HAILMASTERSATAN: You know, you are really only exposing yourself as a puerile (look it up) juvenile who didn't get enough attention from his daddy (if he knew who his daddy was). Why don't you go away until you grow up?
Hey u know something u former pedophile dont talk shit because u are one disgusting Jabba the Hut.U like to bully lil innocent people then u mke comments like your some Innocent old man.U are one fat motherfucker so go fuck yourself and get rid of your triple chins u fat fuck!
Very good video my friend. Here is a question I have about the genealogy. Why would there even be a need to go through Joseph? Joseph was not Jesus' natural father. i.e., Jesus did not have Joseph's blood. Therefore Joseph's bloodlines really could not be used to establish Jesus' line to David. Hope you understand what I mean. Any thoughts?
I understand what you mean, and I have long wondered that myself. It seems that in their attempt to show that Jesus fulfilled the prophecy that the Messiah would be of the House of David, the Gospel writers had something of a mental lapse!
There is a more serious problem. Both geneologies trace Jesus ' ancestry through the Accursed Branch of the houses of Coniah and Jehoiachim, both of whom "did that which is evil in the sight of God". The seed of these evildoers was barred forever from sitting on the throne of David. The Jews expected that their messiah would sit on the throne of David. Nowhere does the New Testament show Jesus attempting to explain to the Jews why he should be nevertheless be regarded as their messiah.
I think you are right. The numbers game he used with the 14 generation gap, AND my firstborn reasoning were both wrong. However, npage85's claim that Luke's genealogy said it was from David to Joseph, but was "really" from David to Mary is just a speculation on his part that doesn't work. He claims "extra-biblical" support, without citing it specifically by name, but that, too is suspect. And I would take it as equal to the spurious interpolations of Eusebius into the Jesus accounts by Joesphus.
I agree. If he has extra-biblical support, we need to know what it is. In all the times I've seen this claim made, I don't think I've ever seen the support actually cited.
My apologies to you, GalacticAtom, for the conflict on your video between me and HAILMASTERSATAN. After this I will just leave the little prick to have his say and not answer him further.
HAILMASTERSATAN: You know, you are really only exposing yourself as a puerile (look it up) juvenile who didn't get enough attention from his daddy (if he knew who his daddy was). Why don't you go away until you grow up?
Largo64 4 years ago
Hey u know something u former pedophile dont talk shit because u are one disgusting Jabba the Hut.U like to bully lil innocent people then u mke comments like your some Innocent old man.U are one fat motherfucker so go fuck yourself and get rid of your triple chins u fat fuck!
XDemoniumX 4 years ago
Very good video my friend. Here is a question I have about the genealogy. Why would there even be a need to go through Joseph? Joseph was not Jesus' natural father. i.e., Jesus did not have Joseph's blood. Therefore Joseph's bloodlines really could not be used to establish Jesus' line to David. Hope you understand what I mean. Any thoughts?
JoesRambles 4 years ago
I understand what you mean, and I have long wondered that myself. It seems that in their attempt to show that Jesus fulfilled the prophecy that the Messiah would be of the House of David, the Gospel writers had something of a mental lapse!
GalacticAtom 4 years ago
That's a possibility. It just struck me as odd that they would try and trace Jesus' line through David.
JoesRambles 4 years ago
There is a more serious problem. Both geneologies trace Jesus ' ancestry through the Accursed Branch of the houses of Coniah and Jehoiachim, both of whom "did that which is evil in the sight of God". The seed of these evildoers was barred forever from sitting on the throne of David. The Jews expected that their messiah would sit on the throne of David. Nowhere does the New Testament show Jesus attempting to explain to the Jews why he should be nevertheless be regarded as their messiah.
pirbird14 3 years ago
I think you are right. The numbers game he used with the 14 generation gap, AND my firstborn reasoning were both wrong. However, npage85's claim that Luke's genealogy said it was from David to Joseph, but was "really" from David to Mary is just a speculation on his part that doesn't work. He claims "extra-biblical" support, without citing it specifically by name, but that, too is suspect. And I would take it as equal to the spurious interpolations of Eusebius into the Jesus accounts by Joesphus.
Largo64 4 years ago
I agree. If he has extra-biblical support, we need to know what it is. In all the times I've seen this claim made, I don't think I've ever seen the support actually cited.
GalacticAtom 4 years ago
My apologies to you, GalacticAtom, for the conflict on your video between me and HAILMASTERSATAN. After this I will just leave the little prick to have his say and not answer him further.
Largo64 4 years ago
I might like what you had to say much more if you were to get a microphone a little closer to you. On ocassion a word s lost. Thanks
ktorch 4 years ago
Sorry about that. I normally do have the microphone closer, but forgot about it this time!
GalacticAtom 4 years ago