Thats true, Arab records also say about the same numbers that th romans had about 100000 to 150000, I dont remember good, but what you don't mension is that you are not including the christian Arabs of the north (ghassanids and lakhmids kingdoms) who also fought with the roman army, they where also about 100000, so the total Roman Byzantine army was about 250000.
'Pure luck'? No. Luck doesn't come into it when the 'Chosen People' are involved. After all, they were 540 Arabs fighting against 4.5 million Byzantines at Yarmouk, right!?
@boru1982 wrong info ! to be exact 250.000 romans against 36.000 Muslim the war ended with the defeat of Romans with no surviving soliders while Muslims lost 4000 solider
@SR86egy To be exact? Not one historian can be exact. I have no idea why you think you can be. Have you got a source for this very unlikely number? Off the top of my head try reading Louis Bréhier, Michael Angold, J.F Haldon or Jonathan Shepard. What are your sources?
You are all a bunch of fucking morons, thinking you know exactly what somebody believed nearly 2500 years ago just because it was the general custom. Saddie, everything you say is full of shit. How did one of your bullshit comments get thumbed up so much. I'll tell you why. Its because the muslims will believe anything that romanticises their religion and makes it look good.
"Although Yarmouk is little known today, it is one of the most decisive battles in human history...... Had Heraclius' forces prevailed, the modern world would be so changed as to be unrecognizable."
@zeshy999 I do not disagree, however that would probably be the case with many many battles throughout history. If Heraclius' forces had prevailed it would've still been only a matter of time before the Arabs would take it. By the 660s the Byzantines had lost Syria, Egypt, Tunisia, Cyprus and even Armenia. They were pushed all the way back to Anatolia. Don't forget Constantinople was fighting on both eastern and western(Avars, Slavs, Bulgars) front.
@zeshy999 The Persian Wars seriously weakened the Byzantines. By 619 Heraclius had given up all hope and was even seriously considering moving the capital to the West. The reason Islam lives today has nearly as much to do with the Persians as it does with the Arabs.
@boru1982 ironic - yet still the Byzantine's could gather an army 5 or 6 times the size as the Muslim one with the best armour, swords, archers, horses etc.
the Muslims had limited access to weapons and no supply to armour with only a few horses.
your theory is proven wrong because it doesn't pan out, at yarmouk Christians from all over came to fight including the Slavs, Franks, Georgians, Armenian's,- gathering an army of 400,000. so no they weren't weak I'd say they were in their prime.
@zeshy999 Heraclius' victory over the Persians was a Pyrrhic victory. If you don't think thats the case then you're disagreeing with every scholar. Why do you think the Arabian conquest of the eastern empire was so quick!? Heraclius had to muster an untrained army together to fight at Yarmouk. The Slavs were the Byzantines' enemies at the time and I've no idea how you think the Merovingian Franks were apart of this. But your estimation 400,000 proves my 1st post - To romanticise your religion.
@boru1982 he had 6 years after the Persians to bring an army together and train it - 6 years, that's long and enough time to raise,train and get it ready to fight- also like I said at yarmouk he was aided by other Christians the Arabs, Slavs, Armenian's etc. the fact of the matter is the Muslims crushed an army 10 times the size of theirs and before you say it agen ' romanticise your religion' how do you know I'm even Muslim?
@zeshy999 The Byzantines were fighting the Franks in Gaul, the Lombards in Italy, the Visigoths in Spain and were already heavily depleted in the East by the Persians. They didn't have 6 years to build an army because the last thing they would've expected was an Arab assault. The Arab tribes at the time were just that. They were tribes that Heraclius felt didn't pose a threat.Heraclius used them against Persia as Khusro used them against the Empire. As i said he had no time to train an army.
@boru1982 at the end of the day you believe Islam survives today because the Byzantine's were weakened by other threats and its pure luck that today its gathered so much followers.
my belief is that they had faith and Almighty G-d was on their side.
no matter how many enemies are there... muslim will win! allah is the greatest! i love how the roman cavs run towards the archers and stop when they get to the muslims first line! :D hahahah
@saddie15 quarter of a million Byzantines???? You must be joking. Most of the Byzantine army were in the Balkans fighting the Avars and Slavs. Even 90,000 troops is over-exaggerating the number.
@saddie15 -.- islam was founded in 636.alexander the great was around 430 before christ!HOW CAN HE COME TO BELIEVE IN YOUR GOD IF THERE WAS NO MONOTHEISM THERE?IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!
Everyone knows he sacrificed to the greek gods and that he became the persian heir by conquest.Your statement makes no sense
@saddie15 alexander didn't believe in one god he believed in the many gods of the hellenic pantheon because he grew up in that religion.If you told me about plisophophers of ancient greece which DID believe in the one and unkown god then i wouldn't argue but this hasn't got historical proof.Also you say the monotheistic religions believe in one god.yes true but then why do you keep saying your god?
@videonfan alexander isn't the person saddies thinks hes talking about. it is dhul qurnain who built the wall for G&M , he was a man sent by God. historians believe alexander and dhul quranain are 1 and the same but they have many differences also y do u say 'YOUR GOD' - the 1 God that came to Muhammed (pbuh) is the same that came to Abraham(pbuh), Isaac (pbuh), Jacob (pbuh). Allah, Jehovah, Elohim are all 1 and the same regardless to the names given.
@saddie15 to be exact 250.000 romans against 36.000 Muslim the war ended with the defeat of Romans with no surviving soliders while Muslims lost 4000 solider
@propianist2009 Arabs were lucky because both Byzantine and Persians were worn out from their wars for over 600 years. Arabs did not have a fair game. it's like you beat someone up that is alreay beaten and bloody. Does not count.
I like the video as well but the music destroy's the entire religious feeling you get while watching this. Dear brother music is haram, i don't have to copy and paste the ahadith if you like i can do so no problem inscha ALLAH. According to the 4 madhabs music is also haram. Imam Shefi3i Imam Maliki Imam Ahmed and Abu hanifa. U r probably a turk, did u know that the hanafies didn't even took testemonies of people who listed music thats how they hated music. May ALLAH 4 give us
Hey dude, calm down. Its a game. I know the game and its maps, their is a Syrian Map and that's not the map. Besides the video is good, their was no offense in my remark so brother please retrain yourself, there is no need for you to go onto the offensive and insult as far as to say learn to be humble. Easy their tiger :)
@4268326 sorry but the truth is that u are the one who biggend to be offensive but u r not analyzing your way of words before you write it this not me who biggend this but the proplem is sometimes people donts them selves right cuz when they look at the mirror they see their shape from outside but not from inside ok and now u r tring to be humble so that's nice im happy for you :) that's why i will tell you
@4268326 think out of the box this is the american and european way of talking wasn't it? So why is it all sand? Lol :P >> wasn't it ? >>expression :Mocking the video info So why is it all sand? >> expression : Confirmation for wasn't it ? Lol >>>actually they use it mostly as :P and this expression :P means = emagin me doing this face to you and feel it and tell me what is ur feeling in that time and then u will know why i became offensive in my reply cuz u r the one who started
@mrsarabico Even if they did there numbers were at 5:1 skilled warrior should of ATLEAST won against the Muslims who were PEASANTS AND old people with torn up clothing so there MUST of been some spiritual being to help them there were deficient in weaponry and armor compared to the Byzantines as well. .
People who want this video to be 100% accurate have obviously never played the Total War series lol
But good attempt, only thing i will say is there should be far more Byzantines on the field since they outnumbered the Muslims vastly. Also they used the famous Tortoise formation which cant really be replicated.
A good little video, but obviously a simplification of that epic battle!
@temogen2 what ottomons ? battle of Yarmook was at the life of the prophet Mohmmad .اللهم صلي على سيدنا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه وسلم there wasn't any ottomons by that time , and actually it was in the desert just right by their castle
Is this Rome or Medieval total war?
IAMDUTCHMAN1581 5 days ago
@IAMDUTCHMAN1581
Medieval 2 Total War
OttomanTotalWar 5 days ago
its actually 1000 muslims vs 200000 romans
islamgood1243123 2 weeks ago
You should do this on Broken Crescent, that Mod is sick.
khasseki 1 month ago
I forget to mention that most of the Roman Byzantine army was from eastern europe, russians, georgians, armenians etc.
kingi97 1 month ago
@funnyarabvids roman greeks :P
Ether702 3 months ago
this is a crucial battle for islam if arabs lost this battle then there is no islam remains today.
mark12345678965 4 months ago
Every Muslim warrior had 2 angels helping him to kill many crusaders or disbelievers.
Mascew530 6 months ago 2
when i am in the battlefield i love it more than when i am in my house .....the great KHALID BIN WALEED .RA.
KASHMIRI7864LYFE 6 months ago 3
this battle is lol
can not be
Jun0w13 6 months ago
@Jun0w13 It happened in real life so you say it cant be.
BatmanbinSuperman12 1 month ago
@Jun0w13 read history ... brainwashed un educated man
slix1991 1 month ago
Wiki - "estimates for the Byzantine army are mostly between 80,000 and 120,000, with some estimates as low as 50,000 and 15,000–20,000."
boru1982 6 months ago 2
@boru1982
Thats true, Arab records also say about the same numbers that th romans had about 100000 to 150000, I dont remember good, but what you don't mension is that you are not including the christian Arabs of the north (ghassanids and lakhmids kingdoms) who also fought with the roman army, they where also about 100000, so the total Roman Byzantine army was about 250000.
kingi97 1 month ago
'Pure luck'? No. Luck doesn't come into it when the 'Chosen People' are involved. After all, they were 540 Arabs fighting against 4.5 million Byzantines at Yarmouk, right!?
boru1982 7 months ago
@boru1982 wrong info ! to be exact 250.000 romans against 36.000 Muslim the war ended with the defeat of Romans with no surviving soliders while Muslims lost 4000 solider
SR86egy 7 months ago
@SR86egy
it was round 40.000 so dont say wrong info.
khalid ibn al walid used major tacic never used before
mobile guard!
saddie15 6 months ago
@saddie15 Dude i read it on wikipedia google it
SR86egy 6 months ago
@SR86egy To be exact? Not one historian can be exact. I have no idea why you think you can be. Have you got a source for this very unlikely number? Off the top of my head try reading Louis Bréhier, Michael Angold, J.F Haldon or Jonathan Shepard. What are your sources?
boru1982 6 months ago
@boru1982 my source is Wikipedia google it you might be correct though i only read it on wikipedia
SR86egy 6 months ago
You are all a bunch of fucking morons, thinking you know exactly what somebody believed nearly 2500 years ago just because it was the general custom. Saddie, everything you say is full of shit. How did one of your bullshit comments get thumbed up so much. I'll tell you why. Its because the muslims will believe anything that romanticises their religion and makes it look good.
boru1982 7 months ago
@boru1982
George F. Nafziger:
"Although Yarmouk is little known today, it is one of the most decisive battles in human history...... Had Heraclius' forces prevailed, the modern world would be so changed as to be unrecognizable."
zeshy999 7 months ago
@zeshy999 I do not disagree, however that would probably be the case with many many battles throughout history. If Heraclius' forces had prevailed it would've still been only a matter of time before the Arabs would take it. By the 660s the Byzantines had lost Syria, Egypt, Tunisia, Cyprus and even Armenia. They were pushed all the way back to Anatolia. Don't forget Constantinople was fighting on both eastern and western(Avars, Slavs, Bulgars) front.
boru1982 7 months ago
@boru1982
then whats "muslims will believe anything that romanticises their religion and makes it look good." meant to mean.
zeshy999 7 months ago
@zeshy999 look at the second highest rated comment and all will be revealed.
boru1982 7 months ago
@zeshy999 The Persian Wars seriously weakened the Byzantines. By 619 Heraclius had given up all hope and was even seriously considering moving the capital to the West. The reason Islam lives today has nearly as much to do with the Persians as it does with the Arabs.
boru1982 7 months ago
@boru1982 ironic - yet still the Byzantine's could gather an army 5 or 6 times the size as the Muslim one with the best armour, swords, archers, horses etc.
the Muslims had limited access to weapons and no supply to armour with only a few horses.
your theory is proven wrong because it doesn't pan out, at yarmouk Christians from all over came to fight including the Slavs, Franks, Georgians, Armenian's,- gathering an army of 400,000. so no they weren't weak I'd say they were in their prime.
zeshy999 7 months ago
@zeshy999 Heraclius' victory over the Persians was a Pyrrhic victory. If you don't think thats the case then you're disagreeing with every scholar. Why do you think the Arabian conquest of the eastern empire was so quick!? Heraclius had to muster an untrained army together to fight at Yarmouk. The Slavs were the Byzantines' enemies at the time and I've no idea how you think the Merovingian Franks were apart of this. But your estimation 400,000 proves my 1st post - To romanticise your religion.
boru1982 7 months ago
@boru1982 he had 6 years after the Persians to bring an army together and train it - 6 years, that's long and enough time to raise,train and get it ready to fight- also like I said at yarmouk he was aided by other Christians the Arabs, Slavs, Armenian's etc. the fact of the matter is the Muslims crushed an army 10 times the size of theirs and before you say it agen ' romanticise your religion' how do you know I'm even Muslim?
zeshy999 7 months ago
@zeshy999 The Byzantines were fighting the Franks in Gaul, the Lombards in Italy, the Visigoths in Spain and were already heavily depleted in the East by the Persians. They didn't have 6 years to build an army because the last thing they would've expected was an Arab assault. The Arab tribes at the time were just that. They were tribes that Heraclius felt didn't pose a threat.Heraclius used them against Persia as Khusro used them against the Empire. As i said he had no time to train an army.
boru1982 7 months ago
@boru1982 at the end of the day you believe Islam survives today because the Byzantine's were weakened by other threats and its pure luck that today its gathered so much followers.
my belief is that they had faith and Almighty G-d was on their side.
zeshy999 7 months ago
Arabs fight with hearts the never step back on a fight even if they haven't got the weapons ,, Arabs is great and God is the greatest ^_^
FreeLibyanDernawi 7 months ago
Comment removed
FreeLibyanDernawi 7 months ago
Shogun ? ^^'
sadow93300 8 months ago
WHERE CAN I GET THE FULL ENGLISH VERSION OF BATTLE OF YARMOUK? THANKS.
QGprincess 8 months ago
no matter how many enemies are there... muslim will win! allah is the greatest! i love how the roman cavs run towards the archers and stop when they get to the muslims first line! :D hahahah
moalsaha 9 months ago
no matter how many enemies are there... muslim will win! allah is the greatest!
moalsaha 9 months ago
dude battle of yarmouk was 250.000 romans againt 40.000 muslims,
saddie15 9 months ago 31
@saddie15 quarter of a million Byzantines???? You must be joking. Most of the Byzantine army were in the Balkans fighting the Avars and Slavs. Even 90,000 troops is over-exaggerating the number.
boru1982 7 months ago
Comment removed
saddie15 7 months ago
Comment removed
saddie15 7 months ago
@boru1982
alexander the great won a war against dariusIII
alexander strenght was 35.000 against 200.000 persians
alexander believed in the 1god as we muslims do.
ever heard of the gog&magog? he build the wall for them
saddie15 7 months ago
@saddie15 actually alexander the great believed in the greek mythological gods
videonfan 7 months ago
@videonfan
haha no he believed in the 1god as the muslims are now.
alexander the great is even in the muslims book quran.
saddie15 7 months ago
@saddie15 -.- islam was founded in 636.alexander the great was around 430 before christ!HOW CAN HE COME TO BELIEVE IN YOUR GOD IF THERE WAS NO MONOTHEISM THERE?IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!
Everyone knows he sacrificed to the greek gods and that he became the persian heir by conquest.Your statement makes no sense
videonfan 7 months ago
@videonfan
haha how he can believe in our god (allah)?
i will tell you something jews,christians and islam believe in 1god(same god)
and before moses there was alot of other messangers that god send.
to believe in the 1 god and alexander did also believed.
saddie15 7 months ago
@saddie15 alexander didn't believe in one god he believed in the many gods of the hellenic pantheon because he grew up in that religion.If you told me about plisophophers of ancient greece which DID believe in the one and unkown god then i wouldn't argue but this hasn't got historical proof.Also you say the monotheistic religions believe in one god.yes true but then why do you keep saying your god?
videonfan 7 months ago
@saddie15 ill send you in private because youtube won't let me
videonfan 7 months ago
@videonfan alexander isn't the person saddies thinks hes talking about. it is dhul qurnain who built the wall for G&M , he was a man sent by God. historians believe alexander and dhul quranain are 1 and the same but they have many differences also y do u say 'YOUR GOD' - the 1 God that came to Muhammed (pbuh) is the same that came to Abraham(pbuh), Isaac (pbuh), Jacob (pbuh). Allah, Jehovah, Elohim are all 1 and the same regardless to the names given.
peace
zeshy999 7 months ago
@saddie15 to be exact 250.000 romans against 36.000 Muslim the war ended with the defeat of Romans with no surviving soliders while Muslims lost 4000 solider
SR86egy 7 months ago
@saddie15 If Romans had Republican military standard, then Romans will win this war.
Befor muslim, has been a long extensive/ debilitating war, from 56 b.c. to 636 with Parthians and Sassanids.
And the East Roman army in 7.century has been a half barbaric and poorly armed.
oxis77gas 2 months ago
Always Arabs Number One :) I Means muslims Not juste arab But Evry Musim
aiirakaz 10 months ago 5
Always Arabs Number One :)
aiirakaz 10 months ago
Great Batlle I rerally Wish to be there
hicham8257 10 months ago
Heraclius wasn't even at that battle. It was Mahan who led the Romans.
lionwraith95 10 months ago
We need a band how play music like this.. medieval music rock xD!.. good video :P
tropochito 1 year ago
good music
KaroQuran 1 year ago
@OttomanTotalWar
thanks a lot dude
Elie246 1 year ago
what I like about this video is the music, I mean the tracks used in it; can you please tell me the names of those tracks and where I can find them?
Elie246 1 year ago
go grandfather khalid.
xal7ooot 1 year ago
@Praventore Tell me how Indonesia became islamic country then
TheLegoauto 1 year ago
@propianist2009 LOOL you idiot. Youre right though, the arabs didnt have fair game.. they were hopelessly outnumbered.
nn909 1 year ago
@propianist2009 yup, ofcourse they did. Even though Arabs brought Islam to persia.
nn909 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@propianist2009 Arabs were lucky because both Byzantine and Persians were worn out from their wars for over 600 years. Arabs did not have a fair game. it's like you beat someone up that is alreay beaten and bloody. Does not count.
propianist2009 1 year ago
love arab love alah love islam love this game good video
ayoubalami1999 1 year ago
love arab love alah love islam love this game good video
ayoubalami1999 1 year ago
those are not arabs the man yellow tho s are egyptians mamluk
TheLuxor80 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheLuxor80 who are arabs...
LastJihad1 1 year ago
yes mamluks are turks
1905efe 1 year ago
nice video
mrsarabico 1 year ago
This video is not realistic, it is an example.
OttomanTotalWar 1 year ago 4
@OttomanTotalWar
yeah ur right man u r tring to tell the smart concept of the fight
that's all
you are very very smart man and i would like to work with u in ur videos to add color grading tech to make it look cinematic
if u can do it then its fine i just want to help that's all to have the ajr :) and have some hasanat
realy cool way of thinking and smart production
jazak allah khir man jazak allah khir
theshiningeagle 1 year ago
@OttomanTotalWar
I like the video as well but the music destroy's the entire religious feeling you get while watching this. Dear brother music is haram, i don't have to copy and paste the ahadith if you like i can do so no problem inscha ALLAH. According to the 4 madhabs music is also haram. Imam Shefi3i Imam Maliki Imam Ahmed and Abu hanifa. U r probably a turk, did u know that the hanafies didn't even took testemonies of people who listed music thats how they hated music. May ALLAH 4 give us
Soelly 10 months ago
@OttomanTotalWar hahahahahahahah medival toatal war egypt vs byzantium :)
thugyheadbanger 8 months ago
why is in the middle of the desert? The battle was fought in Syria, wasn't it? So why is it all sand? Lol :P
4268326 1 year ago
@4268326 u just wanna say some words to say hey this not write
even if it was right and even if it was 80 % right 20 % wrong
but u just want to look to the wrong
and dont want to see the right
..............................................
im i right if im wrong tell me
theshiningeagle 1 year ago
@theshiningeagle hahaha... maybe :P Still, do you have an answer why its being fought in the middle of the Sahara desert ?
4268326 1 year ago
@4268326
u tell me mr jenius
and proud
u dont know who ur talking to
cuz i dont want u to know
but i can tell u why it was in the middle of the Sahara desert
learn to be humble and then i will tell u
theshiningeagle 1 year ago
Comment removed
4268326 1 year ago
@theshiningeagle
Hey dude, calm down. Its a game. I know the game and its maps, their is a Syrian Map and that's not the map. Besides the video is good, their was no offense in my remark so brother please retrain yourself, there is no need for you to go onto the offensive and insult as far as to say learn to be humble. Easy their tiger :)
4268326 1 year ago
theshiningeagle 1 year ago
@4268326
i will send u the trick to the inbox
theshiningeagle 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
theshiningeagle 1 year ago
@4268326
peace man
im not anything but just a water gun shooting water on some people faces who they need me to shoot on them to see themselves
that's all
me to i need some modifications and im working on it too
salam alikoum
theshiningeagle 1 year ago
the info is wrong the byzantines were 310000 not 90000, there loss in battle field was above 150000
fdgh5 1 year ago
Comment removed
fdgh5 1 year ago
the battle is unrealistic the byzantines were better and more than the arabs but they made critical stratigic errors
MegaChristaras 1 year ago
@MegaChristaras arab always win
mrsarabico 1 year ago
@mrsarabico i say again byzantines were beeter adn far superior , but they made critical strategic errors thats the thruth dude
MegaChristaras 1 year ago
@MegaChristaras maybe
mrsarabico 1 year ago
@mrsarabico Even if they did there numbers were at 5:1 skilled warrior should of ATLEAST won against the Muslims who were PEASANTS AND old people with torn up clothing so there MUST of been some spiritual being to help them there were deficient in weaponry and armor compared to the Byzantines as well. .
Khan12078 1 year ago
@Khan12078 can u explain it for me brother
mrsarabico 1 year ago
@mrsarabico in what way brother
Khan12078 1 year ago
@Khan12078 ok no problem thanks
mrsarabico 1 year ago
Good attempt.
People who want this video to be 100% accurate have obviously never played the Total War series lol
But good attempt, only thing i will say is there should be far more Byzantines on the field since they outnumbered the Muslims vastly. Also they used the famous Tortoise formation which cant really be replicated.
A good little video, but obviously a simplification of that epic battle!
Janissary225 1 year ago
good job
AsHwH 1 year ago
the battle wasn't in the dessert.
And the Crescent was the flag of the Ottoman empire .
thanks
temogen2 1 year ago
@temogen2 what ottomons ? battle of Yarmook was at the life of the prophet Mohmmad .اللهم صلي على سيدنا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه وسلم there wasn't any ottomons by that time , and actually it was in the desert just right by their castle
Now7or 1 year ago
Comment removed
fdgh5 1 year ago
Comment removed
fdgh5 1 year ago