{LMAO - White Egypt? White Africa? LMFAO!! Keep dreaming. I feel sorry for white folk actually! Because they have been lied to and almost extinct hahaahha}
Caucasians Outnumber Blacks on planet earth nearly five to one genius.
Quit smoking so much chronic and throw your crack pipe away .
Caucasians have recessive genes and aren't able to produce offspring. Whites are 8% of world population blacks outnumber and hispanics in world population we are second in population to the chinese. LOL were did you get this 5 to 1 statistic when europeans and hispanics put together can't outnumber blacks in world poulation. As far as black egypt I can name one who demolished europeans Cheikh Anta Diop. He debated with the best of your idiot scholars who had no facts in there arguments only lies
The only reason North Africa is Arab is because of conquest. Just like North America natives were slaughtered to make way for savage racist murderers. Im not sure what they were, but the Egyptians were definately not fucking white! They were either black, arab or a mix between the two.
The Mummies and DNA say they were North African Caucasoid. Egypt recorded some of the hottest temperatures on earth you europeans couldnt survive in extremely hot temperatures. Let me ask you this question. Did europeans leave all that ice in europe go to africa build a superior civilization such as Egypt or Khemet and leave the civilization go back to europe and have nothing thats resembles a pyramid a oblice or anything from the civilization you built. I can name many other kingdoms in africa
Dude, I don't know what the hell you're smoking, but mummies and DNA don't lie. Do you even know what caucasoid means?
Your ignorance is incredible. Egyptians were and still are a mediterranean people. Who the hell claims Euros left the ice to come to Egypt?? And then Euros can't live in hot climates?? Whites have traveled and colonized every corner of this planet.
Get off the dope and take your Afrocentric spamming elsewhere.
"You Afrocentrics are truly nutcases. That's why nobody takes your views seriously. I don't see anyone here claiming it a Euro civilization, but a mediterranean civilization."
Its because they only see black and white. They have no understanding of the world as most of them have never been outside the US. They dont get that Africa has always has lighter colored people in the north, and the difference between North and South Egypt. They are just spoon fed by 5 books and recycle the content.
LMAO - White Egypt? White Africa? LMFAO!! Keep dreaming. I feel sorry for white folk actually! Because they have been lied to and almost extinct hahaahha
Anyway, don't believe anything anyone says here, unless it comes from a real egyptologist/ archaeologist like me;) These people here abuse Ancient Egypt only to vent their inferior, racist views. Tomorrow, my mailbox will be full again with reactions from racists of all colour that I should read more about Egypt blabla, haha! And yours will be too! And you'll feel the urge to react, although the discussion leads to nothing. Welcome to the club, ItalianoAmericano!;)
There were scholars who tried to claim that great Zimbabwia wasn't created by blacks though the sight shows indiginous African insignia. In the same professinal formal mannor , they claimed it (Grt Zmbw) to be the product of Solomon, and other cultures. Anything but the obvious black that lived in the area. And with Kemit it's the same thing. Blacks still live in the Southern area and are muted out as though they aint there. Stay on Ytbe and see Who's Stealing History pt1.
If you would have read more of my reactions, also on Afrocentric vids, you should know I am wondering the same as you do. I reacted on a comment given by Theplaintruth, which he removed. Guys like him and Painoftruth are actually doing the same as all these Afrocentrics,only they have this Eurocentric point of view. I agree with you. Afrocentrics and Eurocentrics are all f*#king racists!
It is true that the Ancient Egyptians were mixed: blacks, semites etc. together. No Egyptian museum in the world would buy your story that the Ancient Egyptians were plain white! Accept the fact that Egypt was an African culture, dude!
The orange hair you showed on the mural can be a headdress. The red hair on mummies can be henna or a loss of pigment in the hair due to the chemical reaction in the mummification process. And so on...Read more on Egypt if you want to claim something!
white people in ancient egypt LOLOLOLOL anything white in Kemet was long after the great dynastys starting with alexander,the ptolomeys etc people just cant believe blacks could have done anything in AFRICA why dont you go to other countries like china and say you built the great wall too . thats why all the noses are defaced that show african features but it still doesnt hide who they are look at the shinx from the side we are hip to your usurping and its petiful white man lies,, sad
aight this is the most bullshittities video ever; excuse my language ppl, iam not trying to put anybody down no races at all iam not some black panther fool or some 9 year old kid talking out of his ass, iam am a college student but iam not no honor student so yeah, i got a scholarship to play ball at San Diego State Unv. so I think iam pretty smart so yeah back to the subject
CAIRO -- Egyptian antiquities supremo Zahi Hawass insisted Tuesday that Tutankhamun was not black despite calls by US black activists to recognize the boy king's dark skin color.
"Tutankhamun was not black, and the portrayal of ancient Egyptian civilization as black has no element of truth to it," Hawass told reporters.
Yes, but can you say he is white then????Have you ever seen more intervieuws with Uncle Zahi?The things he said, omg, put other egyptologists in shame! Let's start with watching less Discovery and Nat.Geographic, will ye, and READ more!
Hawass is a liar - ask any of the Egyptians - if he told the truth about Egypt - he would lose billions - I am sorry but I am no longer fazed by your lies!
Egypt is in Africa - many Egyptians regard themselves as Africa - your euro clown mind tricks are crumbling away! Your illusions of fake granduer is falling. Must be hard to swallow the truth after being elevated for so long.
Hawass is a liar, but you know it all. What a relief!
Egypt is on the African continent. Very good. Russia is in Asia. I guess that makes those Russians Chinese or Indian? Nice logic.
I never claimed that Egyptians were White (though there were some). Maybe you should look at the racial makeup of Northern Africa a little more. They are Caucasoid for the most part.
Of the language spoken by the copper-tone-woolly-hair [Indians] Moors in the West-Indies/Americas for the speaking of the Hebrew/Chaldean/Arabic in the 1490's-C. E. For the referencing by the Cristobal Colon [Christopher: Columbus] for the sending of the interpreters before the King of the Cuba for the speaking of the Hebrew/Chaldean/Arabic for the referencing on the November: 2, in the Columbus-Diaries
Do you believe in what Herodotus, Aristotle, Diodorus, Champollion, Count de Volney, Tacitus, and Flavius Josephus say?When they say the Ancient Egyptians were black like all native born Africans, like all black Africans with Afro hair. Do you believe them? The truth.. but these people's only believe what they wanna believe.. it does not matter how many proof you show them fok these white & arab thefes
Do you believe in what Herodotus, Aristotle, Diodorus, Champollion, Count de Volney, Tacitus, and Flavius Josephus say?When they say the Ancient Egyptians were black like all native born Africans, like all black Africans with Afro hair. Do you believe them?
æl-myrca, an; m. All sallow, a black man, an Ethiopian; omnino fuscus, Æthiops :-- On ælmyrcan éðel-ríce in the realm of the Ethiopian, Andr. Kmbl. 863; An. 432.
AMORICA -AMERICA- ÆL-MYRCA
AMORICA was all territories of ancient British Isles and iberia - BLACKS -MOORS
I do not need speak about America we all know the History of the Moors in Terra Nova-(AMERICA)
Do you believe in what Herodotus, Aristotle, Diodorus, Champollion, Count de Volney, Tacitus, and Flavius Josephus say?When they say the Ancient Egyptians were black like all native born Africans, like all black Africans with Afro hair. Do you believe them?
æl-myrca, an; m. All sallow, a black man, an Ethiopian; omnino fuscus, Æthiops :-- On ælmyrcan éðel-ríce in the realm of the Ethiopian, Andr. Kmbl. 863; An. 432.
AMORICA -AMERICA- ÆL-MYRCA
AMORICA was all territories of ancient British Isles and iberia - BLACKS -MOORS
I do not need speak about America we all know the History of the Moors in Terra Nova-(AMERICA)
"The two main genetic clusters found in Egypt are Haplogroups E (E-M35, E-M78 and E-M81) and J-M267. The E clusters all originated within Sub-Saharan East Africa or Central Africa. E-M81 derived from the ancestral East African E-M35 lineage that spread to North Africa along with E-M78 during the early Holocene. J-M267 is derived from the Arab invasion" ,Am J. Hum. Genet. 74 (5): 101422.
The Holocene is a geological epoch which began approximately 10,000 years ago (about 8000 BC).
This means the central and sub-sahran people populated north and west Africa 10,000 years ago, and this also means no Khazar-caucasian or Arabs or some fake class caucasians called Berbers.
JM267 is due to the arab invasion 1,400 years ago, thus did not have anything to do with the building of Ancient Egypt.
It's just another video among so many others.Others will show you different things as well.
I was watching a documentary about AE,not that long ago, as most of the pharaohs on the doc were represented with full lips they explained this fact by the... painting style !
If i paint scandinavians in blond then it just due to the painting style !!!
Are you blind? Or stupid? Because only a fool would think these famous mummies are negroid. But, like you said, they pretend they aren't negro to keep the tourism up. LOL! You idiots are a laughing stock! What next? Cleopatra wasblack too? Smoke another one.
Cleopatra whas off greek decent.. the ancient egyptians where black.. why do you as a white boy care.. you whites claim greek & roman achievement while you where from west europa stupid
You've cleaned your act up and unlike some cowardly ignorant individuals like Sagitario, you allow people to answer. your racist attacks.
What make you think AE are linked to north-africans ? I grew up with north-aAricans and none of them makes such a claim.They aboslutely don't link themselves with AE.
"All one has to do is look at sub-saharan Africa and see all that advanced knowledge... [/sarcasm]"
So, seeing the current pityful state of South-america, according to your bright analysis(sarcasm) They never had a great civilisation: Inca, maya, Aztec.
And you've never been to Africa, anyway.
North-africans would laught at you if you told them they're descendants of AE.
If the current arabo-egyptians are descendants of Ancient-egyptians, then how come there's no trace of it in North-african countries or in the arab world ?
I draw a pyramid to an old berber once, it was just like mystery to him.
sweetheart stop spreading lies. I CANT WAIT TO PUT MY ACCOUNT UP. To all the black people, EGYPT WAS AND WILL ALWAYS BE BLACK. Its in AFRICA, why are you listening to white people? YOU KNOW THEY ARE LIARS AND RACISTS. egypt began around 3000 B.C.E. IT WAS RULED BY BLACK KINGS. Stop tainted our culture. and if you want to know more I WILL TELL YOU, I AM A COLLEGE HONOR STUDENT, AND I KNOW IM SMARTER THAN YOU. lol
And Russia is in Asia. Does that make Russians Chinese? Your logic is hilarious! Most North Africans look Caucasian because they are Mediterranean.
Another racist... let's see, Whites are liars and racists, and you're going to tell me about history? The reason you're so upset is that this video doesn't show blacks as ancient Egyptians. Because most of them are not.
Get your black racist buddies to "TELL" every Egyptian museum in the world to demand your views. Good luck, and good bye.
good remark paulblank85- you show good understanding of nigger knowledge, nigger logic and nigger reasoning skills. by the way- GOD is white. you niggers ought to keep this in mind when you are committing all the crimes you engage in
"black Irish" are black, Turks from Turky are indeed a Bird-Human crossbreed and Hungarians are in need of a meal"
If you had a source to back that up and not Mickey Mouse then I would listen to you but in this case Im NOT because Your logic can only be explained by you being DRUNK as usual the fact is
Yeah we should totally try and connect a comment made by an ancient historian to a racial category that was made 3000 years later. While we are at it, the "black Irish" are black, Turks from Turky are indeed a Bird-Human crossbreed and Hungarians are in need of a meal.
any Sanskrit texts like Raghu Vamsa,while detailing on the greatness of Suryavanshi kings,though not talked about directly on race,but clearly praise the purity and superiority of the generations of the Kings.This is very clear indirect reference which simply shows their courtesy.Those know the Sanskrit text only can understand this.
King Ongendus,Very few says your foolish theory,then all other Physical proofs of experts is foolish or they are foolish people.
Vedic texts state inclusively.Genetic reports and here people difference is prove that Aryan primarily Indoeuropean but they give more validity to culture than colour being spiritual based religion.You are failed scientifically.
racist lying prick trying to use just pictures and your own twisted text to prove your lies. go and watch proper videos by real experts, you armchair racist historian.
the nubians who came from the area now known as sudan have built pyramids before 2500bc, dating back to around 4500BC..there are about 100 pyramids in egypt, there are about 200 pyramids in SUDAN. the nubians conquered egypt and built more things for egypt. lying euro centric deniers like yourself claim that the nubians were influenced by egypt. what bullshit. what conquerer adapts the culture of the people it conquered. deny all you like you are hiding your ass in the sand. you should be banned
"Quite a few Egyptologists have defended the idea that the ancient Egyptians originally came from Asia. There never was any evidence to back up this view; and the only reason it was adopted, was because it was fashionable to believe that no African people was capable of developing a great civilization. Geoffrey Parsons refers to Egyptian civilization in his Stream of History, p. 154, New York & London, 1932, as "genuinely African in its origin and development."
black peoples who inhabited it as Ethiopians. Mention is made of Eastern and Western Ethiopians and it is probable that the Easterners were Asiatics and the Westerners Africans." (History of Ethiopia, Vol. I., Preface, by Sir E. A. Wallis Budge.
"In modern geography the name Ethiopia is confined to the country known as Abyssinia, an extensive territory in East Africa. In ancient times Ethiopia extended over vast domains in both Africa and Asia. "It seems certain," declares Sir E. A. Wallis Budge, "that classical historians and geographers called the whole region from India to Egypt, both countries inclusive, by the name of Ethiopia, and in consequence they regarded all the dark-skinned and
"So you people dont try to take others history.Aryans may be referred race or not but white people played an important part in the Vedic Aryan civilization"
"Nonsense!!Prove it!Foolish talks anybody make,but proving it difficult.You have not proved single point by any expert version till now,but simply talking like uneducated retarded person"
I hope you were staring in the mirror when you said that because I've provided plently of sources while you have provided NONE
The first such study dates back to 1999 and was conducted by the Estonian biologist Toomas Kivisild, a pioneer in the field, with fourteen co-authors from various nationalities (including M. J. Bamshad). It relied on 550 samples of mtDNA and identified a haplogroup called U as indicating a deep connection between Indian and Western-Eurasian populations.How genetic study proves Indian European relation,nonsense.Those experts are idiot,is it?
Nonsense!!Prove it!Foolish talks anybody make,but proving it difficult.You have not proved single point by any expert version till now,but simply talking like uneducated retarded person.
Whatever Yardstick Aryan is purely Indian and unique to Indian culture,on which only Iam saying that those Aryan or Indian people whatever you call, founded Sumerian and Egyptian civilizations.Here African connection was simply they were the ordinary majority people,ruling class belonged to Vedic people.Now,dont talk Dravidians.Aryan even if not race it is used by,for and to the people of India and their migrating people.
"Indus River" valley peoples lived in the Sarasvati River, which is mentioned in the Vedic manuscripts as a homeland. There is no biological or archaeological evidence of a massive invasion of people of a different race. K. Kris Hirst archaeologist Aboutcom Guide to Archaeology since 1997
"It turns out that there are serious problems with this argument. There are no references to an invasion in the Vedic manuscripts; and the Sanskrit word "Aryas" means "noble", not a superior cultural group. Secondly, recent archaeological evidence suggests that the Indus civilization was shut down by droughts combined with a devasting flood, not a violent confrontation. Recent archaeological evidence also shows that many of the so-called
that a nomadic horde of barbarians wrote books of such profound wisdom as the Vedas and Upanisads is nothing more than an absurdity and defies imagination" Svami B.V. Giri the myth of the aryan invasion
"Kenneth Kennedy of Cornell University has recently proven that there was no significant influx of people into India during 4500 to 800BC. Furthermore it is impossible for sites stretching over one thousand miles to have all become simultaneously abandoned due to the Invasion of Nomadic Tribes. There is no solid evidence that the Aryans belonged to a nomadic tribe. In fact, to suggest
"However (Kivisild 2003a; Kivisild 2003b) have revealed that a high frequency of haplogroup 3 (R1a1) occurs in about half of the male population of Northwestern India
I agree Ria is Indian and not Aryan as we now know Aryan is not a race or people but a title its like saying Mr and Mrs
"I have nothing invested in this, It's the other way round according to DNA and language distribution. population migration took place from central Asia to India and Europe, not from India to Europe"
Yeh right, R1a originated in India then moved to Europe
"To talk about Maxmueller is foolish,he only created the foolish Aryan Invasion theory which now proved as figment of imagination and experts debunked already"
"I have declared again and again that if I say Aryas, I mean neither blood nor bones, nor hair, nor skull; I mean simply those who speak an Aryan language...to me an ethnologist who speaks of Aryan race, Aryan blood, Aryan eyes and hair, is as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of a dolichocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar."
(Max Mueller, Biographies of Words and the Home of the Aryas, 1888, pg 120)
other eminent scholars and historians, Mueller could see that his reputation was in jeopardy and made the following statement, thus refuting his own theory
"The Sanskrit word Aryan refers to one who is righteous and noble. It is also used in the context of addressing a gentleman (Arya-putra, Aryakanya etc). Nowhere in the Vedic literature is the word used to denote race or language. This was a concoction by Max Mueller who, in 1853, introduced the word Arya into the English language as referring a particular race and language. He did this in order to give credibility to his Aryan race theory However in 1888, when challenged
How many discoveries and how many new leads,leaving all behind in backyard and talking without substantiating anything means what,it is willful guesses only whether it may be yours or somebody else.
Is it?Below go through, my dear,I have given genetic study of experts which proves clearly Aryan genes of India purely native and it shows from here only it spreads other places.Which DNA study,which language distribution validate your comments.Nonsense!Still,you people living in last century believing outdated fake theories.Most pathetic!!
Iranians are migrated people from India as clearly given by Rigveda and confirmed by all recent discoveries.There is no place in history for willful guesses.
"Iranians are migrated people from India as clearly given by Rigveda and confirmed by all recent discoveries.There is no place in history for willful guesses. "
willful guess? I have nothing invested in this, It's the other way round according to DNA and language distribution. population migration took place from central Asia to India and Europe, not from India to Europe.
The genetic study clearly shows that Primary source of Indoeuropean presence was India only,see though Vedic Aryans connected with west Europeans is wholly native to India and genetic study clearly proves Aryans migration from India only which are all proved by very recent discoveries.
The first such study dates back to 1999 and was conducted by the Estonian biologist Toomas Kivisild, a pioneer in the field, with fourteen co-authors from various nationalities (including M. J. Bamshad). It relied on 550 samples of mtDNA and identified a haplogroup called U as indicating a deep connection between Indian and Western-Eurasian populations.
We found an extensive deep late Pleistocene genetic link between contemporary Europeans and Indians, provided by the mtDNA haplogroup U, which encompasses roughly a fifth of mtDNA lineages of both populations. Our estimate for this split [between Europeans and Indians] is close to the suggested time for the peopling of Asia and the first expansion of anatomically modern humans in Eurasia and likely pre-dates their spread to Europe.
In other words, the timescale posited by the Aryan invasion / migration framework is inadequate, and the genetic affinity between the Indian subcontinent and Europe should not be interpreted in terms of a recent admixture of western Caucasoids10 with Indians caused by a putative Indo-Aryan invasion 3,0004,000 years BP.
The supposed Aryan invasion of India 3,0004,000 years before present therefore did not make a major splash in the Indian gene pool. This is especially counter-indicated by the presence of equal, though very low, frequencies of the western Eurasian mtDNA types in both southern and northern India. Thus, the caucasoid features of south Asians may best be considered pre-caucasoid
However (Kivisild 2003a; Kivisild 2003b) have revealed that a high frequency of haplogroup 3 (R1a1) occurs in about half of the male population of Northwestern India and is also frequent in Western Bengal. These results, together with the fact that haplogroup 3 is much less frequent in Iran and Anatolia than it is in India, indicates that haplogroup 3 found among high caste
Is experts are fools to name the category of speakers of those languages as Indoeuropean simply meaning those are connected with India.Prove that all those experts are fools except you.What genetic study in India says?I'll give.
First,If you think Aryan (Indoeuropean) is not in India,it is foolish,though they were not considered in India, colour only fix the superiority but culture.
To talk about Maxmueller is foolish,he only created the foolish Aryan Invasion theory which now proved as figment of imagination and experts debunked already.B.N.Lal clearly proved that Harappan culture is Vedic siting the archeological evidence.Dont give your bull shits.
"Prof B.B. Lal (1963) Indian archaeologists and Egyptologist has shown conclusively that the Dravidians originated in the Saharan area 5000 years ago"
Saraswathiputra you just have it the wrong way round
"Prof B.B. Lal (1963) Indian archaeologists and Egyptologist has shown conclusively that the Dravidians originated in the Saharan area 5000 years ago. He said they came from Kush, in the Fertile African Crescent and were related to the C-Group people who founded the Kerma dynasty in the 3rd millennium B.C. (Lal 1963) The Dravidians used a common black-and-red pottery, which spread from Nubia, through modern Ethiopia, Arabia, Iran into India as a result of the Proto-Saharan dispersal.(tehuti)
he has long given up. when someone,who is brown,with curly,woolen hair, repeats eurocentric garbage it is a shame. what a true colonialist. maybe queen elizabeth is Auret. Dravidians STILL hold on to beliefs that originated in KMT. the very word krishna means black or dark in sanskrit. why does buddah have an AFRICAN face? don't be ashamed to be descended from that great creator of civilizations which is AFRICA. free yourself! any time you touch a drum and sing or pray, thank MOTHER AFRICA!ASHE!
"I have declared again and again that if I say Aryas, I mean neither blood nor bones, nor hair, nor skull; I mean simply those who speak an Aryan language...to me an ethnologist who speaks of Aryan race, Aryan blood, Aryan eyes and hair, is as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of a dolichocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar."
(Max Mueller, Biographies of Words and the Home of the Aryas, 1888, pg 120)(tehuti)
to give credibility to his Aryan race theory However in 1888, when challenged by other eminent scholars and historians, Mueller could see that his reputation was in jeopardy and made the following statement, thus refuting his own theory
"The Sanskrit word Aryan refers to one who is righteous and noble. It is also used in the context of addressing a gentleman (Arya-putra, Aryakanya etc). Nowhere in the Vedic literature is the word used to denote race or language. This was a concoction by Max Mueller who, in 1853, introduced the word Arya into the English language as referring a particular race and language. He did this in order
As Egyptian has same letter for both.And we shall find Sargon in his own inscriptions calls his queen 'The LADY ASH'.
His designation as 'of the line of the PRABHU' clearly defines 'as of the line of the PHARAOHS'. PRABHU the Sanskrit word here means 'ruler,master,lord'and it is in series with prefixed title 'PRA'
Manasyu's father Pra-Vira identified as Sargon,here bears the title of Vira corresponding to his Pir title in old 'Isin' Sumerian king list,whilst Pra,in series with the longer form PRABHU, now appear to be equivalent of the Egyptian Paraa or Pharaoh.His mother name if Acchura Seni also confirm Manasyu's identity with Manis-Tusu.Her Indian name substantially equates as we shall see with Meopotamian name for Sargon's queen as Lady ASH-NAR also read ASH-LAL,l and r free interchangeable.
'Manasyu' by wife Su-vira,beget three sons Shakta,Samhana and Vagma,all heros and mighty chrioteers.Here fortunately preserved to us in the Indian epic,the concentrated tradition of the Aryan king Manasyu as Pharaoh of Gopta(Egypt),all in nutshell.His geneology fully authenticated back to his grand father PURU II who is Puru-Gin of the Sumerian Isin lists and his Egyptian inscriptions and URU-TA GINA,in his Mesopotamian mouments.
One of the Indian records of this king Manasyu and his ancestry states according to the reading.
'Puru' has by his wofe 'Pausti',three sons,Pra-Vira,Ishwara and Rudreswara,all of whom were mighty Charioteers.Amongst them Pra-Vira had by his wife 'Acchura Seni'a son named 'Manasyu'of the line of Prabho(Pharaoh)the royal eye of the Gopta(kopt or Egypt) and four ends of the earth.
And 'Sargon' in Puru version is called Pra-vera or 'foremost hero',in which Vira corresponds to his sumerian title of Pir,V being very late invented letter.
The name of this Aryan king under the form of Manasyu is formed the Lunar version of the Indo-Aryan king and corrosponding the Solar form of his name as MANJAS OR ASA MANJA.
You just flipping here and there,not refuting intellectually that Petrie or Waddell are fools!!Is it possible for you.
No nonsense talks.I continue this again,I can prove and give details to prove the antiquity of Vedic culture.Dont talk rubbish which you dont know like that of Solar dynasty kings.
"I cannot say in racial sense as Aryan is race but I can say Aryans are the people who founded the spirtuality based superior culture,native and unique to India,living atleast 10000 years in India"
Aryan is not a race or a people, sorry to burst your fantasy but 42 you must think father christmas is real as well hahahaha
I cannot say in racial sense as Aryan is race but I can say Aryans are the people who founded the spirtuality based superior culture,native and unique to India,living atleast 10000 years in India,but those people lived around them in those time very much differed in many aspects and very little cultured,later they made them as cultured people by founding civilizations.
First,ignorance is the root cause of foolishness.I can enlighten you people with accurate details of experts and modern discoveries which anybody can verify themselves.If anything wrong there,Iam ready to accept.Iam also telling the truth cannot be changed or covered by lies..See most of the westerners(but many know sincerely)because of ego just keeping silent.
Read "Egyptian Civilization Its Sumerian Origin and Real Chronology
By L. a. Waddell
Published by Kessinger Publishing, 2003
ISBN 0766142736, 9780766142732
292 pages.
He has the unique advantage of directly going there even in 1930s where lot of undestroyed sources were there.All aptly demostrated by actual photos and explanations.He had advantage Greek,Latin, well versed in Sanskrit besides very few who actually know to read Egyptian hieroglyphs and Sumerian pictograms.
So you people dont know the details of early Aryan king list existing in India.Pathetic!!The are well maintained text of SuryaVamsa Kings are there in Sanskrit.Read RaghuVamsa(Kings of Solar dynasty).Again,these king list well maintained before 2300 years also as per the Greek sources.Ignorance is the root cause of foolishness.
Wait,I give expert name and book name, you can also study and satisfy yourself.Each word here is not mine dear,but of well versed expert who mastered in Sanskrit and very few who elaborately studied and know to read Egyptian hieroglyphs and Sumerian pictgrams.
"In summary, various kinds of data and the evolutionary approach indicate that the Nile Valley populations had greater ties with other African populations in the early ancient period. Early Nile Valley populations were primarily coextensive with indigenous African populations. Linguistic and archaeological data provide key supporting evidence for a primarily African origin" Professor A. J. Boyce, University Reader in Human Population Oxford University (tehuti)
written on his own inscriptions by the self-same Sumerian pictograhic signs as in the sumerian king lists and in his own inscriptions as Sumerian Emperor in Mesopotamia.
Let us examine the detailed proofs of these identtities of Menes or Manj and his predynastic ancesstors in Egypt with thoe of Manis and his immediate imperial ancesstors In their contemporary inscription in Mesopotamia and in the Indian epic records of the early Aryan kings.
MENES OR MANIS-TUSU OR MANASYU,The Pharoah of Gopta.
and that the names and order from Sargon's son Manis onwards were identical with those of Menes dynasty of Pharaohs on their own Egyptian monuments.Has his nameMenes or Manj in his Egyptan inscriptians usually bears the title of Manj-the warrior and in the Sumerian king lists and his own inscriptions in Mesopotamia,the son and successor of the Sargon-the -great styled Manis-the warrior.And last king of this dynasty bearing the same name in both sumerian and Egyptian inscriptions,
who carried Jews into exile and from whom they distinguih the former as 'Sargon-the great'.
On comparing early Aryan king lists of Sanskrit texts with those of the Sumerian in Mesopotamia,I observed that the later documents also recorded in the self-same chronological position the dynasty of king Gin or Guni(Sargon-the-great)bearing susbstantially the same names and titles as the Indian lists and in exactly in the same order,(continued)
The Indian epic king lists further record that he was the son and the successor of the mighty world emperor King Kuni or Sha Kuni or Sagara,whom I had fully identified with the Mesopotamian world emperor whose name is variously spelt Kin,Gin,Guni or Shar-Guni,a name which is arbitrarily semitized by the assyriologists into 'Sargon' in order to equate it with Hebrew name 'Sargon' of the much later notorious semitic Assyrian king of that in the eighth century BC,
In the later he bears the name of 'Asa Manja' or 'Manja,the shooter' in the Splar version of the Indian Epic lists and Manasyu or Manas-the uniter in the lunar version.
And great Indian epic Mahabharata spplementing Purana Chronicle account describes him as Manasyu of the line of Prabhu(Paraas or Pharaoh)the royal eye of Gopta(Kopt or Egypt) and four ends of the earth.
The first clue to these discoveries were given by my observation that Menes(as he called by Greeks) or Manj(as he was called in his own Egyptian inscriptions)appears in due chronological position along with his dynasty in the official king list of the early Aryans from the first king onwards in Indian epic Chronicles,the Puranas.
the manner in which I was led to discover the truly historical character of Menes,his lost epoch making history and pre history,his genealogy continuously back through seven centuries to the first Sumerian Aryan king who was the traditional founder of Civilization and builder of the first city,his date and the fact that he was at one and same time Sumerian Emperor in Mesopotmia and first dynastic king or Pharaoh in Egypt as a crown colony of his world empire could be well understood from below.
The traditional founder of first dynasty of Egypt,although regularly cited in the native Egyptian king lists from the old chronology of Sety I downwards to Manetho as the founder of fist dynasty in Egypt has been shadowy and so little known not withstanding his discovey of his tomb with contemporary onscriptions by
Sir Flinders Petrie in the royal cemeteries at Abydos in 1900,
Ancient Egyptian ruling class is not African but Egypt predoninantly populated by blacks.Again,Egyptian ruling class were Vedic people from ancient India who also founders of Sumerian culture.
You're delusional the Ancient Egyptians were black africans besides the term caucasoid was discredited in 2007 so your story has no basis you might have well started it with "Once upon a time" hahahahaha
Our results suggest that the Gurna population has conserved the trace of an ancestral genetic structure from an ancestral East African population, characterized by a high M1 haplogroup frequency. The current structure of the Egyptian population may be the result of further influence of neighbouring populations on this ancestral population"
Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Diversity in a Sedentary Population from Egypt
A. Stevanovitch 1,**, A. Gilles 2 , E. Bouzaid 1 , R. Kefi 1 , F. Paris
"sorry, it doesn't. Want me to send you an Mtdna report?"
"The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) diversity of 58 individuals from Upper Egypt, more than half (34 individuals) from Gurna, whose population has an ancient cultural history, were studied by sequencing the control-region and screening diagnostic RFLP markers. This sedentary population presented similarities to the Ethiopian population by the L1 and L2 macrohaplogroup frequency (20.6%)
You see the caucasoid was light skin with black, brown or red hair (mummies). This was before the nubians took over for awhile. It would be like the USA if in 80 years the blacks overpopulated and they became the majority, they would bury (not literally) the white history. That in 500 years it could be taught the blacks founded and ruled the USA. It is very similar in Egypt. The nubians were slaves of the Egytians. The semites were white to bronze in complextion. King Tuts cane and sandals.
bxlunar- did you know that chimpanzees consistently perform better on standardized tests than afroamericans? now how you gonna convince anyone that a bunch of spear carrying primitives of low intelligence can construct a civilization? for the negro the opposable thumb only serves to pick his fleas. how can you claim to know anything about your heritage when you do not even know who your father is
bxlunar- they are white. as far as surviving in various climates- face it- it happens- we have clothing hats etc to protect us from the sun, cold etcetera- of course clothing is a recent concept to negroes as anyone who reads national geographic knows. by the way- GOD is WHITE too- word to your nappy headed trick turning mama
you are sick and demented. the language of KMT is known and accepted by various PHDs as being AFRICAN. oh btw, that nappy hair shows who the original ppl. were. nappy hair and dark skin=protection from the sun. hairy,white and blue eyes=NEANDERTHAL CAVE DWELLER. who had to wear a lot of clothing in AFRICA because it wasn't NATURAL for him to be there.GOD IS NOT WHITE SINCE BLACKS WERE THE FIRST PEOPLE ON THE PLANET!!!check your DNA and it will tell you. are you 12? or just sssssstupid?
they look caucasian to me- i doubt negroes could build an advanced civilization with high technology- too busy lying stealing and eating fried chicken and smoking crack, pimping their hoes etc. the mediterraneans must have done this- good argument plaintruth, this really exposes the shoddy scholarship of envious ego deficient afro americans. of course we must credit the african slave labor too. word to your nappy headed mamas
well if they do look white to you, then, you are mentally unwell. who created the ills of society and forced it on us? who forced religions sans spirit on their slaves? that's YOUR culture. why don't you leave your cave and go read a book. if they were white, that would mean that whites started out in AFRICA.then that would mean that whites could survive in a climate that would no doubt kill them and, populate the rest of the human race. that's sad. ppl of color are the majority so how is that?
{LMAO - White Egypt? White Africa? LMFAO!! Keep dreaming. I feel sorry for white folk actually! Because they have been lied to and almost extinct hahaahha}
Caucasians Outnumber Blacks on planet earth nearly five to one genius.
Quit smoking so much chronic and throw your crack pipe away .
ThoriumRex 3 years ago 23
Caucasians have recessive genes and aren't able to produce offspring. Whites are 8% of world population blacks outnumber and hispanics in world population we are second in population to the chinese. LOL were did you get this 5 to 1 statistic when europeans and hispanics put together can't outnumber blacks in world poulation. As far as black egypt I can name one who demolished europeans Cheikh Anta Diop. He debated with the best of your idiot scholars who had no facts in there arguments only lies
producerbigsouth 3 years ago
The only reason North Africa is Arab is because of conquest. Just like North America natives were slaughtered to make way for savage racist murderers. Im not sure what they were, but the Egyptians were definately not fucking white! They were either black, arab or a mix between the two.
SubiyaCryolite 3 years ago
That's your opinion. The mummies and DNA say they are North African Caucasoid.
"savage racist murderers"? Ever look at inner-cities or most of Africa? You're one to talk.
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago 97
The Mummies and DNA say they were North African Caucasoid. Egypt recorded some of the hottest temperatures on earth you europeans couldnt survive in extremely hot temperatures. Let me ask you this question. Did europeans leave all that ice in europe go to africa build a superior civilization such as Egypt or Khemet and leave the civilization go back to europe and have nothing thats resembles a pyramid a oblice or anything from the civilization you built. I can name many other kingdoms in africa
producerbigsouth 3 years ago
Dude, I don't know what the hell you're smoking, but mummies and DNA don't lie. Do you even know what caucasoid means?
Your ignorance is incredible. Egyptians were and still are a mediterranean people. Who the hell claims Euros left the ice to come to Egypt?? And then Euros can't live in hot climates?? Whites have traveled and colonized every corner of this planet.
Get off the dope and take your Afrocentric spamming elsewhere.
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago 103
"You Afrocentrics are truly nutcases. That's why nobody takes your views seriously. I don't see anyone here claiming it a Euro civilization, but a mediterranean civilization."
Its because they only see black and white. They have no understanding of the world as most of them have never been outside the US. They dont get that Africa has always has lighter colored people in the north, and the difference between North and South Egypt. They are just spoon fed by 5 books and recycle the content.
braahp360 3 years ago 47
LMAO - White Egypt? White Africa? LMFAO!! Keep dreaming. I feel sorry for white folk actually! Because they have been lied to and almost extinct hahaahha
cosso89 3 years ago
Almost extinct... lol! There are more White people on earth now than any time in history, and alot better off than you.
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago 48
Anyway, don't believe anything anyone says here, unless it comes from a real egyptologist/ archaeologist like me;) These people here abuse Ancient Egypt only to vent their inferior, racist views. Tomorrow, my mailbox will be full again with reactions from racists of all colour that I should read more about Egypt blabla, haha! And yours will be too! And you'll feel the urge to react, although the discussion leads to nothing. Welcome to the club, ItalianoAmericano!;)
Nefertete1980 3 years ago
There were scholars who tried to claim that great Zimbabwia wasn't created by blacks though the sight shows indiginous African insignia. In the same professinal formal mannor , they claimed it (Grt Zmbw) to be the product of Solomon, and other cultures. Anything but the obvious black that lived in the area. And with Kemit it's the same thing. Blacks still live in the Southern area and are muted out as though they aint there. Stay on Ytbe and see Who's Stealing History pt1.
shariefwat 3 years ago
Do you actually believe that? In Zimbabwe? Hahahahaha!!! Are you okay?
Nefertete1980 3 years ago
If you would have read more of my reactions, also on Afrocentric vids, you should know I am wondering the same as you do. I reacted on a comment given by Theplaintruth, which he removed. Guys like him and Painoftruth are actually doing the same as all these Afrocentrics,only they have this Eurocentric point of view. I agree with you. Afrocentrics and Eurocentrics are all f*#king racists!
Nefertete1980 3 years ago
It is true that the Ancient Egyptians were mixed: blacks, semites etc. together. No Egyptian museum in the world would buy your story that the Ancient Egyptians were plain white! Accept the fact that Egypt was an African culture, dude!
The orange hair you showed on the mural can be a headdress. The red hair on mummies can be henna or a loss of pigment in the hair due to the chemical reaction in the mummification process. And so on...Read more on Egypt if you want to claim something!
Nefertete1980 3 years ago
white people in ancient egypt LOLOLOLOL anything white in Kemet was long after the great dynastys starting with alexander,the ptolomeys etc people just cant believe blacks could have done anything in AFRICA why dont you go to other countries like china and say you built the great wall too . thats why all the noses are defaced that show african features but it still doesnt hide who they are look at the shinx from the side we are hip to your usurping and its petiful white man lies,, sad
caddy1010 3 years ago
aight this is the most bullshittities video ever; excuse my language ppl, iam not trying to put anybody down no races at all iam not some black panther fool or some 9 year old kid talking out of his ass, iam am a college student but iam not no honor student so yeah, i got a scholarship to play ball at San Diego State Unv. so I think iam pretty smart so yeah back to the subject
thirdbaseman94 3 years ago
CAIRO -- Egyptian antiquities supremo Zahi Hawass insisted Tuesday that Tutankhamun was not black despite calls by US black activists to recognize the boy king's dark skin color.
"Tutankhamun was not black, and the portrayal of ancient Egyptian civilization as black has no element of truth to it," Hawass told reporters.
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago 26
Yes, but can you say he is white then????Have you ever seen more intervieuws with Uncle Zahi?The things he said, omg, put other egyptologists in shame! Let's start with watching less Discovery and Nat.Geographic, will ye, and READ more!
Nefertete1980 3 years ago
Hawass is a liar - ask any of the Egyptians - if he told the truth about Egypt - he would lose billions - I am sorry but I am no longer fazed by your lies!
Egypt is in Africa - many Egyptians regard themselves as Africa - your euro clown mind tricks are crumbling away! Your illusions of fake granduer is falling. Must be hard to swallow the truth after being elevated for so long.
cosso89 3 years ago
Hawass is a liar, but you know it all. What a relief!
Egypt is on the African continent. Very good. Russia is in Asia. I guess that makes those Russians Chinese or Indian? Nice logic.
I never claimed that Egyptians were White (though there were some). Maybe you should look at the racial makeup of Northern Africa a little more. They are Caucasoid for the most part.
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago 16
Of the language spoken by the copper-tone-woolly-hair [Indians] Moors in the West-Indies/Americas for the speaking of the Hebrew/Chaldean/Arabic in the 1490's-C. E. For the referencing by the Cristobal Colon [Christopher: Columbus] for the sending of the interpreters before the King of the Cuba for the speaking of the Hebrew/Chaldean/Arabic for the referencing on the November: 2, in the Columbus-Diaries
Jack forbes
AELMYRCAamorica 3 years ago
Do you believe in what Herodotus, Aristotle, Diodorus, Champollion, Count de Volney, Tacitus, and Flavius Josephus say?When they say the Ancient Egyptians were black like all native born Africans, like all black Africans with Afro hair. Do you believe them? The truth.. but these people's only believe what they wanna believe.. it does not matter how many proof you show them fok these white & arab thefes
OSORIOO 3 years ago
You stupid a Cushid is an afrikan.. even todat you have black people of diffrend colors so what is your problem
OSORIOO 3 years ago
A black, or blackmor,* Maurus, Æthiops, blackmoor -woman,* Maura.
A moor, or blackamoor,*.Ethiops. A woman moor,*Æthiopiffa*
*Æthiopicus, a, um. adj. Of Æthiopia. The
ancients called the Chaldeans and Phoenicians
Æthiopians, Strab. and Tactitus....
AELMYRCAamorica 3 years ago
It whas not Hippocrates who claimed it you PUTA.. is whas Herodotus
OSORIOO 3 years ago
Do you believe in what Herodotus, Aristotle, Diodorus, Champollion, Count de Volney, Tacitus, and Flavius Josephus say?When they say the Ancient Egyptians were black like all native born Africans, like all black Africans with Afro hair. Do you believe them?
AELMYRCAamorica 3 years ago
æl-myrca, an; m. All sallow, a black man, an Ethiopian; omnino fuscus, Æthiops :-- On ælmyrcan éðel-ríce in the realm of the Ethiopian, Andr. Kmbl. 863; An. 432.
AMORICA -AMERICA- ÆL-MYRCA
AMORICA was all territories of ancient British Isles and iberia - BLACKS -MOORS
I do not need speak about America we all know the History of the Moors in Terra Nova-(AMERICA)
ÆL-MYRCA -realm of the Ethiopian
(CUSH-EGYPTIANS-NUBIAN-PHOENCI AN-BLACKS-MOORS)
MOOR
Æthiop - Æthiopiffa
AELMYRCAamorica 3 years ago
What page number did you get that quote from again? ISBN, I would like to read that.
AELMYRCAamorica 3 years ago
Im quoting white historians, how can they be deemed afrocentric?
AELMYRCAamorica 3 years ago
BOOK. PAGE NUMBER, QUOTE OF PAGE NUMBER AND ISBN please.
smiling.
AELMYRCAamorica 3 years ago
Do you believe in what Herodotus, Aristotle, Diodorus, Champollion, Count de Volney, Tacitus, and Flavius Josephus say?When they say the Ancient Egyptians were black like all native born Africans, like all black Africans with Afro hair. Do you believe them?
AELMYRCAamorica 3 years ago
æl-myrca, an; m. All sallow, a black man, an Ethiopian; omnino fuscus, Æthiops :-- On ælmyrcan éðel-ríce in the realm of the Ethiopian, Andr. Kmbl. 863; An. 432.
AMORICA -AMERICA- ÆL-MYRCA
AMORICA was all territories of ancient British Isles and iberia - BLACKS -MOORS
I do not need speak about America we all know the History of the Moors in Terra Nova-(AMERICA)
ÆL-MYRCA -realm of the Ethiopian
(CUSH-EGYPTIANS-NUBIAN-PHOENCI AN-BLACKS-MOORS)
MOOR
Æthiop - Æthiopiffa
AELMYRCAamorica 3 years ago
A black, or blackmor,* Maurus, Æthiops, blackmoor -woman,* Maura.
A moor, or blackamoor,*.Ethiops. A woman moor,*Æthiopiffa*
*Æthiopicus, a, um. adj. Of Æthiopia. The
ancients called the Chaldeans and Phoenicians
Æthiopians, Strab. and Tactitus....
Latin language -- Dictionaries
AELMYRCAamorica 3 years ago
The Ancient Greeks werent white! They were black - ironic huh?
SubiyaCryolite 3 years ago
Why are African Americans taking credit for ancient Egypt?
African Americans are descendants of West Africa. Egypt is in North Africa so why are people from West Africa taking credit for Egyption history?
That is like Filipinos taking credit for the Great Wall of China.
Just because you live on the same continent doesn't make it your history.
I'm not black or white, I don't have any racial bias towards anyone. I'm just trying to understand where this is all coming from?
sciencenerd213 3 years ago 164
Why are caucasians always being deceptive.
Africa
L1, L2, and L3 are all from Sub-Saharan Africa.
Haplogroup L1 is found in West and Central sub-Saharan Africa. It is especially common among the Khoisan [Bushmen] people.
All existing human haplogroups are descended from haplogroup L1.
Among these descendants are the African offspring haplogroups L2 and L3, the latter of which gave rise to all non-African haplogroups.
You are trying to be deceptive, but its not working.
AELMYRCAamorica 3 years ago
"The two main genetic clusters found in Egypt are Haplogroups E (E-M35, E-M78 and E-M81) and J-M267. The E clusters all originated within Sub-Saharan East Africa or Central Africa. E-M81 derived from the ancestral East African E-M35 lineage that spread to North Africa along with E-M78 during the early Holocene. J-M267 is derived from the Arab invasion" ,Am J. Hum. Genet. 74 (5): 101422.
smiling
AELMYRCAamorica 3 years ago
What makes me laugh is that european are
(Type R halpogroups) and the back migration that they ellude to is called the Arab invasion of 700AD, 1,400 years ago.
L1, L2, L3 are the progenitor of humanity.
AELMYRCAamorica 3 years ago
The Holocene is a geological epoch which began approximately 10,000 years ago (about 8000 BC).
This means the central and sub-sahran people populated north and west Africa 10,000 years ago, and this also means no Khazar-caucasian or Arabs or some fake class caucasians called Berbers.
JM267 is due to the arab invasion 1,400 years ago, thus did not have anything to do with the building of Ancient Egypt.
AELMYRCAamorica 3 years ago
"JM267 is due to the arab invasion 1,400 years ago, thus did not have anything to do with the building of Ancient Egypt. "
Actually its largely from the neolithic but hey don't let that ruin your fantasy.
PaulBlank85 3 years ago 9
PaulBlank85 Actually the Holocene predates Neolithic., ut hey don't let that ruin your fantasy.
AELMYRCAamorica 3 years ago
It's just another video among so many others.Others will show you different things as well.
I was watching a documentary about AE,not that long ago, as most of the pharaohs on the doc were represented with full lips they explained this fact by the... painting style !
If i paint scandinavians in blond then it just due to the painting style !!!
ArmadadeSauvages 3 years ago
Are you blind? Or stupid? Because only a fool would think these famous mummies are negroid. But, like you said, they pretend they aren't negro to keep the tourism up. LOL! You idiots are a laughing stock! What next? Cleopatra wasblack too? Smoke another one.
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago 3
Cleopatra whas off greek decent.. the ancient egyptians where black.. why do you as a white boy care.. you whites claim greek & roman achievement while you where from west europa stupid
OSORIOO 3 years ago
No, you can dream they were all black, but as this video and every Egyptian museum in the world doesn't agree with you.
lol! White boy? Stupid? And then you wonder why you black racists get banned.
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago 2
Your reply about south-america and its ancient civilisation was not quite clear, but anyway.
ArmadadeSauvages 3 years ago
North-africa= Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco, Lybia, and slightly Egypt which is surrounded By Tchad,Sudan.
So look at the map more clearly.
ArmadadeSauvages 3 years ago
Unbelievable. So what part of Africa is Egypt located at, fool. It`s like trying to reason with children. Go spam elsewhere.
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago
Because they're not. :-) Most people of North African ancestry are not negro (but some are).
One can only laugh at the Afrocentrics claims. All one has to do is look at sub-saharan Africa and see all that advanced knowledge... [/sarcasm]
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago
ThePlaintruth14,
You've cleaned your act up and unlike some cowardly ignorant individuals like Sagitario, you allow people to answer. your racist attacks.
What make you think AE are linked to north-africans ? I grew up with north-aAricans and none of them makes such a claim.They aboslutely don't link themselves with AE.
The only thing laughable is your claim.
ArmadadeSauvages 3 years ago
"All one has to do is look at sub-saharan Africa and see all that advanced knowledge... [/sarcasm]"
So, seeing the current pityful state of South-america, according to your bright analysis(sarcasm) They never had a great civilisation: Inca, maya, Aztec.
And you've never been to Africa, anyway.
North-africans would laught at you if you told them they're descendants of AE.
ArmadadeSauvages 3 years ago
How does South America come into this? Are you on dope?
Last time I looked on a map Egypt is in northern Africa. Did it move in your doped up mind?
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago
LOL! And your claims? No Egyptian museum in the world supports the Afrocentric claims, including Egypt. Now why is that... :-)
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago
"No Egyptian museum in the world supports the Afrocentric claims, including Egypt."
Because AE tourism is their main if not only resource.
ArmadadeSauvages 3 years ago
Ancient-EgyptIans aren't a specific race.
If the current arabo-egyptians are descendants of Ancient-egyptians, then how come there's no trace of it in North-african countries or in the arab world ?
I draw a pyramid to an old berber once, it was just like mystery to him.
Please !
ArmadadeSauvages 3 years ago
Ancient Egyptians aren't a specific race, true. They certainally aren't Negroid. That's the whole point of this video.
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago 4
It depends on what you mean by Negroids.
Didn't you see so many paintings of AE with people represented with full lips ?
ArmadadeSauvages 3 years ago
and what are they.. white ???
OSORIOO 3 years ago
Some were, yes. Most were Egyptian. The Nubia invasion (25th dynasty) had control of Egypt for a time, followed by many others.
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago
sweetheart stop spreading lies. I CANT WAIT TO PUT MY ACCOUNT UP. To all the black people, EGYPT WAS AND WILL ALWAYS BE BLACK. Its in AFRICA, why are you listening to white people? YOU KNOW THEY ARE LIARS AND RACISTS. egypt began around 3000 B.C.E. IT WAS RULED BY BLACK KINGS. Stop tainted our culture. and if you want to know more I WILL TELL YOU, I AM A COLLEGE HONOR STUDENT, AND I KNOW IM SMARTER THAN YOU. lol
SuccessWILLcome7 3 years ago
And Russia is in Asia. Does that make Russians Chinese? Your logic is hilarious! Most North Africans look Caucasian because they are Mediterranean.
Another racist... let's see, Whites are liars and racists, and you're going to tell me about history? The reason you're so upset is that this video doesn't show blacks as ancient Egyptians. Because most of them are not.
Get your black racist buddies to "TELL" every Egyptian museum in the world to demand your views. Good luck, and good bye.
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago 12
Unbelievable. Have you watched this video? Do those mummies look negroid to you? Mummies don't lie. But people like you do.
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago
good remark paulblank85- you show good understanding of nigger knowledge, nigger logic and nigger reasoning skills. by the way- GOD is white. you niggers ought to keep this in mind when you are committing all the crimes you engage in
mrallcock 3 years ago
"black Irish" are black, Turks from Turky are indeed a Bird-Human crossbreed and Hungarians are in need of a meal"
If you had a source to back that up and not Mickey Mouse then I would listen to you but in this case Im NOT because Your logic can only be explained by you being DRUNK as usual the fact is
KingOngendus 3 years ago
maybe there mixed people.a lot of mixed people have brown skin with smaller features
love7277 3 years ago
these would be arabs not white people.
love7277 3 years ago
Yeah we should totally try and connect a comment made by an ancient historian to a racial category that was made 3000 years later. While we are at it, the "black Irish" are black, Turks from Turky are indeed a Bird-Human crossbreed and Hungarians are in need of a meal.
PaulBlank85 3 years ago 3
Saraswathiputra
Without sources you're wasting your time with your fictional stories
KingOngendus 3 years ago
You people still lack any basic thinking power,dreaming as if founded civilizations!Funny and pathetic!!
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Without Sumerian arrival in Egypt, Egyptians themselves adopted Sumerian notations,is it?
so you mean to say without British rule in India,Indians themselves adopted English in many spheres now,is it?Most foolish!!
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
any Sanskrit texts like Raghu Vamsa,while detailing on the greatness of Suryavanshi kings,though not talked about directly on race,but clearly praise the purity and superiority of the generations of the Kings.This is very clear indirect reference which simply shows their courtesy.Those know the Sanskrit text only can understand this.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
In many cases both pictograms and hieroglyphs gives exactly the same meaning and with same notations.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Again,many experts who directly researched proved Predynasty definitely Sumerians.Egyptian hieroglyphs proved conclusive arrived from Sumerian pictograms.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
King Ongendus,Very few says your foolish theory,then all other Physical proofs of experts is foolish or they are foolish people.
Vedic texts state inclusively.Genetic reports and here people difference is prove that Aryan primarily Indoeuropean but they give more validity to culture than colour being spiritual based religion.You are failed scientifically.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
"Dude Egypt and summeria was already founded by black africans as was india read the comments again "
Sumeria and India were not founded by blacks or other Africans. One glance at how Asiatics were depicted by Egyptians would tell you that.
PaulBlank85 3 years ago 3
"One glance at how Asiatics were depicted by Egyptians would tell you that. "
Hell, one glance at Sumerian art would tell you, lol!.
EVERYONE! Google "Sumerian art" and take a close look at the "black" Sumerians, lol!!!!
And KingO, aren't you a 5'6" bushmen?
123duffbeerrules 3 years ago
racist lying prick trying to use just pictures and your own twisted text to prove your lies. go and watch proper videos by real experts, you armchair racist historian.
pirell 3 years ago
the nubians who came from the area now known as sudan have built pyramids before 2500bc, dating back to around 4500BC..there are about 100 pyramids in egypt, there are about 200 pyramids in SUDAN. the nubians conquered egypt and built more things for egypt. lying euro centric deniers like yourself claim that the nubians were influenced by egypt. what bullshit. what conquerer adapts the culture of the people it conquered. deny all you like you are hiding your ass in the sand. you should be banned
pirell 3 years ago
"Quite a few Egyptologists have defended the idea that the ancient Egyptians originally came from Asia. There never was any evidence to back up this view; and the only reason it was adopted, was because it was fashionable to believe that no African people was capable of developing a great civilization. Geoffrey Parsons refers to Egyptian civilization in his Stream of History, p. 154, New York & London, 1932, as "genuinely African in its origin and development."
KingOngendus 3 years ago
black peoples who inhabited it as Ethiopians. Mention is made of Eastern and Western Ethiopians and it is probable that the Easterners were Asiatics and the Westerners Africans." (History of Ethiopia, Vol. I., Preface, by Sir E. A. Wallis Budge.
KingOngendus 3 years ago
"In modern geography the name Ethiopia is confined to the country known as Abyssinia, an extensive territory in East Africa. In ancient times Ethiopia extended over vast domains in both Africa and Asia. "It seems certain," declares Sir E. A. Wallis Budge, "that classical historians and geographers called the whole region from India to Egypt, both countries inclusive, by the name of Ethiopia, and in consequence they regarded all the dark-skinned and
KingOngendus 3 years ago
"So you people dont try to take others history.Aryans may be referred race or not but white people played an important part in the Vedic Aryan civilization"
Its funny how Vedic manuscripts don't state that
KingOngendus 3 years ago
"Nonsense!!Prove it!Foolish talks anybody make,but proving it difficult.You have not proved single point by any expert version till now,but simply talking like uneducated retarded person"
I hope you were staring in the mirror when you said that because I've provided plently of sources while you have provided NONE
KingOngendus 3 years ago
So you people dont try to take others history.Aryans may be referred race or not but
white people played an important part in the Vedic Aryan civilization,That is the truth the genetic study proves which could not be denied.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
The first such study dates back to 1999 and was conducted by the Estonian biologist Toomas Kivisild, a pioneer in the field, with fourteen co-authors from various nationalities (including M. J. Bamshad). It relied on 550 samples of mtDNA and identified a haplogroup called U as indicating a deep connection between Indian and Western-Eurasian populations.How genetic study proves Indian European relation,nonsense.Those experts are idiot,is it?
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Indus is African,Is it?From what date?
That is why all sites of Indus sites proved now in dried Saraswathi river basin which RV says as Vedic river and basis of Vedic culture.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Nonsense!!Prove it!Foolish talks anybody make,but proving it difficult.You have not proved single point by any expert version till now,but simply talking like uneducated retarded person.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
"Here African connection was simply they were the ordinary majority people,ruling class belonged to Vedic people"
The african Cushites and Elamites were first in india (indus)
KingOngendus 3 years ago
"Good to see you've taken up the gauntlet and winning keep up the good work"
Thanks Tehuti its very easy as I'm finding people here have no knowledge
KingOngendus 3 years ago
Whatever Yardstick Aryan is purely Indian and unique to Indian culture,on which only Iam saying that those Aryan or Indian people whatever you call, founded Sumerian and Egyptian civilizations.Here African connection was simply they were the ordinary majority people,ruling class belonged to Vedic people.Now,dont talk Dravidians.Aryan even if not race it is used by,for and to the people of India and their migrating people.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
"Indus River" valley peoples lived in the Sarasvati River, which is mentioned in the Vedic manuscripts as a homeland. There is no biological or archaeological evidence of a massive invasion of people of a different race. K. Kris Hirst archaeologist Aboutcom Guide to Archaeology since 1997
TehutiNeteru 3 years ago
how did these clowns get this video back up
INVASION2012 3 years ago
Why would this video be down in the first place, fool? I know someting that is gone; it's you.
ThePlainTruth14 3 years ago
"It turns out that there are serious problems with this argument. There are no references to an invasion in the Vedic manuscripts; and the Sanskrit word "Aryas" means "noble", not a superior cultural group. Secondly, recent archaeological evidence suggests that the Indus civilization was shut down by droughts combined with a devasting flood, not a violent confrontation. Recent archaeological evidence also shows that many of the so-called
TehutiNeteru 3 years ago
that a nomadic horde of barbarians wrote books of such profound wisdom as the Vedas and Upanisads is nothing more than an absurdity and defies imagination" Svami B.V. Giri the myth of the aryan invasion
TehutiNeteru 3 years ago
"Kenneth Kennedy of Cornell University has recently proven that there was no significant influx of people into India during 4500 to 800BC. Furthermore it is impossible for sites stretching over one thousand miles to have all become simultaneously abandoned due to the Invasion of Nomadic Tribes. There is no solid evidence that the Aryans belonged to a nomadic tribe. In fact, to suggest
TehutiNeteru 3 years ago
"However (Kivisild 2003a; Kivisild 2003b) have revealed that a high frequency of haplogroup 3 (R1a1) occurs in about half of the male population of Northwestern India
I agree Ria is Indian and not Aryan as we now know Aryan is not a race or people but a title its like saying Mr and Mrs
KingOngendus 3 years ago
"I have nothing invested in this, It's the other way round according to DNA and language distribution. population migration took place from central Asia to India and Europe, not from India to Europe"
Yeh right, R1a originated in India then moved to Europe
"To talk about Maxmueller is foolish,he only created the foolish Aryan Invasion theory which now proved as figment of imagination and experts debunked already"
Yes you're correct so stop mentioning it
KingOngendus 3 years ago
"I have declared again and again that if I say Aryas, I mean neither blood nor bones, nor hair, nor skull; I mean simply those who speak an Aryan language...to me an ethnologist who speaks of Aryan race, Aryan blood, Aryan eyes and hair, is as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of a dolichocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar."
(Max Mueller, Biographies of Words and the Home of the Aryas, 1888, pg 120)
KingOngendus 3 years ago
other eminent scholars and historians, Mueller could see that his reputation was in jeopardy and made the following statement, thus refuting his own theory
Svami B.V. Giri the myth of the aryan invasion
KingOngendus 3 years ago
"The Sanskrit word Aryan refers to one who is righteous and noble. It is also used in the context of addressing a gentleman (Arya-putra, Aryakanya etc). Nowhere in the Vedic literature is the word used to denote race or language. This was a concoction by Max Mueller who, in 1853, introduced the word Arya into the English language as referring a particular race and language. He did this in order to give credibility to his Aryan race theory However in 1888, when challenged
KingOngendus 3 years ago
"Actually there is, Iranians are the Aryans"
Keep dreaming dude
KingOngendus 3 years ago
How many discoveries and how many new leads,leaving all behind in backyard and talking without substantiating anything means what,it is willful guesses only whether it may be yours or somebody else.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Is it?Below go through, my dear,I have given genetic study of experts which proves clearly Aryan genes of India purely native and it shows from here only it spreads other places.Which DNA study,which language distribution validate your comments.Nonsense!Still,you people living in last century believing outdated fake theories.Most pathetic!!
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Iranians are migrated people from India as clearly given by Rigveda and confirmed by all recent discoveries.There is no place in history for willful guesses.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
"Iranians are migrated people from India as clearly given by Rigveda and confirmed by all recent discoveries.There is no place in history for willful guesses. "
willful guess? I have nothing invested in this, It's the other way round according to DNA and language distribution. population migration took place from central Asia to India and Europe, not from India to Europe.
PaulBlank85 3 years ago
The genetic study clearly shows that Primary source of Indoeuropean presence was India only,see though Vedic Aryans connected with west Europeans is wholly native to India and genetic study clearly proves Aryans migration from India only which are all proved by very recent discoveries.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
The first such study dates back to 1999 and was conducted by the Estonian biologist Toomas Kivisild, a pioneer in the field, with fourteen co-authors from various nationalities (including M. J. Bamshad). It relied on 550 samples of mtDNA and identified a haplogroup called U as indicating a deep connection between Indian and Western-Eurasian populations.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
We found an extensive deep late Pleistocene genetic link between contemporary Europeans and Indians, provided by the mtDNA haplogroup U, which encompasses roughly a fifth of mtDNA lineages of both populations. Our estimate for this split [between Europeans and Indians] is close to the suggested time for the peopling of Asia and the first expansion of anatomically modern humans in Eurasia and likely pre-dates their spread to Europe.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
In other words, the timescale posited by the Aryan invasion / migration framework is inadequate, and the genetic affinity between the Indian subcontinent and Europe should not be interpreted in terms of a recent admixture of western Caucasoids10 with Indians caused by a putative Indo-Aryan invasion 3,0004,000 years BP.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
The supposed Aryan invasion of India 3,0004,000 years before present therefore did not make a major splash in the Indian gene pool. This is especially counter-indicated by the presence of equal, though very low, frequencies of the western Eurasian mtDNA types in both southern and northern India. Thus, the caucasoid features of south Asians may best be considered pre-caucasoid
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
However (Kivisild 2003a; Kivisild 2003b) have revealed that a high frequency of haplogroup 3 (R1a1) occurs in about half of the male population of Northwestern India and is also frequent in Western Bengal. These results, together with the fact that haplogroup 3 is much less frequent in Iran and Anatolia than it is in India, indicates that haplogroup 3 found among high caste
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Is experts are fools to name the category of speakers of those languages as Indoeuropean simply meaning those are connected with India.Prove that all those experts are fools except you.What genetic study in India says?I'll give.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
First,If you think Aryan (Indoeuropean) is not in India,it is foolish,though they were not considered in India, colour only fix the superiority but culture.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
KingOngendus,you people have lot of foolish complexes which make you foolish and deny the truth.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
To talk about Maxmueller is foolish,he only created the foolish Aryan Invasion theory which now proved as figment of imagination and experts debunked already.B.N.Lal clearly proved that Harappan culture is Vedic siting the archeological evidence.Dont give your bull shits.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Vedic culture is unique to India.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
"Prof B.B. Lal (1963) Indian archaeologists and Egyptologist has shown conclusively that the Dravidians originated in the Saharan area 5000 years ago"
Saraswathiputra you just have it the wrong way round
debunked
KingOngendus 3 years ago
"Prof B.B. Lal (1963) Indian archaeologists and Egyptologist has shown conclusively that the Dravidians originated in the Saharan area 5000 years ago. He said they came from Kush, in the Fertile African Crescent and were related to the C-Group people who founded the Kerma dynasty in the 3rd millennium B.C. (Lal 1963) The Dravidians used a common black-and-red pottery, which spread from Nubia, through modern Ethiopia, Arabia, Iran into India as a result of the Proto-Saharan dispersal.(tehuti)
KingOngendus 3 years ago
Saraswathiputra
Show me the genetics that proves Indians entered Egypt
KingOngendus 3 years ago
he has long given up. when someone,who is brown,with curly,woolen hair, repeats eurocentric garbage it is a shame. what a true colonialist. maybe queen elizabeth is Auret. Dravidians STILL hold on to beliefs that originated in KMT. the very word krishna means black or dark in sanskrit. why does buddah have an AFRICAN face? don't be ashamed to be descended from that great creator of civilizations which is AFRICA. free yourself! any time you touch a drum and sing or pray, thank MOTHER AFRICA!ASHE!
bxlunar 3 years ago
"I have declared again and again that if I say Aryas, I mean neither blood nor bones, nor hair, nor skull; I mean simply those who speak an Aryan language...to me an ethnologist who speaks of Aryan race, Aryan blood, Aryan eyes and hair, is as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of a dolichocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar."
(Max Mueller, Biographies of Words and the Home of the Aryas, 1888, pg 120)(tehuti)
Theres no Aryan race or people
debnuked
KingOngendus 3 years ago
"Theres no Aryan race or people "
Actually there is, Iranians are the Aryans.
PaulBlank85 3 years ago
to give credibility to his Aryan race theory However in 1888, when challenged by other eminent scholars and historians, Mueller could see that his reputation was in jeopardy and made the following statement, thus refuting his own theory
Svami B.V. Giri the myth of the aryan invasion
KingOngendus 3 years ago
"The Sanskrit word Aryan refers to one who is righteous and noble. It is also used in the context of addressing a gentleman (Arya-putra, Aryakanya etc). Nowhere in the Vedic literature is the word used to denote race or language. This was a concoction by Max Mueller who, in 1853, introduced the word Arya into the English language as referring a particular race and language. He did this in order
KingOngendus 3 years ago
As Egyptian has same letter for both.And we shall find Sargon in his own inscriptions calls his queen 'The LADY ASH'.
His designation as 'of the line of the PRABHU' clearly defines 'as of the line of the PHARAOHS'. PRABHU the Sanskrit word here means 'ruler,master,lord'and it is in series with prefixed title 'PRA'
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Manasyu's father Pra-Vira identified as Sargon,here bears the title of Vira corresponding to his Pir title in old 'Isin' Sumerian king list,whilst Pra,in series with the longer form PRABHU, now appear to be equivalent of the Egyptian Paraa or Pharaoh.His mother name if Acchura Seni also confirm Manasyu's identity with Manis-Tusu.Her Indian name substantially equates as we shall see with Meopotamian name for Sargon's queen as Lady ASH-NAR also read ASH-LAL,l and r free interchangeable.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
'Manasyu' by wife Su-vira,beget three sons Shakta,Samhana and Vagma,all heros and mighty chrioteers.Here fortunately preserved to us in the Indian epic,the concentrated tradition of the Aryan king Manasyu as Pharaoh of Gopta(Egypt),all in nutshell.His geneology fully authenticated back to his grand father PURU II who is Puru-Gin of the Sumerian Isin lists and his Egyptian inscriptions and URU-TA GINA,in his Mesopotamian mouments.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
One of the Indian records of this king Manasyu and his ancestry states according to the reading.
'Puru' has by his wofe 'Pausti',three sons,Pra-Vira,Ishwara and Rudreswara,all of whom were mighty Charioteers.Amongst them Pra-Vira had by his wife 'Acchura Seni'a son named 'Manasyu'of the line of Prabho(Pharaoh)the royal eye of the Gopta(kopt or Egypt) and four ends of the earth.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
And 'Sargon' in Puru version is called Pra-vera or 'foremost hero',in which Vira corresponds to his sumerian title of Pir,V being very late invented letter.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
In the solar main line lists in which he is 38thh king(one can verify).
The Solar lists being the the most complete and undisturbed chronological order.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
The name of this Aryan king under the form of Manasyu is formed the Lunar version of the Indo-Aryan king and corrosponding the Solar form of his name as MANJAS OR ASA MANJA.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
You just flipping here and there,not refuting intellectually that Petrie or Waddell are fools!!Is it possible for you.
No nonsense talks.I continue this again,I can prove and give details to prove the antiquity of Vedic culture.Dont talk rubbish which you dont know like that of Solar dynasty kings.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
"I cannot say in racial sense as Aryan is race but I can say Aryans are the people who founded the spirtuality based superior culture,native and unique to India,living atleast 10000 years in India"
Aryan is not a race or a people, sorry to burst your fantasy but 42 you must think father christmas is real as well hahahaha
KingOngendus 3 years ago
I cannot say in racial sense as Aryan is race but I can say Aryans are the people who founded the spirtuality based superior culture,native and unique to India,living atleast 10000 years in India,but those people lived around them in those time very much differed in many aspects and very little cultured,later they made them as cultured people by founding civilizations.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
First,ignorance is the root cause of foolishness.I can enlighten you people with accurate details of experts and modern discoveries which anybody can verify themselves.If anything wrong there,Iam ready to accept.Iam also telling the truth cannot be changed or covered by lies..See most of the westerners(but many know sincerely)because of ego just keeping silent.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
"I can write,the study of Petrie Flinders in 1900,the first Egyptiologist to open many ancient Egyptian graves for the first time"
I'm interested in the people who opened the graves (grave robbers) I'm interested in the black africans who were in the graves
KingOngendus 3 years ago
Saraswathiputra
You can rant all you want but you can't change the truth Egypt was the result of black africans
now answer my questions or you have no case
KingOngendus 3 years ago
He studied elaborately the cranial structures of all predynasty Mummies,it is most authentic conclusion from this talented and dedicated expert.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
I can write,the study of Petrie Flinders in 1900,the first Egyptiologist to open many ancient Egyptian graves for the first time.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
For ignorant people all are fantasy only including the truth.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
"Read "Egyptian Civilization Its Sumerian Origin and Real ChronologyBy L. a. Waddell"
what is the haplogroup of the Sumerian???
do you think Aryan is a race????
without the answers to these questions you have no case sorry dude
KingOngendus 3 years ago
Read "Egyptian Civilization Its Sumerian Origin and Real Chronology
By L. a. Waddell
Published by Kessinger Publishing, 2003
ISBN 0766142736, 9780766142732
292 pages.
He has the unique advantage of directly going there even in 1930s where lot of undestroyed sources were there.All aptly demostrated by actual photos and explanations.He had advantage Greek,Latin, well versed in Sanskrit besides very few who actually know to read Egyptian hieroglyphs and Sumerian pictograms.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Dude Aryan is not a race so without people you have no case making the "early Aryan king list" a fantasy
KingOngendus 3 years ago
So you people dont know the details of early Aryan king list existing in India.Pathetic!!The are well maintained text of SuryaVamsa Kings are there in Sanskrit.Read RaghuVamsa(Kings of Solar dynasty).Again,these king list well maintained before 2300 years also as per the Greek sources.Ignorance is the root cause of foolishness.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
"Wait,I give expert name and book name"
Better than Professor A. J. Boyce, University Reader in Human Population Oxford University
I don't think so, so don't bother hahahaha
KingOngendus 3 years ago
dude do you think Aryan is a race????
KingOngendus 3 years ago
Wait,I give expert name and book name, you can also study and satisfy yourself.Each word here is not mine dear,but of well versed expert who mastered in Sanskrit and very few who elaborately studied and know to read Egyptian hieroglyphs and Sumerian pictgrams.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
"In summary, various kinds of data and the evolutionary approach indicate that the Nile Valley populations had greater ties with other African populations in the early ancient period. Early Nile Valley populations were primarily coextensive with indigenous African populations. Linguistic and archaeological data provide key supporting evidence for a primarily African origin" Professor A. J. Boyce, University Reader in Human Population Oxford University (tehuti)
KingOngendus 3 years ago
Nice speech
but no source you started off badly by mentioning "early Aryan king lists of Sanskrit texts"
Aryan is not a race, I should know I'm what they should have looked like hahahahahaha
KingOngendus 3 years ago
written on his own inscriptions by the self-same Sumerian pictograhic signs as in the sumerian king lists and in his own inscriptions as Sumerian Emperor in Mesopotamia.
Let us examine the detailed proofs of these identtities of Menes or Manj and his predynastic ancesstors in Egypt with thoe of Manis and his immediate imperial ancesstors In their contemporary inscription in Mesopotamia and in the Indian epic records of the early Aryan kings.
MENES OR MANIS-TUSU OR MANASYU,The Pharoah of Gopta.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
and that the names and order from Sargon's son Manis onwards were identical with those of Menes dynasty of Pharaohs on their own Egyptian monuments.Has his nameMenes or Manj in his Egyptan inscriptians usually bears the title of Manj-the warrior and in the Sumerian king lists and his own inscriptions in Mesopotamia,the son and successor of the Sargon-the -great styled Manis-the warrior.And last king of this dynasty bearing the same name in both sumerian and Egyptian inscriptions,
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
who carried Jews into exile and from whom they distinguih the former as 'Sargon-the great'.
On comparing early Aryan king lists of Sanskrit texts with those of the Sumerian in Mesopotamia,I observed that the later documents also recorded in the self-same chronological position the dynasty of king Gin or Guni(Sargon-the-great)bearing susbstantially the same names and titles as the Indian lists and in exactly in the same order,(continued)
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
The Indian epic king lists further record that he was the son and the successor of the mighty world emperor King Kuni or Sha Kuni or Sagara,whom I had fully identified with the Mesopotamian world emperor whose name is variously spelt Kin,Gin,Guni or Shar-Guni,a name which is arbitrarily semitized by the assyriologists into 'Sargon' in order to equate it with Hebrew name 'Sargon' of the much later notorious semitic Assyrian king of that in the eighth century BC,
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
In the later he bears the name of 'Asa Manja' or 'Manja,the shooter' in the Splar version of the Indian Epic lists and Manasyu or Manas-the uniter in the lunar version.
And great Indian epic Mahabharata spplementing Purana Chronicle account describes him as Manasyu of the line of Prabhu(Paraas or Pharaoh)the royal eye of Gopta(Kopt or Egypt) and four ends of the earth.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
The first clue to these discoveries were given by my observation that Menes(as he called by Greeks) or Manj(as he was called in his own Egyptian inscriptions)appears in due chronological position along with his dynasty in the official king list of the early Aryans from the first king onwards in Indian epic Chronicles,the Puranas.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
the manner in which I was led to discover the truly historical character of Menes,his lost epoch making history and pre history,his genealogy continuously back through seven centuries to the first Sumerian Aryan king who was the traditional founder of Civilization and builder of the first city,his date and the fact that he was at one and same time Sumerian Emperor in Mesopotmia and first dynastic king or Pharaoh in Egypt as a crown colony of his world empire could be well understood from below.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
The traditional founder of first dynasty of Egypt,although regularly cited in the native Egyptian king lists from the old chronology of Sety I downwards to Manetho as the founder of fist dynasty in Egypt has been shadowy and so little known not withstanding his discovey of his tomb with contemporary onscriptions by
Sir Flinders Petrie in the royal cemeteries at Abydos in 1900,
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Actually,it is now proved that Sumerians were founders of Egyptian civilization,in turn Sumerians were ancient Vedic people from India.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Ancient Egyptian ruling class is not African but Egypt predoninantly populated by blacks.Again,Egyptian ruling class were Vedic people from ancient India who also founders of Sumerian culture.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
tandrus7
You're delusional the Ancient Egyptians were black africans besides the term caucasoid was discredited in 2007 so your story has no basis you might have well started it with "Once upon a time" hahahahaha
KingOngendus 3 years ago
Our results suggest that the Gurna population has conserved the trace of an ancestral genetic structure from an ancestral East African population, characterized by a high M1 haplogroup frequency. The current structure of the Egyptian population may be the result of further influence of neighbouring populations on this ancestral population"
Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Diversity in a Sedentary Population from Egypt
A. Stevanovitch 1,**, A. Gilles 2 , E. Bouzaid 1 , R. Kefi 1 , F. Paris
KingOngendus 3 years ago
"sorry, it doesn't. Want me to send you an Mtdna report?"
"The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) diversity of 58 individuals from Upper Egypt, more than half (34 individuals) from Gurna, whose population has an ancient cultural history, were studied by sequencing the control-region and screening diagnostic RFLP markers. This sedentary population presented similarities to the Ethiopian population by the L1 and L2 macrohaplogroup frequency (20.6%)
KingOngendus 3 years ago
mrallcock
You're delusional the Ancient Egyptians were black africans the genetics prove it
KingOngendus 3 years ago
sorry, it doesn't. Want me to send you an Mtdna report?
123duffbeerrules 3 years ago
You see the caucasoid was light skin with black, brown or red hair (mummies). This was before the nubians took over for awhile. It would be like the USA if in 80 years the blacks overpopulated and they became the majority, they would bury (not literally) the white history. That in 500 years it could be taught the blacks founded and ruled the USA. It is very similar in Egypt. The nubians were slaves of the Egytians. The semites were white to bronze in complextion. King Tuts cane and sandals.
tandrus7 3 years ago
bxlunar- did you know that chimpanzees consistently perform better on standardized tests than afroamericans? now how you gonna convince anyone that a bunch of spear carrying primitives of low intelligence can construct a civilization? for the negro the opposable thumb only serves to pick his fleas. how can you claim to know anything about your heritage when you do not even know who your father is
mrallcock 3 years ago
bxlunar- they are white. as far as surviving in various climates- face it- it happens- we have clothing hats etc to protect us from the sun, cold etcetera- of course clothing is a recent concept to negroes as anyone who reads national geographic knows. by the way- GOD is WHITE too- word to your nappy headed trick turning mama
mrallcock 3 years ago
you are sick and demented. the language of KMT is known and accepted by various PHDs as being AFRICAN. oh btw, that nappy hair shows who the original ppl. were. nappy hair and dark skin=protection from the sun. hairy,white and blue eyes=NEANDERTHAL CAVE DWELLER. who had to wear a lot of clothing in AFRICA because it wasn't NATURAL for him to be there.GOD IS NOT WHITE SINCE BLACKS WERE THE FIRST PEOPLE ON THE PLANET!!!check your DNA and it will tell you. are you 12? or just sssssstupid?
bxlunar 3 years ago
they look caucasian to me- i doubt negroes could build an advanced civilization with high technology- too busy lying stealing and eating fried chicken and smoking crack, pimping their hoes etc. the mediterraneans must have done this- good argument plaintruth, this really exposes the shoddy scholarship of envious ego deficient afro americans. of course we must credit the african slave labor too. word to your nappy headed mamas
mrallcock 3 years ago
well if they do look white to you, then, you are mentally unwell. who created the ills of society and forced it on us? who forced religions sans spirit on their slaves? that's YOUR culture. why don't you leave your cave and go read a book. if they were white, that would mean that whites started out in AFRICA.then that would mean that whites could survive in a climate that would no doubt kill them and, populate the rest of the human race. that's sad. ppl of color are the majority so how is that?
bxlunar 3 years ago