Added: 3 years ago
From: blacktreemedia
Views: 212,794
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,037)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Is Spike Lee a bigot?

  • i stayed up till 4 when this movie was on

  • This looks really really interesting. And that's coming from a white guy who usually reacts badly to movies about african americans.

  • @AtrumMixer

    you know it does look interesting but its freakin spike lee....the biggest history twisting racist in hollywood.

  • hmm. I see. Now that piece of information enhanced my cerebral strategy centrum quite a bit. Thanks a lot.

  • This movie is realistic, weather people like it or not.

  • THE HEAD OF THE MOON GODESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    DO YOU PEOPLE REALISE WHAT THIS MOVIE HAS JUST SHOWN TO YOU?

  • @DONJUAN494 NO..PLEASE ENLIGHTEN US...SERIOUSLY..

  • What a great film by Spike Lee and someone has to tell these stories even if slightly fictional otherwise it's Hollywood bullshit 24/7. We should remember that there were many brave people Black, Red, Brown and White and in WW2. The film was not meant to create Black and white discussions on YouTube just to enlighten people. Black soldiers fought in the Civil War also and both Black and White people died together for Civil Rights. For a positive future the past cannot be forgotten......

  • Actually, I really enjoyed this movie. I found it refreshing, deep, and has many layers to it. It shows the many different sides of the African-Americans, the Germans, the and the Italians.

  • This movie is a pile of shit

  • @tantorss No one says the war was all about blacks. It portrays a specific black infantry and their trials and revelations during the war. Anyway, people who usually get obsessed with race are never rational in their thoughts. When I first watched this film, I didn't take it like it was glorifying blacks. Try reading on James McBride's novel of the same name or his biography then maybe you would understand what the story really portrays.

  • I started to wonder when the americans used black soldiers within world war 2? im not a racist, actually i am black myself!

  • oh damn, i thought i was here for the band hahaha woooooops. awkward.

  • damn commercial causing all this shit. we're here for the music people! it's okkkkkkkkkay

  • spike lee makes a fictional movie where they talk about white people being racist. lol this whole movie shows that Black people didnt do anything "heroic" or movie worthy. I cant stand this whole black people are extremely racist but its okay.

  • @xplzf

    You need to research the Buffalo units. Uh, wait that would involve you READING and white folks don't do that too well.

    Never mind. You're just more proof that there just ain't no way to beat stupid!

  • @BlackTruthForever nice one. Well first of dont say "you White folks' like were from another planet. I am in no way racist. 2nd, why do you assume white people dont read? Spike lee got mad at clint Eastwood for not adding in any afro american into his ww2 war movie. So spike lee thaught that he show him that black people did do something. So why did he go make a fictional movie? why not make a "Buffalo Unit" movie? I can tell your an uneducated, racist who thinks PRO BLACK and al sharp is right.

  • @xplzf

    Of course you're from another world --Planet Stupid: Population 1.

    There were a LOT of African Americans who took part in WW2, and in MANY places. But since you get all your "knowledge" about black people from Hollywood you actually have the nerve to say something as dumb as they "didn't do anything heroic."

    That you even say that proves you know absolutely nothing about what black people did in that war.

    As I said, try READING up on it so you don't embarrass yourself again.

  • just another american movie trying to display the heroeism of its military.. its getting boring.. band of brothers, black hawk down, saving private ryan, this one, saints and soldiers, gods and generals, we were soldiers..

  • very boring movie

  • Comment removed

  • assholes saying this movie is inaccurate, Miracle at St. Anna is based on a novel of the same name, so Spike Lee just directed the film he didn't write. SMFH at the dumbasses who dont do research before making statements

  • @CLS718 "SMFH"?

  • if you think about what this chick said is pretty true in this movie

  • IMBD has this as 6.0, it deserves much more, its such a good movie though it is very long.

  • Hmmm... certainly few dealing with the subject have been mainstream or box office hits, but there have been a number of films about black soldiers in WWII, the Tuskeegee Airmen comes most vividly to my mind.

  • think about haow they treated not only black but the native americans and the spanish. nlacks were not the only ones who got treated bad. but the military at least the army does, tells the story of black soldiers during these times. my brother got a dvd about it

  • The us military didn't intergrate it's units until 1948, but there were all black units such as the Tuskegee airmen, the 761st tank battalion that served under Gen. Patton the Montford Point Marines that served at Iwo Jima, and the 92nd infantry(The Buffalo Soldier) depicted in Miracle At St. Anna, and many others that fought in Europe that are lost to history, and while they didn't fight side by side with their white counter parts, they did fight in the same theater of operation.

  • historyplace(dot)com/ unitedstates/ aframerwar/index (dot)html

  • Jesus, another American made WWII film... aren't there enough shit Hollywood films on the subject?

  • @Karelwolfpup no there are not enough movies about the black and hispanic soldiers who fought in this war. it really isnt about the war. spike lee said it was an answer to those two movies that clint eastwood did.

  • @mjjcng8958 so it's a war film that's not about the war, but Spike Lee's version of Spielberg's message driven Saving Private Ryan that happens to be set in a war? even less reason to see it frankly.

    I also don;t understand how Spike Lee is answering Clint Eastwood's pair of movies about the battle of Iwo Jima, what question was he asking in that? I thought "Letters from Iwo Jima" was a refreshingly compelling look at the Japanese part of that battle.

  • @Karelwolfpup i dont think this is a version of saving private ryan this story is based on a book that is a fictitious book. what i meant by answer to clint movie is that he made it b/c he felt that black soldiers are never portryed in ww2 movies.

  • any movie with a black guy and a gun is good

  • comment if this movie is/looks good or bad...only a few words, don't have to go beyond and fuck everything up. Its a story and it happens to look pretty nice.

  • ¡ White people stop hating....is enough!!

  • Why looks the wehrmacht so fresh and clean in all that films....that looks so cheap!

  • The trailer bests the movie in every way.

  • A load of Jewey rubbish. Spike sucks Jews' balls every day to pay his mortgage.

  • Put "a" between "S" and 't", and reed the whole word, and you will know the true message of the movie

  • this movie was so damn perfect

  • leave it to a fucking scumbag like spike lee to paint his own version of history..there were no black divisions fighting in the St. Anna area.They were all white..and here's spike spinning his own BS version.The same spike lee who called both spielburg and eastwood racist because they didnt have any blacks in saving private Ryan or letters from iwo jima..racist because they told the truth. The US didnt intergrate until the 50's and no black divisions fought there...Its all BULLSHIT.

  • @shellback1970 who cares. its a great film.

  • @hopover1 I care and you should too. Why? because its an insult to the people who WERE there. when someone adds people into what a historical event that THEY werent there. It remakes history into some thing that isnt true.

    *

    All because spike lee want people to recognize the contibutions of the black man. I can find no fault in that in itself . But I DO find fault in just making shit up and passing it off. when its historicaly innacurate.

  • @shellback1970

    Well Sir, I hope you complained also about Rambo helping the Talibans against the evil Soviets. Was this historically good and accurate to do this? Did you need to wait for Spike Lee to discover that generaly speaking hollywood has messed up too often when treating the subject of war?

  • @atosh76 in Rambo 3 Rambo was fighting the Russians in a place where a real war took place.yet it was a FICTIONAL BATTLE.

    On the other hand St Anna was a REAL BATTLE. American troops where really there fighting. Spike Lee added a spin to the story.

    When someone makes a movie about a real battle. people tend to want the movie to depict what really happened. Make it as accurate as possible. Thats why Speilberg didnt have token black guys in Saving Private Ryan. US forces were segregated then.

  • @atosh76

    Well, for a start it wasn't the Taliban.

  • @shellback1970 i agree, this trailer confuses me bigtime...italians would never welcome black people into their home, especially not in those days. Complete bullshit.

  • @shellback1970 Hah ah ha ha ha hha hahh wow, unbelievable, thats what you and some of these diabolical ranting racist self indulged fools do all day and all fucking night. You motha fuckers better get use to history being written in it proper context clowns, and also get used to America browning. White racist or bigoted Lepers have got to be the most miserable lot of Perdition I have ever come in contact with. I got yet another word that sums you up "Tragic"

  • @davisismail1comcast Im not a racist asshole im a realist..look it up you fucking moron.

    The US didnt intergrate its forces until the 50's ITS A FACT.

    THAT MEANS the wouldnt be any black troops in an area where white units are fighting..

    They kept them separate. Knowing that dosent make me a racist.

    So take your race card and shove it up your ass fucktard....

  • @shellback1970 actually you are right and wrong, the 92nd Infantry was all black with the exception of the commanding officers and they did see combat in Tuscany, they worked with the Italian Partisan that was a against Mussolini and Italy's involvement in the war, The 92nd fought of the German army allowing the Italian Partisan to assinated Mussolini in MIlan who was under German protection. THey were the first blacks allowed to fight. It is all written and can be found easily in books.

  • @shellback1970 My great Uncle was in the 92nd Infantry and died in combat in Tuscany, we are black. My boyfriend is from Rome, Italy and it is commonly taught in Italian schools, it is sad that the Europeans know more about our history than most Americans. The Army did dissolve segregation in the 50's allowing blacks and whites to serve in the same units and dwell together but there had been blacks fighting since the American Revolution.

  • @shellback1970 oh, hold on my cousin just corrected me, he is a Lieutenant, he said there were actually Blacks and Whites that fought together when the 92nd Infantry needed more trained infantry men, they incorporated white air-gunners into the 92nd and it was jokingly referred to as the Rainbow Infantry for a while. SO I guess you are just wrong and I was wrong. Blacks and Whites did fight together in the war. The white air-gunners were close by and easier to get..

  • @kimrabb Your cousin is WRONG. the 92nd or BUFFALO slodiers were an ALL BLACK division..if there were any whites that served it was NOT a permanent position.

    What we have here are WHITES going into Black div. NOT the other way around.

    What your cousin is pointing out is no more relavant than the FACT the all black 54th Mass. from the civil war was led by WHITE officers.

    Its not the same as white PFC and Black PFC assigned PERMENENTLY fighting side by side.

  • @shellback1970 actually after the units that fought for us in the civil war they were desegregated but then woodrow wilson re segregated them again till after ww2

  • @stntx04 Desegregated If you count black enlisted being led by white officers. The accual white pfc fighting next to a black pfc while both in the same unit didnt come until the KOREAN war.

  • @shellback1970 : I looked it up! And look at what I found!

    historyplace(dot)com/ unitedstates/ aframerwar/index (dot)html

  • @mowriter Heres what I looked up... Executive Order 9981 ordered the integration of the armed forces in 1948. the accual intergration didnt happen untill the korean war in the 50....

    So what I was saying is right on the money...

  • @shellback1970 : no one's denying full integration. the question is whether or not black troops were in Italy during ww2. my link affirms they were. I too stand by my assertion.

  • @mowriter Were both talking about differnt things then. yes there were Blcks there. that is not the point i was arguing. the point i was argueing was that there were no all black divisions in the St. Anna battle.

  • @shellback1970 True. The military still looked down on African-Americans during that time. Nazi POW camps treated the black soldiers better than the Americans.

  • @visionimagify So true.You are very correct. There was a fire during ww2 I think in Port Chicago. Munitions were being loaded onto a ship and they expolded.killing 320 over 200 of them black enlisted sailors. instead of fixing the problem the Navy painted the scenrio as THIER fault. After the clean up reloading resumed. with the same unsafe process. some of the workers quit knowing it was unsafe. they were charged with mutiny and dishonorably discharged. I think had they been white... no charges

  • @shellback1970 the "race card" is a term of use wich only white people use.

  • @shellback1970 some people are just thick mate - unfortunately there's lots of em.

  • @davisismail1comcast

    Wow. Go fuck yourself. Hard.

    All he did was cite the facts, and you're calling him a "WHITE racist"? The US didn't desegregate it's armies until 1948 or so, it's a FACT. So keep that "WHITE racist" shit to yourself. You get racists in every society, every culture, and every country, and if you haven't learnt that by now, I suggest you take your head out of your ass and wake up.

  • mmmmmmmmmmm NA.......

  • Pure fiction. Another movie focused on tokenism. This movie should have been about the Red Ball Express. They never lost a truck to an enemy watermelon or bucket of KFC.

  • I like axis sally in this movie. To bad the U.S couldn't have helped the Germans, we would be rid of you know who and there would be peace in the middle east!!

  • saw this today

  • GUYS,this god made the world so the white,black and colered could enjoy. i dont see a reason to be racist. Black ppl are nice as hell wen u get to know them! White ppl cant say much about the black or colored cuz u guys also do drugs and rape so stap talking traSh

  • This movie only got two stars, but I really enjoyed it.

  • Comment removed

  • OMG, What does he know !?

  • 31 people that watched this are members of the Ku Klux Klan, lol!!

  • This looks fkn gr8.

  • 31 assholes

  • im not sure in schindlers list the nazis were shown worse than in this movie i dont think this is why because i think the nazis were shown here like in the most ww2 movies and germany today wants to show to the new generations that nazis are shit

  • Comment removed

  • why didnt this movie appear in germany????

  • @konstans1991 y do u think

  • @ThePokeyPictures I dunno. maybe u can explain me :)

  • @konstans1991 b/c germany was involved heavily with the nazi party and showing it in germany would make them look very bad

  • @ThePokeyPictures but movies like schindlers list , savin priate ryan, band of brothers and many more ww2 movies where also published in germany so i dont think its because germany shouldnt look bad...

  • @konstans1991 yes but this film depicted some very heavy stuff, toddlers being killed was in it, and just the way it was made, made nazis looks worse than those other films

  • @ThePokeyPictures Dude the stuff they showed is what actually happend in that time.

  • @puregraffiti1 i know they were worse, but the way it was made germany didnt like

  • I really wanted to like this movie, that showed the black soldiers in ww2, but i was left with this pease of shit mess of a movie, They deserv much better then THIS!

  • HAHA the nazi propaganda chick at the beginning could probably find a job working for the Daily Show or CNN.

  • another American Rambo movie but here Rambo is black...

  • Hitler was right, this is BS hollywood garbage. Now we have communists crawling inside and out just waiting for the opportunity to steal our free speech and right to own a gun. Haha, Hitler has been vindicated and his methods revealed to be necessary.

  • @EuroAmericanReich VIVA FIDEL!

  • If Spike Lee made this movie, there must be some of his underlying racism in it.....

  • cant wait to watch this one

  • so it has a few historical inaccuracies big deal

    it was still a great movie XD!

  • Comment removed

  • @DemeGill

    And you are a dumb Nigger who can't even write!

  • @WUNDENFLAMME He is a dumb nigger that cant even write? Have you SEEN your grammar in most of your comments? Racism is never right, no matter how much you try and say it is.

  • @TheHaloManiac25 you know dumb niggers faught for the food on your table....first think before you talk

  • @THETRUEPATRIOT1 I am really confused as to what you are thinking. I am not the racist one, I was replying TO the racist.

  • @TheHaloManiac25 oh im sorry

  • @THETRUEPATRIOT1 No problem, and sorry Im replying so late, havent signed in for awhile.

  • @WUNDENFLAMME No thats just you being a racist asshole. A black dog and a white dog are no different. a black dog does not bite more people. they are the same except for skin pigmentation. so how is a black man different from a white man? If you hate black people so much why are you on a youtube vid about a movie about black directed by a black activist? seems to me you just like conflict. must not of been huged when you where little.

  • @DROPBODIES718

    No. dead wrong.

    We are not equal.

    White man has an avarage IQ of 106. The black man has an avarage IQ of 68.

    That's why the white man builds civilizations and the black man clay hutts and is criminal.

    2ndly it's not only the skincolour, it's also the face structur and body structur.

    Black Albinos still don't look like Whites.

    And it's simply a lie to diplay blacks as noble resuers in movies, when in reality they rob, rape and kill you!

  • @WUNDENFLAMME Thats why mankind started out in africa?

    about the IQ really? what white supremisest site did you get that bull shit off of? You say whites have a higher IQ, but then you mispell half the words in your bullshit defense for your racism. Sonner or later the world will be all one big race. more and more people are marrying and breeding interacil babies. You a sad excuse for a human being. you are probly just mad that you wife left you for a black man. I hope you have a daughter

  • @WUNDENFLAMME marrys a black man with a P.H.D. I bet your a football loving man aren't you? Bet your favorite team consists of mostly balcks. but its ok that they are black aslong as they win. bet when they lose you call them niggers right?

  • @WUNDENFLAMME why dont you read blood germs and steel. It explains why Europe produced so many great and powerful nations while "the black man clay huts". Its actually based on chance of sorts. Its interesting, and should with a bit of luck dispell your frankly racist opinions.

  • @WUNDENFLAMME some one really needs to do u something... oh yeah n case u didnt know somewhere down the line im pretty sure your family raped few black women sooo embrace the nigga n you

  • @WUNDENFLAMME wooooooooooow im sooo s orry your people didnt teach you any better but actually withe people crackers as i would like to say are the ones that steal kill and rape but its coverd!!!!!!!!!! and white people just blame black people if you didnt know and something else yes blacks don the same thing but dont sit here and say that your sooooo much better than anyone must likely u grow up in some trailer park fucking ur couisns

  • I really loved this film, great act,nice story...keep the spirit...5/5 for me as I watched it at Free Movie Zone . n e t

  • it is not a good movie at all,...too much talkin and michael ealy looks like a dick here

  • @koureen0930 Spike Lee's movies are always like that, lol.

  • @koureen0930 his movies are always like that but this ones better

  • I love this movie all of u uneducated bastards,faggots and racist punks SHUT THE FUCK UP...

  • i fucking love this movie

  • This movie could have and should have been better. Most of it was bullshit. Some parts had potential, but overall it was whack. Saving Pvt Ryan was much better

  • @Talmadge33 I m italian the movie shows 2 huge historic mistakes.

    1. in S.Anna there were not americans and any allias infact germans could do the massacre without any problem.

    2. Fascists lead the nazists in S.Anna to commit the massacre not partisans. Partisans during the massacre were in the mountains. So fascists could lead nazists there to do the massacre.

  • @Talmadge33 allias arrived after the massacre in S.Anna and also the Buffalo with black soldjers arrived in Tuscany after and they were lead to the mountains by partisans just like other allias long all Italy cause allias didnt know the italian territory so they were helped by group of partisans to explore and to know better all the italian land. They lived in mountains along partisans too.

  • @Talmadge33 often partisans gave to allias maps of italian territory or they were in radio contact with them to accelerate the mission to capture the nazists and fascists as prisoners or kill them.

    So the movie was been an insult to the resistence in Italy. Spike Lee offended us very much with his movie. Sorry for fans of the movie but the historic truth was been an other.

  • The waffen SS was an all volunteer unit from all over europe and world, its goal was to stop the commie red jews. that was hitlers goal too, he had no choice in the matter.they took half of uerope in collusion with the criminals churchill,roosenvelt,eisenhowe­r and the valiant stalin.m,this is a novel, it might be good to have a direct professional history i..e. unbiased and true account not propaganda, history of the human civilization since babylon egypt.

  • Every military unit is a voluntary. The distinction that I am making is that the SS had a very low approval rate before 1941. Its ranks in its early years were mainly made up of politically indoctrinated Aryans who fundamentally supported Nazism.

    Throughout their childhoods these people were brainwashed and the Hitler Youth of 1935 were raised to be soldiers.

    What made the early Waffen SS so elite. Was that they picked you not you picking them. The restrictions loosened as the war went along.

  • And you call Stalin valiant? That shows how little you know. Stalin was a murdering psychopath? He killed more of his own people than Hitler. He ordered all Soviet soldiers who retreated from battle to be murdered by their superior officers. He murdered political prisoners and politicians who didn't see it his way.

    Stalin was of much a butcher as Hitler. Maybe worse. Hitler's body count ranges from 6-12 million, Stalin's exceeds 25 million.

  • some of this really happened like the atrocity at st anna

  • @HaggenPaggan26 wtf is wrong with you? think of one WW2 film where it talked about the black soldiers in that war. gtfo off youtube and go to school. i could say the same thing about white people. hey why are all the whites glorified in ww2 films? blacks fought in it to you racist cunt go fuck yourself.

  • Very little blacks fought in WW11. Less than 10,000.

  • You know punk kids like you make me sick!!!! Always running your mouth because you think you know something about history because you got a piece of paper from a bunch of stoned hippies (if you even have that). Hey, I got a great Idea pick up a history book. Blacks have served, fought and died in disproportionate numbers in every war this country has ever fought. And to do it they had to fight the enemy on the front and the racist at home. Why don't you go to stormfront where you belong.

  • @bigjohnowens Correct me if I am wrong, but George Washington's Colonial army 1/8 black?

    and in the "CIVIL" war rich plantation owners did not want to fight and had their slaves fight for them

    not completly sure though.

  • @DROPBODIES718Washington's army was 1/6 black and there were black who fought on both sides of the Civil War overwelmingly for the North though.

  • @bigjohnowens That is complete bullshit. Blacks did not die in disproportionate numbers. 718 blacks died in WW11 out of 300,000 US dead. And only 12% of all US deaths in Vietnam were Black. 86% were Caucasian and 1.2% were of other races.

    The notion that blacks died in disproportionate numbers in any US conflict is pure Myth.

  • @StonewallJackson26 And oh you were there right? Roughly 12 million Americans served in WWII, but only until recently would any one hear that over half a milion were black. With a few exceptions here and there you would't think they served at all according to "pop culture" Where did you get the state on WWII?!? I know where you got the ones on Vietnam. Your death total is off by 116,000 which makes me question the first number more.

  • @bigjohnowens Look it up you moron. The facts are right in your face but you refuse to look at them. Google everything that I said and you will find that it s true. 718 Black US soldiers died in WW11: fact. 12% of all US deaths in Vietnam were black: fact.

    If you don't believe me look it up.

  • @StonewallJackson26 Listen Schmuck! I have Goggled, checked all of my personal books and even a few text books left over from college. As I stated you are off by 116,000 total deaths (416,000 American soldiers were killed in WWII) You said 300,000 and 718. You got 12% from the CACF report from 1993 and a speech by Gen. Westmorland in 1986. Again, other than you ass where did you get you WWII numbers?!?!

  • @bigjohnowens Fuck you. Take your leftist propaganda and stick it up your ass. No African Americans suffered disproportionately in any US war

  • @StonewallJackson26 Go to google. Type in " How many African Americans died in WW11." You will find that your first source on the page will state that 718 died as infantry soldier. The total African American deaths including the Navy is between 2000- 3000. That is not disproportionate. That is less than 1 and 1000. And blacks made up 10% of the US pop. in the 40's.

  • @StonewallJackson26 So 2- 3000 blacks died in WW11 out of over 300,000 American deaths total. That is less than 1%. If blacks make up 10% of the pop. how is that disproportionate. Secondly, it is fact that 86% of combat deaths in Vietnam were Caucasian.

  • @StonewallJackson26 When I said 718 I forgot to mention that that was only Army deaths. I forgot to include the blacks that died in the Navy. But even including Navy deaths. It still doesn't make African American casualties disproportionate.

  • @StonewallJackson26BULLSHIT! I give you facts and you give me bullshit! If you went to college you know damn well do dare cite a fact if you can back it up. 12.5% of the men who died were black and according to the 1970 cenus the black population was just over 11% (look that one up ya mo mo) not a big difference, but a difference none the less. I will correct myself though over one million blacks served in WWII. You should stick with the Civil War Stonewall you are pulling stats out of your ass

  • @bigjohnowens Are you going to start stating actual facts or are you going to keep ramming your liberal slant down everyone's throat. Quit trying to turn American wars into a White against Black issues. I have only given you two facts.

    1. 2- 3000(less than 1% overall) American deaths in WW11 were black

    2. 12% of all Americans killed in Nam were blacks.

    Those are both historically accurate.

    So how am I pulling them out of my ass?

  • @StonewallJackson26 This isn't a Conservative vs Liberal issue (I am a traditional American conservative by the way.) This isn't even so much a black vs. white issue. This is about the contributions of a segment of our society being more or less ignored historically and the debate that this video clip has caused on Youtube over the past sever month. Please take some time and read the previous posts. Also I proved my number on Nam (12.5 dead Vs 11.12 pop) you still haven't explained your 2-3000

  • @bigjohnowens Explained my 2-3000? Just look it up.

    I am just corrected you on an incorrect statement you made. Blacks in WW2 or Nam did not die in disproportionate numbers. That has been a made up myth which numbers do not back up.

  • @StonewallJackson26 You couldn't even tell me where your stats on Vietnam came from! I had to give you the answer! I have already told you your WWII ESTIMATES are off. It just like college, don't site a fact unless you can prove where it came from. The 12.5% comes from CACF report of 1993 and from Gen. Westmorland c. 1986. 11.12% comes from the 1970 census. I didn't bring numbers in to this, you did. Back them up or give us all a break and shut up.

  • @bigjohnowens Ok. What is the difference between 12% and 12.5%? You don't need to split hairs. 

  • @StonewallJackson26 thats cause they stupid hahaha

  • @StonewallJackson26 Oh "fuck you" you can't back yourself up with facts so the answer is "fuck you stick it up you ass" To quote Dennis Hopper from the movie Speed: Oh! In two hundred years we've gone from "I regret but I have one life to give for my country" to "Fuck you!"? I wish Stonewall Jackson was alive. He would give you the back of his hand and wash you mouth out with some lye soap.

  • @bigjohnowens

    Hell yeah!

    Good point.

  • @bigjohnowens GJ making up nonsense about black service in military then calling anyone who disagrees with you racist. What a garbage argument that is almost a century old. Whites carry blacks on their backs just like we have for over 2 centuries, and in retaliation all we get is violent gang crimes.

  • @EuroAmericanReich I stand behind my statement.That's not my opinion it's fact! Pick up a history book. Put your 6th grade education to the test and prove me wrong or go to stormfront and feed them that BS. I'm sure they will eat it up like candy.

  • @bigjohnowens As a history student, all I can do is concur.

  • @Arturith I glad you see the point I have been trying to make for months. Thank you.

  • @bigjohnowens What history book exactly? Do you even know? Or are you spouting random statements? Why bring up storm front 6th grade and all this nonsense? Oh that's right, to fill the void of your ignorance.

  • @EuroAmericanReichRight, just as I suspected you would do you have done a "great" job proving your point as I have challenged you to do. Instead of spouting general racist rhetoric, why don't you read some of the post I have made especially those at stonewalljackson26 and bring yourself up to speed and find out what my statements are even about. I need more than 500 characters to bring you up to speed.

  • @bigjohnowens I didn't say anything racist at all in my last statement. You are as dumb as a box of rocks. Using the term racist to dodge the fact I asked you to point out any of your magical sources.

  • @EuroAmericanReich What magical source?! It's called an education. You use to be able to get a good taxpayer supported one before the liberals took over the public education system. No! I refuse to believe your this stupid. You do realize that your comment not only reek of racism they're just plain ignorant. Start with something light; Setting the Record Straight: American History in Black and White

    by David Barton

  • @bigjohnowens Why don't you read Churchill Hitler and the unnecessary war by Patrick Buchanan? Also it's not "Your this stupid" it would be "You're". You call anyone who disagrees with you racist and stupid, that makes you a NIGGER.

  • Comment removed

  • @EuroAmericanReich Finally the truth!!! The real reason why I knew I would never be able to have an intelligent debate with you. Another LEFT WING National Socialist angry at the whole world for your short coming. I can't get a loan because of the Jews. All these illegal spics is why I can't find a job. All these niggers taking up welfare is why there is nothing left for me. ANOTHER FAILURE protecting himself with racism. Well you proved me wrong, you really are that stupid!!!

  • @bigjohnowens Left wing National Socialist? You don't know dick about history, Communists changed their "titles" to socialist, progressive, liberal, anything to distract people from the fact they are communist. NAZIS on the other hand always enjoyed the right to own a gun and the right to own a private business (Volkswagen, Mercedes) You don't know anything about Nazism you need to stop making crap up. All you do is make crap up and call anyone that says you do racist.

  • @EuroAmericanReich Yes Nazi Germany "a bastion of freedom" as long as you keep your mouth shut and do what your told. Communist changed the title? Do you even know what NSDAP stands for? Go look it up! Furthermore, who the hell are you calling a communist?!?! No I for God, Mom, The American Flag, (and the constitution that's why were able to have this conversation) Apple pie! I guess anyone who disagrees with you is a communist.

    

  • @EuroAmericanReich Your so obsessed with Communist Vs. Nazis I wanted to do some comparisons.Two weeks ago you made a comment about Nazis and socialism, I responded, but I want to further back up my point In 1944, Ludwig von Mises published: Omnipotent Government: The Rise of the Total State and Total War. One of his lesser know works, but still very interesting.

  • @EuroAmericanReich The difference between the systems, wrote Mises, is that the German pattern "maintains private ownership of the means of production and keeps the appearance of ordinary prices, wages, and markets." But in fact the government directs production decisions, curbs entrepreneurship and the labor market, and determines wages and interest rates by central authority. "Market exchange," says Mises, "is only a sham."

  • @bigjohnowens how in the HELL does Nazi policy curb entrepreneurship? They invented most of the technology that makes the world modern....Electronic computers atomic energy synthetic oil rockets...Mises is obviously full of crap.

  • @EuroAmericanReichWell, you tell me then. What's the difference between the government owning everything and private ownership in name only with total government control of how those resources are used? The Nazi's WERE Socialist. I am a Capitalist! I believe that you would have like the Nazi's to have been Capitalist because your are a Capitalist too or at least one living in the closet so to speak. However, the facts are not on your side of this argument.

  • @bigjohnowens The Nazis were not socialist they had private economy, you are wrong completely just deal with it. Italy had it's own private companies, so did Japan, Franco Spain, etc. You are just wrong on every levely.

  • @EuroAmericanReich You might want to make yourself familiar with the 25 Point Plan adopted by the party in 1920. This plan called for the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into corporations. Private ownership did continue under the Nazi however what could be done with those resources did not. Please don't give me your opinion how about some facts.