i did not know the sts was RWD i thout them like AL GORE had fuck all the american car co. off god bless the USA the RWD is alive fuck FWD.....fwd is for fagzz
xoxo, fwd with same size, power and weight never be fast as rwd, because of weight distribution (they are understeered) and traction (front wheels are unloaded at acceleration)
Yeah, yeah it would. I had a swapped 5.0L HO motor from a Mustang GT residing between the fenders, so I can definitely say "it....would've been a good one", if nothing else. The thing would lay rubber past 70mph on the highway, and I don't really think a CTS (aside from maybe the CTS-V) is doing that any time soon.
Awesome, bro! I absolutely LOVE that model year STS! It's one of my "affordable dream cars", right up there with a '93-'95 Ford Taurus SHO (5sp. , of course....) ;-)
yeah bro u have a northstar v8 of course its going to walk 5.0's my aurora does it with ease and the new sts's are only a half second quicker to sixty that ur sts and my aurora our 0-60 times r 6.5 vs. the new at lyk 5.9
don't sound like a v8
moneymikewaaz 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why would you do a lac like that
cthomas2020 1 year ago
why would you do a lac like that
cthomas2020 1 year ago
@cthomas2020 i agree
Chewy617 11 months ago
@cthomas2020 Im pretty sure he already stated its a rental.
KaeEssKlassik 10 months ago
Is this 6 cylinder or the V-8 Northstar ?
cslicer 1 year ago
Comment removed
colegraham 1 year ago
is that a v8?
BSheeena 1 year ago
yea it was a rental
gpgtp96 1 year ago
Please tll me this is a rental :(
2001LincolnV8LS 2 years ago
i did not know the sts was RWD i thout them like AL GORE had fuck all the american car co. off god bless the USA the RWD is alive fuck FWD.....fwd is for fagzz
cantgetright2012 2 years ago
That is far from stock. I think there is a compressor
arlingo 2 years ago
koffr ur a fag sevilles are some of the best cars out there and there hella fast off the line because of the fwd
HaloSpartan86 2 years ago
You kidding right... FWD is FTL.
holyjesuswashere 2 years ago
dude FWD are the worst off the line sry to say
traveler1969 2 years ago
they make front wheel drive cars so its better in snow, rain and ice.
BJJJPRODUCTIONS 2 years ago
true. come on handy then
traveler1969 2 years ago
they r great off the line. it just depends on the car.
rustynail1o2 2 years ago
@HaloSpartan86
xoxo, fwd with same size, power and weight never be fast as rwd, because of weight distribution (they are understeered) and traction (front wheels are unloaded at acceleration)
koffr 1 year ago
haha really.
this is like my dream car.
I just seen one like an hour ago.. 08 with spinners and ground lights that change from blue to green to yellow
mmmm ( L )
firefoxxx69 3 years ago
This car makes me wet.
firefoxxx69 3 years ago
yep, sure it would have!!!
gpgtp96 3 years ago
Pretty fuckin' lame, really. My old Crown Vic. would eat that thing alive.
revolutionday1 3 years ago
ur a fag ford sux
Rick4576 3 years ago 7
Hey dude, would you suck my fucker if I fucked your sucker?
revolutionday1 3 years ago
no, no it wouldnt
jsid7 2 years ago
Yeah, yeah it would. I had a swapped 5.0L HO motor from a Mustang GT residing between the fenders, so I can definitely say "it....would've been a good one", if nothing else. The thing would lay rubber past 70mph on the highway, and I don't really think a CTS (aside from maybe the CTS-V) is doing that any time soon.
revolutionday1 2 years ago
well its an STS... and i have a 94 STS that walks on 5.0s... im assumming the new sts's are faster then my 94
jsid7 2 years ago
Awesome, bro! I absolutely LOVE that model year STS! It's one of my "affordable dream cars", right up there with a '93-'95 Ford Taurus SHO (5sp. , of course....) ;-)
revolutionday1 2 years ago
yeah bro u have a northstar v8 of course its going to walk 5.0's my aurora does it with ease and the new sts's are only a half second quicker to sixty that ur sts and my aurora our 0-60 times r 6.5 vs. the new at lyk 5.9
wwebrody 2 years ago
I thought this car had front wheel drive.
muggicool 3 years ago
nope
gpgtp96 3 years ago
the old ones, when they called them sevilles, had FWD. new STS' are RWD
cbburtraw 3 years ago 2
is that ur daddys car
italnmobster142 3 years ago 2
which one the caddy?
gpgtp96 3 years ago
Nice rental from hertz...can see the barcodes on the windows
dec1184 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i got my cock sucked in this ride cuz
crannberry01 4 years ago
the burnout so easily, it sucks that all the older ones were fwd and not rwd like the new ones.
zain5505 4 years ago 2
i have fwd seville and it sucks. my next car must be rwd!!!
koffr 3 years ago 2
Yea they did a good thing by going to rear wheel drive. A manual option would be cool too.
adogg619 3 years ago
Check the CTS-V, which is a 6sp.
revolutionday1 2 years ago
hahaha, nice, not something your typical Cadillac driver would do.
Flabernat 4 years ago
jerk
dlccarlson 4 years ago
what?
gpgtp96 4 years ago
Did it have the Northstar V8?
psuedoleaderpain 4 years ago
yes
gpgtp96 4 years ago
nice car; what a stench though
thematrixexpert 4 years ago
Damn good cor a car you can just go out and buy. NICE
mikeb1444 4 years ago
Nice burnout. These things dont even break a sweat doing burnouts. Gotta love that northstar
beanjapan 4 years ago
you must have money or be real dumb to play with a brand new cadillac like that!
DSNCB919 4 years ago