Conditionat means to fix n link the (subconscious) beavior of the animal or human with a automatic reaction, when it becomes a special input (not food).
hey thanks for explaining between the two because i was confused about the difference but thanks to you and your cute like rocky i finally understand what it means!!u rock!!
great video thanks so much, i've been having trouble understanding the difference between the 2. ^^ now i can write my paper thnx again and i love ur doggy! =p
I would suggest you don't use the terms, "positive" and "negative" because SO many people don't understand positive and negative reinforcement and punishment. Different wording from "rewarding positively or negatively" would help.
I know you're not talking about the terms, "reinforcement" or "punishment." But as it's all about conditioning, when I teach, I avoid the terms "positive" or "negative" as substitutes for "reinforcement" or "punishment."
Classical Conditioning about LEARNED responses, not innate responses. Innate responses are what we call "reflexes", which can be defined by the reflex arc. Usually with enough successful shaping, you can involve intermediate rft's, instead of a constant rft schedule. You described operant conditioning very good, but the classical conditioning explanation was quite poor. The can-opener is a much better way of explanation of describing a Neutral Stimulus (NS), Conditioned Stimulus (CS), and a CR.
Actually classical conditioning is for example, training your dog to respond to the snack (CS) to a neutral stimulus like a bell.
Targ270 5 months ago
My cat's name is Rocky, and I've also conditioned him too. :D
bijoukaiba 9 months ago
what an adorable puppy! :D
RadhaBlossom 10 months ago
You are training your dog with food.
Conditionat means to fix n link the (subconscious) beavior of the animal or human with a automatic reaction, when it becomes a special input (not food).
GreenDevilAngel 11 months ago
Hey guy. Conditioning means not that a living beeing whats food.
It means you can conditionat a thing that is normely absolutly not interesting for the animal n makes no respond n reaction to its behavior.
For sure it whants food!
Pavlovs show us that he could conditionate the dog to the bell.
GreenDevilAngel 11 months ago
DUDE YOu are a LIFESAVIOR..thank YOU...VERY MUCH.
djintence845 1 year ago
aww ur dogs so cute
and thank you this helped my differ both of the conditions!
m00035 1 year ago
It's not bribery then?!
Hasnt the dog got to offer the behaviour before he sees the reward?
CrueLoaf 1 year ago
Thank you for your experiment this has really helped me understand the difference.
royleesbabygirl 1 year ago
when a dog knows how to "sit" from standing, it doesnt mean he knows how to "sit" when he lays down.
These 2 "sits" are 2 different commands, because of the totaly different muscle moves that have to happen in order to complete the move.
UltiMogr 1 year ago
hey thanks for explaining between the two because i was confused about the difference but thanks to you and your cute like rocky i finally understand what it means!!u rock!!
babygal47 1 year ago
great video thanks so much, i've been having trouble understanding the difference between the 2. ^^ now i can write my paper thnx again and i love ur doggy! =p
zombiekitty9 1 year ago
Rocky is a good sidekick. Great job!
njneopatriot 1 year ago
this dog is so so cute!
katywoo 2 years ago
This is great - fine job! Cute dog.
I would suggest you don't use the terms, "positive" and "negative" because SO many people don't understand positive and negative reinforcement and punishment. Different wording from "rewarding positively or negatively" would help.
I know you're not talking about the terms, "reinforcement" or "punishment." But as it's all about conditioning, when I teach, I avoid the terms "positive" or "negative" as substitutes for "reinforcement" or "punishment."
ProfessorAlice 2 years ago
This is a science. You don't call a beaker a glass bottle thingy because people might think it sounds nicer.
Robotoh 2 years ago
your dog is magnifique
TheCherokeeboy 2 years ago
That was great, Im studying for my psych class test...thanks
pindelindadada 2 years ago
operant conditioning is behaviour led - not stimulus led. By offering him a treat it is stimulus led, not behaviour led.
BFem1985 2 years ago
awesome dog
n1ckz0r 3 years ago
great job explaining the two, I am in psychology class and this really helped, thanks! cute dog btw
Screengems1 3 years ago
Classical Conditioning about LEARNED responses, not innate responses. Innate responses are what we call "reflexes", which can be defined by the reflex arc. Usually with enough successful shaping, you can involve intermediate rft's, instead of a constant rft schedule. You described operant conditioning very good, but the classical conditioning explanation was quite poor. The can-opener is a much better way of explanation of describing a Neutral Stimulus (NS), Conditioned Stimulus (CS), and a CR.
FendersRule 3 years ago 6