Prakashanand Saraswati/Barsana Dham - Accused Guru Will Not be Allowed Back Into Temple

[annica570]

so, rather than lock up a an innocent, simple old religious man whose supporters rightfully helped him flee, the state will do what they intended: steal the ashram's money and break up their movement to condition them to be reliant on the corporate hand to feed them instead of the responsible, self sustained, disciplined motives of a hard working, genuine spiritual community.

[annica570]

the state has done this to hindu gurus for decades, because the ashrams are non-profit, do not rely on the corporate infested state for subsidies or food etc. these ashrams are SELF SUSTAINED communities, and the corporate state hates them. this is why guru after guru has been convicted of outrageous charges to break up the movements they create here and steal their money, which the county is doing in VIOLATION of the separation of church and state.

[annica570]

prakshanand is clearly and obviously innocent based on the evidence of the court's evidential cover up of the official... "evidence"...which was a testimony of the alleged lying woman claiming to have been molested. did it just magically vanish? or was it destroyed, because it could have easily been criticized to prove prakashanand's innocence? and the prosecuting atty. told the jury to, in his own words, "use your gut feeling", since the real evidence was destroyed. ?!?!?

[annica570]

anyone paying attention to any of this, beyond any texan redneck believing everything the manipulated and co opted media feeds them, knows this is baloney.

[TheArteta64]

PERVERT!!!

[Vedantka]

@TheArteta64 Your mind is petty &simply searching for excuse to spit ugly words!The ones who should be put to jail are those 3 fake victims & the whole biased jury pluscorrupted DA,her assistant & the judge.The case is worded the way to dramatize the story as there is nothing except the story told by the fake female victims,no factual evidence,no witnesses,no investigation.Verdict:life in prison for unproved indecency for 82 year old Swamiji whose whole life was spotless.Isn't it irrational?