1:45 "do not question my scientific credentials" - okay as soon as I hear that I know that I am not talking to a scientist as a scientist relies on evidence and not credentials...
Abraham Lincoln was not a founding father! The discussion between these two individuals proves the point that Dawkins made as per O'Reilly: you're idiots!
Dr. Chopra, I thought you are a quiet different one. Cannot believe you gang up with Bill. and yet you are lecturing others about spirituality? No. you are not that advanced yet.
There is a big difference though between religious fundamentalists whose beliefs have negative effects on humanity than someone who is just spiritual like deepak chopra - there is a big difference between people following churches' authority and people who simply have their own beliefs that have no scientific proof. That's why it's called BELIEF. Often religious people use "God" as a tool to express their bigotry and intolerance without taking any responsibility. Chopra is nothing like that.
Bill O'Reilly is an obnoxious, overbearing, self promoting asshole. I've always seen Dawkins behaving with more restraint and patience than most and is certainly more credible than Chopra or O'Reilly. If someone disagrees with O'Reilly, he just waves his hand and talks louder.
watch bill when he is asking the questions, for example 3:45 he asks deepak if he believes in a god which intervenes, all the while his head is nodding because hes wanting deepak to say yes. and vice verca. o'reilly is a muppet, and yeah.... ill admit it........ if i had a shotgun id point blank him between the eyes.
Chopra isn't an idiot, he is just a clever scam artist who makes money off of the gullible. However, Oreilly is a total idiot. Chopra just has to stoop down to Oreilly's level just to talk to him. At least Chopra made an apology for defaming Dawkins. This Oreilly is a bastard for calling Dawkins a bigot.
I'm so tired of people like this asserting that they know things they can't possibly know and saying things are true when they simply aren't. Complete waist of time
How do you make every single word leaving your mouth sound so incredibly dumb? I never thought words like "a" or "the" can be so agonisingly annoying and stupid, but in the right context (O'reiley) they can be.
Holy SHIT Deepak you really proved yourself to be the biggest IDIOT since Bill started up on Fox news. You really are the fraud that Richard proved you to be.
America was founded on secular values, explicitly keeping religion separate from the state which is why Dawkins is correct when he says "well that's not true" when O'Reilly claims that America "was based on [judeo-christian philosophy]". It's funny that Dawkins didn't even make a big deal out of it, but O'Reilly brings it up again, suggesting that he's wrong because the American judicial system was based on the 10 Commandments (what?!) and Abraham Lincoln (the 16th President?!) read the bible.
The American judicial system was built upon the ten commandments? So it's illegal to commit adultery in America then? Or to make graven images? Or to belong to any religion other than Christianity? Or to open up shops/work on a Sunday? Or to talk back to your parents? Or to say "Oh my God"? Or gossip about your neighbour? Or covet his or her ox? Or is he just thinking of the fact that it's illegal to kill and to steal in America as it is in every country, Christian or otherwise.
That was like the saddest display of ignorance I've seen in quite a while, if these guys haven't learned to think by their age I think it's time to hang up the teleprompter and just hit the bathhouse for their golden years.
Richard Dawkins ist Francesco Schettino des Wissenschaftsbetriebs, der das Schiff der exakten Naturwissenschaften in die Havarie der atheistischen Halbwissenschaften zusteuert. Mit seinem waghalsigen Manöver eines Hasardeurs wird er die unzähligen Passanten der "Costa Scienza" in die unmoralische Vernunftlosigkeit kentern.
This video makes me angry: 1) Because Richard is clearly correct, and they're calling him a bigot, utterly hypocritically. And 2) Why has Fox not been persecuted for spreading lies among the media.
Ha, 1:28. Caption: "Richard Dawkins, Atheist". What low life scum they are at Fox. What about *Professor Richard Dawkins, scientist, author, tireless populariser of science and crusader for critical thinking and honest inquiry?! And BO even had the gall to call him dishonest what a cvnt!
Even Deepak got "M.D." acknowledged, even though it has nothing to do with becoming rich through selling imaginary "world views" to the gullible, poorly educated and superstitious.
Chopra may be a clown (and I will continue saying he's a clown despite having a shred of respect for him since he apologized for what he said in this video with O'Reilly), but O'Reilly is just a plain asshole that couldn't kick a high school students ass in a debate on atheism vs. theism, much less Dawkins'. And saying Dawkins' is a dishonest person without even saying why is just plain wrong. This asshole has been given license to villainize people on a public show without consequences. o.O
Ahahaaaaa... Do these two imbecils REALLY think they've had kicked anyone's butt anytime in any question of any topic of logic - Dawkins in particular!!!??? correction: imbecils - I meant "full blown idiots"
Bill O'Reilly says: "He (Dawkins) really believes that we are idiots". Dawkins is a gentleman when he uses the word "believes") - but I KNOW you're idiots.
That apology response of Chopra is so lame. Disgusting man.
The fact that Bill always shouts and yells at the ones who don`t agree with him, doesn`t make him come off as kicking their asses, it makes him come off as the closeminded, ignorant, short fused and abrasive jackass he really is.
Chopra's a moron. Creating intelligent sentinent life would be almost proof that "Intelligent Design" is possible... No wonder he says you need to ignore logic and go with a gut feeling/guess/what makes me feel warm inside.
You know, when someone is trying to debate for his opinion and they say things like "I kicked his butt" they just lose all credibility in my eyes. I stopped watching at that point.
The fact that Bill O'Reilly thinks he kicked Dawkins' ass is delusional in the extreme. Shouting over someone with the same ill-educated sound-bytes rather than expressing an original thought is not 'kicking ass'. The "man" has delusions of mediocrity.
And as to, "it's more emotion with them". Wow! Pot, meet kettle. Adherence to religion is almost always about emotion ahead of intellect.
Chopra is a modern day snake oil salesman. And O'Reilly is an idiot. Neither make good points at all. What a joke. Of course, the average Fox viewer will watch this and go "Ya, Ya....makes good sense". And then go back to eating their bag of cheesies while waiting for reruns of The Bachelor. Pathetic.
Pathetic...absolutely pathetic...I swear, I couldnt stand O'Reilly and didnt like Deepak Chopra, before but now I cant stand both of em... Theyre just a bunch of dimwits...the way Chopra conformed to O'Reilly just to get his support?? a pathetic attempt..I honestly feel that they ARE idiots...not all creationists are...but these two , hell yeah...
The universe does not comform to earths "laws of nature" you dumb ass, look up quantum physics. You are taling about a macroobject world. Man I am not smart but the more you read you realize how stupid they are
@art0neable Seems like you're the dumbass. First there no such thing as "earths laws of nature" because the laws of nature apply to the whole universe. The physical constants are the same here on earth as they are billions of light years away in space.
This amount of primitive idiocy is truly shocking, the realization that not only are there individuals such as these two who note only have these views but are able to spread their influence on people who may not be able to withstand this bombardment of nonsense, truly hurts. I can only hope that long after I am gone, humanity and society will continue to evolve until it gets to a point that a video like this, with individuals such as these would be impossible.... watching this truly hurts...
Chopra is an agnostic-desist. I became interested in his work when i discovered his atheism and criticism of contemporary religious traditions. shortly into his book "The Third Jesus" i realized his particular brand of apologetics and have dismissed him since. I appreciate his attempts to be an out-of-the-box thinker in championing spirituality without religion, but he tried to 'have the cake and eat it too.' He is an atheist in denial.
Bill O'Reilly is an ignorant, one man spin committee.
Bill o'reily said he hopes there is a god. I for one looking at him from a perspective, do not see a god fearing man, I do not se a humble and generous man. I wouldn't definatly lke to listen, if there where a god, and Bill was confroted with him..
NO scientist will refute that science has no absolute answer for all "whys"! If it did there would be no science. Science comes to theories, based off ideas, that become hypothesis, that are then tested over and over again by MANY different unbiased scientist. Only then do they come to a conclusion of a scientific theory. So no scientist will ever say ANYTHING has 100% certainty. Science has questions that may never be answered. Religion has answers that may never be questioned.
What these idiots miss is that something religious is as important as the person that says it. Pope's words are most important than a bishop's. But scientific facts are not like that - a person's credentials dont matter. Relativity was discovered by a patent office worker. Its the evidence that counts.
5:08 minutes i will never get back. they didnt say anything of value and they didnt care enough to backup their claims.... in what part of the world is this regarded as news?? srsly....
@atheistrocker100 i'm so confused; does your name mean you ARE an atheist or does it mean you rock (as in beat) atheist? Either way, you're an idiot (to which i will not clarify because you did not clarify your own views on dawkins). If you'd expound on why Dawkins sucks, I'd be glad to give you evidence as to why you're an idiot.
@atheistrocker100 You lost respect for him for refusing to give a modicum of credibility to pseudo-philosopher by letting people believe there's an actual debate to be had there? WLC brings nothing new to the table, every one of his arguments have been discredited decades ago. I'd lose respect for him if he did engage in a serious debate with that moron WLC.
@atheistrocker100 Craig is no one, his claim to fame is not getting a response from Dawkins to a debate and most of his arguments are meaningless rambles its worth searching for "William Lane Craig, True Colors" for a good laugh.
@Rockster969 See this is why i don;t have much respect for you atheists. You comment on how tolerant and morally perfect you all are, when actually atheists are probably the most intolerant of all, (not *all* atheists, but the majority) Iv met WLC; he did a talk at my old college. Whether you disagree with him or not on his world view is irrelevant. Hes very nice man who wouldn't hurt a fly. When i hear you all saying hes an "idiot, wanker etc" i instantly know, you're just dumb assholes
@atheistrocker100 Are you serious? Dawkins is the opposite of a coward. He must get hate mail every day, yet he continues to be outspoken in his books and in countless interviews and shows. He has had one on one debates with many creationists. To call him a coward is the most untruthful statement imaginable. I imagine he is sick to the back teeth of debating creationists, and let's be honest - Dawkins is not a theological philosopher- such an debate would not be progressive.
@Yokel47 " yet he continues to be outspoken in his books" Yes, i'm sure its so hard for him, making all the millions of dollars he does, hes not courageous, hes just clever enough to make idiots like you pay money to hear him regurgitate old 18th century atheist arguments, simply by adding more aggression and anti-religious controversy.
"debating creationists" WLC is NOT a creationist.
"the most untruthful statement imaginable" Tell that to his Oxford peers who seem to agree with me.
@atheistrocker100 Don't hate on him just because he's a successuful author as well as a world renowned biologist. 18th century arguments? Please tell me what the significance of that is? how are these arguments 18th century? WLC may not be a creationist. but he believes god oversaw evolution. Reconciling evolution with a benevolent God is stupid because the whole Darwinian process of natural selection is brutal and has no morality. WLC also thinks ID is a 'viable alternative'
@atheistrocker100 He is not a coward! He just deems it a total waste of time. I wouldn't debate with an Islamic fundamentalist. Why? Because no matter what you say; they have an answer for everything. Debates are for open minded people.
Omnipotence and omniscience? The two cannot coincide. Omnipotence on its own is hard to reconcile. Can God make a rock so heavy he cannot lift it? These are just words, when taken literally, reveal the true ignorance of the subject. On one hand we are told God is unknowable and mysterious and beyond human comprehension but in the same breath the believer says "I know god and I know his intent and he speaks to me." Seriously??
I bet when life can be produced in labs by scientists they'll just switch it up and say "See! That proves that there MUST be a creator in order to create life." instead of taking in the fact that life can be made from natural materials. =____=
Bill O' Reilly is a struggling to extract point from deepak chopra in favour of christain god but deepak chopra explains about hindu spiritual ideaology of god. wat a joke on this show and Bill O' Reilly i pity for ur state
Concousness and God are the same thing. God created the universe by thinking the universe into existence and as a result, the universe responds to thought. Read the book the Secret!
@jahlstrand1995 He thinks he is, and so does Fox News. I don't think he can tell his head from his ass because shit comes out both ends....lol. I live in Ohio, and I don't know much either....I think we are in the same boat
deepak chopra is a complete and utter contradiction in himself,.. he talks the talk but doesn't walk the walk ,.. he is full of ego and greed as well as judgemental and dismissive of others beliefs,.. the prrof of a man is in his actions,.. deepak took good knowledge and prostituted it for money and fame, he took a great a gift of understanding then twisted it to make a profit and excuse his own ego while looking down his nose at others. that is to say he deserves nothing in way of honor.
anyone else amazed that Billo invited a foreign brown person with an accent and a funny sounding name on his show? it's surprising to me, because if Chopra was wearing the wrong kind of clothing, Billo and all the other FauxBots would think he was a terrorist.
@Cuddlebunzzzz i am not at all surprised, it is an old ploy,.. put a sell out from a group on stage and play nice,.. i say sell out for deepak not on racial terms but on spiritual ones,..fox is a propaganda machine ,.. so in helping them spread hate and lies deepak in effect took his reputation and sold it to those spreading discord for an appearance fee knowing full well what they do and how they do it. i can expect that from the regular joe but held up by so many as a spiritual man sickens me.
I struggled to the end of this video. What a fucking crock of shit. These two are just spouting utter nonsense. Dawkins has more credibility in his left nipple than these two fuckwits put together. They are a pair of lying cunts. Chopra KNOWS he is bullshitting. He can hardly keep a straight face.
They must find it difficult: Those who have taken authority as the truth rather than truth as the authority.
OneParticleCharged 6 hours ago
O'Reilly: Stupid and proud.
wallneville 2 days ago
1:45 "do not question my scientific credentials" - okay as soon as I hear that I know that I am not talking to a scientist as a scientist relies on evidence and not credentials...
jagara1 2 days ago
1:34 No Bill he does not believe you are idiots he KNOWS you are idiots!
jagara1 2 days ago
lol. Kicked his butt. Oh Bill...you live in a fantasy world.
TheSlevinCalevra 2 days ago
Can't even watch this whole video. These guys are idiots
IamToyminator 3 days ago
'youtube.com/watch?v=zJ4jYvbxTCk&feature=related'
IamToyminator 3 days ago
Hahahah! Those are a couple of idiots.
And what the heck is Deepak up to, claiming Stephen Hawking as his collaborator? What a liar the guy is!
Orsbore 3 days ago
bill o reilly kicked his butt?
loooooooooooooooololololololol
KeithTHORNZ 3 days ago
what kind of news is this??? you get someone onto your program to approve your world view?
TheGatesOfFire 4 days ago
Abraham Lincoln was not a founding father! The discussion between these two individuals proves the point that Dawkins made as per O'Reilly: you're idiots!
elchino37 4 days ago
sad to see a beliver moking of "kicking asses"!!!
heavyes 4 days ago
He's not the only one who thinks your idiots. Bill O'Reilly= Brianwashed Moron
MrCrimboSlice 6 days ago
Go Deepak!!!, getting back at Dawkins for dissing you in "Enemies of Reason"
SudanCarib 6 days ago
Chopra, dawkins, and o'reily are all retarded pompous assholes.
lovingsingleton 1 week ago
LOL. Meteorite. He doesn't know wtf he is talking about.
ThaGMan51 1 week ago 2
Bill O'Reilly kicking Dawkins' butt. Yeah. I believe that. Queue "you can't explain the tides" clip.
Arkomonicus 1 week ago
I hate Chopra. So glad to see this clip that proves what I already thought from other clips I've seen of Chopra: Total douchebag.
rybpo7 1 week ago
i actually think this whole world would be a better place if Bill Orielly was stoned to death
mike65730 1 week ago 2
Dr. Chopra, I thought you are a quiet different one. Cannot believe you gang up with Bill. and yet you are lecturing others about spirituality? No. you are not that advanced yet.
mmmm79099 1 week ago
OReily is an insecure knob!
jameskparos 1 week ago
Fox News is the corrupt bullshit America needs to get rid of. GO ANONYMOUS!
Ruberick28 1 week ago
Bill O Reilly.. what a total twat...
Bubinga5 1 week ago
There is a big difference though between religious fundamentalists whose beliefs have negative effects on humanity than someone who is just spiritual like deepak chopra - there is a big difference between people following churches' authority and people who simply have their own beliefs that have no scientific proof. That's why it's called BELIEF. Often religious people use "God" as a tool to express their bigotry and intolerance without taking any responsibility. Chopra is nothing like that.
Mediumchild 1 week ago
Bill O'Reilly is an obnoxious, overbearing, self promoting asshole. I've always seen Dawkins behaving with more restraint and patience than most and is certainly more credible than Chopra or O'Reilly. If someone disagrees with O'Reilly, he just waves his hand and talks louder.
Paladin62 1 week ago 7
watch bill when he is asking the questions, for example 3:45 he asks deepak if he believes in a god which intervenes, all the while his head is nodding because hes wanting deepak to say yes. and vice verca. o'reilly is a muppet, and yeah.... ill admit it........ if i had a shotgun id point blank him between the eyes.
pickledlovesnovas 1 week ago
Wow two of the biggest idiots on the face of the planet on one stage?I love television!
anuragborn2rock 1 week ago
Chopra isn't an idiot, he is just a clever scam artist who makes money off of the gullible. However, Oreilly is a total idiot. Chopra just has to stoop down to Oreilly's level just to talk to him. At least Chopra made an apology for defaming Dawkins. This Oreilly is a bastard for calling Dawkins a bigot.
sh00008 1 week ago
I am not sure about intelligent design, however O'Reilly is strong evidence of unintelligent design!
TheBrucehump 1 week ago
"thats just assurd" open your mouth when you spew tripe
STEZZA83 1 week ago
I'm so tired of people like this asserting that they know things they can't possibly know and saying things are true when they simply aren't. Complete waist of time
justinillusion 1 week ago
Faith is the Gold licence to stop thinking.
ThePositiveAussie 1 week ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Fucking thick pair of cunts!!!
willo996 1 week ago
Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams were all against Christianity and had no respect for religion.
ProletarianTakeover 1 week ago
you guys are idiots...
xtremeconny 1 week ago
hehe
danielfact 2 weeks ago
Mr O'Reilly, Richard Dawkins does not call you an idiot, it's self-evident.
Celiamel 2 weeks ago 9
That was the worst 5 minutes of my life.
2 complete morons vomiting nonsense. How sad.
northoforacle 2 weeks ago
I love Deepak, have no use for O'Reilly, and greatly respect Richard Dawkins. I also like reason and sanity, but I won't hold that against Deepak.
74SuperCool 2 weeks ago
O'reilly actualy thinks he kicked Dawkins butt? (His words) WoW mad as a box of frogs.
phinch1234 2 weeks ago
It still comes down to...Just because one believes, no matter what his credentials, doesnt make it true
deislfume 2 weeks ago
How do you make every single word leaving your mouth sound so incredibly dumb? I never thought words like "a" or "the" can be so agonisingly annoying and stupid, but in the right context (O'reiley) they can be.
TheOneAndOnlyNerd1 2 weeks ago
Deepak is such a bullshit artist. And of course Bills moronic lack of thinking knows no bounds.
herringla 2 weeks ago 2
Holy SHIT Deepak you really proved yourself to be the biggest IDIOT since Bill started up on Fox news. You really are the fraud that Richard proved you to be.
Andrewlohbihler 2 weeks ago
anyone who peddles shit like chopra and oreilly scare the hell out of me
Uhavebeenfrimponged 2 weeks ago
Total nonsense. wow, 21st century and we still have this ...
GIndep 2 weeks ago
that vid is wrong on so many levels...
Lucassandro25 2 weeks ago
The only good thing about this video is the number of dislikes.
sonicsoxxxx 2 weeks ago 2
What is the difference between o'reilly and god ??? god doesnt think he is a self opinoniated talk show host ......
bowpilot55 2 weeks ago
America was founded on secular values, explicitly keeping religion separate from the state which is why Dawkins is correct when he says "well that's not true" when O'Reilly claims that America "was based on [judeo-christian philosophy]". It's funny that Dawkins didn't even make a big deal out of it, but O'Reilly brings it up again, suggesting that he's wrong because the American judicial system was based on the 10 Commandments (what?!) and Abraham Lincoln (the 16th President?!) read the bible.
lamplighteyes 2 weeks ago
@lamplighteyes Actually America founded on Christian values with secular principles.
atheistrocker100 2 weeks ago
The American judicial system was built upon the ten commandments? So it's illegal to commit adultery in America then? Or to make graven images? Or to belong to any religion other than Christianity? Or to open up shops/work on a Sunday? Or to talk back to your parents? Or to say "Oh my God"? Or gossip about your neighbour? Or covet his or her ox? Or is he just thinking of the fact that it's illegal to kill and to steal in America as it is in every country, Christian or otherwise.
lamplighteyes 2 weeks ago 2
That was like the saddest display of ignorance I've seen in quite a while, if these guys haven't learned to think by their age I think it's time to hang up the teleprompter and just hit the bathhouse for their golden years.
kyebean 2 weeks ago
The Fuck ? I'm ashamed being an Indian with people like you Deepak,
Fuck you ! Richard Dawkins FTW !
forgottenmemories63 2 weeks ago
@forgottenmemories63 Don't worry, my friend. No thinking man believes that Dr. Chopra is representative of all people of Indian ethnicity.
Halo3ForumEurope 2 weeks ago
Disgusting. Two idiots talking together. Millions watch. I seriously lose hope when I see people like this.
incaayoub 2 weeks ago 2
@incaayoub Yup
robertmck12 2 weeks ago
Here we have one famous idiot interviewing one famous charlatan!
Both are good at making money and fooling the masses.
navsky2011 2 weeks ago
god damn these ignorant people... seriously, I bet he is pissed about the guys in his corner.
idamonutube 2 weeks ago
Disgusting.
nefaristo 2 weeks ago
What a pair of jack asses. But like i always say, dont get mad guys, this kind of stupidity only works against them.
jrev37 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Richard Dawkins ist Francesco Schettino des Wissenschaftsbetriebs, der das Schiff der exakten Naturwissenschaften in die Havarie der atheistischen Halbwissenschaften zusteuert. Mit seinem waghalsigen Manöver eines Hasardeurs wird er die unzähligen Passanten der "Costa Scienza" in die unmoralische Vernunftlosigkeit kentern.
JesusChristusSoter 2 weeks ago
Abraham Lincoln read the bible everyday in the 1860's. That's all the proof that I need. LOL
BUDBASEBALLFAN 3 weeks ago
@BUDBASEBALLFAN Uhm.. Lincoln was familiar with the bible, but never joined a church. He was even "accused" of beeing an atheist.
TheJo4an 2 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Richard Dawkins dishonest guy coming from you bill dont make me laugh pair of morons
scotlandthebrave789 3 weeks ago
This video makes me angry: 1) Because Richard is clearly correct, and they're calling him a bigot, utterly hypocritically. And 2) Why has Fox not been persecuted for spreading lies among the media.
LilSimpleAli 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ha, 1:28. Caption: "Richard Dawkins, Atheist". What low life scum they are at Fox. What about *Professor Richard Dawkins, scientist, author, tireless populariser of science and crusader for critical thinking and honest inquiry?! And BO even had the gall to call him dishonest what a cvnt!
Even Deepak got "M.D." acknowledged, even though it has nothing to do with becoming rich through selling imaginary "world views" to the gullible, poorly educated and superstitious.
Disgraceful!
kelco93 3 weeks ago 3
Comment removed
kelco93 3 weeks ago
When do they start masturbating each other because it feels like it's leading to this...
Robocoolabora 3 weeks ago 5
Chopra may be a clown (and I will continue saying he's a clown despite having a shred of respect for him since he apologized for what he said in this video with O'Reilly), but O'Reilly is just a plain asshole that couldn't kick a high school students ass in a debate on atheism vs. theism, much less Dawkins'. And saying Dawkins' is a dishonest person without even saying why is just plain wrong. This asshole has been given license to villainize people on a public show without consequences. o.O
tjstevens74 3 weeks ago 16
He got Sweden's flag up there...85% atheism, just saying:P
kimdron256 3 weeks ago 3
I don't care if Dawikins may be little aggressive, we all know how many assholes he have to talked to all his life. he can't be generous always.
codenamerishi 3 weeks ago
If you combined them into one, you would still have a halfwit.
brewerbrian420 3 weeks ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Ahahaaaaa... Do these two imbecils REALLY think they've had kicked anyone's butt anytime in any question of any topic of logic - Dawkins in particular!!!??? correction: imbecils - I meant "full blown idiots"
Bill O'Reilly says: "He (Dawkins) really believes that we are idiots". Dawkins is a gentleman when he uses the word "believes") - but I KNOW you're idiots.
That apology response of Chopra is so lame. Disgusting man.
ExtrackterYT 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
ExtrackterYT 3 weeks ago
The fact that Bill always shouts and yells at the ones who don`t agree with him, doesn`t make him come off as kicking their asses, it makes him come off as the closeminded, ignorant, short fused and abrasive jackass he really is.
TheAtheistviking 3 weeks ago 6
You are idiots.
val2go19 3 weeks ago
Bill O'reilly has never kicked anyone's butt. Deepak and Bill are complete idiots.
teenprenuer 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos 41
Chopra's a moron. Creating intelligent sentinent life would be almost proof that "Intelligent Design" is possible... No wonder he says you need to ignore logic and go with a gut feeling/guess/what makes me feel warm inside.
Muscari 3 weeks ago
Bill O'Reilly's vocabulary is fit for explaining what god is to prescholars.
DC - "I believe is there is an active source that is omnipresent, omnipotent, omniscient and..."
BO'R - "Do you believe in miracles?"
I was laughing when he cut him off just to ask that. Geez.
G4MBAs 4 weeks ago
*scoff the justice system is in no way based on the commandments
BurnSpangler 4 weeks ago
You know, when someone is trying to debate for his opinion and they say things like "I kicked his butt" they just lose all credibility in my eyes. I stopped watching at that point.
G4MBAs 4 weeks ago
God this video. These people are retards. Bills the bigger of the two.
CamelJaq 4 weeks ago
The fact that Bill O'Reilly thinks he kicked Dawkins' ass is delusional in the extreme. Shouting over someone with the same ill-educated sound-bytes rather than expressing an original thought is not 'kicking ass'. The "man" has delusions of mediocrity.
And as to, "it's more emotion with them". Wow! Pot, meet kettle. Adherence to religion is almost always about emotion ahead of intellect.
COEXISTential 4 weeks ago
But you are an idiot!
TheShanthanC 4 weeks ago
HAHAHAHA, OMFG!
zkvattram 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
nettocrat 4 weeks ago
Chopra is a modern day snake oil salesman. And O'Reilly is an idiot. Neither make good points at all. What a joke. Of course, the average Fox viewer will watch this and go "Ya, Ya....makes good sense". And then go back to eating their bag of cheesies while waiting for reruns of The Bachelor. Pathetic.
54highlife 1 month ago 2
@54highlife The fuck you got against cheesies?
TheHerbulator 4 weeks ago
Pathetic...absolutely pathetic...I swear, I couldnt stand O'Reilly and didnt like Deepak Chopra, before but now I cant stand both of em... Theyre just a bunch of dimwits...the way Chopra conformed to O'Reilly just to get his support?? a pathetic attempt..I honestly feel that they ARE idiots...not all creationists are...but these two , hell yeah...
astroajay 1 month ago
search on you tube for
Deepak Chopra Apologizes to Richard Dawkin
aMagicalUnic0rn 1 month ago 2
"I kick his butt"
QuixoticQuaver 1 month ago in playlist More videos from AtheistMediaBlog
The universe does not comform to earths "laws of nature" you dumb ass, look up quantum physics. You are taling about a macroobject world. Man I am not smart but the more you read you realize how stupid they are
art0neable 1 month ago
@art0neable Seems like you're the dumbass. First there no such thing as "earths laws of nature" because the laws of nature apply to the whole universe. The physical constants are the same here on earth as they are billions of light years away in space.
atheistrocker100 1 month ago 27
This amount of primitive idiocy is truly shocking, the realization that not only are there individuals such as these two who note only have these views but are able to spread their influence on people who may not be able to withstand this bombardment of nonsense, truly hurts. I can only hope that long after I am gone, humanity and society will continue to evolve until it gets to a point that a video like this, with individuals such as these would be impossible.... watching this truly hurts...
XCoreGam1ng 1 month ago 3
The most exasperating 5 minutes of my life. Do they understand how childish they both sounded?
InsanoGerbil 1 month ago 3
wow what a load of nonsense
wompasdub 1 month ago
richard dawkins has more emotion in his debate then bill o'reilly?
Cool66556 1 month ago
Chopra is an agnostic-desist. I became interested in his work when i discovered his atheism and criticism of contemporary religious traditions. shortly into his book "The Third Jesus" i realized his particular brand of apologetics and have dismissed him since. I appreciate his attempts to be an out-of-the-box thinker in championing spirituality without religion, but he tried to 'have the cake and eat it too.' He is an atheist in denial.
Bill O'Reilly is an ignorant, one man spin committee.
belodeau 1 month ago
So, if we can't create it, it *must* be the creation of a god....lol
starwarsvideos 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Atheists are the emotional ones?? Really?? Lol.
starwarsvideos 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
I want to strangle a cat everytime I hear this idiot speak
b1gr1g 1 month ago 2
This was all just a gigantic ad-hominem against Richard Dawkins. What a waste of 5 minutes.
huwrj 1 month ago
Chopra's a charlatan and a fraud.
genesarereal 1 month ago
O'Reilly had the honor of having an Ig Nobel Prize winner on his show. Way to go Bill. Keep it up.
ampoules1 1 month ago
Bill o'reily said he hopes there is a god. I for one looking at him from a perspective, do not see a god fearing man, I do not se a humble and generous man. I wouldn't definatly lke to listen, if there where a god, and Bill was confroted with him..
allermann1 1 month ago
Bill o reily is just a black bag of, anger, hate, and greed.
allermann1 1 month ago
Comment removed
ampoules1 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
NO scientist will refute that science has no absolute answer for all "whys"! If it did there would be no science. Science comes to theories, based off ideas, that become hypothesis, that are then tested over and over again by MANY different unbiased scientist. Only then do they come to a conclusion of a scientific theory. So no scientist will ever say ANYTHING has 100% certainty. Science has questions that may never be answered. Religion has answers that may never be questioned.
mjfraser04 1 month ago 2
I always thought Bill O'Riley was an idiot. This video proved this as well.
pcgmithu 1 month ago 2
What these idiots miss is that something religious is as important as the person that says it. Pope's words are most important than a bishop's. But scientific facts are not like that - a person's credentials dont matter. Relativity was discovered by a patent office worker. Its the evidence that counts.
aaqucnaona94 1 month ago
Beliefs are NOT facts. If it was FACT, it would require no belief at all.
nobody8131 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos 2
wow i just lost SO MUCH RESPECT for Deepak Chopra.
drowningrock 1 month ago
5:08 minutes i will never get back. they didnt say anything of value and they didnt care enough to backup their claims.... in what part of the world is this regarded as news?? srsly....
Kiesel 1 month ago 2
Dawkins sucks! Hes also a coward. I lost any respect i had for Dawkins when he refused to debate Lane Criag.
atheistrocker100 1 month ago 20
@atheistrocker100
"that would look got on your cv, but not so good on mine..." ;)
Kiesel 1 month ago
@atheistrocker100 i'm so confused; does your name mean you ARE an atheist or does it mean you rock (as in beat) atheist? Either way, you're an idiot (to which i will not clarify because you did not clarify your own views on dawkins). If you'd expound on why Dawkins sucks, I'd be glad to give you evidence as to why you're an idiot.
SilenusTheSecond 1 month ago
@atheistrocker100 You lost respect for him for refusing to give a modicum of credibility to pseudo-philosopher by letting people believe there's an actual debate to be had there? WLC brings nothing new to the table, every one of his arguments have been discredited decades ago. I'd lose respect for him if he did engage in a serious debate with that moron WLC.
Kiros37100 1 month ago
@atheistrocker100 Craig is no one, his claim to fame is not getting a response from Dawkins to a debate and most of his arguments are meaningless rambles its worth searching for "William Lane Craig, True Colors" for a good laugh.
aMagicalUnic0rn 1 month ago
@atheistrocker100 Dawkins does not. This video could best be titled as "Blind Leading the Blind" or "Snake Oil Salesman Strikes Again"
The Ten Commandments hang in the Supreme Court. So what! The 10 C's are hardly our best work.
54highlife 1 month ago
@atheistrocker100 He's no coward. He just doesn't want to give credence to a total wanker
Rockster969 2 weeks ago
@Rockster969 See this is why i don;t have much respect for you atheists. You comment on how tolerant and morally perfect you all are, when actually atheists are probably the most intolerant of all, (not *all* atheists, but the majority) Iv met WLC; he did a talk at my old college. Whether you disagree with him or not on his world view is irrelevant. Hes very nice man who wouldn't hurt a fly. When i hear you all saying hes an "idiot, wanker etc" i instantly know, you're just dumb assholes
atheistrocker100 2 weeks ago
@atheistrocker100 Are you serious? Dawkins is the opposite of a coward. He must get hate mail every day, yet he continues to be outspoken in his books and in countless interviews and shows. He has had one on one debates with many creationists. To call him a coward is the most untruthful statement imaginable. I imagine he is sick to the back teeth of debating creationists, and let's be honest - Dawkins is not a theological philosopher- such an debate would not be progressive.
Yokel47 2 weeks ago
@Yokel47 " yet he continues to be outspoken in his books" Yes, i'm sure its so hard for him, making all the millions of dollars he does, hes not courageous, hes just clever enough to make idiots like you pay money to hear him regurgitate old 18th century atheist arguments, simply by adding more aggression and anti-religious controversy.
"debating creationists" WLC is NOT a creationist.
"the most untruthful statement imaginable" Tell that to his Oxford peers who seem to agree with me.
atheistrocker100 2 weeks ago
@atheistrocker100 Don't hate on him just because he's a successuful author as well as a world renowned biologist. 18th century arguments? Please tell me what the significance of that is? how are these arguments 18th century? WLC may not be a creationist. but he believes god oversaw evolution. Reconciling evolution with a benevolent God is stupid because the whole Darwinian process of natural selection is brutal and has no morality. WLC also thinks ID is a 'viable alternative'
Yokel47 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Yokel47 2 weeks ago
@Yokel47 So WLC IS partially creationist
Yokel47 2 weeks ago
@atheistrocker100 He is not a coward! He just deems it a total waste of time. I wouldn't debate with an Islamic fundamentalist. Why? Because no matter what you say; they have an answer for everything. Debates are for open minded people.
themax316 2 weeks ago
Chopra is clearly going senile and falling to new lows. Dawkins kicked his butt!
MyVideoComments 1 month ago
Wow! What a couple of imbeciles
vandresv 1 month ago
two morons in the same room. this is why this world will never go forward fast enough
wanafly12 1 month ago
The reason Dawkins gets upset is because Bill is an idiotic, brain dead moron
Yokel47 1 month ago 2
Wow...that is one of the most unscrupulous and disingenuous things I have ever watched. These two have no shame.
Quarkium 1 month ago
Chopra apologizes to Dawkins in a video (you can find it here on youtube) after this sad-ass
interview with Bill"loud-mouth,arrogant,lying,ignorant,moron"O'Reilly.
B.O.really thinks he got the better of Dawkins in earlier interviews!?
Give me a break...
leapinglizardking 1 month ago 2
wow, two idiots talking about religion.
TLG160 1 month ago
Omnipotence and omniscience? The two cannot coincide. Omnipotence on its own is hard to reconcile. Can God make a rock so heavy he cannot lift it? These are just words, when taken literally, reveal the true ignorance of the subject. On one hand we are told God is unknowable and mysterious and beyond human comprehension but in the same breath the believer says "I know god and I know his intent and he speaks to me." Seriously??
zappafile 1 month ago
I am a Christian and even I dislike O'Reilly. He has this overly smug attitude and is a horrible interviewer.
HiDefJesus 1 month ago 2
Oh god LOL.
inmothlight 1 month ago
look how Chopra is being manipulated by O'Reilly
aramian21 1 month ago
Comment removed
aramian21 1 month ago
I bet when life can be produced in labs by scientists they'll just switch it up and say "See! That proves that there MUST be a creator in order to create life." instead of taking in the fact that life can be made from natural materials. =____=
DivinePoWAR 1 month ago
tide comes in tide goes out.. lol
FUwogs 1 month ago
How can people thumb down this video. It's classic comedy from BillO! he's just hilarious.
gibboanx 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Bill O' Reilly is a struggling to extract point from deepak chopra in favour of christain god but deepak chopra explains about hindu spiritual ideaology of god. wat a joke on this show and Bill O' Reilly i pity for ur state
hellobal100 1 month ago
I dream about screaming in Bill O'Reilly's face about how much of a fucking idiot he is.
timmytoast22 1 month ago 2
Depak Chopra looks like a faggot.
DamionCrane 1 month ago 2
1:24, HE'S RIGHT
2803pink 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Concousness and God are the same thing. God created the universe by thinking the universe into existence and as a result, the universe responds to thought. Read the book the Secret!
Stevo6452 1 month ago
Bill is brain dead
StudioStar 1 month ago 2
That bill is viewed as a smart man shows what usa has to offer
jahlstrand1995 1 month ago
@jahlstrand1995 He isn't a smart man to all American's
2803pink 1 month ago
@2803pink isnt he like a republican front figure? sorry i dont know much im from sweden:P
jahlstrand1995 1 month ago
@jahlstrand1995 He thinks he is, and so does Fox News. I don't think he can tell his head from his ass because shit comes out both ends....lol. I live in Ohio, and I don't know much either....I think we are in the same boat
2803pink 4 weeks ago
title of the video should be "Two dummies attempt a meaningful discussion."
DatenshiZ 1 month ago 2
Fox News for retards.
persvidal 1 month ago
militant atheists are as annoying as religious freaks
TheOkham 1 month ago
@TheOkham
Aha! Completely Agreed!
glenjacobs423 1 month ago
I think that both O'Reilly and Dawkins are idiots!
TheOkham 1 month ago
@HamzaAndreasTzortzis Why would he waste his time to debate against idiots like you anymore?YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE.
xZHRx 1 month ago
Science CANNOT conclude that the Easter Bunny doesn't exist.
Futureplanet 1 month ago
I wonder if Dawkins will ever go on this bullshit programme again. :D
crazytosh1 1 month ago
@crazytosh1 he has 3 times before... so... yeah probably
gat0rgirl13 1 month ago
OH. MY. GOD.
Lunatics not only walking free, but getting rich with this utter bullshit!
ib422000 1 month ago
Lol "kicked his but" this sounds so childish, i was done watching after hearing such an immature fallacy.
gr4ndhustle 1 month ago
deepak chopra is a complete and utter contradiction in himself,.. he talks the talk but doesn't walk the walk ,.. he is full of ego and greed as well as judgemental and dismissive of others beliefs,.. the prrof of a man is in his actions,.. deepak took good knowledge and prostituted it for money and fame, he took a great a gift of understanding then twisted it to make a profit and excuse his own ego while looking down his nose at others. that is to say he deserves nothing in way of honor.
MrMentalflossed 1 month ago
this interview is a joke lmao
tadhg964 1 month ago
anyone else amazed that Billo invited a foreign brown person with an accent and a funny sounding name on his show? it's surprising to me, because if Chopra was wearing the wrong kind of clothing, Billo and all the other FauxBots would think he was a terrorist.
Cuddlebunzzzz 1 month ago
@Cuddlebunzzzz i am not at all surprised, it is an old ploy,.. put a sell out from a group on stage and play nice,.. i say sell out for deepak not on racial terms but on spiritual ones,..fox is a propaganda machine ,.. so in helping them spread hate and lies deepak in effect took his reputation and sold it to those spreading discord for an appearance fee knowing full well what they do and how they do it. i can expect that from the regular joe but held up by so many as a spiritual man sickens me.
MrMentalflossed 1 month ago
I struggled to the end of this video. What a fucking crock of shit. These two are just spouting utter nonsense. Dawkins has more credibility in his left nipple than these two fuckwits put together. They are a pair of lying cunts. Chopra KNOWS he is bullshitting. He can hardly keep a straight face.
grahamlive 2 months ago
There's more emotion with them? Wow. Look who's talking :/
summerlytriangle 2 months ago