Added: 4 years ago
From: Neji107
Views: 52,808
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (171)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Advance.disace killed aztcks

  • i study this in 5th grade!

  • Most Mexicans are NOT mixed.

    The people at 6:24 are Natives,NOT mixed.

  • @1coolguysuper sorry but only 10% of mexicans are native americans

  • I wonder if I am Aztec o.O.. Was born in Jalisco,Mexico..I know I have European blood but it would be nice to know my ancestors XD

  • Wow very nice reminds me a lot of Ancient Greece ..and is that music from shadow of the colossus at 2:07 lol

  • the aztecs were more advanced than Europe in everythig except with firearms

    

  • Dang! Intense music! D: Great film! :)

  • @blackmonkey849 the fall of the Aztecs was because of the European advanced technology and disease.

  • @arnaldodacomando It was the alliance with other natives and the diseases.

    Today Spain is considered the armpit of Europe,Spain gonna fall.

  • Completion of the doctoral thesis of Dr. Phil. Peter Hassler (translated into Spanish), entitled: human sacrifice among the Aztecs? A study of sources and of ideology, University of Zurich, 1992, 478p:

    ... "For all this, my research result in the probability of the existence of institutionalized human sacrifice among the Mexica and other Indian peoples is so small that you can not say anything but these sacrifices were nonexistent."

  • @paulocesarrs Then what of the Flower Wars -- mass ritual combats between the Aztecs and their neighbors around the Valley of Mexico, the main purpose of which was to force the defeated tribe to provide captives to be sacrificed on the great temples of Huichibolos, Huitzilipoctli, and Tlaloc? And of the Aztec's strong preference for capturing opponents in real combat alive (when it would have been tactically advantageous to kill them outright), to placate the gods w/sacrifice?

  • @50zcarsman Ultimately you can believe whatever you want to believe. What I can tell you is that if there were as many human sacrifices as many believe, much more REAL evidence would exist. Where is it?? (REAL, not interpretations). Also, you can get to know descendants from many prehispanic cultures, and you will find that they are some of the most kind and pacific human beings alive. Why do you think is this??

  • Conclusión de la Tesis Doctoral del Dr. Phil. Peter Hassler (traducida al español), titulada: ¿Sacrificios humanos entre los aztecas? Un estudio de las fuentes y de la ideología, Universidad de Zurich, 1992, 478p:

    ..."Por todo esto, mis investigaciones dan por resultado que la probabilidad de la existencia de los sacrificios humanos institucionalizados entre los MEXICAS y otros pueblos indios es tan pequeña que no se puede decir otra cosa que estos sacrificios eran inexistentes."

    ¡Viva México!

  • Conclusión de la Tesis Doctoral del Dr. Phil. Peter Hassler (traducida al español), titulada: ¿Sacrificios humanos entre los aztecas? Un estudio de las fuentes y de la ideología, Universidad de Zurich, 1992, 478p:

    ..."Por todo esto, mis investigaciones dan por resultado que la probabilidad de la existencia de los sacrificios humanos institucionalizados entre los MEXICAS y otros pueblos indios es tan pequeña que no se puede decir otra cosa que estos sacrificios eran inexistentes."

    ¡Viva México!

  • werent the aztecs worried that they might run out of 'sacrificrs' ?

  • A beautiful civilization thats roots can still be seen in the exican people today.

  • @xxskinlikewinterxx "The Aztec's where pagan"

    First of all, not all of the Nahua people were followers of the popular religions at that place and time. Some of them (the more intelligent and reasonable Nahuas) were ATHEISTS. Second, the BELIEFS that the more popular religions asserted were centered around a SINGLE God who was both mother and father: Ometeotl: one in two, two in one: duality. Also, there were many intermediary gradations in between the theistic/atheistic divisions. Read more bro

  • @xxskinlikewinterxx The English commited genocide on the North American Indians.

  • @xxskinlikewinterxx

    Actually most of their deaths were due to the sicks brought by europeans , of course they killed some native americans but not 70-100 millions by themself lol , most of them died by the brittish and Americans later . Spanish has nothing to do with north america , the most friendly to them were the french they even were allied to them against british during the 7 years war . Many Mayas and Aztecs villages were allied with Spanish against the big mayas and aztec cities .

  • @xxskinlikewinterxx indian, in all America don't pass 12 million. They can't produce food for 70 million, don't be ignorant. You can learn nahuatl today as other language, don't be liar.

    ¡Ah! and AZTECS WERE CANNIBALS, if you don't know that.

  • @boeffi10

    "indian, in all America don't pass 12 million." They were more dude , the incas were already between 12 and 15 millions lol just the incas . 

  • @NasriTheNewKing Believe I recall reading that there were only some 7-8 million Indians, maximum, in all of N. America when the Pilgrims landed, falling as a result of disease, combat, and demoralization to only 250,000 by the time our Indian Wars ended in 1890. It's all conjecture (no censuses), but the Indians' methods of getting food required alot of land around each settlement -- whether in the East or West. One surprise attack by the Whites could disperse an entire tribe.

  • @boeffi10 AH, But heres a bigger surprise! I was watching the Science channel and they had a documentary how Northern Europeans used to cannibalise their people! Especially the Germans.

  • @boeffi10 "indian, in all America don't pass 12 million"... "don't be ignorant"

    This could be the most ironic thing I've ever read on the internet. Congratulations.

  • @boeffi10 The Abrahamic God also encourages people to commit canniblism, how do you explain jeremiah 19:9?

  • @caraiotto. Thanks for ur response. My comment was not ignorant in any way it was a fact. 80% of all Mex are part native American n European. To hate a part of u is stupid. A Spaniards blood is just as important and anyone else's. Ur ignorance shows; just bec I'm Mex doesn't mean I'm Aztec. I'm not!!! To assume they are "my people" makes u ignorant. They are not my people. I'm not Aztec! There are Navajo, Apache, Comanche, n others! I admire the Aztecs but they are not my "people". Mex is gre

  • They cut out 55 hearts a day? What kind of sadistic gods were these? hah. and I'm mexican-american. this was a savage religion (and no, I'm not a Christian.)

  • @dionusos2 aztecs did have a savage religion. But compared to the savage desire for gold, the spaniards take the cake.

  • @dionusos2 You gotta get out more if you think mexicans have light eyes lol wow

  • I don't understand people hating Spaniards. They were no different than Aztecs who conquered people, or Romans, Greeks, Egyptians etc. Being Mex I speak Spanish, am Christian, eat beef, chicken, wheat, dairy, listen to Mex music played with guitars, harp, trumpets, piano. All these things were brought over by Spaniards n other Europeans. If u hate it so much don't speak Spanish, or be a Christian, don't eat the food, don't listen to the music. It's that simple.

  • @shwmehvn Dont be so ignorant. You know its not that simple. Almost everything that you are is a result of a forced changed that occured long ago. You just have no real idea how successful ur people used to be before the spaniards. Italian food would be nothing without mesoamerican tomatoes, thai food would be nothing without mesoamerican chilis, dutch chocolate would be nothing without Mexica. You should recognize your peoples contributions.

  • @shwmehvn The difference is, the Spaniards were foreign and of another race.

  • de_aztec

  • I just found out that I am 50% Aztec from my mom's side, and Inca from my dad's except his great great grandfather is from spain...

  • This us another crap!!!! Superb mat.The sun is cycle way. Not sacrifices necessary.

  • Awesome research it's great to know that mexico has the greatest empire ever to be built in all of North America

  • MEXICA TIAHUI MEXICA TIAHUI MEXICA TIAHUI!!! WE WERE NEVER CONQUERED!!! ONLY "INFECTED" BY EUROPEANZ AND ALL THEIR MIZERY!!! DIRTY DISEASED POOR EXCUSE FOR HUMAN BEINGZ!!! REAL MEXICANZ KNW OUR HISTORY!!! STOP TRYN TO TELL US MUTHAFUCKAZ... WE BACK WITH A VENGENCE AND EVERBODY SCARE!!! HAHA FUCKEM...LET THE SACRIFICIN BEGIN... HAHA THERES PLENTY OF USELESS PEOPLE IN THE WORLD 2DAY ANYWAY!!! FRM ALL RACEZ... WHAT MUTHAFUCKAZ WAITIN 4 DOOMZDAY HAHAHAHA

  • Conquistadors are exactly like the United States Army in Iraq... They think they are justice, revolusionizing/civilizing the people they are invading... trying to make others think they are justice... while actually they are a brutal and blood thirsty scourge that rape, murder, torture, and kill for self purposes (greed).

  • @Condom007of007Solace but tearing out 55 hearts a day and enslaving people of other tribes is not brutal and blood thirsty? The aztecs were no better than the spaniards. They inflicted as much pain on innocents within their power

  • @dionusos2 Aztecs kill their enemy for the continuation of thier daily lives, according to what they believe. The Spaniards massacred alled the Aztecs, just for ONE MAN, Hernan Cortes, to claim a bunch gold. Saying the Spaniards were innocent is like saying the Nazis were the good guys. the death of the Aztecs was no different from the Holocaust.

  • @Condom007of007Solace No dude, they don't think they are bringing justice when they invade. They invade for resources and shit and they know it from the very beginning.

  • @Condom007of007Solace lol the only diffrence is this was about 400 years ago :P

  • @danger1asesino jajajaja putete indigena ! mamon de mierda ! vete a limpiar letrinas, animal ! chilangos asquerosos !

  • @cabassos you're a fucking idiot

  • @carsiotto you more ! he visto algunos comentarios tuyos eres un envidioso anti Español, pero igual jodete tú y los puercos Aztecas ! ah, y sus decendientes Chilagos !

  • @cabassos -Why would I envy the Spanish? hahahaa whats to envy? And we both know that it was europeans that were the swine. Filthy fuckers brought disease. Suck my thick aztec cock you little bitch. hahahaaa

  • @carsiotto little insect, you are the plague in person! you and your filthy Aztecs me the step by the balls! haha vete a la m... !

  • @cabassos Little Insect? hahhaaa. Come on man. what a pussy.

  • @cabassos and that's comming from an internet bad ass who wouldn't say that shit to a Mexican or a Chicano in person

  • @uncleruckus714 jajaja me cago en uds bola de desadsaptados, hay de chicano a chicano o mejor dicho de Mexicoamericano los chicanos son una bola de indios nacidos en EU latinos comunes y corrientes mas corrientes que comunes o igual pero los Hispanos son distintos auque nascan donde nascan entiendes, indio!

  • @cabassos VIVA INDIOS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

  • @AztecTripleAlliance con que no salieran a robar a otros Edos.  en DFecolandia estan bien ya se la robarón toda! pateticos asquerosos que son todos... !

  • @cabassos volver a España bastardo

  • @carsiotto moron. most mexicans have european. you likely do. i know your kind. probably light-skinned, light eyes, bemoaning evil europeans while european blood courses through your body.

    and disease is a fact of life. the only reason europeans brought 'disease' is because they were not insulated from the rest of the world--unlike the natives who had no immunity to them. Congratulations: You're a moron

  • @dionusos2 LOL what a troll. Try again dip shit. I know your kind. A fucking idiot. How about Dark eyes dark hair and brown skin? Stupid ass. Anyways, dont be so fucking ignorant.

  • The nahuatl spoken by elderly Mexicans today is NOT the same as the that spoken by Aztecs of the 16th-Century...theirs was 'classical nahuatl' which was like a trading language and of course, all languages change over tiem (500 years) so it cannot be the same.

  • @cacahuate your right we are still alive and well in the millions! Our race did not die! Nor our culture! It just parallels the catholic one look! It still vibrant Mexico and the south west U.S.

  • how come any video made by white people about mexicas(aztecs) always say WE DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO THE AZTECS, white people wish we all had died.

  • thx for the vid. my class is doing the aztec and i have a report on them THX SO MUCH!!

  • Fucking Cortes!

  • @cerdopolis3000 fucking savage

  • With the help of lucifer.

  • Look at ¨Obra en processo¨ to watch how to make Aztec food

  • This video makes me glad to have Aztec blood in me.

  • Say No To Gen Manipulated Food. Say No to Radiated Fruits / Meat. They have printed Money and buy land every where in the world. They are Growing Gin plants like no time Before. As the Result all the Bee's and other small animals are Dieying

    wake up before its to late...

  • this is so boring i have to see it because a work !!

  • just because your not proud of your ancestors. dont lie about mine.

  • As smart and advanced as our ancestors were you gotta wonder...how did they not realize that the sun would come up with or without sacrifices? I mean everything they did is truly impressive and all but I just don't get it...

    Either way I love my heritage, gives me bragging rights lol :P

    Viva Mexico!

  • The Spaniards did do a number on the Aztecs, and as a Mexican woman I was raised to have a certain anger towards the Spaniards for this and I know that many Spaniards look down on us as well. (However I think this is so silly given the fact that it happened so long ago). It's so terrible that they destroyed so much of our fascinating culture but I must say that I don't know if I would have wanted to live in a time and place where people were sacrificed to keep god(s) happy on a daily basis.

  • Im glad im mexican! Shows that we got alot of culture! :D

  • @creefirstnation Mexicans have mustashes

  • All of the ruins you see in South and Central America were built by the Viracochas (white 'gods'). The mongrels that lay claim to them are not the builders - they were and are the equilvalent of the subhuman ghetto dwellers who, after the White man has abandoned what he built, are taken over by the beasts. Was Detroit conceived of and built by the negroes who now live in the ruins? Nope. Was Mexico City conceived by the majority mestizos? Nope.

  • @thepathofice you know nothing about aztecs, you white piece of trash, before the spaniards there had never been white people in Mesoamerica. That what you are saying is a fucking lie, this is my history, you cannot know it better than I do.

  • That was really boring but educational

  • fuck spain

  • I see one HUGE mistake here... Aztecs NEVER had facial hair..in fact..no native American or pacific islander had facial hair until the arrival of the Europeans.

  • Not true!!!, that's a complete myth to picture indians as perpetual childs. Native americans in fact had facial hair, not as much as europeans but they did!!!. There are hundreds of representations of bearded men in prehispanic art, mainly old mans, as it was a symbol of wisdom (that's why Quetzalcoatl had beard, not because he was a damn white man!)

  • OMG you're so fucking retarded. WE NEVER HAD FACIAL HAIR!!!!! and NONE OF OUR WRITINGS HAVE EVER HAD A PERSON WITH FACIAL HAIR! You have no idea what's a Quetzalcoatl. The "white bearded" deity? LMAO That's funny 'cause none of our languages even have a word for beard.. trust me I know 'cause I speak a little Nahuatl. NOT TO MENTION Cortez thought that Teotl means "god" which is funny becuase it actually means "spiritual energy... Teotl does NOT equal Theos (god in Latin)

  • the only fucking retarded are YOU, shity product of globalization and "New Age" ideology. Learn to read first, then vomit your stuff. Beards are fully represented in Aztec and Mixtec codices, in painted maya vases, etc. and that DOESN'T MEAN they were whites, they were indians, native americans with beards, specially old men. ¿Have you seen Quetzalcóatl in the murals of Cacaxtla? surely not, you punk.

    Yacatecuhtli is also depicted with beard.

  • You're funny..I am learning Nahuatl and we don't even have a word for beard :P and I don't think Native Americans have RED HAIR as depicted by those red "beards".....green beards?....hmmmm

  • the ONLY person you mentioned that looks like he has an actual beard is Yacatecuhtli..and that is only ONE MAN!...and I am not even sure if that is a beard but that thing under his nose is definitely not a mustache

  • Ha ha! I don't know who is teaching you nahuatl, perhaps a "New Age Shaman". You should learn "Classic Náhuatl" in Mexico.

    Beard or facial hair in different places of the face: Tentzontli, Tetzoniztalli, Yancuictentzontli, Cocotzontli, Camatzontli

    Moustache: Tatlia.

  • By the way, color doesn't matter, they used a lot of paintings on the body and the hair, don't be fool, you're arguing like Afrocentrists who "proof" presence of Blacks with a representation of a person with corporal painting.

  • That still doesn't mean we had a word for beard. I am learning Nahuatl Cuzcatlec :P (similar to Classical Nahuatl but with very different grammar)

  • Ok, it's clear that you're talking from your FAITH, and I'm not here to convince you about anything. The evidences are there.

    On the other hand, my recognition. Keep studying Nahuatl, there should be more people interested.

  • Faith? I'm not even Christian =_=. First some Afrocentric assholes and now you *sigh* man! I' just glad you're not as stupid as those idiots who beleive blacks were here first before my people.

  • really? Show me!

  • umm show me this! Did you know the Native Americans do not have any facial hair what so ever? Same thing goes with the Aztecs, Inkas, and Mayas.

  • u r right a pure native american aboriginal don't have facial hair

  • There we go!

  • Damn white man? Y'know..teh whites DID try to screw up our history but it's really easy to figure out all of the lies with just a bit of Logic..as for we had a lot of gods..I am not sure ...maybe we did or maybe we didn't. I DO know that no person from Hawaii to Tierra del Fuego had facial hair. If you don't believe that whites manipulate history...check out the Virgen de Guadalupe... such a myth is easy to notice.

  • Now I am not saying that all whites who recorded history are Lying like the faggots who created Guadalupe. Cortez though teotl means god out of a Misunderstanding in lanaguge..a lot of other things recorded are also misunderstandings because of the language barrier (not everything is translated correctly). We do know that the MAYANS are polytheistic because 4 of their Codices survived and are now translated correctly (we have Mayan people who are using the witting system now).

  • A lot of the stuff the Spanish said is true but not all..see what I mean?? There are a few lies and misunderstandings.

  • I concur, if you ask any guild down there, as well as any historian, they will say they did not have an facial hair. Look at the Native American 1800 Photos, no facial hair, until the started to inter-great with the europeans

  • Just to mention some examples: Copán- Stela C, Stela 11, Altar T, Altar L,

    Quiriguá Stela A, Stela E, the famous Chamá vases, etc.

    All of them depictions of pre-conquest origins. Americans didn't had beards like vikings, that's a fact, but they had!!! they just didn't used it until old ages. Bishop Landa mentions that yucatec maya (XVI th century) used to shave and "burn" follicles to have no beards.

    Stop the f... myths and do some research!

  • You know I am looking at these images, and I really do not see beards, I just see necklaces, ceremonial necklaces that they wear. Also too, please show me your sources? Because when I was down there, I asked my guide about it, and he said the native Maya do not have facial hair what so ever! The same can be said about the Native American Population back then, how do you explain the Native American Population?

  • What are you? somekind of a fundamentalist guy? are you f... blind?

    I gave you concrete examples and you did not see a shit? only necklaces? ha ha ha!

    I doubt that you see THAT examples.

    "There is no worse blind than that one who doesn't want to see".

    And "guides" who make the tours are not professional anthropologists nor historians. I have seen guides talking about extraterrestrials, Atlantid, and that kind of shit.

    C'mon dude!

  • Wow, you didnt answer my other point, which was then how do you explain Native Americans with no facial hair. What you are say is pretty much like saying the holocaust was a joke!

  • Wow? wow you, man! what the hell's have to do the Holocaust with this?

    In every case the only denier here is you. I'm not saying that all indians had beards, but if you say that NONE of them had beards that's a LIE.

    Stela C Copan have two persons depicted, is the one on the West side who have a beard.

    Look also Stela 10 from Seibal, there´s a Mayan king with moustache.

    What about the other examples?

  • You still didnt answer my question, which was how come we do not see native americans with beards back then?

  • I don't have to answer questions who have ignorance as its basic premise.

    Keep in your faith and dogmas if you want. You're not interested in truth, just to have the last word.

  • okay dude, here is the thing, my Dad is a history professor over at the U of M, and I asked him about it and he says they did not grow beards because of a genetic difference. Now here is the thing, I am assuming your a 15 year old who does not know whats up

  • "The amount of facial hair on a man's face varies from individual to individual, and also between ethnic groups. For example, men from many East Asian, West African or American Indians backgrounds typically have much less facial hair than those of European, Middle Eastern or South Asian descent, with American Indians typically having little to none at all."

  • Ok, daddy's child, good!! this cite proves my point:

    1."little to none at all" leaves margin to "little" as I expressed comments ago; thus, some men in americas had facial hair.

    2. genetic evidence suggests that indian descent is diverse, and not a product of only one Asian "mongolid" wave.

    3. Another two examples: the Olmec "Luchador de Uxpanapa" sculpture, and the "Lápida de Jonuta" relief, (Maya) depicts bearded personages.

    4. You have not fucking idea with whom you're talking...

  • 5. In science, sustaining an idea only by saying "my dad is... at..." is just an example of something called AUTHORITY PHALLACY.

    Get up your ass from imaginary thrones.

  • LOL Ok sure go against a professor, his colleagues have said to me too that they agree. Oh yeah those so called bears look like they are the type of "beards" wore by the Egyptians. Ceremonial purposes. You know I am going to do what the other guy did to you which was, just stop bothering with you, When you swear it shows your ignorance to bring your point across I hope your happy

  • oh yeah who am I talking to? God? Haha probably not. Its funny to see how pissed off you are, so if I where you, I would not respond to this

  • Unfortunetly, you're not me, so I will respond your delusions...

    According to you, Indians didn't knew beards, never saw one, never had one, they didn't knew what was facial hair but... they wore ceremonial ones! Ooook buddy!

    You never responded a single example, and is funny how you talk about your scholars as if they were high priests.

    The main fact here is that you and the other guy seem to be militant and ethnic fanatics (strange in the US, uh?).

    Be happy too!

  • @sesrunner08 Actually some tribes on the western coast were able to grow full beards..

    and some of there artwork and sculpture had beards... so yea...

  • @LobsterPotsticker interesting, lets see it! Is that true about the indigenous people of south americans?

  • @sesrunner08 beards can be seen in "The Codex Nuttall" for mexico.

    In South America (not completely sure if this counts) statues of the god Viracocha have braided sun beards. But as he's a deity that could be simply his sun rays. The Codex Nuttall on the other hand is a History codex of rulers with their clothing indicating status etc

    Quetzalcoatl also has a beard in the "Codex Borgia", but he also has a duckbil and shape shifts into a feather snake so take that as you will.

  • @LobsterPotsticker well it is interested that you bring up Viracocha because whenI was down in peru I was talking with a guide down there, and for shits and giggles I asked him if they could grow facial hair, by that I mean like true indigenous people, and he said no. So maybe he was liyng or not, but it is inter sting to read that the Incas viewed them as gods because Viracocha was white and had a beard, and we can see this through historical records, from the inca and the spanish

  • oh yeah I am looking at stela C, and I do not see any beards

  • YEPPERS!!!!

  • sorry but you don`t have any intonation at all :( .....But the research was pretty good. :D

  • Aztecs just survived because they were good at fighting, and they were a very powerful military force.

    But Mayans survived because they were advanced, but they also had good fighters aswell.

  • No the Aztecs,Mayans,Toltecs,Olmecs and incas were studiers of Astrtronemers and Mathematicians. So not just the Mayans were advanced but pretty much all the tribes before and after the Mayans.

  • that probably explains why mexicans dominate boxing in the lower divisions

  • oh wow this is the soudtrack to shadow of the colossus, no?

  • thanks you guys did a good job ... i'm just reviewing for my testing next week and this provided good information

  • Thanks for making the video so easy to understand! My notes i got from my teacher were kinda not enough info... and the info was hard!

    So i really appreciate you making this vid

  • The Aztec capital was one of the biggest in the world during the 15th Century CE. BTW, Teotihuacán was also the largest in 1500 CE. However, like many of the Great Empires...History has the tendency to repeat itself.

  • Hey psandbergnz, ceomeye, and your ilk!,

    You are a JACKASSES!

  • To the makers of this video,

    Awesome video. You did a very good job. Don´t listen to these jealous euro-trash pussies! I am going to use this video in my classes.

  • I agree with Psandbergnz, but then again this is probably for a school project.

  • Americans tend to speak so poorly with no respect for punctuation and scarcely any contrast. The result is a monotonous mumble.

  • However, I must give credit to the illustrations and photography in this video.

  • You are a snob!

  • love the voices, loose the damn braces oh yeah and ,, I AM THE CHARANGO NINJA!!

  • what you think the United States has learned? Guantanamo bay concentration camps and even camps in the U.S.A of savage Europeans - What makes the europeans so different? Europeans are a lot more savage, beast like in wars than indigenous people ever saw themselves

  • yeah but its not the Aztecs fault that they took land from other tribes. it was the other tribes who would attack the Aztecs first, so its their fault the Aztecs took their land thats how the Aztecs were driven from the Valley of Mexico into Lake Texcoco in the first place, because other tribes attacked them and drove them their. its their fault for attacking them in the first place. So its the other tribes fault that they lost their land, they shouldnt have attacked the Aztecs in da first place

  • so NO the Aztecs werent invaders like the Spaniards. the Aztecs were attacked by other tribes from the Valley and so the Aztecs attacked back and the Aztecs won so they took their land. and the Aztecs would sacrifice mostly prisoners of war, not innocent people. and by the way, the Europeans were the ones who wrote most of todays Pre-columbian history so theyre obviously going to lie exaggerate and twist the truth so they can portray the Indians as savages. eg. 20000 sacrifces a year thats B.S

  • You are so silly, it's almost not worth responding too. For one, prisoners of war are not innocent people? They are ok to kill?

    And the Aztecs killed thousands of people of all types. And they were vicious and took land from other tribes. They used slaves and engaged in human sacrifice.

    Were they a great civilization? Unquestionably, but this habit to white wash non-Europeans is intellectually dishonest.

    There isn't a real difference between these cultures.

    They sought power.

  • yes but they were only over powered because the conquistidors did not fight by the rules of the aztec. the aztecs fight not to kill but to captur the spanish justed killed and for a fact montazuma let the spanish in beliveing they were gods because the road horses

  • The rules? LOL So when the Aztec priest drove his stone knife into the chest of a prisoner of war from one of the less powerful tribes, that was OK?

    Please, the Spanish couldn't have accomplished what they did without the willing support of other tribes that hated the Aztecs for their reign of terror.

    Again, it's just so very typical to paint one group of people, by virtue of their DNA as being morally better than another.

    People are almost always at heart violent.

  • Actually both of you, wozza1066 and TiminPhoenix are completely correct and have identified important military considerations however might I draw your attention to the smallpox epidemic which killed 80% of the Mexico Valley population as being a pretty decisive factor.

  • tlazohcamati  ica amo machiliztli

  • the indians in the u.s. also built huge mound cities and and 2 level, city block long log houses for their clans and we all had wheels, however we didnt have huge beasts of burden for industry, we always knew the world was round unlike the spaniards who thought the world was flat, we alsoi built the first stucco like quarters, and only lived in teepee when following the buffalo, we even gave the idea of a constitution to whites, we all are greater than most whites like to believe.

  • The Spaniards ended this huge civilization.

    Although the majority of the Mexicans we have Spanish and indigenous blood, we hate the Spaniards to destroy the huge civilizations of America. The Spaniards were the Barbarians not the Aztecs.

    The Mexicans we hated more to the Spaniards to destroy Tenoctitlán that to the gringos to rob more than half of our territory

    ¡¡¡My God , why the Moros in the same way did not destroy Spain that the Spaniards did with the towns of America !!!!

  • @cesar300665 The Hispanics (spaniards) Not only stole just a "territory" they stole a whole hemisphere, from Alaska to Argentina is one land, one people!

    Native Indigenous pride. Unity for all indigenous peoples!!!

  • @cesar300665 sí que debe de se nos para destruir la EMIRE español en lugar de nosotros conseguir

    muertos

  • well infact,nezahuacoyotl was a great engineer, thanks to him aztecs built dams and bridges. its amazing when you realize that tenochtitlan had an acueduct system, and in europe , all were dying of a lot of diseases

  • Good Vid. The Aztecs remind me of The Romans, mayas of the greeks etc. Its kind of werid though that they Aquaducts look like the same of the Roman Aquaducts. Also the pictures of the Pyrminds are mayan so yeah just putting it out there

  • yea I actually used pictures of the Roman aqueducts for the effect that Aztecs created that kind of technology with no contact with European culture at all (plus I couldn't find any good picture of Aztec aqueducts haha)

  • @sesrunner08 Tha Aztec/Mexica (Meh-She-Ca) nation are one of the three places in the world where civilization originated without outside help from the outside world, these are known as "pristine civilizations" according to archeologists (the other two are Iraq and China.)

  • Unite to do what? have a huge orgy? : P

  • why don't the freakin archeaologists talk to the locals if they want to understand the past. AMERICAN ABORIGINALS ARE ALIVE AND WELL NOT KILLED OFF LIKE YOUR PEOPLE TEACH YOU> we are all one in the same...brazilian,sioux,iroquio­s,mayan,mexican,american indian callus what you want the fact is we are still here and one day will unite.

  • briliant. just brilian.

  • first off like all native's they had chiefs and bielieved in the great spirit not gods they are nothing like egyption i hate how non native act as if they been here for a long time and know do not believe this crap

  • lol your voice lol hahahahaha lmao this video was made to be a comedy right

  • THE GUY CANT PRONOUNCE WORTH SHIT

  • "Vicious culture"?

  • The title before the final credits reads "The Aztec Civilation" ha

  • hahahaha

  • hahahaha

  • hahahaha

  • i hate when people make properganda out of shit the aztecs where a civilised people onley the europeans spill blood back then and they still are now

  • is it just me or do i hear music from shadow of the colossus?

  • What an excellent way to denigrate the Mexica (Aztec) people and descendents!

    Neji107 is a hero! You guys are protecting your foreign culture and people!

    Obviously, the Youtube user(s) Neji107 is motivated by his/her hatred toward the Indigenous people and culture of the "Americas". If you don't like the continent's Indigenous people then you should go back to your ancestral continent (across the Pacific or Atlantic) if not then respect the diversity of humanity!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 0