Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (227)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @BloatedSensation. They don't have to pay it upfront. She can request a payment plan. And she will obtain a DJ on them. The money she can put into building a sovereign community instead of personal enrichment which is not even possible cos d $3b is mere notes.

  • yep evoke common law jurisdiction in court they shit themselves its like oh not another one

  • yea it is just an unsigned presentment. Click your heels three times Dorothy!

  • thank you for what you do.

  • Has Irene-Maus Gravenhorst received this $3 billion? Or is she pursuing this fee?

    Thanks

  • @smoky2004 She has not received it, nor will she ever - an unreasonable contract is not valid. If I told you I'd pay you $3billion to cut my lawn, then, after you cut it, I refused to pay you and you sued me, do you think there's a judge in the world that would award you the $3billion? They'd tell you that you were an idiot if you were actually expecting to get $3billion for cutting someone's lawn, and, at best, they'd likely award you a reasonable payment for the work you provided.

  • I would like to find a sovereign group in my area. I'm in the tricity area of NY.

  • @Kaywoodel  go to the Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry. Or the Freedom Law School.

  • @SuperRenegade666 Correction Freedom-School

  • I bet if most people went to court and tried that "I Do Not Consent" stuff they'd just end up in jail anyway. Even if this stuff is technically true and they're supposed to let you go if you say it, things are so far gone and the Illuminati system is so pervasive, do you really think they'd actually back down just because you tell them no? No, they'll do what they want to do to and with you anyway because they know they have all the power.

  • Comment removed

  • "My" property tax bill, drivers' license, bank statement & checks, auto insurance contract depict all the letters of my forename--middle initial/middle name--surname in capital letters as expected under admiralty law. My voting card does not; only the initial letters are capitalized. I know not why.

  • @AgonyInCrisis Your Voting card is Their way of conning you (the man/woman) into accepting their representation of you and gaining agreement to contract for all those other contracts that you mentioned. It is your ticket into the world of admiralty law or Merchant Law. It creates for them the "bridge" if you will to their codified law.

  • Comment removed

  • I will not to enter into a contract with her . I do not consent! I waive all benefit!

  • The judges are bought

  • When are the masses going to stop in their tracks and "Wake-Up!" to understand, and address the fact that we have ALL been lied to and deceived for centuries by a very small percentage of the world's population for total control over us purely for their own fanatical man-made beliefs that they are "Gods chosen people!" Please; read: wake-upbeforeitstoolate(dot)co­m and come together as one voice and "Wake-Up" to what life and living should truly be.

    "And the truth shall set you free!!"

  • If you want to understand HOW to really address the court and understand what is going on then read CLERKS PRAXIS. Additionally, you should visit your Law Library and study AM JURIS OR CORPUS JURIS SECUNDE and study the topics ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, ADMIRALTY LAW, COMMERCIAL LAW (UCC), CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, CONTRACT LAW, BILLS AND NOTES, NOTARY, and many more subjects. MOST IMPORTANT STUDY NATURAL LAW (read the kaballion for a primer.)

  • The proper way to attack the court is to ACCEPT THE CHARGES FOR VALUE AND CONSIDERATION. You look foolish raising the isue of status in a commercial court. You are a merchant whether you want to be or not because you interact and engage in business with other individuals and most of you use Federal Reserve Notes to do it. Any Public Official who tells you that the courts are practicing real Law is either a LIAR or an Idiot. In my experience it is the latter.

  • Under Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution the Legislature can create tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court. Every Branch of government has its own courts. most Attorneys are ignorant of real Law. They only know procedural law. Most Sovereigns are more educated than Attorneys when it comes to real Law. Common Law is the wise decisions of Judges made collectively over time. These Judgments were made based off Natural Law. If Law doesn't derive from something unchanging then it's an opinion

  • When I read the comments I see a lot of individuals who just repeat what theve heard or they are Attorneys or some other type of public SERVANT attempting to direct people off the path.

    These are Article 1 Legislative tribunals, these are not courts of law. Statutes are not LAW. Judges who enforce stautes are acing in the capacity of an administrator. In Roman CIvil Law, Administrative Law was for SLaves.

  • The judge ignored "common law jurisdiction" cos it has no basis in law.Common law is Iaw determined through the decisions and precedents set in court Not consenting to the law does not make you "free", it makes you an outlaw. And I don't know if the word "perjorize" even exist.s. She seems like a nice well intentioned lady but her understanding of law has as much credibility as her "aligning chakras" stuff.

  • @MsCrazyCuckoo well ok.. then why did the judge dismiss the case?/ because the judge didn't know the law? Why would the judge just ignore common law jurisdiction?

  • What a stupid bitch.

  • @TheEodtch - Ad Hominem attacks are the easiest and laziest fallacies to engage in. Great job! =) Can you explain how she is stupid, and how she is a bitch? Otherwise your comment just makes you look like a potentially ignorant douchebag because it makes it look like you can only hurl an insult and not even back it up with any reason or any constructive criticism.

  • @DivergentFilms blah blah blah. You bore me. I didn't write to you I'm not explaing anything to you if you can't see whats before your eyes.

    Constructive criticism is she is an idiot. Bye

  • there are some real nuts in this world.

  • @TheEodtch - Thanks for your first hand demonstration. You clearly argue like a 12 year old, and spell "explaing" like an 8 year old. Being purposely obtuse and hurling insults only reinforces the fact that your opinion is both uninformed and not to be taken seriously. Grow up, dude. Buh bye.

  • @huskavarna While I share your sentiment towards TheEodtch, we have to stop giving these trolls the time of day ... but, it's up to you. Nonetheless, it's obvious that TheEodtch hasn't come to understand why the video you posted is so powerful and necessary. Thanks for the upload. Peace to you.

  • Excellent. Subbed & invite sent

  • love the man in the leather jacket , he said it all If we were all as smart as him we wouldnt rest until every last one of those spivs are in jail where they belong

  • dude u guys have got to help me. idk how to say all these "no consent" things.

  • can i do this in the US ??

  • ur kinda hot Irene..

  • @theTRUTHHertz1 i 2nd that motion LOL

  • JUSTICE for NATIVE Canadians and Americans and for all the common people.

  • very nice

  • you are an awesome and brave woman. A few years ago I started working for the Great Spirit and life is good and I am proud to say that I work no more for dark forces.

    How can we get our names taken out of the government system ?

  • I feel what the folks are saying here. But as i have said before even mentioning things like Mars etc Is not going to get through to morons. You're talking to "people" who's reaction to anything that isn't on their tv is ahuahu haha hehe giggle giggle. He just said Mars, what a douche bag ahuahuahu. It's Like trying to get through to beavis and butt head when you try and educate the average imbecile on the street about the kinda things that folks like Irene teach about.

  • @thetableswillturn well said. people have been taught a specific way of how the system works and they assume its the right way, when you present an alternative method people actually get offended and feel as if you are attacking them. They feel threatened by your intellegence and disregard it as BS. these are some of the same people who have been screwed by the system, how ironic..

  • @kevo795 Well said!!!

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Its one thing to state on a video what you have done in court. Its another to actually have the court session on video as proof, where is the transcript from the hearing ? is there any record ???

  • Thank you Irene for opening my eyes to the true law.

  • I am man on the land in the UK that has not submitted any documentation to the necessary authorities about my re-claiming of rights, and as such, the statutes still apply to me. But, I was on a night out, and very drunk, and was abusive to the Metropolitan Police of London, and I am NOT proud of that. The officer had every right to do me for drunk and disorderly, but I said that magic phrase, I DO NOT CONSENT, AND I WAIVE THE BENEFITS. It worked like a charm, so learn that phrase soberly. Thanks

  • @DaWillyChin "It worked like a charm, so learn that phrase soberly. Thanks

    .

    BOLD FACED BULLSHIT

  • Comment removed

  • @DaWillyChin This is a big deal, and you learned it in a way that gives you no doubt. It may have been a blessing in disguise that even you feel you were guilty, lol! Retaining your freedom in a situation like this shows you (and me) that you truly are free when you declare it. Nice one! Many Blessings:)

  • the most shocking thing to me is rothschild on the notice.

  • ok so last year i was driving a company truck in the limmits of the of 160k of my residence when by a alberta peace officer ask for a log book i had none they changed the law with out notice to me well never mind that as a truck driver how does freeman help me ???? can i still claim this????

  • @truckerguy72 "ask for a log book i had none they changed the law with out notice to me "

    .

    YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO KEEP ABREAST OF THE LAWS PERTAINING TO YOUR PROFESSION.

  • WOW GET A LIFE!!!!!!!

  • pls. this woman is a pure shit talker! First of all what were ur charges? 2nd of all the judge aint scared of u and didnt give a shit about what u knew or didnt know. The judge didnt wanna waste time n tax dollars on something stupid like ur case. Common law Jurisdiction didnt do shit for u. and there is literally NO INFORMATION here. anyone can make a video and say "i just went in front of the judge and said common law jurisdiction and he let me go" ur a shit talker and ur also a moron. Thank u

  • @EgyptPrincessa next time im in court ill try that. id rather try somthing then bend over. youll like to bend over any chance you get??? people like you are letting this world become nazi germany...

  • @EgyptPrincessa

    I would have to say that YOU are the shit talker....no lawyer or judge in the last 30 years has actually read the books...everything they use in courts and law offices are templates...nobody has really read Black's law from back in the day.

    This is not a place for people liek you who are self appointed criminals AND lawyers for yourself...this is not about "lock your doors and roll up the windows before you get out for the cop" deal..this a deal in which you basically copywrite

  • Might we not replace our sun with one that uses clean-burning natural gas? It would bring down, by 87%, the average family's sunburn-ointment costs.

  • Thanks for for your fucking help! That shit did NOT work! I went into court saying exactly what this dumb broad said and the judge didn't dismiss nothin!

  • @iaranda1985

    You should post more of what happened. Be specific.

  • @iaranda1985 only works in commonwealth countries

  • @bigcree I would love to see a Native American run for president, I would personally help campaign. Our clock in this time and spance is running out, the native culture has the right frame of mind and thought, both spiritually and global preservation.

  • @umhalil I lost patience for Idiots like that one, long ago. We can no longer afford to be so naive and gullible. Time to grow up and learn how to think for ourselves and taste real freedom for once.

  • @umhalil Hear ya on that! How stupid this one is.

  • Irene needs to be arrested under the mental health act. She's a nutbar!

  • @17scarz You speak like a fool @17scarz. Revealing to us all what a brainless idiot looks like.

  • lol.

  • There strengh and there speed are still based in a world of rules.Because of that they will never be as strong and fast as you can be " what are you tring to tell me that I can dodge bullets" No Neo, Im tring to tell you that when your ready you won't have to

  • Jacob Rothschild is listed as a defendant?

  • @FreedomCanada2010

    Rothschild? The same Rothschild that formed the rogue state calling itself Israel? The same Israel that stands charged as guilty, for the mass murder of thousands of Americans on Sept 11th 2001, and the subsequent murder of 1 million plus Iraqis. Rothschild= Ashkenazi = Nazi . Period!

  • @jackfr3 ya she sued him .. he is listed right beside gordon cambell

  • @jackfr3

    That might be somewhat true, but there are fundamental differences between the ZioNazis and the German Christians (aka "Nazis"). You can google the online article:

    "The European Volunteer Movement in World War II"

    Also, we should remember that Indians (from India), Arabs, and Black Africans allied with the German Reich to free themselves from oppressive colonial rule by the British[banking]Empire. Search YouTube using keywords:

    "Multiracial SS"

  • @jackfr3 The States allowed and Highly Potetially Assisted the 9/11 Attacks otherwise it would not have happened.

  • @jackfr3: YES! Someone who is in the know! Good luck to you in life, friend! FREEDOM!

  • Wow, real change. Irene rocks! How do I help / join?

  • how can you learn from her. does she share her knowledge

  • Comment removed

  • And further to that; it's all a pile of wishy-washy crap. Grow up, you sad bitch.

  • Silly sods. If they don't want to live by the rules of the land they should f@ck off somewhere else!

  • @landogriffinscool Laws of the land? Wow you have alot of education to seek my friend. Especially when you are directing your comment at Irene, who obviously knows more about this subject then you do. Sometimes its best for you to keep your mouth shut and open your eyes bro. Did I piss you off? Good. Time to wake up!

  • @landogriffinscool There are no rules of the land anymore - only rules of fictional entities or corporations, such as the State of California and the United States, or the United Kingdom

  • @rolandsize "i hope one day all people learn the laws and become sovereign"

    .

    AND END UP IN PRISON

  • Hahahaha fuckin' a!

  • Fuccckkk YEEAAAAH

  • Whats the update on this??

  • God Bless you!

  • Good vid. Liked, (god, how I hate the new rating and comments systems) and Favorited!

  • Will you marry me?

  • what is the deal in the US with this? How can I learn more?

  • @paulagloria look up jordan maxwell

  • NOTHING MAKES ME HAPPIER than seeing pompous pricks like venuecam get put behind bars, it is funny as hell to watch. First they are in denial and yap non-stop, then they start to wake up to reality, then you can see them physically deflate as the reality that they are going to prison for years sets in.... I LOVE WATCHING IT.

  • @greywolf424 so put me in prison tough guy. I'll have you in debt up to your teeth before anyone lays a hand on me :D

    Good luck,

    Your friendly creditor x

  • @venuecam ". I'll have you in debt up to your teeth before anyone lays a hand on me :"

    IN YOUR DREAMS FUCK STAIN

  • @venuecam "so put me in prison tough guy." . YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW HAPPY THAT WOULD MAKE ME . "I'll have you in debt up to your teeth before anyone lays a hand on me :" . IN YOUR DREAMS FUCK STICK, ANY KIND OF LEGAL ACTION YOU ATTEMPTED WOULD FAIL. YOU DON'T GET PAID ANYTHING FOR BREAKING THE LAW. . "Your friendly creditor" . SPENT A LITTLE TOO MUCH TIME SUCKING ON YOUR CRACK PIPE TONIGHT CLEARLY
  • @greywolf424 how can someone who claims to be so learned be soooooo spiteful. I think you need som tender loving care x

  • That's Gangsta!!! IRENE IS MY HEEEEEEEEEERO!!!:-)))

  • Hello...for more of this info google: MARY CROFT

    She opened my eyes!!!

  • Hello...for more of this info google: MARY CROFT

    She opened my eyes!!!

  • @mtown7 do more research instead of blindly following everything you hear

  • what happened to ratings? Has YouTube decided that ratings aren't worth anything anymore?

  • (THIS SHOULD BE READ LAST- BOTTOM 2 POSTS ARE 1st) when the judge asked me to state my name i said i dont have a name, but i am here for that matter, i am a man, a living human bieng with rights that I dont waive, and i dont want any benefits this court is offering. i then said if u want a name for the record, the spelliing is capital C lowercase h ...... , capital J lowercase o ...... i then stood there and she said DISSMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Justice provailed

  • @ucc1207wop = FAKE SHILL ACCOUNT

  • @ucc1207wop

    " then stood there and she said DISSMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Justice provailed "

    PROVE IT.

  • As you can see i had alot on the line here. In court i did not sign the advice of rights form (as it takes away your rights). The court deputy and the defense attorney tried several (5) times to get me to do so. I told the attorney i dont want his representation, but he could represent the DEBTOR if he wished an he didn't respond.

  • this vid is just 1of the many seeds that were planted in my brain that began to wake me up. 3/24/10 I had a trail date for an open intoxiicant motor vehicle (driver). 93 day charge and or $500 fine and 2 point on my fresh license that i filed bankruptcy to obtain.

  • ok, love this video on Irene but her "claim of common law"

    is a little confusing as :

    Common law is law developed by judges through decisions of courts and similar tribunals (also called case law), rather than through legislative statutes or executive branch action. A "common law system" is a legal system that gives great precedential weight to common law,[1] on the principle that it is unfair to treat similar facts differently on different occasions.[2] The body of precedent is called -

  • @AlwaysONTHERISE247

    wasnt common law determined by courts de jure and not the defacto courts pretending to represent humanity... do you get the distinction?? your opinions?

  • @AlwaysONTHERISE247 There was no court de jure in her case. The judge dismissed it because by Irene claiming common law jurisdiction there then had to be a jury to determine the facts of the case. There wasn't. Case dismissed.

  • @venuecam

    "The judge dismissed it because by Irene claiming common law "

    PROVE IT WAS DISMISSED..... YOU CAN'T BECAUSE IT WASN'T. JUST LIKE WHEN SHE TRIED TO SCAM THE BANK AND GOT THROWN OUT OF HER HOUSE FOR DEFAULTING ON THE MORTGAGE

  • @greywolf424 prove it wasn't instead of spewing utter tripe. Do you even know what a court de jure is?

  • @venuecam

    "prove it wasn't instead of spewing utter tripe. "

    PROVE IT WAS, YOU CAN'T BECAUSE HE IS LYING

  • @greywolf424 wow you really seem to want to make Irene look bad.

    I don't have to prove anything she does or says. She made the statement so if you say she's lying then prove it. C'mon I dare you. I really want you to prove she's lying. Really. Go on.

  • @venuecam

    ". C'mon I dare you. I really want you to prove she's lying. Really."

    PROVE HER CASE WAS DISMISSED.....

  • @greywolf424 you still don't know what a court de jure is. I now assume you don't even understand the difference between a statute and a law. Maybe one day you might. I hope you do because you seem to be a very angry and confused being.

  • @venuecam

    '"ou still don't know what a court de jure is."

    WRONG.

    " I now assume you don't even understand the difference between a statute and a law"

    WRONG AGAIN. UNLIKE YOU WHO PROBABLY NEVER GRADUATED HIGH SCHOOL, I MINORED IN LAW IN UNIVERSITY. I HAVE FORGOTTEN MORE ABOUT THE LAW THAN YOU WILL EVER KNOW.

  • @greywolf424 what is a court de jure? You still haven't answered cos you still don't know. Educated? Try again.

  • @venuecam WELL SO FAR YOU HAVE LIED ABOUT HER CASE BEING DISMISSED, PROVEN YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT CONTRACT LAW, AND SHOWN YOU ARE TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND THAT STATUES ARE LEGALLY DEFINED AS: Statute: The word is often used to distinguish law made by legislative bodies from case law (common law) and the regulations issued by Government agencies. Statutes are sometimes referred to as legislation or "black letter law". As a source of law, statutes are considered primary authority. ENJOY PRISON

  • @greywolf424 still waiting for you to show evidence the case was dismissed. You're all hot air mate. Everytime you post I laugh uncontrollably heehee

  • @venuecam

    Statute: The word is often used to distinguish law made by legislative bodies from case law (common law) and the regulations issued by Government agencies. Statutes are sometimes referred to as legislation or "black letter law". As a source of law, statutes are considered primary authority (as opposed to secondary authority).

  • @greywolf424 your opinion of the word "statute" amuses me. A Statute is LEGISLATION that has been given the force of law by the consent of the governed.

    To interpret that so you'll understand - if I do not wish to accept it by way of contracting (administratively, verbally or passively) then I am not subject to it. For someone who claims to have a tertiary education in law you sure know how to put your foot in it.

  • @venuecam

    "your opinion of the word "statute" amuses me. "

    .

    THAT IS THE LEGAL DEFFINITION.... LOSER.

    "if I do not wish to accept it by way of contracting (administratively, verbally or passively) then I am not subject to it. "

    .

    SO BY THIS STATEMENT IT SHOWS YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT CONTRACTS AND YOU ARE SUBJECT TO LAWS WHETHER YOU WANT TO BE OR NOT.

  • @greywolf424 ahh LEGAL definition. The same LEGAL (legislation) that is given the force of law (not actual law) by the consent of the governed.

    Your law education has your mind in dreamland because you've been taught nothing but legal fictions. Have a nice sleep all the same x

  • @venuecam Irene Gravenhorst TRIED SPEWING THIS BULLSHIT, THAT IS HOW SHE LOST HER HOUSE.... FUNNY VIDEO ON YOUTUBE OF HER EVICTION.  MAKES ME SMILE EAR TO EAR SEEING PEOPLE LIKE YOU GETTING BEATEN AT YOUR OWN LITTLE GAME.

  • @greywolf424 Funny how your claim she was evicted ended in all men tresspassing being turned away... by a tiny little weaponless woman. Isn't it wonderful the power that ordinary people like Irene have over un enlightened legal fictions? Sometimes I wake up smiling about al the good things people like her are teaching the world daily. It's a wonderful life :D

  • @venuecam "Funny how your claim she was evicted ended in all men tresspassing being turned away..."

    NO THEY WEREN'T SHE WAS THROWN OUT ON HER ASS, MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD.

  • @greywolf424 So point me to the e-v-i-d-e-n-c-e. Please.

  • @venuecam "It's a wonderful life :"

    IT WILL BE ONCE YOU ARE BEHIND BARS, AND THAT WON'T BE LONG IN COMING

  • @greywolf424 can't understand you. Talk to me when you wake up x

  • @venuecam YOU BREAK THE LAW, YOU GO TO JAIL.... BOTTOM LINE,.... AND NOT ONE WORD OF YOUR BULLSHIT OR IMPOTENT THREATS OF LAWSUITS THAT WILL NEVER SEE THE INSIDE OF A COURTROOM WILL CHANGE THAT.

  • @greywolf424 I don't break common law therefore I don't go to jail :D

    Found out what "ad hominem" or "court de jure" means yet? Didn't think so. Sleepy sleep Zzz Zzz

  • @venuecam

    " I don't break common law therefore I don't go to jail :D"

    BREAK ANY LAW AND YOU GO TO JAIL..... THEY DON'T NEED YOUR CONSENT, YOU DON'T EVEN NEED TO BE PRESENT TO BE CONVICTED. ASK ROMAN POLANSKI.

  • @greywolf424 Polanksi is a paedophile. I'm not. Sorry to dissapoint you. Sounds like you know a lot about kiddie fiddlers. How bizarre.

    P.S. RP isn't in jail either. Explain that genius.

  • @venuecam "RP isn't in jail either."

    HE WILL BE THE SECOND HE STEPS FOOT IN NORTH AMERICA, NOT SURPRISED YOU WOULD DEFEND A PEDOPHILE.

  • @greywolf424 sorry to dissapoint you once again. I don't defend paedophiles. You have a strange habit of misquoting and misinterpreting info regularly. To state you are well versed in any subject including law would be yet another fallicy.

    Go back to convincing yourself you're righteous. At least you believe you. Byeeeee

  • @venuecam "At least you believe you. "

    SO DO PLENTY OF OTHERS, PROBABLY DUE TO THE FACT I AM RIGHT.

  • @venuecam this grey guy...is a pedophile? what is the deal?

  • @greywolf424 lol. your smrat.

  • @greywolf424 wow. a legal scholar using ad hominem language to argue. You've run out of ideas mate.

    I don't contract = I'm not subject to the statutes (legislation given the force of law, not law, by the consent of the governed. LOL) related to them. The only law I'm subject to is common law. Good night sleepy.

  • @venuecam

    "I don't contract = I'm not subject to the statutes"

    YOU DON'T KNOW A FUCKING THING ABOUT CONTRACTS.... CLEARLY. OH AND YOU ARE SUBJECT TO THEM, HOPE YOU ENJOY PRISON BECAUSE I AM GOING TO LOVE SEEING YOU BEHIND BARS.

  • @venuecam " The only law I'm subject to is common law. Good night sleepy."

    COMMON LAW IS APART OF THOSE STATUES..... ENJOY PRISON ASSHOLE, GOD KNOWS I AM GOING TO ENJOY SEEING YOU BEHIND BARS.

  • @greywolf424 Stating you have a tertiary educated in statutes means nothing  to anyone who actually knows the difference between a statutes and a law. Statutes are not law. Go back to school and learn the difference

  • @venuecam "Stating you have a tertiary educated in statutes means nothing to anyone who actually knows the difference between a statutes and a law."

    .

    SOMETHING YOU CLEARLY DON'T

    . "Statutes are not law."

    .

    THEY SURE THE FUCK ARE.

    . "Go back to school and learn the difference  "

    .

    I HAVE FORGOTTEN MORE ABOUT REAL LAW THAN YOU WILL EVEN KNOW, AND I CAN NOT WAIT TO SEE THE DAY YOUR ASS IS THROWN BEHIND BARS WHERE IT BELONGS.

  • @greywolf424 Statutes are given the force of law through mutual consent. The applications you fill out are contracts that ACTIVATE the statutes. I won't write more I've proven it on my channel. CAPS only make your ignorance easier to see. Try normal writing then you won't be putting up a neon sign that says "I'm ignorant of my contracts and lack any conprehension of the nature of my enslavement and don't want you or anyone else to see this."

    More like a paid shill. You have an agenda!

  • @VerifiedNews YOU ARE A LYING SACK OF SHIT WITH AN AGENDA,,,.... ACCORDING TO COMMON LAW.

    .

    STATUTE, n. AN ACT OF LEGISLATURE; A PARTICULAR LAW ENACTED AND ESTABLISHED BY THE WILL OF THE LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT, EXPRESSED WITH THE REQUISITE FORMALITIES.

  • @greywolf424

    Niice... lol

  • this isn't about any one group. everyone has the same rights as everybody else. EVERYONE can do this. imagine that?

  • VERY GOOD:)) I wish the best to such a positive sovereign:))

    LOVE THE EVICTION!!! There must be accountability:)) and why shouldn't the defacto court suffer the foreclosure crisis as everyone else?:)) lol

    LOVE YOU ALL!!!

    From the Sovereign Church of Christ and

    LOOOOOONG

  • "LOVE THE EVICTION!!! "

    Me too, she is now officially homeless her scam was an epic failure.

  • I love you Irene!!!

    peace and conscience love to us all~~~

  • I love this girl... Booya... Keep up the great work... All the people of the land are counting on brave people like you to show the way!!! I am greatful for you! Thank you... Really... THANK YOU!!

  • yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeessssss­ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss­sss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! affirmative fuckin action

  • I've known some people through business associates - who IN GOOD FAITH, did some "volunteer" work for the so called "Sovereign Squamish" and lost their home. TO ANYONE READING THIS AND CONSIDERING THIS: Be VERY VERY CAREFUL of those who claim sovereignty and freedom, yet live in a trailer park and drive a beat up Chevy.

    There are MANY stories of people losing their homes and livelihood, because they trusted Irene and her cohorts.

  • @blairadouglas

    please back it up with case numbers or names and get them on the record as well as court transcripts

    you are a strawman, "you know someone who knows someone"? i mean come on .. just shut the fuck up

  • Oh, don't rely on me and the people I've known about. Go on. Do a Google search on her. You know you wanna.

    Oh, right. That's all people from "the system" or people who can't handle being unplugged from The Matrix, right?

    Shut the fuck up? I thought you people we're all about free speech!

    :)

  • @blairadouglas

    blah blah .. a bunch of baseless claims from the strawman. you cannot expect anyone to take 3rd hand info from you as evidence of failure .. we have no idea of the circumstances and just your word that some people that someone knew failed

    you fail

  • So.............. you DIDN'T Google it and see that I share the opinion of a LOT of people. Got it.

  • @blairadouglas

    i googled and got i think you need to go back and do some studying. If you make mistakes while asserting your rights and if you fail to use every available tool and remedy then you will get eaten alive. If other failed . This woman did not fail and there is many other instances which are part of case law and on the record.

    you fail

    you will learn young padawan as I will

    Sovereign Freeman David-George: of the Smith family

  • @FreedomCanada2010

    Plaintiffs have inserted commas between their first and last names. As this punctuation serves no purpose other than obfuscation or evasion to avoid responsibility, standard punctuation is used herein to identify the three named Plaintiffs...

    Glen D. Bell et al. v. United States

    However, some cranks have gotten even more creative For example, one Canadian tax protester insists that his name is not Thomas Joseph Kennedy but Thomas-Joseph: Kennedy.

  • @RetSquid

    well .. who is better qualified to say who is what and what is what.

    i think you are missing the point of this

  • @FreedomCanada2010

    I guess that would depend on who and what you are talking about.

    The point of this is that her claims are all BS.

  • @RetSquid

    really? so she faked those cases?

  • @FreedomCanada2010

    All you have is her word that it was dismissed for the reasons she stated.

    Her whole courthouse foreclosure and 300 billion owed is total crap. Didn't she get foreclosed out of a house on another vid?

    Is the law in Canada this crazy?