Added: 2 years ago
From: AlexJones2012
Views: 17,521
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (178)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ron Paul 2012

  • OBAMA IS THE 44TH AND LAST PRESIDENT, THEN AFTER AMERICA WILL ANOTHER; CALLED THE AMERO: CANADA, MEXICO, USA...

  • Paul

    He has never voted to raise taxes.

    He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.

    He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.

    He has never voted to raise congressional pay.

    He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.

    He voted against the Patriot Act.

    He voted against the Iraq war.

    He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.

    Reg REPUB to vote in primary in all states

  • We need him to win. Everything that is good and decent that has been established in this country up to this point is riding on it.

  • we must win.the most important election ever.we are smarter than they are, and so we shall prevail.Hail to Paul!

  • I'm from Ireland living just south of Dublin in town called bray and I've decided to do what i can from here I dont care what people say I'm gonna get ron paul stickers for my car and all family!!! gonna do what i can for all the americans over here!!!!!RON PAUL 2012!!!! it's gonna happen he is the first step in this global awakening!!! you can feel it can't you!!!!! I know I can and I don't even live in America!!!!

  • Ron Paul draws support from across the political spectrum, meaning that he is the only candidate that is sure to beat Obama. Ron Paul unites Americans instead of dividing us into left-wing and right-wing camps. Our unseen enemies want us divided. We the People stand UNITED behind RON PAUL !!

  • in what respect charr lee

  • Have you registered Republican yet? if you don't register 7 weeks before the primaries you'll not be able to help Ron Paul win.Everything you have said or done to help Dr.Paul will be for nothing if you can't vote for him.So I suggest if you care about getting him elected you take an hour to go and register,take the family and friends that wish to vote.PLEASE COPY AND PASTE THIS MESSAGE ON EVERY RON PAUL VIDEO RIGHT NOW.SPEND 15MINS PASTING,READY GO.

  • Obama will win in 2012. He's already ahead in the polls here easily against any republican. Ron Paul can't beat him here.

  • California Republican Party 9/17/ 2011 Straw Poll Full Results: Congressman Ron Paul (374, 44.9%).. Governor Rick Perry (244, 29.3%).. Mitt Romney (74, 8.8%).. Congresswoman Michelle Bachman (64, 7.7%).. John Huntsman (17, 2%).. Herman Cain (15, 1.8%).. Newt Gingrich (14, 1.7%).. Thad McCotter (7, 0.8%).. Rick Santorum (7, 0.8%).. Gary Johnson (2, 0.2%).. Fred Karger (1, 0.1%).. Write-Ins (15, 1.8%).. Veterans GOP support: Ron Paul 71%, Cain 13%, Romney 8%, Bachman 5%, Other 3%.
  • @variablestatus paul for prez

  • @variablestatus Have you registered Republican yet? if you don't register 7 weeks before the primaries you'll not be able to help Ron Paul win.Everything you have said or done to help Dr.Paul will be for nothing if you can't vote for him.So I suggest if you care about getting him elected you take an hour to go and register,take the family and friends that wish to vote.PLEASE COPY AND PASTE THIS MESSAGE ON EVERY RON PAUL VIDEO RIGHT NOW.SPEND 15MINS PASTING,READY GO.

  • Militantpatriot com

  • Just bomb iran.

  • Comment removed

  • Oh God , please don't let her be in the presidential race for 2012 . We have enough dumb candidates already in the race . Go Ron Paul 2012 ! Remeber to reg. REPUB so your vote counts in every state ( in the primary )

  • If you cherish America and freedom, Barack Obama 2012.

  • @syzygy502 Ummm...no! If you really cherish America and freedom, Ron Paul 2012!

  • @kusokosla No, what I'm saying is that he can't win enough states to win 270 electorate states.

  • @syzygy502 There is no reason he can't unless people like you don't vote. GET OUT AND VOTE AND HE WILL WIN.

  • @foreverisalie713 I'm not voting for him because he's racist and will destroy America.

  • @syzygy502 um....america is being destroyed and HE wants to stop it. You should read more.

  • @syzygy502 Ohio and Florida will go Ron' way ..2 out of 3 west coast staes will go Ron's way...and one of them could be California! So, I am sure if Ron wins Claifornia and Florida apart from the other conservative staes he is sure to win presidency!

  • @LORDOFWARS8 Ron Paul will never win. He would ruin our country if he did.

  • @syzygy502 Really?! And how exactly that will happen when Ron wins?

    What I see that he will truly bring back the glories of America back ... glories= no debt, no illegal wars, no un-patriot act, least amount of tax, more personal freedom, less bureacracy/govt. and hence more small business, no drug wars, zero inflation ... and the list goes on

  • @LORDOFWARS8 If Ron wins, then we will have corporate puppets running the show, less government, illegal wars against the blacks, racist policies toward making blacks slaves again, do nothing for small businesses and escalate the war in Afghanistan and Libya as well as revive Iraq War for his defense contractor buddies.

  • @syzygy502 illegal wars against blacks? black slaves? ...and thats why he receives the most support from blacks among Republicans ...more than Herman Cain actually ... do nothing for small business? thats why he is voted the "taxpayers" friend from small businesses year after year! escalate war? u must be kidding! someone who has voted against any illegal war throughout 35 years ..even so called peace loving Dems voted for those wars ... the lone candidate to vote No for "forcing" democracy

  • @LORDOFWARS8 More votes than any other republican? How much is that? 5%. You are sadly mistaken about this world.

  • IF YOU CHERISH YOUR FREEDOM, VOTE FOR RON PAUL!!

  • Remember he has to win the majority of electorate votes. Since he's a republican, he'll never win.

  • Ron Paul hot dot com....

  • Last I checked, winning a plurality in the popular vote doesn't mean you win the election

  • @iNeedBeat it's too bad that 's true because I think ROn paul might win if popular vote were the method of determining election .

  • @doogleandalix He will win ... no matter what ever the method! First things first, please do not forget to register with republican party to vote in the primaries ....

  • @LORDOFWARS8 You are preaching to the choir here - I have been posting the Register REPUB for closed primary states daily for months now :) And I have offered to assist anyone with help changing their party affiliation or needing help registering ,etc. I will do my best to see Ron Paul get elected ,that's a given .

  • BUSH SIGNED A LAW THAT SECRETLY ALLOWS PRESIDENTS TO HAVE POWER OVER THE OTHER TWO BRANCHES. Our founding fathers knew tyranny would occur if separation of powers is lost... ALL OTHER PRESIDENTS WHO DO NOT SUPPORT FREEDOM WILL DEGRADE OUR LIBERTY AND SHRED OUR CONSTITUTION.

    VOTE RON PAUL 2012.

    Spread the word and post everywhere if you want to keep freedom! He will restore our constitution and rights!

  • Paul!!!

  • RON PAUL 2012

    THE PATRIOTIC AMERICANS ONLY LOGICAL CHOICE

  • I vote for the NWO in 2012

  • His world view? Are you freaking serious! Why don't you get back to coach and break out the peanuts the people are getting hungry, also the captain told me to tell you to stop annoying the passengers, wev'e had several complaints!

  • 100 years without any major change in the political pool is bad for any country's health. This election pick neither Republican or Democrat.

  • @junkers1337 Ron Paul

  • Comment removed

  • You apparently think that the end justifies the means. And you think that it's okay that Japanese were hanged for waterboarding US soilders in WWII? Sorry, but torture has been illegal for many, many decades.

    "...Civil War, Lincoln made it clear that although war is inherently brutal, torture and cruelty had no place in a morally superior society. Indeed, the world has time and again reiterated the dictum that torture of any type is forbidden and prosecutable under the Geneva Convention..."

  • @darthtalon1984 .

    Google: McCain: Japanese Hanged For Waterboarding

    .

    Republican presidential candidate John McCain reminded people Thursday that some Japanese were tried and hanged for torturing American prisoners during World War II with techniques that included waterboarding.

    .

    "There should be little doubt from American history that we consider that as torture otherwise we wouldn't have tried and convicted Japanese for doing that same thing to Americans,"

  • @darthtalon1984 .

    We are supposed to be a nation of laws. It isn't moral or legal that we do what ever we want just because we can. The idiots in the w/cheney administration decided that they were above the law. They should be prosecuted not just for permitting torture but for the needless deaths of hundreds of thousands in Iraq.

  • @ReduceGHGs They should be prosecuted for the unconstitutional wars in Iraq the Patriot Act water boarding the list goes on.

  • @mrhnm .

    It's amazing that we hung people for water boading in WWII but w/cheney justified the practice.

    Hard to believe they are going to get away with it.

  • @darthtalon1984 .

    Waterboarding is not effective AND it is a crime. Review history.

    .

    "After World War II, we (the Allies) convicted several Japanese soldiers for waterboarding American and Allied prisoners of war. ... Leading members of Japan's military and government elite were charged, among their many other crimes, with torturing Allied military personnel and civilians. The principal proof upon which their torture convictions were based was conduct that we would now call waterboarding."

  • @King100Joe .

    Seek help. Just do it elsewhere.

  • @King100Joe .

    Most scientists have low IQs? I'll read no further. Funny kid! You must have missed the bus.

    I'll filter your silly posts out.

  • @King100Joe .

    Great. Go have your "ideas" elsewhere.  Who cares but you.

  • @King100Joe .

    Children! Isn't it past your bedtime or didn't you miss the buss, or something?

    Get away with your silly adolescence.

  • The ground floor is that potential policy makers like ron paul would choose to put in jeopardy the health and safety of our descendants. Science has clearly demonstrated that habitability will degrade further unless we address the very real problem of climate change.  Here's a good short film that discusses some of the roots of why so many people have been lead into thinking that there's still a credible debate over the core issue.

    Google: The Denial Machine Video

  • @King100Joe .

    Lots of volume but not much of substance. Sounds like you read or watch too much science fiction. Maybe your head is all too often into video games. Mostly you just lack information and are frustrated that you don't understand what I was talking about. But if you are unwilling to learn I can't help you. The link I provided was for your benefit. Now for your benefit… read, learn, grow, and contribute.  Or be content babble nonsense, again.

  • @King100Joe.

    To understand why a Carbon Tax or Cap & Trade it will required you will need to research what negative environmental externalities are and how we need to adjust the business model to take them into consideration.

    Try reading the paper at the following link then get back to me with a more informed perspective.

    Google: environmental externalities dr.u. sankar

    That is, if you want to learn. If not, sorry I can't help you.

  • @King100Joe .

    Sorry, first impressions were more than enough. Your post was given DUE consideration.

  • @King100Joe .

    I read the first two words of your post and desided that was enough.

    If vulgarity is all you have to offer, don't bother. It's a reflection of its source and too ugly for me to bother with.

    Sure hope you can do better.

  • I don't know about Ron Paul "saving" the world, but he sure as hell can change America's image in the world. But he can't do it alone. He'll need major support from Congress to get things done, which is why I think it's time for the ordinary citizens in all 50 states that agree with his views to run for Congress. And since Sen Luger of Indiana is retiring, I just might be the first to help get this country I love back on track. I wouldn't ask for money (though it helps). I would ask for votes.

  • RON PAUL will never be president. Very simple. He wants to federally control prostitution, doesn't want to federally control ANY types of drugs (weed, cocaine, heroine, etc.), he wants to get rid of the department of education, and basically wants to take all federal power away. I am not saying I hate him, but he will never be voted president for those reason, it is dilusional to think otherwise but good luck anyway.

  • @C1Era I get why it's hard to comprehend the things you listed about Ron Paul, but when you take a closer look at his foreign policy and economic principles, all your doubts should clear away. Thanks for the good luck anyway, for the fate of not just the US, but also the whole world depends on it.

  • @DaveBlackism I think he has an extremely good foreign policy, but again he probably won't be elected. Also, I know it is a serious matter but you are getting a little bit ahead of yourself saying the world depends on it. We will see in four years (he won't be president) and you get back to me on how the world is doing. (You really lose credibility by saying th fate of the world depends on ron paul, just syaing)

  • @C1Era I'm not exaggerating, it is what it is. The most powerful country in the world with a president like Ron Paul will save the world.

  • @DaveBlackism Why do all Ron Paul fans think this? IF you asked him yourself, he would say that he is not going to ''save'' the world. I gaurantee it.

  • ron paul is not in touch with reality. He reject's science. He said he doesn't accept evolution and he called global warming a hoax! Who in their right mind would support anyone that is so out of touch? Probably about as many as supported him last time.

    Sorry rp, despite the few good ideas that you do have there are far too many bad ones. And take palin with you!

  • @ReduceGHGs MAN MADE global warming is a hoax. the planet warming is a natural process, it happened b4. plus there is a polar shift coming soon which might contribute to the weather we are having imo. i dont think there is an exact date yet for the shift.

  • @doublexnchuck .

    Hoax? Where's your evidence. I rely on the most respected scientific institutions there are. Try reading what NAS and AAAS have to say. For that matter, read what they all say!

    Here's a site with links for further research.

    Google: Scientific Opinion on Climate Change Wiki

  • @ReduceGHGs we emit such a small fraction of co2 compared to the ocean. they say we are making a huge impact on the global temp but we are actually doing very little. do i think we should continue using fossil fuels. HELL NO!! we need to start using hemp for fuel which is clean burning. 1 acre can make 10 tons of fuel or 3030 gallons of fuel every 4 months

  • @doublexnchuck .

    Why are you trying to play scientist? What makes you qualified to say we are having little effect? Since you don't have the necessary education and training to grasp the very complex climate sciences it's better to rely on our historically reliable scientific institutions.

    Try the link I suggested and learn what the current state of the science has concluded.

  • @ReduceGHGs it doesnt take a genius to notice a pattern in climate change. ill pm you the link

  • @doublexnchuck .

    You are right that it doesn't take a genius. It does take a lot of education and training to develop a sufficient foundation to know even where to begin.

    Based on the souce you provided, you either lack research skills or willingly cater to vested interest propaganda.  The coal industry is not a reliable source of info on climate change. Do some HONEST research.

  • @ReduceGHGs Do not bother with ReduceGHGs, he doesn't represent Ron Paul. I'm a fan of Dr. Paul and I think the global warming discussion should be left to the scientists only. After all it is a debate of science. But by turning Dr. Paul down just because he is a Christian is unfair. You must understand that almost all the politicians are Christians. Some would even have to lie about being Christianity so people would vote for him. BTW even Bill maher supported him, what more do you want?

  • @DaveBlackism.

    YES, it sure is correct to say I don't represent ron paul!

    Those that hold positions that set policies and establish regulations should have a firm grip on reality. It would be irrational to elect someone that rejects the best science available as it wouldn't be in our best interest. If he disavows climate change he won't make the necessary changes to deal with it. It has NOTHING to do with his religion. Obama is Christian (fact) yet he accepts evolution & human-caused GW.

  • @ReduceGHGs Global Warming is a global problem. Only by solving our foreign issues first, can we truly start treating global warming. What Ron Paul is trying to do is befriending every nation in the world and talk about things instead of war. Even Bill Maher won't reject him, I don't get why you have to be so stubborn. Just trust me, we end the war first, make peace with the world, stable the economy, then global warming will be solved easily through cooperation with our friends.

  • @DaveBlackism Sorry, climate change won't wait for us to fix our foreign issues. (By the way, they are NEVER fixed.)

    We are already 30 years late on getting started on reducing our emissions. It is already very late. The longer we wait for other problems to be "fixed" the more our habitat will deteriorate. With someone like RP in charge you guarantee that no policies will be set to address a problem that he doesn't believe exits. He rejects the science, the reality, the future generations.

  • @ReduceGHGs First of all, you sounds like you don't know who Bill maher is, you should youtube him, he talks almost like you, you will like him i promise. also I think you have the false impression that US is the only country in the world. If US make some policy about global warming, it will only impact the Earth in a very small scale. The only way to make up for those 30 years of time we wasted is to ask every nation in the world to lend us their power.

  • @DaveBlackism .

    And yes, of course it will take global emission reductions, not just here in the US. But it is the "West" that is responsible for most of the pollution in the atmosphere and we have benefitted the most from our polluting activities. We have the flexibility to change our ways and lead the other countries to cleaner activities. Aren’t our future generations worth the effort? Consider it a matter of self-preservation. That's just what it is.

  • @ReduceGHGs Saving our future generation is exactly what I'm trying to do here.

  • @ReduceGHGs BTW, you make Ron Paul sound like a Christian nut. he's certainly not. He stated that he stands strongly with freedom of religion. That includes non religion. So Atheists such as you need not worry. Just follow the logical thoughts of yours when listening to his debates. You will see that Ron Paul's policies is actually strongly based on logic, not his personal opinion on religion.

  • @DaveBlackism .

    Did I make RP sound like a Christian nut to you? Sorry, that was not my intention. It is a fact that he rejects the well established science of evolution and climate change. Where is the logic in that? How can anyone rationally defend these beliefs? So he just "believes" that the fossil record is wrong. So he just "believes" that 30 years of global scientific research on climate change is wrong? I prefer a leader that understands reality based on the evidence.

  • @ReduceGHGs It doesn't matter what his religious opinions are, it only matters what he does about his religious opinion. Ron Paul's opinion on religion has zero impact on his policies, so there is no point of arguing about this at all. In fact, you should focus on the more important stuff, like our country is destroying the world and us with the constant war.

  • @DaveBlackism

    I don't care what his religious opinions are. ron paul's opinion on climate change DOES matter. If he doesn't accept the science that humans are warming the planet he won't establish policies and regulations to deal with it. THIS is the important stuff. Without a healthy habitat, cultures fail, people suffer. Since our future generations will be all that's left of us, consider it a matter of self-preservation. ron paul just doesn't get it.

  • @ReduceGHGs Like I said, US is just one out of the hundreds of countries in the world, by establishing policies about global warming in the US will only impact the Earth in a very small scale. The whole world needs to be in on this. Once the war is over and nations in the world are friends again, can we truly take back those 30 years of waste of time.

  • @DaveBlackism .

    Yes, the US is one of many countries, but it has contributed MORE than any other country. We have the ability to lead the way or would you rather wait until our habitat deteriorates, cultures fail, and people suffer before acting? To say "I'm not doing it because no one else will do it." is not only childish, egocentric, and irrational, it is most certainly NOT in our best interest. We can and must change. Like I said, it's a matter of self-preservation.

  • @ReduceGHGs Ron Paul has stated that he wants to slow down the emission and stop subsidizing the big oil company on that Bill Maher show. BTW you still haven't replied about that, you should check him out. Also I'm all for the global warming, we just have diffident methods of helping it. I think by stop dropping thousands of bombs on other countries for their oil is the way to go. And yes, US do contribute a lot to the greenhouse effect. But it's still only one fifth of the world.

  • @DaveBlackism .

    ron paul said global warming is a "hoax". Hear him say it on YouTube. So why does he want to slow emissions? It's because he knows his position on the science is untenable so he's hedging his bets. Sorry paul, ya can't have your cake and eat it too. I'm glad he's for ending subsidies for big oil. He's definitely got some good monetary and foreign policy ideas. Too bad he missed the boat on too many other issues.

    Per capita, we emit FAR MORE than other countries.

  • @drummer8787 actually, it was founded as a democracy

  • @TheBashku Really!?  Do youknow how the founding fathers defined democracy? Lets talk more when you find the answer!

  • Comment removed

  • ill bet electoral college comes in and votes obama even though majority voted paul.

  • It's hard to have respect for anyone who cannot prove beyond a doubt that they are even citizens or even know it’s real name. F -Y- Obama, Barry or whatever is your real name who sells out AMERICAN WORKERS over seas . Boycott Chinese goods buy AMERICAN support AMERICA and don't support communist slave labor.

  • whatever.......chemtrails (aluminum,barium,strontium...J­UST LOOK UP....NOT NOW STUPID...WHEN YOU GET OUTSIDE>>>UP IN THE SKY) will leave you dead before ron paul is assasinated

  • And why people who want to buy cannabis MUST intercourse with a mafia, thereby putting themselves at risk and are wary of police persecution? Is it not better if they ACQUIRE Cannabis special place by the State. Where are DIRTY MONEY? Why ordinary people can not engaged in this business, plant seeds, watered, grow, harvest, delivered to the state and thereby earn a living CLEAN MONEY.

  • shamestream media been rufusing to admit ron paul is the man i been seeing what a sham he is clearly THE FRONT RUNNER FOR 2012!

  • Did you see the internet poll of countries from all over that showed that  Ron Paul was destroying the competition before "the election" the appointment. Good post AJ Twenty 12.

  • this is a ridiculous and laughable "projection" I hope this is a joke.

  • Palin is just a puppet. shes being put up just so the people can feel like they actually changed something. Just like Obama..... change change change change change. what were ya gona change?? oh um cant say. everyone all over the world thought that the US was making a turna round with Obama and it might be the same with Palin.

  • I think if Barack wins it will be the begining of the end times.

    Also if Ron Paul wins wouldn't he be assassinated like JFK?!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @vi2ua1ize1 Yeah, there is no way to win. Ron Paul would be assassinated before he could end the FED or disrupt the military industrial complex.

  • @zOMGLaserGunzPewPew Though I'm cynical about it, if it were to happen, I'd hope it'd be pretty ****ing obvious to the public who the people are behind it, you know?

    Anyone with a mind, heart, and soul can be pushed to revolution should the cause be right and the facts too obvious to ignore. An assassination is obvious - let's just hope that in that case, most of America proves itself to have heart, mind, and soul after all. 

  • Assasinating Dr. Paul is not a good idea. Just saying. Not a good idea at all for the people thinking about it.

  • @hockeyslade The type of people who would assassinate Ron Paul if he became president are not people who have Youtube accounts, or even care about the opinions of peasants as low as we.

  • @hockeyslade if that ever happens, i'll give the killer as much of a slow and painful death i can think of.

  • I would LOVE to see a third part candidate gain prominence in 2012 and perhaps even win the presidential election. Some people may say that is far-fetched, but more and more and more people are growing disenchanted with both major parties and they want a REAL change (with real substance). I voted for Ron Paul in 2008, and would certainly vote for him if he actively runs in 2012.

  • God willing Ron paul will win or has created enough liberty lovers that our founders veiws have been reincarnated

  • GO RON PAUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • When will a presidential candidate win by grassroots efforts alone -- zero financial contributions? Not everyone can afford to elect a president. Why can't we have a president who represents everyone, not just the people who paid for the election?

  • Ron has my vote.

  • As Ron said himself during his introduction in the Republican primary for 2008.... I'm Ron Paul and I am a champion of the constitution! There are no other of these corrupt politicians in EITHER party willing to say that because they are committed to DISMANTLING the constitution with their diabolical New World Order agenda! This man is America's only hope! P.S, Sarah Palin is a brainless former beauty queen twit!

  • @Xcorgi

    twat is spelled with an A

  • @Xcorgi Please register online today as a REPUB if you want to vote Ron Paul . Many of his supporters cross party lines and may be shocked to discover they cant vote for him in the critical primary election if they are a DEM in a closed primary state . Dont take a chance because his nomination is too important - change that affiliation to REPUb today . You can change it back later after he wins the nomination if you wish . Pass it on

  • @doogleandalix I was worried about this. How do I change my party? RON PAUL WILL WIN IN 2012!

  • @foreverisalie713 Some closed primary states ;CO,CT,DE,MA,FL,OR,OK,PA,KY,NY­,LA,NE,WV,SD,UT,MD-if U live in one of those (there are others) google your state and Election board. Many will let U change onlibne or download a form -some U have to do it via mail or in person. If you google /wikipedia i and find yours is an OPEN PRIMARY state, U R all set- you can vote either party.Some have told me their state has changed since the wiki info tho.so call your election board>PM me if U need more help

  • too bad ron paul has said "im not gonna run because republicans are mean ass holes to me"... so i guess obama wins even with your fake 29% lol... think of it this way, obama united democrats, republicans and tea baggers split the conservative vote... 2012 is in the bag for progressives... if its not, then this countries idiotness is out of control, and ill be moving to amsterdam where i can smoke weed and live under a functioning democracy... patriots = republicans, nazis, and communists

  • 0:17 wasn't the national anthem it was god bless america

  • *Applauds* Congrats to Ron Paul, even in a straw poll finishing one point behind a credible candidate like Mitt Romney is impressive. Honestly if the man manages to get the nomination for the GOP Presidential candidate in 2012 he will have my full support...as will anyone else who runs against Obama. Hell even Hillary Clinton would have been better than the naive fool we have in office now.

  • Obama may have change you can believe in,

    but you don't need faith with Ron Paul, he's change you can actually know is true and knows for a fact is real!

  • @abdishtar How do you know? 

  • 0:17 dispicable absolutely absurd

  • Olympia Snowe 2012- REAL LEADERSHIP FOR AMERICA

    YES SHE CAN!!!

    Let's crack that glass ceiling, once and for all!!!

    OLYMPIA~ Prooven. Reseliant. Independent

  • @Empoli5

    moron...

  • Olympia Snowe 2012- REAL LEADERSHIP FOR AMERICA

    YES SHE CAN!!!

    Let's crack that glass ceiling, once and for all!!!

    OLYMPIA~ Prooven. Reseliant. Independent

  • To Ron Paul worshipers; riddle me this -- if your man is so opposed to the Neo-Con influence in government why did sit idly by and basically support his Republican parties Bush-Cheney regime for eight long years??? I know he opposed the Iraq war but what other actions did he take?

  • @marcostar57

    Well I can't speak for the "RonPaulTheists", I can speak for those who are like me and are his supporters.

    He did alot more than Obama did to oppose the war. He supported several forms of legislation for keeping it so that only congress can declare war, and to keep it from keeping on changing to the president. He did other stuff as well.

  • @abdishtar Ok, maybe you're not a totally a loon; but calling liberals like me "socialist/communist" is asinine. Did you know that liberals have many "libertarian" values? We don't want illegal gov't wiretapping of our phone/email; or interference in my private life & civil liberties (the ACLU..ah!) 

    OK, Ron Paul did some things but it's too bad he wasn't more foceful & vocal. He should have opposed Bush in the GOP primaries in 2004. That would have taken guts!

  • @marcostar57

    I should've made myself more clear, I apologise, I was refering to the neoliberals.

    I completely agree that the Patriot Act and the other crap Bush did shouldn't have ever occured, and I honestly think he should be tried in court for breaking american law overseas. People in american hands (whether on our bases, or home, citizens or not) shouldn't be mistreated. Especially before they move beyond being "suspected" terrorists. Innocent until proven guilty.

  • @abdishtar

    I agree w/what you said here! ;-)

  • @marcostar57

    In 2004, I was 14 years old, I agree he should've been more vocal, but I wasn't into politics that long ago.

    I don't know what he did then. Then again, he isn't too well known for telling people what to think or who they should or shouldn't vote for. He lets people think for themselves

  • @marcostar57

    BTW, neocons are interventionists, he is not, Obama is, that makes Obama suspiciously look like Bush.

  • Yes, I know but NeoCons are HYPERinterventionists (pre-emption doctrine). I appluad Paul's foreign policy views (some liberals like Dennis Kucinich share his views). Obama is a states-quo interventionist not in line w/the "Bush Doctrine." BTW, America has been interventionist since 1900.

  • @marcostar57

    "supported the Bush-Cheney regime"???

    what did you expect him to do? start name calling as you do? what does that accomplish besides showing how unintelligent you are

    how many other republicans can you name that not only voted against the war, but also continued to stand against it vocally to this day

  • @ineternitypast "Bush-Cheney regime" I don't see any name-calling? It was a regime. They both believed in the "unitary executive" concept that greatly expanded presidential power but I didn't hear much complaining from Republican libertarians (or tea-baggers) over this. Maybe Bob Barr... but us Progressives howled. I appluad Paul for his foreign policy views but again, too bad he didn't challenge Bush in '04 to really showcase his opposition.

  • @marcostar57

    O yeah he did, look back into what he did. He did too challenge it. Maybe not both wars but I know for a fact he challenged the Iraq wasn't taken too seriously. Perhaps they shouldve'