@leelow1000 xD you ar funny! They mean the antenna drop first, because the core collapsed first(meaning the cor was blown up)! Btw, even FEMA agree with that!
It is not hard to understand this, weight on something either horizontal or vertical, apply pressure which will break first. I learnt that theory in Junior school.
HOLY SHIT! A FUCKING COCK ROACH GOT SMASHED BY THE FALLING BUILDING! IT MUST BE AN INSIDE JOB!!! LOLOL Seriously? Were going to talk about the antenna now because you really have nothing better to do?
@64adamw64 Science is man made theories, mostly based on man made numbers and symbols put together. Some things in science are correct. Some are flawed. Open your mind a bit. We as humans, do not know shit.
@LOLYouGotTrolled666 well, I think we can both agree on one thing though, that comment was worth removing!! (Yes I got to read it in my inbox even though you deleted it).
Jesus, why has an antenna tilting slightly got anything to do with an inside job? You keep finding reasons in everything. Next it will be, "take a look at this video that the FBI do not want you to see! See the dog walking around the side of the WTC... well take a closer look... that dog only has 3 legs!!!!!.. proving its an inside job!!!"
@Facewest LMFAO You really believe this??? No one was on the roof on 9/11 because the FDNY don't want people go to the top in case of fire like 1993 but on 9/11 it would be a good way out was!
@ck54suiza1 I think the antenna falls together with the south/west walls and from north east it look's like the Antenna dropped! I saw it from all angles and for me it's an illusion that the antenna dropped first! You can see it in other videos, look at the top south/west corner, it fall's exact with the antenna! But for some reason it don't look like a real only gravity driven collapse at all!
so the antenna fell the slightest moment before? I mean I could be open minded for some theories but that just means nothing...I mean the inside was collapsing. the antenna doesnt mean shit.
Omg! I don't care how stupid Bush was or how stupid his team was but there is no way this was an inside job. You guys are looking at everything and twisting it so it fits your story. Its like that movie 23, with Jim carey I think. Basically he finds out that everything has something to do with the number 23. Its like if I said" OMG my keyboard has 100 keys, layed out in 4 rows and my mouse has 2 buttons. 100/4 -2 =23 OMFG!!! "Its nonsense! Us government did not do this nor did they let it happen
Explain to me the physics behind building 7 falling uniformly into its own footprint at free fall speed due to isolated office fires across several floors at different locations throughout the building, and then we can begin to have a conversation about the official story being truth.
@fluffyandpuffy Building 7 burned unchecked for 7 hours with the supply of not jet fuel, but diesel fuel from generators on the lower floors. if you looks closely, at collapse initiation, it moves slightly breaking many windows and before it reaches ground level, it leans to the south and slows down disproving your free fall speed theory. the fires were not isolated, they were huge at the south side where the damage was but could not be visible due to the thick smoke.
@fluffyandpuffy Well you are either ignorant, stupid, or deliberately lying to push an agenda. As WTC 7 did damage to all of the buildings surrounding it. And the same debris pulverized WTC 3, 4, 5 and 6. And yet you half wits still talk about footprints..... Any Demolition company in the world that got results like this would not be in business very long slick. Let alone the elite teams of ninjas that you tin foil hat wearers think pulled this off.
@fluffyandpuffy K building 7 did not fall because of "isolated office fires on several floors at different locations throughout the building". It fell because there was a motherfucking plane on it, thats why. And it falls straight down because the bottom of the building is still solid intact. How do you expect it to fall crookedly if the bottom of the building is solidly anchored into the ground? Hahaha
if there were no bombs planted, they would still be standing today. believe it, if there were JUST planes, the smoke would have went down, just like any other plane crash, and there would be a few damaged floors. theirs no way solid steel buildings could crumble just by fire.
@MrJnasty72 .Tower two clearly leaned over because the planes wing sliced right through the entire side and, I'm sorry to tell you, the support for that top heavy weight is gone when the plane takes out 15-20 floors. So when something that heavy falls..nothing is stopping it..Tower one is the same. It survived longer because it didn't cut the side. Yet their was still 20+ floors of weight support gone. So the support that is intact has more weight to hold but will only last so long. Common sense
@LOLYouGotTrolled666 Nope. The official government reports themselves have stated that the plane impacts destroyed 15-20% of the core columns, and the remaining FIRES caused the already "weakened" portions to be subject to "inferno" tempertatures which, according to them, took the buildings down.No WHOLE floors were destroyed, only fractions, fractions that were designed to have weight distrubuted evenly if any columns were taken out, provided not too many were destroyed at 1 time.
@LOLYouGotTrolled666 And yes Tower 2 was weakened on the side that it leaned, but WHY did it not continue to fall OVER. I am a logger that works with fallers, and I have seen countless trees fall over once they lean to that degree, there is no stopping the fall sideways unless they get hung up in other trees, I.E., resistance. The only way the top half would go straight down is if the path of most resistance was continually eliminated below it during it's fall. Resistance is a strong force.
@buffaloSabrespommy My point was that any object colliding with another encounters resistance to a certain degree depending on circumstances, whether or not it is a 110 story 1 acre building. Yes, that is huge, but you got to figure that the remaining building below had equal mass and floors that were designed to hold many, many times more weight than that, static or dynamic load.Columns were thicker in lower floors. How does 12-30 stories not lose energy as it progresses 90 floors downward?
@yearginclarke my mistake for calling you a moron. but think about how much those 30 floors weigh in a building built like WTC was. Built with a core and a good portion of the load was distributed to the walls thats how they has so much floor space. Once those walls go there are no supports on the floors to support the weight. the core was useless as it was cut in half by the plane.
ppl who say it was the government or ppl like that, that was behind this shit r fukin idiots!! end of the day it was they priks al qeada who done it so shut the fuk up.
@rossm8038 You're a stupid fucking moron if you can't decipher what an explosion is, lol. I'm sorry, but do you believe the government, with hundreds of years of state sponsored terrorism, or your lyin eyes?
@rossm8038 hey dipshit you really think osama or saddam really wanted this war? Look at them now saddam is dead and osama is in some scrubby cave somewhere if he isnt already dead.. Al Qaeda has been growing since 9/11/2001 and why do you think moron - its because we are over there underminding their government killing there citizens abuse their resources... gtfo
Leslie Robertson built ugly week piles of shit way to go u fuckin idiot cocksucker what a fag fuck u i thought they were topers of shit to show off our fuckin stupidity im turnin this fuckin thing off bye
I -highly- recommend that anyone interested in thorough documentation of improbable phenomena check out the video series by YouTube user DavidSChandler and DavidChandler911.
@noozilander Your just an idiot, it costs hardly anything to hijack a plane with a knife, all they needed was knowledge of how to fly a plane, you downer.
@XxTenevaTheReynardxX You poor idiot believing the impossible, go watch the 25 min video showing you the explosions, the pictures of the nano thermite, the sound of explosions of ground level, firefighter testimony, you know, real proof as opposed to theories you believe with absoutely no evidence.
@Xendrius .... You're unbelievably nieve, a massive plane going at what? 200mph? of course its going to explode! the fuel in the fucking plane will blow up? not everything that explodes means its a bomb, if i knew how to fly a plain and was incredibly clever and lucky, i could easily do this, have faith in your fucking country you idiot.
@XxTenevaTheReynardxX Dude, youtube search "how the wtc towers were destroyed", 25 minutes of raw video and audio footage of interviews, science, comparisions, footage of the planes, information on the coverup, and so much more.
Yes, the innercore drops far before the outer even starts to crumble, so it's proof of non natural events regarding what the media claims to be the reason of the crasch.
All simple: All the plane images were computer animations; then they paid some people to talk about planes, etc... The buildings were prepared with bombs and that's all.
Now they're still in Irak and Afghanistan, seeking no one knows whats...
Given that the building pancakes and the antenna is attached to the very top story of the building... it is logical the antenna drops first. It would have to defy gravity for it not too.
@dopenhagen2009 It fell like a building would with a whopping big chunk out of it, large fires, and a few generators going boom inside. Plenty of vids out there with the schematics that illustrate why it fell the way it did.
@dopenhagen2009 Oh, WTC7 was damaged big time. As for the penthouse - same explanation as the antenna - it's on the roof, and that always goes first. Again, plenty of vids explaining/demonstrating why it fell as it did.
@Clarrisani it seems you don´t wanna face the facts. wtc7 collapsed hours after the twin towers without any damage. if you just keep on telling patriotic fairy tales, well there´s no need to discuss any more. 9/11 was an inside job by your fascist government, which 50% of you voted for and would do again, and that´s it.
Secondly, WTC7 was damaged, and was reported as so by several members of the fire authority. For example:
"You looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn't look good." -FDNY Captain Chris Boyle
@Clarrisani Australia and the u.s. always stick together so you are on their side. But the truth is, that there was a building that collapsed without any damage. No matter what a corrupted Captain says.
@dopenhagen2009 I side with the evidence, not conspiracy theorists. As for a building that collapsed with no damage, I didn't hear about that. I know WTC 1 and 2 collapsed due to buckling, 7 due to damage and buckling, and that 3, 4, 5 and 6 were all heavily damaged. There was another building that came down? I'll have to go back through the photos/vids/reports.
@Clarrisani Well, there is no "evidence". In fact there is also evidence for controlled collapse. So what are the facts you rely on? You don´t know the facts. You just know, what you are told about the facts and that´s a difference.
I don´t rely on any "facts", but that several buildings hit by an uncontrolled impact would collapse like with random precision, is not probable.
@dopenhagen2009 There is no evidence for a controlled collapse. The fact that the North Tower core took so long discredits the theory, plus the fact the towers did not fall at free fall speed. They also did not fall into their footprint as people of the Truth movement say, as demonstrated by the debris. No explosive residue was found, but plane parts were.
Two buildings were hit by objects at 500mph. They then burnt at 1200oF, the temperature that reduces the strength of steel by 50%.
@Clarrisani Even if they burnt at such a temperature (what actually they didn´t, it´s physically impossible), then the steel structure has to stand it. The construction adds more than 100% to the required strength and measure of the steel girders. Even the firestorm in Hamburg, when attacked by the allied terror bombers in WW2, did make steel melt. It´s impossible. But they found out that steel girders of WTC where cut by a special explosives technology that cuts like a torch.
@dopenhagen2009 They did burn at that temperature. Several studies plus examining the steal supports this. There are even so called "Truth" videos that support. this. And no one ever said the steel melted. However, the steel did warp under the temperature, plus the buildings had already suffered severe structural damage due to the planes hitting them. Also, they did not find any steel girders that were cut. Please supply evidence of this.
@dopenhagen2009 The towers, already with damaged inner cores, could no longer support the weight of the upper 20 or so stories, and those stories collapsed. Unable to take the weight of the collapse, the 110 story buildings continued down, damaging the surrounding buildings.
My evidence is the images and video, the warped steel at the site, the reports of people there, the experts who work in the field. Where is yours?
There are 100s of videos and images that negate your evidences. Watch them on YouTube. If you cannot accept that, well you don´t have to.
Do you really think, such a building can be constructed in a way that a fire would make it collapse? The plans wouldn´t pass any safety-control. Did you ever hear of a sky-scraper collapsing because of fire? I dind´t.
Forget that tricky pancake theory. It´s impossible. It cannot collapse by fire. Ask an engineer, not a stupid firefighter.
@dopenhagen2009 There are not 100 of videos on YouTube that support this. I have seen the "Truth" videos, but little have evidence. You again ignore the fact that a) the buildings were hit by a plane, and b) the fire was hot enough to warp steal. As for sky-scrapers collapsing due to fire? McCormick Center in Chicago. the Sight and Sound Theater in Pennsylvania. Two examples.
Again, the buildings didn't collapse from fire alone. Engineer's support this.
@Clarrisani Well, it seems, americans don´t have skills in building towers, otherwise they wouldn´t collapse like a house of card whenever something happens. So it´s the u.s. engineers fault and due to that I cannot take serious what one of them says. German or swiss engineers would never build something that collapses because of a little impact. So what you´re telling just proves that u.s. people are stupid, even the engineers.
So I say yes they can collapse when constructed by dumb americans
@dopenhagen2009 Not little impacts. Two 767s are far from small, and moving at 500+ mph caused a great deal of structural damage. Combine this with the fire that weakened the supports, the buildings had little chance. There are engineers that are surprised they stood as long as they did.
The Windsor Tower in Madrid also had the steel collapse, but was saved by the concrete supports that made up most of its construction. Steel does not stand up well in high temperature fires.
because the inside collapses before the outside so the the top just falls before the outside, doesnt mean it was the first thing to fall, its just logic.
The antenna did not drop first. Jesus the back part of the building fell first or the building tilted down on the back side which is why it looks like the antenna drops first.
@ElevationLowJJ REALLY, how would the bottom fall first if it was the top that was hit. If 4 people are standing on each others shoulders and the top one is hit by say a rock. He will fall over not the guy on the bottom. Learn common sense dumb ass
@ElevationLowJJ When it falls it gains speed and takes the rest of it with it, I know I will get spammed for this but when a building is demolished the top floor just collapses on the next then those 2 hit the next, then those 3 hit the next. Etc
I stop believing when E.P.A said the air was safe to breath the air was Toxic, March 2010 judge alvin hellerstien ruled that $713.82 million was not enough for 10,000 people who worked in toxic rubble at ground zero...12 april hearing will resume, i am still holding my breath for outcome. Cheers
Controlled demolition job. Why would the building have fell through the path of greatest resistance. The periods of freefall eliminate the possibility of the pancake theory.
Most of you are quite thick, it's just an illusion. From the first angle given, the whole top portion is falling AND tilting backwards, thus the north face appears to be not moving for a moment (the tilt is offsetting the falling at this point) while the antenna appears to "slip" down.
@awesomeb45 And the US government did let it happen. The current vice president of the time ordered off all military force. The military knew something was happening, but were ordered to stand down.
@lowbrowrodeo Omg! I don't care how stupid Bush was or how stupid his team was but theres no way this was an inside job. You guys are looking at everything and twisting it so it fits your story. Its like that movie 23, with Jim carey I think. Basically he finds out that everything has something to do with the number 23. Its like if I said" OMG my keyboard has 100 keys, layed out in 4 rows and my mouse has 2 buttons. 100/4 -2 =23 OMFG!!! " Us government did not do this nor did they let it happen
at leat the buildings did wat the were supposed to the didnt tip over they were built to go straight down if the went to the side there wouldve been alot more death R.I.P all the brave men and women and the innocent
@aliceinchains898 Huh? They werent supposed to collapse at all.They were built to withstand multiple impacts by a boeing 707 said architect that built them Minoru Yamasaki .and yes, the south tower especially SHOULD have tipped over.It was 22 degrees off center when the building started "collapsing". but somehow that day the laws of physics didnt apply.steel buildings have never collapsed from fire until 9/11 but behold that day an anomaly occured and 3 steel buildings collapsed from fire.hmmm
@mandeemarie03 Call me a crazy bimbo for thinking that there were planted bombs on floor 12, 13, or 14 (One of those). I think this because they shut it down for months and didn't let anyone in. At all. Then a few weeks before 9/11 occurred, this happened. That's just my theory. But I do agree, this totally broke the laws of physics.
I can simulate what happened with the puffs of smoke seen coming out the side of the WTC as it collapsed. Take flour or baby powder and put a small bit in the palm of your hand and then clap....TADA, puffs of dust come shooting out the sides...just like in the video at 1:56.
@zathras Are you saying there was excessive Pamper Powder at the WTC and that accounts for all the talc? Or is it the 2000 tons of concrete per floor of WTC that was turned to talc?
No, what I'm saying is the materials on each floor would be turned to dust and small pieces by the weight of the collapsing floors and blasted out of the sides much like what would happen if you clapped your hands with the flour or baby powder in the palms.
@zathras Well, the concrete is pulverized. And something must account for it because it is pulverized in the air. Otherwise we would see chunks on the ground. But we see no concrete chunks. Some 2000 tons of concrete per floor, 110 floors, all gone.
Not all gone...the majority of the concrete rubble ended up in the basement and was 40-60' high in some places. If you want to see where it went just look up some of the pictures of rescuers digging in the wreckage after the attack for any survivors...plenty of concrete there.
@zathras No, there isn't. There is a distinct lack of concrete. And if you have a link showing Chunks of Concrete, please provide it. The biggest pieces I've seen, here and there, are perhaps 200lbs. And most are a few ounces.
There's nothing to think about and it wasn't planned. The antenna fell first just because of the building being weak in some parts. It probably fell through as soon as it felt the force of the building beginning to fall.
This US Army Veteran, who lost friends in those steel death towers, knows Covert Ops when he sees them-Rules of Covert Warfare being applied to civilian population-in this case the American public (sheeple, useless eaters) The notion there were gaping holes in U.S. Air Defense System allowing an asymmetrical attack of this nature is preposterous. What the hell is NORAD for? Mr. VP Cheney where were U on 9-11 BEFORE the impacts?
Team of at least 50 agents on ground, Bldg. 7 Cmd Bunker, USS George Washington operations ship, UAV provides on-sight, hologram image projected on windowless gray plane, chopper above ceiling commands pre planted demolitions, media shows only pre approved angles, steel cut at 45 degree angles, firefighters betrayed by hero mayor also Knight of Malta, Cardinal Egan the Military Vicar orders Intelligence agencies CIA Mossad...result 10yr occupation in Middle East...millions of Iraqis gone!
Those building were detonates by the government, nothing to hide anymore!
Us government kiil their own people in order to attack Afganistan and iraq, weren't a plane in the pentagono just and clearly a missile, possibly one of US government best friend O. B. Laden are in Saudi Arabia, having a good time! and lien to a world that O.B. Laden has planed everything .
You saw a bank heist, removal of 3 old buildings W/asbestos and corrosion, SEC files destroyed, 2 wars, patriot act, doubling the size of gov, war on terror, wire taping, etc Osama Been Forgotten received no benefit except he was on a Kidney Dialysis machine in some US funded hospital in Pakistan when the towers came down. Follow the money
A plan old fire would not have destroyed all the SEC files and other goodies they did not want to be found. It is rumored that some incriminating JFK items were in WTC7. 911 is the weak link in the war mongers armor, the truth will come out. No statute of limitation on murder.
Well, one, I could care less about this country right now, because it's basically going to shit. Two, when I said "completely blown through," I meant a fucking plane hit it. The core wasn't entirely intact, so the structural integrity of the building wasn't exactly top notch. You and the rest of your truther buddies are the one who are making up facts, saying that the WTC was without a doubt a controlled demolition and whatnot. If anyone's doing a disservice to this country, it's you lot.
ever seen a jet going into a concrete wall at mach 1? well i have in some video i´ve seen some years ago...guess what side of the "impact" is still standing after the smoke has cleared...
yeah the experts said this one collapsed inner core first then then the exterior walls came apart. The south tower was the exact opposite exterior first then core.
Gene Corley (not sure on last name spelling). He was the lead forensic engineer for the wtc attacks. As well as Matthys Levy another structural engineer that investigated 9-11.
I don't think it is totally science fiction to expect the part of the roof with dozens more tons of pressure on it (the weight of the antenna) to drop first. And only by microseconds too.
The floors pancaked during collapse, the top floor (the roof) acutally has an edge around it so if that collapsed first (which holds the antenna) we wouldn't see it from this angle because we assume the top we see is the exact top of the building. It's not.
the middle of the building would go first, and where is the antenna
GAMESHARK2K7 4 months ago
@leelow1000 xD you ar funny! They mean the antenna drop first, because the core collapsed first(meaning the cor was blown up)! Btw, even FEMA agree with that!
74pbg 4 months ago
It is not hard to understand this, weight on something either horizontal or vertical, apply pressure which will break first. I learnt that theory in Junior school.
zerodayz00 5 months ago 2
HOLY SHIT! A FUCKING COCK ROACH GOT SMASHED BY THE FALLING BUILDING! IT MUST BE AN INSIDE JOB!!! LOLOL Seriously? Were going to talk about the antenna now because you really have nothing better to do?
LOLYouGotTrolled666 5 months ago
@LOLYouGotTrolled666 a video out of June 2007 .....but it looks like it is NEW 4 you .. ;-)
keyhole911 5 months ago
@LOLYouGotTrolled666 Do some research about it and then say that.
64adamw64 5 months ago
@64adamw64 Research about what? Sorry dude I have a life and do not believe that science tells all. Get over yourself.
LOLYouGotTrolled666 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LOLYouGotTrolled666 What you meant was, that you are too dumb to understand science.
64adamw64 5 months ago
@64adamw64 Science is man made theories, mostly based on man made numbers and symbols put together. Some things in science are correct. Some are flawed. Open your mind a bit. We as humans, do not know shit.
LOLYouGotTrolled666 5 months ago
Comment removed
LOLYouGotTrolled666 5 months ago
@LOLYouGotTrolled666 well, I think we can both agree on one thing though, that comment was worth removing!! (Yes I got to read it in my inbox even though you deleted it).
64adamw64 5 months ago
@64adamw64 Look down a few inches dickhead. I doubled posted.
LOLYouGotTrolled666 5 months ago
@LOLYouGotTrolled666 stfu dumbcunt stop following the fucking US govt and wake up. Everything you say is absolute shit and no one gives a fuck. cya.
64adamw64 5 months ago
@LOLYouGotTrolled666 stfu dumbcunt stop following the fucking US govt and wake up. Everything you say is absolute shit and no one gives a fuck. cya.
64adamw64 5 months ago
@LOLYouGotTrolled666 stfu dumbcunt stop following the fucking US govt and wake up. Everything you say is absolute shit and no one gives a fuck. cya.
64adamw64 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LOLYouGotTrolled666 stfu dumbcunt stop following the fucking US govt and wake up. Everything you say is absolute shit and no one gives a fuck. cya.
64adamw64 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LOLYouGotTrolled666 stfu dumbcunt stop following the fucking US govt and wake up. Everything you say is absolute shit and no one gives a fuck. cya.
64adamw64 5 months ago
Jesus, why has an antenna tilting slightly got anything to do with an inside job? You keep finding reasons in everything. Next it will be, "take a look at this video that the FBI do not want you to see! See the dog walking around the side of the WTC... well take a closer look... that dog only has 3 legs!!!!!.. proving its an inside job!!!"
leelow1000 6 months ago
@Facewest LMFAO You really believe this??? No one was on the roof on 9/11 because the FDNY don't want people go to the top in case of fire like 1993 but on 9/11 it would be a good way out was!
74pbg 8 months ago
@ck54suiza1 I think the antenna falls together with the south/west walls and from north east it look's like the Antenna dropped! I saw it from all angles and for me it's an illusion that the antenna dropped first! You can see it in other videos, look at the top south/west corner, it fall's exact with the antenna! But for some reason it don't look like a real only gravity driven collapse at all!
74pbg 8 months ago
so the antenna fell the slightest moment before? I mean I could be open minded for some theories but that just means nothing...I mean the inside was collapsing. the antenna doesnt mean shit.
tiki2188 9 months ago
Omg! I don't care how stupid Bush was or how stupid his team was but there is no way this was an inside job. You guys are looking at everything and twisting it so it fits your story. Its like that movie 23, with Jim carey I think. Basically he finds out that everything has something to do with the number 23. Its like if I said" OMG my keyboard has 100 keys, layed out in 4 rows and my mouse has 2 buttons. 100/4 -2 =23 OMFG!!! "Its nonsense! Us government did not do this nor did they let it happen
lochness1202 9 months ago
@lochness1202
=braindead
DimaKamyziak 7 months ago
@lochness1202
Explain to me the physics behind building 7 falling uniformly into its own footprint at free fall speed due to isolated office fires across several floors at different locations throughout the building, and then we can begin to have a conversation about the official story being truth.
fluffyandpuffy 6 months ago
@fluffyandpuffy Building 7 burned unchecked for 7 hours with the supply of not jet fuel, but diesel fuel from generators on the lower floors. if you looks closely, at collapse initiation, it moves slightly breaking many windows and before it reaches ground level, it leans to the south and slows down disproving your free fall speed theory. the fires were not isolated, they were huge at the south side where the damage was but could not be visible due to the thick smoke.
breadsped98 6 months ago
@fluffyandpuffy Well you are either ignorant, stupid, or deliberately lying to push an agenda. As WTC 7 did damage to all of the buildings surrounding it. And the same debris pulverized WTC 3, 4, 5 and 6. And yet you half wits still talk about footprints..... Any Demolition company in the world that got results like this would not be in business very long slick. Let alone the elite teams of ninjas that you tin foil hat wearers think pulled this off.
dgillary 5 months ago
@fluffyandpuffy K building 7 did not fall because of "isolated office fires on several floors at different locations throughout the building". It fell because there was a motherfucking plane on it, thats why. And it falls straight down because the bottom of the building is still solid intact. How do you expect it to fall crookedly if the bottom of the building is solidly anchored into the ground? Hahaha
lochness1202 4 months ago
There was a plane 'on' building 7...learn something new every day
creativenameisnotava 3 months ago
if there were no bombs planted, they would still be standing today. believe it, if there were JUST planes, the smoke would have went down, just like any other plane crash, and there would be a few damaged floors. theirs no way solid steel buildings could crumble just by fire.
MrJnasty72 10 months ago
@MrJnasty72 .Tower two clearly leaned over because the planes wing sliced right through the entire side and, I'm sorry to tell you, the support for that top heavy weight is gone when the plane takes out 15-20 floors. So when something that heavy falls..nothing is stopping it..Tower one is the same. It survived longer because it didn't cut the side. Yet their was still 20+ floors of weight support gone. So the support that is intact has more weight to hold but will only last so long. Common sense
LOLYouGotTrolled666 5 months ago
@LOLYouGotTrolled666 Nope. The official government reports themselves have stated that the plane impacts destroyed 15-20% of the core columns, and the remaining FIRES caused the already "weakened" portions to be subject to "inferno" tempertatures which, according to them, took the buildings down.No WHOLE floors were destroyed, only fractions, fractions that were designed to have weight distrubuted evenly if any columns were taken out, provided not too many were destroyed at 1 time.
yearginclarke 3 months ago
@LOLYouGotTrolled666 And yes Tower 2 was weakened on the side that it leaned, but WHY did it not continue to fall OVER. I am a logger that works with fallers, and I have seen countless trees fall over once they lean to that degree, there is no stopping the fall sideways unless they get hung up in other trees, I.E., resistance. The only way the top half would go straight down is if the path of most resistance was continually eliminated below it during it's fall. Resistance is a strong force.
yearginclarke 3 months ago
@yearginclarke hey moron this was a 110 ten story behemoth, not a fuckin oak tree
buffaloSabrespommy 3 months ago
@buffaloSabrespommy My point was that any object colliding with another encounters resistance to a certain degree depending on circumstances, whether or not it is a 110 story 1 acre building. Yes, that is huge, but you got to figure that the remaining building below had equal mass and floors that were designed to hold many, many times more weight than that, static or dynamic load.Columns were thicker in lower floors. How does 12-30 stories not lose energy as it progresses 90 floors downward?
yearginclarke 3 months ago
@yearginclarke my mistake for calling you a moron. but think about how much those 30 floors weigh in a building built like WTC was. Built with a core and a good portion of the load was distributed to the walls thats how they has so much floor space. Once those walls go there are no supports on the floors to support the weight. the core was useless as it was cut in half by the plane.
buffaloSabrespommy 3 months ago
before the north tower collapse, the antenna tilts before the whole building collapse.
some say that when the south tower collapsed its movement was towards southeast
and the north tower collapsed towards the south
ck54suiza1 10 months ago
ppl who say it was the government or ppl like that, that was behind this shit r fukin idiots!! end of the day it was they priks al qeada who done it so shut the fuk up.
rossm8038 1 year ago
@rossm8038 You're a stupid fucking moron if you can't decipher what an explosion is, lol. I'm sorry, but do you believe the government, with hundreds of years of state sponsored terrorism, or your lyin eyes?
mit26chell 1 year ago
@rossm8038 hey dipshit you really think osama or saddam really wanted this war? Look at them now saddam is dead and osama is in some scrubby cave somewhere if he isnt already dead.. Al Qaeda has been growing since 9/11/2001 and why do you think moron - its because we are over there underminding their government killing there citizens abuse their resources... gtfo
Bojoe777NaBl 1 year ago
Proof that the interior columns buckled.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
The upper section of the building tilts back a little then begins to fall and the smoke rising around the roof makes it hard to tell.
A man survived on the roof he held on to the base of the antenna riding it all the way down and later climb down to the firemen.
Facewest 1 year ago
@Facewest Bullshit! The doors to the roof were locked.
chrisjoke 1 year ago
@Facewest No he didn't
tryithere 1 year ago
It was their own country who did it.USA wanted a war for the most oil in the world.
HeathBrotherz 1 year ago
@HeathBrotherz the USA wanted this? their own country did it? damn i dont know where the hell i was when they all decided this!
12godbless 1 year ago
Leslie Robertson built ugly week piles of shit way to go u fuckin idiot cocksucker what a fag fuck u i thought they were topers of shit to show off our fuckin stupidity im turnin this fuckin thing off bye
ramstarider 1 year ago
I -highly- recommend that anyone interested in thorough documentation of improbable phenomena check out the video series by YouTube user DavidSChandler and DavidChandler911.
OneVoiceMore 1 year ago
Are there any braindead monkeys out there that still, that believe it was just 19 cavemen with boxcutters? LMAO!
noozilander 1 year ago 2
@noozilander well you have to admit, it was pretty easy for anybody to do such a thing back then... barely any security and all...
12godbless 1 year ago
@12godbless not to mention construction was going on daily at the Trade Centers
Bojoe777NaBl 1 year ago
@noozilander Your just an idiot, it costs hardly anything to hijack a plane with a knife, all they needed was knowledge of how to fly a plane, you downer.
XxTenevaTheReynardxX 7 months ago
@XxTenevaTheReynardxX You poor idiot believing the impossible, go watch the 25 min video showing you the explosions, the pictures of the nano thermite, the sound of explosions of ground level, firefighter testimony, you know, real proof as opposed to theories you believe with absoutely no evidence.
Xendrius 7 months ago
@Xendrius .... You're unbelievably nieve, a massive plane going at what? 200mph? of course its going to explode! the fuel in the fucking plane will blow up? not everything that explodes means its a bomb, if i knew how to fly a plain and was incredibly clever and lucky, i could easily do this, have faith in your fucking country you idiot.
XxTenevaTheReynardxX 7 months ago
@XxTenevaTheReynardxX Dude, youtube search "how the wtc towers were destroyed", 25 minutes of raw video and audio footage of interviews, science, comparisions, footage of the planes, information on the coverup, and so much more.
Xendrius 7 months ago
the government did
teroy5 1 year ago
Yes, the innercore drops far before the outer even starts to crumble, so it's proof of non natural events regarding what the media claims to be the reason of the crasch.
ohmmeters 1 year ago
Now this is strange.. The skeleton made it for a couple of seconds after the collapse.. But the core columns didn't..?
Zapust 1 year ago
freeze ar 0:29 and look at the right
Gandalf54231 1 year ago
so what the happened with the antenna? nothing abnormal
1984metalhead 1 year ago
All simple: All the plane images were computer animations; then they paid some people to talk about planes, etc... The buildings were prepared with bombs and that's all.
Now they're still in Irak and Afghanistan, seeking no one knows whats...
Clear?
Damn pigs...
oryjen 1 year ago
Given that the building pancakes and the antenna is attached to the very top story of the building... it is logical the antenna drops first. It would have to defy gravity for it not too.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
look closely at 0:40 part of the colums are still up
312pspman 1 year ago
@MERCURHILLMANIAC u didnt kno that
aliceinchains898 1 year ago
How was the lobby blown out anyway several hundred feet below the impact?
Eyewitnesses report it looked like bombs had gone off.
It couldnt possibly be fireballs down the lift shafts because it was designed with that exact scenario in mind
The lifts terminate at different floors and you have to get off and and go to another lift.
There was only ONE lift that stopped at each floor in each building.
It was built as an emergency lift for fire rescue services etc
zenoist2 1 year ago
It cannot collapse like that without explosives.
dopenhagen2009 1 year ago
@dopenhagen2009 It can, and it did.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
@Clarrisani and how about wtc7?
dopenhagen2009 1 year ago
@dopenhagen2009 It fell like a building would with a whopping big chunk out of it, large fires, and a few generators going boom inside. Plenty of vids out there with the schematics that illustrate why it fell the way it did.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
@Clarrisani but wtc7 was the house that collapsed without any damage.... no?
dopenhagen2009 1 year ago
@dopenhagen2009 Oh, WTC7 was damaged big time. As for the penthouse - same explanation as the antenna - it's on the roof, and that always goes first. Again, plenty of vids explaining/demonstrating why it fell as it did.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
@Clarrisani it seems you don´t wanna face the facts. wtc7 collapsed hours after the twin towers without any damage. if you just keep on telling patriotic fairy tales, well there´s no need to discuss any more. 9/11 was an inside job by your fascist government, which 50% of you voted for and would do again, and that´s it.
dopenhagen2009 1 year ago
@dopenhagen2009 Firstly, I'm Australian. Not my government.
Secondly, WTC7 was damaged, and was reported as so by several members of the fire authority. For example:
"You looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn't look good." -FDNY Captain Chris Boyle
Clarrisani 1 year ago
@Clarrisani Australia and the u.s. always stick together so you are on their side. But the truth is, that there was a building that collapsed without any damage. No matter what a corrupted Captain says.
dopenhagen2009 1 year ago
@dopenhagen2009 I side with the evidence, not conspiracy theorists. As for a building that collapsed with no damage, I didn't hear about that. I know WTC 1 and 2 collapsed due to buckling, 7 due to damage and buckling, and that 3, 4, 5 and 6 were all heavily damaged. There was another building that came down? I'll have to go back through the photos/vids/reports.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
@Clarrisani Well, there is no "evidence". In fact there is also evidence for controlled collapse. So what are the facts you rely on? You don´t know the facts. You just know, what you are told about the facts and that´s a difference.
I don´t rely on any "facts", but that several buildings hit by an uncontrolled impact would collapse like with random precision, is not probable.
dopenhagen2009 1 year ago
@dopenhagen2009 There is no evidence for a controlled collapse. The fact that the North Tower core took so long discredits the theory, plus the fact the towers did not fall at free fall speed. They also did not fall into their footprint as people of the Truth movement say, as demonstrated by the debris. No explosive residue was found, but plane parts were.
Two buildings were hit by objects at 500mph. They then burnt at 1200oF, the temperature that reduces the strength of steel by 50%.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
@Clarrisani Even if they burnt at such a temperature (what actually they didn´t, it´s physically impossible), then the steel structure has to stand it. The construction adds more than 100% to the required strength and measure of the steel girders. Even the firestorm in Hamburg, when attacked by the allied terror bombers in WW2, did make steel melt. It´s impossible. But they found out that steel girders of WTC where cut by a special explosives technology that cuts like a torch.
dopenhagen2009 1 year ago
@dopenhagen2009 They did burn at that temperature. Several studies plus examining the steal supports this. There are even so called "Truth" videos that support. this. And no one ever said the steel melted. However, the steel did warp under the temperature, plus the buildings had already suffered severe structural damage due to the planes hitting them. Also, they did not find any steel girders that were cut. Please supply evidence of this.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
@dopenhagen2009 The towers, already with damaged inner cores, could no longer support the weight of the upper 20 or so stories, and those stories collapsed. Unable to take the weight of the collapse, the 110 story buildings continued down, damaging the surrounding buildings.
My evidence is the images and video, the warped steel at the site, the reports of people there, the experts who work in the field. Where is yours?
Clarrisani 1 year ago
@Clarrisani lol
There are 100s of videos and images that negate your evidences. Watch them on YouTube. If you cannot accept that, well you don´t have to.
Do you really think, such a building can be constructed in a way that a fire would make it collapse? The plans wouldn´t pass any safety-control. Did you ever hear of a sky-scraper collapsing because of fire? I dind´t.
Forget that tricky pancake theory. It´s impossible. It cannot collapse by fire. Ask an engineer, not a stupid firefighter.
dopenhagen2009 1 year ago
@dopenhagen2009 There are not 100 of videos on YouTube that support this. I have seen the "Truth" videos, but little have evidence. You again ignore the fact that a) the buildings were hit by a plane, and b) the fire was hot enough to warp steal. As for sky-scrapers collapsing due to fire? McCormick Center in Chicago. the Sight and Sound Theater in Pennsylvania. Two examples.
Again, the buildings didn't collapse from fire alone. Engineer's support this.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
@Clarrisani Well, it seems, americans don´t have skills in building towers, otherwise they wouldn´t collapse like a house of card whenever something happens. So it´s the u.s. engineers fault and due to that I cannot take serious what one of them says. German or swiss engineers would never build something that collapses because of a little impact. So what you´re telling just proves that u.s. people are stupid, even the engineers.
So I say yes they can collapse when constructed by dumb americans
dopenhagen2009 1 year ago
Comment removed
Clarrisani 1 year ago
@dopenhagen2009 Not little impacts. Two 767s are far from small, and moving at 500+ mph caused a great deal of structural damage. Combine this with the fire that weakened the supports, the buildings had little chance. There are engineers that are surprised they stood as long as they did.
The Windsor Tower in Madrid also had the steel collapse, but was saved by the concrete supports that made up most of its construction. Steel does not stand up well in high temperature fires.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
because the inside collapses before the outside so the the top just falls before the outside, doesnt mean it was the first thing to fall, its just logic.
Jiminibobster 1 year ago
did they find the antenna after clean out all the rubbish?
PLACEBOgarbage 1 year ago
1:55 LOL @ the big explosion. Yeah, non-demolition my ass
discountbacon 1 year ago
@discountbacon watch?v=bMZ-nkYr46w Watch it then think again
bluedrago505 1 year ago
the core vanish in the air
WTF!!!
extractormann 1 year ago
the antenna hardly moves to the side - only down! WTF is this?
Bluedino549 1 year ago
Sorry the entire structure failed at that moment. It's not just the antenna.
Grospoliner 1 year ago
The antenna did not drop first. Jesus the back part of the building fell first or the building tilted down on the back side which is why it looks like the antenna drops first.
0Slipknot0 1 year ago
In real collapse, the bottom should fall first instead of the top.
ElevationLowJJ 1 year ago
@ElevationLowJJ ya in a real collapse but this was clearly a demolition :D
NWOmustfall 1 year ago
@NWOmustfall Watch this watch?v=bMZ-nkYr46w then say that
bluedrago505 1 year ago
@ElevationLowJJ REALLY, how would the bottom fall first if it was the top that was hit. If 4 people are standing on each others shoulders and the top one is hit by say a rock. He will fall over not the guy on the bottom. Learn common sense dumb ass
bluedrago505 1 year ago
@bluedrago505 Watch more demolition video.
ElevationLowJJ 1 year ago
@bluedrago505 The weight for that portion wasn't enough to crush all the bottom floors.
ElevationLowJJ 1 year ago
@ElevationLowJJ When it falls it gains speed and takes the rest of it with it, I know I will get spammed for this but when a building is demolished the top floor just collapses on the next then those 2 hit the next, then those 3 hit the next. Etc
bluedrago505 1 year ago
@bluedrago505 Have you got any idea how strong those buildings are?
ElevationLowJJ 1 year ago
@ElevationLowJJ 20 stories of cement falling on 1 story will cause a chain reaction
bluedrago505 1 year ago
@bluedrago505 watch?v=bMZ-nkYr46w
ElevationLowJJ 1 year ago
@ElevationLowJJ Thanks for the Link
bluedrago505 1 year ago
Comment removed
ElevationLowJJ 1 year ago
@bluedrago505 Seen some smoke shooting out 30 floors below? Could you explain what causes that?
ElevationLowJJ 1 year ago
@ElevationLowJJ The building collapsing, I thought that would be obvious
bluedrago505 1 year ago
I stop believing when E.P.A said the air was safe to breath the air was Toxic, March 2010 judge alvin hellerstien ruled that $713.82 million was not enough for 10,000 people who worked in toxic rubble at ground zero...12 april hearing will resume, i am still holding my breath for outcome. Cheers
MrDoverben22 1 year ago
Anyone who thinks they are watching a "gravity only" collapse here is in denial!!!
There are HUGE parts of building being ejected hundreds of yards!! Conclusion: Inside Job
getoffutube 1 year ago
Search: september clues info
Please watch and discuss.
munwuglus 1 year ago
watch steel at 1:17, it's standing there. STEEL. Standing upright. And then it falls... ???
bigpizza112 2 years ago
obviously an inside job
lowaces 2 years ago
totally
sbac57 2 years ago
Controlled demolition job. Why would the building have fell through the path of greatest resistance. The periods of freefall eliminate the possibility of the pancake theory.
Heatherinthebuff 2 years ago
Most of you are quite thick, it's just an illusion. From the first angle given, the whole top portion is falling AND tilting backwards, thus the north face appears to be not moving for a moment (the tilt is offsetting the falling at this point) while the antenna appears to "slip" down.
LoudHoward 2 years ago
face in smoke at 0:29 ... : 0
pthizzy12 2 years ago
if the US government didn't do it, they sure let it happen.
lowbrowrodeo 2 years ago 25
@lowbrowrodeo very well said.
docshuck 1 year ago
@lowbrowrodeo That is more believable
fidelamaya26 1 year ago
@lowbrowrodeo no what are u talking about
awesomeb45 1 year ago
@awesomeb45 And the US government did let it happen. The current vice president of the time ordered off all military force. The military knew something was happening, but were ordered to stand down.
GTFOVevo 10 months ago
@lowbrowrodeo Omg! I don't care how stupid Bush was or how stupid his team was but theres no way this was an inside job. You guys are looking at everything and twisting it so it fits your story. Its like that movie 23, with Jim carey I think. Basically he finds out that everything has something to do with the number 23. Its like if I said" OMG my keyboard has 100 keys, layed out in 4 rows and my mouse has 2 buttons. 100/4 -2 =23 OMFG!!! " Us government did not do this nor did they let it happen
lochness1202 9 months ago
at leat the buildings did wat the were supposed to the didnt tip over they were built to go straight down if the went to the side there wouldve been alot more death R.I.P all the brave men and women and the innocent
aliceinchains898 2 years ago 16
@aliceinchains898 omg imagine if the buildings tipped over and landed down in the middle of the streets....
dolphinmagic24fan 1 year ago
@dolphinmagic24fan thatd be horrible
aliceinchains898 1 year ago
@aliceinchains898 Huh? They werent supposed to collapse at all.They were built to withstand multiple impacts by a boeing 707 said architect that built them Minoru Yamasaki .and yes, the south tower especially SHOULD have tipped over.It was 22 degrees off center when the building started "collapsing". but somehow that day the laws of physics didnt apply.steel buildings have never collapsed from fire until 9/11 but behold that day an anomaly occured and 3 steel buildings collapsed from fire.hmmm
mandeemarie03 10 months ago
@mandeemarie03 Call me a crazy bimbo for thinking that there were planted bombs on floor 12, 13, or 14 (One of those). I think this because they shut it down for months and didn't let anyone in. At all. Then a few weeks before 9/11 occurred, this happened. That's just my theory. But I do agree, this totally broke the laws of physics.
GTFOVevo 10 months ago
At about 156 you can see the detonation spouts all down the building as it went down.
rob1233212006 2 years ago
I can simulate what happened with the puffs of smoke seen coming out the side of the WTC as it collapsed. Take flour or baby powder and put a small bit in the palm of your hand and then clap....TADA, puffs of dust come shooting out the sides...just like in the video at 1:56.
zathras 2 years ago
@zathras Are you saying there was excessive Pamper Powder at the WTC and that accounts for all the talc? Or is it the 2000 tons of concrete per floor of WTC that was turned to talc?
IExposeMormonism 2 years ago
No, what I'm saying is the materials on each floor would be turned to dust and small pieces by the weight of the collapsing floors and blasted out of the sides much like what would happen if you clapped your hands with the flour or baby powder in the palms.
zathras 2 years ago
@zathras Well, the concrete is pulverized. And something must account for it because it is pulverized in the air. Otherwise we would see chunks on the ground. But we see no concrete chunks. Some 2000 tons of concrete per floor, 110 floors, all gone.
IExposeMormonism 2 years ago
Not all gone...the majority of the concrete rubble ended up in the basement and was 40-60' high in some places. If you want to see where it went just look up some of the pictures of rescuers digging in the wreckage after the attack for any survivors...plenty of concrete there.
zathras 2 years ago
@zathras No, there isn't. There is a distinct lack of concrete. And if you have a link showing Chunks of Concrete, please provide it. The biggest pieces I've seen, here and there, are perhaps 200lbs. And most are a few ounces.
IExposeMormonism 2 years ago
There's nothing to think about and it wasn't planned. The antenna fell first just because of the building being weak in some parts. It probably fell through as soon as it felt the force of the building beginning to fall.
clickclocks 2 years ago
yes, it was planned and I agree there is nothing to think about.
orange70383 2 years ago
So everyone's saying the goverment planeed to blow up the WTC?
Yeah the fuck right, they wouldnt let people in the buildings if they were gonna blow it up!!
hockeyforever89 2 years ago
Yes, they fuckin would!!! I f you would know what people would do for power. Destroy some and save millions....
o0MELLY0o 2 years ago
yea right, are you serious. Hope you are part of the few in your thoughts.
orange70383 2 years ago
PREMISE: Jet fuel fires caused steel to melt, thus causing collapses.
FACT: In the history of steel frame construction no building has ever collapsed due to fire of any kind.
REASON: Steel melts @1370degrees(2500F) lowest estimate.
Jet fuel burns @ 800degrees(1500)
CONCLUSION: Jet fuel simply does not get hot enough to melt steel.
BTW: melt + weaken + degrade = SEMANTICS !
God Bless Us All
intheknow7 2 years ago
This US Army Veteran, who lost friends in those steel death towers, knows Covert Ops when he sees them-Rules of Covert Warfare being applied to civilian population-in this case the American public (sheeple, useless eaters) The notion there were gaping holes in U.S. Air Defense System allowing an asymmetrical attack of this nature is preposterous. What the hell is NORAD for? Mr. VP Cheney where were U on 9-11 BEFORE the impacts?
intheknow7 2 years ago
every body knows what hapend terisom and bombing
gigglingg 2 years ago
Maybe you should take a look at it from another angle, it's an illusion.
Weirdo10o4 2 years ago 2
Team of at least 50 agents on ground, Bldg. 7 Cmd Bunker, USS George Washington operations ship, UAV provides on-sight, hologram image projected on windowless gray plane, chopper above ceiling commands pre planted demolitions, media shows only pre approved angles, steel cut at 45 degree angles, firefighters betrayed by hero mayor also Knight of Malta, Cardinal Egan the Military Vicar orders Intelligence agencies CIA Mossad...result 10yr occupation in Middle East...millions of Iraqis gone!
fjtease 2 years ago
Those building were detonates by the government, nothing to hide anymore!
Us government kiil their own people in order to attack Afganistan and iraq, weren't a plane in the pentagono just and clearly a missile, possibly one of US government best friend O. B. Laden are in Saudi Arabia, having a good time! and lien to a world that O.B. Laden has planed everything .
Hitler was naughty but he did love his peoples!
vegatu 2 years ago
"Those building were detonates by the government, nothing to hide anymore"
Another twoofer heard from.
Denierbud11 2 years ago
never seen somef these clips....thanks for posting
BushBlewUpTwinTowers 2 years ago 2
You saw a bank heist, removal of 3 old buildings W/asbestos and corrosion, SEC files destroyed, 2 wars, patriot act, doubling the size of gov, war on terror, wire taping, etc Osama Been Forgotten received no benefit except he was on a Kidney Dialysis machine in some US funded hospital in Pakistan when the towers came down. Follow the money
patriot4u 2 years ago
Yes, must easier to destroy the entire building (WTC 7) then to just have a local fire that destroyed the files (SEC). Nothing like over kill huh?
LOL
Denierbud11 2 years ago 2
A plan old fire would not have destroyed all the SEC files and other goodies they did not want to be found. It is rumored that some incriminating JFK items were in WTC7. 911 is the weak link in the war mongers armor, the truth will come out. No statute of limitation on murder.
patriot4u 2 years ago
So now, fire cannot even destroy office items!
LOL
"It is rumored that some incriminating JFK items were in WTC7."
This is so truther logic ... who the hell made this up?
Denierbud11 2 years ago
the lunatic is delusional...probably flips burgers at MCD.
neilzep 2 years ago
WEAR IS THE FALLING MONEY!!!
999000999001 2 years ago
U R Correct pearl harbour
cairnssaravanan 2 years ago
The antenna does NOT fall first as can clearly be seen in this video: watch?v=e64yr9SZb-Q&feature=related
The antenna in fact momentarily stops.
BCJ1985 2 years ago 2
@filmmakingonline
The only strange thing about this, is that these buildings even fell at all.
paustn31634 2 years ago
Well the main structural support was mainly take from the outer strucker.. The elevator shafts also helped support the building...
Bentrot 3 years ago
"Well the main structural support was mainly take from the outer strucker.."
Not true. The core could hold up the buildings on their own. Check the original drawings.
R.
electrique527 2 years ago
The core could hold up the buildings on its own if it hadn't been completely blown through by a large aircraft.
fafnir242 2 years ago
Sorry, what? "completely blown through"? Where do you get that from?
Even the NIST report astimates 40% of the core DAMAGED, not destroyed, and that is a highly criticized assumption.
Why are you making up "facts"?
You do a big disservice to your government and country. Around the world, everyone knows what has happened there. Only in the USA ... ah never mind.
Ignorance is bliss, no?
R.
electrique527 2 years ago
Well, one, I could care less about this country right now, because it's basically going to shit. Two, when I said "completely blown through," I meant a fucking plane hit it. The core wasn't entirely intact, so the structural integrity of the building wasn't exactly top notch. You and the rest of your truther buddies are the one who are making up facts, saying that the WTC was without a doubt a controlled demolition and whatnot. If anyone's doing a disservice to this country, it's you lot.
fafnir242 2 years ago
Sorry, what is a truther?
Who is talking about demolition? I am not.
I just say that the explanations given so far can not be correct, and wonder why nobody is investigating.
NIST (yes, THE Nist) did not explain the collapse.
But its all basic engineering calculations!
With all the high-tech stuff they have now they can not even check the 50 year old manual calculations?
I am not buying that.
electrique527 2 years ago
ever seen a jet going into a concrete wall at mach 1? well i have in some video i´ve seen some years ago...guess what side of the "impact" is still standing after the smoke has cleared...
Wall: 1 -- Plane: 0 (or even below)
Hunne2303 2 years ago
Was no concrete in the walls of the wtc.
mlrs84 2 years ago 2
This actually supports the no explosive position, the author here is an idiot.
Denierbud11 3 years ago
yeah the experts said this one collapsed inner core first then then the exterior walls came apart. The south tower was the exact opposite exterior first then core.
newdad1107 3 years ago
who said this?
Denierbud11 3 years ago
Gene Corley (not sure on last name spelling). He was the lead forensic engineer for the wtc attacks. As well as Matthys Levy another structural engineer that investigated 9-11.
newdad1107 3 years ago
There's nothing strange about this.
I don't think it is totally science fiction to expect the part of the roof with dozens more tons of pressure on it (the weight of the antenna) to drop first. And only by microseconds too.
The floors pancaked during collapse, the top floor (the roof) acutally has an edge around it so if that collapsed first (which holds the antenna) we wouldn't see it from this angle because we assume the top we see is the exact top of the building. It's not.
filmmakingonline