IT GETS WORSE: THESE LOSERS START ASKING QUESTIONS LIKE: "WELL, WHY DID YOU SWING LIKE THAT? SHOULDN'T YOU BE PLANNING TO SWING THAT SHOT OVER HERE? WHY DID YOU CHOOSE TO PUT IT?"
THERE IS NO LICENSING OR SKILL REQUIRED TO BE A "journalist". YOU'RE A LOSER WHO READS TELEPROMTPERS AND SOMETIMES A RATFACE LIKE UGLY erin burnett WHO IS EXACTLY LIKE THE ANALOGY I JUST ILLUSTRATED
WHAT'S WORSE IS SHE'D BE 'BELOW AVERAGE' IF U RANKED THE CHARLATANS ON cnbs
IT'S LIKE A LOSER TELEPROMPTER READER FOR SPORTS, WHO NEVER SWUNG A GOLF CLUB, NEVER PLAYED GOLF, AND IS IN FACT HIHGLY OUT OF SHAPE SITTING ON A CHAIR WITH A SUIT AND TIE OR BLOUSE/SKIRT ASKING QUESTIONS (I ASK, YOU ANSWER; GOT IT!?) TO GOLF PLAYERS
AND ALL OF A SUDDEN, THE LOSER TELEPROMTPER RAEDER ACTS/TALKS LIKE HE/SHE IS TIGER WOODS AND A PRO-GOLFER. YOU READ TELEPROMTPERS AND ASK QUESTIONS. THAT IS WHA
THAT 7PM TIMESLOT HAS BEEN A REVOLVING DOOR FOR YEARS NOW
WHEN YOU PUT UGLY PPL LIKWE erin burnett TO READ TELEPROMTPERS, PPL DONT WATCH AND FLIP THE CHANNEL. IT'S THAT SIMPLE. THIS UGLY RATFACE CHARLATAN DOESN'T MAKE THE CUT FOR 'ATTRACTIVE TELEPROMTEPR READERS' (DESPITE ALL THAT MAKEUP WHICH MEANS I DONT EVEN WANNA KNOW WHAT THE RAT LOOKS LIKE W/O MAKEUP)
erin burnett is not a "sell out" she was never a legitimate journalist. she has spent her whole career climbing as hard as she could. she's marrying rich, she met her boss in a hot tub, her career is based on looking pretty and shilling for the banks
They just keep doing it to us. Remember Bushpig senior and the savings and loan scandal? Now they want us to return to the good old days of the depression. They want to steal your last nickel your penny is already worthless. No money for housing or healthcare or social security or education but plenty for bailouts and war. Erin go b.r.a., Back to Real America where there is no free lunch for wall street criminals, where fraud is still a crime.
there's all kinds of whores. you don't necessarily have to give up the pussy. in fact prostitution of the body doesn't pay at all compared to soul whoring. And Erin's like the Mae West of the new intellectual/ethical hooker vanguard.
Everyone go to: watch?v=RCiAG7LF7Q4 if you want to see how ERIN BURNETT wishes to do some "honest reporting" on the Occupy Wall Street movement. It is a perfect example of what is wrong with mainstream media when it comes to bias.
Erin research "Federal Reserve audited" thats why the protestors are protesting dumb bitch... Anyone who looks down upon the protestors seriously research
"FEDERAL RESERVE AUDITED"
They gave 16 trillion of OUR MONEY to foreign banks, corps OVERSEAS!!!!!!! while our country fell and continues to fall apart. The reason people question the protestors is because Mainstream doesn't and won't report the protest or the reason.. The corps run the media and don't want to expose their banker buddies.
Erin Burnett is a little snake. She is a former employee of Goldman Sachs. She is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Finally, she is engaged to a banker from Citigroup. She is one of the most biased "journalists" ever.
I expect the wrath of the many here, but the reductiveness here is indicative of the ugliness of mob mentality. Erin is bright and thoughtful. Wall Street is not monolithic. Heck, there is no "Wall Street", there are many people involved in many types of markets doing entirely different types of businesses. There is no test for morality, and people across that spectrum are as represented in markets as in any business. It just happens to be where the money moves.
@MetaIhead89 It is, isn't it? Yet your flip response, angry as you are entitled to be, is empty. Neither working in markets, nor reporting about them, is inherently immoral. You have a huge mob behind you, but it's your responsibility alone to be moral and assess others' character and morality.
@fairalways nobody is buying your white knight crap about Burnett. The proof is out and the verdict is in. If you know her, tell her that life's getting ready to change.
@Annihilate3275 Anger is fine, but you'll have problems in marriage arguing "nobody" (much less "everybody", "always","never",or any other polarizing exaggeration). Your next line about "the proof being out" is another empty statement. Unfortunately, the proof is NOT out, which is why there are folks walking who should be in jail. "The verdict is in" implies that you've stepped over the line from angry plaintiff to Salem Witch hunting. I don't know her. I know reduction. Big problem.
@fairalways your pseudo-rationalizing is only fueling the fire. Nobody here is with you because they have seen what this shill, Erin Burnett, is about. All of your yapping and gibberish is simply confirming that you're biased and full of crap. Type her name into the search bar and see all the comments lately about her on ANY video. Accept it because yapping and gibberish to distract and persuade people is accomplishing the exact opposite of your intentions. Have a nice day.
@Annihilate3275 Mobs fuel their own fire. It wouldn't matter what I post if it didn't tow your line. Again with your "nobody". If you're in the company of such dogmatists, it may help you to feel empowered, but it doesn't change immoral and/or ignorant assumptions.
I don't hold mobs, nor YT responders to a very high standard. My only intention is to be my own voice; I'm sure of your gibberish, well intentioned as you believe. So rage; it's ultimately self-involved if not survival instinct.
@Annihilate3275 PS You're Canadian? Lots of oil field jobs in Canada. Well paying. You seem to have me confused with someone who doesn't understand the anger of many. There can be a useful point to the Wall Street protests; but I am certain of the low bar of understanding of most people anywhere, on any side of the many issues. Are you down on Wall Street right now? I'm a New Yorker.
@fairalways PS. Nice to see you've resorted to straw man retorts when it's clear you've failed in your attempt make any valid points to support your opinions. I think you know you've failed but your childish stubbornness to "get the last word" is only causing more people to go against you. Good job. Perhaps one day you'll learn that being obsessed with getting the last word in a losing argument only serves to defeat your original purpose. Have a nice Sunday arguing w/ more and more people.
@Annihilate3275 I'm being specific. Please point out what I've stated which is "straw man". I find that to be an overused and misused YT phrase. Being specific is different than stubborn. If you wish to move me from my point, address my point.
But seeing as it is you who is arguing (if not being polemic) while I'm discussing, I may respond until I understand either what lies beneath your anger.
@fairalways as far as your strawman use, here you go: "Anger is fine, but you'll have problems in marriage arguing "nobody" (much less "everybody", "always","never",or any other polarizing exaggeration)" You're steering the topic away from Burnett's behavior to mine by implying I exaggerate and will have problems in marriage. Also, this is ironic since you chose the name "ALWAYSfair," which, according to you, is a polarizing exaggeration.
@Annihilate3275 I addressed this video, and in this video what she said was fair. You drew the topic to yourself with your unmeasured response. One could argue that you made the straw man when you directed the issue to ad hominem about Burnett and not her words in this video. As far as my name, you missed my purposeful irony. My point stands. Your marriage may be fine; your behavior is an issue. That is not, as you state, ad hominem.
@fairalways "As far as my name, you missed my purposeful irony." So this statement basically reveals that you're willfully biased. Thank you making my point. Any conversation after that revelation is excessive and pointless because you just exposed where you're coming from. Have a nice day.
@Annihilate3275 You seem to have a propensity to exaggerate. I aim for fairness. You clearly don't. I am fairly sure that my pointing out your use of "nobody" and other overstatements will be revisited by you someday. It would be nice if I had something to learn from you.
@fairalways lol one more thing (sorry there's so many things to point out with you). Do you realize how many of your posts have at least one sentence that has to reassure you and your audience that you're fair? If you have to keep saying you possess some kind of virtue over and over again, it looks like you actually doubt what you're saying in the first place. "If I keep saying it over and over, maybe everyone will believe it!" Fraud.
@Annihilate3275 Again, the difference between "acting fraudulently" (which I haven't) and "fraud" is ad hominem. Yes, fairness is the measurement of morality worth using in most YT exchanges. I'm sure the content of my words is more important than which words I use. I'm not your enemy; your anger is misplaced. Your insistent aggressive stance will also likely be a sticking point in any close relationship like marriage. Erin Burnett is larger than one report. As are you and I.
@fairalways My aggression is towards your refusal to hold a "journalist" to task for biased reporting, which in turn causes you to look biased as well. If you feel that her prior reporting somehow erases her OWS piece, then you are clearly entitled to that opinion. You just need to realize that the vast majority of people regarding this issue do not agree with you. Also, your claim that my argument with you somehow reflects on my marriage shows the depths you'll sink to to grasp at straws.
@Annihilate3275 I am all for holding a journalist to task. I think Mr, Mankiewicz did a good job. As far as "a vast majority of people" not agreeing with me, I'm not sure that's true. But if it is true, it's secondary.
@fairalways "PS no need to apologize" haha very cute. Behind every passive aggressive demeanor is an angry and resentful person. With the amount of time you've spent arguing, a significant amount of time and energy has been used. Trying to reassure the audience that you have "thick skin" reflects a desire for how you want to be perceived, not how you really feel. Regardless, nothing else is being accomplished, so I will let you have the last word. That seems to be your main goal anyway.
@Annihilate3275 Yes, I can see who has shown aggression here. Have I displayed either? I can do this easily; I work from home. I enjoy this; I'm good at it. You're correct about not needing to put my skin on display; although perception seems to be all we have on YT. Not like we know each other.
The "last word" thing? Back atcha. It would be honest if you said "OUR" main goal.
@Annihilate3275 PS So I'm understood, When I say "there are people walking who should be in jail", I mean specific, still largely publicly unidentified people in banks, hedge funds, ratings agencies, mortgage issuers and packagers; and specific market participants. If you wish your anger to have more power, do the detective work; find the point where said people crossed the line from aggressive business to immoral destruction. I want them doing hard time. You'll hurt innocent with your flailing.
@fairalways PS So I'm understood: The explosive hate (and growing) for Burnett is because of her slanderous, biased, and obnoxious reporting on the Occupy Wallstreet events. If you haven't seen it, then I suggest you watch it to get a better grasp of the situation. Perhaps if you had acknowledged that, then your statements would have received some respect. So again, based on her recent reporting footage, the proof IS out and the verdict IS in, whether you like it or not.
@Annihilate3275 Perhaps you can direct me to where I might find such reporting. I didn't see it here nor the one or two other YT videos I've watched. I haven't watched her on CNN, but I watched every day without fail on CNBC. That is what is addressed on this video. I'm not asking for respect by the way, I'm just asking for you to address direct points. So far you've responded with counterproductive, vague, yet understandable anger.
@fairalways as far as needing my help to find the YT videos, they're on the first page if you simply type her name. If you had an ounce of resourcefulness, you would have found them instead of asking for directions.
@Annihilate3275 Again, pick one video, and respond specifically to her specific statements. What are your specific grievances, what is it that drives you to OWS (are you there?), and point out a video in which Ms. Burnett has misunderstood you.
@fairalways bottom line. Watch the recent Burnett videos on her comments/reporting regarding OWS. This is the source of all the recent ire towards her. Until you analyze this catalyst, your viewpoint is entirely uneducated and ignorant. If you can't find them (they're on first page if you type her name), then that lack of resourcefulness is most likely not limited to simply looking for videos on youtube.
@Annihilate3275 I am responding to this video. As far as CNBC goes, the points Cenk made aren't valid. You have made no specific reference, other than you are angry. Calling me uneducated and ignorant flies in the face of my clarity. So far, I have yet to hear any insight from you to direct me to your logic. Why don't you make a specific reference to one specific YT video.
@fairalways since you need specific directions on how to find the footage even after I told you that plenty were on the first page when you search her name, here you go watch?v=SRGns6LaJgA. That's the show in its purest form.
@Annihilate3275 The only other reference on YT, edited by TYT, is Burnett's new show. Ben Mankiewicz prefaces his critique of Burnett's off-base report saying, I really like Erin Burnett. She got the protest wrong, but she's usually a pretty good reporter. He knows that she knows. That sounds fair. Cenk, on the other hand, obviously didn't watch CNBC a whole lot (for Burnett surprised cynical market watchers like myself with her insight and even-handedness), and seems a bit misogynistic.
@fairalways ok now that you've seen the footage of her recent reporting on OWS, we can understand each other much better. This is footage that has caused so much ire towards her as of late. It's an intentional misrepresentation of the situation and the participants involved. TYT reporting points it out adequately. I realize that you're a fan of her, so you may be a bit biased regarding the situation. Bottom line, this is a major turning point and she is trying to misrepresent it.
@Annihilate3275 I believe it is a turning point. Don't waste time fretting about Burnett. She's not elemental. Alan Grayson seems to be the clearest voice so far.
@fairalways she represents business reporting on one of the most mainstream news networks on the planet; she's elemental enough. I find it interesting that instead of giving me your analysis on the footage you pleaded for over several posts, you resort to ad hominem statements regarding skin thickness and anger. As far as Mr. Mankiewicz's reaction, his was very negative but much more reserved compared to Cenk's. They are basically in the same boat on this. Thanks for showing your bias.
@Annihilate3275 You may find her elemental; I follow business as part of my job, and there are hundreds who "represent business reporting on one of the most mainstream news networks on the planet".
Describing emotions and behavior isn't ad hominem. They're reactions and choices; not who you are. I'm searching my posts for pleading. You like to use the word "basically". I find that basically reductive. Mankiewicz likes Burnett; Cenk doesn't know her work. Nor do you.
@fairalways lol you should change your name to "fairwhenconvenient." Ironic that you refused to analyze her reporting even after all of this banter. You've dodged that from the very beginning. I'm sure your backtracking has entertained everyone in this video; it's definitely entertained me. As far as you not finding her elemental, I find it odd that you've devoted two days of your life to vehemently defending her on YT lol.
@Annihilate3275 I have analyzed more than enough of her reporting over the years to know you overreacted. The video here I am more qualified to analyze than you if not most. It is not "reporting" it is one other recent "report" to which you address; you have decided she's "enemy" rather than off-base without knowing her body of work. You sound irritated. You sound angry. And you sound like you have a healthy ego. So do I. I've been fair; you have not.
@fairalways "I have analyzed more than enough of her reporting over the years to know you overreacted. The video here I am more qualified to analyze than you if not most."
And you STILL won't analyze the recent OWS video she did that has been the primary cause of all this. You know that the video she did that painted the OWS protestors in a negative light is the issue, but you still REFUSE to speak in detail about it. Now you concentrate almost entirely on personal attacks. Coward.
@Annihilate3275 I did, in spite of the fact that you didn't address this video nor the obviousness that you don't know her work. She was off-base in her reporting of the essence of OWS. She wasn't wrong in what she said, she missed a larger narrative. I said as much already. See, you are showing the difference between "acting cowardly" (which I've not; I've been open where you've been invulnerable) and "coward". The first is not ad hominem; the second is. Note my skin thickness.
@fairalways Are you really 49? You seem to be much younger. Ok, you admit that she was off-base in the OWS video. That is putting it mildly. Also, simply being familiar with her past work does not negate the consequences of deriding the participants (OWS) in a major turning point in history. You need to accept that she deserves the backlash for that OWS segment. I see on your page that arguing and getting on people's nerves is normal for you. Having a rep like is nothing to be proud of.
@Annihilate3275 Yes, I wasn't harsh, as she was hardly vitriolic. I appreciate that you see yourself as a participant in "a major turning point in history". Maybe, who knows? As far as "backlash", contextual response may seem boring next to name-calling, like "snake", but inaccuracy inflames- just as you see with Ms. Burnett. As far as YT responses, you read them all? I let everyone leave one if they wish. I have plenty of love to show for my personality- or in spite of it.
@fairalways oh yes, classifying all the anger over Burnett's OWS reporting as wasting time by fretting is yet another example of your bias and ad hominem style. Isn't it ironic that someone that attempts to parade around saying he's "fair always" is in reality more biased than anyone in the room? As far as my snake comments, they're spot on. She's basically in bed with Wall Street (Goldman, CFR, Citi), and she reflects that in her "reporting" that influences her viewers. Dishonest "snake."
@Annihilate3275 I've been fair. You made an issue of Burnett, not this one report. I'm in a better position to judge, you being unfamiliar with her work. You've responded in a "cowboys and Indians", she's bad, you're good manner. She missed the main thrust of OWS. I've emailed CNBC hundreds of time when they've missed on issues. You're being reductive to serve your anger. As Burnett may have been reductive in some off-based defensiveness. Tit for tat?
@fairalways also keep in mind that if you google her name, you will see many journalists have came out and criticized her for that piece. The misrepresentations by Burnett are obvious and have already been noted in the two or three TYT pieces. Once you watch it, if you haven't already, I want you to tell me what YOUR analysis is.
@Annihilate3275 Yes, journalists have criticized her. Rightly so. Big difference from Cenk's work, much less your comment "she's a little snake". I realize that you're angry, and many have different skins thicknesses, but my original statement still stands, And had you watched Ms. Burnett in recent years, your reaction might be more like Mr. Mankiewicz's.
Erin Burnett began her career as a financial analyst for Goldman Sachs in their investment banking division, where she worked on mergers and acquisitions & corporate finance. While working as an investment-banking analyst, Burnett was offered a position at CNN as a writer & booker for CNN's Moneyline. From CNN, she moved to Citigroup, where she served as vice president for Citigroup/CitiMedia, & was responsible for all anchoring of the Citigroup online financial news network. Explains a lot!
Erin Burnett is a little snake. She is a former employee of Goldman Sachs. She is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Last but not least, she is engaged to a banker for Citigroup. Clearly one of the most biased "journalists" I've ever seen.
@Annihilate3275 Being involved in markets does not make one biased. I work in the market, and not only am I probably more outraged than you, I understand the way markets care less about who the good guys are and who the bad guys are than most non-market people. Cenk is not informed. For example, he says "...everybody on Wall Street was neck deep in derivatives". Just naive. And many in derivatives decried what they saw happening and got canned or ignored. Again, reductive.
@derberg19486 Untrue. Many on CNBC said it was cheaper to rent. I told family so, but I was ignored. Your anger is understandable, but it's not so easy to find who were the good guys and who were the bad guys.
Ted better turner around and get rid of her and put someone in who has the real beat of US! Aren't you old enough yet ted that you still can't let your ambitions calm down long enough to do the right thing? Come on already, remember glen train wreck beck and lou dobbs the slob? get a clue!
@mariobus2 Erin is very bright. You sound unfamiliar with her. Just because Cenk wrote her off with his not-so-veiled misogyny, doesn't mean Erin can't or won't see the nugget of value in the growing outrage.
Erin is a sell out, plain and simple. Ted Turner is part of the lies presented to US so that no one really sees the truth and we all decide to protest not just wall street, but our government for the buddy buddy bs they have gone to bed with these scum faces with. erin told a wall street protestor that we made a whopping 10 billion dollars from the bailouts! WOW erin 10 billion dollars after trillions of dollars, and I'm not just talking about recently, but down the years, error-in burn-it.
@mariobus2 - Erin Burnett actually isn't a sell out. She was born into money, went to a very expensive private college, she went to work for Goldman Sachs, became a "journalist", then married a super rich guy from Citigroup. She has always been in a very privileged position within the machine.
watch Erin Burnett on her new show OutFront, "I want people to say that our show is smart, I want our show to be authentic. I want our show to have courage." Erin Burnett said. All i want is for your show to be canceled and you to be raped by the bronze wall street bull
@RMNixon1 Have you watched her over the years at CNBC?
And what's with the misogyny? Being angry may make you feel entitled to decide you've found an easy target, and you may shoot your ejaculate on YT, but it reduces you to but one of a mob gang bang.
How would you know when the bubble would burst? Read the future? All people need to know and then make their own decisions. You need to stop your 20/20 hindsight, you suck
So this dill hole's point is that she can't foretell the future? Talk about sucking ass, The young Turkeys are the worst at it. They dont even know what they want out of the government until the democratic party says it's okay. very lame
If you allowed me to run cnn and msnbc for 2 weeks I would end up making changes that would make them as good or better than fox"news" and it would be very very simple: get rid of unattractive or even mediocre looking people and replace them with good looking ones. And uh, make them take a test to find out if they can meet the one and only requirement to be a teleprompter reader: read english off a teleprompter (LOL!)
@uruberrr so according to conservatives erin burnett is ugly??hahaha....u all old horny fox news viewers need to stop watching news all day and obsessing about old fox news hosts....and please i hope that other fox news hosts do not suffer the same fate which glenn beck had-you're fired!!!!
@themysticist Where are u getting this conservative thing from?
And fox"news" has the most and best looking teleprompter readers, if not Bloomberg. You can go ahead and watch this ratface with lipstick on cn... N LOL
If she weren't ugly she would have stayed, since more viewers would have watched. But then again, there are far uglier teleprompter readers like maria bimbo with the 38+ waist and a busted ugly face, especially when she has little makeup on
glenn beck made $32M a year. I'm not going to get specific but there's one thing going on right now and when that ends there's going to be another thing that's similar in some ways but I'm going to be in that range. I can easily 'retire' early and never do anything with the -- shall we say -- 'ENDURED/earned' money, but I'm going to pursue -- uhh something =)
g rid of some apes and moving others to weekends (btw where they still do the nigger issues thing) and removed the ugly humans like kyra and replaced them with better looking people.
Running a teleprompter reader network is braindead simple: You bring in the BEST looking people who can read teleprompters and those who can act and pretend (basically charlatans) like they're experts in whatever topic they're teleprmpter reading You are GUARANTEED TO SUCCEED W/ this business model. GUARANTEED.
chose to do this so they brought on monkey females. And get this: EVEN THE HUMAN WHITE FEMALES LOOKED DISGUSTING UGLY if you don't believe me look up 'kyra phillips'. Wait wait, it doesn't end there: they even TO THIS DAY focus on nigger issues -- imagine the nigger panthers having their ownteleprompter reader network.
The ramifications of this were severe and devastating -- their ratings became literally a joke because it fell so far down. Only recently did they make an about-face by gettin
If I was the owner of cnn, I would have fired every executive for this stupid demented business decision they made about 10 years ago:
Given that teleprompter readers need to attract viewers, and the easiest and best way to do that is to put on good-looking people to read teleprompters, they instead chose to pursue an extreme form of affirmative action -- I say extreme because I don't know about you, but putting makeup/fake-hair on a monkey/chimp/gorilla doesn't make it a human. Still they
I'm watching cnn to see this ugly ratface make her ratface debut I can't wait I can't wait!!! When is she gunna show up!!! It's 99% official I just wanna see this teleprompter reader from cnbs go even lower down the pole to cnn; she might get genital herpes from all those niggers over there; who knows it might have mutated into an airborne virus/disease
WHEN IS SHE COMIN ON!!! =D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The only fuckup who I can think of like ratface erin and chubby trish is trace gallagher from fox"news" this ostrich failure got RIGHTLY FIRED FROM A TELEPROMPTER READER JOB AT FOX"NEWS" AND GOT DEMOTED (DE-MOTED) WHAT A FUCKING LOSER THIS GUY IS THIS IS ALMOST A FUCKUP ON THE LEVEL OF FROGFACE MELISSA
So the chubby trish and now erin has a BIG RED "X" mark on their faces. These are all perpetrators, but compared to frogface Hollywood failed actress-become-teleprompter-reader melissa and the 38+ waist maria, they are almost nothing. Those two -- first of all, must be fired. Criminal charges must be brought against them there's no way around it this is even wrose than kitty genevese -- at least the victim died and that was the end, I endured, overall, over 13 months, torment WORSE THAN DEATH
This ugly ratface is VERY FORTUNATE that she's not employed by cnbs anymore bc there are impending criminal charges, MUCH MUCH more severe than -- lets say, 2 months ago against many of them. So she's fired. I say this bc it's involuntary. How do I know this? GOing from cnbs to cnn? WIth all those ape niggers? I'd rather be unemployed than read teleprompters for a living seriously. And we're talking about the least legit teleprompter reader network
lol erin ratface looks like just that -- a ratface. You take THE most makeup and the BEST makeup artists, lighting and seating and you still look like some rodent. I don't even wanna KNOW what this ratface looks like without the makeup. There's nothing like people who read teleprompetrs for a living who think they're experts or ever had a real job or in finance for that matter. Oh yeah, this one did, but she burnt out ergo cnbs.
LOL It's hilarious to hear the old "class warfare" charge, since the only war there's been has been the rich corporations, Wall Street, and conservative politicians waging war against the middle class and poor for many decades. You want fucking war greedy assholes? Well it can be done, because you haven't even come CLOSE to seeing it yet. Fucking scum.
I understand that all these chicks at CNBC have cat fights: Becky Quick, Trish Regan, Mellisa Francis, etc. Erin is fine, but if you watch her from different segments she stuffs her bra or wears thick push up bras. It's too bad that she's such a wall street apologist. Despite that, if she calls me, I'll give in and take her out, and then put it in.
I'm a high school drop out, dig ditches for a living for sewer tanks in mobile home parks and I knew it was a bubble. My all time favorite Erin Burnett clip /watch?v=5t67Goh__MI
Ya, I know were all a bunch of eaters, whats wrong with a little bit lead in our diet, or poison in our food? Like you said, gotta keep those mortages going with China's money.
I have an idea for those that dont like CNBC... dont watch it. I read a lot of comments from people like the commentator who obviously know nothing about business. Actually the crisis had its genesis with government policy that wanted to "promote home ownership".Erin Burnett does a great job as do most of the CNBC staff.
@tomterrific4 Did you watch the clip? Erin Burnett is deflecting Wall Street criticism as 'the government's fault', just like you do. It's the government and the people's fault, Wall Street were just doing their job. Erin Burnett is on your side in that clip.
I have an idea for you - Don't Watch criticism of CNBC and the economy will look fine.
@tomterrific4 -- (part1 ) Look up the definition of the word "token". It doesn't matter if you cover your ass with token reporting on an issue. What matters is the constant, repeated, day in day out drumbeat coverage. And 99.9999 % of the time CNBC sucks up to the criminal business class and their class-war against everybody that isn't rich.
Nobody is demagoguing anything you apologist. The friggin economy melted down. We are in the worst economic situation since the great depression.
@tomterrific4 -- (part 2) Millions of people have been financial ruined you idiot. This is a crisis of enormous proportions and people are RIGHTFULLY OUTRAGED. You are an ass kisser for her and CNBC. They and financial community have royally screwed the pooch and you are making excuses for them. If anything the public response has been far too mild. People should be in the streets making life hell on earth for these plutocrats that have broken everything.
@tomterrific4 -- (part 3) If you and the criminal business class don't like the coverage in the media don't screw everything up and break everything. Behave like human beings. Most importantly they need to TAKE RESPONSIBILITY for the enormous damage they have done and stop whining cause they are getting the rightful coverage they deserve. And they deserve much, much worse .
I removed the comment before last, to fit it in better.
Anyway: DERIVATIVES are the problem, not the subprime bubble. Our host impresses me that he knows this and mentions it. There are 1.5 quadrillion in bad debts (derviatives inter-laced over many companies). Yes, 1,500 trillion. The US has 1,000 of those. If you think you can shore up or support that, even if you should (fyi, you should NOT!!), well you can't shore it up anyway.
YAY! He's talking of the derivatives. Her idea that the "Armageddon people" couldn't have known it would be this bad? -- That's contradictory AND stupid: Webster Griffin Tarpley wrote how & what would happen, in 1997. Look him up. ---- She says Roosevelt = "bad" for a "SOAK" the rich tax???!! To her: People WORKING TOGETHER = PUTTING UP w/ RICH AGENDAS??!!! -- Then it's everybody's fault? Sure: they were ENCOURAGED to buy in! & Told protections were there. -- OH MY F-ING GOD this woman is S**t!!
Erin stop being a government puppet and for once interview Ron Paul on your TV show. why are you so afraid to question the Federal Reserve? you and the rest of you statist hacks pose as capitalists and defenders of the free market on your CNBC channel and give it a bad name as you folks are nothing more than statist morons. RON PAUL 2012.
@MetaIhead89 Being in a bank doesn't make one immoral. Many bankers don't want a repeat of what happened, and many want the bad eggs in their business held to account as it reflects horribly on them- as you are showing. Perhaps you should get a job in banking, for then you could make an accurate assessment. Banking itself isn't evil. Do you have money in a bank?
stop blaming the system. it is the human who screws up every system. the "systems" are fine, the human is a seething, greedy self-serving idiot for whom no system will ever work.
it's only a matter of time with this mindset. We'll cross ourselves out and blame the system like the idiots we are.
G'day !. Every day USA is blowing away the life of innocent children against the "war of terror " and here We have this stupid , non sense American woman talking against the prime minister of Australia Mr Kevin Rudd ; Pretending to care of what is going on in the middle of Australia . Back off from Australia you stupid bitch !.
Don't pretend to care about life when your name is DEATH .
wait, did you say that Santelli was the only sane person?
The guy who was saying that the TARP money should go to the bank and not "loser" homeowners because they didn't deserve it, and then proceeded to ask the ACTUAL people on Wall street standing behind him if they want to pay their neighbors mortgage? (basically just asking everyone to say "NO")
most of the people on these shows are rich, and most of the people watching them are not. How could they really have the same values and worries?
Home owners don't deserve it, just as banks do not deserve it. People bought too much house, banks leveraged too much. Can you help me pay my mortgage? Oh wait, I bought right, with a fixed and I save my money and stay out of debt. I agree with what you are saying about them being rich and out of touch though. Nobody in MSM works for the people, they work for their parent companies.
They want the CEOs as guest. CNBC does not know shit.
Wall Street is great according to CNBC. They can do no wrong & if they do someone else is to blame 20 times more. Then eventually realize no one likes someone after they are indicted and they start throwing under the bus even though they spent years kissing his ass, even months after the public turned on them. They still kiss up to Jack Welch and he's a dumbass. They'll kiss ass to people that run companies into the ground, Carly Firona.
Really? Its CNBC's fault? Really? How bout Repub. after Repub. screaming and yelling that something was wrong, and Barney Franks covering for Freddie and Fannie!
unfortunately when you've got the mojority of traders depending on you to report unbiased infomation, it's kinda hard to say other wise. The problem with basing your opinions on air is that if your wrong the rest of your competition holds you to it. Besides information changes every second of everyday, they don't want to stake their reputation on what could turn out to hurt their career.
The other day Mellisa Francis said on MSNBC that she did not care if companies did illegal, immoral or unethical things as long they made money for stock holders. WOW!
@70road Like Cenk said, if you say something that appears to be critical of big business and wall street, they won't give you an interview. All the business networks have to suck up to these greedy capitalists. So where do we get the truth.
@70road melissa francis: failed as a hollywood actress, failed as a 'on the money' host, started shit with howard stern and ended up looking like a fuckup that she is (he's got a $500M contract, this one's a co co-host at a teleprompter reader network sitting next to another fuckup kokehead kudlow), had some 'crude realities' show which she hosted and then failed. She's a complete fuckup and a ditz
CNBC just shameless whores for Wall St. Now Cramer is proclaiming the recession/depression is OVER! Oh yea, we got ourselves a jobless recovery! And nevermind we're a completely bankrupt nation with so much debt we can NEVER possibly repay it ever, Oh by the way, TYT sound like retarded superstoners.
lets put it this way , TYT is driving me absolutely crazy, the way you people are retarded to the point of less then evolved primates is the only thing disgusting here.
bill maher is retarded, he just QQs about everything. His logic is his beliefs cannot be wrong and so all that isn't his opinion must be, unfortunately he isn't that impressively smart to take on that logic so..... fail. All he said the whole interview is anyone that makes money is evil, even the Newark mayor tries him to be less retarded in a less mean way. Not like he will ever get the message.
It is great that you, and many other Americans, need to blame everyone else for their problems. The whole sub-prime market was created by Bill Clinton and Dems trying to create housing for those "less-fortunate". Basically, they passed legislation making it easy for people to take loans they couldn't afford. John McCain introduced a bill (Senate 190) that would have taken care of this problem, and excessive compensation. Barack Obama and Dems voted this bill down. It's not CNBC, it's Democrats!
Hm... kinda makes me take not paying my Federal taxes seriously. If that old fart in Florida can beat a case of not paying his taxes... damn it why can't I...(Check out Freedom to Fascism)
My banker convinced me that my rate wouldn't go past a certain point. He "highly doubted." He painted the image that in 5 yrs. when the payment could possibly go up. I will be Mid career making more money. Worse case senario I sell the home 3 fold of the purchase and walk or get into a diff package. They dn't offer packages to those who are laid off.
Have you noticed that businesses usually just want you right in the middle. Not Unemployed but not TOO rich to pay off your credit. Not Dead but not TOO healthy that you don't need medications... and honestly I know the credit companies TARGETED college students that had NO job to pay off their debt but would fall into the market place with debt already instilled. Unfortunately I was one of those students.
The solution to a burst bubble is to create a bigger bubble that encompasses all of the debt and bad investments of the previous bubble. The problem now is , the mother of all bubbles has burst and no one can figure out how to create an even bigger bubble. It seems that it may not happen; let's hope that no one figures out how to create an even bigger facade.
Bill Maher asked Erin Burnett the wrong question. Bill Maher should've asked if she was good at "sucking cock".
My friend at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government told me that he personally knows that Erin Burnett is a Great cock sucker...she sucked his cock many times in the past) and sucked her way to the top at CNBC.
T U DO.
IT GETS WORSE: THESE LOSERS START ASKING QUESTIONS LIKE: "WELL, WHY DID YOU SWING LIKE THAT? SHOULDN'T YOU BE PLANNING TO SWING THAT SHOT OVER HERE? WHY DID YOU CHOOSE TO PUT IT?"
THERE IS NO LICENSING OR SKILL REQUIRED TO BE A "journalist". YOU'RE A LOSER WHO READS TELEPROMTPERS AND SOMETIMES A RATFACE LIKE UGLY erin burnett WHO IS EXACTLY LIKE THE ANALOGY I JUST ILLUSTRATED
WHAT'S WORSE IS SHE'D BE 'BELOW AVERAGE' IF U RANKED THE CHARLATANS ON cnbs
Eleetnessful 1 week ago
WORKINGA T fox"business" OR cnbs IS LIKE THIS:
AND THIS IS GUNNA BE A GOOD ANALOGY:
IT'S LIKE A LOSER TELEPROMPTER READER FOR SPORTS, WHO NEVER SWUNG A GOLF CLUB, NEVER PLAYED GOLF, AND IS IN FACT HIHGLY OUT OF SHAPE SITTING ON A CHAIR WITH A SUIT AND TIE OR BLOUSE/SKIRT ASKING QUESTIONS (I ASK, YOU ANSWER; GOT IT!?) TO GOLF PLAYERS
AND ALL OF A SUDDEN, THE LOSER TELEPROMTPER RAEDER ACTS/TALKS LIKE HE/SHE IS TIGER WOODS AND A PRO-GOLFER. YOU READ TELEPROMTPERS AND ASK QUESTIONS. THAT IS WHA
Eleetnessful 1 week ago
WHEN IS cnn EVER GUNNA LEARN
THAT 7PM TIMESLOT HAS BEEN A REVOLVING DOOR FOR YEARS NOW
WHEN YOU PUT UGLY PPL LIKWE erin burnett TO READ TELEPROMTPERS, PPL DONT WATCH AND FLIP THE CHANNEL. IT'S THAT SIMPLE. THIS UGLY RATFACE CHARLATAN DOESN'T MAKE THE CUT FOR 'ATTRACTIVE TELEPROMTEPR READERS' (DESPITE ALL THAT MAKEUP WHICH MEANS I DONT EVEN WANNA KNOW WHAT THE RAT LOOKS LIKE W/O MAKEUP)
Eleetnessful 1 week ago
erin burnett is not a "sell out" she was never a legitimate journalist. she has spent her whole career climbing as hard as she could. she's marrying rich, she met her boss in a hot tub, her career is based on looking pretty and shilling for the banks
atalltimeswhenimflip 2 months ago in playlist Erin Burnett - Corporate Stooge 9
They just keep doing it to us. Remember Bushpig senior and the savings and loan scandal? Now they want us to return to the good old days of the depression. They want to steal your last nickel your penny is already worthless. No money for housing or healthcare or social security or education but plenty for bailouts and war. Erin go b.r.a., Back to Real America where there is no free lunch for wall street criminals, where fraud is still a crime.
EattherichBuddy 3 months ago
there's all kinds of whores. you don't necessarily have to give up the pussy. in fact prostitution of the body doesn't pay at all compared to soul whoring. And Erin's like the Mae West of the new intellectual/ethical hooker vanguard.
mitchgunthorpe 3 months ago
Everyone go to: watch?v=RCiAG7LF7Q4 if you want to see how ERIN BURNETT wishes to do some "honest reporting" on the Occupy Wall Street movement. It is a perfect example of what is wrong with mainstream media when it comes to bias.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
Erin research "Federal Reserve audited" thats why the protestors are protesting dumb bitch... Anyone who looks down upon the protestors seriously research
"FEDERAL RESERVE AUDITED"
They gave 16 trillion of OUR MONEY to foreign banks, corps OVERSEAS!!!!!!! while our country fell and continues to fall apart. The reason people question the protestors is because Mainstream doesn't and won't report the protest or the reason.. The corps run the media and don't want to expose their banker buddies.
Gtrplyr1 3 months ago
Erin Burnett is a little snake. She is a former employee of Goldman Sachs. She is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Finally, she is engaged to a banker from Citigroup. She is one of the most biased "journalists" ever.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
I expect the wrath of the many here, but the reductiveness here is indicative of the ugliness of mob mentality. Erin is bright and thoughtful. Wall Street is not monolithic. Heck, there is no "Wall Street", there are many people involved in many types of markets doing entirely different types of businesses. There is no test for morality, and people across that spectrum are as represented in markets as in any business. It just happens to be where the money moves.
Your move, mob.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways lol it's as if Burnett paid you to write these comments. Oh wait.
MetaIhead89 3 months ago
@MetaIhead89 It is, isn't it? Yet your flip response, angry as you are entitled to be, is empty. Neither working in markets, nor reporting about them, is inherently immoral. You have a huge mob behind you, but it's your responsibility alone to be moral and assess others' character and morality.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways nobody is buying your white knight crap about Burnett. The proof is out and the verdict is in. If you know her, tell her that life's getting ready to change.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 Anger is fine, but you'll have problems in marriage arguing "nobody" (much less "everybody", "always","never",or any other polarizing exaggeration). Your next line about "the proof being out" is another empty statement. Unfortunately, the proof is NOT out, which is why there are folks walking who should be in jail. "The verdict is in" implies that you've stepped over the line from angry plaintiff to Salem Witch hunting. I don't know her. I know reduction. Big problem.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways your pseudo-rationalizing is only fueling the fire. Nobody here is with you because they have seen what this shill, Erin Burnett, is about. All of your yapping and gibberish is simply confirming that you're biased and full of crap. Type her name into the search bar and see all the comments lately about her on ANY video. Accept it because yapping and gibberish to distract and persuade people is accomplishing the exact opposite of your intentions. Have a nice day.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 Mobs fuel their own fire. It wouldn't matter what I post if it didn't tow your line. Again with your "nobody". If you're in the company of such dogmatists, it may help you to feel empowered, but it doesn't change immoral and/or ignorant assumptions.
I don't hold mobs, nor YT responders to a very high standard. My only intention is to be my own voice; I'm sure of your gibberish, well intentioned as you believe. So rage; it's ultimately self-involved if not survival instinct.
fairalways 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 PS You're Canadian? Lots of oil field jobs in Canada. Well paying. You seem to have me confused with someone who doesn't understand the anger of many. There can be a useful point to the Wall Street protests; but I am certain of the low bar of understanding of most people anywhere, on any side of the many issues. Are you down on Wall Street right now? I'm a New Yorker.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways PS. Nice to see you've resorted to straw man retorts when it's clear you've failed in your attempt make any valid points to support your opinions. I think you know you've failed but your childish stubbornness to "get the last word" is only causing more people to go against you. Good job. Perhaps one day you'll learn that being obsessed with getting the last word in a losing argument only serves to defeat your original purpose. Have a nice Sunday arguing w/ more and more people.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 I'm being specific. Please point out what I've stated which is "straw man". I find that to be an overused and misused YT phrase. Being specific is different than stubborn. If you wish to move me from my point, address my point.
But seeing as it is you who is arguing (if not being polemic) while I'm discussing, I may respond until I understand either what lies beneath your anger.
fairalways 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fairalways as far as your strawman use, here you go: "Anger is fine, but you'll have problems in marriage arguing "nobody" (much less "everybody", "always","never",or any other polarizing exaggeration)" You're steering the topic away from Burnett's behavior to mine by implying I exaggerate and will have problems in marriage. Also, this is ironic since you chose the name "ALWAYSfair," which, according to you, is a polarizing exaggeration.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 I addressed this video, and in this video what she said was fair. You drew the topic to yourself with your unmeasured response. One could argue that you made the straw man when you directed the issue to ad hominem about Burnett and not her words in this video. As far as my name, you missed my purposeful irony. My point stands. Your marriage may be fine; your behavior is an issue. That is not, as you state, ad hominem.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways "As far as my name, you missed my purposeful irony." So this statement basically reveals that you're willfully biased. Thank you making my point. Any conversation after that revelation is excessive and pointless because you just exposed where you're coming from. Have a nice day.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 You seem to have a propensity to exaggerate. I aim for fairness. You clearly don't. I am fairly sure that my pointing out your use of "nobody" and other overstatements will be revisited by you someday. It would be nice if I had something to learn from you.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways lol one more thing (sorry there's so many things to point out with you). Do you realize how many of your posts have at least one sentence that has to reassure you and your audience that you're fair? If you have to keep saying you possess some kind of virtue over and over again, it looks like you actually doubt what you're saying in the first place. "If I keep saying it over and over, maybe everyone will believe it!" Fraud.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 Again, the difference between "acting fraudulently" (which I haven't) and "fraud" is ad hominem. Yes, fairness is the measurement of morality worth using in most YT exchanges. I'm sure the content of my words is more important than which words I use. I'm not your enemy; your anger is misplaced. Your insistent aggressive stance will also likely be a sticking point in any close relationship like marriage. Erin Burnett is larger than one report. As are you and I.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways My aggression is towards your refusal to hold a "journalist" to task for biased reporting, which in turn causes you to look biased as well. If you feel that her prior reporting somehow erases her OWS piece, then you are clearly entitled to that opinion. You just need to realize that the vast majority of people regarding this issue do not agree with you. Also, your claim that my argument with you somehow reflects on my marriage shows the depths you'll sink to to grasp at straws.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 I am all for holding a journalist to task. I think Mr, Mankiewicz did a good job. As far as "a vast majority of people" not agreeing with me, I'm not sure that's true. But if it is true, it's secondary.
fairalways 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 I did go too far with my second comment about aggression. Apologies. Unfair. You and I aren't married.
fairalways 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 PS no need to apologize.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways "PS no need to apologize" haha very cute. Behind every passive aggressive demeanor is an angry and resentful person. With the amount of time you've spent arguing, a significant amount of time and energy has been used. Trying to reassure the audience that you have "thick skin" reflects a desire for how you want to be perceived, not how you really feel. Regardless, nothing else is being accomplished, so I will let you have the last word. That seems to be your main goal anyway.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 Yes, I can see who has shown aggression here. Have I displayed either? I can do this easily; I work from home. I enjoy this; I'm good at it. You're correct about not needing to put my skin on display; although perception seems to be all we have on YT. Not like we know each other.
The "last word" thing? Back atcha. It would be honest if you said "OUR" main goal.
fairalways 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 PS So I'm understood, When I say "there are people walking who should be in jail", I mean specific, still largely publicly unidentified people in banks, hedge funds, ratings agencies, mortgage issuers and packagers; and specific market participants. If you wish your anger to have more power, do the detective work; find the point where said people crossed the line from aggressive business to immoral destruction. I want them doing hard time. You'll hurt innocent with your flailing.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways PS So I'm understood: The explosive hate (and growing) for Burnett is because of her slanderous, biased, and obnoxious reporting on the Occupy Wallstreet events. If you haven't seen it, then I suggest you watch it to get a better grasp of the situation. Perhaps if you had acknowledged that, then your statements would have received some respect. So again, based on her recent reporting footage, the proof IS out and the verdict IS in, whether you like it or not.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago 2
@Annihilate3275 Perhaps you can direct me to where I might find such reporting. I didn't see it here nor the one or two other YT videos I've watched. I haven't watched her on CNN, but I watched every day without fail on CNBC. That is what is addressed on this video. I'm not asking for respect by the way, I'm just asking for you to address direct points. So far you've responded with counterproductive, vague, yet understandable anger.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways as far as needing my help to find the YT videos, they're on the first page if you simply type her name. If you had an ounce of resourcefulness, you would have found them instead of asking for directions.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 Again, pick one video, and respond specifically to her specific statements. What are your specific grievances, what is it that drives you to OWS (are you there?), and point out a video in which Ms. Burnett has misunderstood you.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways bottom line. Watch the recent Burnett videos on her comments/reporting regarding OWS. This is the source of all the recent ire towards her. Until you analyze this catalyst, your viewpoint is entirely uneducated and ignorant. If you can't find them (they're on first page if you type her name), then that lack of resourcefulness is most likely not limited to simply looking for videos on youtube.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 I am responding to this video. As far as CNBC goes, the points Cenk made aren't valid. You have made no specific reference, other than you are angry. Calling me uneducated and ignorant flies in the face of my clarity. So far, I have yet to hear any insight from you to direct me to your logic. Why don't you make a specific reference to one specific YT video.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways since you need specific directions on how to find the footage even after I told you that plenty were on the first page when you search her name, here you go watch?v=SRGns6LaJgA. That's the show in its purest form.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 The only other reference on YT, edited by TYT, is Burnett's new show. Ben Mankiewicz prefaces his critique of Burnett's off-base report saying, I really like Erin Burnett. She got the protest wrong, but she's usually a pretty good reporter. He knows that she knows. That sounds fair. Cenk, on the other hand, obviously didn't watch CNBC a whole lot (for Burnett surprised cynical market watchers like myself with her insight and even-handedness), and seems a bit misogynistic.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways ok now that you've seen the footage of her recent reporting on OWS, we can understand each other much better. This is footage that has caused so much ire towards her as of late. It's an intentional misrepresentation of the situation and the participants involved. TYT reporting points it out adequately. I realize that you're a fan of her, so you may be a bit biased regarding the situation. Bottom line, this is a major turning point and she is trying to misrepresent it.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 I believe it is a turning point. Don't waste time fretting about Burnett. She's not elemental. Alan Grayson seems to be the clearest voice so far.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways she represents business reporting on one of the most mainstream news networks on the planet; she's elemental enough. I find it interesting that instead of giving me your analysis on the footage you pleaded for over several posts, you resort to ad hominem statements regarding skin thickness and anger. As far as Mr. Mankiewicz's reaction, his was very negative but much more reserved compared to Cenk's. They are basically in the same boat on this. Thanks for showing your bias.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 You may find her elemental; I follow business as part of my job, and there are hundreds who "represent business reporting on one of the most mainstream news networks on the planet".
Describing emotions and behavior isn't ad hominem. They're reactions and choices; not who you are. I'm searching my posts for pleading. You like to use the word "basically". I find that basically reductive. Mankiewicz likes Burnett; Cenk doesn't know her work. Nor do you.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways lol you should change your name to "fairwhenconvenient." Ironic that you refused to analyze her reporting even after all of this banter. You've dodged that from the very beginning. I'm sure your backtracking has entertained everyone in this video; it's definitely entertained me. As far as you not finding her elemental, I find it odd that you've devoted two days of your life to vehemently defending her on YT lol.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 I have analyzed more than enough of her reporting over the years to know you overreacted. The video here I am more qualified to analyze than you if not most. It is not "reporting" it is one other recent "report" to which you address; you have decided she's "enemy" rather than off-base without knowing her body of work. You sound irritated. You sound angry. And you sound like you have a healthy ego. So do I. I've been fair; you have not.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways "I have analyzed more than enough of her reporting over the years to know you overreacted. The video here I am more qualified to analyze than you if not most."
And you STILL won't analyze the recent OWS video she did that has been the primary cause of all this. You know that the video she did that painted the OWS protestors in a negative light is the issue, but you still REFUSE to speak in detail about it. Now you concentrate almost entirely on personal attacks. Coward.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 I did, in spite of the fact that you didn't address this video nor the obviousness that you don't know her work. She was off-base in her reporting of the essence of OWS. She wasn't wrong in what she said, she missed a larger narrative. I said as much already. See, you are showing the difference between "acting cowardly" (which I've not; I've been open where you've been invulnerable) and "coward". The first is not ad hominem; the second is. Note my skin thickness.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways Are you really 49? You seem to be much younger. Ok, you admit that she was off-base in the OWS video. That is putting it mildly. Also, simply being familiar with her past work does not negate the consequences of deriding the participants (OWS) in a major turning point in history. You need to accept that she deserves the backlash for that OWS segment. I see on your page that arguing and getting on people's nerves is normal for you. Having a rep like is nothing to be proud of.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 Yes, I wasn't harsh, as she was hardly vitriolic. I appreciate that you see yourself as a participant in "a major turning point in history". Maybe, who knows? As far as "backlash", contextual response may seem boring next to name-calling, like "snake", but inaccuracy inflames- just as you see with Ms. Burnett. As far as YT responses, you read them all? I let everyone leave one if they wish. I have plenty of love to show for my personality- or in spite of it.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways Apologies. I think it IS a major turning point; but it may not seem that way to many right now.
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways oh yes, classifying all the anger over Burnett's OWS reporting as wasting time by fretting is yet another example of your bias and ad hominem style. Isn't it ironic that someone that attempts to parade around saying he's "fair always" is in reality more biased than anyone in the room? As far as my snake comments, they're spot on. She's basically in bed with Wall Street (Goldman, CFR, Citi), and she reflects that in her "reporting" that influences her viewers. Dishonest "snake."
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 I've been fair. You made an issue of Burnett, not this one report. I'm in a better position to judge, you being unfamiliar with her work. You've responded in a "cowboys and Indians", she's bad, you're good manner. She missed the main thrust of OWS. I've emailed CNBC hundreds of time when they've missed on issues. You're being reductive to serve your anger. As Burnett may have been reductive in some off-based defensiveness. Tit for tat?
fairalways 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fairalways One last question. Based on your comments as well as the comments on your page, are you a Jew that works in the financial industry?
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@fairalways also keep in mind that if you google her name, you will see many journalists have came out and criticized her for that piece. The misrepresentations by Burnett are obvious and have already been noted in the two or three TYT pieces. Once you watch it, if you haven't already, I want you to tell me what YOUR analysis is.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 Yes, journalists have criticized her. Rightly so. Big difference from Cenk's work, much less your comment "she's a little snake". I realize that you're angry, and many have different skins thicknesses, but my original statement still stands, And had you watched Ms. Burnett in recent years, your reaction might be more like Mr. Mankiewicz's.
fairalways 3 months ago
Comment removed
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Erin Burnett began her career as a financial analyst for Goldman Sachs in their investment banking division, where she worked on mergers and acquisitions & corporate finance. While working as an investment-banking analyst, Burnett was offered a position at CNN as a writer & booker for CNN's Moneyline. From CNN, she moved to Citigroup, where she served as vice president for Citigroup/CitiMedia, & was responsible for all anchoring of the Citigroup online financial news network. Explains a lot!
raincheck01 3 months ago
Erin Burnett is a little snake. She is a former employee of Goldman Sachs. She is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Last but not least, she is engaged to a banker for Citigroup. Clearly one of the most biased "journalists" I've ever seen.
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
@Annihilate3275 Being involved in markets does not make one biased. I work in the market, and not only am I probably more outraged than you, I understand the way markets care less about who the good guys are and who the bad guys are than most non-market people. Cenk is not informed. For example, he says "...everybody on Wall Street was neck deep in derivatives". Just naive. And many in derivatives decried what they saw happening and got canned or ignored. Again, reductive.
fairalways 3 months ago
Erin is pretty. I wonder if she knows what happens to pretty Upper class women in the hands of outraged rebels...
leegeorgeson 3 months ago
@leegeorgeson What?
fairalways 3 months ago
Comment removed
Annihilate3275 3 months ago
CNBC encouraged more home buying, she is a LIAR, CNBC should have known.
derberg19486 3 months ago
@derberg19486 Untrue. Many on CNBC said it was cheaper to rent. I told family so, but I was ignored. Your anger is understandable, but it's not so easy to find who were the good guys and who were the bad guys.
fairalways 3 months ago
Ted better turner around and get rid of her and put someone in who has the real beat of US! Aren't you old enough yet ted that you still can't let your ambitions calm down long enough to do the right thing? Come on already, remember glen train wreck beck and lou dobbs the slob? get a clue!
mariobus2 3 months ago 2
@mariobus2 Erin is very bright. You sound unfamiliar with her. Just because Cenk wrote her off with his not-so-veiled misogyny, doesn't mean Erin can't or won't see the nugget of value in the growing outrage.
fairalways 3 months ago
Erin is a sell out, plain and simple. Ted Turner is part of the lies presented to US so that no one really sees the truth and we all decide to protest not just wall street, but our government for the buddy buddy bs they have gone to bed with these scum faces with. erin told a wall street protestor that we made a whopping 10 billion dollars from the bailouts! WOW erin 10 billion dollars after trillions of dollars, and I'm not just talking about recently, but down the years, error-in burn-it.
mariobus2 3 months ago 5
@mariobus2 - Erin Burnett actually isn't a sell out. She was born into money, went to a very expensive private college, she went to work for Goldman Sachs, became a "journalist", then married a super rich guy from Citigroup. She has always been in a very privileged position within the machine.
frokenstein 2 months ago
watch Erin Burnett on her new show OutFront, "I want people to say that our show is smart, I want our show to be authentic. I want our show to have courage." Erin Burnett said. All i want is for your show to be canceled and you to be raped by the bronze wall street bull
RMNixon1 4 months ago
@RMNixon1 Have you watched her over the years at CNBC?
And what's with the misogyny? Being angry may make you feel entitled to decide you've found an easy target, and you may shoot your ejaculate on YT, but it reduces you to but one of a mob gang bang.
fairalways 3 months ago
I don't like her philosophies, but DAYUM she is hot!!! Definetly my type. Brunette, tanned, leggy, smart, audacious. M-mmm!!
mojorhythm 5 months ago
@mojorhythm Do you know her "philospohies"?
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways Fuck the poor. Wall St--hooray!
mojorhythm 3 months ago
@mojorhythm Thought you might say that.
fairalways 3 months ago
How would you know when the bubble would burst? Read the future? All people need to know and then make their own decisions. You need to stop your 20/20 hindsight, you suck
Warehouse0127 6 months ago
So this dill hole's point is that she can't foretell the future? Talk about sucking ass, The young Turkeys are the worst at it. They dont even know what they want out of the government until the democratic party says it's okay. very lame
gunniesack 8 months ago
If you allowed me to run cnn and msnbc for 2 weeks I would end up making changes that would make them as good or better than fox"news" and it would be very very simple: get rid of unattractive or even mediocre looking people and replace them with good looking ones. And uh, make them take a test to find out if they can meet the one and only requirement to be a teleprompter reader: read english off a teleprompter (LOL!)
uruberrr 8 months ago
@uruberrr so according to conservatives erin burnett is ugly??hahaha....u all old horny fox news viewers need to stop watching news all day and obsessing about old fox news hosts....and please i hope that other fox news hosts do not suffer the same fate which glenn beck had-you're fired!!!!
themysticist 8 months ago
@themysticist Where are u getting this conservative thing from?
And fox"news" has the most and best looking teleprompter readers, if not Bloomberg. You can go ahead and watch this ratface with lipstick on cn... N LOL
If she weren't ugly she would have stayed, since more viewers would have watched. But then again, there are far uglier teleprompter readers like maria bimbo with the 38+ waist and a busted ugly face, especially when she has little makeup on
uruberrr 8 months ago
glenn beck made $32M a year. I'm not going to get specific but there's one thing going on right now and when that ends there's going to be another thing that's similar in some ways but I'm going to be in that range. I can easily 'retire' early and never do anything with the -- shall we say -- 'ENDURED/earned' money, but I'm going to pursue -- uhh something =)
Vague on purpose =D
uruberrr 8 months ago
g rid of some apes and moving others to weekends (btw where they still do the nigger issues thing) and removed the ugly humans like kyra and replaced them with better looking people.
Running a teleprompter reader network is braindead simple: You bring in the BEST looking people who can read teleprompters and those who can act and pretend (basically charlatans) like they're experts in whatever topic they're teleprmpter reading You are GUARANTEED TO SUCCEED W/ this business model. GUARANTEED.
uruberrr 8 months ago
chose to do this so they brought on monkey females. And get this: EVEN THE HUMAN WHITE FEMALES LOOKED DISGUSTING UGLY if you don't believe me look up 'kyra phillips'. Wait wait, it doesn't end there: they even TO THIS DAY focus on nigger issues -- imagine the nigger panthers having their ownteleprompter reader network.
The ramifications of this were severe and devastating -- their ratings became literally a joke because it fell so far down. Only recently did they make an about-face by gettin
uruberrr 8 months ago
If I was the owner of cnn, I would have fired every executive for this stupid demented business decision they made about 10 years ago:
Given that teleprompter readers need to attract viewers, and the easiest and best way to do that is to put on good-looking people to read teleprompters, they instead chose to pursue an extreme form of affirmative action -- I say extreme because I don't know about you, but putting makeup/fake-hair on a monkey/chimp/gorilla doesn't make it a human. Still they
uruberrr 8 months ago
I'm watching cnn to see this ugly ratface make her ratface debut I can't wait I can't wait!!! When is she gunna show up!!! It's 99% official I just wanna see this teleprompter reader from cnbs go even lower down the pole to cnn; she might get genital herpes from all those niggers over there; who knows it might have mutated into an airborne virus/disease
WHEN IS SHE COMIN ON!!! =D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
uruberrr 8 months ago
The only fuckup who I can think of like ratface erin and chubby trish is trace gallagher from fox"news" this ostrich failure got RIGHTLY FIRED FROM A TELEPROMPTER READER JOB AT FOX"NEWS" AND GOT DEMOTED (DE-MOTED) WHAT A FUCKING LOSER THIS GUY IS THIS IS ALMOST A FUCKUP ON THE LEVEL OF FROGFACE MELISSA
uruberrr 8 months ago
So the chubby trish and now erin has a BIG RED "X" mark on their faces. These are all perpetrators, but compared to frogface Hollywood failed actress-become-teleprompter-reader melissa and the 38+ waist maria, they are almost nothing. Those two -- first of all, must be fired. Criminal charges must be brought against them there's no way around it this is even wrose than kitty genevese -- at least the victim died and that was the end, I endured, overall, over 13 months, torment WORSE THAN DEATH
uruberrr 8 months ago
This ugly ratface is VERY FORTUNATE that she's not employed by cnbs anymore bc there are impending criminal charges, MUCH MUCH more severe than -- lets say, 2 months ago against many of them. So she's fired. I say this bc it's involuntary. How do I know this? GOing from cnbs to cnn? WIth all those ape niggers? I'd rather be unemployed than read teleprompters for a living seriously. And we're talking about the least legit teleprompter reader network
kitty genevese
uruberrr 8 months ago
And now he would never say this...
skidude747 9 months ago
tvallure.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Erin-Burnett-DCs-the-new-NYC.jpg
uruberrr 10 months ago
cwomen.com/pictures/erin-burnett-0001.jpg
uruberrr 10 months ago
this fucking ugly ratface is going to get locked up or fired soon. fucking ugly wide nosed rat face. her nose almost looks as wide as a niggers'
uruberrr 10 months ago
lol erin ratface looks like just that -- a ratface. You take THE most makeup and the BEST makeup artists, lighting and seating and you still look like some rodent. I don't even wanna KNOW what this ratface looks like without the makeup. There's nothing like people who read teleprompetrs for a living who think they're experts or ever had a real job or in finance for that matter. Oh yeah, this one did, but she burnt out ergo cnbs.
uruberrr 10 months ago
I was clicking around and stopped short @ Erin Burnett. so pretty.
btwall60 10 months ago
LOL It's hilarious to hear the old "class warfare" charge, since the only war there's been has been the rich corporations, Wall Street, and conservative politicians waging war against the middle class and poor for many decades. You want fucking war greedy assholes? Well it can be done, because you haven't even come CLOSE to seeing it yet. Fucking scum.
ridewave444 11 months ago
erin bernette is a CEO groupie, she'd suck her own dick to get ahead.
mpower6428 1 year ago
I understand that all these chicks at CNBC have cat fights: Becky Quick, Trish Regan, Mellisa Francis, etc. Erin is fine, but if you watch her from different segments she stuffs her bra or wears thick push up bras. It's too bad that she's such a wall street apologist. Despite that, if she calls me, I'll give in and take her out, and then put it in.
tegeagent007 1 year ago
Erin got the flag. Patriotic. Erin. I believe in you., because you are Wall Street!
Zander242 1 year ago
I'll take FoxBiz Network Babes over CNBC Money Honeys anyday! The latter are really rough looking.
1977Melville 1 year ago
I'm a high school drop out, dig ditches for a living for sewer tanks in mobile home parks and I knew it was a bubble. My all time favorite Erin Burnett clip /watch?v=5t67Goh__MI
Ya, I know were all a bunch of eaters, whats wrong with a little bit lead in our diet, or poison in our food? Like you said, gotta keep those mortages going with China's money.
ElCajoia 1 year ago
I have an idea for those that dont like CNBC... dont watch it. I read a lot of comments from people like the commentator who obviously know nothing about business. Actually the crisis had its genesis with government policy that wanted to "promote home ownership".Erin Burnett does a great job as do most of the CNBC staff.
tomterrific4 1 year ago
@tomterrific4 Did you watch the clip? Erin Burnett is deflecting Wall Street criticism as 'the government's fault', just like you do. It's the government and the people's fault, Wall Street were just doing their job. Erin Burnett is on your side in that clip.
I have an idea for you - Don't Watch criticism of CNBC and the economy will look fine.
PFB1994 1 year ago
Looks like the Young Jerk guy, has been mixing alchohol and Ambien all night long.
Dwildfox 1 year ago
this is an un fair piece ... she said she and others saw it coming. you are populist demogues.
tomterrific4 1 year ago
@tomterrific4 -- (part1 ) Look up the definition of the word "token". It doesn't matter if you cover your ass with token reporting on an issue. What matters is the constant, repeated, day in day out drumbeat coverage. And 99.9999 % of the time CNBC sucks up to the criminal business class and their class-war against everybody that isn't rich.
Nobody is demagoguing anything you apologist. The friggin economy melted down. We are in the worst economic situation since the great depression.
tom6612 1 year ago
@tomterrific4 -- (part 2) Millions of people have been financial ruined you idiot. This is a crisis of enormous proportions and people are RIGHTFULLY OUTRAGED. You are an ass kisser for her and CNBC. They and financial community have royally screwed the pooch and you are making excuses for them. If anything the public response has been far too mild. People should be in the streets making life hell on earth for these plutocrats that have broken everything.
tom6612 1 year ago
@tomterrific4 -- (part 3) If you and the criminal business class don't like the coverage in the media don't screw everything up and break everything. Behave like human beings. Most importantly they need to TAKE RESPONSIBILITY for the enormous damage they have done and stop whining cause they are getting the rightful coverage they deserve. And they deserve much, much worse .
You are a joke.
tom6612 1 year ago
I removed the comment before last, to fit it in better.
Anyway: DERIVATIVES are the problem, not the subprime bubble. Our host impresses me that he knows this and mentions it. There are 1.5 quadrillion in bad debts (derviatives inter-laced over many companies). Yes, 1,500 trillion. The US has 1,000 of those. If you think you can shore up or support that, even if you should (fyi, you should NOT!!), well you can't shore it up anyway.
boobah1067 1 year ago
YAY! He's talking of the derivatives. Her idea that the "Armageddon people" couldn't have known it would be this bad? -- That's contradictory AND stupid: Webster Griffin Tarpley wrote how & what would happen, in 1997. Look him up. ---- She says Roosevelt = "bad" for a "SOAK" the rich tax???!! To her: People WORKING TOGETHER = PUTTING UP w/ RICH AGENDAS??!!! -- Then it's everybody's fault? Sure: they were ENCOURAGED to buy in! & Told protections were there. -- OH MY F-ING GOD this woman is S**t!!
boobah1067 1 year ago
Comment removed
boobah1067 1 year ago
cenks an idiot
RangerDangerK 1 year ago
Suck wall street ass...... sickening, money talks and people walk, Paul Schiff predicted it on CNBC 2006 and these pricks laughed at him.....
deelievense 1 year ago
CNBC is like the brainwashed cult member.
70road 1 year ago
GREAT VIDEO! Thanks for sharing!
Happy Trading!
StockMarketVideo 1 year ago
Comment removed
ERROLCUSTERFLYNN4EVR 1 year ago
That Erin Burnett is sharp. In fact, all the so called CNBC money honeys are focused, qualified, inquisitive and bright commentators.
HeadlessNorseman 1 year ago
smart dude.
trisix99 2 years ago
Watch "Peter Schiff was right CNBC edition"
gilbertl2000 2 years ago
Peter Schiff was making appearances on CNBC for years talking about the coming financial crisis.
gilbertl2000 2 years ago
erin burnett is the dumbest little rat faced whore on tv.
the woman is utterly clueless, brainless and useless when discussing economics.
she represents the typical brainless dumb american.
stealthpakfa 2 years ago
id do her though
SecularTalk 2 years ago
shes a man dressed as a woman.
its a penis down south not a pussy
stealthpakfa 2 years ago
Erin stop being a government puppet and for once interview Ron Paul on your TV show. why are you so afraid to question the Federal Reserve? you and the rest of you statist hacks pose as capitalists and defenders of the free market on your CNBC channel and give it a bad name as you folks are nothing more than statist morons. RON PAUL 2012.
rooper666hell 2 years ago 5
@rooper666hell she's marrying a CITI bank guy
MetaIhead89 3 months ago
@MetaIhead89 So?
fairalways 3 months ago
@fairalways Is that a serious question? So she's biased.
MetaIhead89 3 months ago
@MetaIhead89 Being in a bank doesn't make one immoral. Many bankers don't want a repeat of what happened, and many want the bad eggs in their business held to account as it reflects horribly on them- as you are showing. Perhaps you should get a job in banking, for then you could make an accurate assessment. Banking itself isn't evil. Do you have money in a bank?
fairalways 3 months ago
stop blaming the system. it is the human who screws up every system. the "systems" are fine, the human is a seething, greedy self-serving idiot for whom no system will ever work.
it's only a matter of time with this mindset. We'll cross ourselves out and blame the system like the idiots we are.
uturniaphobic 2 years ago
TYT are becoming more and more unbalanced and one-eyed
jpkm123 2 years ago
yeah, protect the people wo make the big money. do real journalism and lose your so called journalism job. soak the rich!?
when you give trillions of dollars to the unemployed then ill beleive it. and of course lets spread the blame to those at the bottom.
zrac09 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
G'day !. Every day USA is blowing away the life of innocent children against the "war of terror " and here We have this stupid , non sense American woman talking against the prime minister of Australia Mr Kevin Rudd ; Pretending to care of what is going on in the middle of Australia . Back off from Australia you stupid bitch !.
Don't pretend to care about life when your name is DEATH .
blinkangels44 2 years ago
did this fucker predict the bubble. NO
PrinceDarius2000 2 years ago
is this fucker an economist?
is this fucker's job to predict bubbles?
jrobl22357 2 years ago
Santelli is the only sain person on GE-NBC
Kblues80 2 years ago
wait, did you say that Santelli was the only sane person?
The guy who was saying that the TARP money should go to the bank and not "loser" homeowners because they didn't deserve it, and then proceeded to ask the ACTUAL people on Wall street standing behind him if they want to pay their neighbors mortgage? (basically just asking everyone to say "NO")
most of the people on these shows are rich, and most of the people watching them are not. How could they really have the same values and worries?
junkyardmonkie 2 years ago 4
Home owners don't deserve it, just as banks do not deserve it. People bought too much house, banks leveraged too much. Can you help me pay my mortgage? Oh wait, I bought right, with a fixed and I save my money and stay out of debt. I agree with what you are saying about them being rich and out of touch though. Nobody in MSM works for the people, they work for their parent companies.
Kblues80 2 years ago
They want the CEOs as guest. CNBC does not know shit.
Wall Street is great according to CNBC. They can do no wrong & if they do someone else is to blame 20 times more. Then eventually realize no one likes someone after they are indicted and they start throwing under the bus even though they spent years kissing his ass, even months after the public turned on them. They still kiss up to Jack Welch and he's a dumbass. They'll kiss ass to people that run companies into the ground, Carly Firona.
stang661 2 years ago
Really? Its CNBC's fault? Really? How bout Repub. after Repub. screaming and yelling that something was wrong, and Barney Franks covering for Freddie and Fannie!
Wadegarrett76 2 years ago
unfortunately when you've got the mojority of traders depending on you to report unbiased infomation, it's kinda hard to say other wise. The problem with basing your opinions on air is that if your wrong the rest of your competition holds you to it. Besides information changes every second of everyday, they don't want to stake their reputation on what could turn out to hurt their career.
caliboy312 2 years ago
CNBC reports financial news. It is not their job to prognosticate the financial future, which the best economists in the world can not do.
smadonna 2 years ago
Poor Erin, what a wreck.
davids11131113 2 years ago 2
The other day Mellisa Francis said on MSNBC that she did not care if companies did illegal, immoral or unethical things as long they made money for stock holders. WOW!
70road 2 years ago 10
Surprised?
EFunkRock 2 years ago
@70road. Seriously? What a cow!
Melville10 1 year ago
@70road. I think I heard that too! What a shill! I guess when you have a face that resembles a horse, you have to do something to keep your job.
1977Melville 1 year ago
@70road Like Cenk said, if you say something that appears to be critical of big business and wall street, they won't give you an interview. All the business networks have to suck up to these greedy capitalists. So where do we get the truth.
tegeagent007 1 year ago
@70road melissa francis: failed as a hollywood actress, failed as a 'on the money' host, started shit with howard stern and ended up looking like a fuckup that she is (he's got a $500M contract, this one's a co co-host at a teleprompter reader network sitting next to another fuckup kokehead kudlow), had some 'crude realities' show which she hosted and then failed. She's a complete fuckup and a ditz
uruberrr 10 months ago
CNBC just shameless whores for Wall St. Now Cramer is proclaiming the recession/depression is OVER! Oh yea, we got ourselves a jobless recovery! And nevermind we're a completely bankrupt nation with so much debt we can NEVER possibly repay it ever, Oh by the way, TYT sound like retarded superstoners.
davids11131113 2 years ago 3
lets put it this way , TYT is driving me absolutely crazy, the way you people are retarded to the point of less then evolved primates is the only thing disgusting here.
shiryuuclone 2 years ago
bill maher is retarded, he just QQs about everything. His logic is his beliefs cannot be wrong and so all that isn't his opinion must be, unfortunately he isn't that impressively smart to take on that logic so..... fail. All he said the whole interview is anyone that makes money is evil, even the Newark mayor tries him to be less retarded in a less mean way. Not like he will ever get the message.
shiryuuclone 2 years ago
It is great that you, and many other Americans, need to blame everyone else for their problems. The whole sub-prime market was created by Bill Clinton and Dems trying to create housing for those "less-fortunate". Basically, they passed legislation making it easy for people to take loans they couldn't afford. John McCain introduced a bill (Senate 190) that would have taken care of this problem, and excessive compensation. Barack Obama and Dems voted this bill down. It's not CNBC, it's Democrats!
trbrome 2 years ago
CNBC is in on the take. Erin Burnett shows up
on the Today Show with Jim, Mad Money, Cramer
to make excuses. Cramer was exposed by
Jon Stewart on the Daily Show. Did Cramer lose
money? Ms. Burnett has to play along or lose her
job.
4u2b1ib12 2 years ago 2
Hm... kinda makes me take not paying my Federal taxes seriously. If that old fart in Florida can beat a case of not paying his taxes... damn it why can't I...(Check out Freedom to Fascism)
PyroHaven07 2 years ago
Peter Schiffer did say it and everyone laughed at him.
rgman268 2 years ago
My banker convinced me that my rate wouldn't go past a certain point. He "highly doubted." He painted the image that in 5 yrs. when the payment could possibly go up. I will be Mid career making more money. Worse case senario I sell the home 3 fold of the purchase and walk or get into a diff package. They dn't offer packages to those who are laid off.
gingerbred211 2 years ago
Have you noticed that businesses usually just want you right in the middle. Not Unemployed but not TOO rich to pay off your credit. Not Dead but not TOO healthy that you don't need medications... and honestly I know the credit companies TARGETED college students that had NO job to pay off their debt but would fall into the market place with debt already instilled. Unfortunately I was one of those students.
PyroHaven07 2 years ago
theyre NOT a new hanel they are a paid for by and to benefit these companies - they are a propaganda machine. period.
ccm800 2 years ago
Thanks for the video clips. I'm so poor that I don't even get HBO.
But, Larry Kudlow on CNBC denied that there was a housing bubble. And he called people "bubbleheads" for telling him there was.
CNBC is nothing about honest, objective, fact-checking journalism. They are in bed with CEOs and malicious traders.
AboundInGoodness 2 years ago
Cenk nailed it.
DarthandDirtyCheney 2 years ago
"butt buddies" Cenk? That's a little too Rush for me. Just sayin'
GrownupPhan 2 years ago
I have to agree with Cenk... Erin Burnett is FINE AS HELL! Oh, and she does kiss the asses of all those Corporations as well.... lol
billionaireby16 2 years ago 2
Fuck Erin Burnett and all the rest of the apologists for wall street.
rooley 2 years ago 5
leave Erin alone shes hot
Johnblz00 2 years ago
"I predict you would ask me this question", that's just about all your good for....geez
blastedwpg 2 years ago
Cenk you should be on Maher's show.
freewngs 2 years ago 5
stop making a billion videos a day!
inmyownblood 2 years ago
was about to say the same thing.
RealTruBeatz 2 years ago
The solution to a burst bubble is to create a bigger bubble that encompasses all of the debt and bad investments of the previous bubble. The problem now is , the mother of all bubbles has burst and no one can figure out how to create an even bigger bubble. It seems that it may not happen; let's hope that no one figures out how to create an even bigger facade.
rollsthepaul 2 years ago
Lol, she could accurately predict a question Bill Maher was going to ask her, but couldn't make any economic predictions that worth a shit.
Maybe she's in the wrong business.
ogjimkenobi 2 years ago 2
Bill Maher asked Erin Burnett the wrong question. Bill Maher should've asked if she was good at "sucking cock".
My friend at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government told me that he personally knows that Erin Burnett is a Great cock sucker...she sucked his cock many times in the past) and sucked her way to the top at CNBC.
littlegayfairy 2 years ago