Added: 3 years ago
From: mac15444
Views: 29,339
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Actually classical conditioning is for example, training your dog to respond to the snack (CS) to a neutral stimulus like a bell.

  • My cat's name is Rocky, and I've also conditioned him too. :D

  • what an adorable puppy! :D

  • You are training your dog with food.

    Conditionat means to fix n link the (subconscious) beavior of the animal or human with a automatic reaction, when it becomes a special input (not food).

  • Hey guy. Conditioning means not that a living beeing whats food.

    It means you can conditionat a thing that is normely absolutly not interesting for the animal n makes no respond n reaction to its behavior.

    For sure it whants food!

    Pavlovs show us that he could conditionate the dog to the bell.

  • DUDE YOu are a LIFESAVIOR..thank YOU...VERY MUCH.

  • aww ur dogs so cute

    and thank you this helped my differ both of the conditions!

  • It's not bribery then?!

    Hasnt the dog got to offer the behaviour before he sees the reward?

  • Thank you for your experiment this has really helped me understand the difference.

  • when a dog knows how to "sit" from standing, it doesnt mean he knows how to "sit" when he lays down.

    These 2 "sits" are 2 different commands, because of the totaly different muscle moves that have to happen in order to complete the move.

  • hey thanks for explaining between the two because i was confused about the difference but thanks to you and your cute like rocky i finally understand what it means!!u rock!!

  • great video thanks so much, i've been having trouble understanding the difference between the 2. ^^ now i can write my paper thnx again and i love ur doggy! =p

  • Rocky is a good sidekick. Great job!

  • this dog is so so cute!

  • This is great - fine job! Cute dog.

    I would suggest you don't use the terms, "positive" and "negative" because SO many people don't understand positive and negative reinforcement and punishment. Different wording from "rewarding positively or negatively" would help.

    I know you're not talking about the terms, "reinforcement" or "punishment." But as it's all about conditioning, when I teach, I avoid the terms "positive" or "negative" as substitutes for "reinforcement" or "punishment."

  • This is a science. You don't call a beaker a glass bottle thingy because people might think it sounds nicer.

  • your dog is magnifique

  • That was great, Im studying for my psych class test...thanks

  • operant conditioning is behaviour led - not stimulus led. By offering him a treat it is stimulus led, not behaviour led.

  • awesome dog

  • great job explaining the two, I am in psychology class and this really helped, thanks!  cute dog btw

  • Classical Conditioning about LEARNED responses, not innate responses. Innate responses are what we call "reflexes", which can be defined by the reflex arc. Usually with enough successful shaping, you can involve intermediate rft's, instead of a constant rft schedule. You described operant conditioning very good, but the classical conditioning explanation was quite poor. The can-opener is a much better way of explanation of describing a Neutral Stimulus (NS), Conditioned Stimulus (CS), and a CR.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more