I guess it just me, but the U2 version of this song is better, never been much of a Beatles fan. They wrote their own songs but what did their songs mean? They were doped up(I'm not judging) and they were just putting words together.
@TheSquishyTanker I did and the Beatles music is so basic it's frustrating to listen. They give credit for writing their own songs but "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" was just a picture John's son drew. The Beatles are whitebread, no soul like Led Zep, The Stones, or U2
...you're kidding, right? Lucy in the Sky was BASED of a picture, his son didn't write it for them. And, you've obviously never listened to Helter Skelter, Golden Slumbers/Carry That Weight/The End or tons of others to say something as ridiculous as "The Beatles are whitebread".
@TheSquishyTanker Whitebread, Don't debate when Ringo Starr wasn't even taken seriously in the band. Wasn't Pete Best the first choice, but he didn't want to be in a "boy band" and want to be himself, which the Beatles became anyway, themselves. U2's version is better to me, Stop acting like there were no music before or after the Beatles. Yeah they wrote their own music but Bob Dylan was better, didn't Dylan tell the Beatles to stop writing pop songs?
U2 blows the Beatles AWAY! The beatles hardly made it 10 years, they never came close to any kind of record grossing tour. This song was remixed for starters and was on the Pop album, which was a change of sound for them.
The beatles simply came along at the right time...in esscence...they were LUCKY!
@dashasohn I love U2, but I also love the Beatles. They had plenty of record breaking tours, and that was back in the 60's. They were as revolutionary for their time as U2 are today. U2 love the Beatles, just look at all their covers. There's this, they covered Instant Karma once, and Bono often sings Blackbird at the end of 'Beautiful Day'. Without the Beatles, U2 probably wouldn't sound like they do, if they were around at all.
in fairness...has anyone covered a beatles song right?...no one has even come close to the beatles...they set the bar...and that bar...is way up there...
In all honesty, I don't know if the Beatles would have particularly fancied this version, but as musicians I know they would have respected U2's curiosity and ambitious approach to the song. Personally, I think it's extraordinarily different in a very good way.
this song rocks but if your an over the hill beatles fan hard core . then you wont get it,some things can be improved u2 did that for this song sorry beates groupys
@revnmalak oh the original is ruined now? You can't find it anymore? That's a shame. Its' a cover, not ment to eb a carbon copy.. If this was NIN people would be "whoa very interesting" but it's U2 so people bag on it. Oh and a little FYI original isn't ruined. You can still listen to it any time you want and it will be as good as ever despite your feelings on U2's version here.
YouTube culture dictates that you should seek out songs you dislike and flame them for no reason. Irony is mocking others egos while pumping up your own with anonymity.
I hate both U2 and Bono. He seems to think he's as good as the Beatles. What a joke! None of his songs will stand the test of time. They are just noise to me.
wow I'm usually pretty cool with people doing different versions of stuff if it's creative or avante guard but this is just really a project gone wrong if there ever was one. this is just really not very good, in fact pretty bad.......
More meandering crap from washed up U2. They should have quit 20 yrs ago when they were ahead and not making fools of themselves. Boner lost it somewhere 'round mid 90s and has never returned to normal. He's a slightly thinner Elvis (fat/later yrs)
Have loved U2 since before October. Love their covers (incl. Helter Skelter).
what is this crap. Happiness was one of John's best songs and maybe one of the reasons we all bought the white album in 1969. this has to be joke for some dance clubs minions who don't care about music, just a cool line and a repeated beat. sorry, I have to vomit now
Shut up ! U2 areFANTASTIC!! and this version is very nice.. maybe alot diffrent then the original, but still they bring something new to the table!! VERY NICE
o i cant help it. i know this cover sucks and yes i know the original totally kicks ass, but hell, i fuckin fuckin love this tune! maybe its just because its u2 stuff that everyone seems to hate. they're just genius. everytime i just try to forget its a beatles cover. this is awesome
I can't believe the hate there is for this song. I always liked it. I liked the dark psychedelia of this version. And that's what it is: a version. But then some Beatles fans seem to think the Beatles invented music itself.
pero q mierda es esa tanto c parten la madre esos welles para acer estas mierda i para transformar algo tan maravilloso d los beatles en algo d mierda d un grupo d mil conchas como U2 no mames
eh not as good as the Beatles or lennon to be more specific but at least theyre trying to bring the Beatles to more little youngins which i appreciate
I have to thank U2 if i know this song .This was their style all along the recording of POPMART.I believe they just wanted to let youngsters in their teens to get to know BEATLES music which i believe is a great cause to support
well, just read it: it's a mix and they were trying out something new...perhaps it didn't work out, but stop shitting around about Bono, he and U2 have dominated music for the last 25 years and with their influence for future bands to come!!
i'm sure that lennon as a progressive and open minded songwiter would love this version!
this cover was a progressive experiment in the middle 90s. a beatles fan should respect it even he dosen't like it, as the beatles was quite experimental in the 60s as well.
Yeah what the last guy said I guess, it's just too everywhere. The beat though is terrible considering it's a Beatles song... also Bono rapping is about as bad as Lil Wayne trying to sing "rock" music.
This actually isn't as terrible as you guys are making it out to be. It's got a good beat and Bono's vocals are decent-- it's just that it's very all-over-the-place and extremely hard to follow and pay attention to for a while.
I dont know who decided Bono was so cool, but I really frickin hate this guy for some reason, The Edge should go out on his own get away from this loser band! Dont mean to be a hater, just got a right to voice my opinion and I'm gonna do just that.
This cover sucks balls! I thought a band like U2 would have been more respectful of the classics..especially the Beatles repertoire......fuck you Bono!
i need a fix. whatever that fix might be. talking about what might be... i gotta cover of this great song that i do not pretend to do justice to but i'd love your opinion and not mine. much love, amor, y paz
This is shit.U2 are a shit band anyways they just know how to play the game,I'd rate Oasis as being a 100 times better then them and I would'nt even bother trying to compare them to the Beatles who are just the best there ever was and ever will be. U2 lovers don't start slaggin me off now im just being honest sure I'm from were they're from and I don't even know anyone who likes them
The Across The Universe actor's version is alright though!!!
Is The Beatles' version better? Well, yes, clearly. They were the ones who wrote it and they are the best band of all time.
This was the B-side to a song on U2's shittiest album, Pop. And the whole album was this kind of thing. I'm a huge~ U2 fan, but I never quite understood their electronic phase.
All that being said, this version is different, but it's not shite. It's pretty good, and there are a lot of covers that are worse.
It's a cover, not the real song, so nothing's happened to the original song, so go listen to that song if you hate this one so much.
w33zlmusic 3 weeks ago
I guess it just me, but the U2 version of this song is better, never been much of a Beatles fan. They wrote their own songs but what did their songs mean? They were doped up(I'm not judging) and they were just putting words together.
aamanitwo 2 months ago
@aamanitwo
This is the most stupid thing I've heard all week, and it's been a long week.
Read into things. Their lyrics make a lot of sense.
Either way, this cover is horrid and should burn.
TheSquishyTanker 3 weeks ago
@TheSquishyTanker I did and the Beatles music is so basic it's frustrating to listen. They give credit for writing their own songs but "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" was just a picture John's son drew. The Beatles are whitebread, no soul like Led Zep, The Stones, or U2
aamanitwo 2 weeks ago
@aamanitwo
...you're kidding, right? Lucy in the Sky was BASED of a picture, his son didn't write it for them. And, you've obviously never listened to Helter Skelter, Golden Slumbers/Carry That Weight/The End or tons of others to say something as ridiculous as "The Beatles are whitebread".
TheSquishyTanker 2 weeks ago
@TheSquishyTanker Whitebread, Don't debate when Ringo Starr wasn't even taken seriously in the band. Wasn't Pete Best the first choice, but he didn't want to be in a "boy band" and want to be himself, which the Beatles became anyway, themselves. U2's version is better to me, Stop acting like there were no music before or after the Beatles. Yeah they wrote their own music but Bob Dylan was better, didn't Dylan tell the Beatles to stop writing pop songs?
aamanitwo 2 weeks ago
i love u2, but i prefer the beatles version
000xyz 4 months ago
This is from the Pop album. POP, people, Get it? I think it is hillarious.
rayleverkunst 4 months ago
U2 blows the Beatles AWAY! The beatles hardly made it 10 years, they never came close to any kind of record grossing tour. This song was remixed for starters and was on the Pop album, which was a change of sound for them.
The beatles simply came along at the right time...in esscence...they were LUCKY!
dashasohn 5 months ago
@dashasohn I love U2, but I also love the Beatles. They had plenty of record breaking tours, and that was back in the 60's. They were as revolutionary for their time as U2 are today. U2 love the Beatles, just look at all their covers. There's this, they covered Instant Karma once, and Bono often sings Blackbird at the end of 'Beautiful Day'. Without the Beatles, U2 probably wouldn't sound like they do, if they were around at all.
MrAlbinoPanther 4 months ago
in fairness...has anyone covered a beatles song right?...no one has even come close to the beatles...they set the bar...and that bar...is way up there...
MrHoward727 5 months ago
holy smokes, this was awful.
JettaGirl 5 months ago
sounds like theyre trying to be depeche mode covering the beatles? what a load of shit
kezzarhcp 5 months ago 2
In all honesty, I don't know if the Beatles would have particularly fancied this version, but as musicians I know they would have respected U2's curiosity and ambitious approach to the song. Personally, I think it's extraordinarily different in a very good way.
DMcCU2 6 months ago
Cool ♥ I love this song :)
missvampire101010 6 months ago
You don't get it: it's a buddhist lesson on vacuity...
balluduku 6 months ago
this song rocks but if your an over the hill beatles fan hard core . then you wont get it,some things can be improved u2 did that for this song sorry beates groupys
bergbaxter 6 months ago
oh no! why? this is such a good song by the beatles
teigue1986 6 months ago
@teigue1986 yea im a hardcore beatles fan, but yea this song is awesome. but theoriginal is a little more eire. wich is unique
nirvana2thedoors 6 months ago
this kinda blows... a lot
born2bdumb18 7 months ago
I kinda dig it '-'
FriedChickenofDeath6 7 months ago
might as well have just spit on the beatles grave. seems more like mockery
taylorcharlie36 7 months ago
The Depeche Mode early 2000's mix... ugg. Love U2, but this isn't too good.
hasty1982 7 months ago
Cacky poo poo nah nah!
certificate18flix 7 months ago
Two words: (a) pig's; (b) ear.
TDJCCSGC 7 months ago
I'm a huge U2 fan. But I'm also a huge Beatles fan and this kinda sucks.
hypernadothe3rd 7 months ago
Leave it to U2 to wreck a great song.
revnmalak 7 months ago 8
@revnmalak oh the original is ruined now? You can't find it anymore? That's a shame. Its' a cover, not ment to eb a carbon copy.. If this was NIN people would be "whoa very interesting" but it's U2 so people bag on it. Oh and a little FYI original isn't ruined. You can still listen to it any time you want and it will be as good as ever despite your feelings on U2's version here.
Hallucination 4 months ago 2
@Hallucination well said!
sfxrules 2 months ago
YouTube culture dictates that you should seek out songs you dislike and flame them for no reason. Irony is mocking others egos while pumping up your own with anonymity.
It's easy to hate and hard to love.
Just move on.
burmanmusic 7 months ago
what a shit !
sinmuchoquedecir 7 months ago
I hate both U2 and Bono. He seems to think he's as good as the Beatles. What a joke! None of his songs will stand the test of time. They are just noise to me.
rocharua 7 months ago
@dandan478 it ruined the song dude i thought it would be cool, but nope
MangoFreakout22 8 months ago
kill it with fire
ryanlolz92 8 months ago
Yikes. Makes APC's cover of When The Levee Breaks seem brilliant.
Trillia750 8 months ago
wow I'm usually pretty cool with people doing different versions of stuff if it's creative or avante guard but this is just really a project gone wrong if there ever was one. this is just really not very good, in fact pretty bad.......
UndercoverJ7 8 months ago
More meandering crap from washed up U2. They should have quit 20 yrs ago when they were ahead and not making fools of themselves. Boner lost it somewhere 'round mid 90s and has never returned to normal. He's a slightly thinner Elvis (fat/later yrs)
ritter89 8 months ago
Have loved U2 since before October. Love their covers (incl. Helter Skelter).
what is this crap. Happiness was one of John's best songs and maybe one of the reasons we all bought the white album in 1969. this has to be joke for some dance clubs minions who don't care about music, just a cool line and a repeated beat. sorry, I have to vomit now
mongo88now88 8 months ago
THANKS! asshole... My ears began to bleed as soon as this begun. Now I'm off to the hospital. U2 SUCKS!
BlackC13 8 months ago
Fuck you Bono. Dig a hole and bury your ego, you douchebag.
peepff54 8 months ago
U2 is a joke. Didn't anyone think this was actually gonna be cool?
173rdbobby1967 8 months ago
Ruined
bananarama471 8 months ago
brutal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mauricio1981 9 months ago
this is way too good!!! those who says that this is shit is cuz they dont understand music they just listen to songs but dont really enjoy music
manolomiausi 9 months ago
WHISKEY
TANGO
FOXTROT
?
biggray2 9 months ago
This is awful- i was just a little bit sick in my mouth.
kalilibird 9 months ago 2
interesting cover, why does bono look like robin williams? lol
dk3001 9 months ago
148 people don't like the beatles
fab186 9 months ago
terrible the tune the everything! i like u2 but this is crap
CanIHaveHalo 9 months ago
Shut up ! U2 areFANTASTIC!! and this version is very nice.. maybe alot diffrent then the original, but still they bring something new to the table!! VERY NICE
Ofekk1212 10 months ago
FUCK YOU
Felici003 10 months ago
I convinced most of you foul-mouthed folks knocking this song are not Beatles fans, most of them don't speak with such a fervor!
HughCarpenter 10 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
pure unadulterated shit don't fuck with a true classic .
ollie2sik 10 months ago
pure unadulterated shit don't fuck with a true classic
ollie2sik 10 months ago
I like this! It's hard to improve on any Beatles song but they did it. I like the hip hop beat and the rapping!
sloth85 10 months ago
@sloth85 You can't improve a Beatles song. Interesting cover but yeah sod off Bono
KatiaImeldaMarcos 10 months ago 5
And if you think U2 can't covering The Beatles songs,listen to there version of "Lucy in the sky with diamond" and you 'll never tell that anymore :p
TotoSoloRock 10 months ago
This is no really a cover,This his just a Joke,like "Dazed and confused" by Nirvana or "Another Brick in the Wall" by the Guns N Roses.
I love U2 and the Beatles.But I know U2 make some mistake beteween 30 years,they are human
TotoSoloRock 10 months ago
o i cant help it. i know this cover sucks and yes i know the original totally kicks ass, but hell, i fuckin fuckin love this tune! maybe its just because its u2 stuff that everyone seems to hate. they're just genius. everytime i just try to forget its a beatles cover. this is awesome
hellyfornication 10 months ago
the best band of all times
zakilaouira 10 months ago
bono, you did good in the movie leave it at that? please
Juggalotus713 11 months ago
Pretentious bs. The worst cover ever. And I like U2.
SirKevinH 11 months ago
lol i like how people just automatically hate it because its U2. i bet none of you actually formed a real opinion about it.
YaddahYaddahYaddah13 11 months ago 2
Comment removed
biker2101 11 months ago
Fuck you BONO
ThomRadioheadYorke 11 months ago
poo
fuck
que horrible!
israelcont 11 months ago
poo
israelcont 11 months ago
increible
35307585 11 months ago
i never ever thot id ever say this about a beatle song, but this is fucking terrible. bono is a lennon/mccartney wannabe.
TheDug0 1 year ago
i'm still saying it U2 R UNSKILLED
raysengan 1 year ago
I am a huge U2 fan. Not every recording is genius. This was ill conceived and produced.
DonFormica 1 year ago
I can't believe the hate there is for this song. I always liked it. I liked the dark psychedelia of this version. And that's what it is: a version. But then some Beatles fans seem to think the Beatles invented music itself.
AndPlus 1 year ago
@AndPlus , they actually invented it man
ThomRadioheadYorke 11 months ago
They treated this song as if it were a joke . Shame..,
Rockshift999 1 year ago
LOVE that U2 is never afraid to be different and do something "outside the box" AWESOME
McPiper1974 1 year ago
FUCK YOU¡¡¡¡
nimergas80 1 year ago
Quelle horreur!!!
ThePassiflore 1 year ago
WHAT THE HELL DID YOU DO TO A GREAT SONG?! SHAME ON YOU SHAAAAAAAAME!
LRUTool 1 year ago
I bet 'BO - NO' wanted to do this
I like U2 but they can be shit and try look so good about it
BandGravity 1 year ago
why did they do this? u2 is good they could have done better...
syaoran1990 1 year ago
Yes this truly sucks, but these guys are just a child band compared to the beatles
SaintInsanus 1 year ago
blech
MrAlphaPlus 1 year ago
Mother Superior
massimoblues 1 year ago
they fucked up the song
Cafetapuga 1 year ago
I have never heard anything so horrific in all my life.
Especially considering how brilliant the original song is.
MitchB930 1 year ago
i lasted 40 seconds-- thx for ruining a great song U2
doodeloo 1 year ago
Wow, U2 is really the best ...
In srewing with beatles songs!
marjoleinverboon 1 year ago
i like it, different bold, a different take
ledroses1985 1 year ago
yet another fuckn horrible cover
sasthrash666 1 year ago
err...Bono, better stick to charity, this shit ain't working.
clapphamjunction 1 year ago 2
Bono is horrible, has been for many years!!!
paranormal33 1 year ago
seriously, there's making something your own and then there's this garbage.
Petertunes 1 year ago
si, interessante .. ma dove minchia sono finite tutte le misure dispari che tanto mi piacevano?
cyrus2521 1 year ago
its like literaly raping the beatles song.....
originalbrodyg420 1 year ago 2
um granda nojo!!!
assassinonogoverno 1 year ago
se necesita ser tonto para echar a perder una cancion tan buena!! .. -.-
gopar10 1 year ago
fuck you bono
franciscocanton 1 year ago
fucking terrible
jnob 1 year ago
totaly SUCK!!!!
mendracipta 1 year ago
U-Poo!!!!
Trumuzicfan192 1 year ago
Awesome!!
SilvioJ 1 year ago
Oh, I get it. By gun, he means cock.
elwood127 1 year ago
Greatest band of all time? How about greatest posers of all time. These guys are a fucking joke.
elwood127 1 year ago
hell yeah this is shit bono suck dick big time!
Amizaun 1 year ago
Wow, even Across The Universe did a better cover.
leonel1993 1 year ago
I just found the best way to ruin this song. Here it is by U2
gentlejoker 1 year ago
don't get me wrong. i love U2 and all but they totally fucked up this Beatles tune.
captainkill1 1 year ago
terrible shit.
PurpleVolvagia 1 year ago 2
great rhythm and sound
pierotonolo 1 year ago
this is a fuckin great cover! it's completely different from the Beatles' one, but it fits perfect in U2 sound from Pop Era!
TheFly587 1 year ago
bono really like the beatles..
nogaisra 1 year ago
LEAVE IT TO U2 TO MESS UP A TOTALLY PERFECT SONG.....BONO....YOU SUCK!!!
armageddon2419 1 year ago
Quite horrendous. A good listening is the "B for Bang" cover i think.
jerste 1 year ago
pero q mierda es esa tanto c parten la madre esos welles para acer estas mierda i para transformar algo tan maravilloso d los beatles en algo d mierda d un grupo d mil conchas como U2 no mames
tavobeatle 1 year ago
Happiness would be a warm gun which just shot at my head in response to this terrible cover.
oth65 1 year ago
Why did you do this Bono? WHYYYY? I respect you as an original musician but your covers really stink...
bkev93 1 year ago
bang bang
westjoy59 1 year ago
Ach du Scheisse....... die sollten sich schämen für so nen Mist !!!
IamBlackMetal 1 year ago
this shit sucks
ovelonse 1 year ago 23
awful, bono. stick to the walrus
casurfer21 1 year ago 2
eh not as good as the Beatles or lennon to be more specific but at least theyre trying to bring the Beatles to more little youngins which i appreciate
icehouseproductions 1 year ago
pure shit.
Darkhartx1 1 year ago 29
@Darkhartx1 no it's not
RAAAAIIIIN 1 year ago
@Darkhartx1
This shit is awesome. hahaha
lucaslmgv 1 year ago
Playing random chords and throwing in a Beatles song for the title does NOT make it Beatles.
Cubkid05 1 year ago 2
this is so fucking bad
leariox9xxx 1 year ago 3
that was terrible
BeatleROxs 1 year ago 2
Vaya mierda
reptillius 1 year ago 2
I have to thank U2 if i know this song .This was their style all along the recording of POPMART.I believe they just wanted to let youngsters in their teens to get to know BEATLES music which i believe is a great cause to support
rjs21041959 1 year ago
I think this cover just ate a bit of my soul.
And not in a good way.
Neomoonqueen 1 year ago
bono is the record, breeders su jebali kevu ovoj stvari, a ti si govno
stosicsara 1 year ago
What the fuck is this?!?!?! i'd rather listen to a saudi arabian penny- whore take a shit in a porta-potty
dimebad 1 year ago
well, just read it: it's a mix and they were trying out something new...perhaps it didn't work out, but stop shitting around about Bono, he and U2 have dominated music for the last 25 years and with their influence for future bands to come!!
BonoVox1503 1 year ago
it sounds possesed
DaKing522RS 1 year ago
Ma vai a cacare...
Bucefalo909 1 year ago
Well...don't know why, but I really like it...of course the original es better, as it always is, but all in all, I like this one.
castillo4141 1 year ago
pff fuck you bono! :D
jviiermdza 1 year ago
@jviiermdza and fuck you too by the same occasion!
LondonUnderground186 1 year ago
vuvuzela button anyone?
IPARNASSUS 1 year ago
ya ni la chingas cabron, desgraciaste la rola vete al carajo
tlalion 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The single worst cover ever.
Mertdizzle15 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
U2 makes me puke
mtb416 1 year ago
you are make me feel shame to be a beatles fan...
i'm sure that lennon as a progressive and open minded songwiter would love this version!
this cover was a progressive experiment in the middle 90s. a beatles fan should respect it even he dosen't like it, as the beatles was quite experimental in the 60s as well.
music did not stuck in 1970 like you guys!
dlovas 1 year ago
Fucked it up.
skilledrussiankid 1 year ago
This cover fucking sucks,I hate U2 even more now just cause of what they did to such a awesome song.
whatsupbato 1 year ago
I can´t belive....aaaaarg...my ears my ears. they destroy the song.
microtorr 1 year ago
This version is way better than the Beatles version!
NotATrollSwear2God 1 year ago
@NotATrollSwear2God what the FUCK are you talking about??? he killed it!!
shadowdaemon96 1 year ago
@shadowdaemon96
Based on his name, he's obviously a troll, so just ignore him.
YoshiTheBlue 1 year ago
BASURA , MIERDA U2 CACA
z3ro2030 1 year ago
THE BEATLES VERSION IS WAY BETTER! WHAT WERE THEY THINKING?
valkrik 1 year ago 2
Yeah what the last guy said I guess, it's just too everywhere. The beat though is terrible considering it's a Beatles song... also Bono rapping is about as bad as Lil Wayne trying to sing "rock" music.
SoaringMuse 1 year ago
This actually isn't as terrible as you guys are making it out to be. It's got a good beat and Bono's vocals are decent-- it's just that it's very all-over-the-place and extremely hard to follow and pay attention to for a while.
RiRiLiscis 1 year ago
i love U2 but they've tried some weird crap in their day....
FeceMcGee 1 year ago
I really like this stuff...
ivanaD007 1 year ago
god i hate bono this remix sucks
x666pentagram666x 1 year ago
u2 is only fuckin steeling everything from the beatles
teringtostie 1 year ago
Bitch Mother! Its the Plastic BONO Band
Felici003 1 year ago 3
fucking U2.....
andthedominoes103 1 year ago
it´s a rape of the beatles
Pianolisticer 1 year ago
Good god
Horrayformusic 1 year ago
for that kind of reasons i hate u2 fuck you bono and all your mother fuckers ideas
charlesmudox 1 year ago
bono what have you done
Satiaraha 1 year ago 2
is it a mix? (I don't believe that u2 can be that bad). Someone say please where I can find the original cover:/
pyskute 1 year ago
oh no.... song raping
DavidGomezy 1 year ago
Atrocity.
Arenakan 1 year ago
I love U2, but this is wrong .. just wrong.
AhmedBadeeb 1 year ago 2
I dont know who decided Bono was so cool, but I really frickin hate this guy for some reason, The Edge should go out on his own get away from this loser band! Dont mean to be a hater, just got a right to voice my opinion and I'm gonna do just that.
Nexus079 1 year ago
Fuck U2 and Fuck Bono
jakepinkphloid 1 year ago
Yikes..I expected better.
azimuth457 1 year ago
this is terrible. They should try something new instead of destroying a work of art.
tremendasanata 1 year ago
Bono.. what the hell, man.
JaysThoughts 1 year ago
This cover sucks balls! I thought a band like U2 would have been more respectful of the classics..especially the Beatles repertoire......fuck you Bono!
rhoadsofoz 1 year ago
This is fucking terrible.
ghomicide 1 year ago
cool cover very different
90zosoman09 1 year ago
i need a fix. whatever that fix might be. talking about what might be... i gotta cover of this great song that i do not pretend to do justice to but i'd love your opinion and not mine. much love, amor, y paz
solargesture 1 year ago
This is shit.U2 are a shit band anyways they just know how to play the game,I'd rate Oasis as being a 100 times better then them and I would'nt even bother trying to compare them to the Beatles who are just the best there ever was and ever will be. U2 lovers don't start slaggin me off now im just being honest sure I'm from were they're from and I don't even know anyone who likes them
The Across The Universe actor's version is alright though!!!
BEATLES 4 EVER
jcollins32 1 year ago
The Beatles version ROCKS!
U2, taking a music of the greatest band ever, and making it a big SHIT!
From Brazil
felpics 1 year ago
Is this video official?
coincidoconmigo 1 year ago
Is The Beatles' version better? Well, yes, clearly. They were the ones who wrote it and they are the best band of all time.
This was the B-side to a song on U2's shittiest album, Pop. And the whole album was this kind of thing. I'm a huge~ U2 fan, but I never quite understood their electronic phase.
All that being said, this version is different, but it's not shite. It's pretty good, and there are a lot of covers that are worse.
annakitty7 1 year ago
this is disgusting. U2 should be put in jail for taking such a great song and turning it into this pile of pigshit
LennonRamone 1 year ago
u2 just massacred this song... Music has really gone downhill.
StabbyFork 1 year ago