I think eventually it will be fitted with Harpoon anti ship missiles & maybe cruise missiles..but it's early days yet, it's a new ship & it takes time & money to bring a ship up to spec..lets hope it gets the weapons it deserves.
Ugly ship.......And how can a mere Destroyer be the most expensive military ship the UK has built to date ? No Battleships ? Aircraft Carriers ? Nothing ?
@NikKast1981 probably because it is the latest ship we have built ,warship inflation increases at a massive amount more then civil inflation,plus its a very capble ship in term of air defence.it is at least four time more effective then the ship it replaces hence the cost.
@ROOSTER1067 A destroyer who needs sea to sea and sea to land support is simply silly......And it's also VERY expensive....Destroyers were always ment to support large fleets of carriers, battleships and transports but this can hardly support itself as is......Would it hurt if they made it a bit larger in order to outfit it with more weapons ?
@NikKast1981 It's a much cleaner design with no right angles unlike other designs wich look cluttered & messy with their antennas, it's designed to be stealthy & hard to detect, it's the future
@NikKast1981 it's you that aint makin any sense..what's your point?? Ive already explained below why it looks like that & I like it, much sleeker than older designs..
@TyphoonDelta1 Beautiful does not equal to sleek.......You can something beautiful/pretty because of it's design....This ship has no design...You can call the Battleship Yamato beautiful since it had a great design, this no.....You can't call 500 pieces of metal placed next to each other as something great in design.
@ROOSTER1067 Yeah ,she was built across the street from me at BAE syst. in Govan on the Clyde.Ive watched all the T45's being built from the ground up...Its amazing to see them out at sea doing they're thing when you remember them when the were just big bits of raw steel.
@williamblair11 i bet so,just such a shame there were only six built instead of the 12 planed .they supposed to a awsome bit off kit with massive capabilities
@ROOSTER1067 Hopefully by 2015 when there is the next defense review we will have more spending in the military therefore we can afford more of these destroyers.
i love brits tech.
robert1970able 1 month ago
@robert1970able it looks good
ROOSTER1067 1 month ago
I think eventually it will be fitted with Harpoon anti ship missiles & maybe cruise missiles..but it's early days yet, it's a new ship & it takes time & money to bring a ship up to spec..lets hope it gets the weapons it deserves.
TyphoonDelta1 2 months ago
Ugly ship.......And how can a mere Destroyer be the most expensive military ship the UK has built to date ? No Battleships ? Aircraft Carriers ? Nothing ?
NikKast1981 4 months ago
@NikKast1981 probably because it is the latest ship we have built ,warship inflation increases at a massive amount more then civil inflation,plus its a very capble ship in term of air defence.it is at least four time more effective then the ship it replaces hence the cost.
ROOSTER1067 4 months ago
@ROOSTER1067 A destroyer who needs sea to sea and sea to land support is simply silly......And it's also VERY expensive....Destroyers were always ment to support large fleets of carriers, battleships and transports but this can hardly support itself as is......Would it hurt if they made it a bit larger in order to outfit it with more weapons ?
NikKast1981 4 months ago
@NikKast1981 it could take more weapons but that would add to the cost.most of the budget was wasted on devoloping these ships
ROOSTER1067 4 months ago
@ROOSTER1067 If i was them i would never develop an destroyer with these armaments....
NikKast1981 4 months ago
@NikKast1981 it is a very capble air warfair destroyer just to expensive and under armed
ROOSTER1067 4 months ago
@ROOSTER1067 It should be called a anti-air support vessel or something, not a destroyer....
NikKast1981 4 months ago
@NikKast1981 perhaps since it has little in the way of offencive weapons
ROOSTER1067 4 months ago
@NikKast1981 This ship is beautiful..u dont know what your talkin about !!
TyphoonDelta1 2 months ago
@TyphoonDelta1 It's made by straight pieces of metal, what's so pretty about that ?
NikKast1981 2 months ago
Comment removed
TyphoonDelta1 2 months ago
@NikKast1981 It's a much cleaner design with no right angles unlike other designs wich look cluttered & messy with their antennas, it's designed to be stealthy & hard to detect, it's the future
TyphoonDelta1 2 months ago
@TyphoonDelta1 One moment you say it's pretty and then next you just say it's the future. Totally different things.
NikKast1981 2 months ago
@NikKast1981 it's you that aint makin any sense..what's your point?? Ive already explained below why it looks like that & I like it, much sleeker than older designs..
TyphoonDelta1 2 months ago
@TyphoonDelta1 Beautiful does not equal to sleek.......You can something beautiful/pretty because of it's design....This ship has no design...You can call the Battleship Yamato beautiful since it had a great design, this no.....You can't call 500 pieces of metal placed next to each other as something great in design.
NikKast1981 2 months ago
@NikKast1981 Whatever...
TyphoonDelta1 2 months ago
Beautiful,dangerous,patriotic.......Built in Scotland - From Girders (literally).
williamblair11 5 months ago
@williamblair11 i did not know she was built in scotland but i do now chears
ROOSTER1067 5 months ago
@ROOSTER1067 Yeah ,she was built across the street from me at BAE syst. in Govan on the Clyde.Ive watched all the T45's being built from the ground up...Its amazing to see them out at sea doing they're thing when you remember them when the were just big bits of raw steel.
williamblair11 5 months ago
@williamblair11 i bet so,just such a shame there were only six built instead of the 12 planed .they supposed to a awsome bit off kit with massive capabilities
ROOSTER1067 5 months ago
@ROOSTER1067 Hopefully by 2015 when there is the next defense review we will have more spending in the military therefore we can afford more of these destroyers.
FordyFilms 4 months ago
@FordyFilms hopefully so
ROOSTER1067 4 months ago