So where can one get this sort of gizmo? Yes, I would get one and anyone who says different is full of shit... Last week some people tried kidnapping two little kids near where I live... Parents are panicking! I would want to be able to track the fuckers... And yes, I would dish out the law personally once I catch 'em too.
your crazy! mark of the beast,666,bar code. it sound like your trying to manipulate people into taking the mark. if you was not talking about the mark of the beast.you would not have mentioned it.
The only problem is can you really trust the government to not use it?? The government is also not supposed to track you calls or listen in without a warrant and stuff yet it still happens.
Uh children wont want to get something injected in them... im pretty sure most people know that. if it's before 18 really they probably wouldn't want it...
I'm well aware of that, that's why if you'll notice above I said have the option to get it at any age you want.
It reminds me of circumcision of the foreskin on the penis, babies don't get to say whether they want it or not, and their parents choose. Personally, my parents didn't force a circumcision operation on me and didn't go through with the procedure.
I am absolutely against any kind of chips in children, adults, or pets. I don't think they would necesarily be helpful if a child was lost or kidnapped. I think there is way too much room for abuse of a technology like that. We also don't know what the long-term health effects of that technology would be. Even more cancer, anyone?
I think it would be a good option for parents, assuming of course that there aren't complications from the chip. Let's see how the trials with pets work out first.
I would rather use a DNA tracker instead of a microchip. Microchips could be dangerous and can also be use by the kidnappers to find the children if they are able to some way to track the microchip signal. Knowing that only kids are wearing them also they might easiely find it and disable the chip.
idk man, im all for it, but even if its said "it wont be checked" isnt the point. the world isnt perfect, and there will allways be a time when that power will be abused, no matter which government u put in controll. the less they knwo about you the better, whether it be for safety or whatnot.
I think it's up to the parents to watch over their children, it may be hard work, but it's a parents promise to raise that child to the best of their ability.
i wouldn't mind a tracking device on my kids..but you have to know..the parent will activate that device to see where he/she is going all the time..its temptation and the knowing your kid all right...i think you should add another question in there...who will have the power to activate this devices if the parents is not allowed....public police..gov...private companies who you could purchase services? this is a good video...i like
I made a big comment here and I cannot find it. Oh well, all I am saying is that if you really love your kids then you have to learn that you cannot always proteect them and things are bound to happen in life. If they survive, then they evolve into members of society, if they don't or are mentally destroyed by it, then that is the way of life as you said about 'the real world'.
Did I say that the chip was a perfect security? No. And what do you mean by watching. It won't be a optical chip, just a transmitter so you can know where the kid is, not what it's doing. But you would know that if you herd the video. Kids are not adults and people that think that, have mental problems. The kid is not always dead. Some times the abductor wants a ransom.
And if they want a ransom, in the end that scars the kid for life. All you are doing is insulting me rather than give me proper evidence why to support it. You clearly did not understand what I had meant by watching. It was for one example I had shown and just used it in an improper way for the transmitter. It means that you are supposed to get where I am heading with my argument. You are though areguing pro chip and you should be willing to accept the criticism offered about your statement.
Ok scaring a kid for life is a possibility but is it worse than death. Which would you rather have? The child will bounce back. And very quickly depending on the age. And I don't see how I am insulting you. And what evidence? This is a hypothesis. Do you really think a group of neighbors that have nothing better to do and some cops that would rather be at home would have a better chance finding the kid than a device that will give the precise location?
Precise location???? Chips are very hard to use in the first place. Two a person can easily take them off if all of a sudden this is a trend as it would be advertised so people eventually wise up to it. Thirdly, It is actually a lot easier than it looks to find someone to look after the kids. If not neighbours, then family, if not family, you couold hire someone if you could afford it. Most people still have either their parents or other family members who have some form of time. Continued.
Fourthly, death may be terrible, but a kid scarred from that experience, even older ones won't forget something like that so easily. If they repress it, then in the end there it can affect them mentally in future. I had another point, but I just lost it. I will have to get back to that last point later.
So basically, you're telling me that death is better than being scared. Near death experiences happen all the time. As a child, I've been shot at, nearly hit by a car twice, and almost drowned. But I'm not scared of guns cars or water. Of cores every kid isn't the same, but it is easier for a child to get over dramatic experiences than adults.
I am not disagreeing there. I am saying that it is not so easy for people to get over those experiences. I have had similar experiences so I understand what you mean, but I just don't think that applies to everyone and I know that is what you had been saying so as you know I did read your post. Being held for ransom though, is worse as those guys could be pedos' or anything and won't just leave the kid intact. One day those kids are going to realise what it means.
Yeah I know what you mean. And wen the kids find out, yeah it would be terrible for them. But the only ones that would let this control them are the weak minded ones or the kids that weren't talked to 1 on 1 with. I mean, during my last day of my college quarter, I got held up at gun point in a ally at 1 in the morning. I'd still walk down that ally. and I'm 20. I guess I'm just crazy that way. And I know that doesn't apply to everyone but I like to think people won't let fear control them.
I agree, I would like to think people could be stronger, but as human beings unfortunately, we are unpredictable. I think though that a kid needs their parents, but their parents have to understand that if they know everything their child does, it does not allow for a child and a parent to respect eachother as time goes on. I know this as having known many families inside mine and and other families where it does affect how the child perceives the parent. Children can be quite unpredictable.
I see. I don't understand that because in my family, the only ones that get respect are the adults. The kids are to be obedient or else. Kinda like a military. We dare not talk back to a adult when we were kids.
Not a bad idea. Would cut down on the kid napping and killings. It can always be removed, and as long as the parnet has control when it's activated it might work. Of course others could use it to do evil as well if they figured it out. You got to be carefull with that kinda things.
I don't know about evil, but there are things that are bad that can happen from this. Parents need to interact with their child and stay or at least make sure the child is with someone they know and are safe with. A transmitter just means that the parent is gonna panic more when there could be even a slight problem and the child doesn't learn. Children that are kidnapped are the ones that don't have anyone there with them. Parents no matter how busy should be able to watch their child come home.
By evil I mean as in a parnet knowing all the time where there kid is at. That can lead to a parnet beating there kid for not being where they said to to be. Even worse some pedo or killer hacks the system and gets it. Could turn out pretty bad.
It is impossible for a parent to watch a kid every second of every day. And being a uncle means nothing. There is no such thing as perfect security. I don't know what kind of fantasy world you live in, but the real world is dangerous. If both parents work, they need to have someone watch the kid will they work to support the kid. What if they are sleeping in their house and someone breaks in a takes the kid? What then?
Then the kid is probably dead if they are kidnapped. You can always have baby cams because at least that isn't always watching them. You are mocking me when I propose reasonable solutions. The real world is dangerous but that is life and bad things happen and it can be hard to stop. Why do you think people say tough luck??!! Of course there is no perfect security and that is my point about the chip even more. You just argued your own point.
I don't think they should. Now, you are gonna have to excuse me as my computer is muted so I cannot hear anything, but I am sure you made valid points. I just do not believe however that it is the required step to take.
Well many kids act like animal. but that's not the case. 1,000s of kids go missing each year and I bet those parents wish they had some sort of transmitter. If you are a parent, you are probably one of those "fun parents" that let your kids do whatever they want. Their is no reason kids shouldn't have something like that and then have it removed when they turn 18.
I am not a parent, but I am an uncle and I believe that the best way to look after your kids is to watch them yourself. If they play with their friends, you be there with them. If you are a single parent, then it might be harder but they have managed to raise healthy children. I have seen parenting as I live next to my brother. He has not used a transmitter and he runs with his kids and does everything with them even though he works very hard. It is up to parents, not transmitters.
So where can one get this sort of gizmo? Yes, I would get one and anyone who says different is full of shit... Last week some people tried kidnapping two little kids near where I live... Parents are panicking! I would want to be able to track the fuckers... And yes, I would dish out the law personally once I catch 'em too.
Ghostninjaattack 1 month ago
Anyone rember this as a joke advert from GTA?
ldmonahan1 6 months ago
Maybe if they did it then offered to remove it at the age of 18 or 21
reverandrav 6 months ago
your crazy! mark of the beast,666,bar code. it sound like your trying to manipulate people into taking the mark. if you was not talking about the mark of the beast.you would not have mentioned it.
raymacked 10 months ago
its wrong nuff said big bother
AL2dope1 1 year ago
wow no one on this page makes any sense keep on drinkin that big gulp
surrenderyourflesh 1 year ago
GOod...
expricornis 1 year ago
The only problem is can you really trust the government to not use it?? The government is also not supposed to track you calls or listen in without a warrant and stuff yet it still happens.
killa81212 1 year ago
this kind of tracking devices leads to the mark of the beast !! Its geting us used to the idea!!!
Placentiaautosupply 1 year ago
uh, uh... I don't think so.
trickywillet 1 year ago
SKYNET!!!!!!!!
DeathstarGalactica 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What should happen to a sick and twisted person who molests a three year old child? The answers on my channel to this will shock you!
The video is called "Molester molests 3 year old infant"
Every day I get some of the most interesting comments. What do you think should happen to the guy who did this to this three year old infant?
WARNING: some of the comments are extremely graphic in nature and may not be suitable for everyone. This is a VERY heated and passionate topic.
NewsChat 2 years ago
under those conditions only yes:
activated only when missing or kidnapped, etc.
only you and your closest family member/guardian, etc have access to it personally, and know one else knows about it.
have the option to get it at any age you want, not just birth. And have the option to get it any where on your body or in your body.
bomtenho 2 years ago
Uh children wont want to get something injected in them... im pretty sure most people know that. if it's before 18 really they probably wouldn't want it...
dragon71422 2 years ago
I'm well aware of that, that's why if you'll notice above I said have the option to get it at any age you want.
It reminds me of circumcision of the foreskin on the penis, babies don't get to say whether they want it or not, and their parents choose. Personally, my parents didn't force a circumcision operation on me and didn't go through with the procedure.
bomtenho 2 years ago
Were it to be used for said purpose only, I say yes. But I think we all know better.
chrometanned 2 years ago
I am absolutely against any kind of chips in children, adults, or pets. I don't think they would necesarily be helpful if a child was lost or kidnapped. I think there is way too much room for abuse of a technology like that. We also don't know what the long-term health effects of that technology would be. Even more cancer, anyone?
rootsheal 2 years ago
you trust corpatism too much
imaginepeace63 2 years ago
its not spelled like that *corporatism* but i do agree with u.
I am against tracking devices....
rlw251362008 2 years ago
Comment removed
imaginepeace63 2 years ago
great job with the green screen
imaginepeace63 2 years ago
I think it would be a good option for parents, assuming of course that there aren't complications from the chip. Let's see how the trials with pets work out first.
jloiterer 2 years ago
I would rather use a DNA tracker instead of a microchip. Microchips could be dangerous and can also be use by the kidnappers to find the children if they are able to some way to track the microchip signal. Knowing that only kids are wearing them also they might easiely find it and disable the chip.
MrTheblackshinobi 2 years ago
not in a million years would i ever chip my child nor my pet. it's bad enough the chips are in cellphones.
docdrew87 2 years ago
I meant that when children are older there should be more of an understanding between the two.
captainsunder009 2 years ago
damn where you been at bro ? they got the chips in dogs and cats.
RODNEY383 2 years ago
arent their conspiracy theorist who already beleive the govmt is doing this to kids already?
BigVOLdaddy 2 years ago
idk man, im all for it, but even if its said "it wont be checked" isnt the point. the world isnt perfect, and there will allways be a time when that power will be abused, no matter which government u put in controll. the less they knwo about you the better, whether it be for safety or whatnot.
pillarmusicrocks 2 years ago
Too many positives and negatives...I think we should just leave it alone lol.
revilolee 2 years ago
where the hell have u been man lol. been a while.
pillarmusicrocks 2 years ago
I think it's up to the parents to watch over their children, it may be hard work, but it's a parents promise to raise that child to the best of their ability.
DrGnockerz 2 years ago 2
i wouldn't mind a tracking device on my kids..but you have to know..the parent will activate that device to see where he/she is going all the time..its temptation and the knowing your kid all right...i think you should add another question in there...who will have the power to activate this devices if the parents is not allowed....public police..gov...private companies who you could purchase services? this is a good video...i like
ginrue 2 years ago
Im no parent (not yet), but I dont think its a necessary thing to do.
KazeKiriStudios 2 years ago
I made a big comment here and I cannot find it. Oh well, all I am saying is that if you really love your kids then you have to learn that you cannot always proteect them and things are bound to happen in life. If they survive, then they evolve into members of society, if they don't or are mentally destroyed by it, then that is the way of life as you said about 'the real world'.
captainsunder009 2 years ago
Did I say that the chip was a perfect security? No. And what do you mean by watching. It won't be a optical chip, just a transmitter so you can know where the kid is, not what it's doing. But you would know that if you herd the video. Kids are not adults and people that think that, have mental problems. The kid is not always dead. Some times the abductor wants a ransom.
DionLaurent1 2 years ago
And if they want a ransom, in the end that scars the kid for life. All you are doing is insulting me rather than give me proper evidence why to support it. You clearly did not understand what I had meant by watching. It was for one example I had shown and just used it in an improper way for the transmitter. It means that you are supposed to get where I am heading with my argument. You are though areguing pro chip and you should be willing to accept the criticism offered about your statement.
captainsunder009 2 years ago
Ok scaring a kid for life is a possibility but is it worse than death. Which would you rather have? The child will bounce back. And very quickly depending on the age. And I don't see how I am insulting you. And what evidence? This is a hypothesis. Do you really think a group of neighbors that have nothing better to do and some cops that would rather be at home would have a better chance finding the kid than a device that will give the precise location?
DionLaurent1 2 years ago
Precise location???? Chips are very hard to use in the first place. Two a person can easily take them off if all of a sudden this is a trend as it would be advertised so people eventually wise up to it. Thirdly, It is actually a lot easier than it looks to find someone to look after the kids. If not neighbours, then family, if not family, you couold hire someone if you could afford it. Most people still have either their parents or other family members who have some form of time. Continued.
captainsunder009 2 years ago
Fourthly, death may be terrible, but a kid scarred from that experience, even older ones won't forget something like that so easily. If they repress it, then in the end there it can affect them mentally in future. I had another point, but I just lost it. I will have to get back to that last point later.
captainsunder009 2 years ago
So basically, you're telling me that death is better than being scared. Near death experiences happen all the time. As a child, I've been shot at, nearly hit by a car twice, and almost drowned. But I'm not scared of guns cars or water. Of cores every kid isn't the same, but it is easier for a child to get over dramatic experiences than adults.
DionLaurent1 2 years ago
I am not disagreeing there. I am saying that it is not so easy for people to get over those experiences. I have had similar experiences so I understand what you mean, but I just don't think that applies to everyone and I know that is what you had been saying so as you know I did read your post. Being held for ransom though, is worse as those guys could be pedos' or anything and won't just leave the kid intact. One day those kids are going to realise what it means.
captainsunder009 2 years ago
Yeah I know what you mean. And wen the kids find out, yeah it would be terrible for them. But the only ones that would let this control them are the weak minded ones or the kids that weren't talked to 1 on 1 with. I mean, during my last day of my college quarter, I got held up at gun point in a ally at 1 in the morning. I'd still walk down that ally. and I'm 20. I guess I'm just crazy that way. And I know that doesn't apply to everyone but I like to think people won't let fear control them.
DionLaurent1 2 years ago
I agree, I would like to think people could be stronger, but as human beings unfortunately, we are unpredictable. I think though that a kid needs their parents, but their parents have to understand that if they know everything their child does, it does not allow for a child and a parent to respect eachother as time goes on. I know this as having known many families inside mine and and other families where it does affect how the child perceives the parent. Children can be quite unpredictable.
captainsunder009 2 years ago
I see. I don't understand that because in my family, the only ones that get respect are the adults. The kids are to be obedient or else. Kinda like a military. We dare not talk back to a adult when we were kids.
DionLaurent1 2 years ago
Wow this must be a very interesting and controversial subject I appreciate all the comments posted
4DaBigTime 2 years ago
@4DaBigTime How much did someone pay you to present this Bullshit
surrenderyourflesh 1 year ago
hell no, i believe that those chips r da mark of da beast(666)
DaMexicanZFighter 2 years ago
Not a bad idea. Would cut down on the kid napping and killings. It can always be removed, and as long as the parnet has control when it's activated it might work. Of course others could use it to do evil as well if they figured it out. You got to be carefull with that kinda things.
theewall200 2 years ago
I don't know about evil, but there are things that are bad that can happen from this. Parents need to interact with their child and stay or at least make sure the child is with someone they know and are safe with. A transmitter just means that the parent is gonna panic more when there could be even a slight problem and the child doesn't learn. Children that are kidnapped are the ones that don't have anyone there with them. Parents no matter how busy should be able to watch their child come home.
captainsunder009 2 years ago
By evil I mean as in a parnet knowing all the time where there kid is at. That can lead to a parnet beating there kid for not being where they said to to be. Even worse some pedo or killer hacks the system and gets it. Could turn out pretty bad.
theewall200 2 years ago
kids don't have privacy. Put that chip in them. Better safe than sorry.
DionLaurent1 2 years ago
NO NO NO NO NO!!!!!!!!
DaGatorBoy24 2 years ago
Kids are still humans and it is as if we are treating them like animals if we do.
captainsunder009 2 years ago
It is impossible for a parent to watch a kid every second of every day. And being a uncle means nothing. There is no such thing as perfect security. I don't know what kind of fantasy world you live in, but the real world is dangerous. If both parents work, they need to have someone watch the kid will they work to support the kid. What if they are sleeping in their house and someone breaks in a takes the kid? What then?
DionLaurent1 2 years ago
Then the kid is probably dead if they are kidnapped. You can always have baby cams because at least that isn't always watching them. You are mocking me when I propose reasonable solutions. The real world is dangerous but that is life and bad things happen and it can be hard to stop. Why do you think people say tough luck??!! Of course there is no perfect security and that is my point about the chip even more. You just argued your own point.
captainsunder009 2 years ago
I don't think they should. Now, you are gonna have to excuse me as my computer is muted so I cannot hear anything, but I am sure you made valid points. I just do not believe however that it is the required step to take.
captainsunder009 2 years ago
Well many kids act like animal. but that's not the case. 1,000s of kids go missing each year and I bet those parents wish they had some sort of transmitter. If you are a parent, you are probably one of those "fun parents" that let your kids do whatever they want. Their is no reason kids shouldn't have something like that and then have it removed when they turn 18.
DionLaurent1 2 years ago
I am not a parent, but I am an uncle and I believe that the best way to look after your kids is to watch them yourself. If they play with their friends, you be there with them. If you are a single parent, then it might be harder but they have managed to raise healthy children. I have seen parenting as I live next to my brother. He has not used a transmitter and he runs with his kids and does everything with them even though he works very hard. It is up to parents, not transmitters.
captainsunder009 2 years ago