I think the basic idea with the "public option" is that first of all it would potentially be cheaper because the numbers of people covered by it could potentially give it enormous bargaining power.
The govt could say to doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, if you want our business we want low prices, much like the way Walmart for example can get the lowest prices from manufactures because of the quantity of product purchased.
In addition the public option would be cheaper because it wouldn't need to spend money on advertising, lobbyists, and it wouldn't be a for profit enterprise.
The money it saves would also allow it to offer subsidies for low income people, and cover people when they change jobs, and possibly (this is a contentious proposal) if they have pre-existing conditions, or are temporarily unemployed.
It is also expected that because the public option will be inexpensive that private sector insurance companies will need to lower their prices as well in order to compete.
The argument against it is the typical pro big business argument, which to be fair isn't entirely without merit. Prices paid for medical treatment could possibly be driven so low that the health care industry would spend less on R&D, and insurance companies could go out of business.
I find it kinda funny that my own view of this video is the 420th view... LOL
eagleeye1975 2 years ago
Damn, this chick is like a new age hippy.
gworksnell 2 years ago
hmmm, while england becomes more like america, america becomes more like england. gee, i wonder what could possibly be going on there.
Richy0326 2 years ago
you need fckin health care hehe
jfeuiebf 2 years ago
Drinking or not, pretty damn cogent! Thanks for your views.
ICELANDIC1 2 years ago
Great vid, thanks for the input worm. I will attempt to read the bill. Wish me luck, I am a virgin in this regard. lol
Suorrel 2 years ago
HEY TJ!
fuck you =)
achampag 2 years ago
oh i forgot,
SELLOUT BITCH
(hehe night worm)
achampag 2 years ago
the balls on you...admitting sold drugs huh? damn.
that alone causes awe
achampag 2 years ago
why?
elfred1980 2 years ago
I think the basic idea with the "public option" is that first of all it would potentially be cheaper because the numbers of people covered by it could potentially give it enormous bargaining power.
The govt could say to doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, if you want our business we want low prices, much like the way Walmart for example can get the lowest prices from manufactures because of the quantity of product purchased.
(cont)
TheNakedAtheist 2 years ago
(cont)
In addition the public option would be cheaper because it wouldn't need to spend money on advertising, lobbyists, and it wouldn't be a for profit enterprise.
The money it saves would also allow it to offer subsidies for low income people, and cover people when they change jobs, and possibly (this is a contentious proposal) if they have pre-existing conditions, or are temporarily unemployed.
(cont)
TheNakedAtheist 2 years ago
(cont)
It is also expected that because the public option will be inexpensive that private sector insurance companies will need to lower their prices as well in order to compete.
The argument against it is the typical pro big business argument, which to be fair isn't entirely without merit. Prices paid for medical treatment could possibly be driven so low that the health care industry would spend less on R&D, and insurance companies could go out of business.
TheNakedAtheist 2 years ago
I like you worm. I was just trying to force my will on fakesagan just for a moment.
oldhacks 2 years ago