Added: 4 years ago
From: lepra01
Views: 957,990
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3,117)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The movie is not a Russian production actually, a culture institute of Mongolia made it. I'm not aware of the details but im sure Mongolians deserve the credit for this great movie.

  • Cengiz Han aslen bir Türk hükümdardır ancak çok çok sert kuralları vardır bir köyde bir hırsızlık olduğu zaman köydeki herkesi öldürürdü o yüzden ülkesi çok düzenliydi askerleriyle büyük oranda Türklerden oluşmaktaydı şimdi kimi arkadaşlar Türk değil diyecek ama bu Türklerle beraber devlet kurduğu gerçeğini değiştirmez

  • elite cavaliersssss

  • HOW dare they change the language!!!! RAAAAGEEE!!! And its all out of order....Was such a good movie too....Fail upload lol but points for trying lad.

  • The guy at 2:52 is laughin his ass off

  • It's a very fine film, so far as films go. Criticisms that it was made to make money are silly: all films are made to make money - they're essentially business investments. If the history is twisted somewhat - so is history in nearly all film, particularly American ones. Historical figures should be judged by the time and circumstances in which they lived, not ours. The Great Khan was no better and certainly no worse than other mighty conquerors throughout history.

  • why didn't they just attached the blades to the horse instead of carried it with both hands.

  • waste of time. hate this movie. made for pure money

  • hate this movie

  • This movie is worst movie ever in history. Twisted whole history. They needed to study history before they make it up!!!!! Actors can't actually speak mongolian. All of them Chinese actors. Even don't look like Mongolian. This movie is insult to Mongolian nation. Chingis khan had great history, they made up whole thing. He had 3 sons from his first wife.

    Real shame. They was no need to twist or make it up. History itself is very intriguing.

  • This movie is worst movie ever in history. Twisted whole history. They needed to study history before they make it up!!!!! Actors can't actually speak mongolian. All of them Chinese actors. Even don't look like Mongolian. This movie is insult to Mongolian nation. Chingis khan had great history, he never prisoned by chinese or his wife didn't join or slept with stranger to safe him.

    Real shame. They was no need to twist or make it up. History itself is very intriguing.

  • all 3 languages in one

    the actors and charecters speakeing mongol

    the host is talking russian

    and subtitile in english great epiccc

  • Comment removed

  • i need a new wallpaper!!!

  • no horse got hurt :D

  • as for horse archers - there is only 4% chance to make sufficient damage to lightly armored person by arrow and less than 1% to make any damage to heavily armored knight. Composite bow which used by altaic nomads is the most powerful but can be used only by infantry but not horsemen because it is very big and heavy - about 2 meters long. Nomadic horsemen used small bows which can be used only against poor equiped militia, light infantry and light cavalry but not against armored warriors.

  • @IlshatAh Well you made good point but you forgot all of Ghengis Khan's troops were horsemen and equips bow/sword/spear/shield which makes them very versatile fighters.While opposing empires where using specific troops like "Spearmen""Archers""Footman""C­avalry".Also they carry many kinds of arrows like armor piercing/sound making ..etc

  • The Mongols of Genghis Khan were a turkic tribe that lived in present day Mongolia. Gengiz khan means " Great Khan/Leader". His actual name "temujin" means iron-smith( temir in turkic is iron, jin is smith). Mongols was the name for the turkic peoples just as the word "tatar"( another turkic tribe that Temujin conquered). The large and unfortunate misconception is that the present day "mongolians" means descendants of Genghiz. They are called mongolians because they inhabit present day Mongolia.

  • @Regalya Wrong, as Mongols are Altaic but not Turkic. They have some simularities in language but not in genetics.

  • @ExtremeDeathman Didn't mean Mongols are solely Turkic i ment that Mongols asimilated under Turks

    Mongol empire = Turcomongol, 8 Turk 2 mongol ratio

    After cenghiz fall = 7 Turk 2 mongol nation built from it

  • @Regalya There are 3 Altaic descending groups: Turkic, Mongolic and Tungusic.

    Genghiz Khan had almost 150000 warriors under him as he conquered his empire.

    As he did not settle mostly, his troops weren't assimilated from the other cultures they conquered.

    In the empire there was a man to man ratio mongols to turks at about 3:4, as the rest of the imperial citizens were persians, indian, chinese, korean, magyar, slavs and romanian.

  • Comment removed

  • @ExtremeDeathman they have relations in genetics too. Haplogroups C, N, Q

    Also the same fundametals of culture, acient believs and traditions

  • @IlshatAh

    Turks at that time were muslim, Mongols believed in wind gods and nature elements.

    Haplogroups C, N, Q are not related to each other. Also The nomad fundamentals of nomadic cultures were the same over the world and the entire humanity. This doesn't count. Their traditions are also very different.

    And Russians at that time didn't exist. The russians you are talking about, were mongols...

  • @ExtremeDeathman anatolian turks are 95% conquered greeks. I told about original huns and turks. When they invaded Europe it was about 10-20 thousand brave eastern asians who managed to conquer very populated continent for several times. They raped european women and assimilated slaves. Nowadays turks and hungarians are almost pure europeans with rare asiatic features. Turks living in central asia are still asiatic although they assimilated local indo-europeans. watch?v=dpfjMt7FB-c

  • khan had the largest empire in the world......

  • @21drewscott And the most unstable ever. In fact, it's not even a real empire as the building of cities, the develpoment of infrastrucure, the deployment of stationary armies which could hold the lines of the provinces and states, the administration and such important things were all missed or only hardly done by Temudjin. Only Kublai and Ugedai really were Emperors.

  • Amazing if this came out as a game, and im not talking about Rome total war alike or Mount&Blade shit but this game in Call of Duty quality. Would be great!

  • everything youMETaZAON said is true! chingis khan was true mongolian and wasnt a murderer like some muslims thinking who are brainwashed by stupid religion like kid story. listen you fuckers that fuckin religion called myslim is just a joke. real killers are fuckin muslims! fuckya all sonna bitches! thousands of people dying in the world becuz of terrorism which muslims make. u hate chingis khan who lived in 13th century saying he killed people but how about yourselves? who making kill nowadays?

  • @eunene1

    Yeah, of course, Chingis khan was the most merciful man in the history!!! : P

    hhhhhhh

  • Comment removed

  • TURK turkish : kazakstan uzbekistan azeribejan kirgizstan turkmenistan tatarstan tuvan japan korean ALTAY : people

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @ironmantis25 Well that's why when mongols invaded japan their first attacks were so successful.Samurais are supreme fighters which i like really like ,but ...one thing.Those mongols fought all other asian troops ,egyptian mamelukes ,elephant riders from burma ,european knights etc etc ..While at that time japanese only fought among themselves except sometimes sails to korean beaches.It's just not comparable and Tsunami saves people sometimes but destroys sometimes.

  • So the Genghis Khan's Horsemen were suicidals uh? Pretty smart man.

  • Comment removed

  • The little I of know of Mongolian history seems almost supernatural. A small tribe from Central Asia becomes in one man's lifetime a super power, humbling ever army it ever met and their enemies weren't pushovers either. The Chinese kingdoms they conquered were bigger and better defended than anything in Europe at the time, And then like the Huns before them after holding a huge, well organized empire with everything from an efficient ;postal service to paper money they seem to just disappear .

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Turkish people are not mongol, but the turkish soldiers were the majority of the mongol army. Because in the past mongols and turkic tribles had the same religion is called tengrism and also language is quite similar. In turkish history we can find over hundred legends so dont need such a bloody leader.

  • Well, Genghis Khan was O.K but his sons where better, especially the one that led the GOLDEN HORDE, THE MUSLIM WARRIORS!! But the best was Khalid Ibn Walid, he DESTROYED the "MIGHTY ROMANS" and left them HUMILIATED. 40,000 vs an odd 250,000 and the Muslims still won, suck on that you little dickwads. We had the best empires and the best warriors, always out numbered and still won. And when Rome and Persia fought, Persia was NOT Muslim then, Muslims BEAT BOTH OF THEM SO BAD!

  • @edlgotbanged You mean he beat the Byzantines, a mere shadow of former Roman prowess. Last I checked, Genghis Khan conquered and massacred Muslim lands (Kwarizm Empire) for their insolence. He sought peace and trade with them and sultan beheaded the ambassador. One of the greatest mistakes in all of history wouldn't you say?

  • @theDyingWhale So what? We lost some who cares? LOL @ the Bazant's being a mere shadow of the former roman empire, you chat so much s***. It was led by Hercules one of the greatest leaders of Rome and they had 200,000+ soldiers and they got MERKED by 40,000 MAXIMUM. Yeah, I'd be pissed as-well. Oh and didn't the mongols turn Muslim? Oh how bad for you =) And Muslims did take some damage, but we gained momentum towards the end and you know it. =D So suck it.

  • @edlgotbanged Oh wow! Some Mongols turned Muslim, some turned Christian, some turned Buddhist, like the ones in Mongolia proper nowadays. How is that bad for me? I give a shit what religion people choose, especially when it happened centuries ago. And the Byzantines were more Greek than Roman. Heraclius (not Hercules, genius) made Greek the official language, practiced Christianity rather than the Roman religion, and was centered in Constantinople, not Rome. Now pipe down.

  • GHENGIS kHAN vs ATILA......WHO

  • @rolandoen smart-ass they were both MONGOLS, Attila was a HUN but HUNS came from mongolian tribes, in other words Huns were more like ancestors of the mongols.

  • @rolandoen

    Mongol= Mongol  G.khan

    Hun=Turkic mongol Attila Hun

    Ottomans=Turkic Fatih.Sultan Mehmet

  • @Polofreak6n2

    Hun = Kirgisian  Mongols , not turkic

    Ottoman = Seldjuk descendant

  • @rolandoen of course ATİLLA !

  • The inferior and anonymous masses of apelike homunculi from the East. Attila tried next, then the Turks. All failed. Glory to the house of Europe, cunts.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Mongols and Turks

    turanian

  • 5:01 the woman's voice made me realise that I'm proud to be an asian male!

    My east asian brothers and sisters, and the indigenous people of siberia!

    I die for what we are.... Let's never forget where we come from....

  • The Mongols were often outnumbered when they fought in Europe, Russia and Asia.

  • Those who step on the QURAN MAJEED like Genghith khan did to step up to his high mighty horse get Bad awaa of saa maa ria awaa lay o'kum of saallah

  • @wingully English motherfucker, do you speak it

  • not a brother of moghul's but cousin full of sin who could not learn to live in peace or saallah as the awaa lay o'come saa laam asuse of tear's of awaa of allah had taken his ship's to the ocean depth to drown in the pool of ocean of tear's of the mother's and father's who had lost there loved one's. he should not have stepped on the QURAN MAJEED to get on his horse.

  • @wingully Go back to your uncivilised country and then waste people's time with this islamic fairytale stories.. It's year 2011 here, not 300

  • BULLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Man,if you have 10000 warriors like those horseman you could conquer the world

  • @bobbymilankaka And they did,the world at that time,anyway.

  • @bobbymilankaka They almost did tho those Göktürks(40 horseman scene inspired from legend of kürshad)

  • @bobbymilankaka Genghis had about 20000 of them and he didn't conquer it...

  • @ExtremeDeathman because mongols didn't know how to build ships )

  • @IlshatAh

    Wrong.

    Because the mongol hit and run tactics (which the huns also used) didn't work in all the swamps, mountains and forests in eastern and western europe. And then the Mongols were stunned by the extemely fierce knights of hungary, the eastern empire of Germany and the polish. (The huns by the german-celtic-eastern europe army)

  • @ExtremeDeathman You are wrong. Mongols won european alliance at Battle of Legnica (check wiki) but then had to go back to the east, because great khan Ugedey died in China and generals had to take part in elections of new khan.

    Actually Huns and Turks (ethnically the same as mongols) successfully used the same tactics and managed to conquer a large part of Europe. Their problem was that they were too few in number to maintain the conquered population within their empire for a long time

  • @IlshatAh

    Yes they won this battle, and why? Because they had twice the numbers.

    Also this was no european alliance and if the battle had taken place 5 days later, the mongols would have been defeated. Khan Ugedai died a year after they left the eastern part of europe.

    To few in Number to keep the empire together? Are you Nuts? The reason the conquered the balcan states (and only them), was their numberless armies against struggling small kingdoms...

  • @ExtremeDeathman wrong!! in the battle turko-mongols had 2 tumen its about 20 000 men, europeans had about 25 000 men, which were totally(!) killed. Read books and check datas at least in wiki.Numberless? LOL! even today turko-mongolic population of eastern europe is about 10 mln (most of which assimilated europeans- watch?v=Lgi2EKQ69aA) in compare with 650 mln europeans. If they were numberless nowadays europeans should have semi-chinese faces but not 1-2% of asiatic genes in their blood.

  • @ExtremeDeathman for example russian population was 50 times (!) bigger than population of Tatars in Golden Horde

  • @bobbymilankaka he did

  • @bobbymilankaka umm well Khan had 100.000 but only conquered half of world nothing more.

  • @Tomoesong well, territory is not so important. He conquered about 3/4 of worlds population of that time.

  • This movie looks good but reminds me of 300. Not that historic. Where the hell is Subutai? Whats the russian name of this movie? Id like to see it.

  • @OmniOdyne

    i's called "the mongol"

  • LOl i wanna kill this uploader for removing my comments in caps. this fucking pussy bastard. I am in total disbelief that the uploader actually did that. fuck you motherfucking turdhead.

  • Короче, читать каменты уже уныло, вы все дураки. Русские драли вас всех и будут еще драть если надо. А потом про вас кино снимать. А теперь комментируйте, вот, у вас есть повод объединиться хоть раз в жизни.

  • hey you guys should check out Danger Dad and his song hello, his whole rap is about Genghis Khan /watch?v=q3jNQZb1Ftk its pretty sick

  • And to be honest, out of all the famous conquerors, Genghis Khan was got the be the most talented. However as a person, I like Alexander The Great the most. He was much more gentle (mind you he's not a complete angel) as compare to Genghis Khan, who was just simply brutal.

  • @hacksign000 hannibal barca was also the most talented commander he got rome from north italy it was not so easy at that time he conquered spain to reach them lol

  • Lol it's funny how the 2 main guys, Temujin and Jamuka are japanese and chinese XD

  • hey my friend DANGER DAD made a song Called Hello and its about Genghis Khan /watch?v=q3jNQZb1Ftk dont copy and paste this link and please dont watch it....YOU WONT DO IT..

  • @youMETaZOAN u mad bro? ; ]

  • @yahbud As a matter of fact, yes. Every time I see uneducated people write comments at me, it pisses me off, especially those fucks who think they can speak the language and be able to read ancient primary documents on Genghis Khan's history. Lol ya I mad bro, thanks for noticing!

  • @youMETaZOAN agreed. remember somehow west has to know Huns as a barbaric people,so this is the part of the stoy. but it was fine when romans, greeks killed every single villagers during invasion fo asia, europe and africa. this is the racist world. I cleary understand your point/.

  • @KanadaTurk Well my point is not what you think. All I commented was the mountain of inaccuracies this movie presents to the audience, who will eventually soak false information coming from this movie completely dry like handful of fucking rotten sponges. That was the only comment I made, about the bullshit nature of this film. Guess what, all actors can't even utter a single mongolian word without an accent. Jesus christ, and people call this a movie about mongols.

  • @KanadaTurk ...also to make things even worse, the director simply scooped up bunch of random turds off of china to do the acting because of the fucking low budget of the film. so we now have bunch of chinks acting as soldiers of the noble genghis khan for this fucking joke movie. fucking cheap russian jewsssssssssss. But this movie was a really good laugh, hearing their oh-so-horrible accents that cannot be even compared to that of a random american just crashing a course in mongolian language.

  • MAnAI ARD TUMEN AGUU TUUHTEI HUMUUS SHUU

  • he was muslim pathan who is this genghiz fake

  • @FedayTek what in the heaven's fuck are you talking about??? Like I said, Genghis Khan's primary tactic is not to lose any of his fighters wastefully. You don't even have the capacity or the means to speak for the Mongols and Turks since you simply cannot read or speak the language well enough to pursue this matter in a more academic direction. you sir, need to go pack your things and go to your local university library and educate yourself. I am done with these illiterate monkey historians...

  • @youMETaZOAN

    turks are faggots. the mongols i respect but turks have nothing to do with mongols.

  • @the0th they once lived in the same land, but them claiming that Genghis Khan is of Turkish descent is utter bullshit. glad you didn't fall into their trap. : ) the turkish people may relate themselves to mongols but they don't have any right to call Genghis Khan a "Turkish" ruler. if that is commonly the case, i have to do a facepalm whenever i deal with these negligent bastards whom I call them turks.

  • @youMETaZOAN Wasn't it Attila the Hun who was Turkish? Both forces knew how to kick butt and spill blood :)

  • @Standuble possibly, but the turks themselves have underwent so many intermingling of blood with other neighboring races in Eurasia. The turks who live in Turkey is a huge mix of European Roman and the back then Seljuk Turks who were the real Turkish nomads. It is hard to draw a fine line who were the Huns racially because they themselves got mixed with the Mongols and Turks. One thing is certain that there are the Mongols and the Turks, and Genghis Khan was no intermediate in between.

  • @youMETaZOAN Intermediate in between,is that like ,the center in the middle ?

  • @billy1212ist yah, meaning he wasn't half turkish half mongolian. from what the sources say and simply by logic, he wasn't a pure Turkish ruler.

  • @youMETaZOAN -Sources being? And if the 'blood' is so 'mixed' overall what is the difference?At this time in the development of 'man' homo-erectus,he,man,does what he does best,'He kills'.A warlike savage humanoid."A PURE TURK" ? Why would a people care ? To say "This Horrible Killer,is one of OURS."???Well,people do care,about Hero Killers,flags,boundries,skin color,and power,and coupled with using 1/10 of our brain,we will remain so, for another 5000 years.Imagine when man is one,and in space.

  • @Standuble Genghis Khan's only purpose as a ruler was to unify the Mongolic people and drive those who opposed out of Central Asia. He therefore killed and expelled Turks, who themselves went westward and eventually established a state in Turkey, though they got brainwashed miserably by Islam and lost their identity as proud Turks who once lived side by side with the Mongols. At this point they absolutely have NO RIGHT to call Genghis Khan theirs. It is too late for these Islam influenced Turks.

  • @youMETaZOAN evdently your just as ignorant.

  • @MrFreedomification evidently you're just as fucking lazy and retarded for not going into the literature to find facts and reliable primary sources.

  • @youMETaZOA0N YEP THATS WHY I HAVE A DOCTORATE IN THIS AREA OF HISTORY AND YOU OBVIOUSLY DO NOT SO NOW WHO IS THE IGNORANT, ALSO ARROGANT KNOW IT ALL, OR PRETENDS TO, YOU INGRATES MAKE ME SICK DO YOUR RESEARCH AND TRY READING ABOUT THE FUCKING SUBJECT MATTER BEFORE YOU DEIGHN TO OFFER ANY OPINION.

  • @MrFreedomification IF YOU HAVE TIME TO FUCKING BRAG ABOUT YOUR DOCTORATE, I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR YOUR FUCKING JUSTIFICATION AS TO WHY YOU MAKE YOUR CLAIM. I HAVE SAID THE RIGHT THING, AND THAT IS GENGHIS KHAN IS NOT OF TURKISH DESCENT. HOW IGNORANT CAN YOU GET IF YOU BELIEVE HE IS TURKISH. ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL WOW YOU MUST FAIL MISERABLY IF YOU THINK SO AFTER HAVING PURSUED YOUR DEGREE. I HAVE A DEGREE IN MUCH USEFUL FIELD DUMBASS. HISTORY, YOU CAN SELF EDUCATE YOURSELF ANYDAY BY READING

  • @MrFreedomification or if you are arguing about Genghis Khan's tactics, it logically doesn't make sense to send few to die like that...the opposing army would have just wiped them out with bows and arrows, you failtard. you simply fail at simple logic. Genghis Khan wasn't that stupid to do that, otherwise he wouldn't have been able to conquer most of Central Asia. go back to doing some logic games if you fail this bad. all i can do is facepalm at your sorry ass comments.

  • @MrFreedomification I would like to see your sources mentioning that Genghis khan made his troops fight like this LOL. thanks for making me laugh this hard. I am literally in tear drops because of the intensity of the laugh. this movie is stupid bullshit and was not accurate at all, and if you claim them to be, i wish your college department committee revoke your PhD that has been of no use but to spread and smear more bullshit across the internet. thanks for your hard work for nothing, dumbass

  • @youMETaZOAN he was actually baiting the enemy and feigning retreat but i doubt he used his best warrior for that...

  • jamukh was temujin's friend

  • i'm mongolian jamukh didn't say "my brother" he said "my friend

  • this is turks and mogols

  • @youMETaZOAN the enemy (often larger numbers) to eventual ambushes. The director did show this aspect, but failed in many other aspects. Mongol strengths were their mobility in battle, tactics in intimidating, and lightning speed. The 10, 100, 1000, 10000 squads were unheard of in military ingenuity as they can be broken off in pieces following squad leaders for specific roles or combined to form fronts. They simply did not stay still as this clip also showed to await a massive army.

  • @youMETaZOAN This film is exactly what it is, a film. There are many flaws, but there are some accuracies to the madness of the director. You are correct as Ghengis never used his best soldiers such as the "Keshig" in tactics where they will surely lose most, but the tactic shown here is a legitimate MONGOL "Feigned Retreat." While ALL the soldiers need not be his elites, the leader shown in this clip is a very seasoned veteran whose sole intention with his usual 100-men squads is to lure. CONT

  • Who wuz Genghis khan

  • @bigbooda011 Genghis Khan? He is no one. All he did was conquer an empire 1200 square miles shy of Britain's peak. But I do like the fact his successors and his soldiers banged the shit out of the women of lands they conquered. It is so beautiful to see mixed descedants of Mongols from China to Saudi Arabia to eastern Europe. It kind of gives me the satisfaction that people's female ancestors got banged by a chink. Oh my bad, were you joking? Sorry.

  • @bigbooda011 Genghis Khan was A great King his descentants are now in the west of Burma because after Chin emperor broken the went to southeast asia . His descentdants are now in west oF BURMA . If u see their culture knife you will suprise .

  • NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :@ This is man not mongol. This is man a TURKİSH...... This grand grand grand gradnfather Turkish? okeyyyy

  • @TheTurkishScream mother fucker genghis khaan real mongolian man genghis grandfather real mongolian ok stupid pig khaan not arab name khaan mongolian language means khaan= king genghis king ok stupid pig liers muslim killer mother fucker turkish ok genghis khaan not muslim arab people ok genghis khaan asian wellow face man ok not killer terorris muslim not newer ok pizdaanuuudaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa­aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

  • @TheTurkishScream Everyone trying to say like that. If Mongols are some of the Turks, then whole world was Turk.

    And whole world people descended from the Turkic monkeys/apes. OR

    some alien Turkic mothership arrived in our earth and then Turkic life created.

    Barack Obama is Turkic.

    OMG! I discovered the world history! LOL!

  • Come with me BROTHER

  • Russia never was Conqured? Mongols make russia their bitch!

  • @jasincl no.

  • bunch of barbaric rats, who destroyed 400 years collection of scientific books. Murderers of books and civilization.

  • @IranSepahbod

    and how!!

  • @IranSepahbod Quite the opposite. The Mongols were not like any other conquers. They are indeed evil. However, Temujin spare historians, artist, and other intellectual figures. The Mongolian Empire is the first unified nation that did not suffered religious conflicts despite the fact it had so many different religious group living together. Crimes were never a problem, as historians said (similar), "One merchant can travel one end of the Mongol to the other without the fear of thief or robbers."

  • @Normacly

    They were barbaric. No one could ever proof that they were humans.

    The only way the became little bit more human was because they came in contact with other civilizations, not because they loved them, or they cared about artists etc. The historical mongolian was a savage, and later through influence and contact with other civilizations,they became humans.

  • @IranSepahbod More importantly, the Chinese general Guo Kan was in charge of the siege. He was blood thirsty person. He would had killed the Christian inhabitants if Sorghaghtani had not personal intervene. Kan show no mercy unlike his Mongol counter-part who would spare several intellectual leaders. Also, as I mention earlier. Other civilizations never truly influence them. The Mongol Empire was and still is the only civilization that do not have religious conflicts.

  • @IranSepahbod

    Oh I'm sure you persians were such civilized humanitarians. You wiped out and burned cities like Tbilisi, Baku and Yerevan. Not to mention torturing iraqi POWs in the 80s. But its not hard to see who you learn this from. So shut up and stick to worshiping your Mullah. And don't think Iran is somekind of a significant player even if your Mullah told you so. And don't even dream of going against the jews. They control Russia and USA so they have enough boms turn Iran into a desert.

  • @BENNYSIEGEL90

    haha.. nice try. When did persians burn Tblisi,Baku, and Yerevan?

    By the way Baku is an Iranian city, and Armenian country that is blocked by turkey and Azerbayjan, survives because Iran has not blocked their borders, and the relations between Iran and Armenia are good, while our religion is not the same, we tolerate and respect each other.

    Secondly we never attacked Iraqis, you little rat, and according to UN Iraq attacked Iran. Dont protect american-western puppet saddam.

  • Comment removed

  • @Normacly

    The Mongol leader Hulegu (the grandson of Ghengis Khan) killed the last of the Abbasid Caliphs and ordered all the books and manuscripts from the House of Wisdom to be thrown into the River Tigris.

    It was said that the waters of the Tigris indeed ran black for six months with the ink of all the books flung into the river by the Mongolian invaders. 400 years collection of philosophers,scientists were destroyed by this sub-humans.

  • @IranSepahbod There are mystery about that detail. For all we know, it can be the Caliph who ordered the destruction of the books.Survivors? Problem is that the Mongols are killers. They leave no mercy for anyone who resist their will. It is highly unlikely that any civilians will be able to run out of Baghdad with hordes of Mongol riders around. Overrunning starve people on foot is easy on the back of a horse. The Mongols can spare men as loots are share among them.

  • @Normacly

    they also destroyed the library of Alamut.

    I dont know how many libraries these subhumans destroyed. Luckily some books like that of avicenna survived, But how many of these avicennas and their works did the humanity loose?

  • @IranSepahbod @IranSepahbod Typical Iranian

    Iranians call Mongols uncivilicised ..Later they go, find every COLOR EYED PESHTUN AFGAN videos to idolize them as "True Aryans "

    because Peshtuns are founder fathers of civilisation :))

    Very funny

    Stupid racists

    Alamut was not a library,not a culture center ,,it was a dirty terrorist pit of assasins and thanks Hulagu cleaned all that shit

    Hassan Sabbah is Usame's grandfather!!

    /meh..

  • @kelRapunzel

    racists? because mongols were savages in that time?

    lol aryan has nothing to do with colored eyes, these nazi theories are not scientific.

    , Ismaili control of the fortress was lost to the invading Mongols and its famous library holdings were destroyed when the castle’s library was condemned to be burned by ‘Ata-Malik Juwayni, a servant of the Mongol court.

    alamut was just a small example.

  • @IranSepahbod they assasinated people

    So Hassan Sabbah killed civilicised but Mongolians killed uncivilised?

    oh i m so much fed up with these stereotypes..

    go nuke everyone . .be a civilicised murderer ..

    use swords and get recorded as barbarians.eternally

    very nice hypocracy

    what happened to japanese libraries .in hiroshima ?

    .no one call USA barbarians..

    btw i see lots of iranians there under those videos,just sayin,

  • @kelRapunzel

    alamut were just an example. There were so many people, books, that were killed apart from these assassins which you condemn. Secondly in those times internal conflicts, and kings killing their opponents was normal. This is totally other case than barbaricly genociding nations and raping and killing all the babies of a town!

    this is not stereotypes, these are facts, mongols were genociders. Genocides happened and in this case mongols did it, in other case ottoman turks,nazi germans

  • @IranSepahbod

    So if you use dirty politic strategies like Roman Empire you will be remembered as civilisation ,or massacre Turks in Talkan ,Curcen 70 years killed and tortured people of central asia to convert them to İslam ,is not genocide ,thats why no one remembers Murdererers such as Haccac, Mervan because they defence themselves with good excuses like Jihaad..i m done with all that..

    its just unrespectful to beautiful nomadic cultures but when they are mass murdered, no one mentions ..

  • @kelRapunzel ottoman mass murderers ? even Jewish of that time escaped from Spanish inquisition moved to Ottomans to live safe and secure.

    first you need to me honest ..people from every religion ,nation lived together for centuries,when they were mass murdered in Europe and Middle east ..It was same with Khazars ..again Jews escaped from Byzantine moved there to save their lives

    anyway..i dont want to initiate another useless debete here ..esp with liars ..bye

  • @kelRapunzel

    yes hiroshima was a genocide also. Those who did it were filthy barbarians. All genocides and massacres should be remembered equally, and condemned equally!

  • who is the stupid person talking in some unknown language when the characters are speaking? If its supposed to be dubbing.. the guy sucks big time..

  • Comment removed

  • Ha ha ha, archer draws the bow by two fingers...very funny...i thought that only Hollywood shit never did take care about ''some little things''...when i see similar shit and imperfections in Russian movie i can say :bro You really didn't deserve Oscar (fuck the Oscar). Do more study on drawing the bow!

  • kickass movie about kickass general not like that piece of shit movie about gaylord Alexander lol

  • this makes me want to play empire total war....

  • Genial commander .......russians had nightmares when they heard his name.

  • @ViciousCritique this is all nonsense, that comes from Jewish Christian "historians" from Byzantium. Gengis Khan was WHITE, BLONDE CAUCASIAN. Khan in old Slavic means "Great one" -as general, when Knez was a civilian ruler. Tartaria was Scynthia and not some chinese territory. Chinese arrived in 19th century to MOGOLIA (in old Greek means "Great one" ) and Byzantiums renamed the territory into MonGOLia and jews into Magog and Gog. Russians WERE Mogols and not Mongols. "MOGOLIAN" WHITE MUMMIES

  • @ViciousCritique WERE FOUND DEEPLY IN CHINESE TERRITORY AS 1. RULERS OF CHINA. Even if western jewish historians deny the history of these Aryan rulers - truth always comes

  • Kublai Khan sent an emissary named Meng Chi to Java Kartanagara ask the king to bow under his control and injured his face by Kartanagara. Kublai Khan's army during the invasion of Java island to bring 20,000 troops and a thousand ships can be repelled from the island of Java and its troops killed as many as 3,000 people more.

    INDONESIA...MANTAP

  • They made it realistic.. We've been studying Asia history so we watched this part of movie in school and now i'm interested with the story..

  • you know the mongols drank horse blood and piss? i just love how ancient war is romanticized lol

  • i read they did i am european but am rather mongol than japanese.

  • Hahaha they couldn't colonized Japan. Mongols are weak compared to Japanese warriors.

  • @TheHokkaidoCyborg

    The mongols were insanely powerful, the reason why they didn't invade Japan is not because they were weak, but because a storm destroyed the Mongolian fleet that was assembled to invade Japan.

  • @Kra7as Yeah and another storm destroyed them when they tried invading for a second time. Bad luck.

  • CONQUERED THE WORLD... WITH ONLY BOWS AND ARROWS... WHAT A GREAT NATION!

  • @jimusho1 BE PROUD TO BE A DESCENDANT OF GENGHIS KHAN!!!

  • What the heck? The Mongols disliked close-quarters combat and avoided it whenever possible. But I guess that doesn't make for a very interesting movie, ah well...

  • класны филим!

  • funny, it stopped when jamuka shouted attack and pointed his sword at me