Clearly, ferrisbueller9000 thinks he understands something about astrophysics, but does not. I think he is possibly sincere, but stopped paying enough attention in the early 80s. That's the thing about science. It remains in motion. We keep discovering more. You either hang on an continue your studies, or you let go and join the "I miss Pluto" crowd and get laughed at by the younger folks who can still hang on. I'm 47, still doing my finger exercises daily. Stellar nurseries are well accepted.
If this guy knew what the fuck he was talking about, nature would be surprising him continuously, "beyond our imagination". He as much as says he never knows what to expect, to me that speaks to his colossal ignorance.
The narrator also claims that a star is observed in this region that is "about to go supernova". Astronogers don't understand the cause of supernovae, so they have no frame of reference from which to attain predictability. That's why they're always "surprised" and "baffled" by what they see in space when it disagrees with what they were taught by other astronogers. They remain unperturbed, though. Apparently you have to be patently stupid to get through an astronomy course in a university.
The narrator also claims observations are "deceiving astronomers". What's more accurate to say is that astronogers have deceived themselves, one another and everyone else. They claim their models indicate masses for stars beyond theoretical limits, so what do they do? They ignore observable reality and cling desperately to their theory, imagining and convincing themselves that they can't believe what they see, only what they were taught. It's ridiculous and would be funny if it weren't tragic.
This idea that supernovae "seed space with the heavy elements necessary for planet formation" is idiotic in the extreme. Astronogers' models of planetary formation are cartoonish and ignore known physics. The further claim that supernovae may "trigger new star formation" is also ludicrous on its face. Also quite stupid is the claim that these events "carve out" areas of "gas". This video is more error than fact, despite the quality of the images, the commentary is ignorant and misleading.
The claim is made that astronogers have observed stars whose "masses differ" but whose "ages are similar". Astronogers don't have a method for determining the age of stars that isn't based on erroneous assumptions and outlandish attempts at imaginary physics. Further, astronogers know nothing about the "life cycles of stars", which are electrically driven, not driven by self-compressing gas initiating fusion. What a bunch of clowns.
These nebulae are not "gas", this is not a "cloud" surrounded by "gas", space is filled with plasma. Virtually everything we see in space is plasma, not "gas". Every time this astronnoger uses the word "gas" he proves what an ignoramus he is, he doesn't even understand one of the fundamental aspects of the cosmos, that is it well over 99% plasma.
if energy can't be created, then how can a cloud of gas become a star that kicks out tons of energy for billions of years blow up and leave a gas cloud for a new star?
@Revstoningpot Energy can not be created nor destroyed. I don't think you quite grasp what "energy" is too well. The energy is there; it's just in a different form.
Clouds of gas don't become stars. Stars are formed in "z pinches" along electric currents in space, they are lit electrically, not by "collapsing gas". Gases don't self-compress under their own weight, that flies in the face of elementary chemistry.
Matter (like gas) cane be converted into energy.. Energy is equal to mass * C(speed of light)^2, which basically means that a small amount of matter converts into a shitton of energy..
@rehzon And how do you think that the black holes that swallow all the galaxy itself, can create the thing it is swallowing? What if we were looking at it backward?
@ferrisbueller9000 Because black holes have a limit to grow up, and then they explode in a mini-big-bang version. After that, gravity will form a new rotating black hole, which will make everything else to rotate around it. forming new stars and solar systems in the process. Eventually, intelligent life.
a black hole (which apparently does exist) pulls on everything in its nearby area. And a Super-massive Black Hole pulls on an entire galaxy - which happens in an active galaxy btw.
Therefore whatch this documentation to gain more wisdome :P
BBC Horizon Super-massive Black Holes
have fun and stfu if you cant be sure that what u say might not be the only truth... or more likely outdated.
his voice -.-' desturbing
cocamyass 1 week ago
i cant focus on anything else but his shirt...
mrsun513 4 months ago
Im actually doing a science project so this is now being called procrastination
Thetrini11 9 months ago 2
1 person crashed it's ship into a nebula.
skari121 9 months ago
Clearly, ferrisbueller9000 thinks he understands something about astrophysics, but does not. I think he is possibly sincere, but stopped paying enough attention in the early 80s. That's the thing about science. It remains in motion. We keep discovering more. You either hang on an continue your studies, or you let go and join the "I miss Pluto" crowd and get laughed at by the younger folks who can still hang on. I'm 47, still doing my finger exercises daily. Stellar nurseries are well accepted.
sbergman27 1 year ago
unfortunate choice of name - hubblecast sounds kinda like holocaust :P
Zirc0nium69 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If this guy knew what the fuck he was talking about, nature would be surprising him continuously, "beyond our imagination". He as much as says he never knows what to expect, to me that speaks to his colossal ignorance.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The narrator also claims that a star is observed in this region that is "about to go supernova". Astronogers don't understand the cause of supernovae, so they have no frame of reference from which to attain predictability. That's why they're always "surprised" and "baffled" by what they see in space when it disagrees with what they were taught by other astronogers. They remain unperturbed, though. Apparently you have to be patently stupid to get through an astronomy course in a university.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The narrator also claims observations are "deceiving astronomers". What's more accurate to say is that astronogers have deceived themselves, one another and everyone else. They claim their models indicate masses for stars beyond theoretical limits, so what do they do? They ignore observable reality and cling desperately to their theory, imagining and convincing themselves that they can't believe what they see, only what they were taught. It's ridiculous and would be funny if it weren't tragic.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This idea that supernovae "seed space with the heavy elements necessary for planet formation" is idiotic in the extreme. Astronogers' models of planetary formation are cartoonish and ignore known physics. The further claim that supernovae may "trigger new star formation" is also ludicrous on its face. Also quite stupid is the claim that these events "carve out" areas of "gas". This video is more error than fact, despite the quality of the images, the commentary is ignorant and misleading.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The claim is made that astronogers have observed stars whose "masses differ" but whose "ages are similar". Astronogers don't have a method for determining the age of stars that isn't based on erroneous assumptions and outlandish attempts at imaginary physics. Further, astronogers know nothing about the "life cycles of stars", which are electrically driven, not driven by self-compressing gas initiating fusion. What a bunch of clowns.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These nebulae are not "gas", this is not a "cloud" surrounded by "gas", space is filled with plasma. Virtually everything we see in space is plasma, not "gas". Every time this astronnoger uses the word "gas" he proves what an ignoramus he is, he doesn't even understand one of the fundamental aspects of the cosmos, that is it well over 99% plasma.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
if energy can't be created, then how can a cloud of gas become a star that kicks out tons of energy for billions of years blow up and leave a gas cloud for a new star?
Revstoningpot 1 year ago
@Revstoningpot Energy can not be created nor destroyed. I don't think you quite grasp what "energy" is too well. The energy is there; it's just in a different form.
Psychonaut2021 1 year ago
@Psychonaut2021 well that may be so but i don't think anybody does
Revstoningpot 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Revstoningpot
Clouds of gas don't become stars. Stars are formed in "z pinches" along electric currents in space, they are lit electrically, not by "collapsing gas". Gases don't self-compress under their own weight, that flies in the face of elementary chemistry.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
@Revstoningpot
Matter (like gas) cane be converted into energy.. Energy is equal to mass * C(speed of light)^2, which basically means that a small amount of matter converts into a shitton of energy..
JesterAzazel 1 year ago
Gas doesn't collapse or clump it expands.
rehzon 1 year ago
@rehzon Go back to 4th grade and learn about gravity!
Object draw other object to each-other. the more gravity from the gathering of lighter forms of matter will then create more dense forms of matter.
This Rehzon is common sense... It does not take a genus to understand how gas collects together to create stars and planets..
Darkphoenix3450 1 year ago
But I thought the Earth was only 6000 years old!!
Rndlle 1 year ago
@Rndlle are you kidding me, it's billions of years old
BENL993 1 year ago
Huh, I thought stars were made on Earth by rolling stuff up into a katamari.
drokles 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Star birth is a myth, star formation has never been observed,
star dies it has been observed, stars has always existed.
ferrisbueller9000 2 years ago
Protostars have been observed, and they are the birthing of main sequence stars.
volhen 2 years ago
Well, saying that these stars are young does not make it true
ferrisbueller9000 2 years ago
@ferrisbueller9000
Yeah. There aren't new stars forming in clouds, just the gravity effecting
the cloud movement in front of the stars, giving the perception of
star formation.
rehzon 1 year ago
@rehzon And how do you think that the black holes that swallow all the galaxy itself, can create the thing it is swallowing? What if we were looking at it backward?
ferrisbueller9000 1 year ago
@ferrisbueller9000 Because black holes have a limit to grow up, and then they explode in a mini-big-bang version. After that, gravity will form a new rotating black hole, which will make everything else to rotate around it. forming new stars and solar systems in the process. Eventually, intelligent life.
hectorlover123 1 year ago
@ferrisbueller9000
If a black hole exists, I don't think they create anything. If one
sucked matter through one end and spit it out the other,
the matter had to be there already.
rehzon 1 year ago
@rehzon So basically you have absolutely no clue why galaxies exist... nice!
ferrisbueller9000 1 year ago 2
@ferrisbueller9000
A black hole if it (exists) pulls on the energy of a star (if that's what's happening)
and not an entire galaxy.
rehzon 1 year ago
@rehzon
Dear Sir,
a black hole (which apparently does exist) pulls on everything in its nearby area. And a Super-massive Black Hole pulls on an entire galaxy - which happens in an active galaxy btw.
Therefore whatch this documentation to gain more wisdome :P
BBC Horizon Super-massive Black Holes
have fun and stfu if you cant be sure that what u say might not be the only truth... or more likely outdated.
unbeingdeadisntalive 11 months ago
@unbeingdeadisntalive
All I got was more theories and special effects from those videos. I think close
stars rotating fast don't need a black hole to do so. Black holes are just about
invisible, effect matter around them, x-rays are given off in the area..what
a coincidence..So do Brown Dwarfs! You can have you "stfu" back.
rehzon 11 months ago
@rehzon Dude, you might wanna look like you know best, BUT NOBODY KNOWS.
Please stop being a little smart ass, how old are you?
ferrisbueller9000 1 year ago
@volhen theoretical.
ferrisbueller9000 1 year ago
then throw to a trash the whole theory of the origin of the universe
hectorlover123 2 years ago
Or just keep doubdting it since we are blocked within our restricted perception of the time and space
ferrisbueller9000 2 years ago
I have not doubt, I am being sarcastic
hectorlover123 2 years ago
@hectorlover123 Well having no doubt about something you don't know is most refer as religion or that kind of stuff!
ferrisbueller9000 1 year ago
@ferrisbueller9000 Well, then science is corrupt and not worthtrusty for you.
hectorlover123 1 year ago
@hectorlover123 and all of this is theory of coarse.
ferrisbueller9000 1 year ago