I can kinda see what you are trying to do but just a few points. Female bonobos,have a very visable swelling when in full oestrus. Gorilla females do not have such visable swellings,so not sure how that fits with your gender hypothesis. Gorilla females also have quite a bit of choice in wether they stay with a silverback,it's not as controlling as it would first appear,they can quite easily transfer to another silverback. Male gorillas usually have to attract females, not coerce them.
Your comments section is rich with irony. This GeorgePaulDavisIII character embodies the stereotype of the youtube crank who feels the need to criticize every trivial aspect of someone's video posting.
You look like a person who can't be taken seriously. You look like a trend following kid. That makes it harder for the people who should listen to you to take you seriously. You're dressed in the appropriate shrouds to preach to the choir, but you will not be received well by anyone else.
If you're not speaking to educate efficiantly, what the hell are you doing?
not a cop-out, a summary of everything i already said and did not feel like repeating. i have reasons for my choices in life and they rarely have anything to do with pleasing strangers or abiding by societal norms.
No, they have more to do with purposely abandoning social norms. You dodged my point entirely and started talking about some straw man argument wherein you decided to address an issue that wasn't really presented.
Nevermind. This is why progress is so slow.
Have fun explaning things to people that they already know. Seems like a useful use of time.
you said my ideas were reasonable, but all of your criticisms have been about my appearance. if how i look prevents you from hearing my ideas, i don't really want to communicate with you anyway.
how's your progress? critical comments on old videos accomplishing something for you?
i'm satisfied with the positive responses i've gotten from my videos, though admittedly not with the quality of my videos.
They are about your appearance for good reason. Nobody but people who are "like minded" will be able to take the things you say seriously. This is a fact.
I can hear you ideas, but I already share them, on this topic, so I am irrelevant as far as goes your message.
The aesthetic quality of your videos is not as important as the aesthetic nature of your own appearance. Do you think if Dawkins looked like Ringo Starr he would have ever reached anyone who wasn't already onboard his Yellow Submarine of information?
the stereotype you perceive me to be "living" is in YOUR head. my choices are not made to fit some mold. if you have such concern about fitting in with the pack then you're the one living the stereotype.
do i really have to look like you would prefer to say something? do i have to for you to hear?
No,t's not in my head. it's in the world. If someone said "draw a male feminist" to a random guy on the street, they would draw a character very similar to you.
Understand that I was suggesting that you must look the way you look to be a part of your selected pack. I was not suggesting that you should change the way you look to fit in with some larger social pack.
However, looking less like an eighteen year old would probably help you get some of your messages to the correct people.
crap, did it again. why the hell do they put "remove" right next to "reply" with no confirmation? sigh, sorry for accidentally removing your note. i forgot yr name, warriorprince something. said there was absolutely no science to back this up.
I noticed some signs of sexism in your commentary. The most notable was your referance to gorilla "males" and gorilla "women". This is a common feminist linguistic practice.
ah, rather than using parallel terms? i noticed this too when watching the video, and it bugged me. wait, are you claiming i'm a FEMINIST!? teehee, i make that claim in another video.
yeah, i was trying to remember from about 8 years prior, sorry. i should have checked google earth before i started recording. oh well, geography was not the focus of the video.
I realize that you are only paraphrasing what you believe to remember from the exposition of the British study you mention, however, I am not quite sure how you can so easily posit that women are not aware of the probability of ovulation around 14 days prior to their next expected menstruation (from Latin for monthly). I think that this is pretty much the content of sex ed class that I remember from high school
certainly won't criticize your point. to clarify mine though, it is not apparent at the time. i can barely keep track of the days of the week myself, i doubt i would be tracking that two weeks out. then again if i bled regularly i might have a better sense of the months. other creatures (like baboons) have apparent and concurrent visual or scent indicators. the more important point too is that OTHER people who encounter a woman ovulating are unlikely to know her state in the cycle.
Yes, the importont point is that since there are no physiological visual signals these are proxied by cultural ones (I'm including clothing in culture).
To the question of common names: I believe that "chimpanzee" and "chimp" is now the convention for referring to the whole genus, Pan, to which both the Common Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the Bonobo (Pan paniscus) belong.
well, most of the photos that come up from a google image search for bonobo look just like that. my knowledge of bonobos came from an anthropology class i took many, many years ago, so it was lecture and not sexy nat. geo. vid.
too many gorillas in prison, bonobos deserve to run free on a hippie commune or something. i do love homosexuals, primarily because they have found themselves and overcome a pretty major societal "norm".
now if you stared reading this dont stop its really scarey!ok send this to five other videos in 143 minutes.When you are done press F6 and your crushes name will apear on the screen in big letters this is weird because it does work.If you break this chance you wont have a crush in the next five years
hey sadvipran, if you were a bonobo, you'd be getting trust from the females, because you are non-threatening and friendly. btw, are you sitting in a closet?
that's what the landlord called it. it's my cat's room, though. it's cleaner and more comfy than my room. it's a funny shaped space from converting the home into separate apartments.
um. i accept homosexuality, but that's not what i was speaking about. if you think bonds cannot be formed between beings without sex being involved you are either very bisexual or lonely.
I agree with you sad, but in the case of bonobos, as you already know, they DO engage in sex with all sexes. but, that doesn't mean that female alliances and friendly cooperation with other females is lesbian. bonobos are clearly pansexual in their behavior.
"pansexual" is a great word. i haven't seen much video of bonobos in the wild, but from what i've heard it sounds kinda like woodstock, (but with more fruit and less brown acid).
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. You will have sex with the nearest possible person Friday by the hate of your life. Tomorrow will be the worst day of your life. However, if your post this comment to at least 3 videos, you will be saved from the awful sex within 2 days. Copy and paste this to be saved
I like you!
Kypris88 8 months ago
WAT IS IS NOT THE BEES OH NO My eyes NOOOOOO!!!!!
lugnuts299 1 year ago
good video, interesting stuff
ps3jamesman666 2 years ago
I dig it man. Everything is cool with me even the facial hair!
Fing around whiteys neck
Reverseflush 3 years ago
I can kinda see what you are trying to do but just a few points. Female bonobos,have a very visable swelling when in full oestrus. Gorilla females do not have such visable swellings,so not sure how that fits with your gender hypothesis. Gorilla females also have quite a bit of choice in wether they stay with a silverback,it's not as controlling as it would first appear,they can quite easily transfer to another silverback. Male gorillas usually have to attract females, not coerce them.
gorillaphile 3 years ago
Your comments section is rich with irony. This GeorgePaulDavisIII character embodies the stereotype of the youtube crank who feels the need to criticize every trivial aspect of someone's video posting.
The irony is lost on him.
itheuser 3 years ago
Great video man
SpaceCarnivora 3 years ago
Haha, and if you weren't trying to appeal to strangers, you wouldn't have 161 youtube videos, ya' bonehead.
GeorgePaulDavisIII 4 years ago
more brilliant assumptions!
1) i could be making videos for family and friends
2) i could be making videos for myself
3) i could be making videos to waste time
4) i could be making a video hoping to meet like-minded people
i could probably go on, but again, i'm growing tired of this.
sadvipran 4 years ago
Your list of favorites and friends suggest that you are making them for relative strangers.
You do not make videos for yourself and then put them into a public forum. That is pretentious posturing.
If you are wasting videos to waste time, then hats off.
Why would you want to only hang out with like minded people?
GeorgePaulDavisIII 4 years ago
You cannot bury significant truths about the nature of human beings and how they respond to others under irrelevant philosophical cop-outs.
If you are just wasting time, fine. The other things you mentioned are obviously not true given the evidence of the situation.
GeorgePaulDavisIII 4 years ago
You look like a person who can't be taken seriously. You look like a trend following kid. That makes it harder for the people who should listen to you to take you seriously. You're dressed in the appropriate shrouds to preach to the choir, but you will not be received well by anyone else.
If you're not speaking to educate efficiantly, what the hell are you doing?
GeorgePaulDavisIII 4 years ago
being
sadvipran 4 years ago
That's a cop-out. And if all you're doing is "being," then your time is wasted along with your words. Seems like a lot of work for an empty gesture.
GeorgePaulDavisIII 4 years ago
not a cop-out, a summary of everything i already said and did not feel like repeating. i have reasons for my choices in life and they rarely have anything to do with pleasing strangers or abiding by societal norms.
sadvipran 4 years ago
No, they have more to do with purposely abandoning social norms. You dodged my point entirely and started talking about some straw man argument wherein you decided to address an issue that wasn't really presented.
Nevermind. This is why progress is so slow.
Have fun explaning things to people that they already know. Seems like a useful use of time.
Later.
GeorgePaulDavisIII 4 years ago
you said my ideas were reasonable, but all of your criticisms have been about my appearance. if how i look prevents you from hearing my ideas, i don't really want to communicate with you anyway.
how's your progress? critical comments on old videos accomplishing something for you?
i'm satisfied with the positive responses i've gotten from my videos, though admittedly not with the quality of my videos.
sadvipran 4 years ago
They are about your appearance for good reason. Nobody but people who are "like minded" will be able to take the things you say seriously. This is a fact.
I can hear you ideas, but I already share them, on this topic, so I am irrelevant as far as goes your message.
GeorgePaulDavisIII 4 years ago
The aesthetic quality of your videos is not as important as the aesthetic nature of your own appearance. Do you think if Dawkins looked like Ringo Starr he would have ever reached anyone who wasn't already onboard his Yellow Submarine of information?
Answer: No.
GeorgePaulDavisIII 4 years ago
Why does everyone with reasonable ideas--who are not professionals in a relevant field--have to look and sound like a smarmy hippie?
GeorgePaulDavisIII 4 years ago
i don't have to, i chose to. mmmm,smarmy...
sadvipran 4 years ago
Nah, you really kind of have to. It's pack mentality.
But, do you guys really have to talk about everything in that "I'm auditioning to be Plato" demeanor? Dude, "become impregnated?" Jesus.
Sure makes it suck for the rest of us who aren't living stereotypes.
You don't have to look like a Beetle to have something to say.
GeorgePaulDavisIII 4 years ago
the stereotype you perceive me to be "living" is in YOUR head. my choices are not made to fit some mold. if you have such concern about fitting in with the pack then you're the one living the stereotype.
do i really have to look like you would prefer to say something? do i have to for you to hear?
sadvipran 4 years ago
No,t's not in my head. it's in the world. If someone said "draw a male feminist" to a random guy on the street, they would draw a character very similar to you.
GeorgePaulDavisIII 4 years ago
Understand that I was suggesting that you must look the way you look to be a part of your selected pack. I was not suggesting that you should change the way you look to fit in with some larger social pack.
However, looking less like an eighteen year old would probably help you get some of your messages to the correct people.
GeorgePaulDavisIII 4 years ago
Matriarchy = PEACE
Patriarchy = WAR
SierraBloom 4 years ago
crap, did it again. why the hell do they put "remove" right next to "reply" with no confirmation? sigh, sorry for accidentally removing your note. i forgot yr name, warriorprince something. said there was absolutely no science to back this up.
sadvipran 4 years ago
where the bobobo i want bonobo !
iamthereallebowski 4 years ago
I'd tickle your ballsack with my tongue.
gremlinfeatures 4 years ago
Nice Cocain Scope Finger Nail Buddy
LordEli 4 years ago
I noticed some signs of sexism in your commentary. The most notable was your referance to gorilla "males" and gorilla "women". This is a common feminist linguistic practice.
ORCA4312 4 years ago
ah, rather than using parallel terms? i noticed this too when watching the video, and it bugged me. wait, are you claiming i'm a FEMINIST!? teehee, i make that claim in another video.
sadvipran 4 years ago
ok. your pointing out of the congo river is pretty crap. but ok your opinions are cute.
elchasai 4 years ago
yeah, i was trying to remember from about 8 years prior, sorry. i should have checked google earth before i started recording. oh well, geography was not the focus of the video.
sadvipran 4 years ago
Interesting.
I realize that you are only paraphrasing what you believe to remember from the exposition of the British study you mention, however, I am not quite sure how you can so easily posit that women are not aware of the probability of ovulation around 14 days prior to their next expected menstruation (from Latin for monthly). I think that this is pretty much the content of sex ed class that I remember from high school
I don't doubt the correlation, though.
Boycorrupted 4 years ago
certainly won't criticize your point. to clarify mine though, it is not apparent at the time. i can barely keep track of the days of the week myself, i doubt i would be tracking that two weeks out. then again if i bled regularly i might have a better sense of the months. other creatures (like baboons) have apparent and concurrent visual or scent indicators. the more important point too is that OTHER people who encounter a woman ovulating are unlikely to know her state in the cycle.
sadvipran 4 years ago
Yes, the importont point is that since there are no physiological visual signals these are proxied by cultural ones (I'm including clothing in culture).
To the question of common names: I believe that "chimpanzee" and "chimp" is now the convention for referring to the whole genus, Pan, to which both the Common Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the Bonobo (Pan paniscus) belong.
Boycorrupted 4 years ago
yeah, but bonobo's and chimps look like each other. I have seen movies with bonobo's, and there was said that it was a chimp.
laurens678 4 years ago
That photo is a chimp for sure, I have seen that picture before.
laurens678 4 years ago
well, most of the photos that come up from a google image search for bonobo look just like that. my knowledge of bonobos came from an anthropology class i took many, many years ago, so it was lecture and not sexy nat. geo. vid.
sadvipran 4 years ago
you rather be a bonobo? they love homosexuality.. there's also prison
2legit2quitz 4 years ago
too many gorillas in prison, bonobos deserve to run free on a hippie commune or something. i do love homosexuals, primarily because they have found themselves and overcome a pretty major societal "norm".
sadvipran 4 years ago
By the way, what does that chimp has o do with gorilla's and bonobo's?
laurens678 4 years ago
"that chimp" is in fact a bonobo, unless you are crazy enough to believe that a google image search can be wrong!
sadvipran 4 years ago
SOme of these comments really indicate the lack of intelligence in unintelligent people.
Sadvipran, very well spoken!
SierraBloom 4 years ago
He looks a bit stoned, he is also pointing the wrong places.
laurens678 4 years ago
i just like hugging my earth, wasn't the point of the video.
sadvipran 4 years ago
i strive to be more like a bonobo, too.
weggyrules 4 years ago
That's because you're a pussy!
jamestelfer 4 years ago
spoken like a scared silverback!
sadvipran 4 years ago
I'd rather be a silverback than a grubby bonobo!
jamestelfer 4 years ago
now if you stared reading this dont stop its really scarey!ok send this to five other videos in 143 minutes.When you are done press F6 and your crushes name will apear on the screen in big letters this is weird because it does work.If you break this chance you wont have a crush in the next five years
0H0Carlos0H0 4 years ago
hey sadvipran, if you were a bonobo, you'd be getting trust from the females, because you are non-threatening and friendly. btw, are you sitting in a closet?
2degucitas 4 years ago
that's what the landlord called it. it's my cat's room, though. it's cleaner and more comfy than my room. it's a funny shaped space from converting the home into separate apartments.
sadvipran 4 years ago
female to female bonds?? omg, just say it, they're LESBIAN/BISEXUAL, why is it so hard for people to accept that?
and of course women will know when they're ovulating without "knowledge", it's THEIR body! >.>
that70boy 4 years ago
um. i accept homosexuality, but that's not what i was speaking about. if you think bonds cannot be formed between beings without sex being involved you are either very bisexual or lonely.
sadvipran 4 years ago
I agree with you sad, but in the case of bonobos, as you already know, they DO engage in sex with all sexes. but, that doesn't mean that female alliances and friendly cooperation with other females is lesbian. bonobos are clearly pansexual in their behavior.
2degucitas 4 years ago
"pansexual" is a great word. i haven't seen much video of bonobos in the wild, but from what i've heard it sounds kinda like woodstock, (but with more fruit and less brown acid).
sadvipran 4 years ago
interesting, Thanks!
DougYorkNo1 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. You will have sex with the nearest possible person Friday by the hate of your life. Tomorrow will be the worst day of your life. However, if your post this comment to at least 3 videos, you will be saved from the awful sex within 2 days. Copy and paste this to be saved
sesarathor 4 years ago
cool i'm doing a project on bonobos now. bonobos totally rock!
garden0fgraves 4 years ago
it's fun to say 'bonobo' and it's fun to type 'bonobo' as well!
sadvipran 4 years ago
Very interesting points you bring up here. It was great listening to you.
brianreading 4 years ago
i'm so happy about how the loving comments totally outweigh the hateful ones. like 3:0, that's infinite love i think!
sadvipran 4 years ago