Oreskes is a merchant of disinformation, which is considerably more dangerous than doubt. Her claim that climatologists at East Anglia, Penn State and elsewhere were harassed because they refused to obey laws which grant transparency to a taxpayers funding scientific research is laughably false. Doubters: Read the e-mails, which are widely available. They show a clear pattern and practice of deception by leading climatologists, who did indeed seek--in their own words--to "Hide the Decline."
@FrederickJZarguna Who is paying you? Or are you one of the dupes who buys into the shit this tiny little group of bought and paid for scientists spouts at the behest of big oil etc etc? mmm?
Naomi Oreskes is a scientifically inept and a poor historian. Her famous claim of a scientific consensus based on 900 papers missed more than 11,000... Her grasp of science is so poor she isn’t familiar with the pH scale, thinks Beryllium is a heavy metal, mistakenly assumes that CO2 is trapped in the troposphere, and climate models can predict forest fires and floods. Embarrassingly, Oreskes doesn’t understand the difference between reactive oxygen and radioactive oxygen. (“American Thinker”)
The beautiful comrade Dr Oreskes the historian says it right, the debate has long been over. Capitalist countries CO2 emissions, are 1000000 times more harmful than CO2 emissions from communist countries like China
Let's see, physicists, not climatologists, eh? Cool, I'll believe them...incidentally, I'm on my way to having heart surgery performed by my dentist!
DrTadHusseinWinslow 7 hours ago
Oreskes is a merchant of disinformation, which is considerably more dangerous than doubt. Her claim that climatologists at East Anglia, Penn State and elsewhere were harassed because they refused to obey laws which grant transparency to a taxpayers funding scientific research is laughably false. Doubters: Read the e-mails, which are widely available. They show a clear pattern and practice of deception by leading climatologists, who did indeed seek--in their own words--to "Hide the Decline."
FrederickJZarguna 3 weeks ago
@FrederickJZarguna Who is paying you? Or are you one of the dupes who buys into the shit this tiny little group of bought and paid for scientists spouts at the behest of big oil etc etc? mmm?
MW2rapesBlackOps 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Naomi Oreskes is a scientifically inept and a poor historian. Her famous claim of a scientific consensus based on 900 papers missed more than 11,000... Her grasp of science is so poor she isn’t familiar with the pH scale, thinks Beryllium is a heavy metal, mistakenly assumes that CO2 is trapped in the troposphere, and climate models can predict forest fires and floods. Embarrassingly, Oreskes doesn’t understand the difference between reactive oxygen and radioactive oxygen. (“American Thinker”)
olavodeca 4 months ago
The beautiful comrade Dr Oreskes the historian says it right, the debate has long been over. Capitalist countries CO2 emissions, are 1000000 times more harmful than CO2 emissions from communist countries like China
JoeJohn90 9 months ago 2
Great and important interview.
THank you.
rapauli 10 months ago