Okay, you fairy. Anarcho-communism is a paradox in itself. You have to have a gov't to make communism work, because you have to have a coercive force to make everyone give away their possesions. If you don't have a coercive force to force people to give away their possesions, no one is going to give anything away. Therefore communism can't work.
ur an idiot, seperation from church and state? there is no state in anarcho communism. im an anarcho capitalist, ur clearley not a anarcho communist because u believe in the state, i highly advise u all to look up mike shanklin on youtube
POSER!!!!! I SMELL BULLSHIT BECAUSE YOU SURE DIDNT SEEM VERY ANARCHIST TO ME...AND U SLIPPED UP AND SAID ANARCHO-SOCIALIST.....FUCK SOCIALISM TRUE ANARCHO COMMUNISM IS THE WAY TO GO
@SwaggerKing22 Many Communists typically advocate Socialism to transition to Communism. Socialism is simply workers controlling the resources and wealth they generate through their labor, theres nothing wrong with that. I'm a Libertarian Communist, and I support ParEcon first, to get to a Communist society.
Anarcho-Communists are more likely to prefer going straight to a communist society, however that doesn't they can't support a Socialist economy to get there.
You mean there is more people like me in America? You forgot though you have to start somewhere to get to full Communism. There has to be transition. Read MarxEngels and then Kropotkin to get a broad sense of it.
Wait a minute, did you just start this video by saying you think we can legislate your problems away? Your just a communist bro. Stop confusing people as to what anarchy means.
If you wanna be a communist you can donate money to the state. Don't drag all of us down that dirt phat to pay forced money to illigal wars and health care!!
@KneelingAtlas property rights? how would it really be considered private "property" under communism? Also, please inform me who are the "rational anarchists"? Are you an Anarcho-Capitalist/minarchist/libertarian or something?
@XxAmericanLedxX Communism is a centrally planned concept, it is not anarchy. Anarchy means without rulers, if there are no rulers, how would scares resources be distributed without private property and capital?
To call myself an anarcho-capitalist would be to add an unnecessary suffix to my philosophy. I am an anarchist, which means I don't justify the initiation of force for anyone for any reason; if you can agree with that assessment, you and I are of like minds.
@iXanthous Anarcho-Communists are certainly free to not exercise their property rights if they so choose, would you initiate force against me for exercising mine?
@KneelingAtlas You just call yourself an anarchist? nothing else? I guess I don't blame you... there's too many damn Anarcho-______ labels. I don't even know what to call myself at this point. Anarcho Communist? Social libertarian? One guy said my views were like Marxism but I don't support the state. Well I guess it's nice to see that we agree on the non-aggression principle.
@XxAmericanLedxX I don't believe anyone has a just right to initiate force upon another, that makes me an anarchist; the fact that I accept the concepts of self ownership and individual property rights makes me a capitalist. I find it unnecessary to to call myself an anarcho-capitalist because to do so would lend legitimacy to 'anarcho-communists'. If you call yourself an anarcho-communist I invite you to explain to me how scarce resources could be allocated without property rights or a state.
@KneelingAtlas Many people like iXanthous say "Voluntary association" but here is where I get a bit hippy-dippy... I Personally like the ideas put forth by Jacques Fresco with The Venus Project. His idea is to try to use the earths resources efficiently by making easily updated, eco-friendly products. This is where voluntarism takes a departure- he calls for a resource based economy with an autonomous workforce. His philosophy is that technology is here for us to use and make lives easier.
@KneelingAtlas Cont.- Sadly this hasn't been used anywhere because our government doesn't want to lose power so I can't point to an example of it being used. I don't really think capitalism of any form can really work, especially without control. Eventually some businesses will get larger... eventually beating out the competition and eventually turning in to monopolies. Eventually the power that they hold (just due to human nature) would supersede the NAP. So I think Jacques model would work...
Okay, you fairy. Anarcho-communism is a paradox in itself. You have to have a gov't to make communism work, because you have to have a coercive force to make everyone give away their possesions. If you don't have a coercive force to force people to give away their possesions, no one is going to give anything away. Therefore communism can't work.
ConRevolutionary 1 week ago
This is a joke right?
SmoothPlayLLC 2 weeks ago
ur an idiot, seperation from church and state? there is no state in anarcho communism. im an anarcho capitalist, ur clearley not a anarcho communist because u believe in the state, i highly advise u all to look up mike shanklin on youtube
sassmaster8 1 month ago
Comment removed
koliber231 1 month ago
Comment removed
koliber231 1 month ago
Why do you keep talking about what you want from the state if you consider yourself some form of anarchist?
mikebaal 1 month ago
...moron
SanguineBullet667 3 months ago
POSER!!!!! I SMELL BULLSHIT BECAUSE YOU SURE DIDNT SEEM VERY ANARCHIST TO ME...AND U SLIPPED UP AND SAID ANARCHO-SOCIALIST.....FUCK SOCIALISM TRUE ANARCHO COMMUNISM IS THE WAY TO GO
SwaggerKing22 4 months ago
@SwaggerKing22 Many Communists typically advocate Socialism to transition to Communism. Socialism is simply workers controlling the resources and wealth they generate through their labor, theres nothing wrong with that. I'm a Libertarian Communist, and I support ParEcon first, to get to a Communist society.
Anarcho-Communists are more likely to prefer going straight to a communist society, however that doesn't they can't support a Socialist economy to get there.
BaboonJihad 3 months ago
@SwaggerKing22
You mean there is more people like me in America? You forgot though you have to start somewhere to get to full Communism. There has to be transition. Read MarxEngels and then Kropotkin to get a broad sense of it.
TheProverbialHater 1 month ago
Jesus H Christ. Mother Earth as a 'person'.
The irony of stating that he is 'anarcho-' and then stating 'maybe we can legislate for that...' later on. Look up the meaning of anarchy.
lcpdesign 5 months ago
Wait a minute, did you just start this video by saying you think we can legislate your problems away? Your just a communist bro. Stop confusing people as to what anarchy means.
Equity213 6 months ago
Anarchists are being targeted in Israel as those "running' the demonstrations.
Please search: Indor: The Anarchists are Coming Out of the Closet
on the Arutz 7 News page
We know the drill: A bomb goes off. Anarchists are blamed. Haymarket hangings.
Please repost on Anarchist sites. I am being blocked out of them.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
SilverRedIndigo 6 months ago
You're right about Israel. Israel is a crooket evil state based on murder.
turbofritz2 6 months ago
If you wanna be a communist you can donate money to the state. Don't drag all of us down that dirt phat to pay forced money to illigal wars and health care!!
turbofritz2 6 months ago
Anarcho-Capitalism is true Freedom. It empowers the Individual, not like communism where only collectives have rights. Read Murray Rothbard.
Leftovervictim1991 7 months ago
Anarcho-Communism is absolute non-sense; how do you abolish property rights without a state?
This clown calls himself a anarchist talking about borders, legislation, and separation of church and state?
Giving rational anarchists a bad name.
KneelingAtlas 7 months ago
@KneelingAtlas property rights? how would it really be considered private "property" under communism? Also, please inform me who are the "rational anarchists"? Are you an Anarcho-Capitalist/minarchist/libertarian or something?
XxAmericanLedxX 5 months ago
@XxAmericanLedxX Communism is a centrally planned concept, it is not anarchy. Anarchy means without rulers, if there are no rulers, how would scares resources be distributed without private property and capital?
To call myself an anarcho-capitalist would be to add an unnecessary suffix to my philosophy. I am an anarchist, which means I don't justify the initiation of force for anyone for any reason; if you can agree with that assessment, you and I are of like minds.
KneelingAtlas 5 months ago
@KneelingAtlas Voluntary association. I agree that for shouldn't be initiated. Anarcho-Communism and Anarcho-Capitalism are not exclusive.
iXanthous 5 months ago
@iXanthous Anarcho-Communists are certainly free to not exercise their property rights if they so choose, would you initiate force against me for exercising mine?
KneelingAtlas 5 months ago
@KneelingAtlas No, no I wouldn't
iXanthous 5 months ago
@KneelingAtlas You just call yourself an anarchist? nothing else? I guess I don't blame you... there's too many damn Anarcho-______ labels. I don't even know what to call myself at this point. Anarcho Communist? Social libertarian? One guy said my views were like Marxism but I don't support the state. Well I guess it's nice to see that we agree on the non-aggression principle.
XxAmericanLedxX 5 months ago
@XxAmericanLedxX I don't believe anyone has a just right to initiate force upon another, that makes me an anarchist; the fact that I accept the concepts of self ownership and individual property rights makes me a capitalist. I find it unnecessary to to call myself an anarcho-capitalist because to do so would lend legitimacy to 'anarcho-communists'. If you call yourself an anarcho-communist I invite you to explain to me how scarce resources could be allocated without property rights or a state.
KneelingAtlas 5 months ago
@KneelingAtlas Many people like iXanthous say "Voluntary association" but here is where I get a bit hippy-dippy... I Personally like the ideas put forth by Jacques Fresco with The Venus Project. His idea is to try to use the earths resources efficiently by making easily updated, eco-friendly products. This is where voluntarism takes a departure- he calls for a resource based economy with an autonomous workforce. His philosophy is that technology is here for us to use and make lives easier.
XxAmericanLedxX 5 months ago
@KneelingAtlas Cont.- Sadly this hasn't been used anywhere because our government doesn't want to lose power so I can't point to an example of it being used. I don't really think capitalism of any form can really work, especially without control. Eventually some businesses will get larger... eventually beating out the competition and eventually turning in to monopolies. Eventually the power that they hold (just due to human nature) would supersede the NAP. So I think Jacques model would work...
XxAmericanLedxX 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@XxAmericanLedxX why don't you send me an email at kneelingatlas@gmail.com and we can continue this conversation?
KneelingAtlas 5 months ago
Anarcho-commies ftw.
SebbeSucksBawlz 8 months ago 2