when the our sun dies in 5000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 years will it b possible that humans can liv on another planet?(please note i havent got a clue how many 0s i put in)
no we couldn't terraforming mars would take a VERY long time but we could help out by Building massive factories speeding up Global warming and Planting A LOT of trees which use carbon dioxide to respirate and expel Oxygen
acually the solar system was suppost to be a binary star system. I bet that a lot of you dont know this but jupiter has all of the ingreedients to make a star but it is so cold and not heavy enough that it did not ignight
No one is even sure about what niburu exactly is...
Some call it a planet, some call it a brown dwarf star.. and I've even read from a pleiadian contact location that Niburu is now a kind of spaceship, re-constructed from an ancient inter-galactic war.....
There's just too much mis information about this.
Doesn't really matter anyway.
But about the binary star stuff, if Jupiter were a bit more massive it would collapse on itself and become a star.
thing is, our own solar system may have it's own companion star, but it is so far away, you can't sort it out of the other stars because of it's distance.
what about a sunlike star orbiting a supergiant at a greater distance? then a planet orbiting this star would be safe but the supergiant would still look big and bright enough to be regarded as a sun despite ist distance.
its possible... take a ps2 star wars battle front 2/1 (idk which 1 it is) and go to instant action. After make it mos eisley (soz for spell) then look in the sun. theres a glitch there too lol
I know. I set up an application I'm not supposed to name in a public forum made by a company named after a piece of fruit to render out all the final versions of the video. Most of the files were fine, so I didn't check the full-res version I used to upload here, and lo and behold, there was a render error in that one file. I decided that it was better not to delete and re-post, since that would have killed links and embeds, and deleted all comments.
Actually, from a terrestrial planet in Alpha Centauri, there would be two yellow suns and one red, smaller sun. But that red sun wouldn't be too significant.
even 4 stars orbiting each other is far from being that uncommon. I think behind the so-called Polar Star there's two binary systems orbitig one another. Our solar system is very, very simple by the average standard, which is probably the reason why it is suitable for life.
or maybe the sun never sets on a planet? the first sun would go down the horizon only to have a new star come up the opposite? so only twilight and dusk are possible.
by the way: the most interesting piece of science-fiction related to the topic of this video is "Nightfall" by Asimov and Silverberg. There a planet has no less than SIX suns of which at least one is always in the sky, so that there is never darkness. till some astronomers discover that there is going to be an eclypse soon which will plunge the planet in darkness, which will drive ppl mad and destroy civilisation...
I have a question for you. When a star, the size of our sun, runs out of hydrogen its core contracts and heats up so much that the "sorrunding shell" starts fusing helium to carbon, right? Well, this star is said to swell up and become a red giant. What I want to know is why the star becomes red? and why it's said to be much more luminous when in fact the star is cooling down? I thought that that the brightness of a star was directly correlated with its temperature.
I believe it's to do with in general, when fire or and intense heat source becomes starved of fuel. They go red. Try it with a normal flame... Although maybe not, I don't want you setting your house on fire lol
Thanks for the response. Actually, I asked my astronomy professor why it is that it turned red, and she said it was due to the temperature. Since the star cools down it turns red because red is a cooler color (according to the color specrum). I just forgot to ask her about the luminosity of a red giant.
Now I don't have to set my house on fire! LOL. I was really looking forward to it though. ^^
well the surface of a red giant is much bigger so that although a single square meter doesn't shine as bright as the one of a hotter star, the mass does it.
I believe that hotter could refer to both the core and the surface of a star. A star that is a lot more massive than the sun, fuses hydrogen into helium at a much faster rate as the temperature of the core is higher, and in turn the surface is hotter as well.
I agree with that. but since the higher fusion rate also results in higher inner pressure, which makes the star blow up, the surface paradoxically turns cooler. every piece of gas gets cooler when it is released into bigger space, for instance from a bottle into a room.
When you refer to a red giant -the act of expanding is what makes it cool down as gas particles have more room to move around. When a low mass star turns into a red giant it doesn't explode yet when a high mass star turns into a red giant it goes supernova.
When a star is born very massive the core indeed is very hot, and the inner gas pressure is higher than it would be in a low mass star; which is why the life spand of a "big" star is shorter than a "small" star.
So higher a higher fusion rate doesn't necessarily lead to a star explosion when a star is born massive. A massive star needs a higher fusion rate, and higher inner core pressure to counteract the force of gravity to keep from collapsing.
we are expanding very much on the original theme ;)
ppl interested in this broader astrophysical issue may look at the videos by doctordave (one of my subscriptions), especially the video "astronomy lecture - stellar evolution".
I guess we are;) I just took a quick look at the vid, and it covers interesting facts about the life cycle of a star, but it isn't any different from what I've been taught in my astronomy class. I wasn't sure what you were referring to when you said " higher fusion rate also results in higher inner pressure, which makes the star blow up" so I gave you what I thought was a decent response. Only massive stars blow up and become either neutron stars or black holes- it all depends on the mass.
I think I've got the answer to my own question. Could it be that the red giant becomes more luminous because hydrogen fusion is going at a much faster rate in the hydrogen shell? It's producing photons (particles of light) at a much faster rate than before.
Oh, and it turns red because it's cooling down. In the color spectrum red is a cool color as oposed to blue which is a hotter color. (OBAFGKM)
I wasn't sure why the red giant turned red because I was absent when they went over that in class, but I've read that chapter so I have a better understanding of it.^^
I've seen a few claims to that effect, but thus far no one has been able to definitively detect it if it's there. Since brown dwarfs are notoriously hard to find, it's possible, but most astronomers consider it unlikely.
what if a unknown gas planet was near a star at the exact same place as mercury and distance from the star will the solar flairs make the planet bigger after all its a gas planet
I would like to see an animation of the possible day lengths off a planet with two suns. If the stars are close to each other, I imagine it'd be like our days, but it must be irregular for far apart suns, right?
For the really close binary stars, the scene in Star Wars is actually a decent visualization. For the stars that are farther apart, the second star in the system would most likely just look like a very bright star in the night sky.
The short answer is that we don't actually feel speed. Everything on the planet is moving at the same speed as us, so relatively, it feels like we're all standing still. But if part of the earth suddenly moved in a different direction (like in an Earthquake), we'd feel that!
Can I Just correct something about this video, i watched a program on a documentary channel called "The Universe" and the information it gave me was relatively different to what this video tells you at 58-1:10, The bigger star off the binary stars don't always get all off it's matarial from the smaller star, the smaller star can be a white dwarf which gravity is so great around it, it literally sucks the life energy off the larger star, but the compression gets to much for the white dwarf...
That's correct. You'll notice she says "the more massive one" and not "the biggest one" because a white dwarf (which is what the animation shows) can easily be more massive than a larger main sequence star. If you watch the animation we used closely, you'll see that the material is going from the bigger star to the smaller one. (OK, it's not as clear as it could have been, but if we didn't re-use as much animation as humanly possible, we'd never put these things out.)
I learnt a lot from this video, reminds me of the time I found my first binary star or at least that's what it looked like from Earth. I know there are some that aren't true binary stars.
We actually cut out a section on figure-8 orbits for time. They're almost impossible to make stable, and the unstable orbit we illustrated is far more typical.
wow the woman is mutch inteligent in scients
TheBatSave 2 years ago 93
what a stupid video. of course they can! don't you see star wars?
Pikalikasq 2 years ago
very informative
TheMonolithicDonkey 2 years ago 101
tatooine had 2 stars....
megapraimturvo 2 years ago 52
wow Dr? Looks like A TEENAGER
mikebe41 2 years ago 60
On the movie 2010 Jupiter turned into a small star and earth had no darkness. My god it's full of stars!!
AtlantisCreations 2 years ago 14
yeah i got that one on dvd myself. my god it's full of stars. hal 9000.
starsandbarsforever 2 years ago 16
dr who?
BigLouieLittlePhilly 2 years ago
The planet tattoeine in star wars orbits a binary star system......
coopmen 2 years ago
when the our sun dies in 5000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 years will it b possible that humans can liv on another planet?(please note i havent got a clue how many 0s i put in)
lucydobbyn 2 years ago
scientists say they found water on mars and after 200 years we'll be able to live on mars
Pauliakas112 2 years ago
no we couldn't terraforming mars would take a VERY long time but we could help out by Building massive factories speeding up Global warming and Planting A LOT of trees which use carbon dioxide to respirate and expel Oxygen
0willbecome100 2 years ago 15
You were close, add about 6 more 0's and that should be a pretty accurate year for the sun to die. It'll be like Star Trek by then.
Ramel34 2 years ago
our sun dies in 5 000 000 000 years... .-.
h3llboy92 2 years ago
its actually going to die in 4-5 billion years
ILoveJyze 2 years ago 28
yes on
doctor who!
xMattyManu94x 2 years ago 2
i hate when i can easily tell when ppl are reading their script
SirSpoon84 2 years ago
parents can have more than one 'son' so why can't a planet? ;) tehe
ydaerdnatoh 2 years ago 2
Tattooine in Star Wars
favorites411 2 years ago
Star wars is fiction.
hyrael2 2 years ago
acually the solar system was suppost to be a binary star system. I bet that a lot of you dont know this but jupiter has all of the ingreedients to make a star but it is so cold and not heavy enough that it did not ignight
freshtrav97 2 years ago 5
1:35 She has no legs!!!!
phantomspellchecker 2 years ago 9
earth may have 1 soon. planet x
UnseenKnight 2 years ago
Silly.
mikelf77 2 years ago 2
No one is even sure about what niburu exactly is...
Some call it a planet, some call it a brown dwarf star.. and I've even read from a pleiadian contact location that Niburu is now a kind of spaceship, re-constructed from an ancient inter-galactic war.....
There's just too much mis information about this.
Doesn't really matter anyway.
But about the binary star stuff, if Jupiter were a bit more massive it would collapse on itself and become a star.
SNoRRo 2 years ago 4
The closest sun the Earth, Alpha Centauri is actually a 3 sun solar system.
So yeah It does have 3 suns .
Guard655 2 years ago 4
thing is, our own solar system may have it's own companion star, but it is so far away, you can't sort it out of the other stars because of it's distance.
boggy2411 2 years ago
This stuff is so interesting.
Kulawendin 2 years ago 13
i know
LoveStar127 2 years ago 2
did you know that VV cephei A is a binary star
well it is.
kalkinas1 2 years ago 3
lol I heard 3 sound effects from Microsoft Windows XPs Space cadet pinball XD
WormHorse17 2 years ago 2
Haha, I did too.
metaknightmares 2 years ago
what about a sunlike star orbiting a supergiant at a greater distance? then a planet orbiting this star would be safe but the supergiant would still look big and bright enough to be regarded as a sun despite ist distance.
revilo178 2 years ago
It's possible for a time, but supergiants blow up much faster Sun like stars.
DarkMuu666 2 years ago 2
wuld be too hot and idk how the gravitational pull wuld be like i can see how it can be like but idk
lithium2370 2 years ago
its possible... take a ps2 star wars battle front 2/1 (idk which 1 it is) and go to instant action. After make it mos eisley (soz for spell) then look in the sun. theres a glitch there too lol
halo3lite 2 years ago
Hey I got that game. Ill try it lol!
29sucks 2 years ago
Damn, me too.
sampj13 2 years ago
=P haha
¬¬¬¬
MapleStoryP 2 years ago
1,36 the legs are gone!
kelpokelp 2 years ago 19
I know. I set up an application I'm not supposed to name in a public forum made by a company named after a piece of fruit to render out all the final versions of the video. Most of the files were fine, so I didn't check the full-res version I used to upload here, and lo and behold, there was a render error in that one file. I decided that it was better not to delete and re-post, since that would have killed links and embeds, and deleted all comments.
SpitzerJim 2 years ago 13
It's gotta be impossible if a Planet had 2 suns.
The planet could easily burn.
BloodHuman3 2 years ago
it would still be a planet though...
aleclego 2 years ago
There can be live in fact, if the planet its too far away from theese stars the planet wont be that hot, it also depends on the size of these stars.
jaedcapo 2 years ago
Not if the stars are less massive than the Sun or if the planet is more distant for the primary star.
kpheider 2 years ago
yes it is posible
BobertThePieGuy 2 years ago
imagine 3 stars orbiting each other
tommybrett 2 years ago
Alpha Centauri A, B and C ;-)
revilo178 2 years ago
Actually, from a terrestrial planet in Alpha Centauri, there would be two yellow suns and one red, smaller sun. But that red sun wouldn't be too significant.
Ununennium119 2 years ago
even 4 stars orbiting each other is far from being that uncommon. I think behind the so-called Polar Star there's two binary systems orbitig one another. Our solar system is very, very simple by the average standard, which is probably the reason why it is suitable for life.
revilo178 2 years ago
or maybe the sun never sets on a planet? the first sun would go down the horizon only to have a new star come up the opposite? so only twilight and dusk are possible.
OUSOONERSFTW 2 years ago
theoretically it is possible. I think, morevoer, it might be the most common thing in the universe, since most systema have more than a single star.
revilo178 2 years ago
She looks like a man :P
LawOfLogic 2 years ago
wouldnt a planet in a binary system be rather radioactive? i meen ude need a very very good o-zone.
dahunterfromrune 2 years ago
there is a galaxy with a solar sytem whcih has 3 stars, interlocked in eachothers gravite
tehenvoked 2 years ago
yes, ours: the Alpha Centauri system (4,3 light-years away from the sun) consists of 3 stars ;-)
revilo178 2 years ago 4
by the way: the most interesting piece of science-fiction related to the topic of this video is "Nightfall" by Asimov and Silverberg. There a planet has no less than SIX suns of which at least one is always in the sky, so that there is never darkness. till some astronomers discover that there is going to be an eclypse soon which will plunge the planet in darkness, which will drive ppl mad and destroy civilisation...
revilo178 2 years ago
*into darkness
revilo178 2 years ago
interesting theory lol
imworthmoney 2 years ago
Ha, my comment failed.
;D
viramont90 2 years ago
The title is pretty stupid, every planet shares the same sun (star).
viramont90 3 years ago
you've got to be kidding me! Have you been asleep for the last 10 years. There are other planets besides the ones in our solor system!
adamco1999 2 years ago 2
I have a question for you. When a star, the size of our sun, runs out of hydrogen its core contracts and heats up so much that the "sorrunding shell" starts fusing helium to carbon, right? Well, this star is said to swell up and become a red giant. What I want to know is why the star becomes red? and why it's said to be much more luminous when in fact the star is cooling down? I thought that that the brightness of a star was directly correlated with its temperature.
QuietDesperation20 3 years ago
I believe it's to do with in general, when fire or and intense heat source becomes starved of fuel. They go red. Try it with a normal flame... Although maybe not, I don't want you setting your house on fire lol
Mavrik347 3 years ago
Thanks for the response. Actually, I asked my astronomy professor why it is that it turned red, and she said it was due to the temperature. Since the star cools down it turns red because red is a cooler color (according to the color specrum). I just forgot to ask her about the luminosity of a red giant.
Now I don't have to set my house on fire! LOL. I was really looking forward to it though. ^^
Thanks again!
QuietDesperation20 3 years ago
well the surface of a red giant is much bigger so that although a single square meter doesn't shine as bright as the one of a hotter star, the mass does it.
revilo178 2 years ago
"hotter" refers only to the surface, to be sure ;-) the core of a giant star is as hot as any.
revilo178 2 years ago
I believe that hotter could refer to both the core and the surface of a star. A star that is a lot more massive than the sun, fuses hydrogen into helium at a much faster rate as the temperature of the core is higher, and in turn the surface is hotter as well.
QuietDesperation20 2 years ago
I agree with that. but since the higher fusion rate also results in higher inner pressure, which makes the star blow up, the surface paradoxically turns cooler. every piece of gas gets cooler when it is released into bigger space, for instance from a bottle into a room.
revilo178 2 years ago
When you refer to a red giant -the act of expanding is what makes it cool down as gas particles have more room to move around. When a low mass star turns into a red giant it doesn't explode yet when a high mass star turns into a red giant it goes supernova.
When a star is born very massive the core indeed is very hot, and the inner gas pressure is higher than it would be in a low mass star; which is why the life spand of a "big" star is shorter than a "small" star.
QuietDesperation20 2 years ago
So higher a higher fusion rate doesn't necessarily lead to a star explosion when a star is born massive. A massive star needs a higher fusion rate, and higher inner core pressure to counteract the force of gravity to keep from collapsing.
QuietDesperation20 2 years ago
we are expanding very much on the original theme ;)
ppl interested in this broader astrophysical issue may look at the videos by doctordave (one of my subscriptions), especially the video "astronomy lecture - stellar evolution".
revilo178 2 years ago
I guess we are;) I just took a quick look at the vid, and it covers interesting facts about the life cycle of a star, but it isn't any different from what I've been taught in my astronomy class. I wasn't sure what you were referring to when you said " higher fusion rate also results in higher inner pressure, which makes the star blow up" so I gave you what I thought was a decent response. Only massive stars blow up and become either neutron stars or black holes- it all depends on the mass.
QuietDesperation20 2 years ago
probably my choice of words was not the best one. by "blow up" I meant "swell", not "explode".
revilo178 2 years ago
I think I've got the answer to my own question. Could it be that the red giant becomes more luminous because hydrogen fusion is going at a much faster rate in the hydrogen shell? It's producing photons (particles of light) at a much faster rate than before.
Oh, and it turns red because it's cooling down. In the color spectrum red is a cool color as oposed to blue which is a hotter color. (OBAFGKM)
QuietDesperation20 2 years ago
yes that's the ultimate reason why the giant star in the end casts mora light into space than a smaller one.
revilo178 2 years ago
I wasn't sure why the red giant turned red because I was absent when they went over that in class, but I've read that chapter so I have a better understanding of it.^^
QuietDesperation20 2 years ago
turns red because it cooled down
upupsteru 2 years ago
I imagined this kind of system being able to work a long time ago. Heh what's so hard about it?
EraofAwakening 3 years ago
who are you
guiliomcewan 3 years ago
isnt there supposted to be a brown dwarf orbiting our solar system (not jupiter/saturn)its suppost to be a pluto like orbit
tommybrett 3 years ago
I've seen a few claims to that effect, but thus far no one has been able to definitively detect it if it's there. Since brown dwarfs are notoriously hard to find, it's possible, but most astronomers consider it unlikely.
SpitzerJim 3 years ago 4
i thogut she was a man omg
goofy1071 3 years ago
nice
adsonkool 3 years ago
For the first half-second, I thought Carolyn looked like a 13 year old boy.
She could really pass as one.
ChomuSclavus 3 years ago
omg me 2!
Duhya 3 years ago
same here lol
SHGSFG 3 years ago
omg that's a girl?!
shaokan777 3 years ago
i love how you can tell she is reading her lines.
JuichiShichi 3 years ago
Primark clothes me thinks -- reminds me of Tatoo I and Tatoo II
wachmekillu 3 years ago
XD ROFL XD awsome pinball effects XD.
FLAME4564 3 years ago 2
Dr. Carolyn Brinkworth is flying!
superald1997 3 years ago
Didn't you know that astronomers have super powers? :P
SpitzerJim 3 years ago 22
of course they do... what an obivous fact how else do you think they get pictures of the stars?
pearcey77 3 years ago
yeah true cos' it wasn't 3d software
wachmekillu 3 years ago
Theres are flipping tons of binary stars. a good part of the bigger dippers handle consists of Binary stars. check it out yourself.
ganymedeIV4 3 years ago
Great video...so glad you posted it!
bradwatson7324 3 years ago
OMG , two civilazation on one solar system.
Either war or peace will happen.
zenniz1992 3 years ago
If there is a stable solitary system of 2 suns. Is 24 hours one day?
Taesu911 3 years ago
That would depend on the speed the planet rotates at...
SpitzerJim 3 years ago
what if a unknown gas planet was near a star at the exact same place as mercury and distance from the star will the solar flairs make the planet bigger after all its a gas planet
xxwillywankaxx 3 years ago
I would like to see an animation of the possible day lengths off a planet with two suns. If the stars are close to each other, I imagine it'd be like our days, but it must be irregular for far apart suns, right?
EmEmEmEl 3 years ago
For the really close binary stars, the scene in Star Wars is actually a decent visualization. For the stars that are farther apart, the second star in the system would most likely just look like a very bright star in the night sky.
SpitzerJim 3 years ago
0/5
rx7gl 3 years ago
1/5 -.-
TopazSkillMauler 3 years ago
Why can't we feel our speed if we go very fast around the oribt?
Gokas1746 3 years ago
The short answer is that we don't actually feel speed. Everything on the planet is moving at the same speed as us, so relatively, it feels like we're all standing still. But if part of the earth suddenly moved in a different direction (like in an Earthquake), we'd feel that!
SpitzerJim 3 years ago
same reason why you dont feel like you're going 500 mph in an airplane :) its moving at the same speed as you
Triple88a 3 years ago
the gravity
loveyougirl26 3 years ago
Yes, sorry spitzer i have watched it a bit more closely now, thanks for that lol.
chappo7777 3 years ago
Actually, I quite like hearing what isn't clear on a casual first viewing. It'll help us make sure we explain things better in future episodes.
SpitzerJim 3 years ago
In A supernova. Just Though You'd Like to know.. all information has been taken from the BBC program "The Universe."
chappo7777 3 years ago
Can I Just correct something about this video, i watched a program on a documentary channel called "The Universe" and the information it gave me was relatively different to what this video tells you at 58-1:10, The bigger star off the binary stars don't always get all off it's matarial from the smaller star, the smaller star can be a white dwarf which gravity is so great around it, it literally sucks the life energy off the larger star, but the compression gets to much for the white dwarf...
chappo7777 3 years ago
That's correct. You'll notice she says "the more massive one" and not "the biggest one" because a white dwarf (which is what the animation shows) can easily be more massive than a larger main sequence star. If you watch the animation we used closely, you'll see that the material is going from the bigger star to the smaller one. (OK, it's not as clear as it could have been, but if we didn't re-use as much animation as humanly possible, we'd never put these things out.)
SpitzerJim 3 years ago
I LOVE ASTRONOMY
WHAT A GREAT VIDEO
PEFANIS1 3 years ago 3
I learnt a lot from this video, reminds me of the time I found my first binary star or at least that's what it looked like from Earth. I know there are some that aren't true binary stars.
demonknight66698 3 years ago
Can a chick hide her boobs and look like a dude? Ask an astronomer.
noblerottt 3 years ago
apparently cause i thought it was a 15 year old boy until the end
forgettingheath 3 years ago
yeah me too lol
very interesting topic though
lostorfound19 3 years ago
this is amazing!
xXWatchinsumvideosXx 3 years ago
Thanks for sharing, you made me think about another civilization in our own galaxy, now would that be interesting.
redblueice 3 years ago
cool. keep em comming
lifewataniya 3 years ago
Thanks, All Your Videos Are Great. Keep Them Up :)
xThatSexyGuy 3 years ago 8
Thanks! We're trying to get more videos out!
SpitzerJim 3 years ago
excellent video !
5thElement15 3 years ago 7
Thanks!
SpitzerJim 3 years ago
haha I love the windows pinball machine sound FX they stole
pajamaninja367 3 years ago 3
Stole? ::blinks innocently::
SpitzerJim 3 years ago
haha stole is harsh, but it fit. =]
pajamaninja367 3 years ago 2
Man i thought that the planet would just orbit in a sort of 8 kinda orbit
Toonplayer08 3 years ago
We actually cut out a section on figure-8 orbits for time. They're almost impossible to make stable, and the unstable orbit we illustrated is far more typical.
SpitzerJim 3 years ago
firt view!
Malkas578 3 years ago