Well, you have to remember one thing... in those early days it was all pandemonium and any normal considerations of safety precautions were immediately discarded. Sure, the EPA and Giuliani downplayed the threat. Simply put, people should have been more prepared but they weren't.... And no, you cannot trust the government to tell it to you straight.
Well it just started Judge Alvin hellerstein ruled april 2010, E.P.A. LIED the air was toxic. Nixon empowered E.P.A. 1970 E.P.A. is a government department. 10,000 plus ground zero workers are sick or dying or allready dead from toxic air thyrod cancer, asbestosis, pneumonoconiosis, anthracosis and silicosis, fuck you rudi no asbestes you are a lying Hyenna. The air is safe to BREATH, what a joke....
the test shows how many fibres of asbestos are in a percentage of air space for a person..usually a person wears the device while working...we are talking no exposure is safe...now a freaking cloud of it is somehow acceptable..i tell u what at those levels new york was suppose to be evacuated for months...
sleepy2 is delusional. google the permissible exposure limit for asbestos and multiply that by the asbestos cloud floating around ground zero. asbestos is literally microscopic barbwire it can't be pulverized or destroyed any in any way. There is no herbal cure or homeopathic cure for asbestosis or mesothelioma..
The reoccupancy level for asbestos in the air is .01 fibers per cubic centimeter. Saying "no exposure level is safe" isn't the same as "any exposure is deadly" Everyone in America has asbestos in their lungs, most of us will not die from it.
"That kind of total disregard for the physical wellbeing of one's fellow man simply sickens me." How can you expect Conservatives to have any compassion left over for people who have already been born after exhausting themselves defending and protecting the "pre-born"?!?
The latency period for asbestos related disease is 10 to 40 years, regardless of dose. It's way too soon for those potentially exposed to be showing symptoms from asbestos. I'd be more worried about all the burning plastic fumes.
There's worse things than asbestos exposure. If an asbestos worker gets injured in an abatement project, paramedics go right in the containment. The danger from asbestos is lower than the immediate hazard to the injured person. 9/11 for the first two weeks was a rescue mission, trying to saved trapped people. The asbestos danger was secondary to that.
Nobody thought of air sampling for asbestos for probably a few days. After one or two days, outdoor air sampling most likely was negative for asbestos. Microscopic fibers blow away really easily!
The truth. 40,000 first responers are going down hill fast and the city, state and government are doing NOTHING! Giuliani should be screaming for these people to be helped but instead he talks about how wonderful Bush is during his run to be president in 2008. WTF?
I liked how he stuttered more than usual...but didn't lisp anymore than usual....maybe thats his reaction when he knows he isnt telling the truth.....took one out of bush's bag
It was cheaper to demolish the buildings than to perform abatement, but they would have never received approval to demolish due to the risks involved (i.e. asbestos in the air)
heh...soo what about the hundreds of people that are now dying from chemical infection & lung disease? I'm wondering who conducted the test and how it was done...
They certainly weren't operating on the best information they add. They did need to clean up the crime scene ASAP.
He even admitted that people working on ground zero had bad physical reactions... Yet its best to trust a f&?%&ing 'report' that ended up to be proven utterly wrong and conscious shocking. Serioustly....
At this point, the test showed nothing wrong(paraphrasing). Well from that point and their on out, the tests never showed anything. They should have at one point, but never did. Cover Up is the word, but why? People are dying from the toxic air which was covered up. WHY? Why lie?
Where's the lie? He says their reports didn't show a threat. The reports were incomplete. They needed time--they didn't have time. They were operating on the best information they had.
sure. no asbestos shows up. you don't have to do tests to determine if a fire is hot. you assume it to be so and don't put your hand on it. then if you want the exact temp, you do tests. the same should've taken place on this. don't just assume there was no asbestos, or whatever other harmful dust just because there's no tests that show exact figures. saying the tests showed negligible amounts is an absurdity anyways.
EXPOSED!Listen morons...It is not rocket science to takea aa sample of the dust and to see that, everything in the building was crushed into microscopic particles and our HEWROES where breathing this junk in because the EPA and Giuliani LIED about it....They knew that air wasn't safe to breath BEFIRE they even ran any test....But they had to open wallstreet, so they had to say the air was "safe"...
Well, you have to remember one thing... in those early days it was all pandemonium and any normal considerations of safety precautions were immediately discarded. Sure, the EPA and Giuliani downplayed the threat. Simply put, people should have been more prepared but they weren't.... And no, you cannot trust the government to tell it to you straight.
evillurkswithinusall 1 year ago
Well it just started Judge Alvin hellerstein ruled april 2010, E.P.A. LIED the air was toxic. Nixon empowered E.P.A. 1970 E.P.A. is a government department. 10,000 plus ground zero workers are sick or dying or allready dead from toxic air thyrod cancer, asbestosis, pneumonoconiosis, anthracosis and silicosis, fuck you rudi no asbestes you are a lying Hyenna. The air is safe to BREATH, what a joke....
MrDoverben22 1 year ago
Heh i just love it, those towers were due for asbestos removal and they decided to share the goodness instead, mmmmmmmm lovely fibers
jonnijames 2 years ago
I don't think that the Nuclear reactor is unstable at this moment. Lets wait and see shall we?
TheTMobileDance 3 years ago
I hate Comb-over-ani but I'm going to have to call bullshyt on this vid.
He's not a expert and he said "so far", with all the blatant and endless GOP lies we can do better than this.
JimboTHC 3 years ago
I agree. He's not sure...he makes that clear and he doesn't want anyone to panic until real results appear/
clehneis 3 years ago
wow..did giuliani say tests...
the test shows how many fibres of asbestos are in a percentage of air space for a person..usually a person wears the device while working...we are talking no exposure is safe...now a freaking cloud of it is somehow acceptable..i tell u what at those levels new york was suppose to be evacuated for months...
KRock2000 4 years ago 3
sleepy2 is delusional. google the permissible exposure limit for asbestos and multiply that by the asbestos cloud floating around ground zero. asbestos is literally microscopic barbwire it can't be pulverized or destroyed any in any way. There is no herbal cure or homeopathic cure for asbestosis or mesothelioma..
KRock2000 4 years ago
The reoccupancy level for asbestos in the air is .01 fibers per cubic centimeter. Saying "no exposure level is safe" isn't the same as "any exposure is deadly" Everyone in America has asbestos in their lungs, most of us will not die from it.
sleeepy2 4 years ago
That kind of total disregard for the physical wellbeing of one's fellow man simply sickens me.
junkytime 4 years ago 4
"That kind of total disregard for the physical wellbeing of one's fellow man simply sickens me." How can you expect Conservatives to have any compassion left over for people who have already been born after exhausting themselves defending and protecting the "pre-born"?!?
Rayosun 4 years ago
The latency period for asbestos related disease is 10 to 40 years, regardless of dose. It's way too soon for those potentially exposed to be showing symptoms from asbestos. I'd be more worried about all the burning plastic fumes.
sleeepy2 4 years ago
There's worse things than asbestos exposure. If an asbestos worker gets injured in an abatement project, paramedics go right in the containment. The danger from asbestos is lower than the immediate hazard to the injured person. 9/11 for the first two weeks was a rescue mission, trying to saved trapped people. The asbestos danger was secondary to that.
sleeepy2 4 years ago
They why not just say that instead of citing fictional "reports" claiming that the air is safe when it clearly wasn't?
Swmorgan77 4 years ago
Nobody thought of air sampling for asbestos for probably a few days. After one or two days, outdoor air sampling most likely was negative for asbestos. Microscopic fibers blow away really easily!
sleeepy2 4 years ago
Man is it ever "irritating" to have aeresolized exploded concrete and asbestos harden in your lungs and kill you.
Swmorgan77 4 years ago
asbestos is a mineral, not a chemical.
aldoc76 4 years ago
Check out the video "CFR / NAU & 2008 Presidential Candidates" Thanks!
willietheraildog 4 years ago 2
The truth. 40,000 first responers are going down hill fast and the city, state and government are doing NOTHING! Giuliani should be screaming for these people to be helped but instead he talks about how wonderful Bush is during his run to be president in 2008. WTF?
OneoftheImmortals 4 years ago 4
I liked how he stuttered more than usual...but didn't lisp anymore than usual....maybe thats his reaction when he knows he isnt telling the truth.....took one out of bush's bag
trevorj05 4 years ago 2
Ever notice that the only buildings to be destroyed in NYC that day were all of the buildings on the land owned by the Port Authority of NY & NJ?
Tomb60 4 years ago
By defending Giuliani, you help to justify his lies.
They all knew the building had asbestos in it because they already did a cost analysis to remove the asbestos.
CARSONB43 4 years ago 5
It was cheaper to demolish the buildings than to perform abatement, but they would have never received approval to demolish due to the risks involved (i.e. asbestos in the air)
dUbyaBinLyin 4 years ago 2
True..........Silverstein?
CARSONB43 4 years ago
Good point.
Swmorgan77 4 years ago
HAHAHA peoples eyes getting burned but it's safe, this guy needs to get his head fixed.
pokersavage1 4 years ago 2
"tests that we have done... doesn't show any chemical agent that we have to be concerned about".
What test, and where is it and who did it?
Swmorgan77 4 years ago
heh...soo what about the hundreds of people that are now dying from chemical infection & lung disease? I'm wondering who conducted the test and how it was done...
They certainly weren't operating on the best information they add. They did need to clean up the crime scene ASAP.
He even admitted that people working on ground zero had bad physical reactions... Yet its best to trust a f&?%&ing 'report' that ended up to be proven utterly wrong and conscious shocking. Serioustly....
Norun1 4 years ago
At this point, the test showed nothing wrong(paraphrasing). Well from that point and their on out, the tests never showed anything. They should have at one point, but never did. Cover Up is the word, but why? People are dying from the toxic air which was covered up. WHY? Why lie?
magaga7 4 years ago
He said they did test that showed nothing, if they did test they would have found something.
Raaandom 4 years ago
Where's the lie? He says their reports didn't show a threat. The reports were incomplete. They needed time--they didn't have time. They were operating on the best information they had.
rdanneskjold11 4 years ago
sure. no asbestos shows up. you don't have to do tests to determine if a fire is hot. you assume it to be so and don't put your hand on it. then if you want the exact temp, you do tests. the same should've taken place on this. don't just assume there was no asbestos, or whatever other harmful dust just because there's no tests that show exact figures. saying the tests showed negligible amounts is an absurdity anyways.
Thrashaero 4 years ago 2
I wonder why nobody has asked Rudy why he didn't go to the Command Center that NYC paid millions of dollars to convert the 23rd floor of WTC 7 ?
Tomb60 4 years ago 2
EXPOSED!Listen morons...It is not rocket science to takea aa sample of the dust and to see that, everything in the building was crushed into microscopic particles and our HEWROES where breathing this junk in because the EPA and Giuliani LIED about it....They knew that air wasn't safe to breath BEFIRE they even ran any test....But they had to open wallstreet, so they had to say the air was "safe"...
8real 4 years ago