Added: 4 years ago
From: AntonBatey
Views: 1,877
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (50)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The problem with Mr. Batey's worldview is that he can't account for objective reality; his worldview must exist in an evidentary vacuum to remain "valid." However, the Biblical Christian worldview accounts for reality, and allows for induction whereas the atheistic worldview doesn't.

  • @brown547

    Our views are equally as subjective and objective. He just does not say so.

  • I love how Anton danced around the first question. He would not tell Mr.Cook what his criteria for something being evidence / proof was. Now he either did this to avoid having that criteria met, having that criteria proven to be inconsistent when applied to bible, or he may very well not understand that there must be an agreed upon definition/ standard in order for burden of proof to be met. I'm still trying to figure out why He posted these as if he came out looking good. Anton you got spanked.

  • @all4Hisgloryalone

    I did explain why, to which I got no response. The standards are different because the claims are different. When someone claims a supernatural event occurs, it’s logical to demand more, almost “supernatural” proof, unlike a natural claim such as George Washing crossing the Delaware. When I brought that up, the topic was switched. You know I didn’t get “spanked”, so don’t even go there.

  • @all4Hisgloryalone

    Furthermore, contemporaneous citations are provided for one claim, but not the other.

  • go to kemit

  • i gotta say. he defeated you in most of this argument. prety good.

  • @RESIDENTRYAN

    Hmm. You're pretty much the only person to ever hear it to think so. How do you figure that he did? All I remember was him changing the subject and not answering my questions.

  • @AntonBatey i posted my reply to this on your other comment. in case ur interested.

  • @AntonBatey He answered your questions thoroughly & stayed on subject. U gave little 2 no real consideration 2 any of his answers,which were well thought out & accurately represented the text of scripture. U offered no refutation U just made statements. U jumped all over in subjects. No matter how well he answered U, U will continue to say he DID NOT because the answer he gave is not what U want 2 hear. Your standard of proof is subjective therefore there is no facts he can offer 2 satisfy U.

  • @all4Hisgloryalone

    No he didn’t. He changed the subject numerous times and didn’t answer my question, namely on what gives Jesus more credibility than the other gods. Any answer he tried to give I shut it down with ease.

  • very very interesting debate anton am finding your videos amazing working my way threw them all.

  • I Bealive in Christ, though, its Faith! You are right when u say that Christians are all into faith, i truly bealive in my heart that there is God, and i personally think that u wouldnt bealive in Jesus even if he hits u in the head... I think it was a very interesting debate...if wed present proofs, ull just say theyre fake...so this is an eternal debate... Regards antone. take care buddy

  • Thanks for the comment, brother.

  • whether it be your 2pac videos or this video I always appreciate listening to your debates.

    You are very intelligent and ALWAYS have great points, I truly enjoy listening to you.

    Cheers, and keep doing what you are doing Anton

  • Pastor Cook is simply dancing around(play games)!

  • The Atheist NEVER confirmed scripture!! Smooth move Pastor. However, not smooth enough!

  • He confirmed human thought processes, that obviously went into the book.

    Also Cook said earlier that because the bible talks about the beginning of the universe that means nothing can predate the bible. That is an absurd statement

  • Your all three and you don't even know it my friend ... Yet your far better off then Pastor cook ..... here is an idea watch the cook vs Bernard debate ... it wont change you but you'll have a better idea what the truth is that your opposing here

  • lol, I can't tell if you're being serious or not.

  • Any man who denys there is a God is either a Liar a fool or an agent of the devil which are you Mr. Anton? All nature cry's out that there is something more then we can see or touch. The very scab system in our blood is an irreconcilable prof of divine design. The chance that it could evolve on it's own are so astronomical I am not even going to try to relate them because you will call me a liar and never look it up yourself . So if your not a fool your a liar or worse take your pick

  • It's silly to call someone in the year 2009 who does NOT believe in goofy tales about a spook god a "fool".

    I'm not a "liar", because there is nothing to lie about.

    And I'm not an "agent of the devil" because the devil is make believe too.

    lol

  • Christians waste there time trying to prove to people that there is a GOD while the world continues to suffer do to there lack of understanding of the dispositions of that GOD. Christians call themselves "vessels", but have no clue what that means. A vessel means conduit or tube. In order to be a channel for spiritual light(love), you have to take on(become) the aspects of the creator, not worship it.

    I see your going against your own advice , by arguing scabs and blood, which is "carnal".

  • I'm pretty sure your going to convince a lot of people to come to your Christ by calling them "agents of the devil". Christians are the ones who created atheist. Without theism (belief in a higher GOD), there wouldn't be "a" theism (non belief in a higher GOD). Also, one can be a liar and not know they are liars, including you and I. Telling a purposeful lie is different than teaching what you don't know is a lie. It still makes you a liar, but in a different context.

  • Man cannot believe in God unless he gives you the gift of belief,Jesus said" I have chosen you,you did not choose me"This is because we are dead in our sins and Jesus must make us alive in Himself through the Holy Spirit.

  • The problem on this earth isn't a non belief in GOD, it's a lack of responsibilty by humanity to seek the GOD (genetics) within them to activate the characteristics necassary for the redemption(healing) of the world. I don't even know Anton Batey, but I'm distressed that you call him an agent of the devil, which doesn't line up with the bible. Anti-Christ personality would be one that puts on the mask of Christ, but doesn't operate in it. Christianity would be where the devil is hiding.

  • "The very scab system in our blood is an irreconcilable prof of divine design. The chance that it could evolve on it's own are so astronomical I am not even going to try to relate them because you will call me a liar and never look it up yourself"

    Scabs are proof of god?.Right, now I have heard everything!!.

    Do you like fish?How about Puffer fish?Go and check out their blood clotting system, and get back to me.The scab system is very evolvable. Not all parts need to be present for it to work.

  • lol

    The "scabs are proof for god" made me laugh too.

  • Gene cook feels he speaks for all Christianity. He has no chance in changing your opinion neither do any of these children posting here. In fact every time they try to argue with you it only makes you feel stronger in your belief .... fools as foolish as you yourself Anton . I tell every Christan that see this you cant argue spirituality with history with facts or anything carnal ..... "for we war not with flesh and blood but with principality and powers of darkness"

  • No need to call me a "fool", sir.

  • "I tell every Christan that see this you cant argue spirituality with history with facts or anything carnal"

    Everything thing Christianity is about is arguing facts and carnal history. They can't seem to get past the "carnal" Jesus on the cross, or idolatry of the physical, "carnal" man or arguing the facts and "carnal" events in th bible. 95% of Christians don't even undersatnd the bible anyway. They follow some set morals and put the mask of Christianity on. Spiritual doesn't = Christian.

  • ANTON BATEY is the sh it so all you haters grow a brain and fu ck off

  • Read the "Case for Christ" by Lee Strobel instead of listening to this crap from mut.

  • Did you just call me a mut?

    And your name, I Will Kill Your Ass Fool, is the one defending Christianity? You're a joke.

    Also, how does Pilate's existance confirm the entire Bible?

  • Congradulations, ya racist scumbag. Go fuck yourself.

    If I make up a story saying that a flying spaghetti monster existed in Chicago when Barack Obama was President, if people found that story 2,000 years from now, would the fact that Chicago is a real place and Obama being a real person mean that a real flying shaghetti monster existed? No, didn't think so, you racist piece of shit.

  • You do what anyone does who doesn't have the intellectual capacity of a potato you will simply cite a book without defending it, as if mentioning a book advances your argument. I can also cite books that refute that book, such as Robert Price's books. So on what page in "The Case For Christ" proves the validity of the Bible.

    Tell me, defender of Jesus - Iwillkillyourassfool.

    Idiot.

  • great book

  • Anton, great interview. I enjoyed it. It seems Gene likes to dodge your challenges. He believes in ancient superstition. He states he KNOWS that god exists, yet also claims he has FAITH that god exists (faith is required by the bible). Sounds inconsistent to me.

  • Nobody talks so constantly about God as those who insist that there is no God. lol

  • Using your own "logic", I think it's you who is the atheist. Your pseudo psychology can easily be applied to you, the poor theist adult who believes in talking snakes, who is despirate to try to find reason and logic against such absurd, irrational beliefs.

  • Paradoxically, the funnier it seems, the more serious it becomes.

  • lol yeah.

  • God Almighty stands on trial for NO ONE! You either submit your will to the Lordship of Christ and receive life evermore through His marvelous grace, or you spit in the Son of God's face and be mercilessly condemned to the eternally burning garbage heap called Hell for everlasting to everlasting.

    Kiss the Son, lest He be angry, And you perish in the way, When His wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all those who put their trust in Him.

    Ps. 2:12

  • lol is your comment a joke?

  • The fool has said in his heart,There is no God.

    Ps. 14:1

    A wicked and adulterous generation seeks after a sign, and no sign shall be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah.

    Matt 16:4

    And this is the condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.

    John 3:19

    He who is of God hears Gods words; therefore you do not hear, because you are not of God.

    John 8:47

  • For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse...

    Ro 1:18-20

  • Anton Batey just beat this guys ass.

  • Mr. Cook is saying you have to buy the story in order for the "holy spirit" to come. An omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscience being can't communicate directly to you. This moron is saying questioning the the bible, is rejecting it. What a moron.

  • In order for the holy spirit to manifest in your life you must be saved. Being saved involves believing in Christ. Got it? Good.

  • There is no such thing as ghosts, dumbass.

  • In other words it is all true once you first assume its all true. Real intelligent way to go about proving things there mate.

  • point of the matter anton, is that you have already formed your opinions so even if someone did present you with evidence that the bible and Jesus Christ is real you would still reject it because you have your own belief system.

  • I'm open to evidence. I always am, on any subject. I think it's totally possible that Jesus existed. But nobody can prove he existed utilizing contemporaneous historians at the time...and there were many. Pastor Cook couldn't (I shot down everything he said, which is why he changed the subject), and you can't either.

  • Anton: You are right -- no one can prove by contempory methods that Jesus existed.

    I try to keep Christ simple -- the bliss that comes from conscious-sleep, prayer, meditation and energization exercise is "proof" that a purer form of consciousness exists in this frame. I've met people that have deeper experiences than me (far deeper) and they have spelled out the experiences I'll have as I advance and so far all have come true. Religions words are to inspire "looking."

    Follow bliss

  • Pontius Pilate Inscription. It was in 1961 that the first archaeological find was made with reference to Pontius Pilate. ( the person who put Jesus to death) This was a stone slab located at Caesarea, which bore in Latin the name of Pontius Pilate. Go read a book and get your nose out of anton's booty.

  • I might have taken offense by your ignorant post but the language and your username took care of that -- thanks for exposing yourself.

    Good Times

  • What people don't understand is that in 70 A.D., the Romans invaded and destroyed Jerusalem and most of Israel, slaughtering its inhabitants. Entire cities were literally burned to the ground! We should not be surprised, then, if much evidence of Jesus' existence was destroyed. Many of the eye-witnesses of Jesus would have been killed. These facts likely limited the amount of surviving eyewitness testimony of Jesus.

  • Too bad you don't have a shred of evidence of that statement.

  • how does being a christian make your "theory" any better then other religions and beliefs? Any other religions think the same thing you do, except about their own belief, so what make your theory any more creditable?

    thats what i would have asked him,

    then he would of actually just say well god and the bible told me, like he has done up to this point that i have watched/listened actually.

  • "you always appeal to the bible". you caught him there

  • I think I would have answered the question about what evidence do you want a little differenly.

    Basically I would not bias the experiment by pre-supposing what the evidence will be. This would be close minded as you are therefore pre-rejecting all the evidence that doesnt fit my definition.

    I am willing and happy to consider ALL evidence put before me.

  • is the devil actually mentioned in the bible?

  • PINK UNICORNS KICK ASS

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more