if fashion designers need to keep the sample size all the same then why not add a couple numbers to that zero? make the norm a 4 or 6, nothing too drastic.
It is important to note that very few (if any) of todays most successful models wear size 0. Skinniest girl I can think of is Freja Beha (which imo is an extreme case) and she wears size 2.
Try googling some and you'll find that the majority of the top girls; Abbey, Raquel, Natasha, Anja and Karlie all wear US size 4. The sexy ones (VS angels for example) are rarely thinner than size 6.
They're all uber-tall though so it looks different when put in proportion.
All the decades that Crystal Renn described, there was always a sample size. Do I agree that we should keep the size 0? NO. A size that looks healthy, like size 6 or 8 but still in the concept of modeling. Because fashion, especially high fashion, is to sell a dream, a dream of high life. It's a logistical manner to have one size for every piece of clothing. It's easier to keep track, it's easier to fit and it's the base for the gradation afterwards.
@sweetaliena CONT:Imagine if you have to make the samples in different size for the runway only, first you have to buy the different mannequins for the fitting which cost about $1,000 each and more depending the size, hire fitting models for every size, buy more fabric and the makers/seamstress/manufacturers will work longer hours. Also, if you have to correct something in one size you have to correct it in each size, more time again. This COST A LOT OF MONEY, not everyone has the budget.
Crystal is a smart girl and this debate certainly has some interesting points.
Truth is though that there are many practical advantages with having models wearing the same size. Clothes shown on the runway are all samples and in need to be the same size so models can be replaceable and if the magazines shall be able to shoot them later on.
It has pretty much become an industry standard to have all models the same size nowadays. I agree that it's a bit monotonous but there are reasons to it.
you can talk what ever you want but fact is that clothes will always look better on skinny girl and sellers know that, and so they use it to sell the product!
@Nightberrii Bullshit. Clothes will always look better on girls like Crystal, who is now a healthy size 6/8. If you're toned and slim, then you can wear whatever you want and you'll look glamourous. There's no need to drop to a size 0/2. That's as ugly as a size 20.
Love Crystal's jacket...and her of course!
marymitcheva 6 months ago
goooood video
blackhorse099 9 months ago
crystal renn is so gorgeous.
if fashion designers need to keep the sample size all the same then why not add a couple numbers to that zero? make the norm a 4 or 6, nothing too drastic.
sherbymushroom 1 year ago
@sherbymushroom
It is important to note that very few (if any) of todays most successful models wear size 0. Skinniest girl I can think of is Freja Beha (which imo is an extreme case) and she wears size 2.
Try googling some and you'll find that the majority of the top girls; Abbey, Raquel, Natasha, Anja and Karlie all wear US size 4. The sexy ones (VS angels for example) are rarely thinner than size 6.
They're all uber-tall though so it looks different when put in proportion.
Gtgoon 1 year ago
@Gtgoon well then good!
sherbymushroom 1 year ago
All the decades that Crystal Renn described, there was always a sample size. Do I agree that we should keep the size 0? NO. A size that looks healthy, like size 6 or 8 but still in the concept of modeling. Because fashion, especially high fashion, is to sell a dream, a dream of high life. It's a logistical manner to have one size for every piece of clothing. It's easier to keep track, it's easier to fit and it's the base for the gradation afterwards.
sweetaliena 1 year ago
@sweetaliena CONT:Imagine if you have to make the samples in different size for the runway only, first you have to buy the different mannequins for the fitting which cost about $1,000 each and more depending the size, hire fitting models for every size, buy more fabric and the makers/seamstress/manufacturers will work longer hours. Also, if you have to correct something in one size you have to correct it in each size, more time again. This COST A LOT OF MONEY, not everyone has the budget.
sweetaliena 1 year ago
Crystal is a smart girl and this debate certainly has some interesting points.
Truth is though that there are many practical advantages with having models wearing the same size. Clothes shown on the runway are all samples and in need to be the same size so models can be replaceable and if the magazines shall be able to shoot them later on.
It has pretty much become an industry standard to have all models the same size nowadays. I agree that it's a bit monotonous but there are reasons to it.
Gtgoon 1 year ago 8
@Gtgoon Valid points, but why choose such small sizes?
TheMODEGeek 5 months ago
crystal renn YES! i love you!
sunnybeets2055 1 year ago 3
you can talk what ever you want but fact is that clothes will always look better on skinny girl and sellers know that, and so they use it to sell the product!
Nightberrii 1 year ago
@Nightberrii Bullshit. Clothes will always look better on girls like Crystal, who is now a healthy size 6/8. If you're toned and slim, then you can wear whatever you want and you'll look glamourous. There's no need to drop to a size 0/2. That's as ugly as a size 20.
FlyingBuyo 1 week ago
yessss! I would love for that to happen. :]
wynngoes 1 year ago