been destroyed by Napoleon.... possible again another legend. But he is not the only one that is credited to destroying the Spinx' nose.
Liquidsback 2 weeks ago
@Liquidsback I don't believe Napoleon could have though, because explosive cannonballs were not invented yet. The Sphinx is pretty durable.
Liquidsback 2 weeks ago
@Liquidsback I never said that all the kings & Queens were black! The Byzantine stain glasses show Emperors that were black too mention that! Its clear you have only become aware of Queen Candice and I assure you its not myth or legend. Her account with Alexander is well documented, only the affair they had is legend! If you want sources holla back at me! Lucius Septimius Bassianus & Marcus Opellius Macrinus just to name a few looool
amaribling 3 weeks ago
@amaribling They're plenty of stain glasses depicting Basil the Bulgar Slayer, Emperor Komenios, Emperor Constantine, did they look Nordic? No they looked Greek.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Now you wanna talk about greeks looool. What do Plato, Socrates, Pythagoras even Aristotle all have in common? They all went to Kemet to get their education or Finnish it! The foundations of what these men came to learn and teach they learn in BLACK KEMET!!! Whats even more funny if it wasn't for BLACK MOORS you wouldn't even know who these men were looool
amaribling 3 weeks ago
@amaribling You want to know something funny they never did no evidence shows, Herodotus probably did. But Aristotle died in Greece never left, also The Romans spread these philosophers to western Europe before the Moors even rose to power. Your just trolling because you lost you Sniveling Ass you can't even spell Finish write.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Pettiness Now! You sound like Mary Lefkowitz "Not Out of Africa: How Afrocentrism Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History" Well like Dr Clake I will blow you out. He didn't go with Alexander however he did go in his youth! Can you say the same for the others I mentioned? Why is it yu dont answer me questions but I answer yours? Please read my questions and answer them if you can?
amaribling 3 weeks ago
@amaribling No there is no scholarly evidence that Plato or Aristotle went to Egypt.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Rosetta Stone + Herocles...
lusulpher 3 weeks ago
@amaribling You're telling me I should get passed my 20th century view of history what year was Black Athena published?
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback I am not quoting black Athena nor have I mentioned it. Scholarly evidence, you mean you know not of any account they went there!
amaribling 3 weeks ago
@amaribling You attack Dr. Lefkowitz who attacked that. The historical basis on books like that aren't really based on evidence. You keep attacking Europeans, and Arabs like it is some conspiracy. When I contradicted you on Europe in the middle ages, you switched to Candice of Kush. When I contradicted you on her meeting Alexander as just a legend, you switched to Constantinople being founded by Blacks, when I contradicted you on that you switched to Greeks stealing from Egypt.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago 2
@Liquidsback You have this twisted. You dont like to answer me. When you dont answer I bring up more for you to disagree with which you do! Contradicted you say? Candice of Kush is more than a legend, you just googled it hence the keyword legend. Conspiracy is the key word again as why would history be re written if it wasn't? Nev er said Greeks stole, I said they learned so get your facts straight!
amaribling 2 weeks ago
@amaribling You keep saying she meet Alexander that is part of the Alexander romance Candice existed, but she never met Alexander.
Liquidsback 2 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Pardon me if you interpreted that. I never said they met. However they engaged each others armies. Alexander withdrew for his reason which I am not wholly sure of. It is more than fair to say he underestimated the kushites therefore had hast to avoid a battle. Never did I say they had a romance! We know of their encounter via black historians such as Chancellor Williams & Dr Cheikh Anta Diop.
amaribling 2 weeks ago
@amaribling The Alexander romance doesn't just mean love, it's basically legends and myths. Like one is he adventured in a submarine, another one is the Gordian knot. As for them not fighting it's opening two fronts, like Hitler did with Britain and the Soviet Union.
Liquidsback 2 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Look give it up. Im not gonna buy your irrational, personal and misconception in this matter. Like I said my sources are Chancellor Williams & Dr Cheikh Anta Diop. Two of the greatest historians of the modern era. The encounter was not a myth. The romance yes, who knows!!!!
amaribling 2 weeks ago
@amaribling That wasn't an attack. Just look up The Alexander Romance it's not just tales of love.
Liquidsback 2 weeks ago
@Liquidsback I have done. If I was to rely on the net I wouldnt get any where. I have looked at the sources Chancellor Williams was able to study. Chancellor Williams makes out in his language and use's the word legend. However in his later work he provides evidence that they never meet but there armies weren't far from each other and ready for combat? You seem like you have great knowledge, however you talk like there isn't a conspiracy to deny blacks in history?
amaribling 2 weeks ago
@amaribling There's a conspiracy all right, however blacks weren't everywhere in history, just as there were not whites everywhere in history. You just keep citing stuff that has been refuted, and contradicted. I'm not trying to offend you or deny black people there history.
Liquidsback 2 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Never said blacks were every where! Looks Africans went to the Americas before Columbus as did Al Idrisi! It goes on & on. I am just highlighting what I know of and there is so much more. However I have come off the subject that first caught my attention Hannibal! All the people on here talk about Phoenicians looking like the people in that area of the world today. The people of today weren't the same people that were there back then fact!
amaribling 2 weeks ago
@amaribling Look let's call this a draw. We aren't going to convince each other. Well played.
Liquidsback 2 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Im cool with that. If you do some research you will find that up until the 1920s it was well known amongst scholars that Africa was the cradle of civilization and black people played a major role in the emergence of Europe. You see that's the time black Americans & west Indians started to question and re gain the knowledge of our 4 fathers. Africans 2day have to remain in the dark about there past as the west & China would loose the influence & control of the resources
amaribling 2 weeks ago
@amaribling Well that's somewhat basically what I teach my students.
Liquidsback 2 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Are you in London?
amaribling 2 weeks ago
@amaribling American
Liquidsback 2 weeks ago
@amaribling You can't win so now you're just trolling.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@amaribling NAme one Byzantine Emperor that was african.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@amaribling Candice is also based on a legend, Alexander never went south of Siwa.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback I could never lose as history doesn't lie! I can prove all that I say. North Africa was never White nor Arab in Ancient times so get that though your thick skull and smoke it!! If you really want me to expose all the lies of Europeans & Arabs let me know as its my pleasure. You want me to let you know that Roman culture was heavily influenced by traditional African villages & Empires!!! If I was you I would get my pre 20th cen books of shit ready to challenge me loool
amaribling 3 weeks ago
@amaribling Oh I never said the Numidians, Moors, and Berbers weren't European or Arab.I've read ancient literature I've read the christian Beowulf, I know Koine Greek, I could read a 3rd century bible as well as you could read this now, do you understand? You see I don't give a shit whether Hannibal, Ramses, or Jesus were Black, Arab, or White but you can't just accept that if they weren't black if you went back and time saw if Hannibal was a blonde and very pale you would cover it up.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback ALL I CARE ABOUT IS THE TRUTH!!!!
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Is Ancient North Africa Black, Arab or white answer the truth if you can?
amaribling 3 weeks ago
@amaribling All three.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Julius Ceasar had a mulatto child with an African queen...
"Caesarion (note the different spelling) was a son born of Caesar and Cleopatra. He was killed by Caesar's adopted son Octavian (actually a nephew), when he was 17. "
Rome printed disfigured coins as propaganda/racial slur against her influence over him. And then they murdered the entire interracial family...You don't see many references to ancient racism, but it was intense.
lusulpher 3 weeks ago
@lusulpher Cleopatra was a descendant of Ptolemy, The Macedonian Greek General who took Egypt after his death. She was also not very pretty look at the coins of her because the Ptolemaic Dynasty like all Pharaohs would inbreed with each other to emulate Osiris, and Isis.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@lusulpher Caesar didn't love Cleopatra, he needed money and grain for his troops and he was pissed after Ptolemy killed Pompey. Augustus also needed Cesarion dead because another heir of Caesar was a threat to his title, and could also start another civil war.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback *Caesar.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Alexander The Great is clearly a mulatto with "Greek"[Arab + albino] physical features, but that is only if you pay attention to the stoneware and mosaics made of his actual skin tone...and not the textbooks that portray all great African/Phoenician/Egyptian/offshoot colonies as being French.
lusulpher 3 weeks ago
@lusulpher Funny because Plutarch described him as pale, brownish blonde hair and one blue eye, and the other brown. Plutarch got his source from Ptolemy his general.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Find the oldest depiction of Hannibal and tell me that is not an African, and then find one from a few hundred years ago...I call it the Tiger Wood's Effect. The more successful they become, the less African.
Or did you never wonder why Rome refused to capitulate to a fellow European? !Hannibal ante portis! the grieving mothers cried, for SIXTEEN YEARS...
lusulpher 3 weeks ago
@lusulpher Yes they also made coins of Hannibal as well.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback If that's so surely you know that Hannibal, Ramses, or Jesus were Black. I have taken it that when people say they dont care they really do! If I was you watch Dr Clake in a debate with Mary Lefkowitz and know how racist scholars have changed history.
amaribling 3 weeks ago 2
@amaribling Black Athena has no historical basis.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Napoleon went around Egypt cannoning the "African noses" off of the statues and monuments. He felt Africans could not have mastered science before Europe had even been colonized, so he took time to censor history as much as he could. Museums today are restoring "European noses" to ancient burial jars...
You will be hard-pressed for "truth" when the scholars are also racist.
lusulpher 3 weeks ago
@lusulpher The Napoleon thing is a legend, also it is attributed to Muhammad Sa'im al-Dahr because Egyptian peasants were making offers to the sphinx.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@Liquidsback Stop chatting shit. Napoleon did disfigure ancient artifacts as he was pissed that black people could have created such marvels. Thats another lie white & Arab scholars have come up with to spin people. You really are a spinner aren't you.
amaribling 2 weeks ago
@Liquidsback The problem here is that Arabs and Europeans keep trying to hijack "Black Ancient History" and interpret as there own! This has only been the case between the last 100-500years since the black man has been freed from bondage & gained knowledge of Africa and its presence worldwide. Since the time of Plato, Socrates, Pythagoras ect it was accepted that Africa was the birthplace of Knowledge & civilization. The European renaissance and reformation changed history!!!!
amaribling 3 weeks ago
@amaribling Accept that Mesopotamia is older than even Egypt.
Liquidsback 3 weeks ago
@kwatemok Glad you removed you pitiful response. You say your are an archaeologist! If this be the case how on gods green earth could you not believe Ancient North Africa was mostly black? I have asked you questions which you can't answer! Conspiracy theories you say, however I had demonstrated what I have said with evidence. Look Indiana Jones, Let me ask you this, Sub-Saharan Africa is this a racist term which suggest non civilized? Was Ancient Kemet 10,000-700BC Black orientated
amaribling 1 month ago
@kwatemok Your response I deem racist hence why you removed it. You called me "frustrated, you're probably a factory worker or something, breaking your back for minimum wage and feeling unachieved (Spell check needed!)". You wasting your time in the pursuit of academic lies. I have gained knowledge off my own merit! While scholars of the last 100years bullshit, scholars of the day reem the benevolence of the black man in Africa! I bet you believe Ramesses II had purple hair lool
amaribling 1 month ago
@amaribling i didn't remove it. it's there. ramessess had red hair, not purple, but LIKE I SAID - YOU ARE NOT A LICENSED HISTORIAN! i can pretend to be a doctor and argue with surgeons telling them they aint doin their job right, but i`m not. now ask yourself why.
kwatemok 1 month ago
@kwatemok You are a first class fool. Historian in your prospective is "His-Story" nothing but lies. Why dont you back up your disagreements with what I have said. Not once have you manged to do this. So Ramesses II was he a Greek, Roman, Arab or maybe an Hittite? Was he a black man? Answer me what I have been asking numerous of times, the ancient Kemet people were they black? Hannibal & Moors were they black? The people who built the sphinx were they black? Did Jewish slaves build it?
amaribling 1 month ago
@tamale26 Well said
amaribling 1 month ago
EVERY FUCKING TIME I SEE A VIDEO ABOUT HANNIBAL SOME FUCKING RACIST NO LIFERS ARGUE IN THE COMMENTS,EVERY TIME!!!!!WOULD YOU PLEASE ALL GO FUCK YOURSELF!!!???
moonkick360 1 month ago
Rome still exist.. ruling behind the scene as the greatest power..
MrBellumeus 1 month ago
very interesting,
abdelmaximus 1 month ago
hail rome!
1canh 1 month ago
What's up with the English accent? lol . .
Rubix0517 2 months ago
@Rubix0517 Is the English accent a problem? The romans spoke Latin, which was considered as the official spokeslanguage in the known world. Today, English is considered as the official worldlanguage, though there are many different types of English. Yet the original English is British English, and therefor the type that fits this show the best :)
Draggis92 2 months ago
@Draggis92
How can can such a primitive language like latin be official in the so called known, was it official in China, was it official in Africa, was it official across Asia or even Europe.
The world is not flat Mr known world!!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 2